Puu Heleakala
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Puu Heleakala
Building Overview
Puu Heleakala in Nanakuli-Maili (built 1974) with mountain and sunset views; resident manager on site.
About Puu Heleakala
Puu Heleakala is a condominium property located in the Nanakuli-Maili neighborhood, built in 1974. According to available records, the building is constructed of concrete, steel frame, and wood frame. Unit count and building size are not provided in the MLS data available.
Key features noted in the MLS data include mountain and sunset views and an on-site resident manager. The property does not allow pets and short-term rentals are not permitted, according to the provided information.
Additional details from the MLS indicate assigned parking is available. The management company is listed as unknown in the records. Based on MLS data analysis; buyers should verify all building details, rules, and fees with the listing agent or managing entity before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for owner-occupancy indicators such as percentage statements like "80% owner occupied," or qualitative phrasing like "majority owner occupied" or "highly owner occupied." None of the remarks included any owner-occupancy information, so there is no basis to assign a percentage.
I searched the public remarks for explicit elevator references such as "elevator," "elevators," "multiple elevators," or a specific count, but found none. The listings describe townhomes with stairs, garages, patios, and parking stalls, which does not provide evidence of any building elevator count.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is some support for common-area electricity being included, with 9 of 20 current MLS records checking OTCOEX. However, none of the public remarks explicitly call out common electric/common area electricity, so this looks more like mixed MLS checkbox evidence than repeated remark confirmation.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Hot water is strongly supported as not included: 0 of 20 current MLS records list HOTWAT, and many listings instead mention water heaters, including phrases like 'new water heater' and 'brand new 50 Gallon water heater just installed.' The WTRHTR pattern across multiple listings is consistent and strongly argues against building-supplied hot water being part of the fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer inclusion is very strongly confirmed. Sixteen of twenty current MLS records include SEWER, and several remarks explicitly say things like 'Monthly fees cover water, & sewer' and 'maint/ fees include water/sewer bill.' The repeated language across multiple listings makes this a high-confidence building feature.
Water inclusion is confirmed across both MLS and public remarks. Eighteen of twenty current MLS records include WATER, and multiple listings explicitly mention 'Monthly fees cover water' or 'water/sewer bill.' This is one of the clearest building-wide fee inclusions in the dataset.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence confirms patio/deck access in Puu Heleakala. Across the remarks, well over a dozen listings mention phrases like “BIG COVERED PATIO,” “covered patio,” “lanai,” “large front and back patios,” and “private lanai,” showing this is a recurring building feature rather than a one-off copy/paste error.
No remarks across the provided listings reference a "jogging path", "walking path", or similar; zero listings mention trails or fitness paths. Given absent remark evidence and only a single MLS checkbox occurrence (1/20), this appears to be an agent entry error rather than a true building feature.
No analysis available
Strong evidence supports private yard availability at Puu Heleakala. Many remarks explicitly mention “fenced backyard,” “private backyard,” “private yard,” “private enclosed yard,” and “fenced in courtyard,” with multiple listings also describing front/back yard space, indicating this feature is broadly associated with the building.
No analysis available
Strong, repeated evidence that Pu'u Heleakala has a shared recreation area. Current remarks across many listings mention a "recreation center with pavilion," playground, basketball court, and open fields/green spaces, with at least 15+ listings referencing the amenity in similar terms. The consistency across multiple agents suggests this is a real common-area feature, not just copy-paste checkbox noise.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage is supported by multiple public remarks across the building, not just MLS checkboxes. At least 4 listings explicitly reference storage-related space, including "storage closet and shelving within the garage," "front entry area ideal for storage," "back storage area," and "pantry storage." The evidence appears consistent across multiple agents rather than a single copy-paste source, so the feature should remain included.
The remarks reference nearby beaches and surfing lifestyle but do not mention any dedicated surfboard or board storage areas in the building or complex. I specifically searched for terms like 'surfboard storage', 'board storage', 'surf storage', and similar phrases and found no evidence. Given this absence, it is moderately likely that there is no dedicated surfboard storage facility.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across dozens of listings, remarks consistently describe the Puu Heleakala recreation center as having a pavilion, playground, basketball court, and open fields, with no mention of a pool. Only 1 of 20 MLS entries has a pool-related amenity box checked, which conflicts with all narrative descriptions. This strongly suggests the building does not have a pool and that the isolated MLS pool entry is mistaken.
No analysis available
I searched all remarks for terms like 'salt water pool', 'saltwater pool', 'salt pool', or 'saline pool' and found no references. Listings describe a recreation center and outdoor amenities without mentioning any swimming pool, suggesting there is no salt water pool. Based on this absence, the building is assumed not to have a salt water pool.
In-unit laundry is supported by both MLS inclusions and public remarks. Multiple listings explicitly say "new washer/dryer," "in unit laundry," and "washer and dryer," indicating this is a real building feature rather than a copy-paste error. The evidence is consistent across several remarks and aligns with the current MLS data.
No analysis available
There are no references to coin-op, card-op, or fee-based community laundry in any listing remarks. Mentions of in-unit laundry suggest residents are not relying on a paid shared laundry facility.
No listing remarks mention community laundry on every floor or any shared laundry rooms. The properties are described as townhomes with in-unit or private laundry, which makes a floor-by-floor community laundry setup unlikely.
Parking is clearly a building-level feature. Across the provided remarks, dozens of listings mention parking, including phrases like "two assigned parking stalls," "2 open parking stalls," "2 parking stalls," and "carport-garage." The evidence is consistent across multiple listings and appears to be broad building-level information rather than a one-off agent error.
