Royal Aloha
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Royal Aloha
Building Overview
Royal Aloha in Waikiki (West Waikiki) is a 1971 concrete building with 141 units, pool, mountain views, and resident manager. Based on MLS data.
About Royal Aloha
Based on MLS data, Royal Aloha is a 16-story concrete condominium in the West Waikiki neighborhood of Waikiki. Built in 1971, the building contains 141 total units and is served by two elevators.
According to available records, onsite amenities include a pool, BBQ area, and a resident manager. Units offer central and split air conditioning and some units report mountain views.
Additional details from MLS indicate covered, assigned parking is available. Pets and short-term rentals are allowed. The building is managed by Alohana Realty. Buyers should verify all information, fees, rules and availability with the listing agent or management company as MLS data may change.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for an owner-occupancy percentage or descriptors like "majority owner occupied" or "highly owner occupied," but found none. The current value of 24% is therefore retained because there is no explicit building-level evidence to change it. A single unit being "currently owner occupied" does not establish the building-wide occupancy rate.
I searched the remarks for explicit phrases like "2 elevators," "multiple elevators," or any stated elevator quantity, but found none. The public remarks do reference an elevator in passing, which supports that the building has elevator service, but they do not confirm the count. Given the current building context and no contradictory evidence, the current value is retained at low confidence.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
Remarks on at least two separate listings specify that central A/C is a separately monitored and billed item: “Other fees please add separately monitored central A/C…,” clearly distinguishing it from what the association fee includes. With only 3 of 20 MLS entries marking ACCEN and strong textual evidence of separate billing, central A/C is not considered included in the maintenance fee.
Cable TV appears to be included at Royal Aloha. One public remark explicitly states that "water, cable and Internet are included in the maintenance fee," and the current MLS aggregate supports this with CABTV checked in 15 of 20 listings. The evidence is strong and consistent across listings, not just a single copy-paste outlier.
Common area electricity does not appear to be included in the maintenance fee. Several remarks explicitly describe it as a separate charge, which outweighs the mixed MLS checkbox data showing OTCOEX in only 8 of 20 listings. This looks more like a recurring MLS copy/paste inconsistency than a true included building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Hot water is plausibly included, but the evidence is moderate rather than explicit. The current MLS aggregate shows HOTWAT in 11 of 20 listings, while the public remarks focus on other inclusions and do not directly mention hot water. Because there is no WTRHTR signal and no contradiction, this leans true with medium confidence.
Listing text directly: "water, cable and Internet are included in the maintenance fee." Historical MLS checkboxes (13 of 20 listings with INTSER) and multiple agent remarks confirm Internet service is commonly included in the association fee.
No analysis available
MLS aggregate data shows sewer checked in 14 of 20 listings, but none of the public remarks explicitly state 'sewer included' or similar. Evidence is moderate and appears driven by MLS checkbox entries across multiple agents rather than explicit language in remarks, so include as likely true with moderate confidence.
Water appears to be included in the maintenance fee. The clearest public remark explicitly states that "water" is included, and the MLS aggregate reinforces this with WATER checked in 16 of 20 listings. This is strong, building-level evidence and appears consistent across multiple agents.
BBQ is strongly supported across the current listing set: roughly 18 of 20 MLS listings include it, and multiple public remarks explicitly say "BBQ area," "BBQ and Lounge Area," or "BBQ with friends/family." The repeated wording across different agents suggests this is a real shared building amenity, not a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Many current listings explicitly mention outdoor spaces, including phrases like “private patio with outdoor seating,” “Private Lanai,” “open lanai overlooking the Ala Wai Canal,” and “Lanai overlooks the Pool area.” Combined with 13 of 20 listings checking the patio/deck amenity and prior high-confidence data, this strongly confirms that units in this building commonly offer lanais/patios. Buyers seeking condos with balconies or lanais would find this building suitable.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
At least one listing clearly states the building includes a 'recreation room' in addition to the pool and BBQ area, while others mention a 'meeting room' or 'meeting area' as part of the amenity set. This consistent description of an indoor common room across multiple agents supports the presence of a shared recreation/meeting room in the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Several listings describe on-site storage, including 'additional storage at basement if available,' 'secure storage lockers in the basement,' and a unit conveyed with '1 storage unit.' These mentions span multiple listings and agents, and consistently refer to basement storage facilities. This provides strong evidence that the Royal Aloha offers storage units/lockers as a building amenity.
