Regency Park

No analysis available

I searched for explicit owner-occupancy percentages and qualitative statements about the resident mix, but the public remarks did not include any such information. Without a stated percentage or clear owner-occupancy description, the value cannot be determined from these listings.

I looked for explicit elevator-count phrasing such as "4 elevators," "four elevators," or "multiple elevators," but none of the public remarks provided a number. The listings do confirm the building has elevators, but not how many, so the count remains unknown.

Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.

No analysis available

Cable TV inclusion is very well supported across the building. Several listings explicitly say things like “Other fee of $54.50 is for cable TV,” “Cable + Internet: $54.50,” and “Maintenance fees: ... basic cable,” which is consistent with the MLS checkbox pattern. The evidence appears broad and repetitive across multiple agents, not a one-off.

Common-area electricity is strongly indicated by the MLS data, with 18 of 20 current listings marked OTCOEX. Public remarks generally do not describe this utility directly, which is common for this type of building-level expense. The repeated MLS pattern makes this a high-confidence building feature.

No analysis available

Electricity inclusion is not supported by the building’s remarks and is almost entirely absent from current MLS checkbox data, with only 1 of 20 listings showing ELECTR. Given the lack of explicit mention and the low prevalence, this is best treated as not included in the maintenance fee.

No analysis available

Hot water does not appear to be included in the maintenance fee. The MLS data is especially persuasive here: 0 of 20 listings show HOTWAT, while 13 of 20 include WTRHTR, a strong signal that units have their own water heaters rather than building-supplied hot water. Public remarks also do not support a shared hot-water fee.

Internet inclusion has moderate but meaningful support. Some remarks explicitly mention internet/Wi‑Fi in the fee package, including "ACW Ultra internet Wi-Fi" and "Cable + Internet," but at least one listing says "internet is not included." Overall the evidence suggests this is offered in some association fee packages, though not uniformly in every listing.

No analysis available

Sewer inclusion is extremely well supported. Multiple remarks explicitly say “Maintenance fee covers water & sewer,” while current MLS data shows SEWER in 19 of 20 listings. This is consistent across listings and appears to be a true building-level inclusion.

Water inclusion is strongly confirmed. Several remarks explicitly mention maintenance fees covering water, including one that says “Maintenance fees: water, security, resident manager, basic cable, and amenities,” and the MLS data shows WATER in 19 of 20 listings. This is consistent across the building and highly reliable.

BBQ/grilling facilities are mentioned in many listings, often alongside pool, park, and recreation amenities. The repeated wording across different remarks suggests genuine building-level support rather than a one-off copy-paste error.

No analysis available

No analysis available

No public remarks provided here reference a car wash facility, unlike the other amenities that are repeatedly and explicitly described. The absence of any mention across a large set of remarks suggests this feature should not be carried forward.

Clubhouse/community-center type amenities are clearly referenced in multiple remarks, including direct use of the word 'clubhouse.' While mentioned less often than pool or tennis, the evidence is still strong and building-level.

No analysis available

While many ads state the building is pet-friendly ("pet friendly", "no breed or size limits"), there are no explicit mentions of a dog park or dog run in the remarks. Given lack of textual support and only 2 MLS checks, conclude there is no documented dog park.

No analysis available

This amenity is repeatedly mentioned across the listing remarks, with several descriptions using direct phrases like 'exercise gym,' 'private gym,' 'workout room,' and 'gym.' The evidence is strong and consistent across multiple agents, making this a clear building-level feature.

No analysis available

There is moderate-to-strong support for a meeting/community room. The clearest phrasing is "Party/ Meeting Room," with related community gathering-room language appearing in other listings. This is consistent enough to treat as a building amenity.

The evidence is very strong: dozens of listings mention outdoor areas including 'lanai/patio area,' '2 lanais,' 'covered lanai,' 'private patios,' and 'spacious lanai.' This appears consistent across multiple agents and listings, not just isolated copy-paste, so patio/deck amenities should be included.

