Seaside Towers

All 20 MLS records consistently report the building’s year built as 1962. No remarks suggest a different build year or a full reconstruction that would override this, so 1962 is accepted with very high confidence.

Across 20 listings, the highest unit floor reported in the MLS is 16 and no remarks mention any higher floor or a specific total story count. In the absence of explicit 'top floor' or 'X-story building' language, we use the highest observed floor (16) as the building’s floor count with moderate confidence.

No listing remarks mention the total unit count (no phrases like 'XX-unit building' or 'one of XX units'), and the MLS unit-total field is uniformly zero, indicating missing rather than factual data. As a result, the total number of units in the building cannot be determined from the available information.

I searched for explicit owner-occupancy statements, such as a percentage or wording like highly owner occupied, but found none. The current value of 35% is retained because there is no remark-based evidence to change it.

I looked for explicit elevator counts such as "2 elevators," "4 elevators," or "multiple elevators," but found none in the remarks. The only elevator-related language confirms keyed elevator access, so the current value of 2 is kept with low confidence.

Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.

Remarks emphasize breezes and windows but never mention central air conditioning or AC in the fees. Combined with 0 MLS checks for central AC in association-fee-includes, this strongly indicates central AC is not a fee-included service here.

Cable TV is strongly supported as included in the maintenance fee. Historical data shows CABTV in 14 of 20 listings, and several remarks say things like “TV/Cable” and “maintenance fee includes cable TV.” The evidence is consistent across multiple listings and agents, so confidence is very high.

The building has shared amenities (pool, BBQ, lobby, elevators) whose power is normally paid from association funds, and many MLS entries mark other common expenses as included. While not explicitly phrased as 'common area electricity' in remarks, it is implied that common-area power is paid through the maintenance fee.

This property is consistently marketed as fee simple rather than a co‑op. With no mention of co‑op structure or co‑op taxes in any remarks or MLS fee-included fields, co‑op taxes are not part of the maintenance fee.

Electricity appears to be included, at least in the form of an electricity surcharge. Remarks state “HOA includes… electricity surcharge” and “maintenance fee includes… electricity surcharge,” matching current MLS inclusions. While not as universally listed as water/sewer, the explicit remarks are strong enough to support inclusion.

All utility references are to electricity, hot water, water/sewer, cable, and internet; gas is never mentioned. The total absence of gas in both remarks and MLS fee-included fields strongly indicates gas is not included in the maintenance fee.

Hot water is supported by both MLS checkbox data and remarks. Current data shows HOTWAT in 6 of 20 listings, and one listing explicitly says the maintenance fee includes “hot water.” This is moderate-to-strong evidence that the building includes hot water in fees.

Multiple listings clearly state 'maintenance fee includes internet, water/sewer, and cable TV' or 'includes cable TV, internet and water/sewer', indicating recurring, cross-agent confirmation. Combined with the MLS checkbox data, this provides strong evidence that internet service is included in the HOA fees.

While some units have views of the Ala Wai Canal, golf course, or marina/canal, there is no indication of an on-site marina or boat-slip fees included in dues. The MLS data likewise shows no marina-related inclusions, so marina costs are not part of the maintenance fee.

Sewer is very likely included in the maintenance fee. Historical MLS data shows SEWER in 16 of 20 listings, and multiple remarks state “water/sewer” or “sewer” is included. The pattern is strong and consistent, suggesting this is a standard building feature.

Water is strongly supported as included in the maintenance fee. Historical data shows WATER in 16 of 20 listings, and several remarks explicitly mention “water/sewer” included. The repeated mention across multiple listings makes this a high-confidence building feature.

BBQ facilities are consistently described across the listings for Seaside Towers. Multiple remarks mention "BBQ grills," "BBQ area," and "barbecue area," and the historical MLS data shows BBQ in 18 of 20 listings, which is very strong evidence. The repeated mentions across many agents look like a real shared building amenity rather than a copy-paste anomaly.

At least one listing clearly notes 'Shared bicycle stowage/parking is also available', describing a common-area bike parking/storage facility. Even though the MLS amenity checkbox for bike storage is not used, this explicit remark is strong evidence that bicycle storage is provided in the building.

