Pearl 1
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Pearl 1
Building Overview
Pearl 1 in Aiea (built 1975) — concrete construction offering pool access and ocean, mountain and sunset views.
About Pearl 1
Pearl 1 is a residential building located in Aiea, built in 1975 and constructed of concrete. According to available records, the building offers ocean, mountain and sunset views.
Key on-site amenities listed in MLS records include a pool, BBQ area, a resident manager and a security guard. Units are reported to use window air conditioning.
Parking is available with covered, assigned stalls and guest parking. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS data. Based on MLS data analysis, buyers should verify all details, rules and current conditions with listing agents or management.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for owner-occupancy indicators such as a percentage, "majority owner occupied," or "highly owner occupied," but found none. With no explicit occupancy data in the remarks, the owner-occupancy rate cannot be determined.
I searched the public remarks for explicit elevator counts such as "4 elevators," "multiple elevators," or similar wording, but found none. Since there is no current value provided here and no remark evidence, the elevator count remains unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Support for common-area electricity is moderate-to-strong from MLS data: 14 of 20 current listings include OTCOEX. The public remarks mostly focus on amenities and security rather than utility inclusions, so this looks like an MLS-based building feature rather than something frequently described in agent copy.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Hot water inclusion is supported by both the MLS and the remarks. One listing explicitly states the fee covers 'hot water,' while the current MLS data shows 13 of 20 listings with HOTWAT and zero WTRHTR flags, which fits a building-supplied hot water setup.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer inclusion is extremely strong. Nineteen of 20 current listings include SEWER, and the remarks reinforce this with direct language about the maintenance fee covering sewer. This is consistent across many listings and does not look like a copy-paste anomaly.
Water inclusion is extremely well supported. Nineteen of 20 current listings include WATER, and one public remark directly says the maintenance fee covers water. The evidence is consistent across the dataset and appears reliable for this building.
BBQ is very strongly supported across the remarks, appearing in well over 20 listings in forms like "BBQ area," "BBQ grills," "picnic and BBQ areas," and "outdoor grills." The evidence is consistent across multiple agents and looks like a real shared building amenity rather than copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Car wash is directly mentioned in at least one current listing as an amenity, and the historical MLS data also supports it. While not as widely repeated as BBQ or pool-related amenities, the explicit wording makes this feature credible.
Clubhouse is supported by several current remarks, including explicit references to a "clubhouse" and "sports court with club house." The evidence is not as frequent as BBQ or recreation area, but it appears repeatedly enough to treat as a real shared amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings explicitly mention a lanai or covered lanai (phrases: "open lanai," "private lanai," "covered lanai," "large lanai"), and building amenities are repeatedly listed as picnic/BBQ areas, cabana, and recreation areas next to the pool. While only 5/20 MLS checkbox entries show PATDEC/COVPAT, the public remarks across the majority of listings consistently describe outdoor spaces and shared decks/patios, so evidence is strong that the building offers patio/deck amenities.
This feature is supported by an explicit remark stating "walking/jogging path." It appears only in a small number of listings, so the evidence is narrower than the main amenities, but the wording is direct and clear.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Recreation area is repeatedly mentioned in the current remarks, with phrases such as "recreation area," "recreation space," and "recreational area" appearing in many listings. This is consistent across multiple agents and aligns with the strong historical MLS pattern.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage is consistently supported across the listings. Multiple remarks explicitly mention "storage locker on the same floor," "additional storage locker," and "storage space," which aligns with the historical MLS data showing storage in amenities/unit features. This appears to be a real building feature rather than a one-off agent copy-paste detail.
I searched for surfboard storage, board storage, surf storage, or combined bike-and-surfboard storage wording and found nothing. No public remarks mention any surfboard storage facilities.
Tennis court access is supported by multiple current listings, with explicit mentions such as "tennis court," "tennis courts," and "basketball/tennis court." While not present in every remark, the repeated references across several agents make this a credible building amenity. The evidence is consistent with the historical MLS checkbox data.
Trash chute is explicitly confirmed in current remarks, including a listing that says amenities include "trash chute." Historical data also shows strong support, so this appears to be a stable building feature rather than a checkbox error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Pool is strongly supported for Pearl One. Well over 20 listings mention it across many different remarks, with consistent phrases like 'swimming pool,' 'pool,' and 'heated pool,' suggesting this is a real shared building amenity rather than copy-paste error. The current MLS remarks reinforce the historical data, so confidence remains very high.
