Royal Garden at Waikiki

All available MLS property records (21/21) agree on 1977 as the construction year, and no remarks indicate a different build year or complete rebuild. This provides strong, consistent evidence that the building was built in 1977.

Multiple listings reference high-floor units and property data shows units as high as the 24th floor, with no evidence of higher stories. In the absence of 'top floor' or total-story remarks, we infer the building has 24 floors based on the highest observed unit floor.

Remarks describe Wyndham owning two thirds of the units but never state a total unit count. With no numeric references in any listing, the total number of units in the building cannot be reliably determined.

The public remarks explicitly note that two-thirds of the units are owned by Wyndham Vacations. This directly supports the current owner_occupancy value of 66.00%, so the numeric value is retained with high confidence.

I searched all remarks for explicit counts or mentions (e.g., '4 elevators', 'multiple elevators', 'elevator(s)') and found none. Because no numeric value is provided in the current data and no remarks specify elevators, the count is unknown and left as null.

Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.

Remarks consistently describe 'split AC' or 'split air conditioning' within individual units rather than a building-wide central AC system. With no MLS entries for central AC being included in fees, it is very likely that central AC is not a fee-included building utility.

Strong evidence: 18/20 MLS listings historically mark cable as included and the current aggregated remarks explicitly state 'HOA fee includes electricity, internet service, and cable TV' and 'issue a cable ... code upon reg.' Multiple agents independently mention cable/access codes, indicating consistent building-level inclusion rather than a single copy/paste error.

Moderately strong evidence: while historical coverage is about half the MLS entries (10/20), the current remarks repeatedly state 'HOA fee includes electricity' and agents describe building-managed services and amenities (pool, laundry) whose power is typically covered, supporting inclusion of common area electricity.

Listings repeatedly state 'Fee Simple' and never mention cooperative or co-op taxes. With no MLS indication of COOTAX, cooperative taxes are almost certainly not part of the maintenance fee.

Remarks from multiple agents clearly say electricity is included in the HOA fees. Together with the ELECTR checkbox in several MLS entries and the condo-hotel operating model, this strongly supports electricity being included in the maintenance fee.

Listings refer to kitchenettes and appliances without mentioning gas, and there is no MLS indication that gas is included in the fees. Given the building’s condotel setup and electric-style amenities, it is very unlikely that gas service is an HOA-included utility.

High confidence: 18/20 recent MLS entries marked hot water included and no current remarks or owner notes contradict that. Given the building's condotel/central systems, hot water being covered by HOA is consistent and supported by historical MLS data.

Strong evidence: 17/20 MLS listings historically show internet included and the current aggregated remarks explicitly mention 'internet service' and building-wide WiFi codes provided to guests, confirming internet is included in association fees.

Listings speak of Ala Wai Canal, ocean, and city views but never mention a marina, boat slips, or marina-related amenities. With no MLS indication of MARINA, there is no evidence that marina fees or access are included in the association fees.

Moderately strong evidence: 18/20 MLS entries historically mark sewer as included. Although the current aggregated remarks do not explicitly mention sewer, there is no contradictory evidence and the historical pattern for similar Waikiki condotels supports sewer being included in HOA fees.

Moderately strong evidence: 18/20 historic MLS listings indicate water included. Current remarks reference free on-site laundry and shared amenities (pool, landscaping) which align with HOA-covered water costs; no agent notes contradict inclusion, so water remains included.

Clear building amenity: BBQ is shown in MLS checkbox data for 18/20 listings and repeated in remarks ('BBQ area', 'barbecue area in a garden setting', 'BBQ Areas', 'Care for BBQ but hate the clean up? Security will set it up...'). Multiple agent remarks across listings confirm shared BBQ facilities.

0 of 20 listings reference bike storage, bicycle rooms, or bike racks, and the bike storage-related MLS amenity is never selected. The remarks focus on pool, gym, BBQ, valet, and laundry but are silent on any bicycle facilities, indicating the building does not offer dedicated bike storage.

Views of the canal and ocean are marketed, but there is no indication of dock access or mooring facilities. With MARINA absent in MLS and no textual evidence, the building does not appear to have a boat dock or marina.

Parking and valet services are described in detail, but there is no reference to any car wash facilities. With CRWSH unchecked across all MLS entries, the building likely does not offer a car wash amenity.

