Prospect Tower Apartments
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Prospect Tower Apartments
Building Overview
Prospect Tower Apartments in Makiki-Tantalus (1971). Concrete building with ocean and Diamond Head views, pool and resident manager.
About Prospect Tower Apartments
Prospect Tower Apartments is located in the Makiki-Tantalus neighborhood and was built in 1971. According to available records the building is constructed of concrete and offers ocean and Diamond Head views. Size and unit count are not specified in the MLS data provided.
Based on MLS data, key features include a swimming pool, a resident manager, and split-system air conditioning. The building's rules state that pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not permitted.
Parking options listed in the MLS include covered, assigned parking and guest parking. The management company is shown as unknown in the available records. This summary is based on MLS data; buyers should verify all details, fees, and current policies with the listing agent or management.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
Owner occupancy is directly provided in the remarks, with listings citing both 80% and 78%. Given the current value of 78.00 and repeated explicit mentions, 78% is well supported.
I searched the public remarks for explicit elevator references, including any elevator count or general phrases indicating multiple elevators. Nothing was mentioned, so the elevator count remains unknown from these listings.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
Cable TV inclusion is strongly supported. Historical MLS data shows CABTV in all 9/9 current listings, and multiple remarks explicitly state that maintenance fees cover cable. This looks consistent across listings rather than a one-off agent note.
Common-area expenses appear to be included, but the evidence is weaker than for the other fee items. Current MLS data shows OTCOEX in 4/9 listings, and one public remark says maintenance fees cover 'other common expenses.' That supports inclusion, though it may partly reflect broader common expenses rather than specifically common-area electricity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Hot water inclusion is strongly confirmed. Historical MLS data shows HOTWAT in 6/9 listings, and the remarks repeatedly state that maintenance fees cover hot water. There is also one WTRHTR-related inclusion, but the overall evidence still points to building-supplied hot water being included.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer is consistently included in the maintenance fee. Current MLS data shows SEWER in 8/9 listings, and public remarks explicitly state that fees cover sewer. The repeated references across listings suggest this is building-level and not just copy-paste noise.
Water is clearly included in the maintenance fee. Historical MLS data shows WATER in 9/9 listings, and at least one remark explicitly lists water among the covered costs. This is highly consistent across the listings and agents.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence supports car wash as a building amenity. One public remark explicitly says the amenities include "car wash," and the current MLS data shows 9/9 listings checked for CRWSH. This matches the historical high-confidence signal and looks consistent across listings rather than a one-off error.
Two of eight current MLS listings include a clubhouse/community center checkbox (CLUHOU), but none of the public remarks use terms like 'clubhouse' or 'community center.' The evidence is limited and appears inconsistent across agents, so the feature is included with moderate confidence based mainly on MLS entries.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Meeting room is explicitly mentioned in multiple public remarks (e.g., 'Property amenities include... meeting room' and 'Amenities include pool & patio... meeting room'), and 4 of 8 MLS listings check the meeting room amenity. This consistent agent language across listings yields strong confidence the building offers a meeting/conference room.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Only 1 of 8 MLS checkbox entries currently lists a recreation room (RECROO), and historical records previously indicated the feature. None of the public remarks explicitly say 'recreation room' or synonyms (rec room, game room), suggesting agent copy/paste or inconsistent reporting; evidence is limited and not broadly corroborated across agents.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage is clearly available in this building. Across the provided remarks, at least 5 listings explicitly mention storage, including phrases like "storage locker on the same floor," "separate storage unit on the same floor," and "(2) assigned storage units." The evidence is consistent across multiple agents and aligns with the prior MLS data showing storage in building amenities/unit features.
I searched for surfboard storage, board storage, surf storage, and bike-and-surfboard storage and found nothing. The remarks do mention general storage lockers and storage units, but not surfboard-specific storage.
No analysis available
Trash chute remains supported by the MLS records: 9/9 current listings include TRACHU. None of the public remarks explicitly mention a trash chute, but there is also no contradictory evidence or indication that the feature was removed, so the high-confidence historical status stands.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The building clearly has a shared pool amenity. 7+ of the current remarks explicitly mention it with phrases like "Amenities include pool," "the swimming pool," "property amenities include the swimming pool," and "residents have access to a pool." This is consistent with the historical MLS data showing pool-related amenities on all current listings, so confidence is very high.
No analysis available
I looked for salt water pool wording such as saltwater, saline, or salt pool and found nothing. The pool is mentioned repeatedly, but its water type is never specified.
Strong evidence that the building offers in-unit laundry. At least 3–4 public remarks explicitly say the unit has washer/dryer or washer and dryer inside the unit, and current MLS inclusions show WASHER/DRYER in 9/9 listings. The consistency across multiple listings suggests this is not a copy-paste error and should be treated as a confirmed building feature.
No analysis available
I looked for coin laundry, coin-op, card-operated machines, quarters, or any note that community laundry is paid and found nothing. The remarks only reference washer/dryer in some units, which does not confirm a paid community laundry setup.
I searched the public remarks for wording like laundry on every floor, floor-by-floor laundry rooms, or similar community laundry references and found none. The listings mention in-unit washer/dryer and storage, but nothing about laundry facilities on each floor.
All 7 MLS entries indicate some form of parking and multiple agent remarks reference parking: 'one assigned open parking stall', 'large parking stall', and 'oversize parking stall'. Evidence is consistent across listings and supported by MLS checkbox data, indicating strong building-level parking availability.
