Royal Palm at Waipio I
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Royal Palm at Waipio I
Building Overview
Royal Palm at Waipio in Waipahu — concrete construction, built 1987; pets allowed, short-term rentals not permitted.
About Royal Palm at Waipio I
Royal Palm at Waipio I is located in the Waipahu neighborhood and was built in 1987. According to available records, the building is constructed of concrete. Specific unit sizes, number of units, and building height are not provided in the available MLS data.
Based on MLS data, the building allows pets and does not permit short-term rentals. The listing information does not include details about on-site amenities, common areas, or unit features; prospective buyers should request full amenity and feature lists from the seller or managing agent.
Management company, parking arrangements, maintenance fees, and other policies are listed as unknown or are not included in the MLS-derived data. This summary is based on MLS data; buyers should verify all facts, fees, rules, and availability of amenities with the listing agent or management prior to making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit owner-occupancy information, including percentages such as '80% owner occupied' and qualitative phrases like 'mostly owner occupied' or 'highly owner occupied.' The remarks do not provide any owner-occupancy data, so this remains unknown.
I reviewed all remarks for explicit elevator references, including counts and generic wording such as 'multiple elevators,' but found none. Because the listings consistently describe ground-floor, first-floor, or second-floor units with no building elevator details, the elevator count remains unknown from the public remarks.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No public remarks in any of the 10 listings mention 'common area electricity', 'building power', or similar. Although 8/10 current MLS records list OTCOEX in association_fee_includes (per provided MLS data), there is no corroborating language in agent remarks and no prior confidence history, so evidence for common-area electricity being included is weak and likely due to checklist copy/paste.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
None of the listings (0/9) list HOTWAT in association_fee_includes and six listings list WTRHTR in inclusions (suggesting unit water heaters). No remarks state 'hot water included' or similar. Given the MLS checkboxes and repeated WTRHTR inclusions across multiple listings, there is strong evidence the HOA does not include building-supplied hot water.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer appears to be included in the HOA/association fees. The strongest public remark states dues cover "water, sewer, and trash," and the current MLS data is fully consistent at 11/11 listings. This looks like a stable building-level fee inclusion rather than a one-off agent entry.
Water appears to be included in the HOA/association fees. A public remark explicitly lists "water" as included, and current MLS data is unanimous at 11/11 listings. The evidence is strong and consistent across multiple listings, suggesting a reliable building-level feature.
Strong evidence across listings: at least 7 of the 10 remarks explicitly reference BBQ (phrases include 'BBQ area', 'BBQ Amenities', and 'host casual weekend BBQs'). This is consistent with prior MLS data (9/10). Mentions appear across different agent remarks, suggesting a real common-area amenity rather than a single copy/paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Clubhouse is supported by the remarks, though not mentioned in most listings. At least 1 listing explicitly says the community has a "clubhouse," and another says the unit is a walk away from the "Club house, pool and BBQ Amenities." The evidence suggests a shared community amenity that may be copy/pasted in some remarks, but it is still directly confirmed.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Well-supported: about 5 of the 10 remarks explicitly mention walking/jogging paths (quotes include 'walking paths', 'walk/jog path', and 'walking/jogging paths'), consistent with prior MLS checkbox prevalence. Mentions come from multiple agents and listings, indicating a genuine building/community amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings (about 4 of 10) explicitly mention 'recreation area' or 'access to the community pool and recreation area.' These are direct mentions in agent remarks and align with MLS amenity checks, indicating a building-level recreation area amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
At least 3 listings mention storage-related features: phrases include “private upgraded patio/yard and storage,” “open covered lanai with additional storage space,” and “additional storage space.” MLS checkbox data also shows storage present in a subset of listings (1/10 amenities, 4/10 unit_features), suggesting some units in the building offer storage/lockers rather than a building-wide guaranteed locker system.
I searched for surfboard-related storage amenities and related phrasing such as board storage or surf storage. The remarks only mention general unit storage in one listing, which is not enough to support surfboard storage.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Pool is strongly supported across the listings and appears to be a shared building/community amenity. Multiple remarks from different listings explicitly mention the pool, including "the complex pool," "there is a pool," "access to the community pool," and "the pool is currently being renovated." This is consistent with the historical MLS data and does not look like a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit salt-water pool wording such as "saltwater pool" or "salt pool." The remarks mention a community pool, but there is no evidence that it is salt water.
Evidence is very strong that Royal Palm at Waipio offers in-unit laundry. At least 8 listings explicitly mention washer/dryer or in-unit laundry, and the language is consistent across multiple remarks rather than a single agent's copy-paste. Current MLS inclusion data also aligns with the remarks, reinforcing high confidence.
No analysis available
I looked for wording such as coin laundry, paid laundry, card-operated machines, or quarters. The public remarks only reference in-unit laundry, so there is no evidence of a paid community laundry room.
I searched for language like "laundry on each floor," "every floor," or a community laundry room on the floor-by-floor level. The remarks only mention in-unit washer/dryer or washer/dryer hookups, which does not support community laundry on every floor.
No analysis available
Assigned parking is strongly supported across the listings. Multiple remarks explicitly say "one assigned parking stall," "1 parking," and "2 STALLS," with one unit noting the stall is directly in front of the home. The repeated wording across several listings suggests this is a real building feature, not just a checkbox copy-paste.