While there are lounges and common areas, no listing calls out a dedicated 'clubhouse' or 'community center'. With just a single MLS entry marking CLUHOU and no corroborating remarks, this appears to be an agent checkbox error rather than a real clubhouse.

Moderately strong evidence that the building offers concierge/front-desk services: several listings explicitly say "concierge service" or "on-site manager," and numerous remarks describe Wyndham staff handling guest services (registering guests, issuing codes/passes, assisting owners). While the CONCIE checkbox is present in fewer listings (5/20), the remarks consistently describe staffed front-desk functions across multiple agents, supporting inclusion of concierge service.

In a building where amenities are heavily marketed, a dog park or dog run would normally be highlighted but is never mentioned. The complete absence of DGPRK in MLS further supports that there is no dedicated dog park.

Marketing language focuses on security staff, valet, and concierge/front desk services rather than a dedicated doorman or lobby attendant. With just a single MLS listing indicating a doorman against this remark pattern, it is very likely the building does not offer a formal doorman service.

Strong evidence across listings: MLS data flags exercise_room in 19/20 listings and multiple remarks state 'fitness center', 'well-equipped gym', 'exercise room', and 'private large gym'. Mentions come from many different agent remarks (not limited to a single paste), indicating a building-level fitness facility accessible to owners/guests.

The building offers 'daily valet service' and '24-hour security' but no indication of limo or house-car service. The absence of LIMSER in MLS and in remarks supports that no limousine/car service amenity is provided.

Supported by MLS and remarks: 13/20 MLS entries include meeting_room and several public remarks explicitly cite 'private owners lounge', 'Wyndham's business and media lounge', and 'rec/game room' — indicating shared meeting/business/lounge spaces for owners and guests.

Multiple listings describe unit lanais and balconies, including a '30 sq. ft. “princess” balcony with canal views', 'view from your lanai', 'Tranquil and quiet view of Ala Wai Canal from lanai', and 'private lanai' with ocean and city views. Other remarks note 'spacious green yard' and outdoor BBQ/garden areas, showing that outdoor patio/deck-type spaces are a consistent amenity. Evidence is strong and repeated across many independent listings, not just a single agent’s description.

While the area offers many walkable attractions, there is no mention of an on-site jogging or walking path. The lack of WAJOPA in MLS supports that there is no dedicated jogging path amenity within the building complex.

Listings emphasize amenities for adults (pool, sauna, gym, rec room, BBQ, gardens) but say nothing about a children's playground. Combined with 0/20 MLS entries, this indicates there is no playground amenity.

Several listings describe resident-only outdoor garden areas, including 'very private green spaces and BBQ Areas', a 'spacious green yard', and a 'zen garden' in a garden setting. While these are shared rather than unit-exclusive yards, they function as private yard-like green spaces for owners and guests. Buyers looking for buildings with private garden/yard areas would likely consider this relevant.

A putting green is a notable luxury feature and would almost certainly be advertised if present, yet it is never mentioned. With PUTGRE absent from all MLS records, the building is very unlikely to have a putting green.

Several listings describe recreation facilities such as a 'recreation room', 'rec and game room', and 'game room', along with 'spacious green yard' and 'very private green spaces' around the pool/BBQ. Examples include 'amenities like a gym, swimming pool, and recreation room' and 'Included is the pool, rec and game room'. This supports a building-level recreation/amenity area.

Several descriptions mention a 'recreation room' or 'rec and game room', and one notes 'amenities include an exercise room, swimming pool, sauna, game room, BBQ, community laundry'. With RECROO checked in MLS, a shared indoor rec/game room clearly exists.

Agents repeatedly say the property is near or walking distance to many restaurants, but none indicate a restaurant or café inside the building itself. The single RESTAU check is likely a mistake, so an in-building restaurant is not considered present.

Agents repeatedly list pools, saunas, BBQ, gym, gardens, and lounges but never mention rooftop amenities or a roof deck. With ROOFDCK unchecked across all MLS entries, it is very likely there is no shared rooftop facility.

Well-supported amenity: sauna appears in MLS checkbox data for 15/20 listings and is mentioned repeatedly in public remarks ('POOL SAUNA.SHOWERS', 'heated pool, saunas', 'sauna'), reported by multiple agents across listings.

0 of 20 listings mention building storage units or lockers, and MLS amenities for storage are unchecked across all of them. Remarks only reference in-unit closet storage, with no indication of dedicated building storage rooms or lockers, so this appears to be a building without separate storage units.