No analysis available
I searched for saltwater pool language such as salt water, saltwater, saline, or salt pool and found nothing. The building clearly has a pool, but the remarks do not identify it as a saltwater pool.
Laundry-in-unit is strongly supported for Pearl One. Dozens of current remarks explicitly mention it across many listings, including phrases like "in-unit washer and dryer," "washer/dryer in unit," "stacked washer dryer," and "brand new in-unit washer and dryer." The evidence is consistent across multiple agents and listing periods, so this appears to be a genuine building-level feature available in many units.
No analysis available
I looked for coin-op, coin laundry, quarters, card-operated machines, laundry fees, or other paid laundry references and found none. Several listings mention in-unit washer/dryer instead, but there is no evidence of paid community laundry service.
I searched the public remarks for language like "laundry on every floor," "laundry room on each floor," or similar floor-by-floor community laundry wording and found nothing. The remarks only mention in-unit washer/dryer in several listings, which does not support community laundry on every floor.
No analysis available
Assigned parking is very strongly supported for Pearl One. Multiple listings explicitly mention "one assigned parking stall," "1-assigned parking stall," and even "TWO ASSIGNED PARKING STALLS," indicating this is not a one-off agent checkbox. The evidence is consistent across many remarks and appears to be reliable rather than copy-paste noise.
Covered parking is well supported across the listing set. Remarks frequently say "2 covered parking stalls," "1 covered parking stall," "covered parking structure," and "ground level in the secure gated garage," which strongly confirms the building offers covered parking. The evidence is broad and repeated across multiple agents.
The listings show that units come with assigned or covered stalls and sometimes multiple stalls, but they do not explicitly state that parking is deeded. Because current analysis previously leaned true and there is no contrary evidence, I am keeping it true but with low confidence.
No analysis available
I looked for any explicit monthly parking charge, rental amount, or parking fee, but none was provided. The remarks only indicate that extra parking may be rented through management, without a price.
Guest parking is clearly supported for Pearl One. Many listings directly state "guest parking available," "ample guest parking," or "lots of guest parking," and several also note visitor parking or street parking nearby. The repeated mentions across separate listings make this a strong building-level amenity.
Secured entry/access is strongly supported in the remarks. Listings mention "24-hour secured entry," "secured key entry," "secured entrance," "key fob," and "secured building," often alongside security patrol, cameras, and guards. While some wording refers to the building generally rather than parking specifically, the access-control evidence is consistent and strong enough to keep this feature included.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for mentions of a parking waitlist, waiting list, or instructions to join one, and found none. The remarks only discuss guest parking and extra stalls available for rent.
No analysis available
The remarks repeatedly support card/fob-style access security, including explicit references to "secured key entry" and a building accessed via "key fob." This is strong evidence that the building has card/fob access security.
Strong evidence supports security guard service at Pearl One. Multiple current listings explicitly mention phrases like "security guard & video cameras," "dedicated security personnel," "24-hour secured entry," "security patrol," and "24/7 video surveillance." The feature is confirmed across many agent remarks, so it should remain included.
One listing explicitly says residents benefit from "security patrol," which directly matches the feature definition. That is sufficient to confirm security patrol service from public remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
While only 1/20 current MLS inclusion flags list ACSPL, at least 3 separate listing remarks explicitly reference split/ductless systems (phrases: "split AC", "2 recently installed split Air Conditioners", "split AC in the living room"). Evidence indicates some units do have mini-split systems, but the feature is not yet widespread in MLS checkbox data so confidence is moderate.
Window AC is strongly supported for Pearl One. Multiple listings explicitly mention it across different agents and time periods, with phrases like “new window A/C units,” “two window A/C units,” “window AC units,” and “newly installed window air conditioners.” This looks consistent rather than copy-paste noise, so the feature should be included with very high confidence.
Strong building-level evidence supports concrete construction. Historical MLS data shows 19/20 listings marked construction_materials as CONCRE, and the current remarks consistently reference Pearl One/Pearl 1 without any indication of a material change. This appears to be stable MLS data rather than agent copy-paste error.
Weak/contradicted signal: only 2 of 20 MLS entries mark DOUWAL and none of the public remarks (0/ many) mention 'double wall' or 'double-wall construction.' Given the rarity of double-wall construction in similar high-rise buildings and lack of corroborating remarks, the evidence does not support including double-wall as a building feature.
