Plaza Landmark
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Plaza Landmark
Building Overview
Plaza Landmark in Aliamanu-Salt Lake (built 1984) with pool and fitness center. Concrete construction, mountain views.
About Plaza Landmark
Plaza Landmark is a condominium building located in the Aliamanu-Salt Lake neighborhood. According to available records it was built in 1984 and constructed of concrete. Size and unit count are not provided in the MLS data.
Based on MLS data, building amenities include a pool, fitness center, BBQ area, a resident manager, and a security guard. Units offer mountain views and air conditioning via split and window units.
Parking is available, covered, assigned and there is guest parking. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS. This information is based on MLS data and should be independently verified by prospective buyers or their agents.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I looked for numeric or qualitative owner-occupancy references such as "80% owner occupied" or "majority owner occupied." The remarks do not mention owner-occupancy at all, so no percentage can be inferred.
I searched the public remarks for explicit elevator counts or phrases like "multiple elevators," "4 elevators," or spelled-out numbers. No listing remark provided any elevator count, so the number remains unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
Strong evidence supports cable being included. Multiple listings explicitly say 'Monthly MF include basic cable' or list 'basic satellite TV,' consistent with the high-confidence MLS data showing 16/20 listings with CABTV. The repeated phrasing across listings suggests this is a stable building feature rather than a one-off agent note.
Evidence is moderate rather than explicit, but enough to support inclusion. One listing directly says monthly fees include 'common area expenses,' and another notes the 'common areas are solar powered,' which aligns with the MLS OTCOEX indicator in 13/20 listings. This looks like a building-level shared-expense inclusion, though not as repeatedly spelled out as cable, water, or hot water.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Very strong confirmation exists for hot water being included. Several listings explicitly say 'hot water is included in the maintenance fee' or 'monthly MF include ... hot water,' matching the MLS data showing 18/20 HOTWAT inclusions. This is consistent across many remarks and appears to be a genuine building feature.
Internet inclusion is strongly supported. Listings repeatedly state 'internet is included' or list internet among the monthly maintenance-fee inclusions, matching the MLS pattern of 17/20 listings with INTSER. The consistency across multiple agent remarks makes this a reliable building-level feature.
No analysis available
Sewer inclusion is very well supported. Public remarks explicitly list sewer among monthly maintenance-fee inclusions, and the MLS data shows 19/20 listings with SEWER. The evidence is highly consistent and unlikely to be a copy-paste error.
Water inclusion has extremely strong support. Multiple listings say monthly fees include water, and the MLS data shows 19/20 listings with WATER included. This is one of the most consistent features across the building's public remarks.
This is one of the most consistent amenities in the corpus. Multiple listings and agents mention BBQ/grilling facilities in different forms, strongly confirming a shared building amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The building appears to have a shared car wash facility, confirmed by multiple remarks using direct language. Even though the MLS checkbox count is modest, the repeated explicit references support inclusion.
Likely absent: only 4/20 MLS entries check clubhouse and none of the numerous public remarks explicitly call out a 'clubhouse' or 'club house' or 'community center.' Multiple other shared amenities are repeatedly listed (pool, gym, party/meeting room, BBQ), but no clear clubhouse mentions across agents.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Very strong building-level evidence: many listings explicitly mention an exercise room, fitness center, gym, or workout room, and the MLS amenities are consistent across most units. The feature appears repeatedly across multiple agents rather than as a one-off mention.
No analysis available
Supported: Several listings (matching MLS entries) explicitly mention 'meeting room,' 'party room,' or 'party/meeting room' (e.g., 'party room for entertaining,' 'meeting room') indicating the building offers meeting/party room facilities.
Strong, repeated evidence across many listings confirms patio/deck-type outdoor space at Plaza Landmark. At least 20 separate remarks reference a lanai or covered lanai, and one explicitly mentions a "large lounging deck" as an amenity; several also call it a "private lanai" or "open lanai." This looks like consistent building and unit-level outdoor space, not copy-paste noise.
Implied/limited evidence: while MLS only lists WAJOPA on 1/20 entries, several public remarks mention 'walking paths' or 'walking path' on the grounds. Mentions are fewer than for core amenities, so presence is plausible but not strongly documented.
No analysis available
Confidence 72%: 2/15 MLS entries have PRIYAR checked, suggesting some ground-floor or special units have private yard space, though remarks only mention 'yard space' generally and not explicit private yards.
No analysis available
Evidence supports a building-level recreation area: while MLS checkbox count is lower (4/20), many public remarks mention 'recreation room', 'recreation center', 'party room' or similar across multiple listings (at least several distinct listings), consistent with prior high confidence that the building offers a shared recreation area.
There are explicit mentions of a recreation room in several listings, with additional references to a recreation center, party room, and meeting room. While MLS checkbox frequency is low, the repeated public remarks indicate this is a real shared amenity rather than a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sauna is repeatedly confirmed across the corpus, including detailed mentions such as separate men's and women's saunas and steam room references. This is strong shared-amenity evidence, not a one-off agent entry.
