Rainbow Place
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Rainbow Place
Building Overview
Rainbow Place in McCully-Moiliili (built 1976); pets allowed, short-term rentals not permitted.
About Rainbow Place
Rainbow Place is a residential building located in the McCully-Moiliili neighborhood, built in 1976. According to available records, specific details about the building’s size (number of units/floors) and construction type are not specified in the MLS data.
Key policies noted in the MLS data include that pets are allowed and short-term rentals are not permitted. The management company is listed as Unknown in the available records. No additional amenity or common-area information is provided in the MLS-derived data.
Parking, maintenance fees, on-site management, and other operational details are not specified in the MLS information provided. Based on MLS data, buyers and agents should verify unit counts, construction details, parking arrangements, fees, and management contacts with the listing broker or property records before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for numeric owner-occupancy information and phrases indicating a high owner-occupied ratio, such as "80% owner occupied" or "majority owner occupied." The remarks do not provide any such statistic or clear qualitative statement. As a result, owner occupancy cannot be determined from the text.
I searched the remarks for explicit counts such as "4 elevators," "four elevators," or "multiple elevators." The only elevator-related language was a directional reference near the elevator, which does not establish the number of elevators. Because there is no count in the remarks, the elevator total remains unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence is moderate: 11 of 14 current MLS listings include OTCOEX, but public remarks mostly use broader language like 'common expenses' rather than explicitly naming hallway/elevator electricity. Because the MLS checkbox appears in a majority of listings, this is likely a real building-level inclusion, though the remark support is weaker than for the utility items.
No analysis available
This feature is strongly confirmed by both MLS and remarks. All 14 current listings include ELECTR, and the remarks repeatedly state 'maintenance fees cover electricity' or 'Electricity is also included in the maintenance fee,' showing consistent building-level support across multiple listings and agents.
No analysis available
Strong evidence supports hot water being included. Thirteen of 14 MLS listings mark HOTWAT, no listings show WTRHTR, and several remarks directly say 'hot water' is included or the fee is 'all-inclusive' with hot water, indicating this is a genuine building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer inclusion is consistently confirmed. All 14 current MLS listings include SEWER, and multiple remarks say 'maintenance fees cover electricity, water, and sewer' or 'include electricity, water, and sewer,' so this is highly reliable.
Water inclusion is fully supported. All 14 current MLS listings include WATER, and remarks repeatedly state 'maintenance fees cover ... water' or 'include electricity, water, and sewer,' making this a very strong building-level feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Car wash facilities are clearly present for this building. Public remarks explicitly mention a 'convenient on-site car wash area' and 'A car wash area located next to the parking stall,' while MLS data shows CRWSH in 11 of 14 listings. The repeated mention across multiple listings plus the strong historical MLS signal makes this a high-confidence building amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
This feature is strongly supported across the listings: 14/14 current MLS entries include washer/dryer, and numerous remarks explicitly mention 'in-unit washer/dryer' or 'washer and dryer in-unit.' The repeated phrasing across multiple listings suggests this is a real building feature, not a copy/paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Assigned parking is strongly supported across the listings. Multiple remarks explicitly say "assigned covered parking stall (#114)", "assigned parking stall," "assigned parking," and "1 assigned covered parking stall," which matches the high-confidence MLS pattern. This appears consistent across multiple agents rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
Covered parking is clearly present in the building. Remarks include phrases like "assigned covered parking stall (#114)," "covered parking near the gated entry," "gated, covered parking close to the lobby entrance," and "two covered parking stalls." The evidence is consistent across many listings and aligns with the high-confidence MLS parking features.
I looked for wording like deeded parking, owned stall, or parking included in deed. The listings consistently describe assigned/covered parking, but that is not enough to confirm the stall is deeded, so this remains unconfirmed and is treated as false absent explicit evidence.
No analysis available
I searched for parking fee, monthly parking charge, additional parking cost, and parking rental language. The remarks only mention assigned, covered, or secured parking, with no fee stated, so the amount is unknown.
