Royal Garden at Waikiki

All available MLS property records (21/21) agree on 1977 as the construction year, and no remarks indicate a different build year or complete rebuild. This provides strong, consistent evidence that the building was built in 1977.

Multiple listings reference high-floor units and property data shows units as high as the 24th floor, with no evidence of higher stories. In the absence of 'top floor' or total-story remarks, we infer the building has 24 floors based on the highest observed unit floor.

Remarks describe Wyndham owning two thirds of the units but never state a total unit count. With no numeric references in any listing, the total number of units in the building cannot be reliably determined.

Public remarks explicitly note that two-thirds of the building units are owned by Wyndham Vacations, directly supporting the current owner_occupancy value of 66%. Given the clear, repeated statement in multiple listings, this is recorded with high confidence.

I searched the remarks for terms like 'elevator', 'elevators', 'four elevators', 'multiple elevators', or numeric counts and found no explicit references. Because there is no current numeric value provided in the data and no remarks evidence, the number of elevators is unknown (null) and cannot be inferred.

Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.

Remarks consistently describe 'split AC' or 'split air conditioning' within individual units rather than a building-wide central AC system. With no MLS entries for central AC being included in fees, it is very likely that central AC is not a fee-included building utility.

Strong evidence across listings: 18 of 20 MLS listings historically include CABTV and several current public remarks explicitly state 'HOA fee includes ... cable TV' or 'tv (cable/wifi included).' Multiple agent remarks and building-wide mentions (e.g., 'they provide... cable/wifi included') indicate this is a building-level inclusion rather than an isolated unit note.

Moderately strong evidence: while historical coverage is about half the MLS entries (10/20), the current remarks repeatedly state 'HOA fee includes electricity' and agents describe building-managed services and amenities (pool, laundry) whose power is typically covered, supporting inclusion of common area electricity.

Listings repeatedly state 'Fee Simple' and never mention cooperative or co-op taxes. With no MLS indication of COOTAX, cooperative taxes are almost certainly not part of the maintenance fee.

Remarks from multiple agents clearly say electricity is included in the HOA fees. Together with the ELECTR checkbox in several MLS entries and the condo-hotel operating model, this strongly supports electricity being included in the maintenance fee.

Listings refer to kitchenettes and appliances without mentioning gas, and there is no MLS indication that gas is included in the fees. Given the building’s condotel setup and electric-style amenities, it is very unlikely that gas service is an HOA-included utility.

High confidence: 18/20 recent MLS entries marked hot water included and no current remarks or owner notes contradict that. Given the building's condotel/central systems, hot water being covered by HOA is consistent and supported by historical MLS data.

Strong evidence across listings: 17 of 20 MLS listings historically include INTSER and several current public remarks explicitly mention 'internet service' in HOA fees and that 'wifi is throughout the building.' Multiple agent remarks consistently reference internet being included, supporting a building-level inclusion.

Listings speak of Ala Wai Canal, ocean, and city views but never mention a marina, boat slips, or marina-related amenities. With no MLS indication of MARINA, there is no evidence that marina fees or access are included in the association fees.

Moderately strong but implied evidence: 18 of 20 MLS listings historically (and in current MLS aggregation) mark sewer as included in association fees, but the public remarks do not explicitly reference 'sewer included.' The inclusion is likely accurate based on consistent MLS checkbox data across multiple listings, though it is not called out in agent remarks.

Moderately strong but implied evidence: 18 of 20 MLS listings historically (and currently aggregated) indicate water is included in association fees, but none of the public remarks explicitly mention water being included. The repeated MLS checkbox presence across many listings suggests building-level inclusion, though it is not corroborated in the remarks.

Clear supporting evidence: many remark sections call out BBQ/barbecue areas (e.g., 'barbecue area in a garden setting', 'BBQ area'), and 18/20 current MLS listings have the BBQ checkbox checked. Multiple agents independently advertise the shared BBQ facilities, supporting inclusion.

0 of 20 listings reference bike storage, bicycle rooms, or bike racks, and the bike storage-related MLS amenity is never selected. The remarks focus on pool, gym, BBQ, valet, and laundry but are silent on any bicycle facilities, indicating the building does not offer dedicated bike storage.

Views of the canal and ocean are marketed, but there is no indication of dock access or mooring facilities. With MARINA absent in MLS and no textual evidence, the building does not appear to have a boat dock or marina.

