Pearl Ridge Terraces
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Pearl Ridge Terraces
Building Overview
Pearl Ridge Terraces in Aiea — concrete building (built 1967) with a swimming pool and assigned parking.
About Pearl Ridge Terraces
Pearl Ridge Terraces is a residential building located in the Aiea neighborhood. According to available records, the building was constructed in 1967 using concrete construction. The MLS information provided does not specify the number of units or building square footage.
Key features noted in the MLS data include an on-site pool. No other common-area amenities are listed in the provided records.
Parking is available and assigned. Pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not permitted per the MLS data. The management company is listed as unknown in the available information. Based on MLS data, prospective buyers should verify all details, including fees, unit-specific features, and management information, with the listing agent or management company prior to making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Association fee inclusion for common area electricity appears in the MLS on 9 of 14 current listings. No public remark explicitly mentions common-area electric/power, so this is supported mainly by repeated MLS checkbox data rather than agent description.
No analysis available
Multiple remarks directly say electricity is billed separately or paid through management, which strongly contradicts an electricity-included fee. Only 2 of 14 current listings have ELECTR checked, so the evidence points to electricity not being included.
No analysis available
Hot water inclusion is explicitly stated in public remarks and is also reflected in the MLS on 10 of 14 current listings. The evidence is consistent enough across multiple listings to treat this as a real building-level fee inclusion.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer is one of the most consistently supported fee inclusions in the building, with 13 of 14 current MLS listings checking it. At least one public remark explicitly lists 'Sewer' as included, confirming the MLS pattern.
Water inclusion is directly named in public remarks and appears in 12 of 14 current MLS listings. The repeated checkbox pattern plus the explicit remark make this a high-confidence building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence supports patio/deck amenities in Pearl Ridge Terraces. At least 8 listings explicitly mention outdoor space, including phrases such as "large lanai," "large useable lanai," "extra-large open lanai," "spacious private gated back patio," and "private backyard area." The repeated mentions across multiple remarks suggest this is a genuine building feature and not just MLS checkbox noise.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
None of the public remarks explicitly describe a recreation area, recreation deck, or recreation space. Across the listings, the consistent shared amenity mentioned is the pool, along with laundry and guest parking; the sparse 2/14 RECARE checkbox usage appears inconsistent and possibly copy/paste. Based on the remarks, the building does not have enough evidence to confirm a distinct recreation area feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Pool is strongly supported across the building: all current MLS listings mark it in amenities, and many remarks independently confirm a shared/community pool. Several agents mention it in different ways—"community swimming pool," "sparkling pool," "pool right near the unit," and "pool maintenance"—which suggests this is a real building amenity rather than a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Shared/community laundry is strongly supported across the listings. At least 9+ of the provided remarks explicitly mention it using phrases like "community laundry," "community laundry facilities," "laundry facilities," and "laundry in the same building," which is consistent with the prior MLS COMLAU data on 14/14 listings. The evidence appears repeated across multiple agents rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Parking is clearly present across the building. Multiple listings mention assigned parking, open parking, guest parking, and specific stall numbers, with 14/14 MLS entries showing parking features and none marked 'NONE'. The remarks are consistent across different agents and appear to confirm the MLS data rather than copy-paste noise.
Most listings (11 of 13 per MLS flags) and multiple public remarks explicitly mention assigned stalls: quotes include '1 assigned parking stall,' 'assigned parking included,' and 'your assigned parking stall.' The consistency across many listings supports high confidence that the building offers assigned parking.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit wording like deeded parking, owned stall, or parking included in the deed and found none. The listings consistently describe assigned or included stalls, which is not the same as deeded parking.
No analysis available
I searched for any mention of a parking rent, monthly parking charge, or dollar amount tied to parking and found nothing. The remarks mention assigned parking and guest parking, but no separate parking fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for phrases such as parking waitlist, waiting list, or joining a queue for parking and found none. The available remarks suggest parking is assigned rather than managed through a waitlist system.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
None of the listings’ public remarks reference split, ductless, or mini-split AC, despite detailed descriptions of renovations and comforts. Only 1/12 MLS entries checks the split AC inclusion with no textual support, which is more consistent with a mistaken checkbox than a real amenity. Given the lack of corroborating remarks across many units and agents, split AC is treated as not present at the building level.
There is moderate building-level evidence for window AC: 10 of 14 current MLS listings include the ACWIUN inclusion. None of the public remarks explicitly mention window AC, so the support appears to come from consistent MLS checkbox usage rather than listing text. Because the feature is common enough across current listings, it is reasonable to keep it as available in the building.
The building appears to be concrete construction based on MLS records, with 11 of 14 listings currently showing CONCRE in construction_materials. Public remarks do not explicitly mention construction type, but nothing suggests a change or contradiction. This looks like a stable, repeated MLS attribute rather than a one-off agent entry.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The MASSTU (masonry/stucco) construction flag appears on just 1 out of 12 listings, which is inconsistent with how genuine building-wide features typically appear in MLS data. With no supporting remarks about masonry or stucco and an overwhelming majority of listings omitting MASSTU, the evidence points to that single instance being incorrect, so masonry/stucco construction is not treated as a building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for explicit language allowing short-term rentals, such as STR permitted, TVU, vacation rental, or legal short-term rental, and found no such evidence. In the absence of any permitting language, this should be treated as not allowed based on the public remarks.
I looked for references to a hotel rental pool, hotel program, or hotel-managed operations and found none. Because short-term rental is not indicated in the remarks, this must also be false.
I searched for wording like mandatory rental pool, required participation, or cannot opt out and found nothing. With no evidence of a hotel pool or any rental-program requirement, this is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for leasehold language such as lease expires, ground lease, leasehold, or a 4-digit expiry year and found none. The only tenure clue is "Fee simple," so there is no lease-expiry year to extract.
Multiple remarks directly reference VA financing, including a VA assumption rate and a statement that the building is VA approved. That is strong public-remarks evidence that VA loans are accepted for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No listings describe ocean or water views, and 5 of 12 MLS view fields explicitly state NONE. Remarks focus on views of the rail station, mall, and general pleasant outlooks, with no mention of the ocean, so buyers should not expect ocean-view units in this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
None of the 12 listings reference coastline, shoreline, or coastal views, and several explicitly show view as NONE. Agents highlight proximity to rail and shopping rather than any coastal outlook, so coastline views should not be considered a feature of this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sunset views appear in 2 of 14 current MLS listings, while most others show NONE. Public remarks do not clearly confirm sunset or western exposure, so this looks more like limited unit-level availability than a building-wide, repeatedly described feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Six of 13 current MLS listings include RESMAN in amenities and several public remarks explicitly state "Resident Manager service", "manager’s office and laundry in the same building", or "a resident manager". Evidence is repeated across multiple agent remarks (not a single isolated listing), so there is strong support that the building has an on-site/resident manager.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.