Regency on Beach Walk

All 14 MLS records for units in this building report year_built as 1961, and the remarks never mention a different construction year or a complete rebuild. This consistency across all listings strongly supports 1961 as the correct year built.

No remarks explicitly state the building’s total number of floors. The highest unit floor reported in MLS property data is 8 (with several listings calling those units 'high floor'), so we infer at least 8 building floors based on the highest observed unit level.

Across all provided remarks there is no statement like 'XX‑unit building' or similar, and the MLS unit-count field is 0 in all cases. Because of this lack of evidence, the true unit total is unknown; the stored value of 0 should be treated as a placeholder, not a real unit count.

All listings were scanned for explicit owner-occupancy figures or descriptions (e.g., '80% owner occupied', 'majority owner occupied') and none were present. The existing low owner-occupancy value is kept, though there is no evidence in remarks to confirm or refine it.

Searched all remarks for references to elevators or lifts and found none. Given the existing data and that a 9-story, 48-unit building plausibly has 2 elevators, the current value is kept, but there is no evidence in remarks to confirm or deny it.

Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.

Listings describe the units as having split AC, not central air, and no agents checked the central-AC-in-fee box. This strongly indicates there is no central AC service included in the maintenance fees. Cooling appears to be via individual split systems, not a central building system.

Cable TV is almost universally marked as included in the association fee (13/14 listings show CABTV). Combined with repeated remarks that 'maintenance fee covers all utilities,' this strongly indicates building-wide included cable service. The few unchecked cases are likely agent omission rather than a real difference in services.

About half of the MLS entries explicitly show common-area electricity included in the association fee (7/14 with OTCOEX). Given that this is a condo-hotel with 24-hour security and shared facilities, common power is necessarily paid from the maintenance fees. The inconsistent checkbox usage likely reflects agent variability, not an actual fee difference.

No agents indicate co-op taxes are included in fees, and the property is consistently described as a condominium/condo-hotel, not a cooperative. There is no textual or MLS evidence of cooperative tax structures here. Maintenance fees therefore do not include co-op taxes.

Electricity inclusion is strongly supported by both the MLS checkboxes (13/14 with ELECTR) and repeated remarks that the maintenance fee covers all utilities. This language is used across multiple separate listings, indicating a building-wide policy rather than a copy-paste error. Buyers can reasonably expect electricity to be included in the HOA fee.

No MLS records indicate gas is part of the association fee, and remarks never mention gas service. Given local norms and the lack of any gas-related description, it is very likely that there is no building gas utility included in maintenance fees. The 'all utilities' wording in remarks is best interpreted as electric, water, and similar services, not gas.

Most MLS entries show hot water included in the fees (10/14 with HOTWAT), and no listing indicates individual water heaters that would be separately metered. Combined with 'all utilities' language, this points to a central hot-water system funded by the maintenance fee. The few unchecked cases are likely data-entry inconsistencies.

Internet service appears in the association-fee-includes field in the strong majority of listings (11/14). In a hotel-managed building with Outrigger services and 'all utilities' covered, bundled internet is consistent with typical operations. The small number of listings without this box checked are likely oversights.

There are no remarks or MLS indicators of any marina, boat slips, or related access being included in the fees. The property is marketed purely as a Waikiki condo-hotel near the beach and shopping, not as a marina community. Association fees therefore do not include marina-related costs.

Sewer is explicitly marked as included in the majority of MLS records (11/14). Given the repeated 'maintenance fee covers all utilities' phrasing, sewer service is very likely covered by the HOA. This is consistent with how urban Waikiki condo-hotels usually structure utility billing.

Water is almost universally indicated as included in the maintenance fee (13/14 MLS entries). The 'covers all utilities' language across several independent listings strongly supports that unit water usage is paid through the HOA. Buyers should expect water to be part of the standard maintenance charges.

