Pearl 2
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Pearl 2
Building Overview
Pearl 2 in Downtown-Chinatown, a 1975 concrete building with pool and ocean/mountain views.
About Pearl 2
Based on MLS data, Pearl 2 is located in the Downtown-Chinatown neighborhood and was built in 1975. The building is constructed of concrete. Unit size and count were not provided in the available MLS records.
According to available records, key on-site features include a pool, BBQ area, resident manager, and security guard. Units report window air conditioning and a variety of views including ocean, mountain, and sunset.
MLS data indicates parking is available, covered, assigned, and includes guest parking. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS. This summary is based on MLS data; buyers should verify all details, rules, and fees with the listing agent or management.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit owner-occupancy percentages and qualitative descriptions like "majority owner occupied" or "highly owner occupied," but found none. The remarks focus on amenities, security, and unit upgrades rather than ownership mix.
I searched the public remarks for explicit elevator counts or phrases like "multiple elevators" and found none. The remarks do mention a parking structure elevator in one listing, but that refers to the garage, not a verified building elevator count.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
None of the public remarks (0/~40 listings reviewed) state that cable TV is included. Current MLS shows CABTV in only 1/20 listings, suggesting most agents have not indicated it. Given no historical confidence and no corroborating remarks, it's likely an MLS checkbox error and cable-included should be omitted.
Strong MLS evidence supports this feature: 15/20 current listings check OTCOEX in association_fee_includes. The remarks do not directly say “common area electricity,” so this is driven mainly by the repeated MLS checkbox pattern rather than agent narrative, suggesting a building-level inclusion rather than a unit-specific claim.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence is strong and explicit: at least one remark directly says HOA dues include hot water, and 12/20 current MLS entries list HOTWAT. The presence of WTRHTR in only 2/20 listings does not outweigh the direct statement and broader MLS pattern. This is a building-level utility inclusion with clear support.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Very strong evidence supports sewer inclusion: 19/20 current listings include SEWER in the HOA/association fee data. A public remark directly confirms it with the phrase “HOA dues include water, sewer and hot water,” making this a high-confidence building feature.
Water inclusion is strongly supported by the data: 19/20 current listings include WATER in association_fee_includes. The remarks also directly confirm it, including the exact phrase “HOA dues include water, sewer and hot water,” so this appears to be a stable building-level feature.
Strong, repeated evidence across the remarks confirms BBQ/grilling amenities at the building. Many listings mention phrases like 'BBQ area,' 'barbecue area,' and 'rec/bbq/picnic area,' indicating this is a shared building amenity rather than a one-off unit feature. The MLS data is also highly consistent, with 16/20 current listings showing BBQ.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is solid though less frequent evidence for a clubhouse/community room type amenity. One listing explicitly mentions 'club house,' while others describe a community gathering room or recreation room, suggesting the building has a shared clubhouse-style space. The MLS data supports this with 9/20 listings checking clubhouse.
No analysis available
Dog park evidence is very strong and appears consistently across multiple listings. Remarks repeatedly use explicit phrases like 'dog park' and 'huge fully fenced-in dog park,' confirming this as a shared amenity. The MLS data is also strong at 13/20 listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
This is well supported by the remarks and the MLS pattern: 13/20 current listings reference a recreation area or similar shared amenity. Phrases like "recreation area," "big recreation pavilion area," and "rec area" appear across multiple listings, indicating a genuine building feature.
The building appears to have a recreation room, though it is not as consistently advertised as some other amenities. Current remarks specifically cite "recreation room," "community gathering room," and similar wording in several listings, supporting that it is a real shared feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sauna is consistently supported by both the MLS data and the remarks, with 12/20 current listings checking it. Many descriptions explicitly say "sauna" alongside pool and whirlpool, making this a reliable shared building amenity.
Storage units/lockers are consistently mentioned across numerous listings for Pearl 2. At least several remarks say "same-floor storage locker," "deeded storage," "extra storage," or "additional storage on same floor," which strongly indicates the building offers storage for residents. The repeated references across multiple agents look consistent and not like a copy-paste anomaly.
I looked for surfboard-storage-related phrases such as "surfboard storage," "board storage," and "surf storage." The remarks only reference general storage lockers/units, with no public-remarks evidence of surfboard storage facilities.
