Seaside Towers

All 20 MLS records consistently report the building’s year built as 1962. No remarks suggest a different build year or a full reconstruction that would override this, so 1962 is accepted with very high confidence.

Across 20 listings, the highest unit floor reported in the MLS is 16 and no remarks mention any higher floor or a specific total story count. In the absence of explicit 'top floor' or 'X-story building' language, we use the highest observed floor (16) as the building’s floor count with moderate confidence.

No listing remarks mention the total unit count (no phrases like 'XX-unit building' or 'one of XX units'), and the MLS unit-total field is uniformly zero, indicating missing rather than factual data. As a result, the total number of units in the building cannot be determined from the available information.

I searched for explicit owner-occupancy statements (e.g., '80% owner occupied', 'majority owner occupied') and found none. Per rules, the current value of 35.00% is kept but with low confidence because the public remarks do not confirm or deny it.

Public remarks repeatedly reference 'keyed elevators' and secured/gated access, confirming the presence of elevators but never specify how many. Per rules, cannot change the numeric field without an explicit count, so the existing value of 2 is retained with low confidence.

Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.

Remarks emphasize breezes and windows but never mention central air conditioning or AC in the fees. Combined with 0 MLS checks for central AC in association-fee-includes, this strongly indicates central AC is not a fee-included service here.

At least five independent listings mention cable TV as part of the maintenance fee (e.g., 'maintenance fee includes sewer, hot water, cable TV' and 'includes internet, water/sewer, and cable TV'). Together with 14/20 MLS records checking cable, this strongly supports that cable TV service is included in the building’s HOA fees.

The building has shared amenities (pool, BBQ, lobby, elevators) whose power is normally paid from association funds, and many MLS entries mark other common expenses as included. While not explicitly phrased as 'common area electricity' in remarks, it is implied that common-area power is paid through the maintenance fee.

This property is consistently marketed as fee simple rather than a co‑op. With no mention of co‑op structure or co‑op taxes in any remarks or MLS fee-included fields, co‑op taxes are not part of the maintenance fee.

At least two different remarks note that the maintenance fee includes 'an electricity surcharge' together with sewer, hot water, cable TV, or internet. This indicates that some portion of electricity cost is billed through and included in the maintenance fees.

All utility references are to electricity, hot water, water/sewer, cable, and internet; gas is never mentioned. The total absence of gas in both remarks and MLS fee-included fields strongly indicates gas is not included in the maintenance fee.

Remarks directly say that hot water is included in the maintenance fee. Combined with multiple MLS records marking HOTWAT and no evidence of individual water heaters, building-supplied hot water being included in the fees is well supported.

Multiple listings clearly state 'maintenance fee includes internet, water/sewer, and cable TV' or 'includes cable TV, internet and water/sewer', indicating recurring, cross-agent confirmation. Combined with the MLS checkbox data, this provides strong evidence that internet service is included in the HOA fees.

While some units have views of the Ala Wai Canal, golf course, or marina/canal, there is no indication of an on-site marina or boat-slip fees included in dues. The MLS data likewise shows no marina-related inclusions, so marina costs are not part of the maintenance fee.

Remarks include phrases like 'maintenance fee includes sewer, hot water, cable TV' and multiple instances of 'maintenance fee includes ... water/sewer', showing sewer charges are bundled into the HOA. With 17/20 MLS records indicating sewer, there is very strong evidence sewer is included in the maintenance fees.

Several listings explicitly mention 'water/sewer' as part of the maintenance fee, often grouped with internet and cable TV. This repeated wording across different agents, plus 17/20 MLS entries, strongly indicates that water is included in the HOA fees.

Across the provided remarks, at least a dozen listings mention building BBQ facilities, using phrases like "lovely pool and BBQ area," "BBQ grills," and "barbecue area" alongside the pool. Combined with 18/20 current MLS records marking BBQ as an amenity and past high-confidence data, this is strong, consistent evidence that Seaside Towers offers common BBQ/grilling amenities for residents.

