Royal Garden at Waikiki

All available MLS property records (21/21) agree on 1977 as the construction year, and no remarks indicate a different build year or complete rebuild. This provides strong, consistent evidence that the building was built in 1977.

The MLS floor field and unit-number-derived floors agree through a highest value of 24, and the state registration also reports 24 floors. The county's 22-floor figure is set aside because assessor floor counts can differ from the top residential floor.

The county assessor's reconciled condominium units and the state registration both report 212 units for this single-building record. The stored value is supported by these independent sources.

Owner occupancy from AOUO registration(s) 4584. Refreshed by Real_Estate_Scraper/reb_registry/propagate_owner_occupancy.py, which this lock does not block.

The remarks were searched for explicit elevator information such as “4 elevators,” “four elevators,” or “multiple elevators,” but none was found. Because no current elevator count is provided and the remarks do not establish a number, the value remains unknown.

Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.

Remarks consistently describe 'split AC' or 'split air conditioning' within individual units rather than a building-wide central AC system. With no MLS entries for central AC being included in fees, it is very likely that central AC is not a fee-included building utility.

Cable inclusion is strongly supported by 18 of 20 MLS listings containing CABTV. Multiple remarks confirm this directly with phrases such as "Maintenance fees include cable TV" and "HOA fee includes ... cable TV," although some wording appears reused across listings.

Common-area electricity is supported by the current MLS code OTCOEX in 11 of 20 listings. Several remarks say "Maintenance fees include electricity" or "HOA fees include electricity," providing corroboration, though the remarks generally do not explicitly say common-area electricity.

Listings repeatedly state 'Fee Simple' and never mention cooperative or co-op taxes. With no MLS indication of COOTAX, cooperative taxes are almost certainly not part of the maintenance fee.

Remarks from multiple agents clearly say electricity is included in the HOA fees. Together with the ELECTR checkbox in several MLS entries and the condo-hotel operating model, this strongly supports electricity being included in the maintenance fee.

Listings refer to kitchenettes and appliances without mentioning gas, and there is no MLS indication that gas is included in the fees. Given the building’s condotel setup and electric-style amenities, it is very unlikely that gas service is an HOA-included utility.

Hot water inclusion is strongly supported by MLS history: HOTWAT appears in 17 of 20 listings and WTRHTR appears in none. One remark directly states, "Maintenance fees include ... hot water," confirming the building-level feature.

Internet inclusion is very strongly supported, with INTSER appearing in 18 of 20 listings. Remarks repeatedly state "Maintenance fees include ... internet" or "HOA fees include internet service," and another listing notes cable/Wi-Fi is included.

Listings speak of Ala Wai Canal, ocean, and city views but never mention a marina, boat slips, or marina-related amenities. With no MLS indication of MARINA, there is no evidence that marina fees or access are included in the association fees.

Sewer inclusion is strongly supported by the MLS, appearing in 18 of 20 listings. Repeated remarks state, "Maintenance fees include cable TV, internet, water, sewer, and hot water," confirming the feature across the building.

Water inclusion is clearly supported, with WATER present in 18 of 20 listings. Multiple remarks directly confirm it through the phrase "Maintenance fees include cable TV, internet, water, sewer, and hot water," indicating strong building-level evidence.

At least 15 listings mention BBQ or barbecue facilities, including "outdoor BBQ area," "BBQ areas," and "barbecue area." The broad repetition across listings and 18/20 current MLS entries strongly confirms this as a building amenity.

0 of 20 listings reference bike storage, bicycle rooms, or bike racks, and the bike storage-related MLS amenity is never selected. The remarks focus on pool, gym, BBQ, valet, and laundry but are silent on any bicycle facilities, indicating the building does not offer dedicated bike storage.

Views of the canal and ocean are marketed, but there is no indication of dock access or mooring facilities. With MARINA absent in MLS and no textual evidence, the building does not appear to have a boat dock or marina.

Parking and valet services are described in detail, but there is no reference to any car wash facilities. With CRWSH unchecked across all MLS entries, the building likely does not offer a car wash amenity.

