Royal Palm at Waipio I
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Royal Palm at Waipio I
Building Overview
Royal Palm at Waipio in Waipahu — concrete construction, built 1987; pets allowed, short-term rentals not permitted.
About Royal Palm at Waipio I
Royal Palm at Waipio I is located in the Waipahu neighborhood and was built in 1987. According to available records, the building is constructed of concrete. Specific unit sizes, number of units, and building height are not provided in the available MLS data.
Based on MLS data, the building allows pets and does not permit short-term rentals. The listing information does not include details about on-site amenities, common areas, or unit features; prospective buyers should request full amenity and feature lists from the seller or managing agent.
Management company, parking arrangements, maintenance fees, and other policies are listed as unknown or are not included in the MLS-derived data. This summary is based on MLS data; buyers should verify all facts, fees, rules, and availability of amenities with the listing agent or management prior to making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit owner-occupancy information, including percentages like "80% owner occupied" and qualitative wording like "mostly owner occupied," but found none. Without direct evidence in the remarks, the owner-occupancy rate remains unknown.
I reviewed the remarks for any explicit elevator references, including counts or phrases such as "multiple elevators," but found none. Because elevator information is only reliable when directly stated in the listing remarks, the feature remains unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No public remarks in any of the 10 listings mention 'common area electricity', 'building power', or similar. Although 8/10 current MLS records list OTCOEX in association_fee_includes (per provided MLS data), there is no corroborating language in agent remarks and no prior confidence history, so evidence for common-area electricity being included is weak and likely due to checklist copy/paste.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
None of the listings (0/9) list HOTWAT in association_fee_includes and six listings list WTRHTR in inclusions (suggesting unit water heaters). No remarks state 'hot water included' or similar. Given the MLS checkboxes and repeated WTRHTR inclusions across multiple listings, there is strong evidence the HOA does not include building-supplied hot water.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer appears to be included in the HOA/association fees. The strongest public remark states dues cover "water, sewer, and trash," and the current MLS data is fully consistent at 11/11 listings. This looks like a stable building-level fee inclusion rather than a one-off agent entry.
Water appears to be included in the HOA/association fees. A public remark explicitly lists "water" as included, and current MLS data is unanimous at 11/11 listings. The evidence is strong and consistent across multiple listings, suggesting a reliable building-level feature.
Strong evidence across listings: at least 7 of the 10 remarks explicitly reference BBQ (phrases include 'BBQ area', 'BBQ Amenities', and 'host casual weekend BBQs'). This is consistent with prior MLS data (9/10). Mentions appear across different agent remarks, suggesting a real common-area amenity rather than a single copy/paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Clubhouse is supported by the remarks, though not mentioned in most listings. At least 1 listing explicitly says the community has a "clubhouse," and another says the unit is a walk away from the "Club house, pool and BBQ Amenities." The evidence suggests a shared community amenity that may be copy/pasted in some remarks, but it is still directly confirmed.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Well-supported: about 5 of the 10 remarks explicitly mention walking/jogging paths (quotes include 'walking paths', 'walk/jog path', and 'walking/jogging paths'), consistent with prior MLS checkbox prevalence. Mentions come from multiple agents and listings, indicating a genuine building/community amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings (about 4 of 10) explicitly mention 'recreation area' or 'access to the community pool and recreation area.' These are direct mentions in agent remarks and align with MLS amenity checks, indicating a building-level recreation area amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
At least 3 listings mention storage-related features: phrases include “private upgraded patio/yard and storage,” “open covered lanai with additional storage space,” and “additional storage space.” MLS checkbox data also shows storage present in a subset of listings (1/10 amenities, 4/10 unit_features), suggesting some units in the building offer storage/lockers rather than a building-wide guaranteed locker system.
I searched for surfboard storage, board storage, surf storage, or related amenity wording. The remarks mention general storage in one unit, but nothing about dedicated surfboard storage facilities.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Pool is strongly supported across the listings and appears to be a shared building/community amenity. Multiple remarks from different listings explicitly mention the pool, including "the complex pool," "there is a pool," "access to the community pool," and "the pool is currently being renovated." This is consistent with the historical MLS data and does not look like a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit salt-water pool wording such as saltwater pool, salt pool, or saline pool. The remarks only mention a community pool and renovations, so there is no evidence that it is saltwater.
Evidence is very strong that Royal Palm at Waipio offers in-unit laundry. At least 8 listings explicitly mention washer/dryer or in-unit laundry, and the language is consistent across multiple remarks rather than a single agent's copy-paste. Current MLS inclusion data also aligns with the remarks, reinforcing high confidence.
No analysis available
I looked for terms such as coin laundry, coin-op, card operated, quarters, or laundry fees. The remarks only reference in-unit laundry and washer/dryer hookups, so there is no evidence of paid community laundry.
I searched for wording like "laundry on each floor," "every floor," or floor-by-floor community laundry, but the remarks only mention in-unit washer/dryer and washer/dryer hookups. There is no public remark evidence that the building has shared laundry facilities on each floor.
No analysis available
Assigned parking is strongly supported across the listings. Multiple remarks explicitly say "one assigned parking stall," "1 parking," and "2 STALLS," with one unit noting the stall is directly in front of the home. The repeated wording across several listings suggests this is a real building feature, not just a checkbox copy-paste.