At least one listing clearly notes 'Shared bicycle stowage/parking is also available', describing a common-area bike parking/storage facility. Even though the MLS amenity checkbox for bike storage is not used, this explicit remark is strong evidence that bicycle storage is provided in the building.

Units enjoy canal, golf course, and marina/canal views, indicating visual proximity rather than direct waterfront docking. No remarks or MLS data suggest any boat dock, slips, or marina access as a building amenity, so a boat dock can be ruled out.

Parking details (covered, gated, street-level, etc.) are described, yet no remarks reference a car wash facility. The absence of mentions plus no MLS indication strongly suggests there is no car wash amenity.

While amenities like pool, BBQ, lobby, and recreation/lounge area are repeatedly advertised, there is no reference to a separate clubhouse or community center. With the MLS also never marking CLUHOU, it is very unlikely that a distinct clubhouse exists.

Listings highlight an 'on-site resident manager' and a 'welcoming lobby with seating' but never describe concierge or front-desk services. This consistent omission and the lack of MLS concierge checkboxes indicate the building does not offer concierge service.

A remodeled-unit listing specifically says the complex is 'across the street from a new dog park', clearly describing a nearby public facility rather than a building dog area. No listing claims an on-site dog run or pet area, so the building itself does not have a dog park.

Amenities are consistently described (pool, BBQ, resident manager, secured entry, lobby), but no remarks mention a doorman or similar staffed door service. The combination of detailed amenity descriptions and an unchecked doorman field in all MLS records strongly suggests there is no doorman.

Across all provided remarks, amenities like pool, BBQ, surfboard storage, library, and lobby are repeatedly listed but no exercise room or fitness center is ever referenced. Combined with 0/20 MLS entries checking EXEROO, this strongly indicates the building does not offer a gym.

Even though the building is marketed heavily for its location and amenities, there is no mention of any building car service or limo service. Given that such a service would be prominently advertised, and MLS data is negative, this amenity does not exist.

One listing notes a 'library' and another a 'recreation/lounge area', but no description uses terms like meeting room, conference room, or community room. Combined with the MLS data, this suggests the building does not have a dedicated meeting room.

Multiple independent listings describe a pool with BBQ area and outdoor recreation space, using phrases like "lovely pool and BBQ area," "tropical themed pool/lobby area," and "stunning outdoor pool and BBQ area." This strongly suggests a shared outdoor deck/patio around the pool rather than just an indoor amenity. With 9 of 20 current MLS records checking PATDEC/COVPAT, evidence across agents supports that the building provides patio/deck-style outdoor common space.

Remarks highlight being across from Centennial Park Waikiki and near beaches and shopping, but no one advertises a dedicated jogging or walking path as a building amenity. The MLS also does not mark such a feature, so an internal jogging path is very unlikely.

Amenities are extensively described—pool, BBQ, lobby, recreation/lounge area, surfboard storage, library—but there is no reference to any children's playground or tot lot. This, along with MLS data, indicates there is no playground amenity.

Across many listings, amenities repeatedly include pool, BBQ, lobby, storage, and nearby Centennial Park/dog park, but never any private or enclosed yard areas. Combined with zero MLS flags for private yard, this strongly indicates the building does not offer private yard space as an amenity.

Several units mention views of the Ala Wai Golf Course but do not suggest any golf or putting facilities within the building. With no MLS indication of PUTGRE, it is very clear there is no building putting green.

Several remarks emphasize common recreational spaces such as a 'recreation/lounge area', 'tropical themed pool/lobby area', and 'great amenities such as a swimming pool, barbecue area, and lobby.' Together with 2/20 MLS listings marking RECARE, this supports the existence of a shared recreation/amenity area in the building.

A high-floor corner unit listing describes 'great amenities including BBQ grills and recreation/lounge area, swimming pool, resident manager, surfboard storage rack.' This explicit 'recreation/lounge area' reference, supported by one MLS record with RECROO, indicates the building has a shared recreation/lounge room.

The remarks repeatedly mention being steps from restaurants, International Marketplace, and Royal Hawaiian Shopping Center, but none state that there is an on-site restaurant or café within the building. With no MLS support, the building does not offer an in-building restaurant.

