Royal Palm at Waipio I
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Royal Palm at Waipio I
Building Overview
Royal Palm at Waipio in Waipahu — concrete construction, built 1987; pets allowed, short-term rentals not permitted.
About Royal Palm at Waipio I
Royal Palm at Waipio I is located in the Waipahu neighborhood and was built in 1987. According to available records, the building is constructed of concrete. Specific unit sizes, number of units, and building height are not provided in the available MLS data.
Based on MLS data, the building allows pets and does not permit short-term rentals. The listing information does not include details about on-site amenities, common areas, or unit features; prospective buyers should request full amenity and feature lists from the seller or managing agent.
Management company, parking arrangements, maintenance fees, and other policies are listed as unknown or are not included in the MLS-derived data. This summary is based on MLS data; buyers should verify all facts, fees, rules, and availability of amenities with the listing agent or management prior to making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
There are no qualitative or quantitative statements about owner-occupancy in the public remarks. Because no current percentage was provided and no explicit evidence exists, the owner-occupancy percentage is unknown.
There is no explicit reference to any elevators in the public remarks. Because no current numeric value was provided and no remarks mention elevators, the number is unknown and cannot be inferred.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
None of the listings (0/9) list HOTWAT in association_fee_includes and six listings list WTRHTR in inclusions (suggesting unit water heaters). No remarks state 'hot water included' or similar. Given the MLS checkboxes and repeated WTRHTR inclusions across multiple listings, there is strong evidence the HOA does not include building-supplied hot water.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All nine listings (9/9) have SEWER in association_fee_includes and the remarks explicitly state 'HOA dues... covering ... water, sewer, and trash.' The consistency across all MLS entries and an explicit remark confirming 'sewer' is included provides strong, corroborated evidence that sewer is included in the maintenance fee.
All nine listings (9/9) list WATER in association_fee_includes and at least one public remark explicitly notes 'HOA dues... covering community amenities along with water, sewer, and trash.' The uniform MLS checkbox data plus the explicit remark provides strong, corroborated evidence that water is included in the HOA/maintenance fee.
BBQ is mentioned explicitly in 5 of the 9 listing remarks with phrases like 'BBQ area', 'BBQ Amenities', and 'host casual weekend BBQs'. Current MLS checkbox also shows 8/9 listings with BBQ. The repeated explicit mentions across different listings indicate a genuine shared BBQ/grilling facility rather than a single copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Walking/jogging paths are referenced in 3 of the 9 listing remarks with phrases like 'walking paths', 'walk/jog path', and 'walking/jogging paths', and the MLS checkbox is set on 8/9 listings. The evidence is consistent but not ubiquitous across remarks, suggesting the amenity likely exists but with moderate confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for terms like 'surfboard', 'board storage', 'surf storage', and similar. There is no evidence of dedicated surfboard storage in the remarks, so surfboard_storage is set to false with medium confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
MLS checkbox indicates pool across all 9 listings and a majority of agent remarks (at least 7 of 9) explicitly mention a pool — e.g., 'community offers a pool', 'walk away from the Club house, pool and BBQ', and 'access to association pool'. Evidence is consistent across multiple listings and agents (one notes the pool is 'currently being renovated'), so confidence is high that the building has a shared pool.
No analysis available
I searched for terms like 'salt water pool', 'saltwater', or 'salt pool' in the public remarks. There is no evidence the pool is salt water; because no pool-type is specified, pool_salt is set to false with medium confidence.
Multiple listings (6 of 9) explicitly mention in-unit laundry—phrases include 'new washer and dryer', 'in-unit laundry', and 'Full size Washer/Dryer'—and the MLS checkbox is set for 8 of 9 units. One listing only notes indoor washer/dryer hookups (not appliances), but overall the evidence from several agents and the MLS indicates the building offers units with in-unit laundry.
No analysis available
I searched for 'coin', 'coin-op', 'card', 'paid laundry', and similar terms. There is no evidence of paid/coin-operated community laundry in the public remarks; listings emphasize in-unit laundry, so this feature is set to false with medium confidence.
I searched the remarks for phrases like 'laundry on each floor', 'laundry room on every floor', and similar floor-by-floor laundry wording. Multiple listings explicitly state in-unit laundry or washer/dryer hookups but none state community laundry on every floor, so this feature is set to false with medium confidence.
No analysis available
Multiple listings explicitly reference assigned or designated stalls — e.g., 'One assigned parking stall', 'designated covered parking stall', and units noted as having '2 STALLS'. This is supported by current MLS checkbox prevalence (8/9), and the remarks across different agents consistently mention assigned or reserved stalls.
Remarks repeatedly reference covered parking — examples include 'designated covered parking stall' and 'covered parking stall'. Combined with heavy MLS checkbox support (8/9), evidence is strong that the building offers covered parking stalls.