Storage is strongly supported across the building: roughly 20+ remarks mention it in some form, including "storage locker located on the same floor," "convenient storage closet located on the same floor," "extra storage on the parking area," and "storage areas are provided for surf boards and bikes." The evidence appears consistent across multiple agents and listings, not just copy-paste checkbox data, so the building clearly offers storage units/lockers.
The listings directly confirm surfboard storage facilities. I also found repeated mentions of storage for surf boards and bikes, which makes this feature very well supported.
No analysis available
Trash chute is strongly supported by the MLS and by direct public remark mentions. With all listings showing the amenity and at least one remark explicitly describing it, this is a high-confidence building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong corroboration across many listings: buyers are repeatedly told the building has a whirlpool/hot tub/jacuzzi/spa. The wording varies, but the amenity is consistently present in the public remarks and MLS data.
Pool is consistently advertised in the public remarks for Plaza Landmark across many listings, with multiple agents describing it as a building amenity. Phrases include "swimming pool," "heated pool," "salt water pool," and "resort-style amenities include a pool," which aligns with the MLS data showing pool amenities in all 20/20 listings. This is strong, repeated evidence rather than a one-off mention or copy-paste anomaly.
A minority of listings (2/20) include the HEAPOO amenity and at least one public remark explicitly mentions a "heated pool." Several other remarks reference "salt water pool" or "salted chlorine water pool," but most listings do not state heating. This suggests pool heating exists in the building (or is offered/advertised by some agents) but reporting is inconsistent across listings.
Several listings directly identify the pool as salt water or salted chlorine water. This is clear, repeated evidence that the building's pool is salt-based.
Strong, repeated evidence across many listings confirms laundry_in_unit. Dozens of remarks mention 'washer/dryer in the unit,' 'in-unit washer and dryer,' or 'stackable washer/dryer,' indicating this is not a one-off and appears across multiple agents. This aligns with the prior high-confidence MLS pattern showing 17/20 listings including washer/dryer.
Strong evidence shows the building has shared/community laundry facilities in addition to some units having in-unit laundry. Multiple current listings explicitly mention community laundry or commercial laundry, suggesting a building amenity rather than copy-paste noise. This is consistent with the prior high-confidence MLS data showing community laundry in most recent listings.
I searched for explicit paid-laundry terms such as coin laundry, card laundry, quarters, or fees and found no matches. The public remarks confirm community laundry exists, but they do not indicate that it requires payment.
I looked for wording like 'laundry on each floor' or 'laundry room on every floor' and found none. The listings only support a community laundry room on-site or on the first floor, which is not enough to mark every floor.
Parking is strongly supported across the building: 18 of 20 current MLS listings include parking-related features, and multiple remarks explicitly reference parking stalls, parking garage, or additional parking options. This appears consistent across many agents rather than a one-off copy/paste error.
Assigned parking is clearly present in the building. At least 16 of 20 current MLS listings indicate assigned stalls, and remarks repeatedly confirm it with phrases like 'assigned parking,' 'one assigned parking stall,' and '2 assigned parking.'
Covered parking is well supported by both MLS data and remarks. Roughly 15 of 20 listings reference covered or garage parking, and multiple agents explicitly describe covered stalls, secure parking, or a gated garage.
I looked for explicit wording such as "deeded parking," "owned stall," or "parking included in deed" and found none. The listings describe assigned/covered parking, which is not enough to conclude the stall is deeded.
No analysis available
I searched for parking charges, monthly fees, rental costs, or similar language, but no listing provides a dollar amount or states that parking requires a separate fee. Some remarks note parking is included in maintenance fees, but that is not the same as a separate monthly parking fee.
Guest parking is strongly evidenced across the building. Current MLS data shows 17 of 20 listings with guest parking, and many remarks independently confirm it with language like 'guest parking available,' 'ample guest parking,' and 'guest stalls.'
Secured entry is supported by a substantial set of listings and remarks. About 12 of 20 current MLS records indicate secured entry, while multiple remarks reinforce this with phrases such as 'gated entry,' 'secure building,' 'secured parking,' and '24 hour security.'
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for "waitlist," "waiting list," and similar parking-queue language, but found no evidence of a parking waitlist system. The public remarks describe parking availability and extra parking options rather than any waitlist process.
No analysis available
I looked for key card, fob, card reader, and electronic entry language. The listings include secured fob/key entrance wording, which is strong evidence of card/fob access security.
Security guard service is strongly supported across the listing set. Multiple remarks explicitly mention "24 hour security," "24-hour security patrol," and "security," and this is consistent with the historical MLS amenities data showing SECGUA in 19 of 20 listings. The evidence appears to come from many different agents and is not just copy-paste in one or two remarks.
