
Plantation View Hale
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Plantation View Hale
Building Overview
Plantation View Hale in Waipahu (built 1964) — concrete construction with pool, BBQ area, and resident manager. Window AC; assigned parking.

About Plantation View Hale
Based on MLS data, Plantation View Hale is located in the Waipahu neighborhood and was built in 1964. The MLS records indicate the building is constructed of concrete. Size and unit count are not specified in the available MLS data.
According to available records, on-site amenities include a pool, a BBQ area, and a resident manager. Air conditioning is by window units. The building does not allow pets and short-term rentals are not permitted.
Parking is available with assigned stalls and guest parking. Management company information is listed as unknown in the MLS. This summary is based on MLS data; buyers should verify all details, fees, rules, and current conditions with the listing agent or management.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched all remarks for explicit owner-occupancy percentages or clear descriptors (e.g., '80% owner occupied', 'majority owner occupied') and found none. Because there is no numeric current value to preserve and no remarks to determine a percentage, the owner-occupancy is unknown (null) with low confidence.
Remarks repeatedly describe the property as a "walk-up" or "low-rise, walk-up building," which is strong evidence there are no elevators in the building. Given these explicit statements across listings, 0 elevators is supported with high confidence.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Current MLS data marks OTCOEX in 17/20 listings and numerous agent remarks explicitly state common area maintenance is covered (quotes include "common area maintenance" and "common area expenses"). Evidence is consistent across many listings and appears repeatedly in agent remarks rather than being isolated to one listing.
No analysis available
MLS checkboxes show electricity included for 17 of 20 listings and multiple agent remarks state "maintenance fee includes electricity" or "electricity included." The phrasing is repeated across listings, indicating strong, consistent evidence that electricity is included in the maintenance fee.
No analysis available
HOTWAT is checked in 14/20 MLS records and several public remarks explicitly state "hot water" is included in the maintenance fee (quotes include "maintenance fee covers electricity, water, hot water, sewer"). Although a minority of listings show WTRHTR historically, the majority of current listings/remarks indicate building-supplied hot water is included.
No analysis available
No analysis available
MLS checkboxes indicate sewer is included in 19 of 20 listings and agent remarks frequently state the monthly maintenance fee "includes sewer." The consistency and prevalence across listings give strong confidence that sewer is included.
Water is checked in 19/20 MLS records and appears repeatedly in agent remarks such as "maintenance fee includes water" and "water included." The broad, consistent reporting across listings supports high confidence that water is included in the maintenance fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence 88%: 2/12 MLS entries include patio/deck (PATDEC/COVPAT), and remarks reference lanais such as a 'freshly painted lanai' and a 'Private, gated front lanai entry for exclusive use,' which function as patios/decks. Multiple units having lanais indicates the building offers patio/deck-type spaces.
Confidence 90%: Only 1/12 listings has WAJOPA checked, and no remarks across 12 listings mention walking/jogging paths. Such an amenity would typically be promoted, so the solitary MLS indication is likely a mistaken checkbox.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence 90%: Only 1/12 listings shows PUTGRE in amenities, while 11/12 do not, and none of the public remarks for any listing mention a putting green. Given that a putting green is a notable amenity agents typically highlight, the single MLS checkmark is likely an error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence 72%: 1/12 listings have storage in building amenities and 1/12 have storage in unit_features, indicating that at least some units are assigned storage or have designated storage areas. While remarks do not highlight it, repeated MLS coding from different listings implies the feature exists.
Confidence 90%: No listing mentions any storage specifically for surfboards.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence the building has a pool: at least 6 separate listings mention a pool or swimming pool (e.g., "The building features a pool, community laundry," "Community features its own pool and large courtyard," and "Amenities include ... a swimming pool (empty at this time)"). Mentions appear across multiple agent remarks rather than solely implied checkbox data, supporting inclusion of the pool as a building amenity.
No analysis available
Confidence 80%: The building is said to have 'a pool' but there is no indication that it is a saltwater pool.
No analysis available
Multiple data points support community laundry: 12 of 20 current MLS listings have the COMLAU amenity checked and one public remark explicitly states "the building features ... community laundry." Note one listing also advertises an in-unit washer and dryer, indicating some units may have private laundry, but building-level shared laundry is affirmed across listings and MLS checkboxes.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Building-wide parking is consistently advertised: 19 of 20 current MLS entries list parking types. The public remarks repeatedly mention 'one parking stall', '1 open parking', and 'parking situated directly outside', indicating parking is provided for units. Evidence is strong across multiple agent listings and consistent with historical MLS checkbox data.
Assigned parking is commonly provided: 17 of 20 current MLS entries list ASSIGN. Multiple remarks explicitly state 'assigned parking stall' or 'one assigned parking', and others note 'designated' or 'dedicated' stalls, showing consistent confirmation across several agent listings rather than isolated copy/paste.
No analysis available
Looked for 'deeded', 'owned parking', or 'included in deed'. Only 'assigned/dedicated' language appears across listings; assigned stalls do not confirm deeded parking, so parking_deeded is false with low confidence.
No analysis available
Searched for explicit 'parking fee', 'monthly parking charge', or amounts for parking. There is no information about a separate parking fee in the remarks, so the monthly parking fee is unknown.
