Six Twenty Sheridan
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Six Twenty Sheridan
Building Overview
Six Twenty Sheridan in Downtown-Chinatown — concrete building (built 1980); covered assigned parking; pets and short-term rentals not allowed.
About Six Twenty Sheridan
Six Twenty Sheridan is located in the Downtown-Chinatown neighborhood and was built in 1980. According to available records the building is constructed of concrete. Specific unit counts and square footage were not provided in the available MLS-derived data.
Key features identified from MLS data include covered, assigned parking. Pet ownership and short-term rentals are not permitted at this property per the available records. No building-managed amenities (such as a pool, gym, or concierge) were listed in the provided data.
Additional details available from the MLS include that the management company is unknown; maintenance fees and other assessments were not provided. Based on MLS data analysis, buyers should verify all building details, rules, and fees with the listing agent or management before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for an owner-occupancy figure or any wording about the resident mix, but nothing was included in the remarks. The text focuses on the unit condition, location, and building amenities, so owner occupancy remains unknown.
I looked for an explicit elevator count such as "4 elevators" or "multiple elevators," but none was provided. The listings only confirm that the building has elevator access and has had elevator-related work completed, so the number remains unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
At least 3 of 5 listings list common-area electric in association_fee_includes and 4 of the public remarks explicitly state electricity is included or that solar offsets are reflected in maintenance fees (quotes: "Electricity is included in the maintenance fee", "included in the maintenance fees"). Evidence is strong and consistent across multiple agent remarks, indicating building-level common-area electricity is included.
No analysis available
Strong evidence across several listings: at least 3-4 remarks explicitly state electricity is included, including the exact phrase "Electricity is included in the maintenance fee." The wording is consistent across listings and appears to be repeated by multiple agents, not just copied once.
Although 3 of 5 MLS records have GAS checked, zero of the public remarks (across multiple listings) mention gas being included in maintenance. The absence of any explicit agent remark about gas suggests the checkbox entries are likely copy/paste errors, so hot-water/gas-in-fee should be treated as not included.
Three MLS records list HOTWAT, but across the public remarks (multiple agent entries) there is no explicit phrase like "hot water included" or "hot water in HOA"; agents repeatedly emphasize electricity inclusion instead. Because remarks do not confirm hot water inclusion and checkboxes may be inconsistent, treat hot water-as-included as not present.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listing uses the word "sewer" directly, but the building’s remarks say maintenance includes "all utilities except cable tv and internet," which implies sewer is covered. This aligns with the current MLS data showing SEWER checked in all 6/6 listings, so the feature is strongly supported.
Water is supported by the remark that maintenance includes "all utilities except cable tv and internet," implying water is included. This matches the MLS checkbox data, where WATER is checked in all 6/6 listings, making this a strong building-level feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Community laundry is clearly confirmed for this building. Multiple listings explicitly mention a "rooftop community laundry" or "community laundry located on bldg roof," and the current MLS data shows COMLAU checked across all 6/6 listings. This looks consistent across agents rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Assigned parking is strongly supported across the listings. Multiple remarks explicitly reference an 'assigned, compact parking stall' and a 'designated' style stall, matching the MLS assignment data and appearing consistently across several agent remarks rather than as a one-off mention.
Covered parking is confirmed in every remark set, with phrases like 'secured garage,' 'covered parking space,' and '1-covered parking stall.' The evidence is consistent across multiple listings and aligns with the MLS data, so this feature should remain true.
I searched for 'deeded parking,' 'owned stall,' 'parking included in deed,' or similar wording. The listings only mention assigned/covered/secured parking, which is not enough to पुष्टि deeded ownership.
No analysis available
I looked for any mention of a parking fee, parking rental, monthly parking charge, or additional parking cost. The remarks describe the stall but do not mention any separate parking payment, so no fee can be extracted.
No analysis available
Secured parking/access is repeatedly referenced, including 'secured garage' and the building offering 'secured entry.' The remarks are consistent across listings and appear to reflect actual building access rather than copied checkbox data, supporting a strong true value.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for references to a parking waitlist, waiting list, or joining a queue for parking and found none. The remarks instead indicate assigned parking, which does not imply a waitlist system.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Concrete is strongly supported by the MLS record: 6 of 6 listings have CONCRE checked. The public remarks do not explicitly say 'concrete,' but there is no evidence of a recent change or correction, so this appears to be a consistent building-level construction material.
Double-wall construction is not corroborated in any of the remarks. With only 2 of 6 listings checking DOUWAL, the current evidence looks inconsistent and more likely reflects agent entry variation than a verified building characteristic.
No analysis available
Masonry/stucco is not supported by the public remarks, and only a minority of current listings mark MASSTU. Because the remarks repeatedly describe the building as a boutique low-rise with no construction detail, this appears likely to be MLS copy/paste noise rather than a reliable building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for short-term rental indicators such as 'short-term rental allowed,' NUC, TVU, 'vacation rental allowed,' or similar wording and found nothing. Since there is no evidence of STR permission, this is treated as not supported by the public remarks.
I looked for hotel rental pool references such as Hilton, Ritz, Trump, 'hotel pool,' or 'managed by hotel,' and found none. Because STR is not evidenced as allowed, this also cannot be true based on the remarks.
I searched for language indicating mandatory participation, such as 'must participate,' 'cannot opt out,' or required rental-program membership, and found nothing. With no STR/hotel-pool evidence in the remarks, mandatory pool participation is not supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for leasehold wording such as 'lease expires,' 'ground lease ends,' 'leasehold expiring,' or any renewal/extension date, and found nothing. Since no specific lease-expiry year appears in the remarks, the value remains unknown.
I searched the remarks for VA-related language such as 'VA approved,' 'VA financing,' and 'VA loans accepted' and found none. Based on the absence of any such mention in the listings, this is treated as not evidenced in the public remarks.
I looked for HOA insurance language that would indicate the building is fully insured or walls-in covered, but there were no such references. The remarks discuss maintenance fees, assessments, and solar savings, but not insurance coverage.
No analysis available
I searched the public remarks for language indicating a passed fire/life safety evaluation or similar certification, but found nothing. Mentions of plumbing, elevator, and garage door improvements do not establish FLSE status.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is no supporting evidence that this building offers sunset views. Across the current listings, sunset is not mentioned in any remarks, and most view descriptions are NONE, which strongly suggests the feature is absent or not marketed for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.