This amenity is well supported across the remarks. Several listings directly cite walking/jogging paths or trails, sometimes as part of the building’s private grounds. The repeated phrasing makes this a high-confidence feature.

No analysis available

Multiple listings explicitly describe private outdoor ground-space features, including 'private yard,' '317 sf courtyard,' 'courtyard garden,' and 'own lanai and garden.' The evidence appears across several remarks and is not limited to MLS checkbox data, so private_yard is strongly supported for this building.

No analysis available

Several listings describe shared amenity space using recreation-oriented language such as 'recreation center,' 'recreation room,' and 'rec room.' The consistency across remarks supports this as a real common-area feature rather than isolated agent wording.

There is clear multi-listing support for a recreation room. Listings reference "recreation room," "rec room," and similar phrasing, usually in amenity lists. This appears to be a real shared building amenity rather than a checkbox artifact.

No analysis available

No analysis available

No analysis available

Only 1 of 20 current MLS listings includes STORAG/ADDLVSTORAG in building amenities; no listings' public remarks explicitly mention storage lockers or on-site storage rooms (remarks only include a unit-level phrase like "lots of storage"). Evidence is sparse and inconsistent across agents, so storage units may exist but the data is weak—treat as possible but unconfirmed.

I searched the remarks for surfboard storage references, including combined storage amenities, and found nothing. Some listings mention general storage or bike racks, but not surfboard-specific storage facilities.

Tennis facilities are one of the most consistently referenced amenities in the remarks. Multiple listings mention the feature directly, often together with pool, gym, and park amenities, indicating robust building-level availability.

The remarks do not support a trash chute system. One listing mentions being near the trash room, but that is not evidence of a chute. Since no listing explicitly references a trash/garbage chute, this feature appears unsupported in the public remarks.

No analysis available

No analysis available

No analysis available

Pool evidence is overwhelming and consistent across the listings. Multiple remarks explicitly say 'pool' or 'swimming pool,' including phrases like 'amenities include a pool,' 'swimming pool,' and 'resort-style amenities,' appearing across many different agents and listing versions. This looks like a stable shared building amenity, not copy-paste error or a temporary feature change.

No analysis available

I searched the remarks for explicit salt-pool language and found only general references to a pool, swimming pool, or resort-style amenities. There is no public remark evidence that the pool is salt water.

Strong, consistent evidence supports in-unit laundry at Regency Park. Well over 15 listings explicitly mention it across many different remarks and agents, using multiple phrasings such as 'washer/dryer in unit,' 'full-size washer & dryer,' and 'in-unit laundry,' so this does not look like a copy-paste error. The feature should be retained with very high confidence.

No analysis available

I looked for public remarks indicating paid community laundry, such as coin-op machines, card-operated washers, or laundry fees. The remarks describe in-unit laundry in several listings, but do not mention any paid shared laundry facility.

I searched the remarks for phrases like "laundry on every floor," "laundry room on each floor," and similar wording, but found none. The listings only mention in-unit washers/dryers or a laundry room in a unit, which does not support this building amenity.

Parking is clearly confirmed throughout the building. Multiple listings mention phrases like "2 parking stalls," "4 parking stalls," "2 parking spaces," and "parking garage," and the MLS data shows parking features on all 20/20 listings. The evidence is consistent across many agents and appears strongly supported rather than a copy-paste anomaly.

Assigned parking is well supported. Several remarks explicitly state "2 assigned parking stalls," "two assigned parking stalls," and "2 assigned covered parking stalls," matching the high MLS checkbox rate. This looks like a real building-level feature, not just one-off listing copy.

Covered parking is strongly confirmed. Remarks include "2 covered parking stalls," "2 parking stalls in garage-accessed," and "2 assigned covered parking stalls in the parking garage," consistent with the MLS coverage. Evidence is repeated across many listings and agents.

