Puu Heleakala
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Puu Heleakala
Building Overview
Puu Heleakala in Nanakuli-Maili (built 1974) with mountain and sunset views; resident manager on site.
About Puu Heleakala
Puu Heleakala is a condominium property located in the Nanakuli-Maili neighborhood, built in 1974. According to available records, the building is constructed of concrete, steel frame, and wood frame. Unit count and building size are not provided in the MLS data available.
Key features noted in the MLS data include mountain and sunset views and an on-site resident manager. The property does not allow pets and short-term rentals are not permitted, according to the provided information.
Additional details from the MLS indicate assigned parking is available. The management company is listed as unknown in the records. Based on MLS data analysis; buyers should verify all building details, rules, and fees with the listing agent or managing entity before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit owner-occupancy indicators like "80% owner occupied," "majority owner occupied," or similar phrases, but none were mentioned. The remarks do note a mix of investor/rental language and owner-occupant positioning, but that is not enough to infer a percentage.
I searched the public remarks for explicit elevator references such as "elevator," "elevators," "multiple elevators," or a stated count, and found none. The listings focus on townhouse features, parking, yards, and community amenities, but do not mention any building elevators.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is no direct public-remark support for common-area electricity being included in the maintenance fee across this set of listings. The only backing is partial MLS checkbox use (9 of 20 current records show OTCOEX), which looks inconsistent and possibly copy-pasted rather than verified.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Hot water inclusion is not supported. Across the remarks, several listings mention a water heater or gas water heater, and the MLS pattern (0/20 HOTWAT vs. 15/20 WTRHTR) strongly points to building-supplied hot water being absent.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer inclusion is strongly confirmed by both MLS data and remarks. Multiple listings explicitly state that monthly fees cover sewer, including wording like 'water, sewer, and trash pickup' and 'maint/ fees include water/sewer bill.'
Water inclusion is clearly confirmed. The public remarks repeatedly mention water being included in the monthly fees, and the MLS data is highly consistent with 18 of 20 current records showing WATER.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence confirms patio/deck access in Puu Heleakala. Across the remarks, well over a dozen listings mention phrases like “BIG COVERED PATIO,” “covered patio,” “lanai,” “large front and back patios,” and “private lanai,” showing this is a recurring building feature rather than a one-off copy/paste error.
The building appears to offer a shared walking/jogging path. At least one current remark directly says residents enjoy a "walking/jogging path," and the MLS data shows the related amenity code in some listings. While not mentioned in every listing, the explicit wording is strong enough to confirm the feature.
No analysis available
Strong, repeated evidence supports private yard availability in Puu Heleakala. Well over 20 remarks mention it, with multiple agents describing "private fenced yard," "fenced backyard," "fully fenced yard," "private backyard," and "enclosed yard"; several also note yard space for BBQs, pets, and outdoor living. The consistency across many listings suggests this is a real shared building/community feature rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
No analysis available
Strong repeated evidence that Pu'u Heleakala has a shared recreation area. Multiple listings explicitly describe a "recreation area," "recreation center with pavilion," and "community recreation center," often alongside playground, basketball court, and open fields. The consistency across many remarks supports this as a real building/community amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage is supported by multiple public remarks across the building, not just MLS checkboxes. At least 4 listings explicitly reference storage-related space, including "storage closet and shelving within the garage," "front entry area ideal for storage," "back storage area," and "pantry storage." The evidence appears consistent across multiple agents rather than a single copy-paste source, so the feature should remain included.
The remarks reference nearby beaches and surfing lifestyle but do not mention any dedicated surfboard or board storage areas in the building or complex. I specifically searched for terms like 'surfboard storage', 'board storage', 'surf storage', and similar phrases and found no evidence. Given this absence, it is moderately likely that there is no dedicated surfboard storage facility.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across dozens of listings, remarks consistently describe the Puu Heleakala recreation center as having a pavilion, playground, basketball court, and open fields, with no mention of a pool. Only 1 of 20 MLS entries has a pool-related amenity box checked, which conflicts with all narrative descriptions. This strongly suggests the building does not have a pool and that the isolated MLS pool entry is mistaken.
No analysis available
I searched all remarks for terms like 'salt water pool', 'saltwater pool', 'salt pool', or 'saline pool' and found no references. Listings describe a recreation center and outdoor amenities without mentioning any swimming pool, suggesting there is no salt water pool. Based on this absence, the building is assumed not to have a salt water pool.
In-unit laundry is supported by both MLS inclusions and public remarks. Multiple listings explicitly say "new washer/dryer," "in unit laundry," and "washer and dryer," indicating this is a real building feature rather than a copy-paste error. The evidence is consistent across several remarks and aligns with the current MLS data.
No analysis available
There are no references to coin-op, card-op, or fee-based community laundry in any listing remarks. Mentions of in-unit laundry suggest residents are not relying on a paid shared laundry facility.
No listing remarks mention community laundry on every floor or any shared laundry rooms. The properties are described as townhomes with in-unit or private laundry, which makes a floor-by-floor community laundry setup unlikely.
Parking is clearly a building-level feature. Across the provided remarks, dozens of listings mention parking, including phrases like "two assigned parking stalls," "2 open parking stalls," "2 parking stalls," and "carport-garage." The evidence is consistent across multiple listings and appears to be broad building-level information rather than a one-off agent error.
Assigned parking is strongly supported at the building level. Numerous listings mention "two assigned parking stalls," "2 assigned parking spaces," "two side-by-side assigned parking stalls," and "deeded with TWO parking spaces." This is consistent across many listings and multiple agents, so it does not look like copy-paste checkbox noise.