Listings focus on the pool, BBQ area, lobby, and views from units, but never refer to a rooftop deck, rooftop terrace, or rooftop amenities. The absence of any rooftop references plus 0 MLS flags makes a rooftop amenity highly unlikely.

In Waikiki, buildings with saunas typically emphasize them alongside pools and gyms, but these remarks never mention a sauna or steam facility. With MLS also showing no SAUNA entries, the building almost certainly lacks a sauna.

Storage is clearly available in this building: numerous listings describe 'locked storage located inside the building', 'dedicated locker downstairs', 'storage space in the basement', 'assigned storage', and 'storage lockers' as part of the property. Current MLS checkbox data (13/20 amenities, 8/20 unit features) aligns with these detailed remarks. Evidence is consistent across many different listings and agents, reinforcing that storage units/lockers are a standing building feature.

Listings repeatedly advertise surfboard storage as an amenity and use explicit phrases like 'surfboard storage' and 'surfboard storage rack', providing strong evidence that surfboard storage is available in the building.

Amenities lists are detailed and repeated across many units, yet none reference any tennis court or tennis facilities. With 0/20 MLS records indicating TENCOU, it is very unlikely that this building has tennis courts.

None of the public remarks explicitly mention a trash or garbage chute, which is typical for this type of utility feature. However, with 6 out of 20 MLS listings marking TRACHU and no contrary evidence, it is reasonably likely the building has a common trash chute system.

Parking is consistently described as assigned covered or street-level stalls in a secured garage, with no references to valet parking or valet service. Given the detailed amenity descriptions and the absence of any MLS valet flag, it is very unlikely the building offers valet.

Several listings describe a 'gated garage' and a 'gated building with secure entryway,' showing that access is controlled by physical gates or barriers. With additional MLS records marking GATED/WALFEN, there is strong, multi-agent evidence of perimeter-style gating or fencing at the property.

Multiple listings describe a 'swimming pool', 'refreshing swimming pool', or 'stunning outdoor pool', with no reference to a separate spa or hot tub. The lack of any 'whirlpool' terminology and no MLS flag indicate there is no whirlpool amenity.

Across these remarks, at least a dozen separate listings explicitly mention a building pool, using phrases like 'swimming pool', 'lovely pool and BBQ area', 'resort-style amenities including a pool', and 'generously sized pool surrounded by lush tropical plantings'. This aligns with MLS amenity checkboxes where 19 of 20 listings indicate a pool. Evidence is strong and consistent across multiple agents and time periods, so Seaside Towers clearly offers a shared building pool.

Multiple listings describe the building’s pool but none call it 'heated' or otherwise suggest temperature control, and 0/20 MLS records flag any heated-pool feature. Given this consistent absence of 'heated' language in both remarks and structured data, the building pool is best classified as unheated.

Searched for 'salt water pool', 'saltwater', 'saline pool'. Listings promote the pool but never describe it as a saltwater pool, so there is no evidence it is salt.

Multiple recent listings clearly advertise in‑unit laundry, using language such as 'Brand-new washer dryer', 'Washer/Dryer in unit', 'washer and dryer in the apartment', 'new stack washer/dryer', and 'in-unit washer/dryer'. This appears across numerous separate listings and agents, not as a single copy‑pasted remark. Combined with MLS data showing 16/20 listings including washer/dryer, this strongly confirms that some units in the building offer in‑unit laundry.

None of the 20 listings mention community or shared laundry facilities, and MLS amenities never include community laundry despite repeatedly listing other building features. Agents consistently highlight in‑unit washer/dryers instead, suggesting there is no separate community laundry room. Evidence supports treating community_laundry as not present for this building.

Searched for terms such as 'coin', 'coin-op', 'paid laundry', 'card operated', 'quarters'. Remarks instead highlight in-unit washers/dryers and do not mention any pay-per-use community laundry.

Searched for phrases like 'laundry on each floor', 'laundry room on every floor', and similar. Listings repeatedly advertise in-unit laundry and never reference community laundry on any floor, so there is no evidence supporting community laundry on every floor.