Parking and valet services are described in detail, but there is no reference to any car wash facilities. With CRWSH unchecked across all MLS entries, the building likely does not offer a car wash amenity.

While there are lounges and common areas, no listing calls out a dedicated 'clubhouse' or 'community center'. With just a single MLS entry marking CLUHOU and no corroborating remarks, this appears to be an agent checkbox error rather than a real clubhouse.

Moderately strong evidence the building offers concierge/front-desk services: 6 of 20 listings have CONCIE checked and several remarks explicitly say 'concierge service' or 'on-site manager' with staffed operations (valet/front desk). Evidence is present in multiple agent remarks, though less ubiquitous than security, so confidence is slightly lower but still strong.

In a building where amenities are heavily marketed, a dog park or dog run would normally be highlighted but is never mentioned. The complete absence of DGPRK in MLS further supports that there is no dedicated dog park.

Marketing language focuses on security staff, valet, and concierge/front desk services rather than a dedicated doorman or lobby attendant. With just a single MLS listing indicating a doorman against this remark pattern, it is very likely the building does not offer a formal doorman service.

Strong, consistent evidence: 15+ separate remark blocks explicitly reference a gym/fitness center/exercise room (e.g., 'Work out in the gym', 'fitness center', 'exercise room'). MLS checkbox data is set in 19/20 current listings, and multiple agents independently describe the amenity, indicating the building offers a shared fitness facility.

The building offers 'daily valet service' and '24-hour security' but no indication of limo or house-car service. The absence of LIMSER in MLS and in remarks supports that no limousine/car service amenity is provided.

Supported by MLS and remarks: 13/20 MLS entries include meeting_room and several public remarks explicitly cite 'private owners lounge', 'Wyndham's business and media lounge', and 'rec/game room' — indicating shared meeting/business/lounge spaces for owners and guests.

Strong evidence the building offers patios/decks: multiple listings reference private lanais/balconies and outdoor spaces (e.g., 'Enjoy the view from your lanai', 'private lanai', '30 sq. ft. “princess” balcony with canal views') and numerous remarks describe outdoor amenities like BBQ areas and garden settings. This feature appears consistently across many agent remarks and aligns with prior MLS checkbox data (12 of 20).

While the area offers many walkable attractions, there is no mention of an on-site jogging or walking path. The lack of WAJOPA in MLS supports that there is no dedicated jogging path amenity within the building complex.

Listings emphasize amenities for adults (pool, sauna, gym, rec room, BBQ, gardens) but say nothing about a children's playground. Combined with 0/20 MLS entries, this indicates there is no playground amenity.

Several listings describe resident-only outdoor garden areas, including 'very private green spaces and BBQ Areas', a 'spacious green yard', and a 'zen garden' in a garden setting. While these are shared rather than unit-exclusive yards, they function as private yard-like green spaces for owners and guests. Buyers looking for buildings with private garden/yard areas would likely consider this relevant.

A putting green is a notable luxury feature and would almost certainly be advertised if present, yet it is never mentioned. With PUTGRE absent from all MLS records, the building is very unlikely to have a putting green.

Several listings describe recreation facilities such as a 'recreation room', 'rec and game room', and 'game room', along with 'spacious green yard' and 'very private green spaces' around the pool/BBQ. Examples include 'amenities like a gym, swimming pool, and recreation room' and 'Included is the pool, rec and game room'. This supports a building-level recreation/amenity area.

Several descriptions mention a 'recreation room' or 'rec and game room', and one notes 'amenities include an exercise room, swimming pool, sauna, game room, BBQ, community laundry'. With RECROO checked in MLS, a shared indoor rec/game room clearly exists.

Agents repeatedly say the property is near or walking distance to many restaurants, but none indicate a restaurant or café inside the building itself. The single RESTAU check is likely a mistake, so an in-building restaurant is not considered present.

Agents repeatedly list pools, saunas, BBQ, gym, gardens, and lounges but never mention rooftop amenities or a roof deck. With ROOFDCK unchecked across all MLS entries, it is very likely there is no shared rooftop facility.

Well-supported by listings: at least a dozen remark blocks mention 'sauna' or 'saunas' near the pool area (e.g., 'POOL SAUNA.SHOWERS', 'saunas and barbecue area in a garden setting'), and 16/20 MLS checkboxes indicate the amenity. Evidence is consistent across agents.

