Plantation Town Apartments
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Plantation Town Apartments
Building Overview
Plantation Town Apartments in Waipahu — built 2007, concrete construction with mountain and Diamond Head views.
About Plantation Town Apartments
Plantation Town Apartments is located in Waipahu and was built in 2007. According to available records, the building is concrete construction. Size and unit mix information are not provided in the MLS data.
Based on MLS data, building amenities include a BBQ area, a resident manager, and a security guard. The building has 1 elevator and units feature window air conditioning. Available views listed in the MLS include mountain and Diamond Head.
Additional details from the MLS indicate parking is available, assigned, with guest parking; pets are allowed; short-term rentals are not allowed. The management company is listed as unknown in the available records. This summary is based on MLS data and buyers should verify all details independently with listing agents or property management.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I looked for any explicit owner-occupancy percentage in the remarks, and one listing directly gives 78%. Since this is a numeric field and the value is explicitly stated, it is retained with very high confidence.
I found repeated references to elevators in the public remarks, which confirms the building has elevator service. However, the remarks never state a number, so I kept the current value of 1. There is no explicit elevator count to override it, even though the building’s size and high-floor units make elevator service plausible.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
MLS checkbox OTCOEX appears on 13 of 20 current listings, but none of the public remarks explicitly state phrases like 'common area electricity' or 'building power included.' Evidence is mixed: repeated MLS checkbox usage suggests the fee may cover common electric, but the lack of explicit remarks across agents suggests possible copy/paste; confidence is moderate (implied).
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence points away from hot water being included in the HOA/maintenance fee. Only 1 of 20 current MLS listings shows HOTWAT, while 13 of 20 show WTRHTR, and remarks across multiple listings repeatedly mention a unit water heater being installed or replaced. That pattern is much more consistent with owner-provided hot water heaters than building-paid hot water.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer inclusion is strongly supported by both MLS and remarks. 19 of 20 current listings include SEWER, and multiple listings explicitly say "low maintenance fees include water/sewer" or "includes sewer and water." The evidence is consistent across multiple agents and appears reliable rather than copy-paste error.
Water inclusion is very well supported. 19 of 20 current MLS listings include WATER, and several public remarks explicitly state that maintenance fees "include water" or "includes sewer and water." The repeated phrasing across many listings suggests a stable building-level feature.
Strong, consistent evidence across listings: many public remarks explicitly reference a BBQ or grilling area (MLS summary: 19/20 listings show BBQ). Phrases include "BBQ area", "BBQ grilling stations", and "BBQ/picnic area", appearing across multiple agents' remarks, indicating a building-level shared BBQ amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings across different remarks confirm a shared dog park/pet area in the building, with wording such as "on-site dog park," "dog park on the property," "dedicated dog area," and "enclosed dog park." The consistency across many listings strongly supports that this is a real common amenity rather than copied MLS data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Several listings explicitly mention a meeting/party room or common area meeting/party room (phrases include "meeting/party room", "common area meeting/party room"). While fewer listings note this than BBQ/recreation, evidence appears in multiple agent remarks supporting a shared meeting/party room.
Many listings explicitly advertise outdoor space: over a dozen listings (≈15) mention lanai/balcony or covered lanai. Representative quotes include "private lanai", "covered lanai with relaxing mountain and city views", and "balcony with lovely views." Evidence is consistent across multiple agent remarks and aligns with MLS amenity checkboxes, so building-level patio/deck amenities should be included.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong, repeated evidence across many listings supports a shared recreation room amenity in the building. Remarks repeatedly use phrases like "recreation room," "recreation center," and "meeting/party room," suggesting this is not a one-off agent typo but a consistent building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for surfboard storage, board storage, surf storage, or similar amenity language, and found nothing. The amenities described are dog park, BBQ/recreation areas, garden, and parking, with no surfboard storage reference.
No analysis available
MLS amenity checkboxes indicate a trash/garbage chute in a majority of listings (15/20), but public remarks contain no explicit mentions of a trash chute. Because the evidence is from agent-checked amenity boxes rather than direct remarks, this is an implied feature with moderate confidence rather than explicit confirmation.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for saltwater-related pool wording such as 'salt water pool,' 'saltwater pool,' or 'saline pool,' and found none. One remark mentions swimming at Waipahu District Park's pool, but that is a nearby public amenity, not evidence that the building's pool is salt water.
In-unit laundry is strongly supported across the listings: dozens of remarks explicitly mention it, including "in-unit washer and dryer," "stack washer/dryer," "washer / dryer in unit," and "new washer, dryer." The evidence is consistent across multiple agents and appears to reflect a real building feature rather than copy-paste error.
No analysis available
I looked for indications of coin-operated, card-operated, or otherwise paid community laundry, and there were no such references. The remarks consistently describe in-unit washer/dryer setups, so there is no evidence of a shared paid laundry amenity.
I searched the public remarks for language like 'laundry on every floor,' 'community laundry on each floor,' or 'floor-by-floor laundry,' and found nothing. The listings only mention in-unit washer/dryer or stackable laundry inside individual condos, which does not support a shared laundry facility on every floor.
Parking is strongly supported across the building: all 20/20 MLS listings include parking features, and the remarks consistently mention stalls or spaces. Phrases like "1 open, assigned parking stall," "one assigned parking stall," and "2 tandem parking" appear throughout, indicating this is not a one-off copy-paste issue.
