Rycroft Terrace
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Rycroft Terrace
Building Overview
Rycroft Terrace in Ala Moana-Kakaako: concrete building (1963) with pool, window air conditioning and two elevators.
About Rycroft Terrace
Rycroft Terrace is located in the Ala Moana-Kakaako neighborhood. According to available records, the building was constructed in 1963 and is concrete construction. The number of units and total building size are not specified in the provided MLS data.
Key features recorded in the MLS include a community pool, two elevators, and window air conditioning in units. The building construction is noted as concrete and the property appears to have basic elevator service for vertical circulation.
Additional details from MLS: parking is assigned, pets are allowed, and short-term rentals are not permitted. The management company is listed as unknown and no HOA fee information was provided in the dataset. Based on MLS data, buyers should verify current management, fees, parking specifics and any governing rules before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
The listings repeatedly describe the building as having very high owner occupancy and give a specific figure of 90%. That explicit number supports keeping the current value with very high confidence.
The public remarks directly confirm the elevator count with a clear mention of "two elevators." This matches the current building context, so the value is retained with very high confidence.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
Cable is strongly supported across the listings. One remark explicitly says the maintenance fee includes "Spectrum cable and internet," and the current MLS data shows CABTV in 14/18 listings. This looks like a consistent building-level inclusion rather than a one-off agent note.
10/17 MLS entries include OTCOEX (other common expenses), and multiple remarks describe the maintenance fee as covering 'other common expenses' for a building with elevators, pool, and gated grounds, which necessarily require common area electricity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I am setting this to false because the evidence for hot water inclusion is weak and inconsistent. Current MLS data is mixed (6/18 HOTWAT, 2/18 WTRHTR), and the public remarks do not describe hot water as a building-paid utility. The presence of WTRHTR is a strong sign that hot water is not centrally included in the maintenance fee.
MLS data shows 10/17 listings with internet in association_fee_includes, and remarks mention 'Cable, Internet' as part of the standard monthly building fees and that the 'maintenance fee includes ... Spectrum cable and internet.'
No analysis available
Sewer inclusion appears to be a stable building feature. The current MLS data shows SEWER in 16/18 listings, and at least one remark explicitly says the maintenance fee covers "water, sewer & other common expenses." This is consistent across the listings and does not look like a copy-paste anomaly.
Water inclusion is strongly supported by both MLS data and remarks. The current MLS shows WATER in 15/18 listings, and several public descriptions state that the maintenance fee includes water. The evidence is consistent enough to treat this as a building-level inclusion.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is clear evidence that Rycroft Terrace offers outdoor deck/patio-style amenities. At least 2 listings explicitly mention a shared "deck" and one mentions a "lanai" / "open porch," while the current MLS data shows PATDEC/COVPAT checked in 4 of 18 listings. The evidence appears partly agent-copyable, but the repeated mention of a maintained deck area supports including this feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No remarks mention any storage lockers or separate storage rooms, 0/17 MLS listings have storage in building amenities, and the single STORAG flag in unit_features likely refers to in-unit cabinetry rather than a dedicated building storage unit.
I looked for surfboard storage facilities or related storage terms such as board storage or surf storage. The remarks do not mention any such amenity.
No analysis available
Trash chute is weakly supported at best: 2 of 18 current listings have the amenity checked, while the detailed public remarks across many units never mention a trash chute, garbage chute, or refuse chute. Most remarks instead describe other shared features like pool, secured entry, laundry rooms, and elevators, so this appears to be a checkbox-only signal rather than a consistently described building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Pool is strongly supported. Multiple listings explicitly mention a "swimming pool," "community pool," "pool and deck," and "refreshing pool," while the MLS amenities remain marked pool-related in 18/18 listings. The evidence is consistent across many remarks and appears to reflect a real shared building amenity, not just copy-paste checkbox data.
No analysis available
I searched for salt-water pool wording and found only standard pool references. Without explicit public remarks calling it salt water, this cannot be confirmed.
No analysis available
Community laundry is strongly supported across the listing history: 17/18 MLS records include COMLAU, and multiple independent remarks explicitly describe shared laundry access. The clearest descriptions include 'two community laundry rooms per floor,' 'on-site laundry (same floor),' and 'community laundry facilities on each floor,' which indicate this is a building-level amenity rather than a one-off mention.
I looked for references to coin laundry, paid laundry, quarters, card operation, or laundry fees, but found none. The remarks only mention community laundry location, not whether it requires payment.
