Punahou Chalet
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Punahou Chalet
Building Overview
Punahou Chalet in Manoa (built 1976) is a concrete building with a pool and fitness center.
About Punahou Chalet
Punahou Chalet is located in the Manoa neighborhood and was built in 1976. According to available records, the building is constructed of concrete and is used for residential occupancy.
Key on-site amenities listed in MLS data include a swimming pool, a fitness center, and a resident manager. Air conditioning is provided via window units.
Parking provisions noted in MLS data include covered and assigned parking, with guest parking available. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed. The management company is not listed in the MLS records. Based on MLS data, buyers should verify all details, fees, and rules with the seller or managing agent prior to purchase.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit owner-occupancy information (percentages or phrases like '80% owner occupied', 'majority owner occupied', 'highly owner occupied') but the public remarks do not discuss owner vs. investor occupancy. As a result, owner-occupancy percentage cannot be determined from these listings.
I searched the public remarks for explicit elevator references (e.g., '4 elevators', 'four elevators', 'multiple elevators') and found no mention. Because there is no explicit elevator count in the remarks, the elevator count remains unknown from these listings.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
4 of 7 current listings list CABTV in association_fee_includes, but none of the public remarks explicitly state 'cable included' and reporting appears inconsistent across agents. This is likely agent-checked data (possible copy/paste), so we include cable as offered by the building with moderate confidence.
Multiple listings (3/6) explicitly include a common-expense item in association_fee_includes and all describe powered common amenities (pool, hot tub, gym, sauna, rec/party room) that require building-supplied electricity. Given standard condo practice that owners do not separately meter or pay for hallway/elevator/common-area power, it is very likely that common-area electricity is included in the maintenance fees. Omitted checkboxes on some listings are best interpreted as incomplete data entry, not a different billing structure.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
None of the 7 listings show HOTWAT in association_fee_includes and most listings include WTRHTR (water heater) as a unit appliance; remarks explicitly list 'water heater' among appliances. Strong, consistent evidence across listings indicates hot water is not included in the maintenance fees.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 7 current listings list SEWER in association_fee_includes. While the remarks don't explicitly mention sewer, the unanimous MLS checkbox reporting across multiple agents is consistent and indicates sewer is included in the maintenance fees.
All 7 current listings list WATER in association_fee_includes. Remarks are silent on water-in-fees, but the consistent MLS checkbox across listings provides strong evidence that water is included in the maintenance fees.
Good evidence: 5 of 7 MLS listings list BBQ in amenities and several remarks explicitly reference 'BBQ', 'barbecue' or 'barbecue area' (e.g., 'barbecue, and recreation room', 'barbecue, and gym'). While agents sometimes copy/paste, the repeated explicit mentions across listings support including BBQ as a building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence: current MLS shows 6/7 listings with the exercise/fitness amenity and multiple public remarks state 'exercise room' or 'gym' (e.g., 'exercise room', 'gym'). Historical data already rated High and the remarks confirm the building-level fitness facility across multiple agents, so include this feature with high confidence.
No analysis available
Limited evidence: only 1 of 7 MLS records lists a meeting-room amenity and public remarks provided do not mention any meeting or conference room. With no corroborating remarks and low historical support, the building is unlikely to offer a distinct meeting/conference room for general resident use.
Multiple listing remarks explicitly mention lanai/outdoor space: examples include 'large lanai', 'enclosed lanai', and 'Large covered lanai'. Although only 2/7 MLS checkbox entries currently list PATDEC/COVPAT, at least 3–4 separate public remarks across listings describe lanais, so there is strong, multi-listing evidence that the building offers patio/deck amenities.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Moderately strong evidence: 5 of 7 MLS records include a recreation-room amenity and multiple remarks explicitly list 'recreation room' or 'party room' (e.g., 'party room', 'recreation room'). Repeated explicit mentions across listings indicate a common shared amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence that the building offers storage units/lockers: 6 of 7 current MLS listings have the storage amenity checked and 5 of 7 list storage in unit features. Multiple agent remarks explicitly state extra storage, quoting phrases like “a separate storage closet on the same floor” and “Separate storage room located directly across unit,” indicating the feature is widely advertised across listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Implied but consistent evidence: all 7 current MLS listings include the 'trash chute' amenity, even though remarks do not explicitly state 'trash chute' or 'garbage chute'. Given the complete and consistent MLS checks and prior medium confidence, include trash-chute as a building feature with fairly high confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence the building has a pool: MLS checkbox is set on all 7 listings and multiple agent remarks explicitly mention 'pool', 'swimming pool', or 'hot tub' (quotes: 'Building amenities include: pool, jacuzzi...' and 'Amenities include swimming pool, jacuzzi...'). Mentions appear in several different listing remarks and align with historical high confidence, indicating the pool is a genuine shared amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 7 current MLS listings list washer/dryer in the inclusions, and the public remarks explicitly state "Other appliances include ... washer, dryer." Evidence is consistent across multiple listings (likely some agent copy/paste) and matches prior high-confidence data, so the building offers in-unit laundry.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Assigned parking is well-supported: 6 of 7 current listings and several remarks explicitly state assigned stalls (e.g., '2 ASSIGNED PARKING STALLS!', '1 assigned covered parking spot'). Evidence is consistent across multiple agent remarks and aligns with MLS checkbox data, indicating building-level assigned/reserved parking.
