Sea View
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Sea View
Building Overview
Sea View in Makiki-Tantalus — built 1966; no pets and no short-term rentals, according to MLS data.
About Sea View
Sea View is a residential building located in the Makiki-Tantalus neighborhood. According to available records, the building was constructed in 1966. Size (number of units/square footage) and construction type are not specified in the provided MLS data.
Based on MLS data, key policies for Sea View include a prohibition on pets and a prohibition on short-term rentals. The management company is listed as unknown in the available records. No additional amenity or building feature information is provided in the MLS data supplied.
Buyers should verify details such as unit sizes, construction type, parking availability, maintenance fees, and management arrangements with the listing agent or condominium association, as this summary is based solely on the MLS information provided.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched the public remarks for explicit owner-occupancy statements (percentages or phrases like 'majority owner occupied' or 'highly owner occupied') and found none. With no prior value and no evidence in the remarks, the owner-occupancy percentage is unknown.
The public remarks explicitly describe the unit as a "walk up residence" and include a line implying you won't need to wait for an elevator, which strongly indicates the building lacks elevators. I searched the remarks for explicit elevator counts or terms like 'elevator' or 'four elevators' and found only these references implying stairs rather than elevator service.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
CURRENT MLS shows OTCOEX checked on 2 of 4 listings, but 0 of the public remarks mention "common area electricity", "common electric", or similar language. Remarks focus on plumbing projects, laundry, pool and assessments; there is no explicit confirmation from agents that building maintenance fees include common area electric, so evidence suggests the MLS checkbox is likely inaccurate.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
CURRENT MLS shows SEWER checked on all 4 listings, but 0 of the public remarks explicitly state "sewer included" or "sewer in HOA fees." Public remarks repeatedly reference plumbing/pipe replacement projects but do not say sewer is included in maintenance fees. Given absence of explicit agent statements across listings, the checklist entries appear unverified.
CURRENT MLS shows WATER checked on all 4 listings, but 0 of the public remarks explicitly state "water included" or similar. Remarks emphasize plumbing repairs and laundry facilities but do not indicate water is covered by maintenance fees. The lack of explicit mentions across multiple agent remarks suggests the MLS checkbox entries are likely incorrect.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for terms like 'surfboard storage', 'board storage', or combined 'bike and surfboard storage' and found none. There is no evidence the building offers surfboard storage.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All four current MLS listings have the pool checkbox enabled, and one public remark explicitly notes "the building features a pool on property." While multiple agents may be copying checkbox data, the unanimous MLS indication plus an explicit remark provide moderate-to-high evidence that the building offers a pool.
No analysis available
I searched for terms like 'salt water pool', 'saltwater', 'saline', etc., and found none. While a pool is mentioned, there is no evidence it is a salt pool.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Remarks explicitly describe the community laundry as coin-operated, indicating paid laundry. Confidence is high because 'coin-op' is an unambiguous indicator of payment required.
One statement explicitly claims laundry on each floor, which indicates true. However, a conflicting line specifies coin-op machines only on the 2nd–4th floors, reducing confidence. I flagged the contradiction: evidence supports on-every-floor claim but is inconsistent within the same remarks.
No analysis available
All 4 MLS listings indicate assigned parking and several remarks explicitly state assigned/reserved stalls: "One assigned covered parking space is included" and "parking stall located directly in front of your front door." Evidence is consistent across multiple agent remarks and matches the MLS checkbox, so confidence is high.
At least two of the MLS listings and multiple public remarks explicitly mention covered parking: quoted phrases include "One assigned covered parking space is included" and "Covered Parking Stall, one stall away fr your front door." This corroboration between remarks and MLS checkbox yields high confidence that the building offers covered parking.
The public remarks repeatedly indicate an assigned, included parking stall that accompanies the unit. While the term 'deeded' is not literally used, the repeated language that the stall is 'included' with the unit supports marking parking as deeded/comes with the unit (confidence moderately high).
No analysis available
Searched for 'parking fee', 'monthly parking', or similar phrases. Because parking is described as included/assigned, and no fee language appears, the monthly parking fee is unknown.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched for 'parking waitlist', 'waiting list', or similar; none were found, so parking waitlist is assumed not present with medium confidence.
No analysis available
I searched for references to card/fob/electronic access and found none. In absence of mention, the building is assumed not to advertise card-access security.
No analysis available
I looked for language indicating a security patrol service and found no references. Without explicit mention, there is no evidence the building provides patrol security.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All four current MLS listings (4/4) mark the building's construction material as 'CONCRE', indicating concrete construction across multiple listings. None of the provided public remarks explicitly mention 'concrete' or 'reinforced concrete', so the evidence is based on consistent MLS checkbox data rather than explicit remarks and may reflect agent copy/paste; confidence is therefore moderate (0.80).
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched the remarks for explicit STR language ('short-term rental', 'vacation rental', 'NUC', 'TVU', '30-day minimum' etc.). No such statements were found, so STR allowed is marked false with medium confidence.
Because the remarks contain no references to a hotel rental pool or hotel-managed program, and because STR is not indicated, hotel pool participation is set to false. The listing's mention of a pool is generic and not described as a hotel rental pool.
With no evidence of an STR hotel pool or any mandatory rental program language in the remarks, mandatory participation is set to false. If STR were later shown to be allowed, this would require re-evaluation against any 'mandatory' language.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched for explicit leasehold language and a 4-digit lease expiry year (e.g., 'lease expires 2050', 'land lease to 2065'). No year or leasehold statements were found, so the lease expiry is unknown.
Searched the remarks for phrases indicating VA loan approval (e.g., 'VA approved', 'VA financing', 'VA loans accepted'). No such language was found, so VA financing approval is set to false with medium confidence.
The public remarks explicitly state the association has '100% replacement coverage for hurricanes' and include a 2024-2025 insurance summary, which strongly indicates comprehensive (walls-in) insurance coverage by the HOA.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for phrases such as 'fire life safety evaluation', 'FLSE passed', 'fire safety certified', or 'passed fire inspection' and found no references. Because there is no prior data and no explicit mention in the public remarks, there is no evidence the building has passed an FLSE.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
2 of 4 current listings include CITY in view_descriptions and public remarks explicitly say "captivating city views" (also references to Diamond Head view). Multiple listings mention city-facing vistas, so the building offers units with city views; evidence comes from both MLS view flags and agent remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for phrases like 'fireworks view', 'watch fireworks from', and 'see fireworks from the lanai/unit' and found none. Absence of mention suggests the building does not advertise fireworks views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.