Royal Queen Emma
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Royal Queen Emma
Building Overview
Royal Queen Emma in Downtown-Chinatown (built 1981) with mountain views, covered assigned parking, no short-term rentals.
About Royal Queen Emma
Based on MLS data, Royal Queen Emma is located in the Downtown-Chinatown neighborhood and was built in 1981. Specific unit sizes and construction details are not provided in the available MLS records.
Key features noted in the MLS include mountain views. The building does not allow pets and short-term rentals are not permitted, according to the listing information. The management company is listed as unknown in the available data.
Additional recorded details include covered, assigned parking. Buyers should verify all information, including unit sizes, construction type, management, fees, and any community rules, as this summary is based solely on MLS data and may be incomplete.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
Four penthouse listings have MLS floor field 8, supporting an 8th residential floor. County and state records list 7 floors, but the listing evidence establishes the penthouse floor; their unit counts are used, not their floor figures.
County records report 24 reconciled residential units, and the state registration independently reports 24 total units for this single-building registration. The currently stored value of 24 is supported.
Owner occupancy from AOUO registration(s) 1276. Refreshed by Real_Estate_Scraper/reb_registry/propagate_owner_occupancy.py, which this lock does not block.
The remarks do not provide any information about the number of elevators. Because there is no current numeric value or explicit evidence, the elevator count remains unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across all 6 current MLS listings for this building, the association_fee_includes field consistently lists OTCOEX, indicating that common area expenses (including common area electricity) are covered by the maintenance fees. None of the public remarks explicitly discuss what utilities are included, and nothing contradicts the MLS data, so the building is treated as including common area electricity in its fees. This appears to be a standard, consistently applied building-level feature rather than a one-off agent error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
In the MLS data, 6/6 listings for this building include SEWER in association_fee_includes, suggesting sewer charges are covered by the HOA/maintenance fees. None of the public remarks mention sewer or utility billing separately, so the consistent MLS pattern is taken as accurate rather than copy-paste error. This supports treating sewer as included in the building’s maintenance fees.
All 6 current MLS listings for this building list WATER under association_fee_includes, implying that water service is paid through the HOA/maintenance fees. The public remarks focus on configuration, finishes, and location and never state that water is separately metered or billed, so the repeated MLS indication is accepted as accurate. This is treated as a building-wide feature rather than an isolated unit-specific arrangement.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Several listings describe 'Each unit has 2 parking, total contiguous 4 stalls,' indicating specific, reserved stalls for each unit. Combined with 6/6 MLS records showing assigned parking, there is strong, consistent evidence across agents that parking is assigned in this building.
At least two listings explicitly say 'Each unit has 2 covered parking stalls for a total of 4 contiguous stalls,' clearly indicating covered parking. With all 6 current MLS entries also coded for covered/garage parking, the evidence is strong and consistent that the building provides covered parking stalls.
Multiple listings explicitly associate two covered parking stalls with each unit, indicating that parking is provided with the units. The remarks do not use the word "deeded," so confidence is moderate rather than high.
No analysis available
The remarks were searched for parking fees, monthly charges, rental costs, and dollar amounts. No fee is identified for the two unit-associated stalls, although separate additional parking was rented nearby.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The listings describe two covered stalls per unit and separately rented off-site parking. They contain no indication that parking is subject to a waitlist.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Double-wall construction (DOUWAL) appears on every current MLS listing for this building, indicating consistent agent input across units. The remarks do not discuss wall construction at all, and nothing contradicts the uniform MLS data, supporting a high-confidence inclusion.
No analysis available
Four of six current MLS listings mark masonry/stucco (MASSTU) for this building, with no remarks referencing an alternate construction type. The remarks focus on zoning, layout, and upgrades but do not contradict masonry/stucco construction, so the MLS pattern is followed.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks describe residential and office use and mention that one unit is currently leased, but do not authorize short-term rentals. Because no supporting STR language appears, STR allowance is treated as false with moderate-low confidence.
The remarks were searched for hotel pool, hotel rental program, hotel-managed, and branded rental-pool references. None were found, and the prerequisite of permitted STR use is not met.
The listings contain no language requiring units to enter a rental or hotel pool. Since STR allowance and hotel-pool participation are not supported, mandatory pool participation is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks were searched for lease-expiry language, leasehold terms, ground-lease references, and four-digit expiry years. No specific lease expiration year or renewal date was provided.
The remarks were searched for terms such as "VA approved," "VA financing," and "VA loans accepted." None were found, so there is no public-remarks evidence that the building is VA loan approved.
The remarks contain no evidence about the building's insurance coverage. Since there is no current true value and no explicit mention of full or walls-in insurance, this is treated as false with medium confidence.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit references to FLSE passage, fire/life safety certification, passed fire inspection, or life-safety compliance. None were found; 'fire sprinklers' alone does not establish that the evaluation was passed.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across recent MLS data for this building, 2 of 6 listings include 'Mountain' in the view_descriptions field and none report 'None', indicating that some units enjoy mountain views. While the public remarks here focus on mixed residential/office use and location rather than views, the repeated mountain view checkbox usage across multiple listings supports that buyers can find mountain-view units in this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.