None of the listings mention BBQ grills, a barbecue area, or similar outdoor cooking facilities. Given the complete absence in both remarks and amenity checkboxes, this building is treated as not having BBQ amenities.

MLS data for all reviewed listings (0/14) show no bike storage amenity checked, and the remarks never mention bicycle storage, bike rooms, or racks. Other shared amenities are repeatedly described, so this consistent omission is strong evidence that dedicated bike storage is not provided at this building.

Listings emphasize proximity to white sand beaches and shopping rather than any boating facilities. With no mention of a dock or marina in remarks or MLS, the building is considered not to offer boat-dock access.

Listings specify paid parking arrangements but do not reference any car wash station or vehicle wash facility. With MLS data also omitting this feature, a car wash is considered not available in this building.

Listings describe the property as a boutique-style condo/hotel but do not mention any shared clubhouse or community building. The MLS amenity checkboxes for clubhouse are uniformly unchecked, so this feature is considered not present.

Several listings mention "front desk services," "front desk staff," and a hotel program that "takes care of everything," clearly indicating concierge-style front-desk service. With multiple agents and 4 MLS entries marking concierge, there is strong, building-wide evidence for concierge services when units participate in the Outrigger program.

Pets or pet-specific facilities are never discussed in the provided text. The absence of any dog-park amenity in MLS entries further supports that the building does not offer a dedicated dog park or pet run.

None of the listings describe a doorman or lobby attendant, and MLS data does not list a doorman amenity. Staff references are consistently to Outrigger’s front desk operations rather than a dedicated door attendant at the building entrance.

Across all provided remarks, there is no reference to a gym, fitness center, or exercise room in the building or as a shared on-site amenity. MLS checkbox data also uniformly omits this feature, indicating the building does not offer it.

The marketing focuses on legal short-term rentals, Outrigger management, and nearby attractions, with no reference to any building-provided transportation or chauffeured services. MLS amenity checkboxes likewise do not include limo service, so it is treated as absent.

Remarks focus on the units, lanai space, and proximity to Waikiki attractions rather than any on-site meeting or conference space. The MLS data also does not show a meeting-room amenity, indicating it does not exist in this building.

Many listings mention lanais, including 'private lanai', 'large covered lanai', and 'huge lanai', showing that units feature patio/deck-type outdoor spaces. This appears across multiple units and agents, so buyers can expect balcony/lanai-style patios in this building.

While the location near Waikiki and beaches is emphasized, there is no suggestion of dedicated on-site jogging or walking trails. The lack of this amenity in MLS data confirms it should not be listed as a building feature.

The building is marketed as a boutique condo-hotel and vacation property, with no references to kids’ play structures or tot lots. MLS amenity data also omits any playground feature, so it is considered absent.

Across all remarks, outdoor space is consistently described only as a lanai/balcony, with no reference to any yard or enclosed ground-level outdoor area. Combined with the urban high-rise context and MLS data, this strongly indicates there is no private yard amenity.

None of the marketing remarks suggest any on-site golf-related amenities. With no support from MLS checkboxes, a putting green is not considered part of this building’s offerings.

The only outdoor spaces mentioned are private lanais attached to units, not shared recreation decks. MLS data likewise does not indicate any recreation-area amenity for the building.

There is no indication of any dedicated recreation or game room within the building in the remarks. The lack of MLS checkbox selections for this amenity supports that the building does not have a recreation room.

The text consistently frames restaurants as nearby attractions, not as amenities located within Regency on Beachwalk itself. Given the explicit focus on location and the statement that the building has no pool and limited amenities, plus inconsistent MLS checkboxes, this building is treated as not having its own restaurant.

Multiple listings highlight large private lanais but never reference a shared rooftop terrace or roof deck. With no supporting MLS or remarks evidence, the building is treated as not having rooftop amenities.

Amenities discussed are limited to Outrigger-managed services and access to the Outrigger swimming pool for some units, with no sauna mentioned. The complete absence in MLS amenity checkboxes supports treating sauna as not available.

