Punahou Sunset
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Punahou Sunset
Building Overview
Punahou Sunset in Manoa: 1960 concrete building with sunset views and window air conditioning.
About Punahou Sunset
Punahou Sunset is a condominium building located in the Manoa neighborhood. According to available records, the building was constructed in 1960 and is of concrete construction. Size and unit count are not provided in the MLS data available for this listing.
Key features noted in MLS-derived data include sunset views and window air conditioning. Parking is listed as available. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed per the provided information. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS records.
Buyers should verify all details independently — this summary is based on MLS data only and does not include information on maintenance fees, amenities beyond those listed, or unit-specific features. Contact the listing agent or management for complete, up-to-date information.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for ownership clues such as percentages, "owner occupied," "majority owner occupied," or "highly owner occupied." The remarks only describe the building as a boutique, secure property and do not provide any owner-occupancy percentage, so this remains unknown.
I looked for explicit elevator counts such as "4 elevators," "multiple elevators," or "four elevators." The remarks only confirm that the building has at least one elevator undergoing modernization, but they never state how many elevators there are. Because the count is not explicit, the number remains unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
CABTV appears in just 1/6 current listings and there is no mention in any of the six public remarks (no phrases like "cable included" or "cable in HOA"). Because historical confidence is low/absent and remarks do not corroborate the single MLS checkbox, the evidence suggests cable is not a building-wide included fee.
All 8 current listings include common area electricity (OTCOEX) in association fees. This is consistent across listings and agents, suggesting it is a stable building-level feature rather than a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Six of seven listings include WTRHTR (water heater) in unit inclusions and only one listing checks HOTWAT. Public remarks reference a 'new... water heater,' supporting that hot water is provided by unit heaters rather than included in the HOA. This pattern across multiple listings suggests prior high-confidence metadata was likely incorrect and hot water is not included.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 8 current listings list sewer as included in the HOA/association fees. The evidence is uniform across listings, indicating a strong and stable building-level inclusion.
All 8 current listings show water included in association fees. The inclusion appears consistent across multiple agents and listings, making this a high-confidence building feature.
No listings mention BBQ, barbecue, grill, or grilling area in the public remarks. With only 1 of 8 current MLS records checking the amenity and no supporting description, this appears to be a likely MLS checkbox mismatch rather than a confirmed building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
In-unit laundry is clearly present in this building. Multiple current listings explicitly mention it, including phrases such as 'in-unit washer/dryer,' 'front load washer and dryer,' and 'new washer/dryer.' This is consistent with the prior high-confidence MLS data and appears repeatedly across listings rather than as a one-off agent error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings (4 of 6 show parking in MLS parking_features) and several public remarks explicitly mention assigned/covered parking ('assigned, covered parking', 'this building has secured parking'). Evidence is consistent across different agent remarks and MLS checkbox data, supporting high confidence that the building offers parking.
Assigned parking is strongly supported by the public remarks and aligns with the MLS history. At least 2 listings explicitly say "assigned, covered parking," and another references "1 covered parking," indicating reserved stalls are available in the building. The evidence is consistent across multiple listings, not just a single agent remark.
Covered parking is strongly confirmed. Multiple listings explicitly mention "assigned, covered parking" and "secured parking," while the MLS history already showed covered/garage-type parking in most listings. This is consistent across several remarks and appears to be a reliable building feature.
I looked for explicit deeded-ownership language like "deeded parking," "owned stall," or "parking included in deed." The remarks only describe the parking as assigned, covered, or secured, so deeded parking is not supported.
No analysis available
I searched for any reference to a monthly parking cost, parking rental fee, or additional parking charge, but found none. The remarks discuss parking access and type, not a separate fee.
MLS parking_features include GUEST in 4 of 7 listings, but none of the public remarks mention 'guest' or 'visitor' parking. The evidence is primarily MLS checkbox data (possible agent entry/copy-paste) so inclusion is tentative pending owner/property-manager verification.
Although only one MLS checkbox shows SECENT, several listings' remarks explicitly describe 'secured building', 'this building has secured parking and gated entry', providing strong corroboration. Multiple agent remarks referencing gated/secured entry yield high confidence that parking has secured entry.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for language such as "parking waitlist," "waiting list," or instructions to join a parking queue. There is no evidence in the remarks that the building uses a parking waitlist system.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Window AC appears to be a consistent building-level feature in the MLS: 8 of 8 current listings include ACWIUN in inclusions, with prior records also showing the same. The public remarks don’t call it out, but the repeated MLS checkbox data strongly supports that units in this building have window air conditioning units.
Strong building-level evidence supports concrete construction: 8 of 8 current MLS listings list 'CONCRE' in construction_materials. The public remarks do not explicitly say 'concrete,' but they are fully consistent with a concrete boutique 9-story building and there is no conflicting evidence. This appears to be stable, repeated MLS data rather than a one-off agent entry.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Insufficient evidence that the building is 'above ground' in construction: only 3 of 7 current MLS listings include ABOGRO and public remarks (0/7) do not mention above-ground materials. Given the lack of remarks and mixed MLS checkbox usage, the feature is likely not a reliable building-level attribute.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for explicit STR permission or restriction language, including short-term rental, vacation rental, NUC, TVU, and minimum-stay rules. Nothing in the remarks indicates STRs are allowed, so this is treated as not supported by the listing remarks.
I looked for references to hotel pool programs such as Hilton, Trump, Ritz, or any hotel-managed rental structure. There were no such mentions, and since STR is not supported in the remarks, this must remain false.
I searched for wording like mandatory pool, required rental program participation, or cannot opt out. No such language appears in the remarks, and without evidence of STR/hotel pool participation this remains false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the public remarks for leasehold language such as "lease expires," "ground lease," "leasehold," and renewal terms, but found nothing. Based on the remarks alone, there is no evidence to identify a lease expiry year.
The public remarks clearly indicate VA financing is available/approved for this building, at least for the listed unit and buyer pool. This is strong direct evidence from multiple listings.
I looked for wording like "fully insured," "full insurance," "walls-in coverage," and similar HOA insurance descriptions. The only insurance-related phrase is "100% hurricane insurance," which is not the same as full building/walls-in coverage, so I am not marking this as fully insured.
No analysis available
I searched for fire/life safety language such as "FLSE passed," "fire life safety evaluation passed," "fire safety certified," and similar phrases. Nothing in the remarks indicates the building has passed a fire/life safety evaluation, so this cannot be confirmed from the listings.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Mountain views are well-supported for this building. At least 2 listings explicitly say 'Mountain Views' or 'mountain views,' and the current MLS view data shows 4 of 8 listings tagged MOUNTA. The repeated phrasing across multiple remarks suggests a real building-level view option rather than an MLS mistake.
No analysis available
City views appear to be a legitimate feature of the building. Current MLS data shows CITY in 7 of 8 listings, and one remark explicitly says 'Mountain and city views.' This is strong evidence that some units offer city-facing outlooks, likely copied consistently because the feature is real.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sunrise views are only weakly supported. The current MLS data shows 1 of 8 listings tagged SUNRIS, but none of the public remarks explicitly mention sunrise, morning sun, or eastern exposure. This could reflect a single unit-specific exposure or an MLS checkbox/copy-paste issue, so confidence remains low.
At least one listing (repeated in the dataset) explicitly markets the enclosed lanai as 'perfectly designed to let you enjoy stunning sunset views every day', and no data contradicts the presence of sunset views for that stack.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.