Pulelehua
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Pulelehua
Building Overview
Pulelehua in Manoa is a 1975 concrete condominium with mountain and Diamond Head views and an on-site resident manager.
About Pulelehua
Pulelehua is a condominium building located in the Manoa neighborhood. According to available records, the building was constructed in 1975 using concrete construction and offers views of the surrounding mountains and Diamond Head.
Key features include an on-site resident manager and documented views of mountain and Diamond Head. The building does not allow pets and short-term rentals are not permitted.
Parking is listed as covered and assigned, with additional guest parking available. The management company is shown as unknown in the MLS data. Based on MLS data, buyers should verify all details, including rules, fees, and management information, with the listing agent or association.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched all public remarks for explicit owner-occupancy percentages or qualifying phrases and found none. There is no current owner_occupancy percentage provided, so the percentage is unknown.
I reviewed all public remarks for explicit elevator counts or phrases indicating multiple elevators (e.g., '4 elevators', 'four elevators', 'multiple elevators') and found none. There is no current numeric elevator value provided to retain. Therefore elevator count is unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
MLS historically lists OTCOEX for the building and several listings' public remarks say 'maintenance fees incl all utilities' or 'includes ... other common expenses.' 6 of 12 listings explicitly state or imply all utilities/common expenses, indicating building-level common-area costs (e.g., hallway/elevator power) are included.
No analysis available
ELECTR is checked in MLS for all listings and 6 of 12 public remarks explicitly state or imply electricity is included (phrases: 'maintenance fee includes electricity', 'maintenance fees incl all utilities'), providing strong multi-listing confirmation.
GAS is present in most MLS listings and at least 4–6 public remarks explicitly state or imply gas is included ('includes gas', 'maintenance fees incl all utilities'), supporting inclusion as a building-level feature.
HOTWAT appears in MLS for multiple units and 1 public remark explicitly states 'maintenance fee includes ... hot water,' while several 'all utilities' remarks imply it; evidence is moderate but not as pervasive as other utilities.
No analysis available
No analysis available
SEWER is consistently present in MLS and 6 of 12 public remarks explicitly state or imply sewer is included ('maintenance fee includes ... sewer', 'water & sewer', 'all utilities'), giving strong corroboration.
WATER is checked across MLS listings and at least 6 of 12 public remarks explicitly mention or imply water is included ('maintenance fee includes water', 'maintenance fees incl all utilities'), supporting a high-confidence inclusion.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence 90%: Only 1/9 MLS entries checks a car wash amenity, and no remarks across any listing mention a car wash or vehicle wash area, suggesting a likely checkbox error rather than a true building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence is strong that the building offers patio/deck amenities: at least 9 of the listing remarks reference a lanai or private outdoor space (e.g., 'nice view of the city from the lanai', 'a lanai with city views', '50 sqft outdoor lanai', 'covered lanai', 'private outdoor space'). Mentions appear across multiple agent remarks and listings, matching historical MLS checkbox data, so include the feature for the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
MLS amenities list TRACHU in 10/12 current listings and it appeared repeatedly in prior aggregations (e.g., 9 of 11, 8 of 10, 7 of 9). None of the public remarks explicitly mention a trash/garbage/refuse chute. Given the strong, consistent presence of the TRACHU checkbox across many listings (multiple agents), the evidence implies the building likely has a trash chute, though remarks do not explicitly confirm it.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Current MLS inclusions show WASHER/DRYER for 12/12 listings, and historical data was also strongly positive (previously 11/11). At least 8 separate public remarks explicitly mention in-unit laundry with phrasing like 'in unit washer and dryer', 'washer & dryer', 'washer-dryer in the unit', and 'in-unit W/D', so evidence is strong and consistent across listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence across listings that parking stalls are assigned: at least 9 listings explicitly mention assigned or gate-assigned parking (quotes include '1 assigned covered parking stall in the basement', 'gate-assigned covered parking', 'coveted parking spot in the garage'). MLS checkbox data (11/12) and consistent agent remarks across different listings indicate this is a building-level feature.
Multiple agent remarks (at least 9 listings) explicitly reference covered or garage parking—key phrases include 'covered parking (right next to building entry)', '1 assigned covered parking stall in the basement', 'covered gated parking stall', and 'parking spot in the garage'. Combined with MLS checkbox prevalence (10/12), evidence is strong that the building offers covered parking.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No public remarks explicitly mention guest or visitor parking across these listings, but historical/current MLS parking_features have GUEST selected in multiple listings (7/11 noted). Because MLS checkbox usage suggests guest parking but remarks do not confirm it, this feature is included with moderate confidence pending direct verification.
Multiple independent listing remarks (at least 6 instances) explicitly state the parking is secured or gated: e.g., 'covered secure parking', 'secured covered parking stall', 'gate-assigned covered parking', and 'secured entry, secured parking'. This repeated language across listings indicates the building offers secured-entry parking and suggests the feature is genuine rather than a single-agent copy/paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
One of the ten current listings includes the ACWIUN inclusion (1/10 listings). None of the provided public remarks mention window or wall AC—remarks reference 'cool breezes', 'cross-breezes', and recent custom windows but do not state window air conditioners. Evidence that any units have window AC is limited to a single MLS inclusion entry, so the feature is possible but uncertain.
11 of 12 current MLS listings for this building indicate 'CONCRE' as construction material. Public remarks across the listings do not explicitly state construction type (no contradictions), and the MLS data is consistent across multiple listings/agents, so there is strong evidence the building is concrete-constructed.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence 90%: Only 1/9 listings marks MASSTU in construction_materials while the rest list only concrete, and no remarks mention masonry or stucco construction, suggesting a one-off MLS miscoding.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is no reference to any hotel rental pool, hotel management, or being part of hotel operations; additionally, str_allowed is not established as true.
No listing mentions any hotel rental pool, much less a mandatory requirement to participate; also, str_allowed is not confirmed.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
One or more public remarks explicitly state 'Building is 100% hurricane insured,' indicating comprehensive building-level insurance (walls-in coverage). Based on that explicit language in the remarks, this is recorded as true with high confidence.
No analysis available
I searched all public remarks for explicit statements that the building passed a fire/life safety evaluation (e.g., 'FLSE passed', 'fire life safety evaluation passed', 'fire safety certified') and found no such language. With no current value provided and no mentions in remarks, absence of evidence suggests it is not confirmed (medium confidence).
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listing remarks reference mountain views: e.g., 'sweeping city, mountain, & Diamond Head views', 'panoramic Diamond Head, city and mountain views', and 'beautiful views of the Koolau Mountains and Diamondhead'. At least 3 separate remarks explicitly mention mountain/Koolau/Diamond Head views, confirming the building offers mountain views across units and supporting a high confidence.
Multiple agent remarks in the current dataset explicitly cite Diamond Head views in at least 4 distinct listings, with phrases like 'Diamond Head unobstructed View.' and 'panoramic Diamond Head, city and mountain views.' This corroborates the historical MLS data (7/12 listings flagged DIAHEA) and indicates the building offers Diamond Head-view units.
City views are mentioned in multiple listings (at least 4 in the current remarks) with phrases such as 'lanai with city views', 'nice view of the city from the lanai and living room', and 'sweeping city, mountain, & Diamond Head views.' This aligns with prior MLS data (7/12 listings showing CITY) and supports including city views as a building-level feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
11 of 12 recent MLS listings explicitly list RESMAN/on-site manager as an amenity. None of the public remarks explicitly mention a resident or on-site manager, but the consistent checkbox presence across multiple agents/listings indicates the building likely has a resident manager; confidence remains high given the strong MLS consensus.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.