0 of 20 listings mention building storage units or lockers, and MLS amenities for storage are unchecked across all of them. Remarks only reference in-unit closet storage, with no indication of dedicated building storage rooms or lockers, so this appears to be a building without separate storage units.

The remarks reference many amenities (pool, sauna, BBQ, gym/fitness center, laundry, valet, business/media lounge, zen garden, recreation/game room) but do not mention any surfboard or board storage. Searched for terms like 'surfboard storage', 'board storage', 'surf storage', and similar phrases and found no references, so this feature is assumed not present based on available information.

Agents prominently market the building’s amenities but never mention a tennis court, which would normally be a key selling point. With 0/20 MLS entries indicating a tennis court, it is very likely this amenity is not present.

Implied by MLS data: 16 of 20 current listings have the trash chute checkbox checked, but none of the supplied public remarks reference a 'trash chute', 'garbage chute' or 'refuse chute'. Given the lack of explicit mentions and historical Medium confidence, presence is plausible but only moderately certain.

Clear, repeated mentions of valet in many listings: phrases include 'valet parking is available to all guests', '24 hour valet parking', and 'Daily valet service $50/day for non-owners / $45/day for Owners'. Evidence is consistent across multiple agent remarks and aligns with prior MLS amenity flags.

Listings describe pools, green yards, zen gardens, and an urban Waikiki setting without any reference to being gated or fenced. Combined with 0/20 MLS indications for gated/walled amenities, this strongly suggests the property is not enclosed by a wall or fence as a security feature.

Listings that carefully list amenities never mention a hot tub or spa, even when detailing the pool and saunas. With just a single WHIRLP checkbox and no textual support, it is more likely there is no dedicated whirlpool/hot tub.

Very strong evidence across MLS listings: 20 of 20 recent MLS listings list POOL in amenities and multiple public remarks state 'swimming pool', 'community pool', or 'pool & sauna'. Mentions appear consistently across many agents' remarks rather than a single isolated listing, supporting a high-confidence conclusion that the building has a shared pool.

Moderately strong evidence that the pool is heated: 8 of 20 MLS listings include HEAPOO and several public remarks explicitly say 'heated pool' (appearing in multiple listings' remarks). While 'heated' is not present in pool_features fields, the repeated amenity checkbox and explicit remarks across listings indicate a heated/shared pool with high confidence.

All remarks were checked for any indication that the pool is salt water (terms like 'salt water pool', 'saltwater', 'saline', or 'salt pool') and none were found. The presence of a pool is clear, but its type is never specified, so it is assumed not to be a documented saltwater pool.

At least one listing clearly notes 'Washer and Dryer in the unit,' indicating that some units in Royal Garden at Waikiki offer in‑unit laundry. Although only 1/20 MLS listings check washer/dryer, this explicit remark provides strong evidence that buyers can find units with in‑unit laundry in this building.

Strong, consistent evidence that the building has shared laundry: 19 of 20 current MLS listings include the COMLAU amenity and multiple public remarks explicitly state "community laundry", "on-site laundry", "free laundry", and "laundry room" (examples: "community laundry", "FREE laundry with a card key in the private laundry facility"). Mentions appear across many agent remarks and listings rather than a single isolated ad, supporting high confidence that the building offers shared laundry facilities.

The laundry facilities are repeatedly described as free, sometimes accessed via a pass or card key, and never as coin- or fee-operated. I searched for terms such as coin-op, paid laundry, or card-operated machines and found none, so the community laundry is most likely not paid.

Multiple listings describe a central laundry facility on the 4th floor or a shared on-site/community laundry room, with no mention of laundry on every floor. I specifically looked for phrases like "laundry on each floor" or "laundry on every floor" and found none. This strongly suggests laundry is centralized rather than floor-by-floor.

Multiple listing remarks reference on-site parking—frequent phrases include "valet parking is available", "Parking by Valet in the building", and "Parking garage has monthly and daily parking options for residents and visitors." At least ~10 of the provided remark segments explicitly mention valet or garage parking. Historical MLS data previously had high confidence for parking and current remarks from several agents consistently confirm it, though some checkbox fields are inconsistent (many listings show NONE), the remark-level evidence strongly indicates the building offers parking.

