Pavilion at Waikiki

All available MLS records consistently list 1975 as the construction year for this building. No listing remarks indicate a different build year or full reconstruction that would override this.

Multiple listings reference a '28th floor rooftop pool' and a 'Penthouse unit on the 28th floor,' confirming the building tops out at the 28th floor. No remarks suggest any higher occupied floors, and all high-floor references are at or below 28.

Remarks for different listings repeatedly state that the Pavilion at Waikiki has '155 units in the building.' The repetition of '155 units, 10 guest parking stalls' across multiple listings strongly supports 155 as the total unit count.

I searched for an explicit owner-occupancy figure such as a percentage or wording like "80% owner occupied," but none was provided. The remarks mention many full-time residents and at least one tenant-occupied unit, so the current 43.0 value is retained with low confidence.

The public remarks directly confirm that the building has 2 elevators. I found an explicit elevator count in the listing text, so no inference was needed.

Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.

Central air conditioning is one of the most consistently mentioned included utilities, with numerous remarks stating "central AC" or maintenance fees including "air conditioning." The repetition across many listings makes this a very strong building-level feature.

Cable TV inclusion is repeatedly stated across the listings, with multiple agents writing phrases like "Cable TV," "basic cable," and "cable TV service" included in the maintenance fee. This appears consistent across many remarks rather than a one-off copy-paste.

There is direct support, but it is less universal than utilities like water and sewer. At least a few remarks explicitly list "Common Area Expenses" or "other common expenses" among the included maintenance items, suggesting this is a real building-level inclusion that some agents copy into the remarks.

All available information characterizes the building as fee simple condominiums rather than a cooperative. With no MLS flags for COOTAX and no remarks about co-op taxes, there is strong evidence that cooperative taxes are not part of the maintenance fees.

Electricity inclusion is confirmed in many remarks, often listed alongside water, sewer, cable, and internet. The consistency across listings suggests this is a standard included utility for the building.

Gas is not supported by the public remarks reviewed here. Listings repeatedly enumerate included utilities, but gas is absent even where other utilities are clearly named, so the building does not appear to include gas in maintenance fees.

Hot water is repeatedly confirmed across many listings, often grouped with water, sewer, electricity, cable, and internet. Several remarks explicitly say "hot water" is included, so this appears to be a consistent building feature rather than a one-off agent entry.

Internet service is repeatedly listed as included, sometimes as "high-speed internet" or bundled with cable. This is consistent across multiple agents and appears to be a standard included service.

The building is described as a Waikiki high-rise near parks, beaches, and shopping, with no reference to marina facilities or boat access. With zero MLS marina flags and no textual evidence, marina fees are not part of the maintenance charges.

Sewer inclusion is strongly and consistently supported across the listing set. Multiple remarks explicitly list sewer alongside water and electricity, indicating this is a stable building-level utility inclusion.

Water inclusion is one of the most consistent items in the remarks and MLS data. Listings repeatedly note that maintenance fees cover water, often together with sewer and hot water, making this a high-confidence building feature.

BBQ is consistently confirmed across the current remarks, with well over a dozen listings referencing it. Key phrases include "BBQ area," "barbecue areas," "BBQ grill," "BBQ stations," and "community electric grills," often tied to the rooftop amenity deck. The repeated mentions from multiple listings and agents strongly support that the building offers shared grilling facilities.

At least five listings explicitly reference bike-related storage, including 'bike/surf rack available', 'storage for surfboards and bicycles (waitlisted)', 'bicycle storage', and 'bike storage areas'. The consistent mention of dedicated bike/surf storage across multiple units and agents indicates that secure bicycle storage is a real, established building amenity despite being unchecked in the MLS fields.

Remarks focus on views of the Ala Wai Canal and proximity to beaches, not on any docking or marina facilities. With no textual or MLS evidence, the building clearly lacks a boat dock or marina access.

Amenity lists cover parking, storage, pool, BBQ, and saunas but never a car wash area. Given the complete lack of mention and no MLS support, a car wash facility is very unlikely to exist.

