Puu Heleakala
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Puu Heleakala
Building Overview
Puu Heleakala in Nanakuli-Maili (built 1974) with mountain and sunset views; resident manager on site.
About Puu Heleakala
Puu Heleakala is a condominium property located in the Nanakuli-Maili neighborhood, built in 1974. According to available records, the building is constructed of concrete, steel frame, and wood frame. Unit count and building size are not provided in the MLS data available.
Key features noted in the MLS data include mountain and sunset views and an on-site resident manager. The property does not allow pets and short-term rentals are not permitted, according to the provided information.
Additional details from the MLS indicate assigned parking is available. The management company is listed as unknown in the records. Based on MLS data analysis; buyers should verify all building details, rules, and fees with the listing agent or managing entity before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for owner-occupancy indicators such as an explicit percentage, 'majority owner occupied,' or similar language, but none were mentioned. Since no number was provided in the remarks, the owner-occupancy rate remains unknown.
I searched the public remarks for any explicit elevator references, including a count like '4 elevators' or generic phrases such as 'multiple elevators,' and found none. Because no current elevator value was provided and the remarks do not confirm one, this remains unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence for common-area electricity is moderate rather than explicit. The current MLS data includes OTCOEX in 11 of 20 listings, but the public remarks do not directly state that hallways, elevators, or other common-area power is included. This looks more like MLS checkbox usage than strong remark-based confirmation.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Hot water inclusion is not supported. Across the remarks, several listings mention a water heater or gas water heater, and the MLS pattern (0/20 HOTWAT vs. 15/20 WTRHTR) strongly points to building-supplied hot water being absent.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer inclusion is well supported across the set. At least several remarks explicitly state that fees include sewer, and the MLS data is also highly consistent with 15 of 20 listings checked for SEWER. This is strong, repeated confirmation rather than isolated agent copy-paste.
Water inclusion is very strongly supported. The remarks repeatedly and explicitly mention water being included in the monthly maintenance fees, and the MLS data is highly consistent at 18 of 20 listings. This appears to be a stable building-level feature confirmed across many listings and agents.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence confirms patio/deck access in Puu Heleakala. Across the remarks, well over a dozen listings mention phrases like “BIG COVERED PATIO,” “covered patio,” “lanai,” “large front and back patios,” and “private lanai,” showing this is a recurring building feature rather than a one-off copy/paste error.
The building appears to offer a shared walking/jogging path, with at least one current remark directly naming a "walking/jogging path." This aligns with the prior high-confidence MLS data and is consistent with the broader community-amenity descriptions in the listings.
No analysis available
Private yard space is strongly supported for Puu Heleakala. Dozens of remarks mention it, including phrases like 'private fenced yard,' 'fully fenced backyard,' 'private backyard,' and 'private, fully fenced concrete courtyard,' indicating this is a recurring building feature rather than a one-off listing error. The evidence is consistent across multiple listings and agents, and the current MLS amenities still show PRIYAR in a substantial share of listings.
No analysis available
Strong, repeated building-level evidence supports a shared recreation area at Puu Heleakala. Multiple listings explicitly describe a "recreation area," "recreation center," "clubhouse," or "community center" with amenities like a pavilion, playground, basketball court, and open fields, which appears across many agents rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage is supported by multiple public remarks across the building, not just MLS checkboxes. At least 4 listings explicitly reference storage-related space, including "storage closet and shelving within the garage," "front entry area ideal for storage," "back storage area," and "pantry storage." The evidence appears consistent across multiple agents rather than a single copy-paste source, so the feature should remain included.
The remarks reference nearby beaches and surfing lifestyle but do not mention any dedicated surfboard or board storage areas in the building or complex. I specifically searched for terms like 'surfboard storage', 'board storage', 'surf storage', and similar phrases and found no evidence. Given this absence, it is moderately likely that there is no dedicated surfboard storage facility.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across dozens of listings, remarks consistently describe the Puu Heleakala recreation center as having a pavilion, playground, basketball court, and open fields, with no mention of a pool. Only 1 of 20 MLS entries has a pool-related amenity box checked, which conflicts with all narrative descriptions. This strongly suggests the building does not have a pool and that the isolated MLS pool entry is mistaken.
No analysis available
I searched all remarks for terms like 'salt water pool', 'saltwater pool', 'salt pool', or 'saline pool' and found no references. Listings describe a recreation center and outdoor amenities without mentioning any swimming pool, suggesting there is no salt water pool. Based on this absence, the building is assumed not to have a salt water pool.
In-unit laundry is supported by both MLS inclusions and public remarks. Multiple listings explicitly say "new washer/dryer," "in unit laundry," and "washer and dryer," indicating this is a real building feature rather than a copy-paste error. The evidence is consistent across several remarks and aligns with the current MLS data.
No analysis available
There are no references to coin-op, card-op, or fee-based community laundry in any listing remarks. Mentions of in-unit laundry suggest residents are not relying on a paid shared laundry facility.
No listing remarks mention community laundry on every floor or any shared laundry rooms. The properties are described as townhomes with in-unit or private laundry, which makes a floor-by-floor community laundry setup unlikely.
Parking is clearly a building-level feature. Across the provided remarks, dozens of listings mention parking, including phrases like "two assigned parking stalls," "2 open parking stalls," "2 parking stalls," and "carport-garage." The evidence is consistent across multiple listings and appears to be broad building-level information rather than a one-off agent error.