I looked for phrases like "deeded parking," "owned stall," and "parking included in deed," and did not find any. Multiple listings clearly describe the stalls as assigned, attached, covered, or included, which suggests parking is offered but not explicitly deeded in the public remarks.

No analysis available

I searched for parking fee language such as "monthly parking charge," "parking rental," or other extra parking costs, but found nothing specific. The listings repeatedly state the number of stalls included or assigned, and none mention a separate parking fee.

Guest parking is clearly available at Regency Park. Multiple listings mention "guest parking," "ample guest parking," "lots of guest parking stalls," and even specific counts like "20 guest parking stalls" and "22 guest stalls." The evidence is repeated across several listings and aligns with the MLS guest-parking flags.

Secured-entry parking/building access is supported by both MLS flags and many remarks. Listings describe "secured access," "gated secure entry," "security checkpoint," and "secure community," while others note 24-hour security and secured building doors. The evidence is consistent enough to keep this feature enabled.

No analysis available

No analysis available

I looked for terms like "parking waitlist," "parking waiting list," and "join waitlist for parking" and found none. The remarks instead emphasize that the building has ample, guest, assigned, or included parking, with no public indication of a waitlist process.

No analysis available

The remarks repeatedly mention secured entry, gated access, security guards, and 24-hour security, but not a card/fob access system. Because the feature definition requires explicit card-style access in public remarks, I cannot confirm it from the listings.

Security guard service is strongly supported across the building’s remarks and MLS history. Roughly 15+ listings explicitly reference 24-hour/24-7 security or on-site security, and several mention related wording like “security guard,” “security checkpoint,” and “courtesy patrol services on-site.” The evidence appears consistent across multiple agents rather than a copy-paste anomaly.

This feature is directly supported by the remarks. The clearest evidence is the explicit mention of resident courtesy patrol services on-site, along with multiple references to 24-hour security and on-site security staff.

No analysis available

No analysis available

Strong evidence that Regency Park offers split AC in some units. At least 6 listings explicitly mention it with phrases like 'split AC in the bedrooms,' 'split AC system,' 'brand new Mitsubishi split AC units,' and 'split system AC in every room.' This appears consistent across multiple agents and is not just a checkbox copy-paste artifact.

Evidence for window AC is weak in the remarks themselves: none explicitly mention window units, and the AC descriptions are mostly split system, individual AC units, portable AC, or generic "new AC's." However, the current MLS inclusions still show ACWIUN in 8 of 20 listings, so the building likely offers some form of window AC in at least some units, though this does not appear clearly verified by remarks.

Concrete construction is strongly supported by the MLS data, with 18 of 20 current listings coded CONCRE. The public remarks across many agents describe the same building without contradicting this, so this appears to be a stable building-level feature rather than copy-paste noise.

Double-wall construction is not supported by the remarks, and the MLS signal is limited to 5 of 20 listings. With no explicit agent/site-visit confirmation and the building otherwise repeatedly presented as a concrete high-rise, this feature is best treated as absent.

Very limited MLS support (1/20 listings) and zero mentions in public remarks. With no corroborating agent remarks or multiple listings describing 'hollow tile' construction, the evidence indicates the building is not meaningfully described as hollow tile construction.

Masonry/stucco is not supported by the public remarks: none of the listings explicitly describe the building as masonry or stucco constructed. With only 5 of 20 current MLS listings coded MASSTU and no corroborating agent remarks, the evidence points to inconsistent checkbox data rather than a confirmed building feature.

No analysis available

Only 3 of 20 current MLS listings include the SLAB tag and none of the many public remarks mention 'concrete slab' or a slab foundation. Given the lack of any explicit references in remarks across many listings and the low prevalence in MLS checkbox data, the slab-foundation tag appears to be an inconsistent entry and is omitted (set false) with high confidence.