Despite detailed amenity descriptions, there is no reference to any clubhouse or community center facility. With 0/20 MLS checkmarks and no textual support, the building appears not to have a clubhouse.

Across many listings, there is no reference to concierge or front-desk services; only management and security access are described. The near-total absence of the concierge checkbox in MLS and in remarks indicates the building does not offer concierge service.

Remarks consistently mention pet-friendliness but do not describe any on-site dog park or dog run. The absence in both remarks and MLS suggests there is no dedicated dog park in the building.

Amenity descriptions are detailed and include on-site management but do not reference any doorman or lobby attendant. The consistent absence of such terms strongly indicates there is no doorman service in this building.

Multiple listings list rooftop pool, BBQ, saunas, storage, guest parking, and manager but never mention a gym, fitness center, or exercise room. With only 1/20 MLS entries checking this amenity and no remark support, it is very likely the building does not offer an exercise room.

No listing advertises limousine or building car service, and MLS data shows no such amenity checked. This strongly indicates the building does not offer limo or house car service.

Listings highlight lobby, rooftop amenities, and storage but never describe any meeting or conference room. Given this and only 1 MLS record marking it, a meeting room is very unlikely.

Strong, repeated evidence confirms patio/deck amenities for this building. Multiple listings mention a 'rooftop amenity deck,' 'roof top deck,' 'terrace,' and private lanai spaces, indicating buyers can expect outdoor deck/patio-style features here. The language is consistent across many agents, so this looks like a real building amenity rather than a copy-paste checkbox error.

Proximity to nearby parks and beaches is mentioned, but not an on-site jogging or walking path. With no MLS indication, the building does not appear to have its own jogging path.

Across all public remarks there is no mention of any children's playground or play structure. With no MLS support either, the building appears not to offer a playground.

Listings emphasize private lanais and rooftop common areas rather than any yard or garden spaces. Given the high-rise structure and absence of any 'private yard' language across numerous remarks, it is very likely the building does not offer private yard areas for units.

Listings describe a rooftop pool deck, BBQ, and saunas, but never a putting green. The absence of any reference plus 0/20 MLS checkmarks indicates no putting green is present.

Multiple listings describe a shared rooftop amenity deck, terrace, or lounge space, including phrases like 'rooftop amenity deck,' 'rooftop pool deck,' and 'terrace.' While not every listing uses the exact words 'recreation area,' the building clearly offers a common recreation/amenity space available to residents.

Listings consistently describe common areas but never mention any recreation room or game/entertainment room. With only 1/20 MLS records marking this feature and no supporting remarks, a recreation room is very unlikely to exist.

At least one remark describes a craft brewery/gastropub located on the building’s ground floor, providing an on-site dining option. This qualifies as a restaurant amenity available within the building.

The building has a shared rooftop deck described with a pool, BBQ, saunas, showers, restrooms, and panoramic views. Multiple independent listings emphasize using the rooftop for swimming, grilling, and watching fireworks, confirming rooftop access and amenities.

Sauna is explicitly and repeatedly confirmed across the remarks, with many listings naming 'sauna' or 'men’s & women’s saunas' at the rooftop amenities. This is high-confidence, multi-source evidence that the building has a sauna amenity.

Storage is strongly supported across the remarks and appears to be a real building feature, not a one-off agent checkbox. At least 10+ listings explicitly mention storage in some form, including phrases like "storage unit," "storage locker," "extra storage space," and building storage for surfboards/bicycles. The consistency across multiple agents and listing types suggests this feature is genuinely available in the building.

There are multiple clear references to surfboard storage throughout the listings, including surfboard/bike storage and surfboard racks. This is strong, repeated evidence that surfboard storage is available.

Across all remarks there is no reference to any tennis court or tennis facilities. Combined with 0/20 MLS entries showing this amenity, this strongly indicates the building does not have a tennis court.

