Punahou Royale
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Punahou Royale
Building Overview
Punahou Royale in Makiki-Tantalus, built 1973; pets and short-term rentals are not allowed according to MLS data.
About Punahou Royale
Punahou Royale is a residential building located in the Makiki-Tantalus neighborhood. According to available records, the building was built in 1973. Size and construction type are not specified in the MLS data provided.
Based on MLS data, the property is governed by policies that do not allow pets and do not permit short-term rentals. The listing information does not include details on building amenities, unit features, or on-site services, and the management company is listed as unknown.
Additional information commonly of interest to buyers — such as parking availability, maintenance fees, specific unit configurations, and condo association rules — is not included in the MLS summary. This description is based on MLS data; buyers should verify all details with the listing agent, management, or through public records before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for phrases like '80% owner occupied', 'majority owner occupied', or other owner-occupancy indicators and found none. Without an explicit percentage or qualitative statement, the owner-occupancy percentage remains unknown.
Public remarks indicate elevator access exists (e.g., 'first unit just off the elevator' and references to parking with 'no stairs or elevator needed' for direct access), but no explicit number of elevators is given. I searched for numeric phrases like '4 elevators', 'four elevators', or 'multiple elevators' and found none, so the exact count is unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Only 1 of 8 current MLS listings includes OTCOEX (common area electric) and none of the public remarks mention common area electricity or 'building power included'. This appears to be an isolated checkbox use rather than a building-wide included utility, so the feature is omitted.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Seven of eight MLS listings list HOTWAT in association fee includes ('hot water'). Although public remarks do not explicitly state 'hot water included,' the consistent MLS checkbox across most listings (7/8) provides strong evidence that hot water is included in the maintenance fees.
No analysis available
No analysis available
8 of 9 recent MLS listings list SEWER in association fee includes (current MLS). Public remarks for this unit do not explicitly state 'sewer included' or similar language, suggesting the checkbox is likely being used consistently across agent listings rather than called out in remarks. Because historical confidence was Medium and many listings still check the box, include sewer as included but with moderate confidence.
8 of 9 recent MLS listings list WATER in association fee includes (current MLS). The provided public remarks make no explicit mention of 'water included' or 'water in HOA fees,' indicating the feature is inferred from repeated MLS checkbox usage across listings. Given medium historical confidence and consistent current checkboxes, report water as included with moderate confidence.
No public remarks mention BBQ/barbecue/grill. Although 5/9 current MLS listings have the BBQ amenity box checked, there is no corroborating language in agent remarks and no prior confidence history, suggesting the checkbox was likely over-applied; therefore BBQ is omitted.
No analysis available
No analysis available
At least one listing explicitly states 'resident car wash area.' Combined with 7/9 MLS listings checking CRWSH, there is consistent evidence across agents that the building offers a car wash facility.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings' public remarks mention a recreation room, rec room, or similar. The MLS shows only 1/9 listings with RECROO checked and there is no corroborating descriptive text, so the feature is omitted as likely an inconsistent checkbox.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Historically high confidence and 8/9 current MLS listings list TRACHU. No public remarks explicitly mention a trash/garbage chute, but the strong historical and MLS checkbox evidence across multiple listings supports keeping trash_chute = true.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence the building has shared laundry: 9/9 current MLS listings have the COMLAU amenity checked and this listing's remarks explicitly state 'Community Laundry' and 'community laundry' in multiple paragraphs. Multiple agents consistently mention the amenity (likely copy/pasted across listings), providing high-confidence confirmation of building-level shared laundry facilities.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence that the building offers assigned parking: 8 of 9 current MLS entries include ASSIGN and the public remarks explicitly state an 'assigned parking stall' (described as the first stall next to the lobby). Multiple agent remarks also reference direct access from 'your parking stall,' supporting assigned/reserved stalls across the building.
Covered parking is indicated across the building: 6 of 9 current MLS entries include covered/garage parking codes and several listing remarks explicitly mention 'Covered Parking' or 'one covered parking stall,' showing consistent confirmation from multiple agents.
The public remarks repeatedly reference an assigned/covered parking stall and direct access from the stall, but there is no explicit language that the parking is deeded/owned with the unit. I searched for 'deeded', 'owned parking', and 'included in deed' and found no mentions.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for 'parking fee', 'monthly parking', 'additional parking cost', and related terms and found no information about a parking fee. No evidence in remarks to confirm or deny a parking charge.
There is moderate evidence the building provides guest parking: 5 of 9 current MLS entries include a GUEST code and the public remarks include an explicit line noting 'guest and street parking.' The evidence is present but less consistently mentioned across agents compared with assigned and covered parking.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for 'parking waitlist', 'waiting list', and similar phrases and found none. The remarks describe assigned and guest parking but do not indicate a waiting-list system.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Consistent MLS data across all current listings (9 of 9) list construction_materials='CONCRE' (reinforced concrete). None of the public remarks mention a different construction type or a recent change; while agents sometimes copy/paste, the uniform checklist entries across multiple listings provide strong corroboration that the building is concrete.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for 'short-term rental allowed', 'STR', 'vacation rental', '30-day minimum', 'NUC', and similar phrases and found no indications that STRs are permitted. Absence of any STR language in multiple remarks suggests STRs are likely not allowed, but there is no explicit prohibition stated.
I searched for 'hotel rental pool', 'hotel rental program', and hotel brand affiliations and found none. Because the remarks contain no STR references, hotel pool participation is not indicated and is set false.
I searched for 'mandatory hotel pool', 'required to participate', 'must be in rental program', and similar phrases and found none. With no evidence of an STR or hotel pool program, mandatory pool participation is not supported by the public remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The listing repeatedly calls this a 'fee simple apartment,' which implies no land lease applies. I searched for phrases like 'lease expires', 'land lease to', and 'leasehold' and found none other than the explicit fee simple language.
Multiple remarks include the phrase 'VA approved,' indicating the building accepts VA financing. This is an explicit statement in the public remarks.
Public remarks explicitly state the building is '100% insured', indicating the HOA carries comprehensive/walls-in coverage. This explicit wording in the listing provides high confidence that the building is fully insured by the HOA.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for explicit language such as 'fire life safety evaluation passed', 'FLSE passed', 'fire safety certified', or 'passed fire inspection' and found no references. Because there is no mention and no current confirmed value, the feature is set to false with medium confidence (absence of mention suggests it is not stated publicly).
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Historically high confidence for mountain views. Current combined listing remarks include explicit mountain language (e.g., 'mountain view from the door'), so the building offers mountain views. Multiple agent remarks reference the mountain view, indicating consistent reporting across listings.
Historically high confidence for Diamond Head views. Current remarks include at least four explicit mentions of Diamond Head ('peek of Diamond Head', 'view of Diamond Head from the lanai', 'sweeping views...Diamond Head', 'Views of diamond head from your private patio'), showing consistent multi-listing confirmation.
Historically high confidence for city views. Current listing remarks explicitly mention city views in multiple places (e.g., 'pleasant city view', 'sweeping views of the city'), indicating the building offers city-view units and consistent agent reporting.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
6 of 9 current MLS listings include the RESMAN amenity checkbox. None of the public remarks explicitly state 'resident manager', 'on-site manager', or 'live-in manager' (remarks use phrases like 'well managed' and 'well run' but do not name a resident manager). Evidence is moderate — multiple agents checked the RESMAN box, but lack of explicit mention in remarks suggests possible copy/paste; therefore included with moderate confidence (0.75).
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.