Covered parking is very well supported across the listings. Several remarks explicitly state "covered parking stall" or "designated covered parking stall," and the historical MLS data also shows covered/garage parking in most listings. The consistency across multiple remarks makes this feature highly reliable.
I searched for wording such as "deeded parking," "owned stall," or "parking included in the deed." The listings describe assigned/covered stalls and extra visitor parking, but nothing that confirms deeded parking.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit parking charges, parking rental language, or any monthly parking cost. None of the public remarks mention a fee, so no parking fee can be extracted from the listings.
Guest parking is available: at least a couple of current remarks explicitly mention 'guest parking' or 'nearby guest parking offers added flexibility', and this aligns with prior MLS data that frequently included guest parking. Evidence is consistent across listings though less pervasive than assigned/covered.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for phrases like "parking waitlist," "waiting list," or instructions to join a list for parking. The remarks do not mention any waitlist system.
No analysis available
I looked for access-control language like card access, fob entry, keycard systems, or electronic building entry. The remarks mention security patrol and on-site management, but not a card-based security system.
Security is strongly supported for this building. Multiple recent listings mention it explicitly, including "security patrol throughout," "on-site security," "resident manager, and security," and "24 hr patrolling security." The MLS amenity is also consistent across all current listings, so this appears to be a real building feature rather than copy-paste noise.
This feature is directly confirmed in the public remarks several times. The listings explicitly state security patrol, including 24-hour patrolling security, so this is a strong match.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Window AC is strongly supported across the listings. At least 3 remarks explicitly mention it, including phrases like 'Window AC in living and main bedroom,' 'brand new window ACs,' and 'window A/C units in each bedroom.' This appears consistent across multiple agents and is not just a copied checkbox.
No analysis available
Double-wall construction appears to be a consistent building-level MLS attribute: 9 of 12 current listings list DOUWAL, and prior MLS history was also strong. None of the public remarks explicitly mention 'double wall' or similar wording, so this is supported primarily by the MLS construction field rather than agent remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
5 of 10 MLS records indicate a concrete slab foundation (SLAB). No public remarks explicitly mention 'concrete slab' or 'solid concrete foundation,' so the claim rests on MLS checkbox prevalence and should be treated as implied rather than explicitly documented.
No analysis available
Wood-frame construction appears to be supported by the MLS data: 7 of 11 current listings include WOOFRA, and earlier records showed 6 of 10 doing the same. None of the public remarks explicitly mention wood frame construction, so this is supported mainly by repeated MLS entries rather than agent commentary.
Only 2 of 9 MLS records currently indicate 'above ground' construction, yet none of the public remarks mention 'above ground construction' or equivalent. Given the absence of explicit remarks or user verification, the MLS checkbox entries appear unreliable and there is insufficient evidence that the building uses above-ground construction materials.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for indicators that short-term rentals are allowed, including STR/NUC/TVU references and vacation-rental wording. The remarks contain no evidence that STR is permitted, so it is treated as not indicated.
I searched for hotel pool references such as hotel rental program, managed by hotel, or participation in a brand pool. None were found, and there is no evidence supporting STR allowance.
I looked for wording like mandatory hotel pool, required rental program, or cannot opt out. The remarks do not indicate any rental pool arrangement, so mandatory participation is not supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for leasehold references like "lease expires [year]," "ground lease ends," "renewed through," or similar wording. The public remarks do not mention any land tenure lease expiry year, so it remains unknown.
I searched the remarks for explicit VA loan language such as "VA approved" or "VA financing accepted" and found none. With no public remark evidence, this is treated as not indicated in the listings.
I looked for insurance-related wording like 'fully insured,' 'full insurance,' 'walls-in coverage,' or 'comprehensive building insurance,' and found nothing. The remarks mention HOA dues and amenities, but they do not describe the building’s insurance coverage.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for fire/life safety language such as 'FLSE passed,' 'life safety compliant,' 'fire safety certified,' and 'passed fire inspection,' but there were no matches. Nothing in the public remarks confirms or denies that the building has passed a fire/life safety evaluation.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
At least 2 of the 10 current listings explicitly state garden views (e.g., "lanai overlooking lush garden views" and "lanai with beautiful garden views"). MLS view_descriptions list GARDEN for 1/10 and NONE for 4/10, but multiple public remarks across different listings confirm garden views for some units. Evidence is not unanimous across all agents (some listings say only "peaceful view" or none), but the explicit mentions indicate the building does offer garden-view units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No current listing remarks explicitly mention sunset views, and the MLS view field is overwhelmingly NONE or non-sunset descriptions. Across the provided remarks, agents consistently describe garden, peaceful, natural-light, or general neighborhood views, which does not support a sunset-view feature.
No analysis available
I searched for direct references to seeing Friday night fireworks from the building or from a unit/lanai. The remarks do not mention fireworks views, only general views like garden or peaceful outlooks.
No analysis available
The evidence strongly supports a resident manager at the building. Current remarks explicitly mention 'resident manager' and 'Property Manager on Site,' and the MLS amenities show RESMAN in 11 of 12 listings. This appears consistent across multiple listings/agents, not just a one-off copy-paste entry.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.