No reviewed remarks mention a trash, garbage, or refuse chute, despite many detailed amenity descriptions. Given the limited MLS support and absence from the public remarks, this feature should be treated as not confirmed for the building.

Parking is consistently described as assigned or tandem stalls in a secured garage, plus guest parking, with no suggestion of valet services. The lack of 'valet' mention across many amenity lists strongly indicates the building does not provide valet service.

The building is presented as an urban high-rise with secured access, not as a gated or walled compound. No remarks indicate any perimeter wall or fencing, so wall/fence-style physical perimeter security is very unlikely to be present.

Any Jacuzzi reference is clearly in-unit, not a building amenity, and there is no mention of a common-area hot tub or spa. With no MLS support, the building likely does not have a shared whirlpool.

The Pavilion at Waikiki has overwhelming evidence of a shared building pool. Roughly 20 listings mention it, with phrases like "rooftop swimming pool," "rooftop pool with ocean and sunset views," and "pool deck" appearing repeatedly across multiple agents. The consistency of these remarks, combined with the current MLS amenity data, makes this a very strong building feature.

None of the many remarks—some quite detailed about the 'newly renovated rooftop amenities'—describe the pool as heated, despite frequently highlighting it as a selling point. With only 1/20 MLS entries showing a heated-pool code and no corroborating text references, the evidence strongly indicates the rooftop pool is not heated and that the isolated 'heated pool' checkbox is likely incorrect. Buyers should expect a standard, unheated rooftop pool.

I searched for 'salt water pool,' 'saltwater pool,' 'salt pool,' and 'saline pool' wording, but the remarks only describe a rooftop pool. There is no public-remarks evidence that the pool is salt water.

In-unit laundry is strongly confirmed across the building. Roughly 20+ remarks explicitly mention it, using consistent language such as "in-unit washer/dryer," "washer and dryer in the unit," and "washer/dryer included," across multiple agents and time periods. This is not just copy-paste from MLS checkboxes; the feature is described in the remarks themselves and appears to be a stable building-wide offering for some units.

None of the roughly 20 listings reference a shared laundry room or 'community laundry' in their amenity lists, which instead consistently highlight rooftop pool, BBQ, sauna, guest parking, and storage. Given this omission plus 0/20 MLS mentions for community laundry and strong emphasis on in-unit washer/dryer, it is very likely the building does not offer notable shared laundry facilities.

I looked for coin-op, card-operated, quarters, or laundry-fee wording for shared laundry, but found nothing. The public remarks reference in-unit washer/dryers instead, so there is no evidence of paid community laundry.

I searched for language like 'laundry on each floor,' 'laundry room on every floor,' or similar floor-by-floor community laundry references, but found none. The remarks only mention in-unit washer/dryers, which does not support shared laundry on every floor.

Multiple listings mention included parking such as '1 assigned parking space', 'one parking condo', and '2 covered parking stalls (tandem)'. With 20/20 MLS entries showing parking-related codes and repeated references to a garage/lot, it is clear the building offers on-site parking for residents.

Assigned parking is strongly confirmed across the remarks, with many listings stating 'assigned parking stall,' '1 assigned parking space,' 'one assigned parking,' or 'deeded parking.' This appears to be consistent building-level parking availability rather than a one-off unit perk, and the repeated language across multiple listings suggests strong agent consensus rather than a copy-paste error.

Covered parking is repeatedly confirmed in the listing remarks, with phrases like 'covered garage,' 'covered parking stall,' 'secured and covered parking,' and 'assigned garaged covered parking stall.' The evidence is broad across multiple listings and agents, making this a strong building-level feature.

Public remarks explicitly describe deeded parking, including a listing that says the unit has "TWO deeded tandem parking stalls." I searched for deeded, owned, and included parking language and found clear support.

Across all provided remarks, there are no references to EV charging, Tesla chargers, or vehicle charging infrastructure. With every current MLS entry omitting the EVCHRG checkbox, the evidence strongly indicates the building lacks dedicated EV parking/charging facilities.