While there are lounges and common areas, no listing calls out a dedicated 'clubhouse' or 'community center'. With just a single MLS entry marking CLUHOU and no corroborating remarks, this appears to be an agent checkbox error rather than a real clubhouse.

At least 4 listings explicitly mention concierge service, including "concierge service," "24 HOUR SECURITY and CONCIERGE," and "on-site manager, concierge service." The wording is repeated in some likely templated listings, but it is consistent with the 7/20 current MLS concierge amenity records and is sufficient to confirm the feature.

In a building where amenities are heavily marketed, a dog park or dog run would normally be highlighted but is never mentioned. The complete absence of DGPRK in MLS further supports that there is no dedicated dog park.

Marketing language focuses on security staff, valet, and concierge/front desk services rather than a dedicated doorman or lobby attendant. With just a single MLS listing indicating a doorman against this remark pattern, it is very likely the building does not offer a formal doorman service.

At least 17 listings mention the feature using phrases such as "fitness center," "exercise room," "fitness room," "work out gym," or "private large gym." The repeated descriptions across many listings and the 19/20 MLS checkbox pattern provide very strong building-level confirmation.

The building offers 'daily valet service' and '24-hour security' but no indication of limo or house-car service. The absence of LIMSER in MLS and in remarks supports that no limousine/car service amenity is provided.

Meeting-room-type space is implied more than directly named. The public remarks repeatedly mention a 'business/media lounge,' 'owners lounge,' and 'tech room,' and the current MLS data has a strong majority checked. This looks like a shared community/lounge space that likely functions as a meeting area.

At least 13 of 20 listings have patio/deck-related MLS amenities, and numerous independent remarks explicitly mention lanais or balconies. The repeated lanai references across many listings strongly confirm that the building offers patio/deck-type outdoor spaces, although some wording appears reused.

There is no meaningful remark evidence for an on-site jogging or walking path. Listings repeatedly describe pool, sauna, BBQ, gym, recreation room, and garden/common areas, but never a jogging/walking path, and the MLS checkbox appears on only 1/20 records. That pattern strongly suggests the path feature is not actually part of the building amenity package.

Listings emphasize amenities for adults (pool, sauna, gym, rec room, BBQ, gardens) but say nothing about a children's playground. Combined with 0/20 MLS entries, this indicates there is no playground amenity.

Several listings mention private or secluded outdoor areas, including "very private green spaces," "spacious green yard," and a private-owner "zen garden." The evidence is less uniform than for patios or valet and some descriptions are duplicated, but the current MLS PRIYAR entries and repeated remarks support including the feature.

A putting green is a notable luxury feature and would almost certainly be advertised if present, yet it is never mentioned. With PUTGRE absent from all MLS records, the building is very unlikely to have a putting green.

Recreation facilities are supported by 10/20 current MLS listings and repeated remarks describing a "large grassy recreation area," "recreation room," "rec and game room," and "recreation/game room." Although less consistently checked than the other amenities, the explicit descriptions from multiple listings confirm that the building offers shared recreation space.

Recreation room is supported by several public remarks, including 'game room,' 'rec and game room,' and direct 'recreation room' wording. The evidence is less universal than the gym/sauna, but it is repeated enough across multiple listings to treat as a true building amenity.

Agents repeatedly say the property is near or walking distance to many restaurants, but none indicate a restaurant or café inside the building itself. The single RESTAU check is likely a mistake, so an in-building restaurant is not considered present.

Agents repeatedly list pools, saunas, BBQ, gym, gardens, and lounges but never mention rooftop amenities or a roof deck. With ROOFDCK unchecked across all MLS entries, it is very likely there is no shared rooftop facility.

At least 15 listings mention the feature with phrases such as "sauna," "saunas," and "pool sauna." This consistent remark evidence from multiple listings, combined with the 19/20 MLS pattern and previously high confidence, confirms the amenity.

None of the 20 listings mention dedicated building storage units or lockers. One listing references a floor-to-ceiling closet for 'exceptional storage,' but this is ordinary in-unit closet storage rather than a separate storage facility, so the feature remains unsupported.