Covered parking is clearly offered in this building. At least several listings explicitly mention a garage or carport-garage, including phrases like 'two-car garage,' '2 car garage,' and 'carport -garage.' The repeated references across different remarks make this high-confidence rather than a copy-paste anomaly.
There is explicit public remark evidence that parking is deeded with the unit. Other listings also mention assigned parking stalls, which is consistent with deeded parking.
No analysis available
I searched the public remarks for parking-fee language such as monthly parking cost, additional parking charge, or parking rental, and found none. The listings consistently mention assigned parking stalls, two-car garages, or open parking, but do not state any separate parking fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for explicit references to a parking waitlist, parking waiting list, or instructions to join one and found nothing. The remarks describe parking as assigned, garage, or open stalls, with no indication that parking requires waiting.
No analysis available
Listings reference items like a 'new security front door' and fenced or gated yards, but these are individual-unit features, not a building-wide card/fob system. I searched for terms such as key card, fob access, card reader, and electronic entry and found no evidence of a card-based access system, so this feature is likely not present.
No analysis available
The remarks describe community amenities (recreation center, playground, basketball court, parks) and a resident manager, but do not reference any security patrol service. I specifically looked for phrases like security patrol, roving security, and patrolled complex and found no evidence, so this feature is likely not present.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Window AC is explicitly mentioned in 1 listing: 'owners added 5 window AC's.' A separate listing mentions an 'AC split system,' which supports that the building has unit-level cooling options, but the clearest evidence for this feature is the direct window AC remark. Overall, this looks like a real building/unit feature rather than a copy-paste checkbox issue.
Concrete construction appears in a minority of current MLS records (4 of 20), with no explicit mention in the public remarks. This suggests the feature is present for some units/buildings, but the evidence is moderate and may reflect incomplete or copy-pasted MLS data.
Double wall construction is strongly supported across the building, showing up in 16 of 20 current MLS listings. The public remarks do not mention it explicitly, but the repeated MLS data across many listings makes this a high-confidence building feature.
MLS construction_materials includes HOLTIL (hollow tile) in 3 of 20 current listings; prior data also flagged hollow tile. However, none of the public remarks mention 'hollow tile' or 'hollow tile construction', so supporting evidence is limited and may reflect inconsistent agent checkbox usage rather than explicit description in remarks. Given prior MLS indications but lack of explicit remarks, flag the building as having hollow tile construction with moderate confidence.
No analysis available
Steel frame appears in 5 of 20 current MLS entries, but the public remarks are silent on construction type. That pattern suggests the MLS checkbox is likely capturing a real building feature for some listings, though it is not corroborated by agent comments.
Concrete slab construction appears only in a minority of MLS records, with about 5 of 20 listings showing SLAB. There are no remark-based confirmations of a slab foundation, so this looks like weak-to-moderate MLS evidence rather than a well-verified feature.
No analysis available
3/20 MLS records list WOOFRA in construction_materials and none explicitly contradict wood framing in remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for short-term rental indicators such as STR allowed, vacation rental, NUC, TVU, or hotel-pool language and found no evidence. Given the absence of any public remark supporting STR use, this is best treated as not allowed based on the available listing text, though confidence is only moderate because there is no explicit prohibition.
I looked for hotel pool or hotel rental program references such as Hilton/Trump/Ritz pool or managed-by-hotel language and found none. Since there is no evidence STR is allowed, this must also be false.
I searched for language indicating mandatory hotel-pool participation, required rental-program enrollment, or cannot-opt-out rules, and found nothing. With no evidence of any STR program at all, mandatory participation is not supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The property is described as leasehold in the remarks, and one listing gives a specific lease end year of 2050. This is the most direct and current lease-expiry information available.
The listings directly state that the building is VA approved, which supports VA financing eligibility. No contradictory remarks were found.
The remarks explicitly state that the building has "100% hurricane insurance coverage," which strongly supports full HOA building insurance / walls-in coverage. This is direct evidence and overrides any weaker historical uncertainty.
No analysis available
I looked for language indicating a passed fire/life safety evaluation, FLSE compliance, fire safety certification, or a passed fire inspection, and found nothing in the remarks. There is no public-remarks evidence to support marking this as true.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Mountain views are strongly supported for Puu Heleakala. Across the provided remarks, at least 3 listings explicitly mention them with phrases like 'amazing mountain range,' 'peaceful mountain side privacy,' and 'views of the majestic Waianae mountain range.' This appears to be consistent across multiple agents rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sunset views are strongly supported for Puu Heleakala. At least 4-6 listings explicitly reference sunset or equivalent wording, including phrases like "breathtaking sunsets," "magical sunsets each night," and "amazing mountain and sunset views." Even though only 3/20 current MLS listings show SUNSET and 8/20 show NONE, the repeated remark-level mentions across multiple agents support that some units in the building do offer sunset views.
No analysis available
None of the public remarks mention being able to watch Friday night or any fireworks from the units or lanais. I searched for 'fireworks', 'watch from lanai', and similar phrases and found no evidence. Without explicit statements, a fireworks view cannot be assumed.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence strongly supports a resident manager on-site. Historical MLS data showed RESMAN in 10 of 20 listings, and current remarks explicitly mention an "on-site resident manager" and a "resident manager among its amenities." This appears consistent across multiple listings rather than a one-off copy/paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.