I searched for monthly parking fee, parking rental, additional parking charge, and similar language, but found no explicit fee information. The remarks mention assigned, secured, deeded, and guest parking, but not a monthly cost.

Guest parking is explicitly mentioned in many remarks, not just implied, with examples such as 'guest parking,' 'secured guest parking,' '10 guest parking stalls,' and 'several guest stalls.' This is consistent across multiple listings and strongly supports the feature at the building level.

There is strong and repeated evidence that parking/access is secured, with multiple listings describing 'secured entry,' 'secure entry,' 'key fob access,' and 'parking and the building's entry are both secured.' This is reinforced by remarks about 'secure covered garage' and 'secured guest parking,' indicating the building offers secured parking access rather than merely covered stalls.

Tandem parking is clearly present in the building based on multiple explicit remarks, including 'TWO deeded tandem parking stalls,' '2 covered parking stalls(tandem),' and '2 Parking Stalls (Tandem).' While not every unit has it, the repeated listings show that tandem spaces are available in the building.

Listings consistently describe self-parking in assigned/covered/guest stalls but never mention valet or attendant services. With all MLS entries omitting any valet checkbox, the evidence strongly supports that valet parking is not available at this building.

I looked for parking waitlist or waiting list language and found none. The only waitlist reference is for surfboard/bicycle storage, not parking, so there is no public evidence that parking operates on a waitlist.

Multiple remarks reference elevator access control, including a listing that explicitly notes 'keyed elevators' and another mentioning a 'secured elevator ride.' This directly supports that the building uses keyed or fob-secured elevators.

The remarks repeatedly describe electronic access control, including key fob access and secured entry. That is strong evidence the building has card/fob-based security access.

Across the listings, 0 remarks explicitly describe a security guard or on-site security staff. Multiple agents copied language about the building being “secured,” “secured entry,” “key fob access,” or “24 hour secured building,” but that does not establish guard service. The evidence remains consistently negative for this specific feature.

I searched for references to security patrol, roving security, patrol service, or a patrolled building, but found none. The remarks mention secured entry and a resident manager, not patrol service.

None of the many listings for this building note any video surveillance or security cameras. Agents consistently emphasize other security measures but never describe CCTV or video systems, suggesting such a system is not a notable or advertised building feature.

Central AC is strongly supported by the current remarks and prior MLS data. Well over a dozen listings explicitly mention "central AC" or "central air conditioning," including references to maintenance fees that include AC and a recently serviced/replaced AC unit. The evidence is consistent across multiple listings and agents, so this is high-confidence building-level feature data.

Across all provided remarks, there are zero references to split, ductless, or mini-split AC, while many listings emphasize central AC as the unit’s cooling. MLS data also shows 0/20 listings with split AC indicated, suggesting split systems are not present in this building’s units. The evidence strongly supports that buyers should not expect split AC here.

No listing remarks describe window or wall AC units, even though agents frequently highlight cooling and utilities and uniformly reference central AC. MLS checkbox data likewise shows 0/20 listings indicating window AC, so there is strong evidence that window units are not a feature in this building. Buyers should assume cooling is provided exclusively by central AC, not window units.

Evidence strongly supports concrete construction. Current MLS data has 18 of 20 listings marked CONCRE, and the remarks repeatedly describe the Pavilion at Waikiki as a high-rise/boutique condo tower, which aligns with concrete construction. There is broad consistency across many listings, suggesting this is not just copy-paste checkbox noise.

There is no substantive remark evidence for double-wall construction in the listings provided. Instead, the building is repeatedly framed as a concrete high-rise, while only 3 of 20 MLS records check DOUWAL. This looks much more like inconsistent MLS entry than a real building feature.

Hollow tile is not mentioned in any remarks and appears in just 2/20 MLS records, which is consistent with sporadic checkbox misuse rather than a building-wide construction type. We therefore do not record hollow tile as a defining construction material for this tower.

Masonry/stucco is rarely checked in MLS and never mentioned in remarks for this building, whereas concrete is consistently selected. The few MASSTU entries are best treated as isolated checkbox noise, so we do not classify the building as masonry/stucco construction.

