Pavilion at Waikiki

All available MLS records consistently list 1975 as the construction year for this building. No listing remarks indicate a different build year or full reconstruction that would override this.

Multiple listings reference a '28th floor rooftop pool' and a 'Penthouse unit on the 28th floor,' confirming the building tops out at the 28th floor. No remarks suggest any higher occupied floors, and all high-floor references are at or below 28.

Remarks for different listings repeatedly state that the Pavilion at Waikiki has '155 units in the building.' The repetition of '155 units, 10 guest parking stalls' across multiple listings strongly supports 155 as the total unit count.

The current value (43.00%) is retained per rules because no explicit owner-occupancy percentage was provided in the public remarks. I searched for phrases such as '80% owner occupied', 'majority owner occupied', and numeric percentages but found none, so the existing numeric value is kept with low confidence.

Remarks explicitly reference the number of elevators (e.g., "2 elevator's") and mention keyed elevators, supporting the numeric value of 2. I searched the remarks for numeric and word forms (e.g., '2 elevators', 'two elevators', 'multiple elevators') and found explicit mentions confirming 2 elevators.

Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.

Central air conditioning is repeatedly listed in agent remarks ('central AC', 'Central A/C', 'air conditioning included') and historical MLS checkboxes are high (17/20), indicating strong building-level coverage of central AC in HOA fees.

Multiple agent remarks explicitly state 'Cable TV' or 'basic cable' is included in maintenance fees across the building (many listings). Combined with historical MLS checkbox prevalence (16/20), the evidence is strong and consistent across different agents rather than isolated copy/paste.

Several public remarks state 'Common Area Expenses' or 'common expenses' are included in the maintenance fee, and MLS association fields have previously listed OTCOEX for a subset of units; evidence across listings indicates common-area electricity/expenses are covered.

All available information characterizes the building as fee simple condominiums rather than a cooperative. With no MLS flags for COOTAX and no remarks about co-op taxes, there is strong evidence that cooperative taxes are not part of the maintenance fees.

Numerous listings state 'electricity' or 'electric' is included in the maintenance fee and historical MLS checkbox prevalence (18/20) is very high, providing robust, consistent evidence that electricity is covered by the HOA fees.

Across numerous listings that carefully spell out which utilities are included, gas is never mentioned even when agents say 'all utilities' and then list them. Given the very low MLS checkbox rate (2/20) and this consistent omission, gas inclusion appears to be an error rather than a real building feature.

Many agent remarks directly state 'hot water' or 'hot water included' in maintenance fees and historical MLS checkboxes are high (16/20 HOTWAT). Although one listing lists WTRHTR, the preponderance of evidence across listings indicates hot water is included.

Multiple agent remarks explicitly list 'internet included', 'high-speed internet', or 'basic cable/internet service' included in HOA fees, and MLS association flags historically show internet service commonly checked (about 15/20), so building-level internet inclusion is well supported.

The building is described as a Waikiki high-rise near parks, beaches, and shopping, with no reference to marina facilities or boat access. With zero MLS marina flags and no textual evidence, marina fees are not part of the maintenance charges.

Agent remarks repeatedly state that 'sewer' or 'sewer included' is part of the maintenance fees, and MLS checkbox data is consistently high (17/20), providing strong, corroborated evidence sewer is included in the HOA fees.

Numerous public remarks explicitly state 'water' or 'water included' and historical MLS association flags show water inclusion is common (about 16/20), so there is strong, consistent evidence water is covered by the maintenance fees.

Very strong evidence: 19 of 20 current MLS listings include BBQ in amenities and the aggregated public remarks repeatedly state "BBQ area", "barbecue areas", and "BBQ grill" in multiple agent descriptions of the rooftop amenity deck. Mentions appear across many different listings/agents (not isolated), suggesting a genuine shared building BBQ facility rather than isolated unit features.