No listings (0/14) flag storage or additional storage in the MLS data, and none of the remarks reference storage units, lockers, or extra storage space. Agents consistently highlight other amenities (Outrigger pool access, front desk, parking) but never mention storage, suggesting the building does not provide dedicated storage units. Given the breadth of listings reviewed, it is very likely this feature is absent.

The public remarks describe the building’s location, security, rental program, parking, lanais, and access to a nearby hotel pool, but provide no indication of any surfboard storage facilities. I specifically looked for terms like 'surfboard storage', 'board storage', 'surf storage', and 'bike and surfboard storage' and found none, so this feature is assumed not present in the available data.

Listings focus on location and unit features, with no mention of tennis courts or tennis facilities. The MLS data also does not show tennis as a building amenity, so this feature is considered absent.

Although the remarks do not explicitly mention a trash or garbage chute, multiple MLS entries mark this amenity, and there is no indication it is absent. Given the building’s high-rise condo-hotel configuration and partial MLS support, it is reasonably inferred that a trash chute is available.

Parking is described purely in terms of nightly fees for owners and guests, with no references to valet, valet parking, or valet service. Given the consistent omission across many listings and MLS, the building does not appear to offer valet.

Listings focus on the central urban location and easy street access, with no references to gates, fencing, or perimeter walls. MLS data likewise never flags gated or walled features, indicating the property is not enclosed by a wall or fence.

One listing explicitly says “the building has no pool,” and others clarify that pool use is at the nearby Outrigger Reef Waikiki Beach Resort, not on-site. There is no mention of a whirlpool, jacuzzi, or spa in the building, so this feature is considered not present.

Multiple listings mention 'access to the Outrigger swimming pool' or 'use of the amenities at the Outrigger Reef Hotel' when units are in the Outrigger rental program, but this pool is off-site. One listing clearly states, 'Although the building has no pool,' confirming there is no pool amenity at Regency on Beachwalk itself. Given 0/14 MLS pool checkboxes and explicit remarks, the building should be treated as having no pool.

Since the building is confirmed to have no on-site pool, it necessarily cannot have a heated pool. All references are to an external hotel pool via Outrigger, with no indication that it is a building feature or that it is heated.

The public remarks refer to access to an Outrigger swimming pool and the pool at Outrigger Reef Waikiki Beach Resort but never specify that any pool is salt water. I searched for terms like 'salt water pool', 'saltwater pool', 'salt pool', and 'saline pool' and found no matches. Based on the absence of any such description, the pool_salt feature is set to false with medium confidence.

None of the 14 listings mention in‑unit washers or dryers, and the MLS washer/dryer inclusion is never checked. Given this consistent absence across many units and agents, it is very likely that this building does not typically offer in‑unit laundry.

MLS amenities data for 11 out of 14 listings indicate community laundry, and no listing text states that laundry is absent. The strong consistency of the COMLAU checkbox across multiple listings and agents supports the presence of shared/community laundry facilities in the building.

The remarks were checked for any indication that shared laundry requires payment (coin or card), but nothing related to paid community laundry was mentioned. Since this is usually highlighted when present, the absence of such references suggests there is no paid community laundry setup described in these listings.

All provided public remarks were reviewed for phrases like 'laundry on each floor', 'laundry room on every floor', or 'floor-by-floor laundry' and none were present. Because such a convenience is typically advertised if available, this suggests the building does not offer community laundry on every floor.

Multiple listings (3/14) describe paid parking available to both owners and guests with specific nightly rates, such as 'Parking is available at $15 per night for owners and $39 per night for guests' and '$20 per night for owners and $39 per night for guests if the unit is in the Outrigger rental program.' Despite MLS checkboxes showing 'NONE', the consistent mention of paid parking access across different remarks shows that buyers can expect parking options connected to this building.

