Pearl Regency
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Pearl Regency
Building Overview
Pearl Regency in Downtown-Chinatown — concrete building (1981) with pool and fitness center.
About Pearl Regency
Pearl Regency is a residential building located in the Downtown‑Chinatown neighborhood. According to available records, it was built in 1981 and constructed of concrete. Size information (unit count or square footage) is not provided in the MLS data.
Based on MLS data, on-site amenities include a pool, fitness center, BBQ area, resident manager, and security guard. Units use window air conditioning. The building reports ocean, mountain, and sunset views for some units.
Parking is available and noted as covered and assigned, with guest parking also listed. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS. This summary is based on MLS data; buyers should verify all details, policies, fees, and availability with the listing agent or management.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I reviewed all public remarks for numeric or qualitative owner-occupancy information and found none. Because there is no explicit evidence in the remarks, the owner-occupancy percentage remains unknown.
I searched all public remarks for explicit elevator counts or phrases indicating number of elevators. Several listings mention proximity to or access to 'the elevator(s)' but none give a numeric count, so the number of elevators is unknown from the remarks.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Association_fee_includes currently lists OTCOEX (common area electricity) for 17/20 MLS entries, suggesting this is a standard building inclusion rather than a one-off agent checkbox. Across the provided remarks (covering dozens of units and multiple agents), no listing states that common-area electricity is billed separately or has recently changed. Given the strong, building-wide MLS pattern and no contradictory remarks, common area electricity remains included in the maintenance fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
11 of 20 current MLS listings include HOTWAT in association_fee_includes, but none of the public remarks explicitly state 'hot water included' or describe building-supplied hot water; one remark references an in-unit water heater. The evidence for maintenance including hot water is present in agent-entered MLS fields across multiple listings but not corroborated in public remarks, suggesting possible copy/paste; included with moderate confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 20 MLS listings mark SEWER as included in association fees, and several public remarks reference 'MANDATORY in-unit sewer upgrades have already been completed' and building-wide sewer/pipe replacement scheduled for 2027–2028. This consistent, multi-listing confirmation across agents and remarks gives high confidence that sewer is included in the maintenance fee.
All 20 MLS listings indicate WATER is included in association fees and no public remarks contradict this. The consistency across multiple agents/listings supports high confidence that water is included in the maintenance fee.
Strong evidence: 18 of 20 listings mention BBQ or grilling facilities (e.g., 'BBQ areas', 'BBQ grills', 'BBQ/Patio area'). Multiple listings from different agents reference shared BBQ spaces, indicating a building amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence: 14 of 20 listings reference a car wash area or station ('car wash', 'car wash area', 'car wash station'). Several independent remarks across listings confirm an on-site car wash amenity available to residents.
At least several listings cite a 'clubhouse' and 'recreation room/pavilion/center' among the amenities (e.g., 'clubhouse, BBQ area, and pavilion,' 'recreation center, tennis courts, playgrounds'). These independently written remarks, together with 11/20 MLS entries marking CLUHOU, confirm a shared clubhouse/recreation facility.
No analysis available
Across all provided remarks, there are repeated references to the project being 'pet friendly' but no mention of any dog park, dog run, or designated dog exercise area. Given the absence of such mentions despite long amenity lists, and only a minority of MLS checkboxes indicating DGPRK, this appears to be a prior overcheck and is corrected to false.
No analysis available
Strong evidence: 19 of 20 current listings list an exercise/fitness room (phrases: 'exercise room', 'fitness center', 'fitness room', 'gym'). Multiple independent remarks across listings corroborate the amenity, indicating building-level availability rather than isolated unit features.
No analysis available
Confidence 90%: Several listings refer to an “activities room,” “recreation room,” “clubhouse,” or “recreation center,” and 4/20 MLS listings mark MEEROO, suggesting a shared indoor gathering/meeting space.