The remarks reference many amenities (pool, sauna, BBQ, gym/fitness center, laundry, valet, business/media lounge, zen garden, recreation/game room) but do not mention any surfboard or board storage. Searched for terms like 'surfboard storage', 'board storage', 'surf storage', and similar phrases and found no references, so this feature is assumed not present based on available information.

Agents prominently market the building’s amenities but never mention a tennis court, which would normally be a key selling point. With 0/20 MLS entries indicating a tennis court, it is very likely this amenity is not present.

No supplied public remarks explicitly mention a "trash chute," "garbage chute," or "refuse chute." However, 15 of 20 current listings identify TRACHU, which moderately supports including it; the absence of remark confirmation prevents high confidence.

Valet is strongly supported across numerous independent listing remarks, not merely checkbox data. Multiple listings explicitly describe valet parking or valet service, including specific daily prices of $40, $45, and $50, while the current MLS data shows valet in 14 of 20 listings.

Listings describe pools, green yards, zen gardens, and an urban Waikiki setting without any reference to being gated or fenced. Combined with 0/20 MLS indications for gated/walled amenities, this strongly suggests the property is not enclosed by a wall or fence as a security feature.

Listings that carefully list amenities never mention a hot tub or spa, even when detailing the pool and saunas. With just a single WHIRLP checkbox and no textual support, it is more likely there is no dedicated whirlpool/hot tub.

The pool is strongly confirmed across all 20 MLS listings and many independent remarks. Listings describe the building's shared resort-style pool with phrases such as 'swimming pool,' 'outdoor pool,' 'heated pool,' and 'large pool,' along with related amenities including saunas, BBQ areas, and fitness facilities.

Heating is supported by 9 of 20 current MLS amenity records and several explicit remarks from separate listing descriptions. Key phrases include "There is a heated pool" and "outdoor amenities including a heated pool," making heated status stronger than checkbox data alone.

All remarks were checked for any indication that the pool is salt water (terms like 'salt water pool', 'saltwater', 'saline', or 'salt pool') and none were found. The presence of a pool is clear, but its type is never specified, so it is assumed not to be a documented saltwater pool.

At least one listing clearly notes 'Washer and Dryer in the unit,' indicating that some units in Royal Garden at Waikiki offer in‑unit laundry. Although only 1/20 MLS listings check washer/dryer, this explicit remark provides strong evidence that buyers can find units with in‑unit laundry in this building.

At least 17 of 25 provided listings mention community laundry or an equivalent shared facility, including "free community laundry," "community laundry," and "on-site laundry facilities." The feature is also overwhelmingly supported by current MLS data (19/20 listings), with consistent confirmation across multiple listings and agents.

The laundry facilities are repeatedly described as free, sometimes accessed via a pass or card key, and never as coin- or fee-operated. I searched for terms such as coin-op, paid laundry, or card-operated machines and found none, so the community laundry is most likely not paid.

Multiple listings describe a central laundry facility on the 4th floor or a shared on-site/community laundry room, with no mention of laundry on every floor. I specifically looked for phrases like "laundry on each floor" or "laundry on every floor" and found none. This strongly suggests laundry is centralized rather than floor-by-floor.

Parking is strongly supported across many listings and is explicitly described in multiple ways. At least 10+ remarks mention valet parking, parking garage access, or monthly/daily parking options, which outweighs the recent MLS checkbox inconsistency showing many 'NONE' entries. The evidence appears to be consistent across different agents rather than a single copy-paste error.

Across all the provided remarks, parking is always described as valet or pay-per-use (e.g., “Daily valet service $50/day for non-owners/$45/day for owners”) rather than assigned or deeded stalls. With no MLS indication of ASSIGN and no textual evidence of reserved spaces, it is very likely the building does not offer assigned parking to unit owners.

At least two listings explicitly mention a "parking garage," including one stating it offers monthly and daily parking and another describing garage parking for residents and visitors. Numerous additional listings mention valet parking, so the evidence is consistent across multiple agents and confirms covered/structured parking at the building.