Units enjoy canal, golf course, and marina/canal views, indicating visual proximity rather than direct waterfront docking. No remarks or MLS data suggest any boat dock, slips, or marina access as a building amenity, so a boat dock can be ruled out.

Parking details (covered, gated, street-level, etc.) are described, yet no remarks reference a car wash facility. The absence of mentions plus no MLS indication strongly suggests there is no car wash amenity.

While amenities like pool, BBQ, lobby, and recreation/lounge area are repeatedly advertised, there is no reference to a separate clubhouse or community center. With the MLS also never marking CLUHOU, it is very unlikely that a distinct clubhouse exists.

Listings highlight an 'on-site resident manager' and a 'welcoming lobby with seating' but never describe concierge or front-desk services. This consistent omission and the lack of MLS concierge checkboxes indicate the building does not offer concierge service.

A remodeled-unit listing specifically says the complex is 'across the street from a new dog park', clearly describing a nearby public facility rather than a building dog area. No listing claims an on-site dog run or pet area, so the building itself does not have a dog park.

Amenities are consistently described (pool, BBQ, resident manager, secured entry, lobby), but no remarks mention a doorman or similar staffed door service. The combination of detailed amenity descriptions and an unchecked doorman field in all MLS records strongly suggests there is no doorman.

Across all provided remarks, amenities like pool, BBQ, surfboard storage, library, and lobby are repeatedly listed but no exercise room or fitness center is ever referenced. Combined with 0/20 MLS entries checking EXEROO, this strongly indicates the building does not offer a gym.

Even though the building is marketed heavily for its location and amenities, there is no mention of any building car service or limo service. Given that such a service would be prominently advertised, and MLS data is negative, this amenity does not exist.

One listing notes a 'library' and another a 'recreation/lounge area', but no description uses terms like meeting room, conference room, or community room. Combined with the MLS data, this suggests the building does not have a dedicated meeting room.

Evidence is moderate and repeated across many listings, but it appears mostly through copy-pasted amenity descriptions rather than direct mention of a patio or deck. Current remarks from multiple agents reference shared outdoor/common areas like "pool and BBQ area" and "outdoor pool and BBQ area," and the MLS amenities still show PATDEC/COVPAT in 9 of 20 listings. This supports including patio/deck as a building amenity, though not with very high confidence.

Remarks highlight being across from Centennial Park Waikiki and near beaches and shopping, but no one advertises a dedicated jogging or walking path as a building amenity. The MLS also does not mark such a feature, so an internal jogging path is very unlikely.

Amenities are extensively described—pool, BBQ, lobby, recreation/lounge area, surfboard storage, library—but there is no reference to any children's playground or tot lot. This, along with MLS data, indicates there is no playground amenity.

Across many listings, amenities repeatedly include pool, BBQ, lobby, storage, and nearby Centennial Park/dog park, but never any private or enclosed yard areas. Combined with zero MLS flags for private yard, this strongly indicates the building does not offer private yard space as an amenity.

Several units mention views of the Ala Wai Golf Course but do not suggest any golf or putting facilities within the building. With no MLS indication of PUTGRE, it is very clear there is no building putting green.

Several remarks emphasize common recreational spaces such as a 'recreation/lounge area', 'tropical themed pool/lobby area', and 'great amenities such as a swimming pool, barbecue area, and lobby.' Together with 2/20 MLS listings marking RECARE, this supports the existence of a shared recreation/amenity area in the building.

A high-floor corner unit listing describes 'great amenities including BBQ grills and recreation/lounge area, swimming pool, resident manager, surfboard storage rack.' This explicit 'recreation/lounge area' reference, supported by one MLS record with RECROO, indicates the building has a shared recreation/lounge room.

The remarks repeatedly mention being steps from restaurants, International Marketplace, and Royal Hawaiian Shopping Center, but none state that there is an on-site restaurant or café within the building. With no MLS support, the building does not offer an in-building restaurant.

Listings focus on the pool, BBQ area, lobby, and views from units, but never refer to a rooftop deck, rooftop terrace, or rooftop amenities. The absence of any rooftop references plus 0 MLS flags makes a rooftop amenity highly unlikely.

