Sixty Parkside
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Sixty Parkside
Building Overview
Sixty Parkside in Mililani-Waipio (built 2011); pets and short-term rentals are not allowed per MLS.
About Sixty Parkside
Sixty Parkside is a condominium building located in the Mililani-Waipio neighborhood. According to available records, the building was constructed in 2011. Size (number of units/floor plans) and construction type are not specified in the MLS data provided.
Key features and on-site amenities are not detailed in the available MLS information. The MLS notes property-use policies: pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not allowed. The management company for the building is listed as unknown in the data provided.
Additional specifics such as parking arrangements, maintenance fees, special assessments, and on-site services are not included in the MLS data reviewed. Based on MLS data analysis, buyers should verify all building details, rules, fees, and management information with listing agents or association representatives before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for any explicit owner-occupancy percentage or descriptive language indicating a high owner-occupied community, but found none. The remarks describe the building and units, not the ownership mix. Because there is no direct evidence, the value remains unknown.
The public remarks repeatedly confirm that Sixty Parkside has elevator access. Because the current value is 1 and the remarks do not state a different count, I kept the existing number. The evidence supports elevator availability, but not a change in the number of elevators.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Common area electricity appears to be a building feature with very strong support: 18 of 20 current MLS listings include OTCOEX. The public remarks do not explicitly say “common electric,” but they repeatedly reflect a standard association-maintained building, and there is no conflicting evidence. This looks like reliable building-level MLS data rather than a one-off agent entry.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Hot water is not supported by the current MLS data: 0 of 20 listings check HOTWAT. Multiple remarks mention a “new water heater” or include WTRHTR, which is a strong sign the building does not provide hot water as an included maintenance item. Across the listings, there is no explicit remark indicating HOA-supplied hot water.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer inclusion is strongly supported by the MLS data, with 18 of 20 listings checking SEWER. The remarks are largely silent on sewer, but there is no evidence of a correction or change. This looks like consistent building-level inclusion across listings.
Water is included in the maintenance fee in most current MLS records: 17 of 20 listings check WATER. The public remarks do not explicitly mention water, but they also do not suggest any change or exception. Overall, this is strong enough to treat as a building-level feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence that Sixty Parkside offers patio/deck-style outdoor space. At least 8-10 listings explicitly mention a lanai, patio, covered lanai, or private yard, and the wording appears across multiple agents rather than a single copied remark. This aligns with the historical MLS pattern showing PATDEC/COVPAT in a substantial share of listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
In-unit laundry is overwhelmingly supported for this building. Multiple recent listings explicitly mention "full size washer/dryer in unit," "full washer/dryer in the unit," and "in-unit washer, dryer," and the MLS inclusions show washer/dryer in 20/20 listings. The evidence is consistent across many listings, not just one agent, so this feature should be treated as firmly present.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Parking is strongly confirmed across the building. Multiple remarks explicitly mention "two assigned parking spaces," "2 parking spots," "2 parking spaces available," and "ample guest and street parking." The evidence is consistent across many listings and agents, so parking is a highly reliable building feature.
Strong evidence across many listings that this building offers assigned parking. Multiple remarks explicitly mention "2 assigned parking spots," "two deeded parking spaces," and a "designated" assigned stall, which is consistent with the historical MLS confidence. This does not look like a one-off copy-paste issue because the assigned-parking language appears in several independent remarks.
Covered parking is well supported by both historical MLS data and current remarks. Several listings explicitly mention "one covered and one uncovered," "1 covered & 1 open parking stalls," "two assigned covered parking spaces," and "2 covered tandem parking." This is strong multi-listing evidence rather than a single-agent copy/paste claim.
The remarks directly identify parking as deeded, which indicates the stalls are owned with the unit. This is supported clearly enough to mark the feature true.
