Pulelehua
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Pulelehua
Building Overview
Pulelehua in Manoa is a 1975 concrete condominium with mountain and Diamond Head views and an on-site resident manager.
About Pulelehua
Pulelehua is a condominium building located in the Manoa neighborhood. According to available records, the building was constructed in 1975 using concrete construction and offers views of the surrounding mountains and Diamond Head.
Key features include an on-site resident manager and documented views of mountain and Diamond Head. The building does not allow pets and short-term rentals are not permitted.
Parking is listed as covered and assigned, with additional guest parking available. The management company is shown as unknown in the MLS data. Based on MLS data, buyers should verify all details, including rules, fees, and management information, with the listing agent or association.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I examined all public remarks for explicit owner-occupancy percentages or phrases indicating the level of owner occupancy and found none. With no current value provided and no remarks to confirm or deny, the owner-occupancy percentage remains unknown and cannot be inferred.
I reviewed all public remarks for explicit elevator counts or phrases indicating multiple elevators (e.g., '4 elevators', 'four elevators', 'multiple elevators') and found none. Because there is no current numeric value provided and no remarks reference elevators, I cannot determine the number and will not guess.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
MLS association_fee_includes lists OTCOEX for the building and at least 2 of the public remarks explicitly mention 'other common expenses' or 'all utilities'. Evidence is consistent across multiple listings and likely not a single-agent copy/paste error, so common-area expenses are included.
No analysis available
Electricity/ELECTR is checked in the MLS for the building and 4 listings explicitly state 'maintenance fee includes electricity' or 'all utilities'. The evidence is strong and consistent across multiple agents/listings.
Gas appears in the MLS association_fee_includes for several units and 4 listings explicitly state 'gas' is included. Multiple confirmations across listings support including gas as part of the maintenance fee.
HOTWAT is checked in the MLS for several listings and 2 public remarks explicitly or implicitly (via 'all utilities') include hot water. Evidence is moderate across listings, so hot water is likely included but with slightly lower confidence than electricity/water/sewer.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer/SEWER is listed in the MLS association_fee_includes and 4 listings explicitly state 'sewer' is included. The consistency across MLS data and remarks indicates sewer is included in the maintenance fee.
Water/WATER is checked in the MLS for the building and at least 4 public remarks explicitly mention 'water' or 'all utilities' being included. The evidence is consistent and strong across multiple listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence 90%: Only 1/9 MLS entries checks a car wash amenity, and no remarks across any listing mention a car wash or vehicle wash area, suggesting a likely checkbox error rather than a true building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence 99%: At least 7/9 listings mention a lanai, 'outdoor lanai,' 'covered lanai,' or 'private outdoor space,' showing that units commonly have usable outdoor deck/patio-type areas.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
MLS amenities list TRACHU (trash chute) in 8 of 10 current listings and prior aggregation showed 7 of 9 with high confidence that the building has a trash chute. None of the public remarks explicitly mention trash/garbage/refuse chutes (no contradictory evidence), and multiple agents’ checkbox entries consistently include TRACHU, suggesting the building-level feature exists despite lack of remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong, consistent evidence that some units have in-unit laundry: at least 6 of the provided listing remarks explicitly mention in-unit laundry (quotes include "in unit laundry", "washer & dryer", "new front loading washer/dryer", "in-unit W/D"). This appears across multiple agent listings and matches the MLS inclusions (10/10), so the building should be listed as offering in-unit laundry.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence 99%: MLS parking_features include ASSIGN for 9/9 listings, and remarks reference '1 assigned covered parking stall' and 'gate-assigned covered parking.'
Strong evidence across listings that the building offers covered parking: at least 8 listings (current set and prior MLS flags) reference covered/garage-style parking. Key phrases include 'covered secure parking', 'secured covered parking stall', and 'assigned covered parking stall', indicating covered parking is a consistent, building-level feature rather than isolated or agent error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence 90%: Guest parking (GUEST) is selected in parking_features for 6/9 MLS listings, with no remarks contradicting its existence.
Multiple independent listing remarks (at least 6 instances) explicitly state the parking is secured or gated: e.g., 'covered secure parking', 'secured covered parking stall', 'gate-assigned covered parking', and 'secured entry, secured parking'. This repeated language across listings indicates the building offers secured-entry parking and suggests the feature is genuine rather than a single-agent copy/paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
One of the ten current listings includes the ACWIUN inclusion (1/10 listings). None of the provided public remarks mention window or wall AC—remarks reference 'cool breezes', 'cross-breezes', and recent custom windows but do not state window air conditioners. Evidence that any units have window AC is limited to a single MLS inclusion entry, so the feature is possible but uncertain.
All 10 of the current MLS listings indicate 'CONCRE' in construction_materials. Public remarks across the listings do not explicitly mention building materials, but the consistent, building-wide MLS entries (previously high confidence at 95%) provide strong evidence the building is concrete/reinforced concrete.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence 90%: Only 1/9 listings marks MASSTU in construction_materials while the rest list only concrete, and no remarks mention masonry or stucco construction, suggesting a one-off MLS miscoding.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is no reference to any hotel rental pool, hotel management, or being part of hotel operations; additionally, str_allowed is not established as true.
No listing mentions any hotel rental pool, much less a mandatory requirement to participate; also, str_allowed is not confirmed.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
One or more remarks explicitly state the building is "100% hurricane insured," which supports that the HOA carries comprehensive building-level insurance (walls-in). Prior data also indicated high confidence; no remarks contradict this, so the value remains true with high confidence.
No analysis available
I searched the public remarks for explicit statements that the building passed a fire/life safety evaluation (e.g., 'FLSE passed', 'fire life safety evaluation passed', 'passed fire inspection') and found no such language. Because there is no current value and no mentions in the remarks, per the rules absence is treated as likely false with medium confidence.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence 99%: Listings refer to 'mountain views,' 'city, mountain, & Diamond Head views,' and 'beautiful views of the Koolau Mountains,' confirming mountain outlooks from some units.
Multiple agent remarks (≈5/10 listings) explicitly cite Diamond Head views — e.g., 'Corner unit with Diamond Head views,' 'panoramic Diamond Head, city and mountain views,' and 'sweeping ... Diamond Head views from a cozy 50 sqft outdoor lanai.' Evidence is consistent across different listings and agents, so the building should be listed as offering Diamond Head views.
Confidence 99%: Several listings describe 'sweeping city views,' 'Nice view of the city from the lanai,' and 'Diamond Head, city and mountain views.'
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple recent MLS listings (9 of 10) list RESMAN as an amenity, and prior analysis gave high confidence (~90%) that a resident/on-site manager exists. None of the public remarks in the provided listings explicitly mention or contradict a resident/on-site manager, so the MLS checkbox consistency across many agents supports keeping resident_manager = true.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.