Ridgeway B1
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Ridgeway B1
Building Overview
Ridgeway B1 in a neighborhood not specified (MLS) — built 1972; concrete and wood-frame construction; on-site pool and assigned parking.
About Ridgeway B1
Ridgeway B1 is a condominium building identified in MLS records as built in 1972. According to available records, the building is constructed of concrete and wood frame. The MLS does not specify the neighborhood or building size in the provided data.
Based on MLS data, Ridgeway B1 offers an on-site pool and allows pets. Short-term rentals are not permitted per the listing information. The management company is listed as unknown in the available MLS details.
Parking is available and assigned according to MLS data. Specifics about maintenance fees, assessments, or other HOA policies were not provided in the data set. Buyers should verify all building details, fees, rules, and the management company through direct inquiry and review of official documents.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I looked for a percentage like '80% owner occupied' or descriptive terms such as 'majority owner occupied' or 'highly owner occupied,' but found nothing. With no numeric figure in the remarks and no current value provided, the owner-occupancy rate is unknown.
I searched the public remarks for any explicit elevator count or even a generic reference to elevators, but found none. Because this is a numeric field and no current value was provided, it remains unknown from the remarks.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No listings' remarks mention cable TV being included and only 1 of 4 current MLS records has CABTV checked. With no historical confirmation or remarks describing cable service as part of HOA fees, there is little evidence the building reliably includes cable in maintenance fees.
The building appears to include common area electricity based on MLS checkbox data: 3 of 5 current listings have OTCOEX checked, with prior historical data also pointing the same way. None of the public remarks explicitly mention common electric, which suggests the MLS data may be copy-paste rather than remark-confirmed, but the pattern still leans true.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is strong evidence that hot water is not included: no current listings check HOTWAT, while some list WTRHTR, which typically means units have their own water heaters. The remarks are silent on hot-water service, so the MLS pattern and the heater indicator are the best evidence here.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer is consistently included across the building, with 5 of 5 current listings marking SEWER in association fees. No remarks contradict that, and the all-listings pattern suggests this is a stable building-level amenity rather than a one-off agent error.
Water is consistently included across the building, with all 5 current listings showing WATER in association_fee_includes. The public remarks do not mention water separately, but the unanimous MLS data makes this a high-confidence building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
At least two listing remarks explicitly describe private outdoor spaces: one references an 'attractive and spacious private courtyard' and another an 'inviting outdoor porch that leads to a cozy, enclosed yard.' Although only 1/4 MLS checkboxes currently list PATDEC/COVPAT, the explicit language in multiple agent remarks supports including patio/deck as a building feature available to some units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
One of four current listings (and the provided public remarks) explicitly mentions shared amenities: 'community pool, playground,' which qualify as a building recreation area. Historical checkbox data is limited (1/4 listings) but the remarks give a clear, explicit statement of recreational amenities; agents may copy/paste, but the direct mention supports including the feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence that the building has a shared pool. All current MLS listings include the pool amenity, and 3 of the provided remarks explicitly reference a 'community pool' or 'pool' as a neighborhood amenity. The consistency across multiple listings suggests this is a real building-level feature, not just copy-paste noise.
No analysis available
No analysis available
In-unit laundry is supported by the MLS inclusions across all current listings: 5/5 list "WASHER/DRYER." Historical data was also consistent, so this appears to be a stable building feature rather than a copy-paste anomaly. No remarks mention it explicitly, but the repeated inclusions are strong enough to confirm it.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Parking is strongly confirmed across the listings. Multiple remarks from different agents explicitly describe two stalls, including phrases like "2 assigned parking stalls," "two side-by-side parking stalls," and "two dedicated parking stalls," which aligns with the historical MLS data showing parking on every listing.
Assigned parking is very well supported. The remarks consistently mention assigned or dedicated stalls across multiple listings, and this is reinforced by the MLS checkbox data showing ASSIGN on 4 of 5 records. The evidence appears consistent rather than a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit deeded/owned parking language such as "deeded parking," "owned stall," or "parking included in deed." The listings only mention assigned or dedicated stalls, which does not establish deeded ownership.