The remarks reference many amenities (pool, sauna, BBQ, gym/fitness center, laundry, valet, business/media lounge, zen garden, recreation/game room) but do not mention any surfboard or board storage. Searched for terms like 'surfboard storage', 'board storage', 'surf storage', and similar phrases and found no references, so this feature is assumed not present based on available information.

Agents prominently market the building’s amenities but never mention a tennis court, which would normally be a key selling point. With 0/20 MLS entries indicating a tennis court, it is very likely this amenity is not present.

Mixed evidence: 15/20 MLS listings have the trash_chute checkbox checked (historically marked as present), but none of the supplied public remarks explicitly mention 'trash chute' or 'garbage chute'. Inclusion is based on consistent MLS checkbox usage (possible agent copy/paste) with moderate confidence.

Strong evidence that the building offers valet service: 11 of 20 MLS listings include VALET in amenities and many public remarks explicitly state phrases like 'Daily valet service $50/day for non-owners / $45/day for Owners', 'Parking by Valet in the building', and 'valet parking available for $50/day'. Mentions appear across multiple listings/agents rather than being limited to a single copy/paste, supporting a high-confidence inclusion.

Listings describe pools, green yards, zen gardens, and an urban Waikiki setting without any reference to being gated or fenced. Combined with 0/20 MLS indications for gated/walled amenities, this strongly suggests the property is not enclosed by a wall or fence as a security feature.

Listings that carefully list amenities never mention a hot tub or spa, even when detailing the pool and saunas. With just a single WHIRLP checkbox and no textual support, it is more likely there is no dedicated whirlpool/hot tub.

Strong, consistent evidence across listings supports that the building has a shared pool: 20 of 20 recent MLS listings list POOL in amenities and numerous agent remarks state phrases such as “swimming pool,” “community pool,” and “heated pool.” Mentions appear across multiple agents' remarks and are corroborated by the MLS checkbox data, indicating a reliable shared building amenity.

At least one remark clearly states the building has "a heated pool" among its outdoor amenities, indicating the shared pool is temperature-controlled. This is reinforced by 7 out of 20 MLS listings marking the heated-pool amenity and no evidence suggesting the pool is unheated, so the building is treated as offering a heated swimming pool.

All remarks were checked for any indication that the pool is salt water (terms like 'salt water pool', 'saltwater', 'saline', or 'salt pool') and none were found. The presence of a pool is clear, but its type is never specified, so it is assumed not to be a documented saltwater pool.

At least one listing clearly notes 'Washer and Dryer in the unit,' indicating that some units in Royal Garden at Waikiki offer in‑unit laundry. Although only 1/20 MLS listings check washer/dryer, this explicit remark provides strong evidence that buyers can find units with in‑unit laundry in this building.

Strong evidence that the building has shared laundry: historical MLS data indicates 19/20 listings have COMLAU, and numerous current remarks explicitly state 'community laundry', 'on-site laundry', 'free on-site laundry room', and 'FREE laundry with a card key in the private laundry facility.' The consistency across many listings and agents supports high confidence this is a building-level shared laundry amenity.

The laundry facilities are repeatedly described as free, sometimes accessed via a pass or card key, and never as coin- or fee-operated. I searched for terms such as coin-op, paid laundry, or card-operated machines and found none, so the community laundry is most likely not paid.

Multiple listings describe a central laundry facility on the 4th floor or a shared on-site/community laundry room, with no mention of laundry on every floor. I specifically looked for phrases like "laundry on each floor" or "laundry on every floor" and found none. This strongly suggests laundry is centralized rather than floor-by-floor.

Multiple listings note building parking such as “Parking by Valet in the building” and a “Parking garage [with] monthly and daily parking options for residents and visitors.” Despite most MLS checkboxes showing NONE, repeated references across many independently worded remarks confirm that the building provides on-site parking access via its garage and valet services.

Across all the provided remarks, parking is always described as valet or pay-per-use (e.g., “Daily valet service $50/day for non-owners/$45/day for owners”) rather than assigned or deeded stalls. With no MLS indication of ASSIGN and no textual evidence of reserved spaces, it is very likely the building does not offer assigned parking to unit owners.

One listing states “Parking garage has monthly and daily parking options for residents and visitors,” and others refer to valet parking within the building. A garage located in the building almost certainly provides covered parking, so buyers can expect covered/structured parking options here.