In Waikiki, buildings with saunas typically emphasize them alongside pools and gyms, but these remarks never mention a sauna or steam facility. With MLS also showing no SAUNA entries, the building almost certainly lacks a sauna.

Storage availability is strongly supported for Seaside Towers. Across the remarks, roughly 15+ listings mention it in phrases like 'personal storage locker located on the property,' 'dedicated locker downstairs,' 'assigned storage,' and 'storage locker.' The consistency across multiple agents and wording in both building amenities and unit-level notes makes this a high-confidence building feature.

The remarks repeatedly advertise surfboard storage as an amenity, including "surfboard storage," "surf board storage area," and "surfboard storage rack." This is strong direct evidence that the building provides surfboard storage.

Amenities lists are detailed and repeated across many units, yet none reference any tennis court or tennis facilities. With 0/20 MLS records indicating TENCOU, it is very unlikely that this building has tennis courts.

None of the public remarks explicitly mention a trash or garbage chute, which is typical for this type of utility feature. However, with 6 out of 20 MLS listings marking TRACHU and no contrary evidence, it is reasonably likely the building has a common trash chute system.

Parking is consistently described as assigned covered or street-level stalls in a secured garage, with no references to valet parking or valet service. Given the detailed amenity descriptions and the absence of any MLS valet flag, it is very unlikely the building offers valet.

Several listings describe a 'gated garage' and a 'gated building with secure entryway,' showing that access is controlled by physical gates or barriers. With additional MLS records marking GATED/WALFEN, there is strong, multi-agent evidence of perimeter-style gating or fencing at the property.

Multiple listings describe a 'swimming pool', 'refreshing swimming pool', or 'stunning outdoor pool', with no reference to a separate spa or hot tub. The lack of any 'whirlpool' terminology and no MLS flag indicate there is no whirlpool amenity.

Strong, consistent evidence that Seaside Towers has a shared swimming pool. Across many listings, multiple agents describe it as 'swimming pool,' 'pool and BBQ area,' or 'lovely pool,' which aligns with the MLS amenity data being checked in all 20/20 listings. There is no sign of a correction or removal, and the repeated mentions across different remarks suggest this is a real building feature, not copy-paste error.

Multiple listings describe the building’s pool but none call it 'heated' or otherwise suggest temperature control, and 0/20 MLS records flag any heated-pool feature. Given this consistent absence of 'heated' language in both remarks and structured data, the building pool is best classified as unheated.

I searched for "salt water pool," "saltwater pool," "salt pool," and similar phrases. The building clearly has a pool, but the remarks do not specify that it is saltwater.

Strong evidence that Seaside Towers offers in-unit laundry in at least some units. I found numerous explicit mentions across the remarks, including "washer and dryer in the unit," "Washer/Dryer in unit," "new stack washer/dryer," and "washer/dryer in the apartment," spanning multiple listings rather than a single copied remark. The current MLS pattern of 17/20 listings including washer/dryer is consistent with the public remarks and supports a high-confidence true value.

None of the 20 listings mention community or shared laundry facilities, and MLS amenities never include community laundry despite repeatedly listing other building features. Agents consistently highlight in‑unit washer/dryers instead, suggesting there is no separate community laundry room. Evidence supports treating community_laundry as not present for this building.

I searched for paid-laundry language such as "coin laundry," "coin-op," "quarters," or "card operated." The remarks only describe in-unit laundry or laundry hook-ups, so there is no evidence that community laundry requires payment.

I looked for phrases like "laundry on each floor," "laundry room on every floor," and other floor-by-floor laundry references. The remarks only mention in-unit washer/dryer, a separate laundry room, or laundry hook-ups, which does not confirm community laundry on every floor.

Parking is consistently mentioned in the public remarks across many listings for Seaside Towers. Multiple agents describe it as a 'covered parking stall,' 'secured parking spot,' 'assigned parking space,' and even 'parking included with the deed,' which aligns with the current MLS data showing parking in 17/20 listings. This appears to be a real building feature rather than a copy-paste error.