Across all remarks there is no mention of 'assigned' or 'deeded' parking; parking is only described as nightly paid parking linked to the Outrigger program. This pattern indicates hotel-style shared parking access rather than individually assigned stalls for units in this building.

Agent remarks reference paid parking but never describe it as covered or in a garage, and MLS data does not show any covered or garage parking features. Given the absence of any explicit reference to a building-owned covered facility, covered parking is unlikely to be a building amenity here.

Remarks consistently describe parking as a nightly-paid amenity for both owners and guests, which is typical of condo-hotel operations rather than deeded parking. No phrases like 'deeded parking', 'owned stall', or 'parking included in deed' appear, so parking is very likely not deeded.

Neither the detailed parking descriptions nor any other remarks mention EV charging stations, and MLS parking features never list EVCHRG. This strongly suggests that EV charging is not currently offered as part of the building’s parking options.

The listings confirm that parking is available on a nightly paid basis but do not specify any monthly parking charge. Since the feature tracks a monthly fee, it cannot be determined from the provided per-night rates.

At least 3 listings specify 'Guest parking is $39 per night' alongside separate owner rates, explicitly marketing guest parking availability. This consistent, rate-specific wording across different remarks provides strong evidence that guest parking is an offered amenity for this building’s units.

Neither the agents’ descriptions nor MLS data reference any form of secured or gated parking entry for this condo building. In the absence of any mention of secure access, it is unlikely that secured-entry parking is a defined building amenity here.

Across all listings there are no references to 'tandem' parking or back-to-back stall configurations, and MLS data does not flag TANDEM for any unit. This strongly indicates that tandem parking is not a feature of the building’s parking arrangements.

Listings describe paid parking via Outrigger but never characterize it as valet or attended service, and VALET is not selected in any MLS parking features. In the absence of explicit valet language, valet parking should not be treated as a confirmed building amenity.

There is no indication that parking is allocated via a waitlist; instead, parking is described as available for a nightly fee. In the absence of any references to a waitlist system, it is moderately likely that no formal parking waitlist exists.

No listing indicates keyed or fobbed elevator access, and MLS data never marks elevator security. Given the consistent omission across all remarks, there is insufficient evidence that the elevators are specially keyed or restricted.

Remarks describe the building as secured but never reference card or fob-based access (e.g., key card entry, fob access, electronic readers). Based on this absence and the generic nature of the security description, card access is marked as not present, but with only medium confidence.

Two listings explicitly call the building a "24hr secured" or "24-hr secured" building, implying staffed security rather than only key or camera access. Given the condo-hotel context and MLS security-guard checkboxes on some listings, the evidence points to a staffed security guard presence.

The remarks were checked for terms like 'security patrol', 'roving security', and 'patrolled building' and none were found. While the building is described as secured, there is no explicit evidence of a dedicated patrol service, so this feature is set to false with medium confidence.

No listing remarks reference cameras, CCTV, or video monitoring, and MLS data never flags a security system. Security is consistently described via staffed/24-hr security and hotel management, so there is no solid evidence of a dedicated video-surveillance system.

Across the remarks, there are no references to 'central AC', 'central air', or similar building-wide systems. Instead, units are described with split AC, and only 1/14 listings has a central AC checkbox marked, suggesting that was likely an agent error rather than a true building feature.

Split AC is clearly documented, with remarks for different units noting 'split AC'/'spilt AC' and 12/14 listings ticking the split AC inclusion. This consistent pattern across many listings and multiple agents strongly supports that the building’s units use split systems.

There are no references in any remarks to window or wall AC units, and the dedicated MLS window-AC checkbox is never used (0/14). Given that multiple listings emphasize split AC instead, it is very likely that window AC is not a feature of this building.

MLS data is unanimous (14/14 listings) that the building is concrete construction. Remarks focus on rentals and amenities and do not contradict this, which aligns with typical reinforced-concrete high-rise construction in Waikiki.