Very little support for steel-frame construction: only 1 of 20 recent MLS records lists 'STEFRA' and none of the public remarks across many listings mention steel framing or a structural change. Agents uniformly describe amenities and interiors; the preponderance of 'CONCRE' entries and lack of any explicit remarks about steel framing indicate the building should not be classified as steel-frame.

The vast majority of listings do not classify the building with the SLAB construction code, and there are no remarks referencing a slab foundation. To avoid relying on a single outlier checkbox with no narrative support, we do not record slab construction as a documented feature.

No analysis available

No listings or remarks describe any wood-frame construction, and all available MLS data omit the wood-frame checkbox. Given the building’s high-rise form and concrete classification, wood-frame construction is effectively ruled out.

Several listings explicitly tag the building as Above Ground, and the remarks consistently describe a multi-story high-rise with units on the 19th, 24th, 26th, and 28th floors plus rooftop amenities. This is strong building-level evidence that the property is above-ground construction, not a ground-level or subterranean structure. The pattern appears consistent across multiple agents and listings.

There are no textual references to brick construction and nearly all MLS records omit BRICK despite many different agents and listings. We therefore treat the lone BRICK checkbox as a mis-click and do not classify the building as brick-constructed.

No agents mark or describe any single-wall construction, and this method is inconsistent with a 20+ story concrete condo tower. We can confidently exclude single-wall construction for this building.

The public remarks clearly indicate short-term rentals are allowed only at 30-day minimums, which means STR is permitted in a limited form. I searched for STR allowed, vacation rental, NUC/TVU, and minimum-stay language and found repeated 30-day rental references.

I searched for hotel pool, hotel rental program, and hotel-managed rental language, but found nothing. Since the building’s rental rule is a standard 30-day minimum and no hotel-pool language appears, this is best read as false.

I looked for mandatory participation language such as required pool enrollment or cannot opt out wording and found none. The remarks describe flexible ownership and rental use, which is inconsistent with a mandatory hotel pool.

At least two separate listings describe their units as 'fee simple,' confirming that fee simple ownership exists in this building. No remarks mention leasehold or lease rent, suggesting fee simple is the predominant tenure type here.

No listing remarks indicate leasehold status, lease rent, or lease expiry, which are typically highlighted when present in Waikiki buildings. Combined with explicit 'fee simple' descriptions and no LH entries in MLS data, this strongly suggests the building does not offer leasehold units.

The building/unit is described in public remarks as leasehold with an expiration year of 2039. I looked for lease expiry, ground lease end, and renewal language; the clearest explicit year mentioned is 2039.

The remarks repeatedly identify the building as VA approved or VA acceptable, which is strong public evidence for VA financing eligibility. I searched for VA approval, VA financing, and VA loan language and found explicit mentions in several listings.

The listings repeatedly and explicitly describe the building as fully insured, including a direct statement of "100% fully insured." This strongly supports comprehensive walls-in/HOA insurance coverage.

Dozens of remarks detail building systems and amenities (pool, saunas, rooftop deck, insurance status) but never mention fire sprinklers, and a single FIRSPR checkbox is likely an agent error. Given the age of the building and lack of any textual confirmation, it is highly likely there is no building-wide fire sprinkler system.

I searched the remarks for FLSE, fire/life safety evaluation, fire inspection approval, and related compliance phrasing, but found nothing. Because there is no explicit confirmation in the public remarks, this remains unverified and is treated as false with low confidence.

Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.

No analysis available

Building-level ocean views are present: 7 of 20 current listings include OCEAN in view_descriptions and many agent remarks explicitly mention 'ocean views', 'ocean and sunset views', 'over to the Pacific' and 'peek-a-boo ocean view'. Evidence is consistent across multiple listings/agents and matches prior high-confidence historical data, so the building should be listed as offering ocean views.

