Rainbow Place
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Rainbow Place
Building Overview
Rainbow Place in McCully-Moiliili (built 1976); pets allowed, short-term rentals not permitted.
About Rainbow Place
Rainbow Place is a residential building located in the McCully-Moiliili neighborhood, built in 1976. According to available records, specific details about the building’s size (number of units/floors) and construction type are not specified in the MLS data.
Key policies noted in the MLS data include that pets are allowed and short-term rentals are not permitted. The management company is listed as Unknown in the available records. No additional amenity or common-area information is provided in the MLS-derived data.
Parking, maintenance fees, on-site management, and other operational details are not specified in the MLS information provided. Based on MLS data, buyers and agents should verify unit counts, construction details, parking arrangements, fees, and management contacts with the listing broker or property records before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for numeric occupancy figures and descriptive phrases like "80% owner occupied" or "majority owner occupied." No such information appears in the public remarks, so the owner-occupancy rate cannot be determined from this data.
I searched for direct statements like "4 elevators," "four elevators," or "multiple elevators," but the remarks only mention being "near the elevator" and describe the building as a high-rise. That suggests an elevator exists, but there is no evidence to determine the number.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence is moderate rather than explicit: 12 of 15 MLS listings include OTCOEX, and multiple remarks mention maintenance fees covering "common expenses." The language is fairly consistent across listings, but it appears more like standard copied HOA wording than a direct statement about common area electricity specifically.
No analysis available
This feature is consistently confirmed across the building: 15 of 15 MLS listings include ELECTR. Public remarks repeatedly and directly say the maintenance fee covers electricity, making this a very high-confidence building-level inclusion.
No analysis available
Hot water is strongly supported by the MLS and the remarks. Fourteen of 15 listings include HOTWAT, none show WTRHTR, and several descriptions explicitly list hot water among the covered maintenance items.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer inclusion is confirmed across the entire set of listings. All 15 current MLS records include SEWER, and the public remarks repeatedly reinforce that maintenance fees cover sewer.
Water inclusion is very well supported. All 15 current MLS listings include WATER, and the remarks consistently state that maintenance fees cover water, indicating a building-wide feature rather than a one-off agent error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Car wash facilities are strongly confirmed for Rainbow Place. Multiple listings explicitly mention an "on-site car wash area" or a car wash area next to parking, showing consistent evidence across several remarks rather than a one-off MLS checkbox.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Trash chute appears likely to be a building amenity based on 12 of 15 listings checking TRACHU, but none of the supplied public remarks explicitly mention a trash, garbage, or refuse chute. This looks like moderately strong MLS checkbox evidence, though it may still reflect copy-paste rather than independently verified remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
In-unit laundry is strongly supported by the data. Multiple listings explicitly say "in-unit washer/dryer" or "dedicated in-unit washer and dryer," and the current MLS data shows 15/15 listings including washer/dryer. The evidence is consistent across several remarks and appears to be stable rather than copy-paste noise.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Assigned parking is very strongly supported across the listings. Multiple remarks explicitly say "assigned covered parking stall (#114)", "1 assigned covered parking stall is included," and "assigned parking stall," which suggests this is a consistent building feature rather than a one-off. The current MLS pattern (13/15 with ASSIGN) aligns with the remarks and looks reliable across multiple agents.
Covered parking is clearly present in the building. At least several listings directly mention "covered parking," "assigned covered parking stall," and "2 covered parking stalls," making this a strong building-level feature. The MLS history (14/15 with covered parking indicators) reinforces that this is not just copy-paste noise.
I searched for deeded, owned, or parking-in-deed language and did not find it. The listings consistently describe parking as assigned, covered, or included, which suggests it is not deeded based on the public remarks.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit parking fee language such as monthly parking rent, additional parking cost, or stall rental. The remarks only describe parking as assigned, covered, or included, so no fee can be confirmed.
No analysis available
Secured-entry parking is well corroborated. Multiple listings describe the building as "secured," with "gated entry," "secured, gated parking," and "gated, covered parking," indicating controlled access rather than open parking. The MLS pattern and remarks together provide strong confirmation from multiple sources.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for references to a parking waitlist or joining a waiting list for stalls. Nothing like that appears in the remarks, and the listings imply parking is assigned rather than waitlisted.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Concrete construction is strongly supported by the MLS data: 14 of 15 listings show CONCRE. The public remarks do not explicitly say “concrete,” but there is no contradiction, and the repeated MLS pattern suggests a building-level fact rather than a one-off agent note.
Double wall construction is supported mainly by the MLS checkbox data: 11 of 15 listings have DOUWAL. The public remarks do not explicitly mention double-wall construction, which suggests the checkbox data is carrying most of the evidence rather than remark text.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Slab construction is not well supported here. Only 5 of 15 listings have SLAB in MLS, and none of the provided public remarks mention a concrete slab or solid foundation, so this remains uncertain.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for STR terms such as short-term rental allowed, vacation rental, NUC, TVU, or minimum-night rules. None were found in the public remarks, so there is no evidence that STR is allowed.
I looked for hotel pool or branded rental program references such as Hilton, Ritz, or hotel-managed operations. None were found, and because STR is not supported by the remarks, this must be false.
I searched for statements that owners must participate in a rental pool or cannot opt out. The remarks contain no such language, and there is no evidence of any mandatory hotel pool arrangement.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for leasehold terms such as lease expiration year, ground lease end date, renewal, or leasehold language. None were found, and the remarks point to fee-simple ownership instead, so there is no lease expiry year to extract.
The public remarks directly support VA financing eligibility. Multiple listings reference VA assumption eligibility and one explicitly says the complex is VA approved.
The remarks directly and clearly confirm full building insurance coverage. The wording is explicit enough to support a high-confidence true value.
No analysis available
I looked for phrases such as fire/life safety evaluation passed, FLSE passed, fire safety certified, life safety compliant, or passed fire inspection. None were found; the only related note is an upgraded fire alarm system, which is not the same as a pass status.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Mountain views are strongly and repeatedly confirmed across many listings. The remarks use consistent language such as 'Manoa mountain views,' 'views of the mountains,' and 'beautiful city and mountain views,' which suggests this is a real building-level offering rather than a copy-paste anomaly.
Diamond Head views are clearly and consistently confirmed by multiple listings and multiple agents. The language is very specific and vivid, indicating genuine Diamond Head-facing units in the building.
City views appear to be a standard and broadly available feature in the building. The remarks consistently confirm city-facing exposure alongside other views, and the MLS data is unanimous.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is only weak indirect MLS support for sunrise-related exposure, and the public remarks do not substantiate it. The available text centers on other view types, so sunrise is not reliably confirmed.
No analysis available
Cemetery-view exposure is not confirmed in the remarks. The MLS data suggests some records may reference it, but the lack of any explicit public-description support makes this feature too uncertain to validate.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Resident manager is strongly supported for Rainbow Place. Historical MLS data shows 14 of 15 listings include RESMAN, and one public remark explicitly says the building has a 'Resident Manager.' The repeated amenity checkbox data and the direct remark together make this a very strong building-level feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.