I searched remarks for terms indicating deeded/owned parking ('deeded parking', 'owned stall', 'parking included in deed') and found none. All parking references describe valet, daily/overnight charges, or monthly options, so parking_deeded is false with high confidence.

Agents repeatedly list amenities like pool, sauna, BBQ, gym, valet, and laundry but never mention EV charging or Tesla/EV stations. Given the breadth of marketing language and the complete absence of EV references in remarks and MLS checkboxes, it is very likely the building does not currently offer EV charging.

Searched for parking fee language. Found explicit daily/overnight valet rates multiple times and statements that monthly parking options exist, but no explicit monthly parking fee amount was provided in the public remarks.

Several listings describe parking as available via daily valet or garage options for non-owners and visitors (e.g., “Daily valet service $50/day for non-owners” and garage options for “residents and visitors”). This clearly indicates that guest/visitor parking is available in the building, primarily through the valet/garage system.

Listings note that security staff register guests and issue passes and that there is “24 hour security” alongside valet parking. While not explicitly stating a gate or card reader for the garage, the combination of staffed valet-only parking and continuous security strongly implies that parking access is secured and controlled.

None of the many remarks mention tandem, back-to-back, or shared stall configurations—only valet and general garage parking are described. With no MLS or textual evidence of tandem spaces, it is very likely the building does not offer tandem parking as a defined feature for owners.

At least 10 listings across different agents and wordings highlight valet parking (e.g., “Daily valet service,” “valet parking available for $50/day,” “Parking is also available over night in the building via valet service”). The consistency and detail of these references confirm that valet parking is a major, established feature of this building.

Looked for any reference to a parking waitlist/waiting list and found none. Absence of mention suggests no formal waitlist; set to false with low confidence due to lack of explicit statement.

Listings emphasize lobby quality, security staff, and other amenities but never mention secure or keyed elevators. Together with the complete absence of this amenity in the MLS checkboxes, this indicates the elevators are not keyed/fob-access controlled as a building feature.

I searched for terms like key card access, fob access, card reader, and keycard entry tied to building entry or security. The only card reference is for laundry usage, and keypad/keyless entry is described at the unit level, so there is no clear evidence of a building-wide security card/fob system.

Strong evidence across listings that the building provides security guard service: MLS checkbox currently set for 17/20 listings and many remarks explicitly state "secured building," "Security will register your guests," and "24 hour security." These mentions appear across multiple agent remarks and describe active security personnel performing guest registration and issuing passes, indicating a building-level staffed security presence.

I looked for phrases such as security patrol, roving security, and patrol service. While security staff and 24-hour security are noted, there is no explicit indication of an active patrol service in the building.

Across many listings, security is consistently described in terms of staffed 24‑hour security without any reference to cameras or video monitoring. Combined with 0/20 MLS checks for a security system amenity, this strongly suggests there is no distinct video-surveillance feature being offered or marketed.

No listing remarks describe central air or a building-wide HVAC system, despite detailed amenity descriptions being frequently copy-pasted. Only 1 of 20 MLS records checks a central AC-related field, suggesting that was likely an agent error rather than a true building-wide feature. The repeated emphasis on in-unit split AC upgrades instead of central systems supports treating central AC as absent at the building level.

Evidence is strong that some units have split (ductless) AC: 15/20 current MLS listings include ACSPL in inclusions and at least four separate public remarks explicitly state 'split air conditioning', 'split AC' or 'split A/C' (e.g., 'split air conditioning.', 'split AC', 'split A/C'). Mentions appear across multiple listings/agents and align with the MLS checkbox prevalence, so include the feature for buyers searching for split AC.

No listing remarks explicitly mention 'window A/C', 'window unit', or 'wall A/C', but 4 of 20 current listings have the ACWIUN (window A/C) inclusion checked, consistent with earlier medium-confidence data. Several upgraded units now advertise split A/C, suggesting A/C types vary by unit and that window units may be more common in older or less-remodeled condos. In the absence of explicit contradiction, this supports keeping window A/C as a possible feature available in at least some units, but with only moderate confidence.

All 20 of 20 current MLS listings for this building mark construction material as CONCRE (concrete), indicating consistent agent input across listings. Public remarks do not explicitly mention 'concrete' or 'reinforced concrete', but the unanimous MLS coding across many agents provides strong, corroborating evidence that the building is concrete-constructed.

