Pearl Regency
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Pearl Regency
Building Overview
Pearl Regency in Downtown-Chinatown — concrete building (1981) with pool and fitness center.
About Pearl Regency
Pearl Regency is a residential building located in the Downtown‑Chinatown neighborhood. According to available records, it was built in 1981 and constructed of concrete. Size information (unit count or square footage) is not provided in the MLS data.
Based on MLS data, on-site amenities include a pool, fitness center, BBQ area, resident manager, and security guard. Units use window air conditioning. The building reports ocean, mountain, and sunset views for some units.
Parking is available and noted as covered and assigned, with guest parking also listed. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS. This summary is based on MLS data; buyers should verify all details, policies, fees, and availability with the listing agent or management.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for numeric owner-occupancy data and phrases like "80% owner occupied," "majority owner occupied," or "highly owner occupied," but found nothing in the remarks. Because no explicit percentage or ownership description appears, the owner-occupancy rate cannot be determined from these listings.
I searched the public remarks for phrases like "4 elevators," "multiple elevators," or similar wording, but found none. Since this is a numeric field and no current value was provided, the building's elevator count remains unknown from the remarks alone.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Common-area electricity appears in 13 of 20 current MLS listings via OTCOEX, suggesting a building-level fee inclusion that is present in many but not all listings. The remarks reviewed do not explicitly mention common electric/building power, so the evidence is mostly from the MLS checkbox pattern rather than agent descriptions.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Hot water is indicated in 14 of 20 current MLS listings through HOTWAT, with 2 listings also showing WTRHTR. The remarks are mostly silent on hot water service, so this is a moderate-confidence building feature based mainly on MLS data rather than repeated textual confirmation.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer inclusion is extremely strong: 20 of 20 current MLS listings show SEWER in association_fee_includes. Several remarks also reference “mandatory in-unit sewer upgrades” and “building wide main air vent and sewer pipe replacement,” which supports a consistent building-level sewer-related fee context rather than a copy-paste anomaly.
Water inclusion is unanimous in the current MLS data, with 20 of 20 listings showing WATER in association_fee_includes. The public remarks do not explicitly repeat this, but the consistent MLS pattern across all listings is strong enough to treat it as a confirmed building feature.
BBQ/grilling amenities are clearly present at the building level. Multiple listings mention 'BBQ area,' 'BBQ grills,' 'BBQs,' and similar wording across different remarks. This is strong, repeated evidence from several listings and agents.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Car wash facilities are well supported by the MLS and public remarks. Several listings explicitly describe a 'car wash area' or 'car wash station,' and this appears repeatedly enough to confirm a shared building amenity. Confidence is high even though it is not as universally checked as some other features.
Clubhouse presence is supported by multiple listings that explicitly say 'clubhouse' or 'club house.' Some remarks also pair this with community-style amenities like meeting rooms and recreation spaces, reinforcing the building-level amenity.
No analysis available
Across all provided remarks, there are repeated references to the project being 'pet friendly' but no mention of any dog park, dog run, or designated dog exercise area. Given the absence of such mentions despite long amenity lists, and only a minority of MLS checkboxes indicating DGPRK, this appears to be a prior overcheck and is corrected to false.
No analysis available
This feature is repeatedly confirmed across the listings. Remarks mention 'fitness center,' 'gym,' 'fitness room,' 'exercise room,' and even 'weight room,' appearing in many different agent descriptions. The evidence is strong and consistent, not just a copy-paste one-off.
No analysis available
Evidence for a meeting room is moderate but real. One prominent remark explicitly lists 'meeting room,' and the surrounding amenity set includes other shared community spaces. This appears to be a legitimate building amenity rather than a mistaken checkbox.
Patio/deck-style outdoor space is strongly supported by the remarks. Many listings mention a "lanai" or "private lanai" for individual units, and several explicitly reference shared outdoor amenities like a "BBQ/Patio area," pavilion, and walking paths. The evidence appears consistent across many agents/listings, suggesting this is a real and recurring building feature.