Covered parking is very well supported across the listings. Several remarks explicitly state "covered parking stall" or "designated covered parking stall," and the historical MLS data also shows covered/garage parking in most listings. The consistency across multiple remarks makes this feature highly reliable.
I checked for wording like 'deeded parking,' 'owned stall,' or 'parking included in the deed.' The listings only describe assigned, covered, or conveniently located parking, which is not enough to पुष्टि that parking is deeded.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for any explicit parking charge, rental fee, or added monthly parking cost. None of the listings mention a parking fee, so this cannot be confirmed from the remarks.
Guest parking is available: at least a couple of current remarks explicitly mention 'guest parking' or 'nearby guest parking offers added flexibility', and this aligns with prior MLS data that frequently included guest parking. Evidence is consistent across listings though less pervasive than assigned/covered.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for 'parking waitlist,' 'waiting list,' or similar language about parking assignment. The remarks do not mention any waitlist process, so there is no evidence that one exists.
No analysis available
I looked for access-control language like key card entry, fob access, card reader, or electronic entry. The remarks mention security patrol and on-site/security presence, but not card-based access security.
Security is strongly supported for this building. Multiple recent listings mention it explicitly, including "security patrol throughout," "on-site security," "resident manager, and security," and "24 hr patrolling security." The MLS amenity is also consistent across all current listings, so this appears to be a real building feature rather than copy-paste noise.
This feature is directly supported by multiple public remarks. The listings explicitly mention security patrol service, including 24-hour patrolling security and security patrol throughout the community.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Window AC is strongly supported across the listings. At least 3 remarks explicitly mention it, including phrases like 'Window AC in living and main bedroom,' 'brand new window ACs,' and 'window A/C units in each bedroom.' This appears consistent across multiple agents and is not just a copied checkbox.
No analysis available
Double-wall construction appears to be a consistent building-level MLS attribute: 9 of 12 current listings list DOUWAL, and prior MLS history was also strong. None of the public remarks explicitly mention 'double wall' or similar wording, so this is supported primarily by the MLS construction field rather than agent remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
5 of 10 MLS records indicate a concrete slab foundation (SLAB). No public remarks explicitly mention 'concrete slab' or 'solid concrete foundation,' so the claim rests on MLS checkbox prevalence and should be treated as implied rather than explicitly documented.
No analysis available
Wood-frame construction appears to be supported by the MLS data: 7 of 11 current listings include WOOFRA, and earlier records showed 6 of 10 doing the same. None of the public remarks explicitly mention wood frame construction, so this is supported mainly by repeated MLS entries rather than agent commentary.
Only 2 of 9 MLS records currently indicate 'above ground' construction, yet none of the public remarks mention 'above ground construction' or equivalent. Given the absence of explicit remarks or user verification, the MLS checkbox entries appear unreliable and there is insufficient evidence that the building uses above-ground construction materials.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the public remarks for evidence that short-term rentals are allowed, including STR/NUC/TVU references and vacation-rental wording. Nothing in the listings indicates STR is permitted, so the safest reading is that STR is not shown as allowed.
I looked for hotel pool language such as hotel rental program, managed by hotel, or brand-specific pool participation. There is no such language in the remarks, and because STR is not supported here, hotel pool participation must be false.
I searched for phrases like mandatory hotel pool, required rental program, or cannot opt out. The remarks contain no indication of any rental pool arrangement, so mandatory participation is not supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for leasehold references such as 'lease expires [year],' 'ground lease ends,' 'renewed through,' or similar wording. The remarks do not mention any land lease or expiry date, so the lease expiry year cannot be determined from the provided text.
I searched the public remarks for explicit VA loan approval language and found none. Based on the available listings, there is no evidence that VA financing is approved for this building.
I looked for any HOA insurance references indicating full or walls-in coverage, but the remarks do not mention insurance coverage at all. Since this must come from public remarks, there is no evidence to mark the building as fully insured.
No analysis available
I searched the public remarks for explicit fire/life safety wording such as "FLSE passed," "life safety compliant," or "passed fire inspection" and found nothing. With no listing evidence to support a pass status, this is treated as not confirmed.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
At least 2 of the 10 current listings explicitly state garden views (e.g., "lanai overlooking lush garden views" and "lanai with beautiful garden views"). MLS view_descriptions list GARDEN for 1/10 and NONE for 4/10, but multiple public remarks across different listings confirm garden views for some units. Evidence is not unanimous across all agents (some listings say only "peaceful view" or none), but the explicit mentions indicate the building does offer garden-view units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No current listing remarks explicitly mention sunset views, and the MLS view field is overwhelmingly NONE or non-sunset descriptions. Across the provided remarks, agents consistently describe garden, peaceful, natural-light, or general neighborhood views, which does not support a sunset-view feature.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit references to viewing Friday night fireworks from the building, unit, or lanai. The remarks mention peaceful lanai, garden, and surrounding-area views, but nothing about fireworks views.
No analysis available
The evidence strongly supports a resident manager at the building. Current remarks explicitly mention 'resident manager' and 'Property Manager on Site,' and the MLS amenities show RESMAN in 11 of 12 listings. This appears consistent across multiple listings/agents, not just a one-off copy-paste entry.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.