Royal Queen Emma
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Royal Queen Emma
Building Overview
Royal Queen Emma in Downtown-Chinatown (built 1981) with mountain views, covered assigned parking, no short-term rentals.
About Royal Queen Emma
Based on MLS data, Royal Queen Emma is located in the Downtown-Chinatown neighborhood and was built in 1981. Specific unit sizes and construction details are not provided in the available MLS records.
Key features noted in the MLS include mountain views. The building does not allow pets and short-term rentals are not permitted, according to the listing information. The management company is listed as unknown in the available data.
Additional recorded details include covered, assigned parking. Buyers should verify all information, including unit sizes, construction type, management, fees, and any community rules, as this summary is based solely on MLS data and may be incomplete.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit statements like '80% owner occupied' or 'majority owner occupied' but found none. The remarks include 'Currently being leased' for one unit, which does not provide an overall owner-occupancy percentage. Because there is no explicit numeric information, the owner_occupancy is unknown (null) with low confidence.
I searched the public remarks for explicit phrases like '4 elevators', 'four elevators', or 'multiple elevators' but found no references. Because there is no explicit numeric statement and no current value provided, I cannot infer a number and therefore return null with low confidence.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across all 6 current MLS listings for this building, the association_fee_includes field consistently lists OTCOEX, indicating that common area expenses (including common area electricity) are covered by the maintenance fees. None of the public remarks explicitly discuss what utilities are included, and nothing contradicts the MLS data, so the building is treated as including common area electricity in its fees. This appears to be a standard, consistently applied building-level feature rather than a one-off agent error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
In the MLS data, 6/6 listings for this building include SEWER in association_fee_includes, suggesting sewer charges are covered by the HOA/maintenance fees. None of the public remarks mention sewer or utility billing separately, so the consistent MLS pattern is taken as accurate rather than copy-paste error. This supports treating sewer as included in the building’s maintenance fees.
All 6 current MLS listings for this building list WATER under association_fee_includes, implying that water service is paid through the HOA/maintenance fees. The public remarks focus on configuration, finishes, and location and never state that water is separately metered or billed, so the repeated MLS indication is accepted as accurate. This is treated as a building-wide feature rather than an isolated unit-specific arrangement.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Several listings describe 'Each unit has 2 parking, total contiguous 4 stalls,' indicating specific, reserved stalls for each unit. Combined with 6/6 MLS records showing assigned parking, there is strong, consistent evidence across agents that parking is assigned in this building.
At least two listings explicitly say 'Each unit has 2 covered parking stalls for a total of 4 contiguous stalls,' clearly indicating covered parking. With all 6 current MLS entries also coded for covered/garage parking, the evidence is strong and consistent that the building provides covered parking stalls.
Every listing repeatedly says each unit 'has' two covered parking stalls / 'Each unit has 2 parking', which strongly indicates the stalls are provided with the units (deeded/owned with unit) rather than only rentable. No language suggested monthly parking rentals for those stalls.
No analysis available
I searched for terms like 'parking fee', 'monthly parking', or dollar amounts and found none. The remarks note additional off-site parking was rented but provide no fee details, so monthly parking fee is unknown.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for 'parking waitlist', 'waiting list', or similar phrases and found none. The remarks describe available stalls with the unit and off-site rented parking, not a waitlist system.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Double-wall construction (DOUWAL) appears on every current MLS listing for this building, indicating consistent agent input across units. The remarks do not discuss wall construction at all, and nothing contradicts the uniform MLS data, supporting a high-confidence inclusion.
No analysis available
Four of six current MLS listings mark masonry/stucco (MASSTU) for this building, with no remarks referencing an alternate construction type. The remarks focus on zoning, layout, and upgrades but do not contradict masonry/stucco construction, so the MLS pattern is followed.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for indications that short-term or vacation rentals are permitted and found no supporting language. Given absence of any STR references, STR is not supported by the public remarks.
I searched for 'hotel rental pool', 'hotel program', or brand-managed rental language and found none. Because STRs are not referenced, there is no evidence of hotel-pool participation.
I looked for wording like 'mandatory rental pool', 'required to participate', or 'must be in rental program' and found none. With no hotel pool present or STR allowance indicated, mandatory participation is not supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for phrases such as 'lease expires', 'land lease to', 'leasehold expiring in', or specific years and found no references. Therefore the lease expiry year is unknown from these remarks.
I searched all remarks for terms like 'VA approved', 'VA financing', or 'VA loans accepted' and found none. With no evidence in the listings, VA approval is assumed not stated.
I looked for explicit language indicating the HOA or building carries full (walls-in) insurance coverage such as 'fully insured', 'full insurance', or 'walls-in coverage' and found none. With no explicit mention and no current value provided, I report false with medium confidence.
No analysis available
I searched for phrases such as 'fire life safety evaluation passed', 'FLSE passed', or 'passed fire inspection'. The remarks include 'fire sprinklers' but contain no explicit statement that the building passed a fire/life safety evaluation, so I report false with medium confidence (absence of an explicit pass statement).
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across recent MLS data for this building, 2 of 6 listings include 'Mountain' in the view_descriptions field and none report 'None', indicating that some units enjoy mountain views. While the public remarks here focus on mixed residential/office use and location rather than views, the repeated mountain view checkbox usage across multiple listings supports that buyers can find mountain-view units in this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.