Six Twenty Sheridan
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Six Twenty Sheridan
Building Overview
Six Twenty Sheridan in Downtown-Chinatown — concrete building (built 1980); covered assigned parking; pets and short-term rentals not allowed.
About Six Twenty Sheridan
Six Twenty Sheridan is located in the Downtown-Chinatown neighborhood and was built in 1980. According to available records the building is constructed of concrete. Specific unit counts and square footage were not provided in the available MLS-derived data.
Key features identified from MLS data include covered, assigned parking. Pet ownership and short-term rentals are not permitted at this property per the available records. No building-managed amenities (such as a pool, gym, or concierge) were listed in the provided data.
Additional details available from the MLS include that the management company is unknown; maintenance fees and other assessments were not provided. Based on MLS data analysis, buyers should verify all building details, rules, and fees with the listing agent or management before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
Looked for explicit percentages and phrases indicating owner-occupancy level and found none. Because no current value exists and remarks do not state a percentage, owner-occupancy is unknown.
The public remarks confirm the building has elevator access and elevator-related work was completed, but no explicit number of elevators is provided. Searched the remarks for explicit numeric phrases (e.g., '4 elevators', 'two elevators') and found none, so the exact count is unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
4 of the 5 listings explicitly reference electricity being covered (quotes include "Electricity is included in the maintenance fee" and "included in the maintenance fees" with solar panels lowering costs). Evidence is consistent across multiple agent remarks and aligns with the MLS checkbox data, indicating strong support that electricity is included in the building maintenance fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 5 listings' MLS association_fee_includes checkboxes list SEWER. While no remark uses the word "sewer," one remark says "Maint fee includes all utilities except cable tv and internet," implying sewer is covered. The MLS consistency plus that implied remark provide moderate-to-high confidence that sewer is included.
All 5 listings show WATER checked in MLS and a public remark explicitly notes "Maint fee includes all utilities except cable tv and internet," which directly implies water is included. The combination of unanimous MLS checkbox data and explicit remark yields high confidence that water is included in the maintenance fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 5 current MLS listings have the COMLAU amenity checked, and multiple agent remarks explicitly state a rooftop/community laundry (quotes: "rooftop community laundry"; "Community laundry located on bldg roof"). Evidence is consistent across listings and supported by remarks rather than solely checkbox copy-paste, so confidence is high.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 5 listings reference a specific stall (phrases like 'your compact parking stall' and '1-covered parking stall'), matching MLS checkbox data (5/5). Multiple agents explicitly describe a designated stall, so evidence is strong and consistent across listings.
All 5 listings mention covered parking (quotes include 'secured garage', 'covered parking stall', and 'covered parking space'), which aligns with MLS parking_features (COVERE/CO1/CO2/GARAGE). The consistent language across multiple agents indicates strong evidence for covered parking.
The listings repeatedly reference an assigned/covered parking stall (e.g., 'Your compact parking stall is located in the secured garage', 'covered parking stall'), but they do not use language indicating the stall is deeded or owned with the unit. Because deeded status is not explicitly stated, I do not mark it as deeded.
No analysis available
I searched for any indication of a parking rental fee or monthly parking charge. The remarks mention included/assigned parking stalls but do not state any parking fee amount, so parking fee is unknown.
No analysis available
Although MLS checkboxes show SECENT on 3/5 listings, all 5 public remarks reference secure access (e.g., 'offers secured entry', 'your compact parking stall is located in the secured garage', 'secured, pet-friendly building'), indicating the building has secured entry/parking and multiple agents independently noted it.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for language about a parking waitlist or waiting list procedures. The remarks make no reference to a waitlist, implying there is no advertised waitlist system in the public remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 5 listings (5/5) have the CONCRE checkbox in MLS, but public remarks do not mention concrete construction (no phrases like 'concrete' or 'reinforced concrete'). Evidence is consistent across MLS entries but appears to be agent-entered checkbox data with no corroborating remarks, so confidence is moderate.
One listing (1/5) has the double-wall (DOUWAL) checkbox in MLS, but none of the public remarks contain terms like 'double wall' or 'double-wall construction'. The solitary MLS entry indicates it may apply to some unit(s), but the lack of remark confirmation results in only moderate confidence.
No analysis available
One of the five listings (1/5) lists masonry and stucco (MASSTU) in MLS, but none of the public remarks include 'masonry' or 'stucco'. The single MLS checkbox suggests some unit(s) may be recorded that way, but lack of corroborating remarks keeps confidence moderate-low.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for explicit language permitting or prohibiting short-term rentals. The public remarks do not mention STR policies or rental pool options, so there is no evidence STR is allowed.
I searched for 'hotel rental pool', 'hotel rental program', or hotel-managed rental language. None of the listings mention a hotel rental pool, and since STR is not indicated as allowed, hotel-pool participation is set to false.
I looked for language indicating participation in a rental pool is required (e.g., 'mandatory', 'must participate'). The remarks contain no such language, so there is no evidence of a mandatory rental-pool requirement.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for language such as 'lease expires', 'land lease to', or a 4-digit lease expiry year. The public remarks contain no reference to leasehold status or any lease expiration, so the lease expiry year is unknown.
I searched the remarks for phrases indicating VA loan approval (e.g., 'VA approved', 'VA financing'). The listings do not mention VA financing or approval, so there is no evidence the building is VA-approved.
Searched for terms such as 'fully insured', 'walls-in coverage', 'full insurance', and 'comprehensive building insurance' in the remarks and found no matches. Therefore the data is set to false by default in absence of explicit mention.
No analysis available
Searched the remarks for phrases like 'fire life safety evaluation passed', 'FLSE passed', 'passed fire inspection', and 'life safety compliant' and found no references. With no explicit statement, the field is set to false (absence likely indicates not stated publicly).
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
0 of 5 current listings include 'SUNSET' in view_descriptions and 1 listing explicitly lists VIEW as NONE. None of the public remarks mention 'sunset view', 'western exposure', or related phrases (no quotes available). Given the absence of any remarks and the MLS checkboxes not indicating sunset, there is strong evidence the building should not be listed as offering sunset views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.