I looked for surfboard storage language including surf storage, board storage, and bike-and-surfboard storage. The remarks mention basement storage and lockers, but not dedicated surfboard storage.
No analysis available
Trash chute service appears to be a building amenity based on the current MLS pattern: about 16 of 20 listings show TRACHU, and several remarks describe trash service on each floor. While the remarks often phrase it as "trash on each floor" rather than explicitly saying "trash chute," the repeated building-level references across multiple listings support including it.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Pool evidence is very strong and consistent across the listing remarks. Multiple agents mention it explicitly in different ways—'swimming pool,' 'pool and BBQ area,' 'resort-style amenities,' and 'pool at the Upper Lobby'—which confirms this is a shared building amenity, not a one-off copy-paste error. Combined with the prior MLS pattern showing pool in all listings, this should remain true.
No analysis available
I searched for saltwater-pool wording such as salt water pool, saltwater pool, or saline pool. The building clearly has a pool, but there is no public remark indicating it is salt water.
No analysis available
Very strong evidence supports community/shared laundry at Royal Aloha. At least 10+ current remarks explicitly mention shared laundry facilities, including "community laundry on every floor and in the basement," "Community laundry on each floor & basement," and "onsite laundry," which is consistent with the prior high-confidence MLS amenities data. The mentions come from multiple listings/agents, so this does not appear to be a one-off copy-paste error.
I searched for payment-related laundry terms such as coin laundry, coin-op, card-operated machines, quarters, or laundry fees. The remarks only confirm the presence of laundry facilities, but do not say they require payment.
Public remarks repeatedly confirm laundry on every floor, including the basement in several listings. This is a strong, consistent match for community laundry facilities on every floor.
Parking is clearly available in the building for at least some units. In the current remarks, roughly 15+ listings mention parking directly, including 'one covered assigned parking stall,' '1 covered parking stall in the LL,' '1 parking,' and 'comes with 1 covered secured parking stall.' The evidence is consistent across multiple agents and appears to be legitimate listing-level detail rather than copy-paste error.
Multiple listings explicitly state assigned parking—for example, 'comes with 1 assigned parking stall & 1 storage unit' and 'current owners rent an assigned and secured parking stall in the Waikiki Landmark.' At least 4–6 separate remarks reference assigned parking or an assigned stall, while other listings note no parking or renting nearby, indicating assigned parking exists for some units (not universal).
Many listings explicitly advertise covered parking—for example, 'One (1) Covered parking stall on lobby level,' 'one covered PARKING space in the LL,' and 'comes with a covered parking stall.' At least 8–10 remarks reference covered or secured covered parking, showing strong, repeated confirmation across multiple agent remarks that covered parking is available to some units.
I looked for wording like deeded parking, owned stall, parking included in deed, or stall included with title. The remarks only describe assigned, covered, secured, or rented parking, which does not indicate deeded ownership.
No analysis available
I searched for a monthly parking charge, parking rental fee, or additional parking cost tied to the building. The remarks mention renting parking nearby, but do not provide a specific fee for building parking.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for parking waitlist language such as "join the waitlist" or "parking waiting list" and found nothing. There is no public-remarks evidence that this building uses a parking waitlist system.
No analysis available
The remarks support that the building is secured, but I found no direct mention of card or fob access. Because the feature must be determined from public remarks, I am not marking card access as present without explicit evidence.
12 of 20 listings include the SECGUA amenity and many remarks say the building is a "secured building," has "secured entry," or a "security gate," and mentions "on-site management." While several agents consistently describe the property as secured, none of the remarks explicitly reference a staffed security guard or 24/7 security personnel, so the feature is inferred from amenity checks and repeated 'secured' language rather than directly confirmed.
I searched for patrol-related terms such as security patrol, roving security, and patrolled building. The remarks reference security and a resident/on-site manager, but nothing about patrol service.
No analysis available
Strong evidence that the building has central air: historical MLS checks showed ACCEN/CENAC in several listings and ~10/20 listings had ACCEN in inclusions, and at least a dozen public remarks explicitly reference "central A/C" or a "building central AC system" (examples: "central A/C"; "building central AC system to all rooms"; "monitored central A/C"). Mentions appear across multiple agent listings and are corroborated by both unit descriptions and amenity notes, indicating a building-wide central air system is present.