Jogging/walking path evidence is limited but present. The strongest remark explicitly mentions "Walking Paths," which supports inclusion even though this amenity appears in only a few listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
A shared recreation area is well supported by the public remarks. Listings repeatedly reference 'recreation area,' 'recreation pavilion,' and similar amenity-space language. The consistency across listings makes this a strong building feature.
There is good evidence for a shared recreation room or similar indoor amenity. Several listings directly mention 'recreation room,' 'rec room,' or 'activities room,' and these references appear in more than one agent remark. The pattern supports a real building amenity rather than a stray checkbox.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sauna is one of the most consistently confirmed amenities in the remarks. Many listings mention 'sauna' alongside pool, jacuzzi, fitness center, and tennis courts. This is clear building-level evidence.
Storage is very strongly supported for Pearl Regency. I found explicit storage mentions in many listings, including "additional storage," "storage locker," "storage lockers," and "extra storage," with some remarks also noting bike/surfboard storage and assigned storage locker. The evidence appears consistent across multiple agents and is not just a single copy-paste anomaly.
Surfboard storage is directly confirmed. Multiple listings reference dedicated surfboard storage or a place to store surfboards, so this feature is well supported by the remarks.
Tennis courts are consistently described as part of the building amenities. Many listings explicitly say 'tennis courts' or 'tennis court,' sometimes alongside other shared facilities like pool, sauna, and gym. This is solid building-level evidence.
Trash chute is supported by the MLS amenities and explicit remark evidence. One listing directly includes 'trash chute' among the amenities, and the repeated MLS presence suggests it is a real building feature. While less frequently mentioned than pool or gym, the evidence is still solid.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Whirlpool/jacuzzi/hot tub amenities are repeatedly confirmed. Listings use multiple synonymous terms, including 'whirlpool,' 'jacuzzi,' and 'hot tub,' across different remarks. The evidence is strong and consistent.
The pool is strongly confirmed across the listing set. Dozens of current remarks explicitly mention it with phrases like "pool," "swimming pool," "resort-style amenities including a pool," and "large swimming pool," often from different agents and in multiple unit descriptions. This looks like consistent building-level amenity data rather than isolated copy-paste noise.
No analysis available
I searched for terms like saltwater pool, salt pool, or saline pool. The building repeatedly has a pool and jacuzzi, but there is no public remark indicating the pool is salt water.
In-unit laundry is strongly supported and consistently repeated across the current remarks. Well over a dozen listings explicitly mention it with direct phrases like “in-unit washer/dryer,” “stackable washer and dryer,” “W/D in Unit,” and “Laundry center in the unit,” indicating this is a real building feature rather than a copy-paste error. The evidence is broad and consistent across multiple listings and agents.
Confidence 88%: Only 1/20 current MLS listings mark COMLAU, while the remarks for many units emphasize in‑unit washer/dryers and never mention a common laundry room, suggesting that lone COMLAU entry is likely an agent error.
I looked for paid laundry language such as coin laundry, coin-op, quarters, card-operated machines, or laundry fees. The remarks instead reference in-unit laundry and washer/dryer setups, so there is no evidence of paid community laundry.
I searched the remarks for wording like "laundry on every floor," "laundry room on each floor," and similar phrases. The listings mention in-unit washer/dryer or laundry center in unit, but nothing indicates community laundry facilities on every floor.
Parking is clearly present throughout the building. Multiple remarks mention phrases like "1 open assigned parking stall," "two parking stalls," "2 covered parking stalls," and "guest parking," across many different listings and agents. The evidence is strong and consistent, not just a copied checkbox.
Assigned parking is strongly confirmed across the remarks, with many listings explicitly stating 'assigned parking stall,' 'assigned covered parking stall,' or '2 tandem parking stalls.' The evidence is consistent across many different agents and unit types, matching the prior high-confidence MLS pattern rather than looking like a single copy-paste error.
