Regency Park

No analysis available

I searched for numeric owner-occupancy percentages and qualitative indicators such as "majority owner occupied" or "highly owner occupied." No such references appear in the remarks. Without explicit evidence, the owner-occupancy rate remains unknown.

I looked for explicit elevator counts such as "4 elevators," "multiple elevators," or a spelled-out number. The remarks only confirm that the building has elevators, not how many. Because no count is stated, the value remains unknown.

Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.

No analysis available

Cable inclusion is strongly supported across the building: 18 of 20 MLS listings mark CABTV, and several remarks directly mention cable TV or bulk cable charges. The wording is consistent across multiple listings and agents, suggesting this is a genuine building-level fee inclusion rather than a copy-paste error.

Common area electricity appears to be included based on 19 of 20 MLS listings marking OTCOEX. Public remarks do not usually say 'common area electricity' outright, so this is largely MLS-derived and slightly less explicit than the water/sewer evidence.

No analysis available

No analysis available

No analysis available

Not included: strong evidence that hot water is unit-supplied and not covered by maintenance fees — 13 of 20 listings reference in-unit water heaters (e.g., 'new water heater'), and only 1/20 had HOTWAT checked. Remarks repeatedly mention new/replaced water heaters, indicating hot water is not an association-paid utility.

Moderate evidence: several listings explicitly list 'internet included' or name building-provided internet (e.g., 'ACW Ultra Internet 500/20 w Wi‑Fi'), while other listings explicitly state internet is not included. With 7 of 20 MLS checkboxes and some explicit remarks, the building offers internet in at least some contexts, but coverage appears inconsistent.

No analysis available

Sewer inclusion is extremely well supported: all 20 MLS listings include SEWER, and several remarks explicitly confirm that maintenance fees cover sewer. This is consistent across the dataset and does not look like a mistaken checkbox pattern.

Water inclusion is confirmed by every MLS listing in the set (20/20), with several remarks directly stating that the maintenance fee covers water. The evidence is consistent and high confidence across multiple agents and remarks.

Overwhelming evidence: all 20 of 20 current MLS listings list BBQ and numerous remarks mention 'BBQ area', 'BBQ areas', or 'barbecue area', indicating a clearly established shared grilling amenity in the building.

No analysis available

No analysis available

Evidence against: car wash had low historical confidence (7/20 MLS checkboxes) and there are no public-remarks references to 'car wash', 'auto wash', or similar across the listings. Given the absence in agent text and low checkbox frequency, treat car wash as not present.

There is solid evidence for a clubhouse/community-center type amenity, though not as universal as the tennis or pool features. One listing explicitly says "clubhouse," and the MLS data shows 13 of 20 listings with the clubhouse amenity checked. Overall, this supports inclusion as a building-level feature.

No analysis available

While many ads state the building is pet-friendly ("pet friendly", "no breed or size limits"), there are no explicit mentions of a dog park or dog run in the remarks. Given lack of textual support and only 2 MLS checks, conclude there is no documented dog park.

No analysis available

This feature is strongly supported across many listings. Remarks repeatedly say "private gym," "exercise room," "workout room," and "gym," and the current MLS data shows 17 of 20 listings with the exercise amenity checked. The consistency across multiple agents suggests this is a real shared building amenity, not a copy-paste error.

No analysis available

Moderate-to-strong evidence: about 13 of 20 MLS listings include meeting/conference/party room in amenities and multiple remarks state 'Meeting and Party room' or 'clubhouse/party room', so the building offers a shared meeting/party room.

Strong evidence the building offers patios/decks: public remarks across the aggregated listings repeatedly cite lanais, covered lanais, private patios and enclosed lanais (e.g., "2 spacious lanais", "covered lanai", "private outdoor patio", "enclosed lanai"). This matches prior high-confidence MLS data (over a dozen listings referenced lanais) and multiple agents consistently mention outdoor living spaces rather than a single isolated mention, indicating the feature is widely available in the building.

The building appears to offer shared walking/jogging paths or trails. Remarks specifically reference "walking paths," "walking/jogging path," "walking/jogging trails," and "well-lit walkways," and the MLS data shows 14 of 20 listings with the path amenity. This is strong enough to treat as a real amenity.

No analysis available

Multiple listings (approximately 6–8) explicitly reference private outdoor spaces such as a "317 sf courtyard", "your own lanai and garden", "spacious backyard unit" and "private yard along". These unit-level courtyard/yard descriptions are specific and recur across different listings/agents, supporting inclusion of private_yard for the building.

No analysis available

The building clearly offers a shared recreation amenity. Multiple listings cite a "recreation room," "recreation area," or "rec room," and the current MLS data shows 16 of 20 listings checking recreation-related amenities. This appears to be a genuine building feature reinforced by many agents.

Moderate evidence: 9 of 20 current MLS listings list a recreation room and several agent remarks explicitly say 'recreation room' or 'rec room'. While not as ubiquitous as other amenities, multiple listings confirm a shared recreation/rec room on site.