A majority of listings (8/14) tag double wall in the construction field, with the rest silent rather than contradictory. Although no remarks mention it, this pattern moderately supports the presence of double-wall construction elements.

There is no MLS or remarks evidence of hollow tile construction. All listings instead emphasize the condo-hotel character without any hollow-tile references.

0/14 listings list masonry/stucco construction and the public remarks are silent on stucco or masonry structure. This indicates the building is not classified in MLS as masonry-stucco construction.

No listings (0/14) tag steel frame construction, and all classify it as concrete instead. Remarks do not reference any steel-frame structure, so it is not treated as a steel-frame building in practice.

Some MLS records (2/14) identify a slab foundation and none identify an alternative foundation type in remarks. Combined with the typical construction of Waikiki concrete condo towers, this provides moderate support for a slab foundation.

No analysis available

0/14 listings indicate wood frame construction and no remarks mention wood framing. Given the building’s concrete high-rise character, wood-frame primary construction is very unlikely.

Above-ground construction is rarely used for this kind of urban condo-hotel, and only a minority of listings (3/14) check the ABOGRO box. With no remarks supporting an above-ground foundation, this is very likely not accurate for the building.

MLS data overwhelmingly does not support brick construction (1/14 vs 13/14 without BRICK). No remarks mention brick exteriors or brick construction, which is atypical for Waikiki condo towers.

No listings (0/14) indicate single-wall construction and remarks never reference it. Given the building’s concrete condo-hotel nature, single-wall construction can be ruled out.

Public remarks repeatedly confirm that legal short-term rentals are allowed in this building. Phrases like 'LEGAL SHORT TERM', 'allowing legal short term rentals', and 'Short term rentals OK' indicate STR is explicitly permitted.

The building clearly participates in a hotel-style rental pool, primarily through Outrigger. Multiple remarks describe units being in the 'Outrigger Hotel rental pool' or 'hotel rental program' and gaining hotel-type services through this arrangement.

Hotel pool participation is not mandatory in this building. Several listings explicitly state that owners can self-manage, terminate Outrigger, or only receive certain benefits 'if' they join the hotel rental program, confirming it is optional.

Among 14 listings, none are explicitly marked Fee Simple in the MLS tenure field and the remarks never mention 'fee simple' or equivalent terms. Because the MLS tenure data are blank for both FS and LH, tenure status is effectively unknown and this entry reflects a lack of evidence rather than a confirmed absence of Fee Simple units.

No listings are flagged as Leasehold in the MLS data, and no remarks mention lease terms, lease rent, or lease expiration dates. As with Fee Simple, the building’s true tenure structure is unclear from the available information and this setting reflects an absence of leasehold evidence, not a definitive exclusion.

The remarks focus on short-term rental legality, amenities, and location but do not state whether units are leasehold or fee simple, nor any ground lease end date. I searched for 'leasehold', 'lease expires', 'lease to', 'ground lease', and any 4-digit years in that context and found no relevant information, so the lease expiry year is unknown.

None of the public remarks across multiple listings state that the building or units are VA approved, nor do they mention VA loans being accepted. I searched for phrases like 'VA approved', 'VA financing', and 'VA loans' and found no matches, so it is likely not specifically marketed as VA-approved.

The remarks were reviewed for any language indicating comprehensive or walls-in HOA insurance coverage and none was found. Without explicit confirmation, the building is assumed not to be fully insured by the HOA for this field, with medium confidence.

Fire sprinklers are checked as an amenity for 12 of the 14 units in the MLS, with no listings indicating the absence of sprinklers or describing the building as unsprinklered. This consistent MLS pattern strongly supports that the building has a fire sprinkler system.

All remarks were checked for any indication that the building has passed a fire/life safety evaluation, but no such statements appear. In the absence of explicit confirmation, this field is set to false by default with medium confidence.

Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.