At least five listings explicitly reference bike-related storage, including 'bike/surf rack available', 'storage for surfboards and bicycles (waitlisted)', 'bicycle storage', and 'bike storage areas'. The consistent mention of dedicated bike/surf storage across multiple units and agents indicates that secure bicycle storage is a real, established building amenity despite being unchecked in the MLS fields.

Remarks focus on views of the Ala Wai Canal and proximity to beaches, not on any docking or marina facilities. With no textual or MLS evidence, the building clearly lacks a boat dock or marina access.

Amenity lists cover parking, storage, pool, BBQ, and saunas but never a car wash area. Given the complete lack of mention and no MLS support, a car wash facility is very unlikely to exist.

Despite detailed amenity descriptions, there is no reference to any clubhouse or community center facility. With 0/20 MLS checkmarks and no textual support, the building appears not to have a clubhouse.

Across many listings, there is no reference to concierge or front-desk services; only management and security access are described. The near-total absence of the concierge checkbox in MLS and in remarks indicates the building does not offer concierge service.

Remarks consistently mention pet-friendliness but do not describe any on-site dog park or dog run. The absence in both remarks and MLS suggests there is no dedicated dog park in the building.

Amenity descriptions are detailed and include on-site management but do not reference any doorman or lobby attendant. The consistent absence of such terms strongly indicates there is no doorman service in this building.

Multiple listings list rooftop pool, BBQ, saunas, storage, guest parking, and manager but never mention a gym, fitness center, or exercise room. With only 1/20 MLS entries checking this amenity and no remark support, it is very likely the building does not offer an exercise room.

No listing advertises limousine or building car service, and MLS data shows no such amenity checked. This strongly indicates the building does not offer limo or house car service.

Listings highlight lobby, rooftop amenities, and storage but never describe any meeting or conference room. Given this and only 1 MLS record marking it, a meeting room is very unlikely.

Strong, corroborating evidence across multiple agent remarks: numerous listings explicitly state rooftop amenities such as "rooftop amenity deck," "rooftop pool deck," "rooftop pool, BBQ, sauna and terrace," and repeated mentions of private "lanai." Historical MLS checkbox data also indicated 11/20 listings with patio/deck checked, and the remarks show this is a building-wide shared rooftop deck/pool and individual unit lanais, confirming the feature.

Proximity to nearby parks and beaches is mentioned, but not an on-site jogging or walking path. With no MLS indication, the building does not appear to have its own jogging path.

Across all public remarks there is no mention of any children's playground or play structure. With no MLS support either, the building appears not to offer a playground.

Listings emphasize private lanais and rooftop common areas rather than any yard or garden spaces. Given the high-rise structure and absence of any 'private yard' language across numerous remarks, it is very likely the building does not offer private yard areas for units.

Listings describe a rooftop pool deck, BBQ, and saunas, but never a putting green. The absence of any reference plus 0/20 MLS checkmarks indicates no putting green is present.

Strong evidence: 8 of 20 MLS listings currently list a recreation/rec area and the public remarks frequently describe a shared rooftop amenity deck with pool, lounge/terrace, and picnic/BBQ spaces (quotes include "rooftop amenity deck" and "rooftop pool deck"). These references appear across multiple agent entries and align with prior high-confidence records of a communal recreation area.

Listings consistently describe common areas but never mention any recreation room or game/entertainment room. With only 1/20 MLS records marking this feature and no supporting remarks, a recreation room is very unlikely to exist.

At least one remark describes a craft brewery/gastropub located on the building’s ground floor, providing an on-site dining option. This qualifies as a restaurant amenity available within the building.

The building has a shared rooftop deck described with a pool, BBQ, saunas, showers, restrooms, and panoramic views. Multiple independent listings emphasize using the rooftop for swimming, grilling, and watching fireworks, confirming rooftop access and amenities.

Very strong evidence: 16 of 20 MLS listings list sauna and the aggregated remarks include repeated explicit phrases such as "sauna", "men’s & women’s saunas", and "men's and women's saunas" tied to the rooftop amenities. Multiple different listings reference saunas, showing consistent confirmation across agents rather than a single erroneous entry.