Across all the provided remarks, parking is always described as valet or pay-per-use (e.g., “Daily valet service $50/day for non-owners/$45/day for owners”) rather than assigned or deeded stalls. With no MLS indication of ASSIGN and no textual evidence of reserved spaces, it is very likely the building does not offer assigned parking to unit owners.

One listing states “Parking garage has monthly and daily parking options for residents and visitors,” and others refer to valet parking within the building. A garage located in the building almost certainly provides covered parking, so buyers can expect covered/structured parking options here.

I searched the remarks for terms like 'deeded parking', 'owned parking', or 'parking included in deed' and found none. Remarks only describe valet/paid parking and garage options, so deeded parking is set to false with moderate confidence.

Agents repeatedly list amenities like pool, sauna, BBQ, gym, valet, and laundry but never mention EV charging or Tesla/EV stations. Given the breadth of marketing language and the complete absence of EV references in remarks and MLS checkboxes, it is very likely the building does not currently offer EV charging.

Public remarks repeatedly list daily valet fees (examples: $50/day non-owners, $45/day owners, $40 overnight in some ads) and note there are monthly and daily parking options. No specific monthly parking fee amount was provided in the remarks.

Several listings describe parking as available via daily valet or garage options for non-owners and visitors (e.g., “Daily valet service $50/day for non-owners” and garage options for “residents and visitors”). This clearly indicates that guest/visitor parking is available in the building, primarily through the valet/garage system.

Listings note that security staff register guests and issue passes and that there is “24 hour security” alongside valet parking. While not explicitly stating a gate or card reader for the garage, the combination of staffed valet-only parking and continuous security strongly implies that parking access is secured and controlled.

None of the many remarks mention tandem, back-to-back, or shared stall configurations—only valet and general garage parking are described. With no MLS or textual evidence of tandem spaces, it is very likely the building does not offer tandem parking as a defined feature for owners.

At least 10 listings across different agents and wordings highlight valet parking (e.g., “Daily valet service,” “valet parking available for $50/day,” “Parking is also available over night in the building via valet service”). The consistency and detail of these references confirm that valet parking is a major, established feature of this building.

I searched for 'parking waitlist' and similar phrases and found no references. Absence of language about a waitlist suggests there is not a formal waitlist, so set to false with medium-low confidence.

Listings emphasize lobby quality, security staff, and other amenities but never mention secure or keyed elevators. Together with the complete absence of this amenity in the MLS checkboxes, this indicates the elevators are not keyed/fob-access controlled as a building feature.

I searched for terms like key card access, fob access, card reader, and keycard entry tied to building entry or security. The only card reference is for laundry usage, and keypad/keyless entry is described at the unit level, so there is no clear evidence of a building-wide security card/fob system.

Strong, consistent evidence that the building provides on-site security: 17 of 20 current listings have the SECGUA amenity checked and remarks repeatedly state '24 hour security', 'secured building', and that 'Security will register your guests.' Mentions appear across many agent remarks (not isolated to a single listing), supporting high confidence that security guard service exists.

I looked for phrases such as security patrol, roving security, and patrol service. While security staff and 24-hour security are noted, there is no explicit indication of an active patrol service in the building.

Across many listings, security is consistently described in terms of staffed 24‑hour security without any reference to cameras or video monitoring. Combined with 0/20 MLS checks for a security system amenity, this strongly suggests there is no distinct video-surveillance feature being offered or marketed.

No listing remarks describe central air or a building-wide HVAC system, despite detailed amenity descriptions being frequently copy-pasted. Only 1 of 20 MLS records checks a central AC-related field, suggesting that was likely an agent error rather than a true building-wide feature. The repeated emphasis on in-unit split AC upgrades instead of central systems supports treating central AC as absent at the building level.

Current MLS metadata lists ACSPL in 16 of 20 listings and at least five separate public remarks explicitly state 'split AC'/'split A/C' (examples: 'split air conditioning', 'split AC', 'split a/c and 2 twin beds'). Evidence is strong and appears across multiple agent remarks rather than isolated copy-paste, so the building should be listed as offering split (ductless/mini-split) AC in some units.

No listing remarks explicitly mention 'window A/C', 'window unit', or 'wall A/C', but 4 of 20 current listings have the ACWIUN (window A/C) inclusion checked, consistent with earlier medium-confidence data. Several upgraded units now advertise split A/C, suggesting A/C types vary by unit and that window units may be more common in older or less-remodeled condos. In the absence of explicit contradiction, this supports keeping window A/C as a possible feature available in at least some units, but with only moderate confidence.