Strong evidence supports assigned/reserved parking for Seaside Towers. Across the remarks, multiple listings explicitly say "assigned parking space," "assigned parking stall," "deeded parking," or describe a specific stall tied to the unit, which is consistent with the high-confidence historical MLS pattern. This appears to be a genuine building feature, not just a one-off agent checkbox.

Covered parking is strongly supported by both the historical MLS record and the current public remarks. Multiple listings explicitly mention "covered parking stall," "secured garage," and "gated garage," indicating that covered parking is a standard building amenity rather than a copied checkbox. Evidence is consistent across many remarks and agents.

The public remarks repeatedly indicate parking is attached to the unit through the deed or assigned with the unit. This is direct evidence that the parking is deeded/owned rather than merely rented.

Across all listings and remarks, there is no reference to EV or electric vehicle charging, and the EVCHRG box is never checked in the MLS data. Given how marketable EV charging is, this strongly suggests the building does not provide EV charging stations.

I looked for a monthly parking charge, parking rental fee, or a dollar amount tied to on-site parking, but did not find a clear building-imposed parking fee. The only dollar amount mentioned is a seller credit for off-site parking, which is not evidence of a recurring building parking fee.

No evidence in public remarks or current MLS data that guest/visitor parking is provided. None of the listings mention "guest parking" or "visitor parking," and MLS parking checkboxes show zero listings with a GUEST feature, so guest parking is not supported for the building.

The remarks provide clear support for secured parking access and building entry controls. Several listings describe the garage as "secured" or "gated," and one states the building is "gated" with a "secure entryway," while another notes "w/keyed elevators," reinforcing that access control is a real feature. Although fewer listings mention this than covered/assigned parking, the evidence is still strong and consistent.

Parking is consistently described as single 'parking stall', 'parking space', or 'covered parking stall' without any indication of back-to-back or tandem use. The absence of the TANDEM flag and related wording suggests the building does not offer tandem parking stalls.

Agents highlight many amenities—pool, BBQ, secured parking, storage, resident manager—but never mention valet or attended parking. With no MLS or remark evidence, it is very likely there is no valet parking service at this building.

I searched for terms like parking waitlist, waiting list, or join the waitlist for parking, and found nothing in the remarks. With no evidence of a waitlist system, this is marked false at low-to-moderate confidence.

At least one listing directly describes the building as 'gated & w/keyed elevators,' a detailed phrase unlikely to be accidental. Other listings reference 'secured entry,' supporting the presence of controlled-access elevator security as a consistent building feature.

I looked for terms like "key card access," "fob access," "card reader," and "keycard entry." The remarks describe the building as secured, gated, and having keyed elevators, but they do not explicitly confirm a card/fob access system.

None of the listings reference a guard, 24/7 security, or on-site security personnel, even when describing security features like gated access and secured entry. Combined with 0/20 MLS amenity checkboxes for a security guard, this strongly indicates the building does not offer guard service.

I searched for phrases like "security patrol," "patrolled building," and "roving security." The remarks mention a resident manager and a secured building, but no patrol service is described.

Multiple listings describe a 'secure building' and a new fire alarm system but never mention cameras or video surveillance. Given this consistent omission and the lack of MLS security-system checkboxes, video security is unlikely to be a building feature.

Across all provided remarks, there are zero references to central air, HVAC, or any building-wide air conditioning, while 0/20 current MLS entries show ACCEN/CENAC. Agents repeatedly market natural ventilation and breezes instead, implying the building relies on open windows rather than central AC. Given how prominently central AC is usually advertised when present, this strongly supports that central_ac is not offered in this building.

None of the remarks reference split AC, mini-split, or ductless systems, and 0/20 current MLS records have the split AC checkbox selected. Given both the MLS data and the silence in marketing remarks, it is highly likely that units in this building are not generally equipped with split AC systems as a building feature.

Only 1 of 20 MLS entries has the window AC inclusion checked, and none of the public remarks mention window units at all. Given the emphasis on natural ventilation and the lack of consistent, explicit references to window AC, the evidence does not support treating window air conditioners as a building feature at this time.