Mountain views are well supported across the building, with multiple listings explicitly describing "Koolau Mountains," "mauka Tradewinds," "breathtaking mountain views," and "city-to-mountain views." Current MLS data also shows 8/20 listings with mountain in the view description, which matches the remarks and suggests this is a real building-level offering rather than a copy-paste error.

Select higher-floor and penthouse units, as well as the rooftop deck, enjoy Diamond Head vistas. Phrases like 'amazing Diamond Head...view' and 'peek-a-boo view of Diamond Head from the open lanai' confirm this across multiple remarks. Diamond Head views are available from certain exposures in the building.

City views are extremely well supported for this building, with 16/20 current MLS listings showing CITY in the view description and numerous remarks explicitly saying "city views," "city and mountain views," and "ocean, city, and sunset views." The consistency across many listings and agents indicates this is a genuine feature of some units in the building, not just MLS checkbox noise.

High-floor and ocean-side units look across the park toward the shoreline, offering more than just a straight-on water view. The COASTL flag in MLS and repeated references to expansive views over Fort DeRussy to the ocean imply visible stretches of coastline. Coastline vistas appear available from select exposures and floors.

Units facing Fort DeRussy enjoy lush, landscaped park vistas that agents sometimes classify as garden views. The MLS GARDEN view flag on one listing supports this interpretation. Buyers can expect green, landscaped outlooks in addition to ocean/park views from some units.

Some units and lanais look toward the Ala Wai Golf Course across the canal, providing fairway/greens vistas. Phrases like 'amazing...golf course views from your lanai and bedroom' and 'views of the canal, golf course, city and mountain' provide direct evidence. This confirms that golf course views are available from certain stacks and floors.

Several units face the Ala Wai Canal, offering direct water and canal vistas, and the rooftop deck emphasizes panoramic canal views. Remarks such as 'view of the Ala Wai Canal' and '360 panoramic views of the Ala Wai Canal and mountains' demonstrate consistent canal/marina-type outlooks. Buyers seeking water-adjacent views (canal/harbor style) can find them here.

Sunrise/eastern exposure is documented though less common: CURRENT MLS data flags SUNRIS in 1 of 20 listings and public remarks include an explicit 'sunrise views' mention (Unit 2406) plus references to morning/eastern aspects in some listings. Evidence is present and consistent with prior high-confidence assessment, so include view_sunrise = true.

Ocean-facing units and the rooftop amenity deck showcase evening sun and colorful sunset skies over the Pacific. Several agents emphasize 'golden sunsets' and ocean-and-sunset views as a key selling point. Sunset and Friday-night-fireworks viewing from the building is repeatedly highlighted.

Across many independent listings, views are consistently described as ocean, park, city, canal, mountain, Diamond Head, golf course, sunrise, and sunset, with no reference to any cemetery. Given both MLS and narrative descriptions, it is highly likely this building does not have cemetery views. This is treated as an intentional exclusion rather than a correction of past data.

Multiple listings explicitly say fireworks can be watched from the rooftop and private lanais, which is direct evidence of fireworks views from the building/units. This is consistent and repeated across the remarks.

No analysis available

No analysis available

The building is repeatedly advertised as 'pet-friendly' and 'Pet Friendly! Up to 30 lbs' by multiple agents in different listings. This consistent language, without any contrary 'no pets' restrictions, confirms that pets are allowed in the building.

Strong evidence the building has an on-site/resident manager. Current public remarks explicitly mention this in at least 3 listings, including "Amenities include building manager," "property manager on-site," and "manager on site who ensures that everything runs smoothly." The consistency across multiple remarks supports that this is a real building feature rather than a copy-paste MLS checkbox error.

The building operates with a minimum 30-day rental period, which is typical of residential condos, not hotel-style nightly rentals. The absence of any hotel program or condotel language across extensive remarks indicates it is not a condotel.

Ownership is repeatedly characterized as 'fee simple' condominium rather than share-based cooperative ownership. The lack of any 'co-op' or 'cooperative' language across many listings confirms this is not a co-op building.