Covered parking is strongly confirmed across the remarks, with many listings explicitly mentioning covered stalls, garage-style parking, or covered assigned parking. Examples include '2 covered parking stalls,' '1 assigned, COVERED parking stall,' and 'one covered assigned parking stall,' indicating this is a building-level amenity rather than a one-off unit feature.
I looked for explicit deeded-parking wording such as deeded stall, owned parking, or parking included in the deed. The listings only describe assigned, covered, or tandem stalls, so deeded parking is not supported by the remarks.
No analysis available
I searched for parking fee language, including monthly parking charges or rental fees, but none was mentioned. The remarks discuss assigned and guest parking only, so no fee can be extracted.
Guest parking is consistently confirmed across many listings, with numerous agent remarks using phrases like 'ample guest parking,' 'lots of guest parking,' and 'plentiful Guest Parking.' The evidence appears broad and repetitive across multiple listings, suggesting a shared building amenity rather than copied checkbox noise.
There is solid evidence the building has secured access/security around the property, though remarks more often describe the building as secure rather than explicitly naming the parking entry itself. Because the MLS secured-entry flag appears in a meaningful minority of listings and multiple remarks reference security controls, this is supported with medium-high confidence.
Tandem parking is clearly available in the building, with multiple listings stating 'tandem' directly and often specifying two stalls. The consistency of wording across different remarks supports this as a real building feature available to some units, not just an isolated listing error.
No analysis available
I looked for parking waitlist references such as join a waitlist or parking waiting list, and found none. The listings instead emphasize ample guest parking and assigned stalls.
No analysis available
I looked for card/fob access wording such as keycard entry, fob access, or card-reader security. The remarks say the building is secured and has security guard/patrol/video surveillance, but they do not confirm a card-based access system.
Very strong evidence that Pearl Regency has security guard service. Well over a dozen current remarks explicitly mention security, including "24/7 security," "24-hour security," "security guard on site," and "security patrol," across many different listings and agents. The consistency of these remarks, together with the existing MLS amenities flag, indicates this is a real building-level feature rather than a copy-paste error.
This feature is clearly confirmed in the public remarks. One listing explicitly says "Security Patrol," and several others mention 24-hour security or security on site, which supports active patrol service.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listing remarks (at least 4 separate listings from different agents) explicitly advertise split/ductless systems with phrases like "SPLIT AC", "split ACs in bed and living area", and "split AC in both the living room and bedroom." Although only 2/20 MLS checkbox inclusions currently list ACSPL, the repeated explicit mentions across several remark sections indicate some units in the building do have split/ductless AC—so include the feature for buyers.
Window AC is strongly supported across the listings for Pearl Regency. At least 4-5 remarks explicitly mention it, including phrases like "AC WINDOW UNIT," "built-in window A/C," and "window AC unit," while many others mention new AC or cooling upgrades consistent with the same feature. The evidence is consistent across multiple listings and agents, not just a single copy-paste remark.
Construction concrete is strongly supported: current MLS data shows CONCRE in 20/20 listings. The remarks consistently refer to Pearl Regency as a high-rise/secured building with no conflicting material descriptions, so this appears to be a stable building-level characteristic rather than copy-paste error.
Only 3 of 20 current MLS listings include DOUWAL in construction materials, but none of the public remarks (0/20) mention 'double wall' or similar wording. Given the lack of descriptive remarks and no prior evidence, the 3 checklist entries appear inconsistent and likely erroneous, so double-wall construction is omitted for the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Only 2 of 20 current MLS records show ABOGRO and none of the public remarks reference 'above ground' construction or materials. Given the sparse MLS tagging and absence of remark corroboration, the evidence is weak and suggests the 'above ground' checkbox is likely an isolated or copy/paste error rather than a building-level characteristic.
There is no textual evidence in any of the public remarks that the building is constructed of brick or has a brick exterior. With 1/20 listings showing BRICK versus 20/20 showing CONCRETE for a 1981 high-rise, the brick entry appears to be a mis-checked MLS box, so brick construction is being corrected to false at the building level.