No analysis available
I looked for any monthly parking charge, parking rental, or additional parking cost language. The listings mention assigned, covered, uncovered, and deeded stalls, but no parking fee was provided.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Tandem parking is supported by both MLS checkbox data and a direct remark. One listing explicitly states '2 covered tandem parking,' and current MLS data shows 4 of 18 listings tagged TANDEM, indicating this is a real feature available in some units.
No analysis available
I searched for parking waitlist or waiting list wording and found none. The remarks describe assigned and deeded stalls, but do not mention any waitlist system, so this is treated as absent.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong building-level evidence supports split AC. Roughly 15+ listings explicitly mention phrases like "Split AC," "split air-conditioning," "multi-zone split air conditioning units," "two split A/C units," and "split AC units in living room and primary/master bedroom." The consistency across multiple remarks suggests this is a real, recurring building feature rather than a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Double-wall construction is strongly supported as a building-level feature for Sixty Parkside. The MLS data is very consistent (18/20 current listings), and the pattern across listings looks like a repeated building-level entry rather than an isolated agent error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings mention "steel frame" or similar construction details; the remarks focus on flooring, AC, parking, and renovations instead. With only 1 of 20 current MLS records showing STEFRA and no supporting public remarks, the evidence points to this being absent or incorrectly entered in MLS data.
Concrete slab is only weakly supported. Even though some MLS entries include SLAB, the remarks never explicitly mention a slab foundation, so this does not rise to a dependable building-level feature.
No analysis available
Wood frame construction is not supported by the public remarks. Across the listings provided, there are no phrases like 'wood frame' or 'wood frame construction,' and the MLS checkbox appears inconsistent rather than building-wide.
Above-ground construction is not supported by the remarks and is only weakly present in current MLS data. With just 3/20 listings checking the box and no explicit supporting language, the feature is not reliable enough to treat as building-wide.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for STR-related language such as short-term rental allowed, vacation rental, NUC/TVU, hotel program terms, or restrictions like owner-occupant only and 30-day minimums. None were mentioned in the public remarks, so there is no evidence that STR is allowed.
I searched for hotel rental pool language such as managed-by-hotel, brand pool participation, or similar rental program references. None were found, and without evidence that STR is allowed, this must be false.
I looked for wording indicating required participation, cannot opt out, or mandatory rental-pool rules. The remarks contain no such language, so there is no basis for a mandatory pool feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for leasehold, ground lease, lease expiry, and extension language such as "lease expires" or "lease renewed through". No lease tenure or expiration year was mentioned in the public remarks, so this remains unknown.
The public remarks repeatedly confirm VA financing availability through assumable VA loan language. This is strong, direct evidence from multiple listings, so the feature is set to true.
I looked for HOA insurance language such as fully insured, walls-in coverage, or comprehensive building insurance, and found nothing. The remarks discuss amenities, parking, and security, but not insurance coverage. This remains false at low confidence due to no evidence.
Fire sprinklers are strongly supported across the listings. At least 2 listings explicitly mention them, including phrases like 'updated sprinkler system in every room and common areas' and 'fire sprinklers in-unit and on the premises,' which confirms building-level coverage rather than a one-off unit feature. This aligns with the historical MLS pattern where many listings checked FIRSPR, so the evidence appears consistent rather than copy-paste error.
I searched the remarks for explicit fire/life safety evaluation language and found none. The listings do mention fire sprinklers, but that does not confirm a passed fire/life safety evaluation. With no direct evidence, this remains false at low confidence.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is moderate evidence the building offers some garden-view units: 7 of 20 current MLS listings mark the view as GARDEN. However, the public remarks more often say things like “overlooking the park,” “lush park,” or “next to serene Melemanu Park,” which supports a green outlook but not a clearly documented garden/courtyard view. This looks partly like MLS checkbox usage rather than repeated explicit agent descriptions.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across the provided listings, 0/20 mention sunset views and many have view_descriptions of NONE. Remarks instead reference park views, lanai views, and generic light/space language, with no explicit "sunset view," "western exposure," or similar phrasing. The evidence is consistent across multiple listings and appears to reflect absence rather than copy-paste confusion.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.