No analysis available
One listing enumerates 'Walking Paths' alongside the pool, jacuzzi, tennis courts, playground, sauna, exercise room, car wash, and other amenities. Other remarks reference landscaped, resort-like grounds, so buyers can reasonably expect on-site walking paths suitable for strolling or light jogging.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Good evidence: 13 of 20 listings mention a recreation area or similar shared amenity (e.g., 'recreation area', 'recreation pavilion', 'recreation deck'). Multiple agent remarks corroborate this as a building-level amenity, though it's cited slightly less uniformly than core amenities.
Moderate evidence: 6 of 20 listings explicitly mention a recreation/rec room (phrases include 'recreation room', 'recreation center', 'activities room'). Several listings reference on-site recreation space, but mentions are less frequent, indicating the feature exists but is less consistently highlighted.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Frequent listing mentions (current MLS: 14/20) list 'sauna' among wellness amenities, often paired with the pool and exercise room. Multiple independent listings referencing a sauna support high confidence that a shared sauna exists in the building.
Historical MLS data showed storage-related checkboxes in 7 of 20 listings. Current listing remarks consistently reference building storage: phrases include "additional storage," "storage locker(s)," "storage lockers," and "bike, surfboard storage," appearing in at least a dozen separate listings, indicating the building offers storage/lockers as a shared amenity rather than a single-unit exception.
Multiple listings explicitly list surfboard or surf board storage among the amenities. Given the repeated explicit mentions across the remarks, this feature is marked true with high confidence.
Very strong evidence: 19 of 20 listings mention tennis courts (often 'tennis courts' or 'tennis/pickleball courts'). Repeated, consistent mentions across many listings and agents confirm the amenity is part of the building.
Solid evidence: current MLS shows 14/20 listings with TRASH CHUTE and at least one public remark explicitly lists 'TRASH CHUTE' in the amenity list. The prevalence across listings supports high confidence that the building has a shared trash/garbage chute system.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Good evidence: 12 of 20 listings mention a whirlpool/hot tub/jacuzzi (phrases: 'whirlpool', 'jacuzzi', 'hot tub'). Multiple listings pair the whirlpool with pool amenities, indicating an on-site spa feature for residents.
Strong, consistent evidence that Pearl Regency has a pool: 19/20 recent MLS listings included pool in amenities and almost every current public remark explicitly references a pool or related facilities (examples: "resort-style amenities including a pool", "swimming pool and jacuzzi", "kiddie pool"). Multiple agents consistently list the amenity rather than isolated or ambiguous mentions, supporting high confidence that the building offers a swimming pool.
No analysis available
Searched for terms like 'salt water pool', 'saltwater pool', 'salt pool' or 'saline pool'. The pool is described generically (pool, kiddie pool, jacuzzi/whirlpool) with no indication it is salt water.
High-confidence evidence that Pearl Regency units offer in-unit laundry: 20/20 MLS listings include washer/dryer and numerous remarks explicitly state phrases like "in-unit, side-by-side, full-size washer and dryer", "in-unit front load washer/dryer", and "full-size stackable washer/dryer". Mentions appear across multiple listings and agents, indicating the feature is widely available in the building rather than a copy-paste error.
Confidence 88%: Only 1/20 current MLS listings mark COMLAU, while the remarks for many units emphasize in‑unit washer/dryers and never mention a common laundry room, suggesting that lone COMLAU entry is likely an agent error.
Searched the remarks for terms indicating paid community laundry (coin-op, card operated, quarters, paid laundry). Listings emphasize in-unit laundry and general amenities but provide no indication of paid community laundry.
Searched the public remarks for phrases like 'laundry on each floor', 'laundry room on every floor', and 'floor-by-floor laundry'. Multiple ads mention in-unit washers/dryers and a 'laundry center in the unit' but none state laundry facilities on every floor.
Nearly every listing (19/20 per MLS flags) and numerous remarks explicitly state parking stalls (examples: 'two parking stalls', '2 covered parking stalls', '1 assigned parking stall'). Evidence is strong and consistent across multiple agent remarks, indicating the building offers parking for units.