No analysis available

No analysis available

No analysis available

Only 1 of 20 current MLS listings includes STORAG/ADDLVSTORAG in building amenities; no listings' public remarks explicitly mention storage lockers or on-site storage rooms (remarks only include a unit-level phrase like "lots of storage"). Evidence is sparse and inconsistent across agents, so storage units may exist but the data is weak—treat as possible but unconfirmed.

I looked for any reference to surfboard-specific storage facilities and found none. The remarks mention general storage and bike racks, but nothing that confirms surfboard storage.

This is one of the clearest amenities in the building. Remarks across many listings explicitly mention "tennis courts," "tennis court," and even tennis/pickleball courts, while the MLS data shows 19 of 20 listings flagging tennis. The evidence is consistent and very high confidence.

This feature is supported by the MLS amenity data more than by the remarks themselves. Although no listing text explicitly calls out a "trash chute" or "garbage chute," 15 of 20 current MLS entries include TRACHU, which suggests the building likely has one. Confidence is moderate because the remarks look more like checkbox carryover than direct confirmation.

No analysis available

No analysis available

No analysis available

Strong, consistent evidence that Regency Park has a pool. Across the provided remarks, roughly 25+ listings explicitly mention a pool or swimming pool, often alongside shared amenities like tennis courts, gym, BBQ areas, and the private park. The evidence is highly consistent across multiple agents and aligns with the historical MLS data, so confidence is very high.

No analysis available

I looked for explicit salt-pool language such as "saltwater pool" or "saline pool" and found none. Since the remarks only confirm that there is a pool, this feature is not supported.

There is overwhelming evidence that the building offers in-unit laundry. Multiple listings across different units and agents explicitly mention "full-size washer & dryer," "in-unit washer/dryer," and "washer/dryer in unit," and the current MLS data shows washer/dryer included in 20/20 listings. The consistency across many remarks suggests this is a real building-level feature rather than copy-paste noise.

No analysis available

I looked for public remarks indicating coin-op, card-operated, or paid shared laundry facilities and found no such references. The only laundry mentions are in-unit appliances, so there is no evidence for a paid community laundry setup.

I searched for explicit references to community laundry located on each floor, such as "laundry on every floor" or "floor-by-floor laundry," and found none. The public remarks instead point to in-unit laundry, which does not support this building-level feature.

Parking is strongly confirmed across the building: essentially every listing references parking, and the MLS data shows 20/20 listings with parking features. Public remarks repeatedly mention phrases like "2 assigned parking stalls," "2 covered parking stalls," "2 parking spaces," and "parking garage," indicating this is a consistent building-level feature rather than a one-off note.

Assigned parking is very well supported: the MLS flags it on all 20 listings, and the remarks consistently describe the parking as assigned or reserved. Examples include "2 assigned parking stalls," "two assigned parking stalls," and "2 assigned covered parking," which is strong multi-listing confirmation.

Covered parking is strongly supported by both MLS data and remarks. The remarks include multiple explicit references such as "2 covered assigned parking stalls in the parking garage," "two covered parking stalls," and "1 covered, 1-open," showing the building offers covered parking for at least some units.

I looked for language such as deeded parking, owned stalls, or parking included in deed and did not find it. The listings consistently mention assigned/covered stalls, which suggests parking is present but not explicitly deeded.

No analysis available

I searched for any additional parking cost, rental fee, or monthly parking charge and found none. The remarks list parking stalls but do not indicate that parking costs extra.

Guest parking is confirmed by a substantial number of listings and repeated public remarks. The building is described as having "guest parking," "plenty of guest parking," "22 guest stalls," and "20 guest parking stalls," which is strong evidence that guest parking is available building-wide.

Secured entry/security is supported by the MLS flags and repeated remark language. While not every listing mentions it, multiple remarks say "secured entry," "secured building," "gated secure entry," and "24-hour security," which is sufficient evidence that the building has secured-access parking/building entry features.

No analysis available

No analysis available

I looked for references to a parking waitlist, waiting list, or joining a list for parking and found nothing. With no evidence in the remarks, I cannot confirm a waitlist exists.

No analysis available

I searched for card/fob-based access wording and did not find it in the remarks. While the building is clearly described as secured, the public remarks do not confirm a card-access system.

Security guard service is strongly supported across the building’s remarks and historical MLS data. At least 15+ listings explicitly mention it, with recurring wording such as "24-hour security," "24/7 security," "on-site security staff," and "security guard," suggesting this is a stable building feature rather than a copy-paste anomaly. No credible evidence suggests it has been removed.

This feature is directly supported by the remarks. The listing explicitly mentions resident courtesy patrol services on-site, which is strong evidence of security patrol service.

No analysis available

No analysis available

Split AC is strongly supported by many current listings, not just the MLS checkbox data. At least 8+ remarks explicitly mention split, mini-split, or individual AC units, including detailed references such as "brand new Mitsubishi split AC units" and "split system AC in every room." The evidence appears consistent across multiple agents and looks like a real building feature rather than copy-paste noise.

