Punchbowl Place
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Punchbowl Place
Building Overview
Punchbowl Place in Nuuanu-Punchbowl, built 1986 with concrete construction; pets allowed and short-term rentals not permitted.
About Punchbowl Place
Punchbowl Place is located in the Nuuanu-Punchbowl neighborhood. According to available records, the building was constructed in 1986 and is of concrete construction. MLS-sourced data does not specify unit count, floor plans, or building height, so buyers should verify size and layout details with listing documents or the managing entity.
Based on MLS data, key policies for the building include that pets are allowed and short-term rentals are not permitted. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS records. No explicit list of amenities (such as pool, gym, or common areas) is provided in the available data.
Additional details such as parking provisions, maintenance or association fees, and specific lease or rental restrictions are not included in the MLS summary. Buyers and agents should confirm parking, fee structures, management contact, and any other property-specific rules directly with the seller, HOA, or management before making decisions. This description is based on MLS data and should be independently verified.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I looked for owner-occupancy percentages or descriptive hints such as "majority owner occupied" or "highly owner occupied," but found none. The remarks mention investors and first-time buyers, which suggests a mix of occupants, but they do not provide a usable owner-occupancy percentage.
I searched the public remarks for explicit elevator language such as "elevators," "multiple elevators," or a count like "4 elevators," but found nothing. The building is described as a boutique, secure condo, yet the remarks do not confirm whether it has elevators or how many.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Common area electricity appears to be included in the maintenance fee in most current listings, with 6 of 8 MLS records showing OTCOEX. None of the public remarks explicitly spell this out, so the evidence is moderately strong and looks like MLS-driven consistency rather than agent description.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Hot water is not supported by the current MLS pattern: none of the 8 listings include HOTWAT, and most instead list WTRHTR, which is a strong indicator that hot water is not building-paid. The remarks are silent on this point, reinforcing the exclusion.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer is consistently included across all reviewed listings, with 8 of 8 MLS records showing SEWER. This is strong, consistent building-level evidence and does not rely on ambiguous remarks.
Water is consistently included across all reviewed listings, with 8 of 8 MLS records showing WATER. The evidence is unanimous in the MLS data and appears reliable for the building overall.
BBQ is supported by the MLS history and at least one public remark explicitly mentioning a "BBQ area." The rest of the remarks do not add conflicting evidence, so this appears to be a real shared amenity rather than a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listing remarks reference a car wash facility, so the current evidence does not validate this amenity. The MLS checkbox data showing 3/7 listings with CRWSH looks potentially copy-pasted or unverified, so the feature is not supported from the remarks available.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence supports patio/deck availability in the building, though it looks limited to some units rather than all. One recent listing explicitly mentions a "spacious outdoor patio," and the current MLS amenities flags PATDEC/COVPAT in 2 of 8 listings. The pattern suggests a real feature, not just a one-off copy/paste error, but the coverage is still moderate rather than universal.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
In-unit laundry is strongly supported and consistently confirmed across multiple listings. At least 4 current remarks explicitly mention 'in-unit washer/dryer' or equivalent wording, which aligns with the historical MLS data showing 8/8 inclusions. The evidence appears consistent across different listings rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Assigned parking is supported by both MLS data and remarks. At least 2 listings explicitly mention an "assigned covered parking stall," while the current MLS set shows 5/7 with ASSIGN. The evidence is strong and consistent across multiple listings, not just a single agent note.
Covered parking is strongly confirmed. At least 4-5 listings explicitly say 'secured covered parking stall,' 'assigned covered parking stall,' or 'secured gated covered parking,' matching the historical 8/8 MLS parking feature data. The evidence appears consistent across multiple remarks rather than a single copy-paste note.
The listings consistently indicate parking is covered, secured, assigned, or gated. I did not find language showing the stall is deeded to the unit, so deeded parking is not supported by the remarks.
No analysis available
I searched for monthly parking fees, parking rental charges, or other explicit parking cost language. The remarks only mention that parking is included as a stall, with no separate fee stated.