Seaside Towers is very likely a concrete building. Historical MLS data shows 17/20 listings explicitly listing 'CONCRE' in construction_materials, and none of the public remarks suggest a different construction type. The evidence appears consistent across many listings and looks more like reliable MLS building data than copy-paste noise.

Double‑wall construction is scarcely indicated (1/20) and conflicts with the dominant characterization of the building as concrete. The single double‑wall checkbox is likely a mistaken or misunderstood entry rather than describing the primary building method.

A single MLS listing flags hollow tile, and none explicitly contradict it. Given local construction norms for similar concrete towers, it is reasonably likely that hollow tile is part of the building’s construction even if most agents omitted the checkbox.

One listing mentions masonry/stucco via the MLS checkbox, with no contrary remarks or alternative exterior type indicated elsewhere. This sparse but plausible data suggests masonry/stucco is used, likely as exterior finish on a concrete structure.

Steel frame construction is never selected in the construction_materials field across the 20 listings. With multiple agents consistently identifying concrete and no remarks hinting at steel framing, a steel frame structure is very unlikely here.

Several listings (4/20) explicitly note slab construction via the MLS field, and no current remarks indicate a different foundation system. This is moderate evidence rather than strong confirmation, but it is enough to keep the feature as present for the building. The pattern suggests some listings may be recording foundation details inconsistently.

No analysis available

No listings out of 20 indicate wood frame in the construction_materials field, while most mark concrete. For a mid/high‑rise Waikiki condo tower, wood‑frame primary structure would be atypical, so this feature is effectively ruled out.

None of the MLS records flag above‑ground construction, and the remarks describe a conventional Waikiki condo tower with garage and pool, not an elevated or pier‑type structure. Given the consistent omission of this checkbox, this classification does not apply to the building.

Brick is marked in just 2 out of 20 listings, versus a strong consensus for concrete. Public remarks never describe brick construction or a brick building, so it’s unlikely that the building is brick‑constructed in the sense buyers search for.

Single‑wall construction does not appear in any MLS construction_materials entries and would be structurally inconsistent with this type of high‑rise concrete building. The absence across all listings plus building type makes single‑wall construction effectively impossible here.

A 30-day minimum rental policy indicates short-term rentals are permitted at least at the monthly/longer-stay level. Multiple remarks also frame the unit as suitable for vacation or income use, consistent with STR allowance under the building rules.

I searched for hotel pool terms such as hotel rental program, managed by hotel, Hilton/Trump/Ritz pool, or similar language, and found none. Since there is no public remark indicating a hotel rental pool, this is set to false.

I looked for language showing owners must participate in a rental pool or cannot opt out, but found nothing. With no evidence of a mandatory hotel pool and no remarks suggesting compulsory participation, this is marked false.

At least two distinct listings explicitly describe the units as 'fee simple' (e.g., 'Great fee simple Waikiki' and 'Fabulous fee simple one bedroom'), indicating Fee Simple ownership exists in this building. No remarks describe any units as leasehold, so the building clearly offers Fee Simple units.

No listings use leasehold-related language or provide lease expiration details, which are normally highlighted when applicable, while several listings emphasize 'fee simple' ownership. Based on the consistent absence of leasehold indications across many listings, it appears the building does not offer leasehold units in the observed data set.

I searched the remarks for leasehold wording such as lease expiry year, ground lease end, or renewal dates, but found none. Instead, multiple listings state the property is fee simple, which means there is no lease expiry year to report.

The remarks directly reference a VA assumable rate, which is strong public evidence that VA financing is available/recognized for this building. This is explicit and overrides any prior uncertainty.

I looked for HOA insurance wording such as fully insured, full coverage, walls-in coverage, or comprehensive building insurance, but nothing in the remarks confirms it. Because there is no explicit evidence, this is marked false with low-to-moderate confidence.

Across all available listings, there are no references to a fire sprinkler system, retrofits, or related assessments, and the MLS amenity for sprinklers is never checked. Given this consistent absence and only a 'new fire alarm system' being noted, it is likely the building does not have a fire sprinkler system.