This is strongly supported by multiple listings describing laundry rooms on every floor. The wording is explicit enough to confirm floor-by-floor community laundry.
Parking is clearly available at the building. Across the remarks, several listings mention "one assigned parking stall," "one open parking stall," "secured parking in the garage," and "gated parking." The repeated mentions across multiple listings strongly support that this is a building-level feature rather than a copy-paste anomaly.
Four MLS listings mark ASSIGN in parking_features, and remarks repeatedly mention 'one assigned parking stall,' '1 covered, assigned parking,' and an 'assigned parking stall,' indicating that stalls are individually designated.
No analysis available
I searched for deeded parking, owned stall, parking included in deed, and similar phrasing. The listings only describe assigned or open stalls, which is not enough to confirm deeded parking.
No analysis available
I looked for any monthly parking fee or additional parking cost, but none was stated. The remarks only mention parking availability and assignment, not a separate parking charge.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for references to a parking waitlist, parking waiting list, or joining a waitlist for parking, but found nothing. The remarks instead suggest parking is available in several units, though not enough to confirm a waitlist system.
No analysis available
The building is clearly described as secure and gated, but I did not find any card/fob-access language. Because the feature requires explicit public-remark evidence, this remains unconfirmed.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for patrol-related security language and found none. The building is described as secure/gated, but that is not the same as having security patrol service.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence that the building offers window air conditioning. Historical MLS data shows ACWIUN in all 18/18 listings, and current remarks explicitly state 'There is a window AC in the unit' plus multiple mentions of 'new AC' or 'new A/C' in renovated units. This is consistent across listings and appears to be reliable, not just copy-paste noise.
Concrete construction is strongly supported across the listing history. One remark explicitly states, 'The concrete construction ensures durability,' and the MLS data remains consistent at 16/18 listings. This looks like reliable building-level information rather than copy-paste noise.
No listing remarks support double wall construction. The feature appears in only 5/18 MLS entries and seems likely to be unchecked/copy-paste noise rather than a verified building characteristic. I am not including it as an established feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is no remark-based evidence for brick construction in the provided listings. The MLS checkbox appears in only 3/18 records, which is too sparse to trust on its own and suggests possible copy-paste or data-entry error. I am treating brick as not established for this building.
No analysis available
I checked for short-term rental keywords such as STR allowed, vacation rental, TVU, NUC, and hotel-rental language, but none were present. Because there is no affirmative STR language in the remarks, I am marking this as not supported by the public text.
I searched for hotel-pool indicators like hotel rental pool, Hilton/Trump/Ritz pool, or managed-by-hotel wording, but found none. Since STR itself is not evidenced in the remarks, a hotel pool is not supported here either.
I looked for phrases such as mandatory rental program, required to participate, cannot opt out, or must be in the pool, but found nothing. With no evidence of a hotel rental program in the first place, mandatory participation is not supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for any ground lease, leasehold, lease expiry, or renewal date language, but the remarks do not provide one. The available remarks instead point to fee simple ownership, so there is no lease-expiry year to extract.
I searched the remarks for VA-specific language such as VA approved, VA financing, and VA loans accepted, but found none. With no public mention, I cannot confirm VA eligibility from these listings.
I looked for insurance-related phrases indicating the building is fully insured or provides walls-in coverage. The remarks do not mention insurance status, so this cannot be confirmed from the provided text.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for fire/life safety evaluation language such as FLSE passed, fire safety certified, life safety compliant, and passed fire inspection. None of those phrases appeared, so there is no public-remarks evidence to confirm this feature.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
City views are clearly supported for this building. Current MLS data shows CITY in 10 of 18 listings, and one listing explicitly mentions "stunning panoramic views of the cityscape" and "city lights." The evidence is strong and repeated, so buyers should consider city-view units available here.
No analysis available
Garden-view evidence is moderate. MLS data currently marks GARDEN in 5 of 18 listings, and remarks repeatedly mention "landscaped grounds," a koi pond, and other landscaped common areas. That suggests some units may overlook garden-like or courtyard-style areas, though the wording is less explicit than for city views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for language like fireworks view, see fireworks from the unit, or watch fireworks from the lanai. The remarks mention city views and proximity to Ala Moana, but nothing about viewing fireworks from the building.
No analysis available
12 of 18 listings include RESMAN in the MLS amenities, but none of the public remarks explicitly say “resident manager,” “on-site manager,” or similar. Because the remarks are silent and the amenity appears only in the checkbox data, this looks like moderate MLS-level evidence rather than strong remark-based confirmation.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.