Nearly half of the listings (9 of 20) tag double wall, and none explicitly deny it in remarks. Given the building’s vintage and typical construction practices, it is reasonable to include double-wall construction with moderate confidence.

No listings (0 of 20) report hollow tile construction and remarks provide no hints of it. The absence across all agents plus the typical concrete high-rise form makes hollow tile construction very unlikely.

Some listings (5 of 20) explicitly classify the building as masonry/stucco, while others simply leave the field unchecked. With no conflicting remarks and a building type that commonly uses stucco over masonry or concrete, this feature is included with moderate confidence.

A small minority of listings (3 of 20) check steel frame, but there is no supporting language in remarks and every listing confirms concrete construction. This pattern indicates the building is not properly described as steel-frame.

There is no MLS or remarks evidence that agents consider this a ‘slab’ construction in the MLS sense. Given 0 of 20 listings select SLAB and the building’s high-rise form, slab construction is treated as not applicable here.

No analysis available

Zero of 20 listings indicate wood frame construction and no remarks hint at any wood-frame structural elements. Given the high-rise concrete tower form, it is very unlikely this building is wood frame.

A small minority of listings check above-ground construction, but this conflicts with the expected foundation type for a concrete high-rise and is unsupported by remarks. The pattern points to data-entry noise rather than a true above-ground construction feature.

A few listings (3 of 20) flag brick construction, but listing remarks are completely silent about brick and the building type is inconsistent with brick structural construction. This strongly suggests the building is not constructed with brick.

There is zero MLS or remarks support for single-wall construction, and the building is a multi-story condotel where this method is not used. This strongly supports that single-wall construction is not a feature of this building.

Public remarks repeatedly and clearly state that short-term (daily) rentals are legal and permitted in the building, including multiple explicit phrases like 'legal daily short-term rental' and 'Short TERM LEGAL RENTAL.' High confidence true.

Searched for explicit mentions of a hotel rental pool or mandatory hotel-managed rental program. Although Wyndham/Club Wyndham is frequently mentioned, there is no explicit statement that the building participates in a hotel rental pool program, so set to false with low confidence.

Reviewed remarks for any language indicating mandatory participation in a hotel rental pool. Several listings explicitly state owners self-manage and that management doesn't charge extra fees for STRs, indicating participation is optional. Therefore mandatory pool is false with high confidence.

At least 4 of the ~20 listings explicitly state their tenure as 'Fee Simple' (e.g., 'Own 100% Fee Simple', 'Fee Simple Unit in a Legal Daily Short Term rental building'), and none mention leasehold. This confirms that the building offers Fee Simple units; there is no evidence of any non-FS tenure in the remarks or MLS land-tenure fields.

No listing remarks reference leasehold status, lease rent, or lease expiry, while multiple listings emphasize being 'Fee Simple'. Given the consistent absence of any leasehold indicators across all observed listings, it is highly likely the building does not offer leasehold units.

Multiple listings explicitly state the units are Fee Simple / 'Own 100% Fee Simple', so land lease/leasehold does not apply. Returned null for lease expiry year with high confidence.

Searched all public remarks for explicit VA loan language (e.g., 'VA approved', 'VA financing', 'VA loans accepted') and found none. No evidence in remarks to support VA approval, so set to false with medium confidence.

Several public remarks explicitly confirm comprehensive building-level hurricane insurance (e.g., '100% Hurricane insured' and 'full hurricane replacement cost coverage'), indicating walls-in / full building insurance by the HOA. Therefore insured_fully is set to true with high confidence.

Multiple MLS listings (12/20) check the fire-sprinkler amenity, and at least one set of public remarks explicitly states 'Fire sprinklers in place.' Historical data also showed majority MLS support plus an explicit sprinkler mention. Taken together, this provides strong, repeated evidence across time and agents that the building has a fire sprinkler system.

I searched for explicit phrasing indicating an FLSE or passed fire/life safety evaluation and found none. While the remarks note 'Fire sprinklers in place,' there is no wording confirming the building passed a formal fire/life safety evaluation, so this field is set to false with medium confidence due to absence of explicit confirmation.

Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.

No analysis available

Remarks note units with 'ocean, mountain, canal, and city views' and a 'lanai with partial ocean view,' confirming ocean exposure in the building. Current MLS data shows 8 of 20 listings checked for ocean views and none marked as having no view. This consistent evidence across several listings and agents strongly supports that the building offers ocean-view units.