Assigned parking is strongly supported across the listing remarks, with explicit mentions such as "one assigned open parking stall" and an "assigned parking stall." This appears consistently across multiple listings rather than a one-off copy-paste note, so the building should be treated as offering assigned/reserved parking.
Covered parking is directly confirmed in the remarks, including the phrase "one covered parking stall." Although fewer listings mention it than assigned or guest parking, the explicit wording supports that the building offers covered parking for at least some units.
I searched for language like "deeded parking," "owned stall," or "parking included in deed" and found none. The remarks describe assigned/covered parking and rental of a second stall, which suggests parking access but not deeded ownership.
No analysis available
The remarks give a clear monthly parking cost for the additional stall. Earlier remarks also mention $125/month, but the most recent explicit amount is $185/month, so that is the value used.
Guest parking is repeatedly and explicitly confirmed across multiple listings. Phrases like "8 guest parking spaces," "rare guest parking," and "guest parking available" suggest this is a building-level feature rather than a one-listing anomaly.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for "parking waitlist," "waiting list," or similar language and found nothing. The remarks instead say there is an option to rent a second stall, but do not indicate any waitlist system.
No analysis available
I searched for key card access, fob access, card reader, electronic access, and keycard entry, but found no explicit mention. The remarks do say the building is secure and has secured entry, but that is not enough to confirm a card-based system.
No analysis available
I looked for security patrol, roving security, patrol service, or patrolled-building language and found none. The listings mention a secure building and an on-site resident manager, but not patrol service.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Current public remarks explicitly mention split AC in 2 listings, including the exact phrase 'Recently installed split A/C.' Combined with prior MLS data showing 4/9 listings checked for ACSPL, this supports that some units in Prospect Tower Apts have split/ductless AC. The repeated wording across remarks suggests a real building feature rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
No analysis available
Strong building-level evidence supports concrete construction. 8 of 9 current MLS listings list CONCRE, and none of the public remarks suggest a different construction type. This looks like consistent MLS data rather than a one-off agent copy/paste issue.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Masonry/stucco appears in a minority of the listings: 2 of 9 current MLS records. No remarks explicitly mention masonry or stucco, so this looks like a weaker MLS indicator rather than something confirmed by marketing text. Included because some building records do show it, but confidence is only moderate.
No analysis available
Slab foundation is only lightly supported in the MLS data, with 2 of 9 listings showing SLAB. None of the public remarks mention a slab foundation or concrete slab specifically. This is a weak but present MLS signal, so confidence is low-to-moderate.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for explicit short-term rental language such as "STR allowed," "NUC," "TVU," or hotel-style vacation rental terms, and found none. The remarks only mention rental in a general sense, so STR permission is not supported and is treated as not allowed based on the available text.
I searched for references to a hotel pool, hotel program, or branded rental management and found none. Since STR allowance is not established in the remarks, hotel-pool participation is also not supported.
I looked for language indicating a mandatory hotel rental program or required pool participation and found nothing. There is also no evidence of any optional or mandatory rental-pool structure in the remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for phrases like "lease expires," "ground lease ends," "leasehold expiring," or any 4-digit lease-end year, but nothing was stated. Since the remarks do not provide a lease expiration date, this stays unknown.
I searched the public remarks for explicit VA-loan approval language such as "VA approved" or "VA financing" and found none. With no supporting text, this remains unconfirmed and is treated as not evidenced in the remarks.
The remarks clearly and repeatedly indicate full building insurance coverage. Phrases like "100% insured" and "FULL COVERAGE" are direct matches for fully insured/walls-in coverage.
No analysis available
I looked for direct evidence that the building passed a fire/life safety evaluation or fire inspection. The remarks only mention new fire alarm speakers and do not state any pass/certification, so this is treated as not evidenced in the remarks.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Ocean views are strongly supported across the listings. At least 7 of 9 current MLS records include OCEAN in the view descriptions, and several remarks explicitly say “spectacular city, Diamond Head, ocean and fireworks views” or “peek of the ocean.” This looks consistent across multiple agents rather than a one-off copy-paste.
Mountain-type views have moderate support, but the wording is less direct than for ocean or city views. One remark references “lush, green Punchbowl views,” and current MLS data shows 3 of 9 listings with MOUNTA in the view descriptions. This suggests some units offer mountain/landform views, but the evidence is not as explicit or pervasive.
Diamond Head views are clearly supported. The listings explicitly mention “Diamond Head” in the view context, and current MLS data shows 2 of 9 listings with DIAHEA in view descriptions. This is enough to confidently keep the feature as available in the building.
City views are overwhelmingly supported. Eight of nine current MLS records include CITY in the view descriptions, and the remarks repeatedly use phrases such as “spectacular city views,” “sweeping city views,” and “city and partial ocean views.” The evidence is consistent across multiple listings and agents.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks directly say units have fireworks views, which satisfies the requirement that fireworks are visible from the building/unit. This is repeated in multiple listings and is strong direct evidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence the building has a resident/on-site manager: 5 of 8 recent listing remarks explicitly state an on-site or resident manager (quotes include "on-site manager" and "on-site resident manager"). Historical MLS checkbox data also shows RESMAN in all 8 listings, and the mentions appear across different listings/agents rather than a single copy-paste, supporting a high-confidence true value.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.