No analysis available
Across 20 recent listings, 6 checked the MASSTU construction field but 14 did not, and no remarks mention masonry or stucco construction anywhere. Because building construction is a major attribute that would typically be consistent across listings, this scattered checkbox usage without any supporting description suggests MASSTU was selected in error. On balance, the evidence indicates the building should not be categorized as masonry and stucco.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
MLS currently shows ABOGRO on 3 of 20 listings, but many remarks repeatedly mention '20th floor', 'top floor', 'high floor', covered/gated garage and multi-story/high-rise amenities—consistent with an above-ground building. Checkbox usage is inconsistent across agents, so evidence is implied rather than explicitly stated in most remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the public remarks for any indication that short-term rentals are allowed, such as STR, NUC, TVU, or vacation-rental wording, but found nothing. Since there is no affirmative evidence, I cannot mark STR as allowed.
I looked for hotel rental pool references such as Hilton, Ritz, Trump, or any managed rental program, and found none. Because there is no evidence STR is allowed here, hotel pool participation must be false.
I searched for wording like mandatory pool, required rental program, cannot opt out, or must rent, and found nothing. With no evidence of STR eligibility or hotel-pool participation, mandatory pool is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for leasehold wording such as lease expires, ground lease ends, renewed through, or a specific expiration year, but found nothing. Based on the public remarks alone, the lease expiry year cannot be determined.
Public remarks repeatedly confirm VA eligibility for this building. There are also several references to VA assumable loans, which strongly supports VA loan approval from the listings themselves.
Multiple remarks explicitly state the building is fully insured, including wording like "Building is fully insured with no upcoming special assessments" and "100% hurricane insurance coverage." This is strong, direct evidence from the public remarks, so confidence is very high.
No analysis available
I looked for fire/life safety language such as FLSE passed, fire safety certified, life safety compliant, or passed fire inspection, but found nothing in the remarks. There is no evidence from the listings to confirm the building has passed a fire/life safety evaluation.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Strong building-level evidence for ocean views. Roughly 10+ of the provided remarks mention ocean/harbor/Pearl Harbor views, including phrases like 'partial ocean,' 'stunning panoramic ocean,' and 'breathtaking harbor vistas.' The evidence appears consistent across multiple agents and is not limited to a single listing.
Very strong evidence that Pearl One offers mountain views in some units. Across many listings, agents and sellers describe 'mountain views,' 'mauka views,' 'mountain ranges and lush green ridgelines,' and 'mountain range from your lanai,' which is consistent with the existing high-confidence MLS data. The repeated references across multiple remarks suggest this is a real building feature rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
No analysis available
There is solid evidence for city views in the building. Several listings explicitly mention 'city views' or 'mountain and city views,' and one states 'stunning panoramic ocean, city, and mountain views.' The evidence is consistent enough across multiple listings to support the feature as a building-level offering.
Clear evidence the building offers coastline/harbor views: multiple listings explicitly reference "Pearl Harbor," "harbor views," and "ocean" (quotes include "views of Pearl Harbor" and "beautiful harbor views"). Though fewer listings list COASTL in the MLS (3/20), the repeated explicit remarks across agents and prior high-confidence data indicate some units have coastline/harbor views.
There is credible evidence that the building offers garden/greenery-type views, though less frequently than mountain views. Several listings reference 'serene garden view,' 'lush greens,' 'fully landscaped areas,' and 'green belt view,' indicating some units overlook landscaped or garden-like surroundings. The pattern is consistent enough to include the feature, but confidence is slightly lower than mountain views.
Several listings (at least 5–8) explicitly reference golf-course views or proximity — key phrases include "overlooking Pearl at Kalauao Golf Course," "overlooking Pearl Country Club," and repeated mentions of being near Pearl Country Club / golf course. Given prior high confidence and consistent remarks across multiple agents, the building offers units with golf course views.
No analysis available
Moderate evidence the building offers sunrise/morning/eastern exposure: 4 of 20 current MLS view_descriptions include SUNRIS and several remarks use phrases like 'from sunrise to sunset' or 'Sunrise views'. The evidence is present but less widespread than mountain-view claims, so confidence is moderate.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for explicit remarks showing fireworks can be seen from units, such as "fireworks view" or "watch fireworks from the lanai," and found nothing. There are many view mentions, but none specifically indicate fireworks views from the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence supports a resident manager on-site. Dozens of current remarks explicitly mention "on-site manager," "resident manager," or "on site resident manager," and this appears consistently across multiple listings and agents rather than a one-off note. This aligns with the historical MLS amenity data, so the feature should be kept as true with very high confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.