Guest parking is available in parts of the project: 7/20 MLS entries list GUEST and multiple unit remarks mention '3 guest stalls' or 'visitor/guest parking' and 'visitors parking stalls and street parking are plentiful'. Evidence is consistent though not universal, so confidence is high but slightly lower than for building parking/assigned stalls.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched all remarks for references to a parking waitlist or waiting list language. None found; absence of evidence suggests no waitlist is indicated in public remarks (low confidence).
No analysis available
Confidence 80%: None of the remarks mention card/fob access, keyed elevators, or controlled entry via cards.
No analysis available
Confidence 80%: Listings mention a resident manager but do not mention any security patrols.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings (at least 6–8 separate remarks) explicitly reference window or optional AC units, including phrases like "window AC in living room," "each AC unit is an additional seventy five dollars per unit," and "additional flat monthly fee applies if a window A/C unit is installed." Historical MLS inclusions also flagged ACWIUN on numerous listings, so evidence is strong that some units in the building have (or may install) window AC units and the HOA charges per unit.
Strong evidence across listings: 16 of 20 current MLS records list CONCRE and public remarks explicitly state "CMU walls" and "clean tapered CMU walls," indicating concrete/block construction. Evidence is consistent across multiple agents and listings, supporting a high-confidence identification of concrete construction.
Historical data supported double-wall construction (prior high confidence) and 7 of 20 current MLS listings check DOUWAL, but none of the public remarks explicitly state 'double wall' or 'double-wall construction'. Evidence is mixed: historical/MLS checkbox support exists, but remarks do not confirm, so confidence is moderate.
No public remarks reference 'hollow tile' (0 of 20), despite 10 of 20 MLS records checking HOLTIL; given the historical low confidence and absent supporting remarks, there is weak evidence for hollow tile construction and it is likely an MLS checkbox inconsistency.
Multiple listings (7/20 checked MASSTU) and remarks citing "CMU walls"/"clean tapered CMU walls" support masonry/stucco finish. The combination of historical high confidence and corroborating remarks yields high confidence that the building has masonry/stucco construction/finish.
No analysis available
Limited, mixed evidence: 3 of 20 MLS records list SLAB but no public remarks explicitly state "concrete slab" or similar. Because a small number of listings indicate slab foundation, the building may offer slab foundations for some units, but the evidence is only implied and not strongly corroborated in remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Only 3 of 20 current MLS records check ABOGRO, but 0 of 20 public remarks mention 'above ground' or similar phrasing. Without remarks or historical support, evidence is weak and the building should not be treated as having a documented 'above ground' construction feature.
Confidence 88%: Only 1/12 listings marks BRICK in construction_materials, whereas the majority reference CONCRE and MASSTU, and remarks describe 'CMU walls' (concrete masonry units), which are typical for this type of low-rise in Hawaii. The lone brick indication conflicts with the broader data and is likely an input error.
No analysis available
Searched for explicit STR language (short-term/vacation rental, TVU, 30-day minimum). The remarks do not state STR is permitted or provide any hotel/TVU details; therefore set to false with low confidence.
Searched for 'hotel rental pool', 'hotel rental program', or hotel-managed operations. No evidence found. Because str_allowed is not supported by the remarks, hotel pool participation is false.
Searched for 'mandatory hotel pool', 'required to participate', or similar language. No evidence of any rental pool or mandatory participation; set to false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched for leasehold language (e.g., 'lease expires', 'land lease to YEAR'). Multiple remarks explicitly describe the property as fee simple, so a land lease expiry is not applicable.
Searched for explicit phrases like 'VA approved', 'VA financing', or 'VA loans accepted'. While the remarks reference VA buyers/BAH benefits, there is no statement that the building is VA loan approved, so financing_va is set to false with low confidence.
I reviewed all public remarks for explicit HOA insurance language (e.g., 'fully insured', 'walls-in coverage', 'comprehensive building insurance') and found none. With no mentions and no verified current value, returning false with medium confidence.
No analysis available
I searched all public remarks for phrases like 'FLSE passed', 'fire life safety evaluation passed', 'fire inspection passed', and 'life safety compliant' and found no evidence. With no mentions and no existing verified value, defaulting to false with medium confidence per rules.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Current MLS data shows 2 of 20 listings with VIEW=CITY and the public remarks include at least one explicit mention: "Enjoy city views from your private lanai." Additional remarks reference desirable vistas (Diamond Head, Makai) and a few listings note lanai views, indicating multiple units in the building offer city/urban views. Evidence is consistent across listings and aligns with prior high-confidence data, so the building should be marked as offering city views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence 88%: 0/12 listings have SUNRIS in view_descriptions, and none of the remarks reference sunrise-facing or morning sun views despite detailed marketing text for many renovated units. If notable sunrise views were present, they would likely be highlighted, so their complete absence suggests this is not a recognized feature.
Confidence 88%: 0/12 listings include SUNSET in view_descriptions, and no marketing remarks describe sunset views, even in top-floor and 'view' units. With no MLS coding or narrative support, it is unlikely the building offers notable sunset views.
No analysis available
Confidence 90%: No remarks mention viewing fireworks from the building or units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings (RESMAN checked on 5 of 20 current MLS entries) and at least two public remarks explicitly state the building has a "resident manager" or "on-site resident manager" (e.g., "The building features a pool, community laundry, and a resident manager" and "Amenities include an on-site resident manager"). Evidence comes from multiple agents/listings and aligns with historical MLS data, so confidence is high that the building has a resident manager on-site.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.