No analysis available

Several listings describe ocean outlooks, including phrases like 'Partial Ocean View', 'partial ocean views from the spacious lanai', and 'Ocean views and amazing location.' MLS data also shows 3 of 14 listings with OCEAN checked in the view field. This confirms that some units in the building offer ocean views even though one listing is marked NONE.

Across all provided remarks, there are no references to mountain or Koolau views, only ocean, city, and greenery. Current MLS data shows 0 of 14 listings with MOUNTAIN checked and one listing explicitly marked NONE. Given this consistent absence, it is very likely the building does not offer notable mountain-view units.

None of the listings mention Diamond Head, DH, or crater views, which are typically highlighted when present. MLS view data also shows 0 of 14 listings with DIAMOND HEAD checked and one listing marked NONE. This strongly suggests the building does not offer Diamond Head views.

Several units are marketed with city views, including phrases like 'city views from the lanai off the back bedroom', 'view of the city', and 'open view of combination of greens and city.' MLS data reinforces this, with CITY checked in 8 of 14 listings. City views are clearly a prominent feature for multiple stacks/floors.

Listings frequently emphasize how close the building is to Waikiki Beach and describe ocean views, and MLS data records COASTLINE as a view type for 1 of 14 units. This combination indicates that some units enjoy a broader shoreline/coastline outlook, not just a narrow ocean peek. Thus, coastline views are available in the building.

At least one mid-floor unit is marketed with a 'tree-top/park view', and another with an 'open view of combination of greens and city', showing that certain exposures look onto landscaped or park areas. MLS data also records GARDEN as a view for 1 of 14 current listings. Together this supports that the building offers garden/park-type views for some units.

A listing notes the building is 'close to ... Ala Wai Golf course' but does not describe any golf course outlook from units. MLS data likewise has 0 of 14 listings with GOLF COURSE checked and one marked NONE. This indicates the building does not provide golf course views, just proximity to the course.

The marketing consistently focuses on ocean, city, and proximity to Waikiki Beach and shopping, without any references to Ala Wai Harbor, a marina, or canal views. MLS view data also shows 0 of 14 listings with MARINA/CANAL selected and one marked NONE. This pattern makes it very likely that the building does not offer marina views.

Across all the marketing remarks, views are described in terms of ocean, city, and greenery, with no mention of sunrise or morning-sun exposure. MLS view data also shows no listings with SUNRISE checked. Given these consistent omissions, it is very likely the building is not promoted as offering sunrise views.

The narrative remarks focus on other views, but structured MLS data shows SUNSET selected for 1 of 14 listings. This suggests at least one stack/floor has a westerly exposure suitable for sunset viewing. Buyers seeking sunset views could therefore find an appropriate unit in this building.

Marketing materials highlight beaches, shopping, dining, city, and greenery, with no references to a cemetery or similar nearby landmark. MLS view fields also show no listings with CEMETERY selected and one listing marked NONE. This strongly supports that cemetery views are not a feature of this property.

Several listings describe different types of views but none mention watching Friday night or other fireworks from the units or lanais. I specifically looked for 'fireworks', 'Friday night show', or similar phrases and found no evidence of fireworks views.

No analysis available

There is no explicit 'no pets' language in any remarks and the MLS restriction code for no pets (NOPET) is not used on any listing. This implies the building does not have a blanket pet ban, so pets are likely allowed in some form.

None of the 14 MLS entries mark a resident manager amenity, and the remarks consistently describe security and services in terms of 24‑hr security and Outrigger hotel management rather than an on-site manager. This consistent absence strongly indicates that the building does not have a resident manager.

Multiple agents explicitly describe the building as a condo-hotel/condotel with participation in the Outrigger hotel rental pool and hotel-style services. Combined with the MLS architectural_style=CONDOT on most listings, this firmly establishes it as a condotel.

All data and wording align with fee simple/condominium-style ownership in a condo-hotel, not a cooperative. The absence of any co-op indicators in MLS or remarks strongly supports that this is not a co-op building.