Pohakala at Mehana
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Pohakala at Mehana
Building Overview
Pohakala at Mehana in Makakilo-Kapolei-Honokai Hale — built 2017; pets and short-term rentals not allowed.
About Pohakala at Mehana
Pohakala at Mehana is a residential building located in the Makakilo-Kapolei-Honokai Hale neighborhood. According to available records, the building was completed in 2017. MLS-provided data does not specify unit sizes, total number of units, or construction type for this property.
Based on MLS data, the building has explicit use policies: pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not permitted. No additional amenities or common area features are listed in the available MLS information.
Management company, parking arrangements, homeowners association fees, and other operational details are not specified in the MLS data. Buyers should verify all building features, policies, fees, and occupancy rules with the listing agent or association before making decisions; this summary is based solely on the MLS data provided.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
The listings discuss VA loan assumptions, rentals/flex use, and community features but provide no numeric or qualitative owner-occupancy information. Without explicit data, the owner-occupancy percentage is unknown.
The remarks describe two-story townhomes with garages, stairs, and ground-floor/upper-floor layouts but never reference elevators. Because elevator counts must be explicitly stated, the number of elevators in this building remains unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Common-area electricity appears to be included in the association fee based on MLS checkbox data: 13/20 current listings include OTCOEX. The public remarks do not explicitly mention common electric, so this is driven mainly by the repeated MLS data rather than copy-paste language in remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings indicate hot water is included in association fees, and the historical pattern is reinforced by 19/20 listings showing WTRHTR in unit inclusions. There are no public remarks describing hot water as an HOA-covered utility, so this appears consistently absent rather than a copy-paste artifact.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer is described as sub-metered and billed separately in the remarks, with wording such as 'Water/Sewer fees to be added onto the HOA statement' and 'Sewer/Water are sub metered.' That strongly suggests sewer is not included in maintenance fees, despite 10/20 current MLS listings showing SEWER in association_fee_includes.
Water appears to be sub-metered and added onto the HOA statement, so it is not included in the maintenance fee. This is supported by repeated remarks across multiple listings, even though 10/20 current MLS records list WATER in association_fee_includes.
Several listings mention BBQ amenities directly, including 'BBQ area' and 'host BBQs in your expanded private courtyard.' The repeated references across multiple remarks support that this is a shared building/community amenity and not just a stray checkbox.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple remarks explicitly reference a clubhouse or community activity center (e.g., "club house", "Mehana Activity Center (MAC)"), and MLS checkbox frequency (7/20) aligns with agent descriptions, supporting inclusion of a clubhouse.
No analysis available
Dog park access is mentioned in many of the remarks, often alongside the Mehana community amenities. The repeated language ('dedicated dog park,' 'dog park,' 'dog parks') across multiple listings strongly confirms the feature.
No analysis available
Evidence is strong across the listings: at least 3 remarks explicitly mention a gym/fitness center/exercise room, including the phrases 'well-equipped gym/exercise room' and 'fitness center.' This matches the historically high-confidence MLS data and does not appear to be a one-off agent copy/paste error.
No analysis available
Several listing remarks explicitly note meeting or party rooms (phrases: "meeting/party rooms", "meeting room"), corroborated by MLS entries (6/20). This indicates the community provides meeting/conference-type room(s).
Strong evidence the building offers patio/deck-type outdoor spaces. Multiple listings mention it explicitly, with phrases like "relaxing patio/deck," "57 sq. ft. lanai," "front lanai," "covered lanai," "private covered lanai," and "balcony," across different agents and property types. This looks consistent rather than a one-off copy-paste, and it aligns with the historical MLS amenity data.
Multiple listings explicitly reference path amenities, including 'walking/jogging paths,' 'meandering walking paths,' and 'walking/bike paths.' The consistency across several remarks indicates this is a real shared community feature.
No analysis available
Strong evidence this building offers private yard space: at least 9–12 remark blocks explicitly mention yard access (quotes include 'small fenced yard', 'large open yard in front', 'private fenced yard', 'large private yard'). Multiple agents across different listings reference fenced or private yards and several MLS records include the PRIYAR amenity, indicating the feature is broadly available rather than a single-unit anomaly.