I searched for explicit wording that parking is deeded (e.g., 'deeded parking', 'owned stall'). While multiple listings note assigned/covered stalls and 'designated' parking, none state the parking is deeded, so there is no evidence parking is deeded.
No analysis available
I searched for phrases like 'parking fee', 'monthly parking charge', or 'parking rental'. The listings only mention assigned or covered stalls and guest parking; no fees are described, so monthly parking fee is unknown (no evidence).
Guest parking is mentioned in some remarks (e.g., 'nearby guest parking offers added flexibility' and references to guest parking in community amenities). While MLS checkboxes also indicate guest parking (7/9), the public remarks provide moderate but not overwhelming corroboration, so confidence is moderate.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for any indication of a parking waiting list system. Listings describe assigned stalls and nearby guest parking but do not mention a waitlist; therefore there is no evidence a parking waitlist exists.
No analysis available
I searched for 'key card', 'fob', 'card reader', 'electronic access', and similar terms. With only mentions of on-site management and patrols and no explicit card/fob access language, security_card is set to false with medium confidence.
All 9 current listings show the SECGUA amenity and several remarks explicitly reference security: phrases include 'security patrol', 'on-site security', 'resident manager', and '24 hr patrolling security'. The consistency across multiple agent remarks and the uniform MLS checkbox indicates the building offers security guard/patrol services.
Several listings explicitly mention security patrol service and 24-hour patrolling security, indicating a patrolled building. This repeated language across listings provides high confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence that some units have window ACs: 2 separate listing remarks explicitly state 'brand new window ACs' and 'window A/C units in each bedroom'. Additionally, 5 of 9 current MLS listings have ACWIUN in inclusions. This indicates the building offers units with window air conditioners (some agents mention them explicitly and MLS checkboxes support that some units have them).
No analysis available
Although 7 of 9 MLS records currently list DOUWAL, none of the public remarks across the listings mention 'double wall', 'double-wall construction', or 'two walls'. With no user verification or explicit remarks describing this construction, the MLS checks appear likely to be agent checkbox copy/paste and do not provide reliable evidence that the building has double-wall construction.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Only 2 of 9 MLS records currently indicate 'above ground' construction, yet none of the public remarks mention 'above ground construction' or equivalent. Given the absence of explicit remarks or user verification, the MLS checkbox entries appear unreliable and there is insufficient evidence that the building uses above-ground construction materials.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for explicit STR-permitting language, NUC/TVU references, or minimum-night policies. None of the public remarks permit or describe short-term/vacation rentals, so there is no evidence STRs are allowed in this building.
I searched for phrases like 'hotel rental pool', 'hotel rental program', or hotel brand management. No listings mention any hotel rental pool; since STRs are not indicated as allowed, hotel-pool participation is not applicable.
I looked for wording such as 'mandatory hotel pool', 'required to participate', or 'cannot opt out'. None of the public remarks mention any mandatory rental-pool requirement, and because short-term rentals are not shown as allowed, mandatory participation is not applicable.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for explicit leasehold language and years (e.g., 'lease expires 2050', 'land lease to 2065', 'leasehold expiring in 2040'). None of the listings mention a land lease or expiry year, so the expiry year is unknown.
I searched all public remarks for explicit phrases indicating VA loan approval (e.g., 'VA approved', 'VA financing accepted'). No listings mention VA approval or related wording, so there is no evidence the building is VA-approved.
The remarks list HOA amenities and what HOA dues cover (water, sewer, trash) and on-site management/security, but do not state that the building is fully insured or has walls-in coverage. With no explicit mention, reporting false with medium confidence.
No analysis available
The public remarks contain no statement that the building passed a fire/life safety evaluation or inspection. In the absence of any mention and no current value, defaulting to false with medium confidence per rules (absence likely indicates not stated).
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across 9 public remarks none reference 'sunset', 'western exposure', 'evening sun', or similar—examples only note a 'peaceful view', 'garden views', or 'no other units behind you'. CURRENT MLS also shows 0/9 listings with SUNSET and 4/9 marked NONE. With no explicit mentions and MLS checkboxes unchecked, there is strong evidence the building does not offer documented sunset views.
No analysis available
I searched for phrases like 'fireworks view', 'watch fireworks from lanai', or 'see fireworks from unit'. There are no such mentions in the remarks, so fireworks_view is set to false with medium confidence.
No analysis available
MLS checkbox data indicates 8 of 9 listings list RESMAN. Public remarks in at least 4 listings explicitly state 'resident manager', 'Property Manager on Site', or 'resident manager... security', supporting the MLS entries. Evidence is consistent across multiple agents and listings with no clear contradiction, so the building is very likely to have an on-site/resident manager.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.