No analysis available
Good corroboration: MLS shows 9/13 with secured-entry checked and remarks repeatedly state 'secured building', 'gated entry', and 'gated, secured parking' (e.g., 'secured building offers gated entry and secured parking', 'gated parking near the elevator'), indicating the building provides secured-entry parking.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for references to parking waitlists, waiting lists, or joining a list for parking. The remarks instead describe parking as assigned or included, with no indication of a waitlist system.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Concrete construction is strongly supported by the MLS data: 13 of 14 listings list CONCRE as a construction material. None of the public remarks explicitly say “concrete,” but the consistency across many listings suggests this is a true building feature rather than a one-off agent entry.
Double wall construction is supported by the MLS checkbox data, with 10 of 14 listings marked DOUWAL. The public remarks do not spell out “double wall” or similar phrasing, so this appears to come from MLS data rather than listing-copy language, but the frequency is still strong enough to include.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for short-term rental terms such as STR permitted, vacation rental allowed, NUC, TVU, or minimum-night rules. Nothing in the public remarks supports STR availability, so this is treated as not allowed based on the available evidence.
I searched for hotel pool, hotel rental program, managed-by-hotel, and brand-pool references such as Hilton or Ritz pool. None were found, and because there is no evidence STR is allowed, this feature is set to false.
I looked for language indicating mandatory participation in a rental pool, such as required to rent or cannot opt out. There were no such references, and without evidence of STR or a hotel program, this is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for leasehold language such as lease expiration, ground lease end dates, renewal years, and leasehold terminology. Instead, the remarks explicitly identify the property as fee-simple, so there is no lease expiry year to extract.
The listings directly indicate VA financing eligibility. Multiple remarks reference VA assumption eligibility and one explicitly calls the complex VA approved, which is strong public evidence for this feature.
The public remarks directly say the building is fully insured, including "100% hurricane coverage." That is strong, explicit evidence of full building insurance/walls-in style coverage. This is a high-confidence true value.
No analysis available
I looked for phrases like fire/life safety evaluation passed, FLSE passed, fire safety certified, life safety compliant, or passed fire inspection. The remarks mention a new fire alarm system, but that is not the same as a stated passing evaluation. With no explicit pass language, I cannot mark this as true.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Mountain views are repeatedly confirmed across many listings, with several remarks using phrases like 'Manoa mountain views' and 'beautiful city and mountain views.' This appears consistent across multiple agents rather than a one-off copy-paste. Strong evidence supports that the building offers mountain-view units.
Diamond Head views are clearly documented in multiple listings, including language such as 'stunning Diamond Head views,' 'majestic backdrop of Diamond Head,' and 'breathtaking views of Diamond Head.' The repetition across several listings strongly indicates these are real building view options, not MLS noise. This feature should be included.
City views are consistently mentioned across multiple listings, with phrases like 'beautiful city views,' 'views of the city and Diamond Head,' and 'expansive city and mountain views.' The evidence is strong and repeated by different remarks, supporting that the building offers city-view units. This aligns with the previously high-confidence MLS pattern.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is some MLS evidence that sunrise-related views/exposure may exist in the building, but the public remarks provided do not clearly confirm it. Because the checkbox appears in a minority of listings and the remarks are silent, confidence is only moderate. This should be treated as possible but not strongly verified from remarks alone.
No analysis available
Cemetery-view exposure appears in a substantial portion of the MLS records, but none of the supplied remarks explicitly say 'cemetery view' or similar. That makes the evidence plausible but still somewhat dependent on MLS checkbox data that could include agent copy/paste. Moderate confidence is warranted until remarks confirm it directly.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Resident manager is strongly supported by the MLS amenity data: 13 of 14 current listings mark RESMAN. None of the public remarks explicitly mention a resident/live-in manager, so this appears to come primarily from consistent MLS reporting rather than agent descriptions. Given the high repetition across recent listings, this is likely a real building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.