No analysis available
Many listings reference community recreation areas (phrases: "playground/rec area", "recreation center with pool", "open field"). Combined with MLS entries (10/20), this indicates the building/community provides general recreation areas and playgrounds.
Moderate-strong evidence: roughly 6-9 listings reference a recreation/meeting/activity space (quotes include 'rec room', 'Mehana Activity Center (MAC) ... meeting/party rooms', 'recreation center with pool'). Mentions come from multiple listings/agents and align with prior medium confidence, so the building-level recreation room/activity center is included.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings reference storage: 3/20 have a building-level storage checkbox and 7/20 list storage in unit_features, and public remarks across the corpus explicitly mention "storage," "custom built in storage," "plenty of storage spaces," and garage shelving. Evidence indicates the building offers storage/lockers or notable in-unit/garage storage for some units; references appear across different agent remarks rather than being a single copy/paste entry, so inclusion is warranted though not every listing notes it.
I looked for surfboard storage and similar phrases like board storage, surf storage, or bike and surfboard storage. The listings mention general storage and garage shelving, but nothing specifically indicates surfboard storage.
No analysis available
None of the provided public remarks reference a trash chute (no mentions of "trash chute" or "garbage chute"). Only 2 of 20 MLS entries have TRACHU checked, which may be agent checkbox inconsistency; evidence is lacking, so trash chute is presumed absent but with moderate confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong, repeated evidence across many listings shows this building/community offers a pool. Roughly 10+ of the provided remarks explicitly mention a pool, including phrases like "resort-style pool," "community pool," and "80 foot pool," which aligns with the historically checked MLS amenity. This appears to be consistent across multiple agents rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
No analysis available
I searched for terms like salt water pool, saltwater pool, salt pool, and saline pool. The listings confirm a community pool, but do not indicate that it is salt water.
Strong evidence confirms in-unit laundry for this building. Current MLS inclusions show washer/dryer in 20 of 20 listings, and many independent remarks repeat that units have washer/dryer in the unit, an upstairs laundry area, or a dedicated laundry room. This is consistent across multiple agents and appears to be a stable building feature, not just copy-paste MLS checkbox data.
No analysis available
I looked for paid laundry indicators such as coin laundry, card-operated machines, quarters, coin-op wording, or laundry fees. The remarks only reference laundry inside the units, so there is no evidence of paid community laundry.
I searched for phrasing like 'laundry on each floor,' 'laundry room on every floor,' and other floor-by-floor community laundry references. The listings only mention in-unit or upstairs laundry, which does not support community laundry facilities on every floor.
Parking is clearly present across the building. At least 15+ listings explicitly mention parking in the remarks, including phrases like '2 parking spots,' 'two assigned parking stalls,' '1-car garage with tandem parking,' and '2-car garage with driveway parking.' The evidence is consistent across many agents and matches the current MLS parking_features data.
Assigned parking is indicated in the MLS (11 of 20 listings) and confirmed in multiple public remarks across listings, with phrases like "two assigned parking stalls" and "two full-size assigned parking stalls" appearing in several listings. The consistency of explicit language across different agent remarks supports a high-confidence true for assigned parking.
Covered parking is strongly supported by the remarks and MLS data. Many listings explicitly reference garages, including '2-car garage,' '1-car garage with tandem parking,' and 'enclosed 1-car garage,' while several others mention covered lanais or garage storage attached to the unit. This appears to be a real building feature, not a copy-paste artifact.
I looked for explicit wording like deeded parking, owned stall, or parking included in the deed. The remarks only describe the type and number of stalls, so deeded parking is not confirmed.
No analysis available
I searched for parking fee language such as monthly parking cost, additional parking charge, or parking rental. Nothing in the remarks indicates a separate parking fee.
Guest parking/visitor stalls are indicated in the MLS (10 of 20 listings) and corroborated by several listing remarks citing "guest stalls", "guest parking spaces", and "guest and open street parking options." Multiple independent remarks from different listings provide strong evidence the building offers guest parking.
No analysis available
There are multiple agent remarks (at least 5–8 listings) explicitly describing tandem parking—phrases include "tandem driveway parking," "1-car garage with tandem parking," and "tandem parking." While tandem was not widely checked in MLS checkbox data, the recurring explicit remarks indicate that some units in the building do have tandem parking.