No analysis available
Secured entry is supported by several listings, including phrases like 'secure entry,' 'secured building entry,' 'secured building,' and 'gated parking.' This aligns with the historical MLS checkbox data and suggests a real building-level security feature rather than an agent error. The evidence is repeated across multiple remarks and agents.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for references to a parking waitlist, joining a list for parking, or limited parking access requiring a queue. None of the public remarks mention a waitlist system.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Window air conditioning is strongly supported for this building. At least 4 listings explicitly mention "window A/C" or "window AC," and the current MLS data shows ACWIUN in inclusions on all 8/8 listings. The repeated phrasing across multiple remarks suggests this is a real building feature, not a copy-paste anomaly.
Concrete construction is strongly supported by the MLS data, with 8 of 8 current listings indicating CONCRE in construction_materials. No public remarks suggest otherwise, and the repeated building-level data appears consistent across listings rather than a one-off agent copy-paste issue.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Two of six current MLS listings include SLAB in construction_materials, but none of the public remarks mention 'concrete slab' or similar foundation details. With no historical confidence and no remark evidence, the slab foundation is not sufficiently confirmed as a building-level feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Only 1 of 6 current MLS listings lists ABOGRO and none of the public remarks reference 'above ground' construction or materials. With no historical confidence and no remark corroboration, the evidence does not support including this as a building-level feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for explicit short-term rental permission language, including NUC, TVU, vacation rental, or minimum-stay references. There were no such remarks, and no evidence that STR is allowed in this building.
I looked for hotel rental pool references such as Hilton pool, Ritz pool, or managed-by-hotel language and found none. Because there is no evidence that STR is allowed, hotel pool participation is also not supported.
I searched for remarks indicating mandatory participation in a rental pool, such as required rental-program membership or inability to opt out. Nothing in the listings suggests a mandatory pool, and STR itself is not evidenced.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for leasehold language and any 4-digit lease expiry year such as "lease expires 2050" or "ground lease ends". Nothing in the remarks indicates the building is on leased land or provides an expiration year.
I searched the public remarks for explicit VA-related language such as "VA approved," "VA financing," or "VA loans accepted" and found none. Based on the remarks alone, there is no evidence this building is VA loan approved.
I searched the remarks for insurance language like fully insured, full insurance, walls-in coverage, or comprehensive building insurance and found no references. The listings mention maintenance fees and a well-managed building, but nothing that confirms full HOA insurance coverage.
No analysis available
I looked for fire/life safety compliance language such as FLSE passed, fire safety certified, life safety compliant, or passed fire inspection, but found no explicit reference. Without a direct statement in the remarks, I cannot confirm that the building passed a fire/life safety evaluation.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No listings in the remarks explicitly mention ocean or water views. Current comments only say '180 degree views' and 'island breezes,' which are too general to confirm an ocean view. This appears to remain a no-evidence feature despite multiple agents describing the unit’s outlook.
No current remark explicitly states a mountain view. References to Punchbowl and '180 degree views' are directional and location-based, not direct evidence of mountain scenery. This supports keeping mountain view as absent.
No analysis available
City views appear in the MLS data for 4 of 8 listings, suggesting some units in the building have them. The remarks do not explicitly say 'city view,' but they do repeatedly reference 'moments from Honolulu’s vibrant city center' and 'near Downtown Honolulu,' which is consistent with a likely in-town/city outlook. Confidence is moderate because the public remarks are suggestive rather than explicit.
There are no explicit coastline or shoreline references in the remarks. Current text only provides broad view language and location convenience, not evidence of coastal scenery. The feature remains unsupported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sunset views appear in 2 of 8 current MLS listings, which is enough to suggest the building offers this feature in some units. However, none of the public remarks explicitly mention sunset, evening sun, or western exposure, so confidence remains moderate rather than high. This could reflect selective marketing rather than a building-wide guarantee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence for a resident manager is present in 1 of 7 public remarks and in the current MLS amenities on 2 listings. The clearest phrase is "resident manager on property," which directly matches the feature definition. The MLS checkbox appears to be partially populated, but the explicit remark supports that the building does have an on-site manager.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.