At least ~15 listings (MLS) and many public remarks explicitly cite assigned stalls (quotes: '1 assigned parking stall', '2 ASSIGNED PARKING STALL - TANDEM', 'one assigned covered parking stall'). Strong, consistent evidence across listings that parking is frequently assigned/reserved.
At least ~10 listings explicitly reference covered parking (e.g., '2 covered parking stalls', '1 covered tandem parking', '2-car tandem covered parking stall'), with multiple agents and listings confirming covered/enclosed stalls—strong evidence that the building offers covered parking.
Listings repeatedly mention 'assigned' or 'covered/assigned parking stalls' and 'comes with' parking, but there is no explicit statement that parking is deeded. In absence of explicit 'deeded' language, parking_deeded is set to false with medium confidence.
No analysis available
I searched for phrases like 'parking fee', 'monthly parking charge', '$', or rental costs and found no references. There is no evidence in the public remarks to determine a parking fee amount.
Numerous listings (17/20 per MLS) and many remarks refer to generous visitor/guest parking (examples: 'generous guest parking', 'ample guest parking', '28 guest parking stalls', 'plenty of guest parking'), supporting high confidence that guest parking is available.
Moderate evidence: 8/20 MLS flags for secured entry and many agent remarks describe a 'secured, secure building', '24-hour security', and 'video surveillance' (quotes: 'secured building', '24-hour security', 'security with video surveillance'). However, explicit references to gated/card-access parking entry are rare, so confidence is implied rather than fully explicit.
Strong evidence across multiple listings that some units have tandem parking stalls (quotes: '2 ASSIGNED PARKING STALL - TANDEM', 'two parking stalls (tandem.)', '2-parking(tandem)'). At least several listings explicitly mention tandem configuration, so tandem parking is a building feature for some units.
No analysis available
I looked for terms such as 'parking waitlist' or 'join waitlist for parking' and found none. Given the absence of any waitlist language and plentiful guest/assigned parking references, parking_waitlist is set to false with medium confidence.
No analysis available
Searched remarks for 'key card access', 'fob access', 'card reader', and similar phrases. Listings repeatedly mention 24-hour security, secure lobby, and video surveillance, but there is no explicit reference to card/fob access systems.
Numerous recent listings explicitly mention staffed security such as "24/7 security," "24-hr security on site," "security guard on site," and "24-hour security with video surveillance." Other remarks describe a secured building with security patrol, secure lobby, and on-site staff, indicating active guard-based security rather than just controlled access. With consistent confirmation across many agents and listings, the building clearly provides on-site security guard service.
Numerous listings explicitly mention building security presence including 24-hour security, on-site security guards, security patrol, and video surveillance. This supports a high-confidence true value for security patrol.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence that units in the building have window air conditioning: MLS history lists ACWIUN in 18/20 listings and numerous public remarks explicitly state "AC WINDOW UNIT", "window A/C", or "window AC unit." Mentions appear in listings from multiple agents and are corroborated by both historical checkbox data and repeated remarks, indicating the feature is broadly present in the building.
All 20 current MLS listings for Pearl Regency indicate construction material = CONCRE (20/20). While the public remarks rarely—if ever—explicitly state "concrete" or "reinforced concrete," the uniform MLS checkbox across many different listings/agents provides overwhelming evidence the building is concrete. Confidence is high (0.95) due to perfect agreement in MLS construction_materials and prior high-confidence assessments.
Only 3 of 20 current MLS listings include DOUWAL in construction materials, but none of the public remarks (0/20) mention 'double wall' or similar wording. Given the lack of descriptive remarks and no prior evidence, the 3 checklist entries appear inconsistent and likely erroneous, so double-wall construction is omitted for the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is no textual evidence in any of the public remarks that the building is constructed of brick or has a brick exterior. With 1/20 listings showing BRICK versus 20/20 showing CONCRETE for a 1981 high-rise, the brick entry appears to be a mis-checked MLS box, so brick construction is being corrected to false at the building level.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for explicit STR language (e.g., 'short-term rental allowed', 'vacation rental', 'TVU/NUC', '30-day minimum') and found none. Therefore STR allowance cannot be confirmed and is set to false with medium confidence due to absence of evidence.