The remarks describe valet parking, street parking, and separately available monthly or daily garage parking. They do not state that a parking stall is deeded or owned with the unit.

Agents repeatedly list amenities like pool, sauna, BBQ, gym, valet, and laundry but never mention EV charging or Tesla/EV stations. Given the breadth of marketing language and the complete absence of EV references in remarks and MLS checkboxes, it is very likely the building does not currently offer EV charging.

Paid parking is explicitly mentioned, including valet charges such as "$50/day for non owners," "$45/day for owners," and "$40" overnight valet service. Monthly parking options are mentioned, but no monthly dollar amount is stated.

Several listings explicitly confirm guest or visitor parking, including "parking garage offers both monthly & daily parking options for residents and guests" and "parking ... for residents and visitors." Other listings state that valet service is available to all guests or non-owners, providing strong multi-agent confirmation rather than a single copied checkbox.

Listings note that security staff register guests and issue passes and that there is “24 hour security” alongside valet parking. While not explicitly stating a gate or card reader for the garage, the combination of staffed valet-only parking and continuous security strongly implies that parking access is secured and controlled.

None of the many remarks mention tandem, back-to-back, or shared stall configurations—only valet and general garage parking are described. With no MLS or textual evidence of tandem spaces, it is very likely the building does not offer tandem parking as a defined feature for owners.

At least 10 listings across different agents and wordings highlight valet parking (e.g., “Daily valet service,” “valet parking available for $50/day,” “Parking is also available over night in the building via valet service”). The consistency and detail of these references confirm that valet parking is a major, established feature of this building.

The listings mention valet, street, daily, overnight, and monthly parking options. No parking waitlist system is described, so there is insufficient evidence that the building maintains one.

Listings emphasize lobby quality, security staff, and other amenities but never mention secure or keyed elevators. Together with the complete absence of this amenity in the MLS checkboxes, this indicates the elevators are not keyed/fob-access controlled as a building feature.

I searched for terms like key card access, fob access, card reader, and keycard entry tied to building entry or security. The only card reference is for laundry usage, and keypad/keyless entry is described at the unit level, so there is no clear evidence of a building-wide security card/fob system.

At least 8 listings explicitly mention building security, including "24-hour security" in several remarks and "secured building" or "security will register your guests" in others. Although some amenity descriptions appear copied between listings, the feature is strongly supported across numerous listings and aligns with the 17/20 MLS amenity records.

I looked for phrases such as security patrol, roving security, and patrol service. While security staff and 24-hour security are noted, there is no explicit indication of an active patrol service in the building.

Across many listings, security is consistently described in terms of staffed 24‑hour security without any reference to cameras or video monitoring. Combined with 0/20 MLS checks for a security system amenity, this strongly suggests there is no distinct video-surveillance feature being offered or marketed.

No listing remarks describe central air or a building-wide HVAC system, despite detailed amenity descriptions being frequently copy-pasted. Only 1 of 20 MLS records checks a central AC-related field, suggesting that was likely an agent error rather than a true building-wide feature. The repeated emphasis on in-unit split AC upgrades instead of central systems supports treating central AC as absent at the building level.

At least 6 current listing remarks explicitly mention split AC or equivalent wording, including "split air conditioning," "split AC," and "split A/C." The evidence is supported across multiple listings and aligns with the strong MLS checkbox pattern of 15/20 listings, confirming that split AC is available in units at Royal Garden at Waikiki.

Five of 20 current listings include the ACWIUN/window A/C checkbox, supporting limited building-level availability. No listings explicitly mention window AC or related phrases, while several describe “split air conditioning” or “split AC,” so the evidence is moderate and the checkbox data may include some agent copy/paste inaccuracies.

All 20 listings report CONCRE in the construction materials field, providing strong, consistent building-level evidence. Although the public remarks do not explicitly say "concrete construction," the uniform MLS pattern across listings strongly supports this feature.

Seven of 20 listings mark DOUWAL in the MLS construction materials field, but none of the supplied remarks explicitly mention double-wall construction. The evidence is therefore limited and may reflect inconsistent or copied checkbox data, though it provides some support for the feature.