Roughly ten listings explicitly mention storage, using phrases like 'storage locker', 'extra storage space', 'personal storage unit at the front of the parking space', and '3 separate storage spaces assigned to this unit'. The repetition of dedicated lockers and storage rooms tied to stalls and floors across multiple independent listings strongly supports building-provided storage units as a standard amenity.

Several public remarks explicitly confirm that the building provides surfboard storage or bike/surfboard racks, giving strong evidence that surfboard storage exists.

Across all remarks there is no reference to any tennis court or tennis facilities. Combined with 0/20 MLS entries showing this amenity, this strongly indicates the building does not have a tennis court.

Although not highlighted in the public remarks, 6 out of 20 MLS listings mark a trash chute amenity for this 28-story high-rise. Given the building type and recurring MLS indication, it is reasonably likely that a trash chute system is present.

Parking is consistently described as assigned or tandem stalls in a secured garage, plus guest parking, with no suggestion of valet services. The lack of 'valet' mention across many amenity lists strongly indicates the building does not provide valet service.

The building is presented as an urban high-rise with secured access, not as a gated or walled compound. No remarks indicate any perimeter wall or fencing, so wall/fence-style physical perimeter security is very unlikely to be present.

Any Jacuzzi reference is clearly in-unit, not a building amenity, and there is no mention of a common-area hot tub or spa. With no MLS support, the building likely does not have a shared whirlpool.

Strong, consistent evidence that the Pavilion at Waikiki has a building pool: the majority of listings (historically 18/20) explicitly reference a rooftop or rooftop pool deck (quotes include "rooftop pool," "sparkling pool," and "rooftop amenity deck featuring a sparkling pool"). Multiple different listing remarks and agents describe the same common-area pool amenity, indicating the pool is a verified building feature rather than a copy-paste error.

None of the many remarks—some quite detailed about the 'newly renovated rooftop amenities'—describe the pool as heated, despite frequently highlighting it as a selling point. With only 1/20 MLS entries showing a heated-pool code and no corroborating text references, the evidence strongly indicates the rooftop pool is not heated and that the isolated 'heated pool' checkbox is likely incorrect. Buyers should expect a standard, unheated rooftop pool.

I searched for terms indicating a salt water pool (salt water, saltwater, saline) and found none; listings describe a rooftop pool but do not specify salt water.

High-confidence evidence that units in this building offer in‑unit laundry: 19 of 20 recent MLS listings indicate washer/dryer included. Remarks repeatedly use phrases like "in-unit washer/dryer", "Washer & Dryer is in the unit", and "full-size washer and dryer," appearing across multiple agent listings rather than isolated to a single copy/paste entry.

None of the roughly 20 listings reference a shared laundry room or 'community laundry' in their amenity lists, which instead consistently highlight rooftop pool, BBQ, sauna, guest parking, and storage. Given this omission plus 0/20 MLS mentions for community laundry and strong emphasis on in-unit washer/dryer, it is very likely the building does not offer notable shared laundry facilities.

I looked for terms indicating paid community laundry (coin-op, card-operated, quarters) and found none. Remarks emphasize in-unit laundry; no paid communal laundry language appears.

I searched the public remarks for phrases like 'laundry on each floor', 'laundry room on every floor', and 'floor-by-floor laundry' and found no references. Multiple listings emphasize in-unit washer/dryer rather than community laundry.

Multiple listings mention included parking such as '1 assigned parking space', 'one parking condo', and '2 covered parking stalls (tandem)'. With 20/20 MLS entries showing parking-related codes and repeated references to a garage/lot, it is clear the building offers on-site parking for residents.

Strong evidence that the building offers assigned parking: historical MLS checkbox data indicated 15 of 20 listings with assigned parking, and multiple current remarks explicitly state "assigned parking stall", "deeded tandem parking stalls", "1 assigned parking space", or similar across listings. Mentions appear across different listings/agents (not isolated), supporting a high-confidence conclusion that assigned parking is offered.