All 20 of 20 current MLS listings for this building list construction material as 'CONCRE' (concrete), and historical confidence for this feature was High. Public remarks across the listings were reviewed and do not explicitly mention 'concrete' or 'reinforced concrete', but the unanimous MLS checkbox from multiple agents and prior high-confidence data provide strong evidence the building is concrete construction.

Nearly half of the listings (9 of 20) tag double wall, and none explicitly deny it in remarks. Given the building’s vintage and typical construction practices, it is reasonable to include double-wall construction with moderate confidence.

No listings (0 of 20) report hollow tile construction and remarks provide no hints of it. The absence across all agents plus the typical concrete high-rise form makes hollow tile construction very unlikely.

Some listings (5 of 20) explicitly classify the building as masonry/stucco, while others simply leave the field unchecked. With no conflicting remarks and a building type that commonly uses stucco over masonry or concrete, this feature is included with moderate confidence.

A small minority of listings (3 of 20) check steel frame, but there is no supporting language in remarks and every listing confirms concrete construction. This pattern indicates the building is not properly described as steel-frame.

There is no MLS or remarks evidence that agents consider this a ‘slab’ construction in the MLS sense. Given 0 of 20 listings select SLAB and the building’s high-rise form, slab construction is treated as not applicable here.

No analysis available

Zero of 20 listings indicate wood frame construction and no remarks hint at any wood-frame structural elements. Given the high-rise concrete tower form, it is very unlikely this building is wood frame.

A small minority of listings check above-ground construction, but this conflicts with the expected foundation type for a concrete high-rise and is unsupported by remarks. The pattern points to data-entry noise rather than a true above-ground construction feature.

A few listings (3 of 20) flag brick construction, but listing remarks are completely silent about brick and the building type is inconsistent with brick structural construction. This strongly suggests the building is not constructed with brick.

There is zero MLS or remarks support for single-wall construction, and the building is a multi-story condotel where this method is not used. This strongly supports that single-wall construction is not a feature of this building.

Public remarks repeatedly and clearly state that short-term (daily) rentals are legal and permitted in this building. Set to true with high confidence.

Short-term rentals are explicitly allowed in the building, and multiple remarks indicate close operational ties with Wyndham/Club Wyndham (Wyndham Vacations ownership, shared with Club Wyndham hotel, Wyndham staff support). Those statements amount to evidence the property participates in hotel-managed rental operations/pool rather than being purely independent.

Several listings explicitly note units are self-managed, management does not charge extra short-term rental fees, and owners operate independently. Therefore mandatory participation in a hotel rental pool is not indicated and is set to false with high confidence.

At least 4 of the ~20 listings explicitly state their tenure as 'Fee Simple' (e.g., 'Own 100% Fee Simple', 'Fee Simple Unit in a Legal Daily Short Term rental building'), and none mention leasehold. This confirms that the building offers Fee Simple units; there is no evidence of any non-FS tenure in the remarks or MLS land-tenure fields.

No listing remarks reference leasehold status, lease rent, or lease expiry, while multiple listings emphasize being 'Fee Simple'. Given the consistent absence of any leasehold indicators across all observed listings, it is highly likely the building does not offer leasehold units.

Listings repeatedly state 'Fee Simple' ownership (e.g., 'Own 100% Fee Simple', 'Fee Simple Unit'), so a lease expiry is not applicable. Returned null for lease expiry with high confidence.

I searched the remarks for phrases like 'VA approved', 'VA financing', or 'VA loans accepted' and found none. Because there is no explicit mention in any listing, the feature is set to false with low confidence.

The public remarks explicitly confirm comprehensive building-level hurricane insurance (e.g., '100% Hurricane insured' and 'Confirming that Royal Garden building has full hurricane replacement cost coverage'), supporting that the building is fully insured (walls-in style) with high confidence.

13 of 20 current MLS listings include the FIRSPR amenity and public remarks include an explicit statement: 'Fire sprinklers in place.' Multiple agents/ listings check the sprinkler checkbox and at least one listing's remarks directly confirm the feature, so evidence is strong and consistent across sources.

I searched for phrases such as 'fire life safety evaluation passed', 'FLSE passed', 'passed fire inspection', and 'fire safety certified' and found none in the public remarks. While the remarks note 'Fire sprinklers in place,' there is no explicit statement that the building passed a formal fire/life safety evaluation, so FLSE pass is marked false with medium-low confidence.

Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.

No analysis available

Multiple listings (5/20 current MLS entries) and many agent remarks reference ocean exposure — e.g., 'beautiful ocean... views', 'partial ocean view', and 'sweeping views'. Evidence is consistent across several listings/agents and aligns with historical high confidence that the building offers ocean-view units.

Mountain views are cited in multiple listings (8/20 current MLS entries) and agent remarks frequently mention 'mountains', 'Diamond Head', and 'mauka' type views. The consistent, repeated language across listings provides strong evidence the building offers mountain-view units.

One high-floor unit specifically highlights 'Diamond Head' along with ocean, mountain, canal, and golf course views. MLS data shows 3 of 20 listings checked for Diamond Head view and none flagged with no view. This combination indicates that some units in the building enjoy Diamond Head vistas.

City views appear in several listings (7/20 current MLS entries) with remarks such as 'stunning, city views' and 'city lights views.' Multiple agents reference city vistas, supporting that the building offers units with city views.

Agents frequently describe ocean and canal views, and MLS view coding adds 3 of 20 listings with a specific coastline view designation. Given the building’s Waikiki location and high floors, this supports that some units see an extended shoreline, not just a water slice. Evidence is MLS-driven rather than remark-driven but still persuasive for inclusion.

Although only 1/20 current MLS entries list GARDEN, many public remarks reference 'garden setting', 'zen garden', 'lush greenery', and 'very private green spaces', indicating the building has landscaped/common garden areas. Evidence is moderate and appears across several agent remarks rather than solely checkbox data.

At least one high-floor unit is explicitly marketed as having 'golf course views' along with ocean, mountain, Diamond Head, and canal vistas. MLS data also shows a golf-course view box checked on 1 of 20 listings. This indicates that some units, likely on specific stacks/floors, look toward a golf course.

Canal/marina-type views are documented in multiple listings (7/20 current MLS entries) and agent remarks repeatedly mention 'Ala Wai Canal' and 'canal views' from lanais. This consistent evidence across listings indicates the building offers marina/canal views.

No provided remarks explicitly mention sunrise, morning sun, or eastern exposure, so direct textual evidence is limited. However, 1/20 current MLS entries are coded for SUNRIS and prior data also had some sunrise coding, implying a subset of units face an easterly direction. Given this MLS pattern and the building’s demonstrated range of view orientations, it is likely that some units offer sunrise views even though agents rarely highlight it in remarks.

Sunset views are called out in several listings (3/20 current MLS entries) and agent remarks include phrases like 'spectacular sunset views' and 'sunny' orientation references. Multiple listings corroborate sunset exposure, providing strong evidence the building offers units with sunset/western views.

Across all compiled listings, cemetery views are never mentioned, whereas many other view types are repeatedly highlighted. MLS data likewise shows zero listings coded with cemetery view. Given the urban Waikiki location and absence of any supporting evidence, it is highly likely that no units in this building have cemetery views.

Multiple units are described with various view types, yet none reference the Hilton Hawaiian Village Friday night fireworks or any fireworks viewing from the property. In the absence of explicit fireworks-view language, it is unlikely this feature is a notable selling point based on current remarks.

Listing remarks extensively market short-term rental, resort-style amenities, and building benefits but never reference being pet-friendly or allowing dogs/cats. Given the building’s hotel/condotel operation shared with Club Wyndham and typical policies in such properties, the evidence points to pets generally not being allowed. Buyers specifically needing a pet-friendly building should assume this property is not suitable.

Several listings mark RESMAN in the amenities, and at least one explicitly describes an 'on-site manager' as part of the building services. This corroborated description shows the building maintains a resident or on-site manager presence.

Many listings clearly state that units are in a condotel, emphasizing legal daily short-term rentals, hotel-quality finishes, and management shared with Club Wyndham. References to hotel operations, Wyndham amenities, and a resort-style lobby confirm condo-hotel use. Investors specifically searching for condotel properties will find this building fits that profile perfectly.

Remarks consistently refer to units as 'Fee Simple' and describe conventional condominium/condotel ownership rather than share-based cooperative ownership. There are no textual or MLS-code indicators of a co-op structure. Buyers requiring or avoiding co-op ownership can safely treat this as a non-cooperative, fee-simple condo/condotel building.