No analysis available
I looked for any extra parking cost language, including monthly parking fees or rental charges. None were mentioned, so there is no basis to assign a parking fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for references to a parking waitlist system, such as "join waitlist for parking" or "parking waiting list." The remarks do not mention any such system.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence for window AC is weak: 2 of 5 current MLS listings include ACWIUN, but none of the remarks mention window air conditioners, window units, or wall AC. Because the remarks across multiple listings consistently describe other features without any AC detail, this may be an unverified MLS checkbox rather than a confirmed building amenity.
No analysis available
Two of four recent MLS listings list double-wall construction (DOUWAL), but the public remarks do not mention double-wall construction and there is no prior verification. This suggests some units/buildings may be listed as double-wall, but the evidence comes only from agent-entered MLS fields (possible copy/paste), so include the feature with moderate confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Wood frame construction appears to be a stable building-level feature. Current MLS data shows WOOFRA in 5/5 listings, and there is no remark-based evidence suggesting otherwise. The consistency across listings suggests this is likely copy-pasted but still reliable because it is repeatedly corroborated in MLS.
There is little support for above-ground construction in the public remarks, which focus on views, layout, pool, parking, and location rather than construction method. Only 1/5 current MLS listings mark ABOGRO, so this does not look like a building-wide feature and may reflect copy/paste or checkbox drift.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for explicit STR language like "short-term rental allowed," "NUC," or "TVU." The listings do not say STR is allowed, so it is not confirmed as permitted from the public remarks.
I searched for hotel pool references such as "hotel rental pool," "Hilton pool," or similar programs. There is no indication in the remarks that this building participates in a hotel rental pool.
I looked for language indicating mandatory participation in a rental pool, such as "required to participate" or "cannot opt out." The remarks contain no such statements, so mandatory participation is not supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for leasehold references and specific expiration years like "lease expires 2050" or "ground lease ends". The remarks do not mention land tenure or any lease expiry date, so the value remains unknown.
I searched the remarks for any VA-related financing language such as "VA approved" or "VA loans accepted" and found none. With no evidence in the listings, this is treated as not confirmed.
I searched for references to full HOA insurance, walls-in coverage, or comprehensive building insurance, but found no such language in the remarks. Since there is no explicit mention and no current value supplied, this remains unconfirmed.
No analysis available
I looked for language indicating the building passed a fire/life safety evaluation, fire inspection, or similar certification, but nothing in the remarks اشاره. With no current value provided and no supporting text, the safest reading is that it is not documented here.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Ocean views are mentioned in multiple remarks, including "Ocean, mountain and city views" and "gaze out at the blue ocean." This looks like genuine building-level view availability rather than a copy-paste checkbox, since the remarks describe the view from the lanai and match the MLS view description data.
Mountain views are directly stated in the public remarks, including "Ocean, mountain and city views" and "mountain, cool breezes." The repeated mentions across listings suggest this is a real building feature, not just an unchecked MLS artifact.
No analysis available
City views appear in at least one listing's remarks and are also reflected in the MLS view data. The evidence is limited but explicit, so this is a credible building-level view feature.
No current remarks mention coastline, shoreline, or coastal views, and the MLS view descriptions do not provide direct support for this feature. This appears to be absent rather than merely unreported in the available listings.
No analysis available
Golf course views are very strongly supported. Multiple remarks explicitly describe frontage on the golf course, a location beside the 15th hole, and views toward the fairway/green, which aligns with the MLS view descriptions.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across 3 recent listings, none describe sunset views, western exposure, or similar features, and sunset is absent from all MLS view fields. Agents highlight other positives (pool, courtyard, location) but do not market any view-related benefits. This consistent omission across multiple listings suggests the building is not known for sunset views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across the provided listings, 0 mention a resident manager, live-in manager, on-site manager, or building manager on property. The only support is a single MLS amenity checkbox in 1 of 5 listings, which is not reinforced by remarks and appears likely to be unchecked/unchecked-style MLS noise rather than a confirmed building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.