I searched for phrases indicating a fire/life safety evaluation pass, fire safety certification, or a passed fire inspection, but found no direct confirmation. The mention of a paid-in-full fire alarm special assessment suggests safety work occurred, but it does not verify FLSE pass status, so this remains false with moderate confidence.

Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.

No analysis available

At least 3 listings explicitly mention ocean views, including 'stunning city and ocean views' and 'partial ocean view'. Although only 1/20 MLS records are coded with OCEAN, the remarks from different agents confirm that some units in Seaside Towers offer ocean views.

Mountain views are supported by multiple listings for Seaside Towers. Current remarks explicitly say 'relaxing partial mountain view' and 'mountain views with rainbows,' and prior MLS data already showed mountain-related view descriptions, so this appears to be a real building-level offering rather than a one-off error. The evidence is strong and consistent across different listings.

Across 20 listings, none claim a Diamond Head view, and 0 MLS entries are coded for Diamond Head despite detailed view descriptions for several high-floor units. The repeated use of 'Diamond Head side' without mentioning an actual Diamond Head view suggests orientation, not a marketed Diamond Head vista.

Strong evidence across listings: 17 of 20 current MLS listings indicate city views and multiple remarks explicitly state 'stunning city and ocean views', 'city night life' and 'park and city views'. Mentions come from different unit listings/agents and consistently describe city/downtown vistas, so the building-level city view feature is well supported.

Agents consistently use generic 'ocean view' language and do not reference 'coastline' or 'shoreline' views in any of the 20 listings. Given this and the lack of any COASTL coding in MLS, coastline views do not appear to be a notable or marketed feature of Seaside Towers.

Moderate-to-strong evidence: 5 of 20 current MLS listings note garden/courtyard views and multiple remarks mention 'Overlooking Centennial Park', 'great treetops view', and 'lush tropical plantings'. These consistent references across listings indicate some units in the building offer garden/courtyard views.

Golf course views are advertised in at least 3 separate remarks, specifically referencing the Ala Wai Golf Course. This consistent wording across different units supports that Seaside Towers offers golf course views from some exposures.

At least 3 different listings note canal/marina-type views, such as 'Ala Wai Golf Course and Canal', 'marina/canal', and 'lovely view of the Ala Wai Canal'. These independent descriptions, plus multiple MLS MARCAN codes, confirm that some units have marina/canal-style views.

At least one listing explicitly advertises 'beautiful sunrise' views, with another emphasizing strong morning light. Together with an MLS SUNRIS code, this indicates that some units in Seaside Towers enjoy notable sunrise views.

Across 20 listings, agents highlight sunrise, ocean, city, golf, marina/canal, park, and mountain views but never reference sunsets or related west-facing features. The complete absence of sunset-related remarks or MLS coding suggests sunset views are not a recognized selling point for this building.

All remarks focus on beach, park, canal, golf course, and city vistas, with no hint of any cemetery outlook. The total absence of cemetery references or MLS codes provides strong evidence that cemetery views are not present at this building.

I looked for direct references like "fireworks view," "watch fireworks from the lanai," or "see fireworks from unit." The remarks mention ocean, city, park, and canal/golf course views, but nothing indicating a fireworks view from the building.

No analysis available

No analysis available

There are no explicit 'no pets' remarks or MLS flags, and one agent calls out proximity to a new dog park, implying relevance for dog owners. While the exact rules are not spelled out, the absence of no-pet language plus this contextual clue suggests pets are allowed in some form.

At least six distinct listings mention a resident manager with phrases such as 'on-site resident manager' and 'There is an oniste resident manager.' This repeated, explicit language across different agents, together with the RESMAN amenity being checked in most MLS entries, confirms the presence of an on-site resident manager.

Units are marketed as fee simple condos with in-unit washers/dryers, standard resident manager, and 30-day rental minimums, but without any on-site hotel management or rental pool language. The lack of any 'condotel' or hotel-operation references across many agents and MLS entries strongly supports that this is not a condotel building.

Agents consistently describe the properties as 'fee simple' condos, with no reference to buying shares or other co-op terminology. Combined with the lack of cooperative tax/fee flags in MLS, this strongly indicates the building is a condominium, not a co-op.