No listings (0 of 20) report hollow tile construction and remarks provide no hints of it. The absence across all agents plus the typical concrete high-rise form makes hollow tile construction very unlikely.

Some listings (5 of 20) explicitly classify the building as masonry/stucco, while others simply leave the field unchecked. With no conflicting remarks and a building type that commonly uses stucco over masonry or concrete, this feature is included with moderate confidence.

A small minority of listings (3 of 20) check steel frame, but there is no supporting language in remarks and every listing confirms concrete construction. This pattern indicates the building is not properly described as steel-frame.

There is no MLS or remarks evidence that agents consider this a ‘slab’ construction in the MLS sense. Given 0 of 20 listings select SLAB and the building’s high-rise form, slab construction is treated as not applicable here.

No analysis available

Zero of 20 listings indicate wood frame construction and no remarks hint at any wood-frame structural elements. Given the high-rise concrete tower form, it is very unlikely this building is wood frame.

No listing explicitly mentions above-ground construction or above-ground materials. Only 3 of 20 current listings contain the ABOGRO checkbox, while the prior high-confidence assessment found the feature unsupported; the sparse checkbox pattern appears more likely to reflect inconsistent or copied MLS data.

A few listings (3 of 20) flag brick construction, but listing remarks are completely silent about brick and the building type is inconsistent with brick structural construction. This strongly suggests the building is not constructed with brick.

There is zero MLS or remarks support for single-wall construction, and the building is a multi-story condotel where this method is not used. This strongly supports that single-wall construction is not a feature of this building.

Short-term rentals are repeatedly and explicitly confirmed as legal and permitted in the building. Several listings also describe active Airbnb operations and daily rental use.

The remarks consistently characterize Royal Garden as a boutique condotel associated with Wyndham and shared with hotel operations. This supports participation in a hotel-related rental operation, while the listings do not identify a separate formal pool name.

Hotel or Wyndham affiliation does not require every owner to participate in a rental pool according to the remarks. Flexible owner use, private enjoyment, and self-management explicitly indicate that participation is not mandatory.

At least 4 of the ~20 listings explicitly state their tenure as 'Fee Simple' (e.g., 'Own 100% Fee Simple', 'Fee Simple Unit in a Legal Daily Short Term rental building'), and none mention leasehold. This confirms that the building offers Fee Simple units; there is no evidence of any non-FS tenure in the remarks or MLS land-tenure fields.

No listing remarks reference leasehold status, lease rent, or lease expiry, while multiple listings emphasize being 'Fee Simple'. Given the consistent absence of any leasehold indicators across all observed listings, it is highly likely the building does not offer leasehold units.

The property is repeatedly identified as fee simple rather than leasehold. Searches for lease expiration, ground lease, leasehold renewal, and a specific expiry year found no applicable date.

The public remarks were searched for explicit VA loan approval or VA financing language, but none was found. The listings discuss legal short-term rentals and investment potential, not VA eligibility, so there is insufficient evidence that the building is VA approved.

Multiple listings explicitly describe the building as 100% hurricane insured and confirm full hurricane replacement-cost coverage. These repeated statements strongly support that the building is fully insured.

Fire sprinklers are supported by 14 of 20 current MLS listings, indicating the amenity is consistently associated with the building. One listing explicitly states, "Fire sprinklers in place," providing direct confirmation beyond checkbox data; the evidence is strong and consistent with the previously high-confidence assessment.

The remarks reference fire sprinklers, which is related to life-safety features, but this does not confirm a passed fire/life safety evaluation. No explicit statement such as “FLSE passed,” “fire safety certified,” or “life safety compliant” was found.

Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.

No analysis available

Ocean views are strongly supported across the building: 12 of 20 current listings mention OCEAN, including phrases such as "ocean, mountain, Ala Wai Canal & city views," "peak a boo ocean," and "partial ocean view." Multiple listings from different marketing descriptions confirm that at least some units offer ocean views.