Assigned parking is well documented in both MLS data and remarks. About 16/20 listings flag assigned parking, and many remarks explicitly say "assigned parking stall," "reserved parking stall," or "designated open parking stall," showing a consistent building feature rather than an agent error.
No analysis available
I looked for deeded parking, owned stall, or parking included in the deed language and found no such mention. The repeated wording points to assigned/secured stalls rather than deeded parking.
No analysis available
I searched for parking fee, monthly parking charge, additional parking cost, or parking rental language and found nothing. The remarks only mention assigned, gated, tandem, and guest parking without any price.
Guest parking is repeatedly confirmed in the remarks, not just the MLS checkbox data. Roughly 12/20 listings include guest parking in MLS, and the public descriptions frequently say "ample guest parking," "plenty of guest parking," or "visitor's parking," indicating a shared building amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for parking waitlist or waiting list references and found none. Because the listings repeatedly describe assigned stalls rather than a queue system, this appears not to be a building feature mentioned in the public remarks.
No analysis available
Public remarks repeatedly mention fob entry, gated FOB access, and secured entry, which is strong evidence of card/fob access security. This matches the feature definition for security_card.
Building security is strongly supported: historical MLS checkbox data shows 15 of 20 listings with SECGUA and numerous current remarks state '24/7 security patrol', 'security guard on duty', or 'security patrol' (appearing across multiple agent remarks). Evidence is consistent across listings and not limited to a single agent's copy/paste, so confidence is high that the building has on-site security guard service.
I found several direct references to security patrol service, including 24/7 patrol and a guard roaming the property. This is strong, repeated evidence that the building has security patrol.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Window air conditioning is strongly supported for this building. I found explicit mentions in many separate listings, including phrases like 'a/C window unit,' 'window A/C unit,' 'window AC in the living room,' and 'New Ac unit.' This looks like a real building/unit feature rather than a one-off copy-paste error, and it aligns with the MLS inclusion history.
This feature is strongly supported by the MLS data: 18 of 20 listings show CONCRE in construction materials. Public remarks repeatedly call Plantation Town Apartments a 'newer building' / 'built 2007' / 'constructed in 2007' / 'built in 2008,' which is consistent with concrete condo construction for this building. The evidence appears to come from many listings across multiple agents rather than a one-off mention.
There is no supporting language in the remarks for double-wall construction across the listings reviewed. With only 6 of 20 MLS records showing DOUWAL and no explicit site-visit or owner verification, the evidence is too weak to treat this as a confirmed building feature. It appears more likely to be an unverified checkbox entry than a true building characteristic.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Only 1 of 20 MLS listings includes 'BRICK' in construction_materials and none of the public remarks reference brick or a brick exterior. This sparse and isolated checkbox, combined with absence of corroborating remarks, indicates the brick tag is likely erroneous and the building should not be listed as brick construction.
No analysis available
I searched for short-term rental allowed, STR permitted, vacation rental, NUC, TVU, and similar language, but found no positive evidence. Based on the absence of any STR-friendly language in these remarks, the building is treated as not allowing STR.
I searched for hotel rental pool, hotel program, Hilton/Trump/Ritz pool, or similar references and found none. Since short-term rental permission is not supported in the remarks, hotel-pool participation is also false.
I searched for mandatory hotel pool, required participation, cannot opt out, or similar wording and found nothing. With no indication of an STR or hotel-pool regime in the remarks, mandatory pool participation is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for terms like lease expires, ground lease, leasehold, renewed through, and specific expiry years, but found nothing. No public remarks in this set identify a land lease end date or renewal year.
Multiple listings directly state VA financing is approved or offer assumable VA loans. This is strong public-remarks evidence that the building supports VA loan financing.
The listings directly support full HOA insurance coverage with repeated references to 100% hurricane insurance, which is the walls-in style signal requested. This is strong, repeated evidence, so the feature is true with very high confidence.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for FLSE-related phrases such as passed fire/life safety evaluation, fire safety certified, life safety compliant, or passed fire inspection, and found none. The listings do mention fire sprinklers and sprinkler systems, but that is not the same as a documented FLSE pass. Based on the absence of explicit pass language, this is best treated as false for now.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Mountain views are repeatedly advertised across the listings, with roughly a dozen remarks referencing 'mountain views,' 'Waianae Mountains,' 'Waianae Range views,' or 'mountain and city views.' This appears to be consistent across multiple agents and listings, not a one-off copy-paste error.
No analysis available
Several listings explicitly reference city/downtown views—phrases include 'city views', 'city and mountain views', and 'Honolulu lights at night' (appearing in multiple unit remarks, ~6-10 mentions). The evidence indicates the building offers some city-view units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings or remarks explicitly mention sunrise/morning sun/eastern exposure (0 mentions). MLS view_descriptions likewise show 0/20 for SUNRIS, so there is strong evidence the building does not offer designated sunrise views.
Sunset views are clearly supported by multiple listing remarks, with at least 2 explicit mentions of sunsets and evening views from lanais. The wording is specific enough to trust and suggests the building offers sunset-facing units, even if not every unit has them.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit statements that units can see Friday night fireworks from the building or lanai, and found none. The remarks mention mountain, city, Pearl Harbor, Diamond Head, and sunset views, but not fireworks views.
No analysis available
The evidence strongly supports that the building has a resident manager on-site. Multiple listings explicitly mention a "resident manager," "on-site resident manager," or a manager "on duty during normal business hours," and this appears across many different remarks rather than a single copied description. This aligns with the historical MLS RESMAN checkbox being present in 15 of 20 listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.