MLS inclusions show ACWIUN checked on 8 of 20 current listings. None of the public remarks mention 'window AC', 'window unit', or 'wall AC'; many listings explicitly state 'split AC', 'split system AC', or 'Mitsubishi split AC units'. Evidence that window units exist is coming only from MLS checkboxes (8 listings) and not from agent remarks, so inclusion is uncertain but some units may have window AC.

All 20 current MLS listings for this building list construction materials as 'CONCRE' (reinforced concrete). None of the public remarks explicitly mention construction type, but the uniform 20/20 MLS checkbox entries across multiple listings/agents provide strong, consistent evidence that the building is concrete-constructed.

Minor MLS signal: 4 of 20 listings checked 'DOUWAL' for double-wall construction, but none of the public remarks in the dataset mention 'double wall' or provide supporting detail. This is low-confidence, inconsistent data that could be agent copy/paste; include as possible but with low confidence.

Very limited MLS support (1/20 listings) and zero mentions in public remarks. With no corroborating agent remarks or multiple listings describing 'hollow tile' construction, the evidence indicates the building is not meaningfully described as hollow tile construction.

A minority of current listings (4/20) show MASSTU in construction_materials, but 16/20 do not, and none of the public remarks reference masonry or stucco construction. Given the strong, consistent evidence for concrete construction and the known tendency for agents to mis-click or copy/paste checkboxes, masonry/stucco construction is not supported and is treated as absent at the building level.

No analysis available

Only 3 of 20 current MLS listings include the SLAB tag and none of the many public remarks mention 'concrete slab' or a slab foundation. Given the lack of any explicit references in remarks across many listings and the low prevalence in MLS checkbox data, the slab-foundation tag appears to be an inconsistent entry and is omitted (set false) with high confidence.

No analysis available

No analysis available

Five of 20 listings include the ABOGRO tag, and many public remarks repeatedly mention high-floor/upper-floor/penthouse units and 'two private residential towers' (e.g., 'top floor', '11th floor', 'penthouse'), implying above-ground multi-story construction. This is implied across numerous agent remarks rather than explicitly labeled as 'above ground construction' in remarks, so confidence is moderate.

No analysis available

No analysis available

A 30-day minimum rental period means short-term rentals are not allowed under the provided definition. The remarks consistently point to long-term leasing rather than STR use.

I searched for hotel rental pool references such as hotel program, managed-by-hotel, or branded pool participation and found none. Since STR is not allowed, hotel pool participation must also be false.

I looked for language indicating required participation in a hotel rental pool or no opt-out policy and found nothing. Because there is no evidence of any hotel pool program, mandatory pool participation is false.

No analysis available

No analysis available

The remarks clearly identify the building as leasehold and give a specific expiration year. I used the explicit year 2036 as the lease expiry.

I searched the listings for explicit VA loan approval language and found none. Because the remarks do not state VA eligibility, I cannot confirm that the building is VA approved.

Multiple listings directly confirm full building insurance coverage. Phrases like "The building is 100% Insured" and "100% hurricane coverage is in place" are strong, explicit evidence. This feature is supported with very high confidence.

No analysis available

I searched the remarks for any explicit fire/life safety evaluation language, including FLSE, fire safety certified, and passed fire inspection. The only related language was smoke alarms and a PA system, which does not confirm an FLSE pass. There is no direct evidence that this feature is true.

Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.

No analysis available

No analysis available

Mountain views are supported by several public remarks, including explicit phrases like "mountain view" and references to the mauka/cooler side. The evidence aligns with the prior high-confidence summary that multiple agents have described mountain or mauka-oriented views, so this appears to be a real building feature rather than a copy-paste checkbox artifact.

No analysis available

City views are very well supported: numerous listings mention "city views," "peaceful skyline views," "city and coastline," and Diamond Head/ city combinations. With roughly 10+ remarks pointing to urban views and the historical data already showing many CITY view entries, this is a clear building-level feature.

No analysis available

Multiple agent remarks consistently reference garden or courtyard exposures — approximately 12 separate listing remarks mention phrases like "garden views," "courtyard," "backyard unit," or "your own lanai and garden." Historical MLS view_descriptions also recorded GARDEN for 8 of 20 listings, and the current remarks come from different listings/agents rather than a single copy/paste source, supporting a high confidence that the building offers garden views.

No analysis available

No analysis available

No analysis available

Sunset views are corroborated by several remarks, most clearly with phrases like "city, sunset & Punchbowl in the distance" and "vibrant Hawaiian sunsets." While fewer listings mention it than city views, the repeated explicit references across different remarks make this a credible feature of some units in the building.

No analysis available

I searched for wording like "fireworks view," "watch fireworks from the lanai," or similar statements about seeing fireworks from the building. None were found in the remarks, so this feature is not supported.

No analysis available

No analysis available

Strong, repeated evidence across the listings supports that Regency Park has a resident/on-site manager. I found explicit mentions in many remarks, including "resident manager," "onsite manager," "site manager," and "on-site manager," often alongside security and maintenance references. This appears to be consistent across multiple agents rather than a one-off copy-paste claim.

No analysis available

No analysis available