Assigned/reserved parking is strongly supported at the building level. Well over a dozen remarks mention it directly, most commonly as '2 assigned parking stalls' or 'two assigned parking spaces,' and some also describe 'deeded' or 'designated' spaces. The consistency across many different listings and agents suggests this is a real shared building feature, not just copy-paste noise.
Covered parking is clearly offered in this building. At least several listings explicitly mention a garage or carport-garage, including phrases like 'two-car garage,' '2 car garage,' and 'carport -garage.' The repeated references across different remarks make this high-confidence rather than a copy-paste anomaly.
The remarks explicitly indicate deeded parking tied to the unit. Other mentions of assigned stalls are consistent with that, but the deeded parking statement is the key evidence.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for parking fee language such as monthly parking charges, rental fees, or additional stall costs and found none. Parking is discussed as assigned/deeded in several listings, but no separate fee is stated.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for explicit references to a parking waitlist or instructions to join one and found nothing. The listings instead mention assigned, deeded, or garage parking, which does not suggest a waitlist system.
No analysis available
Listings reference items like a 'new security front door' and fenced or gated yards, but these are individual-unit features, not a building-wide card/fob system. I searched for terms such as key card, fob access, card reader, and electronic entry and found no evidence of a card-based access system, so this feature is likely not present.
No analysis available
The remarks describe community amenities (recreation center, playground, basketball court, parks) and a resident manager, but do not reference any security patrol service. I specifically looked for phrases like security patrol, roving security, and patrolled complex and found no evidence, so this feature is likely not present.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Window AC is explicitly mentioned in 1 listing: 'owners added 5 window AC's.' A separate listing mentions an 'AC split system,' which supports that the building has unit-level cooling options, but the clearest evidence for this feature is the direct window AC remark. Overall, this looks like a real building/unit feature rather than a copy-paste checkbox issue.
Concrete construction appears in a minority of current MLS records (4 of 20), with no explicit mention in the public remarks. This suggests the feature is present for some units/buildings, but the evidence is moderate and may reflect incomplete or copy-pasted MLS data.
Double wall construction is strongly supported across the building, showing up in 16 of 20 current MLS listings. The public remarks do not mention it explicitly, but the repeated MLS data across many listings makes this a high-confidence building feature.
Hollow tile is supported by the MLS construction_materials field in 3 of 20 current listings, with prior data also pointing to hollow tile construction. None of the public remarks explicitly mention it, so the evidence is moderate rather than strong, but there is no indication it was corrected away.
No analysis available
Steel frame appears in 5 of 20 current MLS entries, but the public remarks are silent on construction type. That pattern suggests the MLS checkbox is likely capturing a real building feature for some listings, though it is not corroborated by agent comments.
Concrete slab construction appears only in a minority of MLS records, with about 5 of 20 listings showing SLAB. There are no remark-based confirmations of a slab foundation, so this looks like weak-to-moderate MLS evidence rather than a well-verified feature.
No analysis available
3/20 MLS records list WOOFRA in construction_materials and none explicitly contradict wood framing in remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for short-term rental indicators and found no evidence that STRs are allowed in this building. Because there are no explicit permission statements in the remarks, I’m treating it as not allowed based on absence of support.
I looked for hotel pool language such as hotel rental program, managed-by-hotel, or branded pool participation and found none. Since STR is not supported in the remarks, hotel-pool participation must also be false.
I searched for language indicating a required hotel rental pool or mandatory participation and found nothing. With no STR/hotel-pool evidence, there is also no basis for mandatory pool participation.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The building is described as leasehold, and the clearest lease-expiry reference gives 2050. I used the latest/most extended date mentioned in the remarks.
Public remarks directly confirm VA loan eligibility. There were no contradictory statements, so this is a strong affirmative signal for VA financing.
This is strong evidence that the HOA/building carries full insurance coverage. The explicit '100% hurricane insurance coverage' wording closely matches the full/walls-in insurance concept described in the feature definition.
No analysis available
I looked for language indicating the building passed a fire/life safety evaluation, FLSE compliance, fire safety certification, or a passed fire inspection, but found nothing. With no explicit mention in the remarks, I cannot confirm this feature.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Mountain views are strongly supported for Puu Heleakala. Across the provided remarks, at least 3 listings explicitly mention them with phrases like 'amazing mountain range,' 'peaceful mountain side privacy,' and 'views of the majestic Waianae mountain range.' This appears to be consistent across multiple agents rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sunset views are strongly supported for Puu Heleakala. At least 5 listings explicitly reference sunsets or equivalent wording, including "sunsets," "breathtaking sunsets," "magical sunsets each night," and "amazing mountain and sunset views." The evidence appears consistent across multiple agents/listings rather than a single copy-paste remark.
No analysis available
None of the public remarks mention being able to watch Friday night or any fireworks from the units or lanais. I searched for 'fireworks', 'watch from lanai', and similar phrases and found no evidence. Without explicit statements, a fireworks view cannot be assumed.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence supports a resident manager on-site. Historical MLS data showed RESMAN in 10 of 20 listings, and current remarks explicitly mention an "on-site resident manager" and "resident manager among its amenities." The repeated mention across listings suggests this is a real building-level amenity rather than a one-off agent checkbox.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.