Punahou Hale and Oahuan Tower Ltd
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Punahou Hale and Oahuan Tower Ltd
Building Overview
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
The remarks do not provide any owner-occupancy percentage or description. I searched for explicit percentage or phrases indicating owner-occupancy and found none, so the owner-occupancy percentage is unknown.
No explicit mention of any elevators in the public remarks. I searched the remarks for terms like 'elevator', '4 elevators', 'four elevators', and 'multiple elevators' and found none, so the number of elevators is unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Both listings (2/2) have OTCOEX checked in association_fee_includes, indicating common-area electricity is included, but neither public remark explicitly says 'common area electricity' or 'building power included'. The evidence comes from MLS checkbox data across multiple listings and appears implied rather than confirmed by agent remarks.
No analysis available
Electricity is explicitly mentioned in the public remarks of both listings (quotes: 'Maintenance fees include electricity' and 'electricity included in your monthly affordable maintenance fees'), and both listings also have ELECTR checked in MLS, providing strong, corroborated evidence.
No analysis available
Both listings (2/2) show HOTWAT checked in association_fee_includes, suggesting hot water is included in maintenance fees; however, neither public remark mentions hot water, so the evidence is implied from MLS fields rather than explicit agent statements.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Both listings (2/2) have SEWER checked in association_fee_includes indicating sewer is included in maintenance fees, but neither public remark references sewer, so support is based on MLS checkbox data rather than explicit remarks.
Both listings (2/2) show WATER checked in association_fee_includes, indicating water is included in maintenance fees; however, no public remarks mention 'water included', so the conclusion relies on MLS checkbox data rather than agent-confirmed remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Neither of the two public remarks mentions a recreation/rec/game room. MLS amenities show RECROO in 1/2 listings, but absence from both remarks and lack of historical confirmation suggests the checkbox may be a copy/paste mistake; insufficient evidence to include this building amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
One of the two current listings includes the amenity code 'STORAG/ADDLVSTORAG' indicating building storage/lockers, but none of the public remarks mention storage and no units list storage in unit features. Evidence is limited to a single MLS amenity checkbox (possible agent copy/paste), so inclusion is made with moderate confidence (0.70).
I searched for "surfboard storage", "board storage", "surf storage", and related terms and found none in the public remarks, so there is no evidence the building provides surfboard storage.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The building context shows no pool and the remarks contain no references to a pool or a "salt water/saltwater/saline" pool. Therefore salt pool is considered false and retained from building context.
No analysis available
Both current listings have the COMLAU amenity checked (2/2). One listing's public remarks explicitly say, 'Community laundry is conveniently located on site,' confirming shared laundry facilities; the other listing does not contradict this. MLS checkbox consistency across listings plus an explicit agent remark yields high confidence that the building has community laundry.
I looked for terms such as "coin laundry", "coin-op", "quarters", "paid laundry", and "card operated" but found none. The listing does not state whether the on-site laundry requires payment.
Public remarks confirm community laundry exists on site but make no mention of laundry on every floor. I searched for phrases like "laundry on each floor", "laundry room on every floor", and "floor-by-floor laundry" and found no matches.
Both listings' remarks state parking stalls are rentable (e.g., "stalls are available on a first-come, first-served basis for $120/month" and "parking immediately available for rent ($120/month)"). Although MLS checkboxes did not list assigned or garage parking, the consistent agent remarks across listings indicate the building provides non-deeded rentable parking stalls.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The public remarks explicitly say the unit does not include deeded parking, so parking is not deeded with high confidence. I used the quoted line as direct evidence.
No analysis available
The listing explicitly lists a monthly parking rental fee of $120, so the monthly parking fee is set to 120 with high confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks indicate first-come, first-served rental availability and immediate availability, which implies there is not a formal waitlist. No wording like 'waitlist' or 'join waitlist' was found.
No analysis available
I searched for terms like "key card access", "fob access", "card reader", and "electronic access" and found no references, so there is no evidence of card/fob security from the remarks.
No analysis available
I looked for phrases such as "security patrol", "roving security", and "patrol service" but found none. There is no evidence in the public remarks that the building employs a security patrol.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Both current listings (2/2) include 'CONCRE' in construction_materials, indicating concrete construction. Public remarks do not mention construction details and there is no contradicting agent comment; the consistency across both listings provides strong evidence the building is concrete.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
One of the two current listings (1/2) includes 'SLAB' in construction_materials, while the other does not and public remarks are silent. This gives moderate (implied) evidence that at least part of the building uses a concrete slab foundation, but the information is not consistently reported across agents.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for explicit STR language (allowed, permitted, NUC, TVU, 30-day minimum wording) and found none. In absence of any STR-related statements, STR is marked false with medium confidence.
No reference to any hotel rental pool or managed-hotel program appears in the remarks. Per rules, because STR is not allowed, hotel-pool participation is set to false.
There is no mention of a rental-hotel program or any requirement to participate. As STR is not allowed per the remarks, mandatory pool participation is set to false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for phrases like 'lease expires', 'land lease', or a four-digit expiry year. No leasehold or lease-expiry information appears in the remarks, so the lease expiry year is unknown (null).
I searched the remarks for 'VA approved', 'VA financing', or similar phrases. There were no mentions indicating VA loan approval, so we mark this as not found (false) with medium confidence due to absence of evidence.
The public remarks do not state that the HOA fully insures the building (phrases like 'fully insured', 'walls-in coverage', or 'comprehensive building insurance' are not present). With no mention, I assume not fully insured with medium confidence.
No analysis available
The remarks do not state that the building has passed a fire/life safety evaluation (e.g., 'FLSE passed', 'fire life safety evaluation passed'). Absence of mention leads to a medium-confidence assumption of false.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
0 of 2 current listings mention SUNSET in view_descriptions. Remarks highlight 'Diamond Head views' and ability to 'catch Friday night fireworks' from the rooftop, but do not explicitly say 'sunset', 'western exposure', or 'evening sun.' With MLS checkboxes unchecked and no direct mentions across listings, there is strong evidence the building should not be listed as having sunset views.
No analysis available
The public remarks explicitly say fireworks can be viewed from the building's rooftop deck, which indicates the building has views of Friday night fireworks. This is direct wording indicating view FROM the building.
No analysis available
No public remarks (0 of 2 listings) mention a resident or on-site manager. MLS amenities are mixed (RESMAN checked in 1/2 listings), and there is no user verification or explicit remark such as 'resident manager' or 'live-in manager.' Given the lack of corroborating remarks and limited MLS support, evidence for a resident manager is weak.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.