Multiple listings state the units come with parking, including phrases like 'Parking included with the deed' and 'It comes with 1 parking'. Combined with 18/20 MLS records showing parking, this strongly indicates the building offers on-site parking for at least some units.

Evidence strongly supports that this building offers assigned/deeded parking stalls. At least 8 listings describe a specific stall attached to the unit, using phrases like “Parking included with the deed,” “assigned parking space,” “covered parking stall in the secured garage,” and “1 secured parking stall on the upper deck.” Combined with MLS data showing 14/20 listings marked as ASSIGN, this confirms that parking in this building is reserved/assigned where provided.

Numerous units advertise covered stalls, including wording such as 'covered parking stall in the secured garage' and 'The covered parking stall is on the street level'. This, plus the majority of MLS entries marked as covered/garage, shows the building offers covered parking.

Several remarks explicitly say parking is included with the deed and repeatedly reference assigned/deeded covered parking stalls, supporting that parking is deeded to units.

Across all listings and remarks, there is no reference to EV or electric vehicle charging, and the EVCHRG box is never checked in the MLS data. Given how marketable EV charging is, this strongly suggests the building does not provide EV charging stations.

I searched the remarks for 'parking fee', 'monthly parking', and dollar amounts tied to on-site parking and found no explicit monthly parking fee. Because parking is described as deeded/included, a recurring monthly parking fee is unlikely but not specified.

Agents repeatedly list amenities like pool, BBQ, storage, and secured parking, but never mention guest or visitor parking. Combined with the absence of the GUEST flag in the MLS, this indicates the building does not offer dedicated guest parking.

Listings describe a 'gated garage', 'secured garage', and 'secured, covered parking stall', alongside mentions of a 'secured, well-managed, gated' building. This consistent language across multiple agents supports that parking has secured or gated entry.

Parking is consistently described as single 'parking stall', 'parking space', or 'covered parking stall' without any indication of back-to-back or tandem use. The absence of the TANDEM flag and related wording suggests the building does not offer tandem parking stalls.

Agents highlight many amenities—pool, BBQ, secured parking, storage, resident manager—but never mention valet or attended parking. With no MLS or remark evidence, it is very likely there is no valet parking service at this building.

I searched for terms like 'parking waitlist' and 'waiting list for parking' and found no references. In the absence of mentions, the building appears not to advertise a waitlist, but the absence of evidence yields moderate confidence.

At least one listing directly describes the building as 'gated & w/keyed elevators,' a detailed phrase unlikely to be accidental. Other listings reference 'secured entry,' supporting the presence of controlled-access elevator security as a consistent building feature.

Searched for 'key card', 'card access', 'fob', 'keycard' and similar. The building's security is described as gated and keyed elevators; there is no explicit evidence of card/fob access in the remarks.

None of the listings reference a guard, 24/7 security, or on-site security personnel, even when describing security features like gated access and secured entry. Combined with 0/20 MLS amenity checkboxes for a security guard, this strongly indicates the building does not offer guard service.

Searched for 'security patrol', 'roving security', 'patrol service'. Only an on-site resident manager is repeatedly mentioned, with no references to a security patrol.

Multiple listings describe a 'secure building' and a new fire alarm system but never mention cameras or video surveillance. Given this consistent omission and the lack of MLS security-system checkboxes, video security is unlikely to be a building feature.

Across all provided remarks, there are zero references to central air, HVAC, or any building-wide air conditioning, while 0/20 current MLS entries show ACCEN/CENAC. Agents repeatedly market natural ventilation and breezes instead, implying the building relies on open windows rather than central AC. Given how prominently central AC is usually advertised when present, this strongly supports that central_ac is not offered in this building.

None of the remarks reference split AC, mini-split, or ductless systems, and 0/20 current MLS records have the split AC checkbox selected. Given both the MLS data and the silence in marketing remarks, it is highly likely that units in this building are not generally equipped with split AC systems as a building feature.

Only 1 of 20 MLS entries has the window AC inclusion checked, and none of the public remarks mention window units at all. Given the emphasis on natural ventilation and the lack of consistent, explicit references to window AC, the evidence does not support treating window air conditioners as a building feature at this time.