No analysis available
I looked for references to a parking waitlist, parking waiting list, or joining a list for parking. The remarks do not mention any waitlist process, so this is not supported.
No analysis available
I looked for access-control language such as keycard entry, fob access, card reader, or electronic access. The remarks mention a resident manager, security guard, and security doors, but nothing about a card/fob security system.
At least two public-remark entries explicitly mention a "security guard" (one notes a "resident manager, security guard"). CURRENT MLS data also shows SECGUA checked on 3 of 20 listings. While the mentions are explicit, they appear in only a minority of listings so evidence is direct but not widespread across all agents' remarks.
I searched for security patrol-related wording such as security patrol, roving security, patrol service, or patrolled building. The remarks mention security guard presence, but not a patrol service.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence supports split AC in this building: many listings explicitly say "split A/C throughout," "new brand new split A/C," "split A/C units in every room," and "multiple split AC systems." Across the provided remarks, split AC is mentioned in well over 10 listings, with multiple different agents and unit types confirming it, reinforcing the prior high-confidence MLS signal (ACSPL).
No analysis available
No analysis available
15 of 20 current listings have DOUWAL checked in MLS, while 0 public remarks mention phrases like "double wall" or "double-wall construction." This looks like a building-level MLS checkbox that may be consistently copied across listings rather than described by agents, but the majority selection still supports inclusion.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No public remarks reference a concrete slab or 'solid concrete foundation' (0 mentions). Despite 6/20 MLS entries marking SLAB, the lack of explicit language in multiple agent remarks suggests the checkbox may be misapplied and there is insufficient remark-level evidence to assert a slab foundation.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No public remarks mention "above ground construction," and none of the listed descriptions provide details supporting that feature. With only 6 of 20 current MLS listings checking ABOGRO and no narrative confirmation, this appears more likely to be unchecked/incorrect MLS data than a confirmed building attribute.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for short-term rental indicators like STR, vacation rental, NUC, TVU, hotel rental language, or minimum-stay rules. The remarks only reference a general rental/live-work use and do not provide evidence that short-term rentals are allowed.
I looked for hotel pool or hotel rental program references, but none were found. Because there is no evidence that STR is allowed, hotel-pool participation is also not supported.
I searched for mandatory hotel-pool wording such as must participate, required rental program, or cannot opt out. The remarks contain no such evidence, so mandatory pool participation is not supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for leasehold language such as lease expiry, ground lease end dates, and renewal wording, but found nothing. Based on the remarks provided, the land tenure/lease expiry year cannot be determined.
The listings repeatedly confirm VA financing is available through assumable VA loans or mortgages. This is direct, repeated public-remarks evidence, so confidence is very high.
While the HOA is confirmed to carry 100% hurricane insurance, there is no explicit statement that the building has full or walls-in coverage. Because the required 'fully insured' wording is missing, this is set to false with medium confidence.
Fire sprinklers appear to be present, but the evidence is moderate rather than explicit: 6 of 20 current listings include the FIRSPR amenity. None of the public remarks mention sprinkler systems or fire suppression, suggesting the MLS checkbox may be copied from the building profile rather than repeatedly described by agents.
The listings do not reference any completed fire or life safety evaluation or certification at the building level. In the absence of explicit confirmation, this feature is marked as not present, with medium confidence.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Although 3 of 20 current MLS view_descriptions list MOUNTA and 4 of 20 list NONE, none of the public remarks for the building mention "mountain view", "Koolau", or "mauka." Given the absence of supporting remarks and the new/low historical confidence, the mountain view flag appears to be a checkbox error and is omitted.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sunset views appear in the current MLS view data for 2 of 20 listings, while 11 of 20 list NONE. None of the public remarks explicitly mention sunset, western exposure, or fireworks, so the evidence is MLS-based and somewhat limited, but it still suggests the building offers sunset-view units.
No analysis available
I searched for statements about seeing Friday night fireworks from the building, unit, or lanai. The remarks mention nearby beaches and Ko Olina, but nothing indicates a direct fireworks view from the property.
No analysis available
MLS checkbox shows RESMAN on 4 of 20 current listings and at least one public remark explicitly states "a resident manager, security guard." Evidence is limited to a small number of listings and may reflect agent copy/paste, so inclusion is tentative but likely—buyers should verify with the listing agent or management.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.