
Punchbowl Place
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Punchbowl Place
Building Overview
Punchbowl Place in Nuuanu-Punchbowl, built 1986 with concrete construction; pets allowed and short-term rentals not permitted.

About Punchbowl Place
Punchbowl Place is located in the Nuuanu-Punchbowl neighborhood. According to available records, the building was constructed in 1986 and is of concrete construction. MLS-sourced data does not specify unit count, floor plans, or building height, so buyers should verify size and layout details with listing documents or the managing entity.
Based on MLS data, key policies for the building include that pets are allowed and short-term rentals are not permitted. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS records. No explicit list of amenities (such as pool, gym, or common areas) is provided in the available data.
Additional details such as parking provisions, maintenance or association fees, and specific lease or rental restrictions are not included in the MLS summary. Buyers and agents should confirm parking, fee structures, management contact, and any other property-specific rules directly with the seller, HOA, or management before making decisions. This description is based on MLS data and should be independently verified.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for any stated owner-occupancy percentage or descriptive phrases and found none. Because no numeric value exists in current data and there is no explicit statement in the remarks, owner-occupancy is unknown.
I searched the public remarks for explicit elevator language (e.g., 'elevator', '4 elevators', 'multiple elevators', 'four elevators') and found no references. Because there is no prior numeric value and no explicit mention, I cannot infer a number and leave this as unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
4 of 5 current listings include OTCOEX (common area electricity) in the association_fee_includes. Public remarks do not explicitly state 'common electric' or similar, so the evidence is primarily from MLS checkboxes and appears consistent across multiple agent listings (possible copy/paste).
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings indicate 'hot water included' (0/5 HOTWAT), and 4 of 5 explicitly list WTRHTR (water heater) in unit inclusions. Public remarks do not contradict this; strong evidence that hot water is not included in the maintenance fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 5 current listings include SEWER in the association_fee_includes. While public remarks don't explicitly say 'sewer included,' the unanimous MLS checkbox usage across multiple listings provides strong evidence that sewer is included in maintenance fees.
All 5 listings list WATER in association_fee_includes. Although remarks don't explicitly state 'water included,' the consistent presence of the WATER checkbox across all current listings indicates water is included in the maintenance fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence comes from 1 of 5 recent listings that explicitly describes a 'spacious outdoor patio' for a ground-floor unit, plus another remark noting a shared 'BBQ area.' MLS checkbox presence is limited (1/5) and historical confidence is not available, so inclusion is based on explicit unit-level remark(s) and implied common outdoor amenity across listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All current MLS listings for the building list washer/dryer in inclusions (5/5). Four separate public remarks explicitly say phrases like 'washer/dryer', 'in-unit washer/dryer', and 'washer and dryer in the unit', indicating multiple units in the building offer in-unit laundry; evidence is consistent across listings and aligns with the MLS checkboxes.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Covered parking is supported by MLS checkbox data (5/5 listings) and explicit remarks in 4 listings quoting phrases like "covered parking stall", "assigned covered parking stall", and "secured gated covered parking." Evidence is consistent across multiple agent remarks and the MLS flags, so confidence is high.
The listings consistently reference an assigned/secured covered parking stall, gated parking, and 'assigned covered parking stall', but they do not state that the stall is deeded or owned with the unit. Absence of the word 'deeded' leads to treating deeded parking as not indicated.
No analysis available
I searched for phrases like 'parking fee', 'monthly parking', or 'parking rental' and found no references. The presence or amount of any parking fee cannot be determined from these remarks.
No analysis available
Multiple public remarks (4 of 5 listings) explicitly reference secured entry/parking with phrases such as "secure entry", "secured building entry and gated parking", and "secured gated covered parking." This corroboration across listings provides high confidence that parking has secured entry despite fewer MLS checkbox flags.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for any indication of a parking waitlist or instructions to join a waiting list but found none. Therefore a parking waitlist is not indicated in the public remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All five current MLS listings include the ACWIUN checkbox. Three separate public remarks explicitly state window air conditioning (quotes: 'window ac', 'window AC', 'window A/C units'), indicating multiple agents/units report window units. Given unanimous MLS checkbox data plus multiple remarks, there is strong evidence that some units in the building have window AC.
All five current listings (5/5) have the MLS construction material set to 'CONCRE' suggesting the building is concrete. However, none of the public remarks mention 'concrete', 'concrete building', or 'reinforced concrete', so the evidence appears to come solely from agent-entered MLS fields and could be copy/paste. Recommend confirming with owner, property manager, or building records for higher confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for explicit language permitting short-term rentals (or conversely a stated minimum stay) and found no references. With no evidence in the remarks, short-term rental allowance is not indicated.
Because short-term rentals are not mentioned and there is no reference to any hotel rental pool or hotel-managed program, hotel pool participation is not indicated. Per rules, if STR is not allowed/not mentioned, hotel pool must be false.
There is no evidence of any hotel rental pool or language requiring mandatory participation in a rental program. Given no STR allowance or hotel pool mention, mandatory pool participation is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for explicit leasehold/ground lease language and any 4-digit expiry year but found none. Therefore the lease expiry year is unknown from these remarks.
I searched the remarks for terms like 'VA approved', 'VA financing', or 'VA loans accepted' and found no references. With no evidence in the public remarks, VA financing approval is assumed not indicated.
I looked for explicit insurance coverage language (e.g., 'fully insured', 'walls-in coverage', 'full insurance') in the public remarks and found no references. Without explicit mention and no prior data, set to false with medium confidence.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for explicit FLSE/fire & life safety language and found none. With no prior value provided, the absence of any statement leads to a default of false with medium confidence (absence likely means not stated publicly).
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No listings mention ocean or water views (0/5). Remarks reference '180 degree views' and 'island breezes' but do not say 'ocean', 'water', 'Pacific Ocean' or 'makai', and MLS view_descriptions list OCEAN = 0, suggesting no building-level ocean view feature.
No listings mention mountain views (0/5). Remarks note expansive '180 degree views' but contain no 'mountain', 'Koolau', or 'mauka' language, and MLS view_descriptions show MOUNTA = 0, so mountain view is not supported.
No analysis available
0/5 listings explicitly mention a city view. While remarks emphasize proximity to downtown and '180 degree views', they do not explicitly describe a 'city' or 'downtown' view, so there is insufficient evidence to mark building-level city views.
0/5 listings explicitly mention coastline or shoreline views. Remarks include '180 degree views' but do not reference the coastline or shoreline, and MLS view_descriptions show COASTL = 0, so coastline view is not supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings mention sunset or western exposure (0/5). Remarks talk about expansive views but contain no explicit 'sunset' or related phrasing, so there is not enough evidence to include a sunset view feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.