Prospect Tower Apartments
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Prospect Tower Apartments
Building Overview
Prospect Tower Apartments in Makiki-Tantalus (1971). Concrete building with ocean and Diamond Head views, pool and resident manager.
About Prospect Tower Apartments
Prospect Tower Apartments is located in the Makiki-Tantalus neighborhood and was built in 1971. According to available records the building is constructed of concrete and offers ocean and Diamond Head views. Size and unit count are not specified in the MLS data provided.
Based on MLS data, key features include a swimming pool, a resident manager, and split-system air conditioning. The building's rules state that pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not permitted.
Parking options listed in the MLS include covered, assigned parking and guest parking. The management company is shown as unknown in the available records. This summary is based on MLS data; buyers should verify all details, fees, and current policies with the listing agent or management.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
The remarks provide explicit owner-occupancy figures in multiple listings: 80% in one and 78% in another. Given the current value of 78.00 and repeated corroboration, 78% is well supported.
I searched the remarks for explicit elevator references, including counts like "4 elevators," "four elevators," or general phrases like "multiple elevators." None were mentioned, so there is no remark-based evidence to confirm the number of elevators.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
Strong, consistent evidence across listings that cable is included: MLS association_fee_includes lists CABTV in 8 of 8 records and several remarks say 'cable' or 'basic cable' is included in maintenance. Evidence appears across multiple agents/listings and is corroborated by the MLS checkbox data.
Moderate evidence that common area expenses are included: OTCOEX appears in 3 of 8 MLS records and at least one remark states 'other common expenses' are covered. The signal is present but less widespread than cable/water/hot water/sewer, so confidence is moderate.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence hot water is included: HOTWAT is present in 5 of 8 MLS records and several public remarks explicitly state 'hot water included in maint. fee.' Multiple agents repeat this feature across listings, supporting a building-level inclusion.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong, consistent evidence that sewer is included: SEWER appears in 7 of 8 MLS records and several remarks say 'sewer' is included in the maintenance fee, indicating building-level coverage across listings.
Very strong evidence water is included: WATER is listed in 8 of 8 MLS records and multiple public remarks explicitly state water is covered by the maintenance fee, consistently reported across agents and listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 8 current MLS entries include car wash (CRWSH), and public remarks explicitly list 'car wash' in the amenity list in at least one remark ('Amenities include... car wash'). The consistent MLS flags and explicit mention in remarks across agents support high confidence the building has car wash facilities.
Two of eight current MLS listings include a clubhouse/community center checkbox (CLUHOU), but none of the public remarks use terms like 'clubhouse' or 'community center.' The evidence is limited and appears inconsistent across agents, so the feature is included with moderate confidence based mainly on MLS entries.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Meeting room is explicitly mentioned in multiple public remarks (e.g., 'Property amenities include... meeting room' and 'Amenities include pool & patio... meeting room'), and 4 of 8 MLS listings check the meeting room amenity. This consistent agent language across listings yields strong confidence the building offers a meeting/conference room.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Only 1 of 8 MLS checkbox entries currently lists a recreation room (RECROO), and historical records previously indicated the feature. None of the public remarks explicitly say 'recreation room' or synonyms (rec room, game room), suggesting agent copy/paste or inconsistent reporting; evidence is limited and not broadly corroborated across agents.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence that the building offers storage units/lockers: 6 of 8 public remarks mention storage (e.g., “extra storage locker on the same floor,” “separate storage unit on the same floor,” and “(2) assigned storage units, one on the ground floor & one on the 2nd floor”). This aligns with current MLS amenity checkboxes (5/8) and prior high-confidence history, indicating a legitimate, building-level amenity rather than isolated agent copy/paste.
I searched for surfboard storage, board storage, surf storage, and bike-and-surfboard storage, but found nothing. The remarks mention general storage lockers and storage areas only.
No analysis available
All 8 current MLS listings check trash chute (TRACHU) and historical records indicate high confidence for this feature. Although none of the public remarks explicitly say 'trash chute' or synonyms, the uniform MLS reporting across multiple agents and prior data provide strong evidence the building has a trash chute system.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All current listings (8/8) explicitly mention a pool with phrases like "Amenities include pool," "the swimming pool," and "residents have access to a pool." Multiple agent remarks across different listings consistently list the pool among building amenities, indicating strong, corroborated evidence that the building has a swimming pool.
No analysis available
I looked for saltwater pool wording such as salt water, saltwater, saline, or salt pool, and found nothing. The pool is mentioned repeatedly, but its water type is not specified.
Strong evidence that some units have in-unit laundry: 8/8 current MLS listings list WASHER/DRYER in inclusions, and at least four public remarks explicitly note in-unit laundry with phrases like "half bath w/ washer/dryer", "full-size washer & dryer", and "washer and dryer inside the unit." Mentions appear across multiple listings/agents and align with historical high confidence, supporting inclusion of this feature.
No analysis available
I looked for coin laundry, coin-op, card-operated machines, quarters, or any note that community laundry requires payment, and found nothing. The remarks only reference in-unit washer/dryer in some units, not paid shared laundry.
I searched the public remarks for references to laundry on each floor, floor-by-floor laundry rooms, or similar wording and found none. The listings mention in-unit washer/dryer and storage, but nothing about community laundry facilities on every floor.
All 7 MLS entries indicate some form of parking and multiple agent remarks reference parking: 'one assigned open parking stall', 'large parking stall', and 'oversize parking stall'. Evidence is consistent across listings and supported by MLS checkbox data, indicating strong building-level parking availability.
