Punahou Chalet
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Punahou Chalet
Building Overview
Punahou Chalet in Manoa (built 1976) is a concrete building with a pool and fitness center.
About Punahou Chalet
Punahou Chalet is located in the Manoa neighborhood and was built in 1976. According to available records, the building is constructed of concrete and is used for residential occupancy.
Key on-site amenities listed in MLS data include a swimming pool, a fitness center, and a resident manager. Air conditioning is provided via window units.
Parking provisions noted in MLS data include covered and assigned parking, with guest parking available. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed. The management company is not listed in the MLS records. Based on MLS data, buyers should verify all details, fees, and rules with the seller or managing agent prior to purchase.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for explicit owner-occupancy information such as a percentage, "majority owner occupied," or similar language and found none. Because the listing text does not provide any occupancy rate, the value remains unknown.
I found a direct reference to a remodeled elevator, which supports that the building has elevator service. However, the remarks never state how many elevators there are (e.g., "2 elevators" or "multiple elevators"). Because the number is not explicit, this is only a low-confidence estimate.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
Cable TV inclusion is supported by the MLS in 5 of 9 current listings, though the public remarks do not explicitly say "cable included." This looks like repeated MLS reporting rather than a remark-confirmed amenity, so confidence is moderate.
Common-area electricity is supported by MLS inclusion in 4 of 9 listings and by repeated descriptions of shared amenities that require building power. The pattern across multiple listings suggests this is a building-level fee item rather than a one-off agent entry.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Hot water does not appear to be included in the maintenance fee. None of the current listings show HOTWAT, and most instead list a water heater as a unit appliance, which is a strong indicator against fee-included hot water.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer is consistently included across the building: all 9 current listings show SEWER in association_fee_includes. The remarks are silent, but the MLS checkbox is uniform and very strong.
Water is included in maintenance fees across nearly all current listings, with 8 of 9 showing WATER in association_fee_includes. There is no remark-level evidence to the contrary, so confidence is very high.
Very strong evidence: current MLS data shows BBQ in 7/9 listings, and remarks reference "barbecue area," "BBQ area," and "BBQ." The repeated wording across listings supports this as a shared building amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence: current MLS data shows the exercise amenity in 8/9 listings, and the remarks repeatedly call out "gym" and "exercise room." This appears consistent across multiple listings rather than a one-off agent copy/paste.
No analysis available
There is no clear evidence of a meeting room or conference room in the remarks. Current MLS data shows the amenity on only 2/9 listings, and the text points instead to a recreation/party room, so this is best treated as absent.
Patio/deck is strongly supported by the listing remarks: several units mention a lanai, including 'expansive covered lanai,' 'large lanai,' and 'enclosed lanai.' This appears consistently across multiple listings and agents, so it is not likely just copied checkbox data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Good evidence: current MLS data shows the recreation-room amenity in 7/9 listings, and at least one remark explicitly says "recreation room" while another says "party room." This looks like a genuine building amenity rather than a speculative checkbox.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence across multiple listings: current MLS data shows sauna in 6/9 listings, and the remarks directly say "sauna." This is consistent and clearly building-level.
Strong evidence the building offers storage/lockers: MLS amenity checkbox is set in 7 of 8 current listings and unit_features in 5 of 8. At least three current public remarks explicitly state storage (quotes: "individual unit storage", "separate storage closet on the same floor", "Separate storage room located directly across unit"), indicating the feature is consistently represented across agents rather than a single copy/paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Very strong MLS consistency: all current listings show the trash chute amenity. Public remarks do not usually mention it, but the database evidence is uniform and high confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Very strong evidence: the building is repeatedly described as having a "jacuzzi" or "hot tub," which directly matches the whirlpool feature. Current MLS data also supports it on 6/9 listings.
Pool is strongly supported and appears to be a shared building amenity. It is explicitly mentioned in 6 of the 8 remarks, with phrases like "Amenities include a swimming pool," "pool, jacuzzi, BBQ area," and "building amenities include: pool, jacuzzi." The evidence is consistent across multiple listings and agents, so this is not just a copy-paste MLS checkbox issue.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Laundry in unit is strongly supported across the listings. At least 2 remarks explicitly mention "washer/dryer in the unit" or list "washer, dryer" among the appliances, and the historical MLS data shows 8/9 listings including washer/dryer. This looks consistent across multiple agents rather than a one-off copy/paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Assigned parking is strongly supported across multiple listings. Remarks explicitly state '2 ASSIGNED PARKING STALLS!' and '1 assigned stall,' while MLS history was already high confidence. This appears consistent across agents rather than a copy-paste anomaly.
Covered parking is well supported by both MLS history and remarks. Multiple listings describe covered stalls/covered parking directly, including '1 assigned covered parking spot' and 'one secured, covered parking stall.'