Covered parking is strongly supported: all 7 current MLS listings indicate covered parking and remarks specifically mention 'assigned covered parking spot' and 'secured, covered parking stall.' This consistent, repeated language across listings confirms the building offers covered parking.
Listings repeatedly reference assigned and secured/covered stalls but never state that parking is deeded/owned. No evidence in the remarks that stalls are part of the deed.
No analysis available
Remarks describe assigned/covered/gated parking but do not state any separate parking fee or rental cost. Parking fee cannot be determined from the remarks.
Guest parking is well-documented: 6 of 7 MLS listings list guest parking and agent remarks include direct mentions such as 'Guest parking downstairs.' The consistency across multiple listings supports inclusion of guest/visitor parking for the building.
Secured-entry parking is supported by multiple agent remarks mentioning 'gated parking' and 'one secured, covered parking stall,' and is reflected in 4 of 7 MLS checkbox entries. While not every listing repeats it, the repeated explicit language across different remarks indicates the building offers gated/secured parking access.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Remarks consistently describe assigned stalls and guest parking but do not mention any waitlist process. Absence of mention suggests no waitlist described in the public remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 6 recent MLS listings for Punahou Chalet include the ACWIUN checkbox, indicating window-type air conditioning. The public remarks for the sampled listings do not mention AC explicitly, but there is also no evidence contradicting it. Given the consistent MLS data across multiple listings and agents, it is likely that at least some units in the building have window AC units.
Current MLS checkbox data strongly indicates a concrete building (7 of 7 listings list CONCRE). None of the public remarks explicitly mention construction materials, but the consistent MLS selection across all listings and prior high-confidence history provide strong evidence that the building is constructed with concrete.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Only 1 of 7 current MLS listings has MASSTU checked and there is no historical data or any public remarks referencing masonry or stucco. Given the lack of corroborating remarks and the isolated checkbox, the masonry/stucco designation appears unlikely and is omitted pending clearer verification.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Public remarks focus on residential use, schools, and building amenities with no reference to short-term rental allowance. With no explicit allowance mentioned, STR is treated as not indicated in the remarks.
Remarks describe residential amenities (pool, jacuzzi, BBQ, gym) but do not reference any hotel rental pool program. Because STR is not indicated, hotel-pool participation is set to false.
There is no indication of a mandatory rental pool in the public remarks, and since STRs are not indicated as allowed, mandatory pool participation is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Remarks do not indicate this is a leasehold property nor provide a lease expiry year. Unable to determine lease expiry from available public remarks.
Public remarks focus on location, renovations, and amenities and do not reference VA loan eligibility. No evidence in the remarks to indicate the building is VA-approved.
I searched the remarks for insurance coverage statements (e.g., 'fully insured', 'walls-in coverage', 'full insurance') and found no references to HOA or building insurance. Therefore the listings provide no evidence to determine whether the building is fully insured by the HOA.
No analysis available
I looked for language indicating a passed fire/life safety evaluation (e.g., 'FLSE passed', 'fire life safety evaluation passed', 'passed fire inspection') but found no such statements in the public remarks. Without explicit mention, there is no evidence in these listings to confirm whether the building has passed a fire/life safety evaluation.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
At least 2 of the aggregated listings explicitly mention Diamond Head: "city views toward Diamond Head" and "views of downtown and Diamond Head." This is direct, repeated agent language across different listings, indicating some units offer Diamond Head views despite MLS checkbox absence.
Multiple listings (approximately 4 out of the aggregated entries) mention city or downtown views, with quotes such as "city views," "views of downtown," and "city views toward Diamond Head." Historical high-confidence data plus current confirming remarks make the evidence strong that the building offers city views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
MLS checkbox shows a resident/on-site manager for 7 of 7 current listings ('RESMAN' amenity checked), but none of the public remarks mention a resident manager or on-site/live-in manager. Evidence is therefore primarily the MLS amenity flag across multiple listings and appears to be copy/pasted by agents; confidence is moderate rather than high.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.