I looked for terms like 'hotel rental pool', 'hotel rental program', or specific hotel-brand pool participation and found none. Because STR is not indicated, hotel-pool participation is set to false with medium confidence.
I searched for 'mandatory hotel pool', 'required to participate', or language indicating mandatory rental program and found none. With no evidence of STR or a hotel pool, mandatory pool participation is false with medium confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for phrases like 'lease expires', 'land lease to', 'ground lease ends', or specific expiry years and found none. No lease expiry year can be determined from the public remarks.
Public remarks explicitly reference VA assumable loans in multiple listings, indicating the project accepts VA financing. This is strong direct evidence from the remarks.
Several listings explicitly state the building is fully insured/hurricane insured or has 100% coverage, so the building is recorded as fully insured (walls-in/full coverage) with high confidence based on the direct remarks.
Strong, consistent evidence across listings: roughly 15–18 separate public remarks explicitly reference sprinklers with phrases like 'building is sprinklered', 'fire sprinklers', 'sprinklers in each unit', and 'in-unit fire sprinklers'. Mentions appear across multiple agents/listings (not isolated), confirming the historical high-confidence MLS checkbox data.
Remarks repeatedly reference fire safety features (sprinklers, PA speaker alarms, updated sprinklers) but do not explicitly state that the building passed a Fire/Life Safety Evaluation (FLSE) or passed a fire/life safety inspection. Because the FLSE pass is only determinable from an explicit remark and no such remark exists, I report false with medium confidence (absence of an explicit FLSE pass statement).
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Numerous public remarks explicitly reference ocean/harbor views (e.g., 'Stunning Views of Pearl Harbor, Ocean', 'panoramic ocean, harbor, city', 'ocean vistas'). Evidence appears in multiple independent listings/remarks by different agents, confirming the building offers ocean-view units.
Multiple listings in the provided remarks explicitly mention mountain/mauka views and Diamond Head (e.g., 'mauka side', 'breathtaking panoramic views of the mountains', 'Diamond Head'). Evidence appears across many different listings/agents rather than a single copy-paste, supporting a high-confidence inclusion of mountain views.
No analysis available
Several listings explicitly mention city/downtown/cityscape views (for example, 'relaxing city and Pearl Harbor views' and other panoramic view descriptions including city). These repeated, explicit remarks from multiple listings support a high-confidence true value for city views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Numerous listings explicitly mention views of the Pearl Country Club / Pearl at Kalauao golf course (phrases like 'golf course views', 'overlooking the Pearl at Kalauao Country Club', 'Pearl Country Club Golf Course'). This consistent, repeated mention across multiple listings supports adding golf course views with high confidence.
No analysis available
Public remarks explicitly reference sunrise/morning sun (e.g., 'Sunrise & Sunset', 'calming dawns', 'calming dawns and peaceful dusks'), appearing across multiple listings. This indicates the building offers units with sunrise/eastern exposure.
Many listings explicitly advertise sunset views ('stunning sunsets over Pearl Harbor', 'sunsets lighting up the ocean sky', 'tropical sunset views'), with repeated mentions across different public remarks, indicating the building offers sunset/western-exposure units.
No analysis available
Searched for references to 'fireworks', 'Friday night fireworks', and similar phrases. Although many listings mention ocean/harbor/sunset views, none explicitly state that fireworks can be seen from the building or units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings (at least ~6–12) explicitly mention an on-site or resident manager using phrases such as 'on-site resident manager', 'resident manager', and 'Managers Office'. The references are consistent across listings and agents, aligning with the historical high-confidence MLS checkbox data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.