No analysis available

No analysis available

Evidence is limited and mostly indirect: 3 of 20 current listings carry the ABOGRO tag, while the remarks focus on floor level, towers, and penthouse/upper-floor units rather than construction method. Because this appears in MLS data but not in agent remarks, it may be copy-pasted and should be treated as moderate-to-low confidence.

No analysis available

No analysis available

I searched for STR permission terms like NUC, TVU, vacation rental allowed, or legal short-term rental. The clearest rule found is a 30-day minimum rental period, which means short-term rentals are not allowed in this building.

I looked for hotel pool, hotel-managed, Hilton/Trump/Ritz pool, or similar branded rental-program language and found none. Since STR is not allowed, hotel pool participation is also false.

I searched for language indicating owners must participate in a rental pool or cannot opt out, but found none. The remarks support standard condo use with a 30-day minimum rental rule, so there is no mandatory pool program.

No analysis available

No analysis available

The building is clearly identified as leasehold in the remarks. The most direct and recent lease expiration year stated is 2036, and I found no later extension or renewal.

I searched the public remarks for explicit VA-related language such as "VA approved," "VA financing," and "VA loans accepted," but found none. The remarks focus on parking, amenities, and unit upgrades, so there is no public evidence to support VA loan approval.

The remarks repeatedly and directly confirm full building insurance coverage. This is strong, consistent evidence across multiple listings, so the building should be treated as fully insured.

No analysis available

I searched the remarks for any explicit fire/life safety evaluation or inspection-pass language, including FLSE-related terms, and found none. Because this feature is only determined from public remarks and there is no qualifying mention, there is no evidence to mark it as passed.

Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.

No analysis available

No analysis available

Mountain views are well supported across multiple listings, with several remarks explicitly using phrases like 'mountain views' and 'mountain view.' The evidence appears consistent across different agents and units, not just copy-paste checkbox data, so this feature should be included.

Strong evidence from multiple listings confirms Diamond Head views are available in this building. At least 6+ remarks explicitly reference 'Diamond Head view,' 'DH view,' or 'Diamond Head/City views,' and the feature appears across different agents rather than a single copy-paste remark. Current MLS data also shows 4/20 listings with DIAHEA, so this should be treated as a valid building-level view option for some units.

City views are strongly corroborated across many listings and appear in varied wording, including 'city views,' 'sweeping views of the city and coastline,' 'peaceful skyline views,' and 'Diamond Head/City views.' This is broad enough to indicate the building offers city-view units, not merely a one-off mischeck.

No analysis available

Strong, repeated evidence shows this building offers garden/courtyard/greenery views in some units. Across many listings, agents mention phrases like 'garden views,' 'courtyard views,' 'overlook greenery,' 'treetop garden & mountain views,' and 'courtyard garden,' suggesting this is a real building feature rather than a one-off MLS error. The evidence appears consistent across multiple listings and multiple agents.

No analysis available

No analysis available

Sunrise views/exposure are well supported by the remarks. Multiple listings explicitly reference "sunrise," "Eastern Morning sunrises," and east-facing units, which aligns with the feature definition. The evidence is consistent enough to include this as a building-level offering for some units.

Sunset views are strongly supported for Regency Park. Multiple listings explicitly mention "beautiful sunset views," "vibrant Hawaiian sunsets," and sunset-oriented city/skyline views, often alongside Diamond Head, ocean, or coastline references. This appears consistent across several agents rather than a copy-paste MLS checkbox artifact.

No analysis available

The remarks directly confirm that units have views of the Friday night fireworks, not just proximity to the fireworks area. This is repeated clearly enough to support a high-confidence true value.

No analysis available

No analysis available

The evidence is very strong and consistent across many listings. Multiple remarks explicitly mention a resident manager or equivalent on-site oversight, including phrases like "resident manager," "onsite management," "site manager," and "on-site manager." This appears to be repeated by different agents rather than a one-off copy-paste error, so the building should be marked as having a resident manager.

No analysis available

No analysis available