Multiple listings for Royal Aloha indicate the presence of split AC systems, with one unit described as having a 'split AC system' and another noting a 'New SPLIT AC unit in the living room plus building central AC system to all rooms.' Although most other remarks reference central AC or portable units, the explicit split AC mentions from different agents and the ACSPL checkbox on 2/20 listings provide strong evidence that at least some units in this building have ductless mini-split systems. Buyers seeking split AC options would therefore find this building relevant.
Across all provided remarks, no listing explicitly mentions window or wall AC units, even in units where AC and renovations are discussed in detail. A few MLS checkboxes flag ACWIUN, but with no remark support and strong, repeated emphasis on central AC instead, this is likely agent miscoding rather than evidence of building-typical window AC. Based on the guidelines to omit features with low historical confidence and no remark support, window AC is not treated as a building feature.
Strong building-level evidence supports concrete construction. While the public remarks do not explicitly say "concrete," the MLS material field is consistent across all current listings (20/20), which is much stronger than copy-paste variation. No remarks suggest a different construction type.
Public remarks across the listings provide no support for double-wall construction; none explicitly mention "double wall," "double-wall," or similar phrasing. The current MLS checkbox appears in only 3/20 listings, which looks inconsistent and likely reflects agent data entry noise rather than a verified building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The public remarks repeatedly and clearly state that short-term rentals are allowed, including legal daily/vacation rentals. This is strong, repeated evidence that STR is permitted in the building.
I searched for hotel pool or hotel rental program language such as Hilton/Trump/Ritz pool references and found none. The listings describe STR legality, but not participation in a hotel rental pool program.
I looked for language indicating owners must participate in a rental pool or cannot opt out. The remarks instead emphasize flexibility and optional rental use, so a mandatory hotel pool is not supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The listings repeatedly identify the building as leasehold with a 2041 expiry. This is direct, consistent evidence across multiple remarks, so 2041 is the lease expiration year.
I searched the remarks for explicit VA-related language such as "VA approved," "VA financing," and "VA loans accepted" and found none. Based on the public remarks, there is no evidence this building supports VA financing.
I looked for wording like fully insured, full insurance, walls-in coverage, or fully covered by HOA, and found no such language. The remarks repeatedly discuss amenities and rental rules, but do not address insurance status. With no evidence in the public remarks, this remains unverified and is set to false with low confidence.
No analysis available
I searched for terms such as FLSE passed, fire/life safety evaluation passed, fire safety certified, and passed fire inspection, but found nothing in the public remarks. Because there is no current positive evidence, this remains unconfirmed and is treated as false with low confidence. The remarks focus on rentals, amenities, and location rather than safety certification.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence across the listings supports mountain views for the building. At least a dozen remarks mention mountain/Koolau views, often alongside canal or city views, which looks consistent across multiple agents rather than a one-off copy-paste error. Current MLS data also aligns with this pattern.
No analysis available
Strong evidence: numerous public remarks (over 10 separate remark blocks) explicitly state city or skyline views, with quotes like "Soak in city views from your private lanai" and "city, Ala Wai Canal, and mountain views." Evidence is consistent across multiple agent listings and not limited to a single copy/paste entry, supporting inclusion of building-level city views.
No analysis available
There is no meaningful remark support for garden views across the provided listings. Only 1/20 current MLS entries show GARDEN in view_descriptions, while the remarks consistently focus on canal, mountain, city, or golf-course views, so this looks like a likely MLS checkbox inconsistency rather than a true building-level feature.
No analysis available
Strong evidence across the listings supports marina/canal views for the building. Over a dozen remarks reference the Ala Wai Canal, canal views, or marina/canal views, suggesting this is a common building-level view offering rather than isolated unit marketing. The current MLS data matches the remarks well.
Across the provided remarks, there are no explicit mentions of sunrise views, morning sun, or eastern exposure, even in units that heavily market their views. With only one MLS checkbox hinting at 'SUNRIS' and no descriptive support, sunrise views are not reliably established as a notable feature for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for phrases like fireworks view, watch fireworks from the lanai, or see fireworks from the unit/building. The remarks mention canal, city, mountain, ocean, and golf course views, but nothing about fireworks visibility.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence the building has a resident/on-site manager. Multiple listings explicitly mention "on-site manager," "site manager," or "on-site management," and the feature appears consistently rather than as a one-off agent checkbox. This supports the existing high-confidence MLS data and suggests the amenity is genuinely present.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.