I searched for wording such as "deeded parking," "owned parking," "parking included in deed," or "owned stall." The listings consistently describe assigned and secured parking, which indicates use of stalls but not deeded ownership. So parking_deeded is set to false with low confidence.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit parking cost language such as "parking fee," "monthly parking," or "parking rental." The remarks only mention assigned, gated, and guest parking, with no price or fee information. Absence of a fee mention suggests no publicly stated parking fee.
Guest parking appears to be available at the building. At least one remark explicitly says 'Guest parking downstairs,' which aligns with the strong historical MLS pattern showing guest parking on most listings.
Secured-entry parking is supported by both MLS history and current remarks. Listings reference 'secured, covered parking stall' and 'gated parking,' indicating parking access is controlled rather than open.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for terms like "parking waitlist," "waiting list," or "join waitlist for parking." The listings instead describe parking as assigned and available, including guest parking, with no reference to a queue. Therefore parking_waitlist is set to false with low confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Window AC appears to be a building-level feature based on MLS inclusions rather than listing remarks. ACWIUN is present in 8 of 9 current listings, which is strong evidence that units in Punahou Chalet have window air conditioning or allow window AC units. The public remarks across multiple listings do not mention AC directly, so this is driven primarily by the repeated MLS checkbox pattern.
Concrete construction is strongly supported across the building record. All current listings' MLS data indicate CONCRE, which aligns with the prior high-confidence history and shows no sign of agent correction or disagreement in remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Only 1 of 7 current MLS listings has MASSTU checked and there is no historical data or any public remarks referencing masonry or stucco. Given the lack of corroborating remarks and the isolated checkbox, the masonry/stucco designation appears unlikely and is omitted pending clearer verification.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Above-ground construction appears only once in the current MLS checkbox data and is not referenced in any of the public remarks. With no historical confidence and only a single checkbox hit, this looks more like isolated MLS entry than strong building-level evidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for short-term rental indicators such as "STR allowed," "vacation rental," "TVU," "NUC," and 30-day minimum language. The public remarks focus on residential features and amenities only, with no evidence that short-term rentals are allowed. On that basis, this is set to false with low confidence.
I looked for references to a hotel rental pool, branded hotel management, or participation in a hotel program. Nothing in the remarks suggests the building participates in such a pool, and there is no evidence STRs are allowed. Because STR must be allowed first, this is false.
I searched for language indicating mandatory participation such as "must be in rental program," "required to rent," or "cannot opt out." The remarks contain no hotel-pool references and no STR authorization. Since there is no evidence of any pool program, this is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for land tenure terms like "lease expires," "land lease," "leasehold," and explicit expiration years. The remarks contain no references to leasehold status or a lease end date. Because there is no evidence, the expiry year remains unknown.
I searched the public remarks for VA-related language such as "VA approved," "VA financing," and "VA loans accepted." Nothing in the listings indicates the building is VA loan approved. Based on the absence of evidence, this is set to false with low confidence.
I looked for any wording that the HOA provides full building insurance or walls-in coverage, but the remarks do not mention it. Without explicit public-remarks support, there is no basis to mark the building as fully insured.
No analysis available
I searched the public remarks for language indicating the building passed a fire/life safety evaluation or similar compliance language and found nothing. Since this is only determined from remarks and there is no explicit confirmation, I am treating it as not evidenced in the listing text.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
2 of 8 current MLS view_descriptions include MOUNTA, but none of the agent remarks mention mountain/mauka/Koolau views. Evidence is limited to MLS checkbox entries (no corroborating remarks), suggesting a small subset of units may have mountain views rather than a building-wide feature.
At least 2 of the aggregated listings explicitly mention Diamond Head: "city views toward Diamond Head" and "views of downtown and Diamond Head." This is direct, repeated agent language across different listings, indicating some units offer Diamond Head views despite MLS checkbox absence.
Strong building-level evidence that Punahou Chalet offers city views. The current MLS data is unanimous (9/9 CITY, 0/9 NONE), and multiple listings independently describe 'city views toward Diamond Head' and 'views of downtown and Diamond Head.' This appears consistent across agents rather than a copy-paste anomaly.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
1 of 8 current MLS view_descriptions include SUNSET, but none of the public remarks explicitly reference sunset or western exposure. This suggests a possible single/unit-level sunset exposure rather than a broadly advertised building feature; evidence is weak but present in MLS checkboxes.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The current MLS data is consistent across all 9 listings, with RESMAN checked each time. None of the public remarks explicitly mention a resident manager, on-site manager, or live-in manager, which suggests the checkbox may be copy/pasted rather than described in marketing copy. Still, the unanimous MLS coding supports including resident_manager for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.