Strong evidence that the building offers mountain views: 9 of 20 MLS view_descriptions list mountain historically, and current remarks across multiple listings explicitly mention 'mountain' or 'mountains' (quotes include 'ocean, mountain, canal, and city views' and 'mountains and city lights views'). Mentions come from several different listings/agents rather than a single copy-paste instance, supporting a high-confidence inclusion.

One high-floor unit specifically highlights 'Diamond Head' along with ocean, mountain, canal, and golf course views. MLS data shows 3 of 20 listings checked for Diamond Head view and none flagged with no view. This combination indicates that some units in the building enjoy Diamond Head vistas.

Multiple agent remarks emphasize 'stunning, city views,' 'ocean, mountain, canal, and city views,' and 'mountains and city lights views.' With 10 of 20 MLS listings tagged for city view and no listings marked as having no view, city views are clearly available in this building. This is a core part of how units are marketed.

Agents frequently describe ocean and canal views, and MLS view coding adds 3 of 20 listings with a specific coastline view designation. Given the building’s Waikiki location and high floors, this supports that some units see an extended shoreline, not just a water slice. Evidence is MLS-driven rather than remark-driven but still persuasive for inclusion.

The building literature mentions BBQ and pool in a 'garden setting,' a 'spacious green yard,' and 'very private green spaces' plus a 'ZEN GARDEN.' One MLS listing is tagged with a garden view, suggesting certain units face these landscaped common areas. While fewer listings highlight it, there is credible evidence that some units enjoy garden/courtyard-type views.

At least one high-floor unit is explicitly marketed as having 'golf course views' along with ocean, mountain, Diamond Head, and canal vistas. MLS data also shows a golf-course view box checked on 1 of 20 listings. This indicates that some units, likely on specific stacks/floors, look toward a golf course.

Clear evidence the building offers marina/canal views: 7 of 20 MLS view_descriptions list MARCAN historically, and multiple current remarks explicitly reference 'canal' or 'Ala Wai Canal' (quotes include 'princess balcony with canal views' and 'Tranquil and quiet view of Ala Wai Canal'), indicating consistent mention across listings and supporting high confidence.

No provided remarks explicitly mention sunrise, morning sun, or eastern exposure, so direct textual evidence is limited. However, 1/20 current MLS entries are coded for SUNRIS and prior data also had some sunrise coding, implying a subset of units face an easterly direction. Given this MLS pattern and the building’s demonstrated range of view orientations, it is likely that some units offer sunrise views even though agents rarely highlight it in remarks.

One listing prominently advertises 'spectacular sunset views' from the unit, providing clear textual evidence of sunset exposure. With 3/20 MLS entries coded for SUNSET and prior high-confidence data aligning, there is strong support that the building includes units with sunset views. Buyers seeking sunset-facing Waikiki units would reasonably consider this building.

Across all compiled listings, cemetery views are never mentioned, whereas many other view types are repeatedly highlighted. MLS data likewise shows zero listings coded with cemetery view. Given the urban Waikiki location and absence of any supporting evidence, it is highly likely that no units in this building have cemetery views.

Multiple units are described with various view types, yet none reference the Hilton Hawaiian Village Friday night fireworks or any fireworks viewing from the property. In the absence of explicit fireworks-view language, it is unlikely this feature is a notable selling point based on current remarks.

Listing remarks extensively market short-term rental, resort-style amenities, and building benefits but never reference being pet-friendly or allowing dogs/cats. Given the building’s hotel/condotel operation shared with Club Wyndham and typical policies in such properties, the evidence points to pets generally not being allowed. Buyers specifically needing a pet-friendly building should assume this property is not suitable.

Several listings mark RESMAN in the amenities, and at least one explicitly describes an 'on-site manager' as part of the building services. This corroborated description shows the building maintains a resident or on-site manager presence.

Many listings clearly state that units are in a condotel, emphasizing legal daily short-term rentals, hotel-quality finishes, and management shared with Club Wyndham. References to hotel operations, Wyndham amenities, and a resort-style lobby confirm condo-hotel use. Investors specifically searching for condotel properties will find this building fits that profile perfectly.

Remarks consistently refer to units as 'Fee Simple' and describe conventional condominium/condotel ownership rather than share-based cooperative ownership. There are no textual or MLS-code indicators of a co-op structure. Buyers requiring or avoiding co-op ownership can safely treat this as a non-cooperative, fee-simple condo/condotel building.