Prospect Tower Apartments
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Prospect Tower Apartments
Building Overview
Prospect Tower Apartments in Makiki-Tantalus (1971). Concrete building with ocean and Diamond Head views, pool and resident manager.
About Prospect Tower Apartments
Prospect Tower Apartments is located in the Makiki-Tantalus neighborhood and was built in 1971. According to available records the building is constructed of concrete and offers ocean and Diamond Head views. Size and unit count are not specified in the MLS data provided.
Based on MLS data, key features include a swimming pool, a resident manager, and split-system air conditioning. The building's rules state that pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not permitted.
Parking options listed in the MLS include covered, assigned parking and guest parking. The management company is shown as unknown in the available records. This summary is based on MLS data; buyers should verify all details, fees, and current policies with the listing agent or management.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
A remark explicitly gives a numeric owner-occupancy rate of 78%, and other remarks describe the building as highly owner occupied. Use the stated 78% with high confidence.
The public remarks never reference elevators or number of elevators. With no current numeric value available and no explicit statements in the remarks, the number of elevators is unknown and cannot be inferred.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
Strong evidence across listings that cable is included: MLS association_fee_includes lists CABTV in 7/7 records and remarks explicitly state 'Hot water & cable is included in the maintenance fee' and 'maintenance fees cover basic cable'. The inclusion appears consistent across multiple agents and listings, indicating a building-level inclusion of cable.
A listing explicitly says fees cover 'other common expenses,' and 3 of 7 MLS records mark OTCOEX in association_fee_includes, indicating that shared building operating costs are included. While not spelled out as 'common area electricity,' the pattern strongly implies common-area utilities are part of the maintenance fees.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple agents across at least 4 listings clearly note 'hot water included in maint. fee' or similar language, indicating a central hot water system covered by HOA dues. This is corroborated by HOTWAT appearing in 5 of 7 association_fee_includes entries, so building-supplied hot water is very likely included in fees.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence that sewer is included: MLS association_fee_includes lists SEWER in 6/7 records and remarks explicitly state 'maintenance fees cover...sewer' and reference AOAO sewer line replumbing. Multiple listings and agent remarks corroborate association-level sewer coverage.
Strong evidence that water is included: MLS association_fee_includes lists WATER in 7/7 records and remarks explicitly state 'maintenance fees cover...water' and 'hot water included in maint. fee.' The consistency across multiple listings indicates building-level water coverage.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The building is repeatedly listed with car wash in the amenities (MLS shows CRWSH across listings) and at least one public remark explicitly says 'car wash' ('Amenities include ... car wash'), supporting inclusion of the feature.
No public remarks mention a clubhouse or community center, and only 1 of 7 current MLS entries lists CLUHOU. Given the lack of corroborating agent remarks but a single MLS checkbox, the existence of a clubhouse is possible but not well supported across listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Several listings explicitly state 'meeting room' or list a meeting/conference room in the amenities (e.g., 'Property amenities include... meeting room' and 'Amenities include pool & patio for sunbathing, BBQ, meeting room...'), showing consistent confirmation across agents.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across all listings, agents consistently highlight amenities such as pool, BBQ, garden area, storage, and meeting room but never mention a recreation or game room. With only 1 of 7 MLS records checking this box and no textual support, this appears to be a mistaken checkbox rather than a real building feature. It is very likely the building does not offer a dedicated recreation room.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Five of seven listings explicitly mention storage as an amenity, using phrases like 'extra storage locker on the same floor', 'storage area', 'separate storage unit on the same floor', and '(2) assigned storage units'. These references appear in different units’ remarks and align with MLS amenities data, strongly confirming that the building offers storage units/lockers to residents.
Searched for 'surfboard storage', 'board storage', and 'surf storage' as well as combined bike/surfboard storage; none were found. Existing storage appears to be general-purpose rather than dedicated surfboard storage.
No analysis available
No public remarks explicitly state 'trash chute', but all MLS listings list TRACHU and historical data had high confidence. The consistent MLS checkbox across listings strongly implies a building trash chute system.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All current MLS listings (7/7) indicate a pool and multiple agent remarks explicitly mention a pool or swimming pool, using phrases like "the building offers... a pool", "Property amenities include the swimming pool", and "Amenities include pool & patio." Evidence is consistent across several listings and agents, indicating the building-level amenity is very likely accurate.
No analysis available
Searched for 'salt water pool', 'saltwater', and 'saline pool' in conjunction with the pool description and found no such references. The pool is therefore assumed not to be saltwater based on available remarks.
All 7 current MLS entries list WASHER/DRYER in the inclusions, and at least three public remarks explicitly note in-unit laundry—phrases include "full-size washer & dryer" and "comes with a washer and dryer inside the unit." Evidence is strong and consistent across multiple listings and agents, so the building should be marked as offering in-unit laundry.
No analysis available
Looked for phrases such as 'coin-op laundry', 'card-operated laundry', and 'paid laundry' but none appeared. Since only in-unit washers/dryers are mentioned, paid community laundry is unlikely.
Remarks emphasize that units have their own washer/dryer and never mention community laundry facilities on any floor. Searched for terms like 'laundry on each floor' and 'community laundry room' but found none, so this feature is likely not present.
All 7 MLS entries indicate some form of parking and multiple agent remarks reference parking: 'one assigned open parking stall', 'large parking stall', and 'oversize parking stall'. Evidence is consistent across listings and supported by MLS checkbox data, indicating strong building-level parking availability.
Assigned parking is repeatedly cited: remarks include phrases like 'one assigned open parking stall', 'an assigned parking stall', and other listings note an 'assigned parking stall'. Combined with 6/7 MLS entries checked ASSIGN, the evidence strongly supports assigned parking in the building.