Across 20 historical listings for Seaside Towers, 17 explicitly list concrete in the MLS construction_materials field, supporting that the building is concrete constructed. Current public remarks do not contradict this and provide no indication of any reconstruction or change in structural material. Given the consistency and the typical construction type for Waikiki high-rises, concrete construction remains highly likely.

Double‑wall construction is scarcely indicated (1/20) and conflicts with the dominant characterization of the building as concrete. The single double‑wall checkbox is likely a mistaken or misunderstood entry rather than describing the primary building method.

A single MLS listing flags hollow tile, and none explicitly contradict it. Given local construction norms for similar concrete towers, it is reasonably likely that hollow tile is part of the building’s construction even if most agents omitted the checkbox.

One listing mentions masonry/stucco via the MLS checkbox, with no contrary remarks or alternative exterior type indicated elsewhere. This sparse but plausible data suggests masonry/stucco is used, likely as exterior finish on a concrete structure.

Steel frame construction is never selected in the construction_materials field across the 20 listings. With multiple agents consistently identifying concrete and no remarks hinting at steel framing, a steel frame structure is very unlikely here.

Several listings (4/20) explicitly note slab construction via the MLS field, and none indicate a different foundation system. Combined with typical local building practice for similar towers, this provides solid evidence that the building is on a concrete slab foundation.

No analysis available

No listings out of 20 indicate wood frame in the construction_materials field, while most mark concrete. For a mid/high‑rise Waikiki condo tower, wood‑frame primary structure would be atypical, so this feature is effectively ruled out.

None of the MLS records flag above‑ground construction, and the remarks describe a conventional Waikiki condo tower with garage and pool, not an elevated or pier‑type structure. Given the consistent omission of this checkbox, this classification does not apply to the building.

Brick is marked in just 2 out of 20 listings, versus a strong consensus for concrete. Public remarks never describe brick construction or a brick building, so it’s unlikely that the building is brick‑constructed in the sense buyers search for.

Single‑wall construction does not appear in any MLS construction_materials entries and would be structurally inconsistent with this type of high‑rise concrete building. The absence across all listings plus building type makes single‑wall construction effectively impossible here.

Listings explicitly state a 30-day minimum rental period, which means short-term/vacation rentals (nights/weekend stays) are not allowed. This is a clear statement in the remarks, so confidence is high.

Because short-term rentals are not permitted (30-day minimum), participation in a hotel rental pool is not applicable. I searched for 'hotel rental pool' and similar phrases and found none.

There is no language indicating a mandatory rental program or required participation; combined with the 30-day minimum restriction, a mandatory hotel rental pool is not present. Searches for 'mandatory', 'required to participate', or 'must be in rental program' returned no hits.

At least two distinct listings explicitly describe the units as 'fee simple' (e.g., 'Great fee simple Waikiki' and 'Fabulous fee simple one bedroom'), indicating Fee Simple ownership exists in this building. No remarks describe any units as leasehold, so the building clearly offers Fee Simple units.

No listings use leasehold-related language or provide lease expiration details, which are normally highlighted when applicable, while several listings emphasize 'fee simple' ownership. Based on the consistent absence of leasehold indications across many listings, it appears the building does not offer leasehold units in the observed data set.

Multiple listings explicitly describe the property as "fee simple," so a leasehold expiry year is not applicable. I searched the remarks for phrases like 'lease expires', 'land lease to', and 'ground lease ends' and found none.

The remarks explicitly mention a VA-assumable rate, indicating the building accepts VA financing or has VA approval. This is direct evidence from the public remarks.

I reviewed remarks for phrases indicating HOA provides full/walls-in insurance; none were present. Maintenance fee inclusions are listed (internet, water/sewer, cable TV, electricity surcharge) but no insurance language, so 'insured_fully' is set to false with medium confidence.

Across all available listings, there are no references to a fire sprinkler system, retrofits, or related assessments, and the MLS amenity for sprinklers is never checked. Given this consistent absence and only a 'new fire alarm system' being noted, it is likely the building does not have a fire sprinkler system.