Evidence is overwhelming that the building offers tennis facilities. Multiple remarks mention tennis courts directly, sometimes alongside pickleball, which strongly supports the amenity as a shared building feature. This aligns with the MLS data showing tennis in 18/20 listings.
Trash chute service is well supported by both the remarks and the MLS data. While fewer public remarks mention it directly, one listing explicitly says 'Trash chutes,' and the MLS checkbox data is strong at 16/20 listings. This is enough to treat it as a building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The building clearly offers a whirlpool/spa-style amenity. Multiple listings explicitly mention 'whirlpool' or 'hot tub,' and several describe 'pool/spa,' which is consistent with a shared recreational amenity. The MLS data supports this strongly with 13/20 listings.
Pool is strongly supported for this building. Roughly every listing includes it, with repeated phrases like "cool off in the pool," "swimming pool," "heated pool," and "large pool with whirlpool" across many different remarks. The evidence is consistent across multiple agents and is not just a one-off copy-paste error.
No analysis available
I searched for salt-water pool language such as "salt water pool," "saltwater pool," or "saline pool." The remarks repeatedly mention a pool, heated pool, whirlpool, and spa, but nothing indicates the pool is salt water.
Strong building-level evidence supports in-unit laundry. The current MLS summary indicates 19 of 20 recent listings include washer/dryer, and numerous remarks across different listings confirm it with phrases like 'in-unit washer/dryer,' 'washer & dryer in unit,' 'new full-size W/D in the unit,' and 'stacked washer & dryer in unit.' This appears consistent across multiple agents rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
No analysis available
I looked for references to paid community laundry such as coin-op, card-operated, or quarters-based laundry. The remarks only describe in-unit washer/dryer or general amenity/storage details, so there is no evidence that community laundry requires payment.
I searched the public remarks for phrases like "laundry on every floor," "laundry on each floor," and similar wording. The listings mention in-unit washer/dryer and storage, but there is no public-remarks evidence that community laundry facilities exist on every floor.
Parking is clearly available in this building. Across the provided remarks, many listings explicitly mention parking, including "2 parking stalls," "one assigned covered parking stall," "covered/secure parking stall," and "covered/garage parking." The evidence is consistent across multiple agents and does not look like a copy-paste error.
Assigned/reserved parking is very well supported across the building. Multiple listings explicitly mention phrases like "assigned covered parking stall," "one assigned garage parking stall," "reserved covered parking stall," and "deeded storage... one assigned covered parking stall," showing consistent evidence from many agents rather than a one-off copy/paste.
Covered parking is strongly established for this building. Remarks repeatedly cite "covered parking stall," "covered/secure parking stall," "covered/garage parking," "secured parking garage," and multiple units with two covered stalls, making this a consistent building feature across many listings.
I looked for explicit deeded-parking language such as "deeded parking," "owned stall," or "parking included in deed." The remarks repeatedly describe assigned, covered, secure, and garage parking stalls, but none clearly state that the parking is deeded.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for any mention of a parking fee, rental rate, or separate monthly parking charge. The listings discuss included/assigned stalls and guest parking, but no parking fee is stated.
Guest parking is supported by both MLS flags and repeated remark language. Listings mention "18 guest parking stalls," "tons of guest parking," "ample guest parking," "lots of guest parking," and "additional parking stalls are available for guests and loading," indicating this is a shared building amenity rather than isolated unit-level copy.
Moderately strong evidence: 7/20 MLS listings flagged secured entry and several remarks explicitly mention secure access (quotes: "secured entry", "intercom entry, requiring a keycard for access", "covered secure parking stalls"). Multiple agents reference building security, indicating secured entry/access for parking is a real building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for phrases like "parking waitlist," "waiting list," or instructions to join a parking queue. The remarks do not mention any parking waitlist process, so there is no evidence that one exists.
No analysis available
The remarks explicitly mention keycard access, which directly indicates a card/fob security system. This is strong public-remarks evidence for security card access.
No analysis available
I looked for security patrol, roving security, or patrolled-building language. While the exact phrase "security patrol" is not used, repeated references to 24/7 security and security guards support the presence of patrol-style security service.
No analysis available
No analysis available
One listing explicitly states 'Three Split AC Systems' (unit upgraded in 2019). Overall MLS checkbox is set in 1 of 20 listings; multiple other listings reference window/wall A/C or single 120V AC units rather than ductless mini-splits. Evidence shows at least some units have split (ductless) AC, but the feature is only mentioned by a single listing across the dataset.