Multiple listings (at least 15) explicitly reference covered or garage parking (quotes include 'covered garage', 'covered parking stall', '1 covered, secured parking stall', '2 covered secured parking'), consistent across agents and matching historical MLS checkbox data, indicating strong building-level covered parking availability.

Public remarks consistently indicate parking is deeded or assigned for many units, including explicit 'deeded' wording for some listings. I searched for 'deeded', 'assigned', and 'tandem' in the remarks.

Across all provided remarks, there are no references to EV charging, Tesla chargers, or vehicle charging infrastructure. With every current MLS entry omitting the EVCHRG checkbox, the evidence strongly indicates the building lacks dedicated EV parking/charging facilities.

I searched for phrases like 'monthly parking fee', '$ per month', 'parking rental', and 'parking charge' but found no specific monthly parking fee or amount mentioned. Therefore the monthly parking fee is unknown from these remarks.

Multiple listings and remarks confirm building guest parking is available: several listings state "guest parking" or "guest stalls," with at least one remark specifying "10 guest parking stalls." Evidence is present across many agent listings and aligns with the MLS guest-parking checkbox entries.

Evidence that parking/garage entry is secured appears in many listings (around 9–12 remarks) with phrases like 'secure covered garage', 'secured entry', 'parking and the building's entry are both secured by key fob/call box', and 'secured guest parking'. Mentions come from multiple agent listings and align with historical MLS data, supporting that parking has controlled/secured access.

Several units are advertised with tandem parking arrangements, including 'TWO deeded tandem parking stalls' and '2 covered parking stalls(tandem)'. These repeated mentions confirm that the building offers tandem-style parking stalls for some units.

Listings consistently describe self-parking in assigned/covered/guest stalls but never mention valet or attendant services. With all MLS entries omitting any valet checkbox, the evidence strongly supports that valet parking is not available at this building.

I searched for 'parking waitlist', 'waiting list for parking', and similar phrases and found no explicit parking waitlist reference. Storage waitlists are present but do not indicate a parking waitlist.

Multiple remarks reference elevator access control, including a listing that explicitly notes 'keyed elevators' and another mentioning a 'secured elevator ride.' This directly supports that the building uses keyed or fob-secured elevators.

Multiple listings explicitly describe electronic/key fob/card-type secure entry and keyed elevators, indicating the building has electronic access control.

No public remarks explicitly state a security guard or on-site security personnel across the listings (0/29 remarks used phrases like 'security guard' or 'on-site security'). Although 5 of 20 MLS amenity checkboxes show SECGUA, multiple agent remarks mention 'secured entry', 'secured building', or 'manager on site' rather than a staffed security presence, suggesting the SECGUA checkbox was likely applied inconsistently and not indicative of actual guard service.

I searched for language indicating a security patrol or roving patrol and found none. The building is described as secured with keyed entry and a resident manager, but no patrol service is referenced.

None of the many listings for this building note any video surveillance or security cameras. Agents consistently emphasize other security measures but never describe CCTV or video systems, suggesting such a system is not a notable or advertised building feature.

Very strong, consistent evidence the building has central air: historical MLS checkbox data listed ACCEN on all 20 listings' inclusions and 15/20 unit feature checks. Numerous current public remarks across the listings explicitly state phrases like 'central AC' and 'maintenance fee includes central AC,' indicating multiple agents consistently report a building-wide central air system rather than isolated units.

Across all provided remarks, there are zero references to split, ductless, or mini-split AC, while many listings emphasize central AC as the unit’s cooling. MLS data also shows 0/20 listings with split AC indicated, suggesting split systems are not present in this building’s units. The evidence strongly supports that buyers should not expect split AC here.

No listing remarks describe window or wall AC units, even though agents frequently highlight cooling and utilities and uniformly reference central AC. MLS checkbox data likewise shows 0/20 listings indicating window AC, so there is strong evidence that window units are not a feature in this building. Buyers should assume cooling is provided exclusively by central AC, not window units.

