Pokai Bay Beach Cabanas
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Pokai Bay Beach Cabanas
Building Overview
Pokai Bay Beach Cabanas, Waianae Coast — concrete building (1961) with ocean and sunset views and an on-site resident manager.
About Pokai Bay Beach Cabanas
Pokai Bay Beach Cabanas is a condominium property located on the Waianae Coast. According to available records the building was constructed in 1961 of concrete construction. Size details for units or the building footprint are not provided in the MLS data available here.
Based on MLS data, notable features include ocean, mountain and sunset views, and an on-site resident manager listed as an amenity. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS records.
Additional details from the MLS indicate parking is available. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed per the provided data. Buyers should verify all details, including fees, unit sizes, management arrangements and current policies, with the listing agent or association, as this summary is based solely on MLS-derived information.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit owner-occupancy percentages or phrases indicating a quantifiable rate and found none. While the remarks reference investment use and a Section 8 tenant (suggesting rental activity), there is no numerical owner-occupancy data, so the percentage is unknown and cannot be inferred.
I searched all public remarks for explicit references to elevators (e.g., '4 elevators', 'multiple elevators', 'elevator access') and found none. Because there is no explicit statement and no prior numeric value provided, the number of elevators is unknown and cannot be inferred from the remarks.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Association data for 5 of 9 current listings shows OTCOEX (other/common electricity) in the fee inclusions, and no remarks contradict this. While no agent explicitly writes that common area electricity is included, the repeated MLS checkbox across multiple listings suggests it is building-standard rather than a one-off error. Given the pattern and typical condo practices, this is treated as likely but with medium confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
9 out of 9 listings show SEWER in the association_fee_includes field, indicating a consistent building-wide inclusion rather than agent error. One public remark explicitly notes that 'Amenities include water, sewer, standard cable, internet,' directly tying sewer service to what the building provides through the fees. This combination of unanimous MLS data and explicit textual confirmation supports a high-confidence conclusion that sewer is included in the maintenance fees.
Every one of the 9 listings lists WATER under association_fee_includes, showing consistent treatment across agents and units. Additionally, a remark explicitly states that 'Amenities include water, sewer, standard cable, internet,' which strongly indicates that water service is provided through the HOA/maintenance fee. With both unanimous MLS data and clear remark language, there is high confidence that water is included in the building’s maintenance fees.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the public remarks for surfboard, board, or bike+surfboard storage references and found none. Because there is no evidence in the listing text, this feature is set to false with medium confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The building context lists pool=False, and I found no references to a pool or a salt/saltwater pool in the public remarks. Per rules, I kept the current value (no pool) but with low confidence since remarks do not explicitly address pools.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I scanned the remarks for indications of paid laundry (coin-op, card reader, quarters, laundromat, etc.) and found none. Because there is no evidence in the public remarks, this is set to false with medium confidence.
I searched the public remarks for phrases like 'laundry on each floor', 'laundry room on every floor', and 'floor-by-floor laundry' and found no references. With no evidence and no existing confirmed value, absence is likely; therefore set to false with medium confidence.
Across 9 current MLS listings for this building, every listing’s parking_features field indicates available parking (open/covered/garage/assigned) and none indicate no parking. Although the public remarks never call out parking specifically, there are no comments suggesting a lack of parking, and the uniform MLS metadata from multiple agents strongly supports that the building provides parking options for residents.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched for terms like 'deeded parking', 'owned stall', or 'parking included in deed' and found no references. No evidence the parking is deeded.
No analysis available
Looked for explicit parking fees or monthly parking charges and found none. No data to determine a parking fee from the public remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched for parking waitlist language and found none. No evidence in the remarks that the building uses a parking waitlist system.
No analysis available
I searched for terms indicating card/fob access (keycard, fob, card reader, electronic access) and found none. With no evidence in the public remarks and no existing confirmed value, this is set to false with medium confidence.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit references to security patrol or roving/patrolled services and found none. Given the absence of such statements in the remarks, this is set to false with medium confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All nine reviewed listings for this building mark concrete (CONCRE) in the MLS construction materials field. No remarks mention any alternative primary structure, so this appears to be a consistent, building-level characteristic rather than a copy error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Masonry/stucco construction is checked in fewer than half of the MLS entries and is never mentioned in remarks, while concrete is consistently flagged on all listings. This pattern suggests MASSTU is likely an inconsistent or mistaken checkbox choice rather than a confirmed building-wide construction type.
No analysis available
Five of nine listings identify SLAB in the construction_materials field, and this matches expected practice for a concrete beachfront condo building. Although remarks do not spell out the foundation type, the MLS pattern and typical local construction strongly support a concrete slab foundation.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Only two of nine listings mark the 'above ground' construction code, with no supporting language in any remarks. Because the majority of agents do not select this field and it is not described textually, it is likely not a reliable, intended construction descriptor for this building.
Brick appears in less than half of the MLS records (4/9) and never in the public remarks, while concrete is consistently selected on all listings. Given the local construction norms and the inconsistent MLS usage, brick construction is very likely not a true characteristic of this building.
No analysis available
While the remarks promote renting and investment use, they do not explicitly indicate that short-term/vacation rentals are permitted or legal. No explicit STR allowance found in public remarks.
Searched for 'hotel rental pool', 'hotel rental program', or hotel management mentions and found none. Because STR is not indicated, hotel pool participation is set to false.
No evidence of a hotel rental pool or language like 'mandatory' or 'required to participate' in the public remarks. As STR is not indicated, mandatory pool participation is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The public remarks repeatedly call this a 'fee simple condo', so leasehold/land-lease does not apply. No lease expiry year found or relevant.
Searched the remarks for phrases like 'VA approved', 'VA financing', or 'VA loans accepted' and found none. No evidence in the remarks to indicate VA loan approval.
The public remarks do not mention HOA or building insurance coverage or any 'walls-in' or 'fully insured' language. With no explicit statement in the remarks and no verified current value, the feature is set to false with medium confidence.
No analysis available
I reviewed the remarks for explicit statements that the building passed a fire/life safety evaluation (FLSE) or similar inspections and found none. In the absence of any mention and with no prior verified value, I defaulted to false with medium confidence per the rules (absence of mention likely means no claim).
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
At least four listings explicitly describe ocean views from units (e.g., "breathtaking ocean and sunset views" and "Full and unobstructed ocean and sunset views") and others call the building oceanfront/beachfront on Pokai Bay. This shows that some units in the building clearly have ocean views, even if MLS checkbox usage is inconsistent. Buyers seeking ocean-view units would be interested in this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings emphasize that the building is oceanfront/beachfront on Pokai Bay with surf, sand, and water activities directly in front of the units. This oceanfront bay setting strongly suggests that some units enjoy views of the coastline/shoreline in addition to open water, even though agents have not been checking the specific COASTL box in MLS.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
At least three listings clearly advertise sunset views from the property, such as "breathtaking ocean and sunset views" and "Full and unobstructed ocean and sunset views." The building is on Oahu’s west side fronting Pokai Bay, which is consistent with sunset exposure, so buyers looking for sunset views should consider this building.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit statements such as 'fireworks view', 'watch fireworks from lanai', or 'see fireworks from unit' and found none. The listing emphasizes ocean, mountain and sunset views but does not claim fireworks views, so this is set to false with medium confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence strongly supports that the building has an on-site resident manager. One listing explicitly notes 'an on-site resident manager' in the amenities, and 7 of 9 current MLS listings have the resident manager amenity checked. This consistency across both remarks and checkbox data from multiple agents indicates the feature is real and building-wide.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.