One listing specifies 'one covered parking stall', and two MLS entries flag covered/garage-style parking. Even if some stalls are open, the presence of covered stalls in the building means covered parking is available to at least some units.
I searched for explicit wording like 'deeded parking' or 'owned stall' but only found 'assigned' and 'rented' references. 'Assigned' alone does not confirm deeded status, so deeded is set to false with low-to-medium confidence.
No analysis available
The public remarks explicitly note a monthly rental fee for an additional parking stall of $125/month, so the monthly parking fee for an extra stall is 125 with high confidence.
Guest parking is mentioned across several remarks—'rare guest parking', 'There is guest parking available', and 'this complex has several guest stalls'—and 6/7 MLS entries indicate guest parking. The consistency across agents and listings supports inclusion of guest parking.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for terms like 'parking waitlist' or 'join waitlist' and found none. The language implies availability rather than a formal waitlist, so a formal waitlist is reported as false with low-to-medium confidence.
No analysis available
Looked for terms like 'key card access', 'fob entry', 'card reader', and 'electronic access' but found none. While the building is secured, the specific presence of a card/fob system is not supported by the remarks.
No analysis available
Remarks discuss security and an on-site/resident manager but do not refer to any roving or patrol-style security service. Absence of such terms suggests there is no dedicated security patrol.
No analysis available
No analysis available
At least one listing’s public remarks explicitly note a "Recently installed split A/C," confirming that mini-split systems are present in some units. Additionally, 3 of 7 current MLS listings check the ACSPL inclusion, reinforcing that split AC is available in the building. Buyers seeking units with split AC should consider this building as it appears to allow and feature these systems in some apartments.
No analysis available
Six of seven recent MLS listings for Prospect Tower Apts explicitly list 'CONCRE' in construction materials, supporting concrete construction. None of the public remarks mention an alternate construction type or recent change; remarks focus on views, amenities, and unit condition. Given the strong and consistent MLS checkbox usage across multiple listings and no contradictory remarks, the building is reported as concrete construction.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The MLS pattern (1/7 MASSTU vs. 6/7 CONCRE) plus the complete absence of any masonry/stucco references in remarks strongly suggests the building is classified as concrete, not masonry and stucco. The lone MASSTU selection is most plausibly a mis‑click or copy‑paste mistake, so masonry/stucco construction is not treated as a building feature here.
No analysis available
Although only 1 of 7 listings explicitly checks SLAB and no remarks mention the foundation, Prospect Tower Apts is a concrete high‑rise, which almost always sits on a concrete slab or mat foundation. The combination of one MLS slab indication and typical construction practice supports treating a concrete slab foundation as present, albeit with moderate confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for explicit STR-permission language (e.g., 'short-term rental allowed', 'vacation rental') and found none. Given the absence of STR-related remarks and the residential marketing, STR is reported as not allowed with medium confidence.
Because short-term rentals are not indicated and there is no mention of any hotel rental pool or hotel-managed program, hotel pool participation is set to false with high confidence.
With no evidence of an STR program or hotel rental pool in the remarks, there is no basis for a mandatory pool requirement; this is reported as false with high confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for explicit leasehold language and a 4-digit lease expiry year (e.g., 'lease expires 2050', 'land lease to 2065') and found no such statements. Because no year is provided in the public remarks, the lease expiry is unknown.
I searched the public remarks for explicit VA loan language (e.g., 'VA approved', 'VA financing', 'VA loans accepted') and found none. With no current verified value present in the remarks, this is reported as false with medium confidence.
Remarks explicitly advertise full hurricane insurance coverage (walls-in/full coverage). This matches the definition of fully insured by the HOA, so set to true with high confidence.
No analysis available
No public remarks explicitly state that the building has passed a fire/life safety evaluation (FLSE) or similar phrase. I searched for 'fire life safety evaluation', 'FLSE passed', 'passed fire inspection', 'fire safety certified', and related terms and found no explicit confirmation, so FLSE pass is not indicated.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Multiple independent remarks describe ocean exposure, including 'spectacular city, Diamond Head, ocean and fireworks views', 'peek-a-boo ocean views', and 'City and Ocean views.' Although only 3/7 MLS records check the ocean-view box, 6/7 remarks clearly advertise ocean views, suggesting agents sometimes omit the checkbox but consistently market the feature.
Across 7 current listings, 0 mention mountain/Koolau/mauka views while multiple listings explicitly state 'city and partial ocean views', 'peek-a-boo ocean views', and 'city lights'. Evidence is consistent across different agent remarks and marketing copy, with no listings indicating mountain views, so it is very unlikely the building offers mountain views.
A 3-bedroom high-floor unit is specifically marketed with 'Diamond Head' views, which is unlikely to be a mistake given the prominence of that landmark. Even though agents did not check a Diamond Head box in MLS, this explicit remark confirms that some units in the building enjoy Diamond Head views.
Every remark emphasizes city exposure with phrases like 'sweeping city views,' 'spectacular view of the city of Honolulu,' and 'City and Ocean views.' With 4/7 MLS records also checking CITY, there is strong, building-wide evidence of city views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks explicitly note fireworks views from a high-floor unit/lanai in this building. This directly confirms that residents can view fireworks from the property.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence the building has a resident/on-site manager: at least 5 of the 7 listing remarks explicitly mention an on-site or resident manager (quotes include "the building offers an on-site manager", "on-site resident manager", and "amenities include ... on-site manager"). This is consistent across multiple agents and matches the MLS RESMAN checkbox present on all current listings, so confidence is high.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.