No analysis available
I searched for short-term rental indicators like STR permitted, legal vacation rental, NUC, TVU, or hotel-style rental terms, but found nothing. With no affirmative STR evidence in the remarks, this is treated as not allowed.
I looked for hotel pool language such as Hilton pool, Ritz pool, Trump pool, or hotel-managed rental programs, and found none. Because there is no evidence that STR is allowed, this must also be false.
I searched for language indicating a mandatory hotel or rental pool, such as required participation or cannot opt out, and found nothing. Since there is no STR evidence at all, mandatory pool participation is not supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for terms like lease expires, ground lease, leasehold, and renewal language, but found nothing in the public remarks. There is no specific year to extract from the listings.
The remarks clearly reference VA assumable loans, which is strong evidence that VA financing is available/accepted for this building. Multiple listings mention it, so this is high confidence.
Multiple listings directly state that the building is fully insured, with wording such as "100% hurricane insured," "100% hurricane coverage," and "full insurance coverage." This is strong, repeated evidence from the remarks, so confidence is very high.
Fire sprinklers are strongly supported by the listing remarks and historical MLS data. At least a dozen listings explicitly mention phrases like “fire sprinklers in every unit,” “building is sprinklered,” and “fire sprinklers have already been installed.” The evidence appears consistent across multiple agents rather than a single copy-paste source.
I looked for explicit fire/life safety evaluation language such as "FLSE passed," "passed fire inspection," or "life safety compliant," but the remarks do not contain any of those phrases. With no affirmative evidence in the listings, this is best treated as not confirmed in the public remarks.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Ocean views are strongly supported for this building. At least a dozen remarks explicitly reference ocean or ocean-harbor views, including phrases like "ocean views from the living room and bedroom," "panoramic ocean, harbor, city, coastline," and "gorgeous sunrises & sunsets lighting up the ocean sky." The evidence is consistent across multiple listings and agents, so this does not look like a copy-paste error.
Mountain views are strongly supported for Pearl Regency. Multiple listings explicitly mention "mountains," "mauka side," "breathtaking panoramic views of the mountains," and "gorgeous golf course and mountain views." The evidence appears consistent across many agents, not just a single copied remark.
No analysis available
City views are supported by both MLS data and public remarks. At least one listing explicitly says "relaxing city and Pearl Harbor views," which aligns with the building-level MLS trend. This suggests the feature is real and likely available in some units, even if not every listing mentions it.
Coastline views are supported, but the evidence is lighter than for mountain or city views. One listing explicitly states "ocean, harbor, city, coastline, and sunset views," while several others describe ocean or coastal views, suggesting some units do offer this outlook. The pattern is present across multiple remarks, but it is less consistently stated than the other views.
No analysis available
Golf course views are clearly present in Pearl Regency. Multiple listings explicitly mention "golf course views," "overlooking the golf course," "Pearl Country Club Golf Course," and "Pearl at Kalauao Golf Course." The volume and consistency of these remarks across different agents strongly confirm the feature.
No analysis available
Public remarks explicitly reference sunrise/morning sun (e.g., 'Sunrise & Sunset', 'calming dawns', 'calming dawns and peaceful dusks'), appearing across multiple listings. This indicates the building offers units with sunrise/eastern exposure.
Many listings explicitly advertise sunset views ('stunning sunsets over Pearl Harbor', 'sunsets lighting up the ocean sky', 'tropical sunset views'), with repeated mentions across different public remarks, indicating the building offers sunset/western-exposure units.
No analysis available
I searched for direct statements like "fireworks view," "watch fireworks from lanai," or seeing fireworks from the unit. The remarks discuss ocean, Pearl Harbor, golf course, and sunset views, but nothing about fireworks views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Resident manager presence is strongly supported by both the MLS amenities data and the remarks. Multiple listings explicitly mention an "on-site resident manager" or "resident manager," including phrases like "Resident Manager and Maintenance Team on site," "on-site resident manager," and "Managers Office," spread across many agents/listings. The consistency across listings suggests this is a real building feature rather than copy-paste noise.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.