Assigned parking is strongly supported at the building level. Numerous listings mention "two assigned parking stalls," "2 assigned parking spaces," "two side-by-side assigned parking stalls," and "deeded with TWO parking spaces." This is consistent across many listings and multiple agents, so it does not look like copy-paste checkbox noise.
No analysis available
At least one listing explicitly says the unit is deeded with two parking spaces, which is direct evidence that parking is deeded. Other remarks reinforce that the parking is tied to the unit rather than rented separately.
No analysis available
I searched the public remarks for parking fee language such as monthly parking charge, rental parking, or additional cost. The listings repeatedly mention assigned parking stalls, garages, or open parking, but none state a separate monthly fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for explicit references to a parking waitlist, parking waiting list, or instructions to join a waitlist for parking. The remarks discuss parking availability and assigned stalls, but there is no evidence of a waitlist process.
No analysis available
Listings reference items like a 'new security front door' and fenced or gated yards, but these are individual-unit features, not a building-wide card/fob system. I searched for terms such as key card, fob access, card reader, and electronic entry and found no evidence of a card-based access system, so this feature is likely not present.
No analysis available
The remarks describe community amenities (recreation center, playground, basketball court, parks) and a resident manager, but do not reference any security patrol service. I specifically looked for phrases like security patrol, roving security, and patrolled complex and found no evidence, so this feature is likely not present.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Window AC is explicitly mentioned in 1 listing: "owners added 5 window AC's." Another listing mentions an "AC split system," which supports that air conditioning is present in some units, but it is not window-specific. Overall the evidence is limited but direct, and the MLS checkbox appears in only 1 of 20 listings, so this looks like a feature present in some units rather than a broadly copied building standard.
Current MLS construction_materials list CONCRE for 6/20 units, suggesting some or all buildings incorporate concrete construction even though remarks do not discuss structure type.
Double wall construction is strongly supported by the MLS history for this building. The data shows DOUWAL in 15 of 20 current listings, with earlier records also frequently showing the same code, and there are no public remarks indicating a change away from that construction type. Because this is a building-level feature buyers care about, it should be included with very high confidence.
MLS construction_materials includes HOLTIL (hollow tile) in 3 of 20 current listings; prior data also flagged hollow tile. However, none of the public remarks mention 'hollow tile' or 'hollow tile construction', so supporting evidence is limited and may reflect inconsistent agent checkbox usage rather than explicit description in remarks. Given prior MLS indications but lack of explicit remarks, flag the building as having hollow tile construction with moderate confidence.
No analysis available
Across 20 recent listings in this building, 8 include “STEFRA” (steel frame) in the MLS construction_materials data. Although none of the public remarks explicitly say “steel frame,” agents consistently checking this box on a significant minority of listings implies the townhomes incorporate steel-frame construction. Because materials fields are often underreported, this recurring pattern is treated as moderate evidence that steel framing is present.
Concrete slab construction appears only in a minority of MLS records, with about 5 of 20 listings showing SLAB. There are no remark-based confirmations of a slab foundation, so this looks like weak-to-moderate MLS evidence rather than a well-verified feature.
No analysis available
3/20 MLS records list WOOFRA in construction_materials and none explicitly contradict wood framing in remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for short-term rental indicators including STR permitted, legal vacation rental, NUC, TVU, hotel pool language, and any mention of 30-day minimums or owner-occupant-only rules. None were found in the public remarks, so there is no evidence that short-term rentals are allowed.
I looked for hotel pool terms such as hotel rental pool, managed by hotel, Hilton/Trump/Ritz pool, or similar branded rental programs. There were no such mentions, and because STR is not evidenced here, hotel pool participation cannot be supported.
I searched for language indicating a mandatory hotel pool or required rental-program participation, including terms like must participate, cannot opt out, or mandatory pool. No such remarks were present, and there is no evidence of any rental pool program at all.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The listings identify the property as leasehold and give a specific end year of 2050. That matches the requested lease-expiry extraction.
The public remarks directly state that the building is VA approved, which supports VA financing eligibility. This is explicit and current enough to treat as true.
The remarks directly state that the building has "100% hurricane insurance coverage," which strongly supports full HOA building insurance / walls-in coverage. This is the clearest and most reliable feature match in the remarks.
No analysis available
I looked for language indicating a passed fire/life safety evaluation, FLSE compliance, fire inspection approval, or fire safety certification, and found nothing in the remarks. With no positive mention and no current verified value, this is best treated as not evidenced in the listings.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Mountain views are strongly supported for Puu Heleakala. Across the provided remarks, at least 3 listings explicitly mention them with phrases like 'amazing mountain range,' 'peaceful mountain side privacy,' and 'views of the majestic Waianae mountain range.' This appears to be consistent across multiple agents rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sunset views are clearly supported for Puu Heleakala. At least 4 listings explicitly reference sunset views or equivalent wording, including 'Enjoy breathtaking sunsets,' 'magical sunsets each night,' and 'amazing mountain and sunset views.' The repeated phrasing across multiple listings suggests this is a real building feature, not just MLS copy-paste noise.
No analysis available
None of the public remarks mention being able to watch Friday night or any fireworks from the units or lanais. I searched for 'fireworks', 'watch from lanai', and similar phrases and found no evidence. Without explicit statements, a fireworks view cannot be assumed.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence supports a resident manager on-site. Historical MLS data showed RESMAN in 10 of 20 listings, and one current remark explicitly says the community association has "a recreation area, playground and resident manager among its amenities." The rest of the remarks are mostly silent on the topic, which is consistent with agents often copying MLS amenity data rather than describing it in prose.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.