Assigned parking is repeatedly cited across the remarks—at least 4 of the 8 listing remarks explicitly mention an assigned stall (quotes include 'one assigned open parking stall' and 'an assigned parking stall'). Historical MLS checkbox data also showed 7/8 listings with ASSIGN, and multiple agents independently mention it, indicating strong, consistent evidence for assigned parking.
One listing explicitly states 'one covered parking stall' and two MLS entries flag covered/garage-style parking. While only a minority of remarks mention covered parking, both MLS checkbox data and an explicit remark confirm that the building offers at least one covered stall, so covered parking is present though not universal.
I searched for 'deeded parking', 'owned stall', or 'parking included in deed' and found none. The listings describe assigned stalls and the option to rent a second stall, which suggests parking is not explicitly deeded in the public remarks.
No analysis available
The public remarks do state a monthly parking rental cost, but the amounts vary by listing/time. I used the most recent explicit amount mentioned in the remarks, $185 per month, since it directly describes the optional second stall rental.
Guest parking is frequently mentioned across the listings—at least 5–6 of the 8 remarks refer to guest/visitor stalls (quotes include '8 guest parking spaces' and 'this complex has several guest stalls'). Both MLS checkbox data and numerous agent remarks consistently support that guest parking is available in the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for 'parking waitlist', 'waiting list', or similar language and found nothing. The remarks instead mention assigned parking, guest parking, and the ability to rent an additional stall.
No analysis available
I searched for key card access, fob access, card reader, electronic access, and keycard entry, but found no explicit mention. The building is described as secured/secure, but that does not confirm card-based access.
No analysis available
I looked for security patrol, roving security, patrol service, or patrolled-building language and found none. The listings mention a secure building and resident/on-site manager, but not patrol service.
No analysis available
No analysis available
At least one current public remark explicitly notes 'Recently installed split A/C,' confirming ductless/mini-split systems in some units. MLS checkbox data also indicates ACSPL was selected in 3 of 8 listings historically. Evidence shows the building offers split/ductless AC in some units, so include the feature for buyers searching for mini-splits.
No analysis available
7 of 8 recent MLS listings explicitly list 'CONCRE' in construction materials, and the prior data summary gave high confidence for concrete construction. None of the public remarks explicitly describe alternative construction (masonry/stucco or slab), so the weight of consistent MLS entries across multiple agents supports concrete construction for the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Just 1 of 8 listings includes 'MASSTU' while the majority (7/8) specify concrete; none of the public remarks mention masonry or stucco. The single MASSTU entry appears isolated and inconsistent with the overall MLS pattern, so masonry/stucco construction is unlikely for this building.
No analysis available
Only 1 of 8 listings checks 'SLAB' and none of the marketing remarks mention 'concrete slab' or a slab foundation. Given the sparse and inconsistent MLS checkbox presence and lack of confirming remarks, slab foundation is not strongly supported (moderate confidence).
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for explicit STR language such as 'short-term rental allowed', 'NUC', 'TVU', or minimum-day rules, but none appeared. Because there is no evidence that STRs are allowed, this is treated as not allowed based on the remarks.
I searched for references to a hotel rental pool or hotel-managed rental program and found none. Since STR allowance was not established in the remarks, this feature is also not supported.
I looked for language such as 'mandatory hotel pool', 'required to participate', or 'cannot opt out' and found none. There is also no evidence of any rental pool program in the remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for phrases like 'lease expires', 'ground lease ends', 'leasehold expiring', or a 4-digit expiration year, but nothing was stated. Since the remarks do not identify a leasehold or any expiry date, the year remains unknown.
I searched the public remarks for explicit VA-loan approval language and found none. Because there is no current value provided and no supporting text, this is treated as not evidenced in the listings.
The remarks explicitly describe the building as "100% insured" and also state "NO MF INCREASE FOR HURRICANE INSURANCE FULL COVERAGE!" That matches the definition of fully insured/walls-in coverage very strongly.
No analysis available
I looked for references to a passed fire/life safety evaluation, FLSE, fire safety certification, or passed fire inspection. The remarks mention a new fire alarm speaker installation in one listing, but nothing states that the building passed a fire/life safety evaluation.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Strong evidence the building offers ocean views: 7 of 8 listing remarks mention ocean exposure with phrases like "spectacular city, Diamond Head, ocean and fireworks views," "partial ocean views," and "peek-a-boo ocean views." The ocean view is cited across multiple agent remarks and unit types, so buyers seeking ocean-view units would find this building relevant.
No listings reference mountain or mauka views (0 of 8 remarks), while many remarks repeat city and ocean exposures. Given the absence of any mountain/Koolau/mauka mentions in remarks or current MLS view fields, it is very likely the building does not offer mountain views.
Diamond Head views are explicitly mentioned in one high-floor 3-bedroom remark: "spectacular city, Diamond Head, ocean and fireworks views." While only referenced in a subset of listings (1 of 8), that specific listing markets Diamond Head exposure clearly, so the building should be listed as offering Diamond Head views.
City views are pervasive across listings: 8 of 8 remarks describe city or skyline exposure with phrases like "spectacular city," "sweeping city views," and "view of the city of Honolulu." The consistency across multiple agent remarks indicates strong, building-level city views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks explicitly state that units have fireworks views from the lanai/unit. This is direct evidence of a view, not merely proximity to fireworks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence the building has a resident/on-site manager: 5 of 8 recent listing remarks explicitly state an on-site or resident manager (quotes include "on-site manager" and "on-site resident manager"). Historical MLS checkbox data also shows RESMAN in all 8 listings, and the mentions appear across different listings/agents rather than a single copy-paste, supporting a high-confidence true value.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.