I searched for security patrol or roving patrol language, and one public remark directly confirms '24-hour security patrol.' Combined with multiple references to 24-hour security, this supports security patrol service.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is mixed evidence for window A/C at Plaza Landmark. The current MLS inclusions reportedly show ACWIUN in roughly 14 of 20 listings, but the public remarks do not explicitly say “window AC”; instead, several listings mention “split air,” “A/C in Living Room and Bedroom,” or just “AC,” which may indicate agent copy-paste or inconsistent terminology. Because some units appear to have A/C and the MLS checkbox is still frequently set, the building likely offers A/C in some form, but the window-unit specifically is not strongly confirmed by remarks.
Concrete construction is strongly supported by MLS data: all 20 current listings list CONCRE as a construction material, matching the prior historical pattern (15/15). None of the public remarks explicitly mention a different construction type or suggest a change, so this appears to be stable building-level data rather than copy-paste error.
Confidence 75%: 3/15 MLS entries have DOUWAL checked, suggesting some portions or units use double-wall construction, though remarks do not discuss wall type.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for short-term rental indicators such as STR, vacation rental, TVU, NUC, or legal short-term rental language and found none. With no public remark suggesting STRs are allowed, the building is treated as not allowing them based on the available remarks.
I looked for hotel pool language such as hotel rental pool, managed by hotel, or brand-operated rental programs and found nothing. Because the remarks do not support STR eligibility, this must also remain false.
I searched for language like mandatory pool, required rental program, or cannot opt out, and found none. Since the remarks do not indicate STRs are allowed, mandatory hotel-pool participation is also false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for phrases like "lease expires," "ground lease," "leasehold," and any 4-digit expiration year, but found none. Remarks instead point to fee-simple ownership, so there is no lease-expiry year to extract.
Multiple listings directly say the Plaza Landmark is VA approved, which indicates VA financing is accepted. This is strong, repeated public evidence.
I searched for terms like "fully insured," "walls-in coverage," "full insurance," or similar HOA insurance language. None of the public remarks explicitly state that the building is fully insured.
Multiple listings explicitly confirm fire sprinklers, including phrases like “fire sprinklers,” “sprinkler system,” “sprinklers already installed,” and “equipped with fire sprinklers in the unit.” The evidence is consistent across many agents and aligns with the current MLS data showing FIRSPR in 12/20 listings, so this appears to be a real building feature rather than copy-paste error.
I looked for explicit language such as "fire life safety evaluation passed," "FLSE passed," "fire safety certified," or similar compliance wording. The remarks only reference fire sprinklers, which is related but not enough to confirm a passed safety evaluation.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Several listing remarks explicitly advertise ocean views — examples: "incredible OCEAN VIEWS that can be seen from every room" and "mountain-to-ocean views". At least 3–4 separate remarks reference ocean/water views across different listings, and 2/20 current MLS view_descriptions include OCEAN, providing strong building-level evidence that some units offer ocean views.
Mountain views are strongly supported across the building: about 13 listings mention them in MLS view data, and numerous remarks say things like "mountain views," "panoramic... mountains," and "mountain and golf course views." The repeated wording across multiple listings suggests this is a real building-level feature, not a one-off agent mistake.
Confidence 90%: No listings mention Diamond Head views, and 0/15 MLS entries use the DIAHEA code despite extensive view descriptions.
City views are confirmed by MLS and public remarks, with listings describing "amazing city and golf course views," "stunning city and mountain views," and "city lights illuminate the night sky." The consistency across different listings supports that the building offers city-view units, even if not every unit has them.
There is little-to-no explicit use of coastline-specific terms in the remarks (no occurrences of "coastline", "shoreline", or "coastal"); only a few references to ocean/water appear. Given the absence of direct coastline phrasing across the many agent remarks and only 1/20 MLS COASTL checks, there's moderate-to-high confidence that 'coastline view' is not a commonly advertised building-level feature.
Moderate evidence of garden views/landscaped setting: 6 of 20 MLS entries flag garden (GARDEN) and several unit remarks describe a "garden setting", "lush landscaping", "beautifully landscaped grounds" or "garden oasis." This indicates some units and common areas offer garden or courtyard views.
Golf course views are a defining feature of the building: 16 MLS listings include golf course view data, and public remarks repeatedly reference "golf course view," "sweeping golf course views," and "unobstructed" golf course outlooks. This is highly consistent across listings and appears to be a true building-level selling point.
Confidence 90%: 0/15 MLS entries include MARCAN, and none of the remarks reference marina views, despite extensive discussion of other view types.
No analysis available
Limited but present evidence of sunset/west exposure: 4 of 20 MLS entries include SUNSET and a handful of remarks explicitly mention "watching the sunset" or evening lanai use. The feature appears in a minority of listings, suggesting sunset views are available for some units but not ubiquitous across the building.
No analysis available
I looked for direct statements about viewing Friday night fireworks from the unit, lanai, or building. The remarks only mention golf course, mountain, city, ocean, and sunset views, so fireworks view is not supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks repeatedly confirm an on-site/resident manager with phrases such as “resident manager,” “on-site resident manager,” “on-grounds property manager,” and “building manager on property.” This is consistent across many listings and matches the current MLS pattern of RESMAN in 18/20 listings, indicating a stable building-level amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.