Window-style air conditioning is strongly supported across the listing remarks. At least 3 listings explicitly mention it with wording such as "new window A/C," "window ACs," and "new window/wall A/C," and another notes an "a/c unit in each room." The consistency across multiple remarks supports that this building offers window AC units.
Concrete construction is strongly supported at the building level. The current remarks explicitly say "solid concrete construction" and "solid concrete walls," matching the long-standing MLS pattern of 20/20 listings showing CONCRE. This appears to be consistent across multiple listings rather than copy-paste error.
There is no meaningful remark-based evidence for double wall construction in the listings provided. The MLS signal is weak at only 2/20 listings, and the public descriptions focus on concrete construction, views, and amenities rather than any double-wall structure. This looks more like an isolated checkbox entry than a confirmed building-level feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Limited and inconsistent MLS checkbox data (3/20 listings) with no supporting language in agent remarks. Because public remarks do not mention "above ground" construction and historical confidence is absent, there is insufficient evidence to assert the building offers an above-ground construction feature; agents may have inconsistently checked the box.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for short-term rental indicators such as STR allowed, NUC, TVU, vacation rental wording, or minimum-stay exceptions. The remarks do not mention short-term rental permission, so it cannot be confirmed as allowed from the public text.
There is no indication of a hotel rental pool, hotel-managed program, or branded resort operation in the remarks. Since STR is not evidenced here, hotel pool participation must be false.
I looked for language showing required participation in a rental pool or hotel program, but found none. The remarks do not suggest any mandatory rental-pool obligation, and the STR-related features are not supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the public remarks for leasehold language such as "lease expires," "ground lease," "leasehold," and renewal dates, but found nothing. There is no public evidence here to determine a land lease expiry year, so the value remains unknown.
The public remarks clearly support VA financing approval for this building. I found direct references to both VA approval and VA assumable loans across multiple listings, which is strong evidence that VA loans are accepted.
The first remark directly states that the unit is "fully insured," which strongly supports this building-level coverage feature. No contradictory language appears in the remarks, so this is a high-confidence match.
No analysis available
I looked for language indicating the building passed a fire/life safety evaluation or similar safety certification, but nothing in the public remarks supports that. There are mentions of security, resident manager, and secured access, but those are not evidence of an FLSE pass.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Strong building-level evidence for ocean views. Well over a dozen remarks mention “ocean views,” “harbor views,” “Pearl Harbor views,” or “ocean, mountain, and Pearl Harbor views,” indicating this is a common and recurring feature rather than a one-off claim.
Multiple listings (many separate remarks) explicitly mention "mountain views," "majestic mountains," and "mauka/mountain views," including high-floor and mid-floor units. This consistent, repeated language across agents indicates the building offers mountain-view units.
No analysis available
There is solid evidence that some units in the building have city views. Multiple listings mention phrases like “Views of City, Mountain and Ocean” and “harbor and city views,” which supports a building-level city-view feature even though not every unit has it.
No analysis available
High-confidence historical data combined with numerous remarks mentioning "garden," "beautiful well-kept grounds," "lanai overlooking garden space," and "tropical garden feel" across listings confirms the building offers garden/courtyard/landscaped views for some units.
Multiple listings for this building explicitly advertise golf course views, with at least 8–10 units described as having “golf course views,” “scenic golf course views,” or “views of a lush golf course” from their lanais and windows. This language appears in varied, agent-written remarks (not just a single template), strongly indicating that certain orientations in this building offer genuine golf course views. Buyers seeking golf course outlooks would reasonably consider this a building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Current remarks support sunset views in the building, including explicit phrases such as “captivating sunsets every evening,” “breathtaking views of the sunset,” and references to “Friday night fireworks.” This appears to be a real and marketable feature for at least some units, not just MLS copy-paste noise.
No analysis available
At least one listing directly states that fireworks can be seen from the balcony/unit, which satisfies the requirement that the view is from the building. This is strong explicit evidence from public remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence supports a resident manager on-site. Multiple listings explicitly mention an "on-site manager," "on-site resident manager," or "resident manager," and this appears consistently across many agents rather than as a one-off remark. Historical MLS data is also very strong, with RESMAN present in 19/20 listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.