I searched the remarks for terms like 'FLSE passed', 'fire life safety evaluation passed', and related phrases; none were found. Remarks do note 'The special assessment was for the new fire alarm system was paid in full,' but that does not explicitly state the building passed an FLSE, so the field is set to false with medium confidence.

Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.

No analysis available

At least 3 listings explicitly mention ocean views, including 'stunning city and ocean views' and 'partial ocean view'. Although only 1/20 MLS records are coded with OCEAN, the remarks from different agents confirm that some units in Seaside Towers offer ocean views.

At least 2 listings clearly advertise mountain views, including 'relaxing partial mountain view' and 'mountain views with rainbows'. This is supported by 5/20 MLS records coded with MOUNTA, indicating some units have mountain-facing exposures.

Across 20 listings, none claim a Diamond Head view, and 0 MLS entries are coded for Diamond Head despite detailed view descriptions for several high-floor units. The repeated use of 'Diamond Head side' without mentioning an actual Diamond Head view suggests orientation, not a marketed Diamond Head vista.

Several listings highlight city views, including phrases like 'stunning city and ocean views from the 9th floor', 'city night life', and 'park and city views'. Current MLS data (8 of 20 listings with CITY in the view field) strongly supports that multiple units enjoy city/urban outlooks. Evidence is consistent over time and across different listings/agents.

Agents consistently use generic 'ocean view' language and do not reference 'coastline' or 'shoreline' views in any of the 20 listings. Given this and the lack of any COASTL coding in MLS, coastline views do not appear to be a notable or marketed feature of Seaside Towers.

Remarks describe pleasant green/landscaped outlooks such as 'Overlooking Centennial Park', 'great treetops view', and 'park and city views', along with a pool area 'surrounded by lush tropical plantings'. This indicates that several units enjoy garden/park-style views, so the building should be considered to offer garden views. Evidence is steady with both historical notes and current listings.

Golf course views are advertised in at least 3 separate remarks, specifically referencing the Ala Wai Golf Course. This consistent wording across different units supports that Seaside Towers offers golf course views from some exposures.

At least 3 different listings note canal/marina-type views, such as 'Ala Wai Golf Course and Canal', 'marina/canal', and 'lovely view of the Ala Wai Canal'. These independent descriptions, plus multiple MLS MARCAN codes, confirm that some units have marina/canal-style views.

At least one listing explicitly advertises 'beautiful sunrise' views, with another emphasizing strong morning light. Together with an MLS SUNRIS code, this indicates that some units in Seaside Towers enjoy notable sunrise views.

Across 20 listings, agents highlight sunrise, ocean, city, golf, marina/canal, park, and mountain views but never reference sunsets or related west-facing features. The complete absence of sunset-related remarks or MLS coding suggests sunset views are not a recognized selling point for this building.

All remarks focus on beach, park, canal, golf course, and city vistas, with no hint of any cemetery outlook. The total absence of cemetery references or MLS codes provides strong evidence that cemetery views are not present at this building.

Searched remarks for 'fireworks', 'watch fireworks', and similar phrases. Listings discuss ocean, canal, golf course and city views but do not mention fireworks views from the building.

No analysis available

There are no explicit 'no pets' remarks or MLS flags, and one agent calls out proximity to a new dog park, implying relevance for dog owners. While the exact rules are not spelled out, the absence of no-pet language plus this contextual clue suggests pets are allowed in some form.

At least six distinct listings mention a resident manager with phrases such as 'on-site resident manager' and 'There is an oniste resident manager.' This repeated, explicit language across different agents, together with the RESMAN amenity being checked in most MLS entries, confirms the presence of an on-site resident manager.

Units are marketed as fee simple condos with in-unit washers/dryers, standard resident manager, and 30-day rental minimums, but without any on-site hotel management or rental pool language. The lack of any 'condotel' or hotel-operation references across many agents and MLS entries strongly supports that this is not a condotel building.

Agents consistently describe the properties as 'fee simple' condos, with no reference to buying shares or other co-op terminology. Combined with the lack of cooperative tax/fee flags in MLS, this strongly indicates the building is a condominium, not a co-op.