Six Twenty Sheridan
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Six Twenty Sheridan
Building Overview
Six Twenty Sheridan in Downtown-Chinatown — concrete building (built 1980); covered assigned parking; pets and short-term rentals not allowed.
About Six Twenty Sheridan
Six Twenty Sheridan is located in the Downtown-Chinatown neighborhood and was built in 1980. According to available records the building is constructed of concrete. Specific unit counts and square footage were not provided in the available MLS-derived data.
Key features identified from MLS data include covered, assigned parking. Pet ownership and short-term rentals are not permitted at this property per the available records. No building-managed amenities (such as a pool, gym, or concierge) were listed in the provided data.
Additional details available from the MLS include that the management company is unknown; maintenance fees and other assessments were not provided. Based on MLS data analysis, buyers should verify all building details, rules, and fees with the listing agent or management before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit owner-occupancy figures or phrases such as "80% owner occupied" or "highly owner occupied." The remarks discuss the unit, building access, maintenance, and location, but do not provide any owner-occupancy information. Because there is no stated percentage, the value is unknown.
I searched the remarks for an explicit elevator count such as "4 elevators," "multiple elevators," or similar phrasing. The listings confirm the building has an elevator, but none state how many elevators are in the building. Because no count is provided, the number remains unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
At least 3 of 5 listings list common-area electric in association_fee_includes and 4 of the public remarks explicitly state electricity is included or that solar offsets are reflected in maintenance fees (quotes: "Electricity is included in the maintenance fee", "included in the maintenance fees"). Evidence is strong and consistent across multiple agent remarks, indicating building-level common-area electricity is included.
No analysis available
Strong evidence across several listings: at least 3-4 remarks explicitly state electricity is included, including the exact phrase "Electricity is included in the maintenance fee." The wording is consistent across listings and appears to be repeated by multiple agents, not just copied once.
Although 3 of 5 MLS records have GAS checked, zero of the public remarks (across multiple listings) mention gas being included in maintenance. The absence of any explicit agent remark about gas suggests the checkbox entries are likely copy/paste errors, so hot-water/gas-in-fee should be treated as not included.
Three MLS records list HOTWAT, but across the public remarks (multiple agent entries) there is no explicit phrase like "hot water included" or "hot water in HOA"; agents repeatedly emphasize electricity inclusion instead. Because remarks do not confirm hot water inclusion and checkboxes may be inconsistent, treat hot water-as-included as not present.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listing uses the word "sewer" directly, but the building’s remarks say maintenance includes "all utilities except cable tv and internet," which implies sewer is covered. This aligns with the current MLS data showing SEWER checked in all 6/6 listings, so the feature is strongly supported.
Water is supported by the remark that maintenance includes "all utilities except cable tv and internet," implying water is included. This matches the MLS checkbox data, where WATER is checked in all 6/6 listings, making this a strong building-level feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Community laundry is clearly confirmed for this building. Multiple listings explicitly mention a "rooftop community laundry" or "community laundry located on bldg roof," and the current MLS data shows COMLAU checked across all 6/6 listings. This looks consistent across agents rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Assigned parking is strongly supported across the listings. Multiple remarks explicitly reference an 'assigned, compact parking stall' and a 'designated' style stall, matching the MLS assignment data and appearing consistently across several agent remarks rather than as a one-off mention.
Covered parking is confirmed in every remark set, with phrases like 'secured garage,' 'covered parking space,' and '1-covered parking stall.' The evidence is consistent across multiple listings and aligns with the MLS data, so this feature should remain true.
I searched for deeded/owned parking language, including "deeded parking," "owned stall," or "parking included in deed." The remarks only confirm an assigned, covered stall in a secured garage, which is not enough to verify deeded ownership.
No analysis available
I looked for any parking rental charge, monthly parking fee, or additional parking cost and found none. The listings state that parking is included/assigned, but they do not mention a separate fee.
No analysis available
Secured parking/access is repeatedly referenced, including 'secured garage' and the building offering 'secured entry.' The remarks are consistent across listings and appear to reflect actual building access rather than copied checkbox data, supporting a strong true value.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for references to a parking waitlist or waiting-list process and found nothing. The remarks discuss assigned parking stalls, but do not indicate any waitlist system.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Concrete is strongly supported by the MLS record: 6 of 6 listings have CONCRE checked. The public remarks do not explicitly say 'concrete,' but there is no evidence of a recent change or correction, so this appears to be a consistent building-level construction material.
Double-wall construction is not corroborated in any of the remarks. With only 2 of 6 listings checking DOUWAL, the current evidence looks inconsistent and more likely reflects agent entry variation than a verified building characteristic.
No analysis available
Masonry/stucco is not supported by the public remarks, and only a minority of current listings mark MASSTU. Because the remarks repeatedly describe the building as a boutique low-rise with no construction detail, this appears likely to be MLS copy/paste noise rather than a reliable building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for STR indicators such as "short-term rental allowed," NUC, TVU, vacation rental wording, or hotel-style rental language and found none. There is no public evidence in the remarks that short-term rentals are allowed.
I looked for hotel rental pool references such as Hilton pool, Trump pool, Ritz pool, or hotel-managed rental program language and found none. Since there is also no evidence that STR is allowed, this cannot be true.
I searched for language indicating a required rental pool, such as "must participate," "cannot opt out," or mandatory hotel program wording and found none. With no evidence of STR allowance, a mandatory pool is also not supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for leasehold/ground-lease language such as "lease expires 2050," "ground lease ends," or any renewal/extension date and found nothing. The remarks do not reference land tenure or a lease expiry year.
I searched the public remarks for VA-related language such as "VA approved," "VA financing," or "VA loans accepted" and found none. The listings discuss parking, maintenance, and building upgrades, but do not mention VA eligibility.
I searched for wording such as "fully insured," "full insurance," "walls-in coverage," or similar HOA insurance references. The remarks focus on maintenance, utilities, solar panels, and building improvements, but do not mention insurance coverage. Without direct evidence, this is marked false with moderate confidence.
No analysis available
I looked for language indicating the building passed a fire/life safety evaluation, was fire safety certified, or had passed inspection. The remarks only mention plumbing, elevator, and garage door work being completed, which is not the same as an FLSE pass. With no direct evidence, this is marked false with moderate confidence.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is no supporting evidence that this building offers sunset views. Across the current listings, sunset is not mentioned in any remarks, and most view descriptions are NONE, which strongly suggests the feature is absent or not marketed for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.