Mountain views are strongly supported across the building, appearing in 18 of 20 current MLS records. Multiple remarks from different listings explicitly cite mountain or mountains views, including high-floor and corner-unit descriptions, so this is unlikely to be merely unchecked or copied checkbox data.

One high-floor unit specifically highlights 'Diamond Head' along with ocean, mountain, canal, and golf course views. MLS data shows 3 of 20 listings checked for Diamond Head view and none flagged with no view. This combination indicates that some units in the building enjoy Diamond Head vistas.

City views are well established, appearing in 16 of 20 current MLS records. Several remarks independently reference city, cityscape, or city-lights views, often alongside mountain, canal, or ocean views, confirming that the building offers units with city views.

Agents frequently describe ocean and canal views, and MLS view coding adds 3 of 20 listings with a specific coastline view designation. Given the building’s Waikiki location and high floors, this supports that some units see an extended shoreline, not just a water slice. Evidence is MLS-driven rather than remark-driven but still persuasive for inclusion.

Although only 1/20 current MLS entries list GARDEN, many public remarks reference 'garden setting', 'zen garden', 'lush greenery', and 'very private green spaces', indicating the building has landscaped/common garden areas. Evidence is moderate and appears across several agent remarks rather than solely checkbox data.

Golf-course views are less common but clearly available, with 3 of 20 current MLS listings mentioning GOLCOU. Explicit remarks include "golf course from this roomy wrap around lanai" and "beautiful ocean, mountain, Diamond Head, Ala Wai canal, and golf course views," confirming this is a legitimate building-level offering for some units.

Marina/canal views are among the strongest documented features, appearing in 18 of 20 current MLS records. Multiple listings specifically mention Ala Wai Canal views from private lanais, demonstrating that buyers can find units with canal or harbor-type views in the building.

No provided remarks explicitly mention sunrise, morning sun, or eastern exposure, so direct textual evidence is limited. However, 1/20 current MLS entries are coded for SUNRIS and prior data also had some sunrise coding, implying a subset of units face an easterly direction. Given this MLS pattern and the building’s demonstrated range of view orientations, it is likely that some units offer sunrise views even though agents rarely highlight it in remarks.

Sunset views are supported by 14 of 20 current MLS records and are explicitly mentioned in multiple remarks. The repeated phrase "sunset views" in high-floor unit descriptions provides clear evidence that the building offers units with sunset views, although this feature is somewhat less common than mountain, city, or canal views.

Across all compiled listings, cemetery views are never mentioned, whereas many other view types are repeatedly highlighted. MLS data likewise shows zero listings coded with cemetery view. Given the urban Waikiki location and absence of any supporting evidence, it is highly likely that no units in this building have cemetery views.

Multiple units are described with various view types, yet none reference the Hilton Hawaiian Village Friday night fireworks or any fireworks viewing from the property. In the absence of explicit fireworks-view language, it is unlikely this feature is a notable selling point based on current remarks.

Listing remarks extensively market short-term rental, resort-style amenities, and building benefits but never reference being pet-friendly or allowing dogs/cats. Given the building’s hotel/condotel operation shared with Club Wyndham and typical policies in such properties, the evidence points to pets generally not being allowed. Buyers specifically needing a pet-friendly building should assume this property is not suitable.

At least 3 listings explicitly mention an "on-site manager" or "on-site management," including remarks describing the building as offering an "on-site manager, concierge service" and another citing "on-site management." Combined with RESMAN appearing in 7/20 current MLS listings and the prior high-confidence finding, the evidence strongly supports this building feature.

Many listings clearly state that units are in a condotel, emphasizing legal daily short-term rentals, hotel-quality finishes, and management shared with Club Wyndham. References to hotel operations, Wyndham amenities, and a resort-style lobby confirm condo-hotel use. Investors specifically searching for condotel properties will find this building fits that profile perfectly.

Remarks consistently refer to units as 'Fee Simple' and describe conventional condominium/condotel ownership rather than share-based cooperative ownership. There are no textual or MLS-code indicators of a co-op structure. Buyers requiring or avoiding co-op ownership can safely treat this as a non-cooperative, fee-simple condo/condotel building.