Strong evidence the Pavilion at Waikiki is concrete construction: 18 of 20 recent MLS records list 'CONCRE' as the construction material. None of the aggregated public remarks mention a change in structural material or newly installed structural elements; agent descriptions consistently focus on amenities and interiors rather than structural changes, suggesting the concrete designation is accurate and consistent across multiple agents.

The building is consistently characterized as a concrete high-rise rather than double-wall construction, and only a small minority of listings check the DOUWAL box. With no supporting remarks, we treat double-wall as not a documented building construction type here.

Hollow tile is not mentioned in any remarks and appears in just 2/20 MLS records, which is consistent with sporadic checkbox misuse rather than a building-wide construction type. We therefore do not record hollow tile as a defining construction material for this tower.

Masonry/stucco is rarely checked in MLS and never mentioned in remarks for this building, whereas concrete is consistently selected. The few MASSTU entries are best treated as isolated checkbox noise, so we do not classify the building as masonry/stucco construction.

Very little support for steel-frame construction: only 1 of 20 recent MLS records lists 'STEFRA' and none of the public remarks across many listings mention steel framing or a structural change. Agents uniformly describe amenities and interiors; the preponderance of 'CONCRE' entries and lack of any explicit remarks about steel framing indicate the building should not be classified as steel-frame.

The vast majority of listings do not classify the building with the SLAB construction code, and there are no remarks referencing a slab foundation. To avoid relying on a single outlier checkbox with no narrative support, we do not record slab construction as a documented feature.

No analysis available

No listings or remarks describe any wood-frame construction, and all available MLS data omit the wood-frame checkbox. Given the building’s high-rise form and concrete classification, wood-frame construction is effectively ruled out.

Several listings explicitly tag the building as Above Ground, and by its nature the Pavilion at Waikiki is a multi-level high-rise with residential floors elevated well above ground level. Despite inconsistent MLS usage, the physical configuration supports treating above-ground construction as present.

There are no textual references to brick construction and nearly all MLS records omit BRICK despite many different agents and listings. We therefore treat the lone BRICK checkbox as a mis-click and do not classify the building as brick-constructed.

No agents mark or describe any single-wall construction, and this method is inconsistent with a 20+ story concrete condo tower. We can confidently exclude single-wall construction for this building.

Public remarks consistently indicate a 30-day minimum rental period, which means short-term rentals (less than 30 days) are not allowed. I searched for 'short-term', 'STR', 'vacation rental', '30-day minimum', and similar phrases.

There is no mention of a hotel rental pool or hotel-managed program in any remarks. Because short-term rentals are prohibited by the 30-day minimum, hotel rental pool participation would be inapplicable.

No public remarks indicate mandatory participation in any rental pool program. With STR disallowed by the 30-day minimum, mandatory hotel-pool participation is not applicable.

At least two separate listings describe their units as 'fee simple,' confirming that fee simple ownership exists in this building. No remarks mention leasehold or lease rent, suggesting fee simple is the predominant tenure type here.

No listing remarks indicate leasehold status, lease rent, or lease expiry, which are typically highlighted when present in Waikiki buildings. Combined with explicit 'fee simple' descriptions and no LH entries in MLS data, this strongly suggests the building does not offer leasehold units.

At least one listing explicitly identifies a leasehold unit with the lease ending in 2039. If multiple lease years had appeared I would select the most recent/extended date, but only 2039 is stated.

Public remarks repeatedly identify the Pavilion at Waikiki as VA approved/acceptable for VA financing. I searched the remarks for phrases like 'VA approved', 'VA acceptable', and 'VA financing'.

Several listings explicitly describe the building as "100% fully insured," indicating comprehensive (walls-in) HOA insurance coverage. Because the phrase appears directly in the remarks, this boolean is set to true with high confidence.

Dozens of remarks detail building systems and amenities (pool, saunas, rooftop deck, insurance status) but never mention fire sprinklers, and a single FIRSPR checkbox is likely an agent error. Given the age of the building and lack of any textual confirmation, it is highly likely there is no building-wide fire sprinkler system.

There is no evidence in the public remarks that the building has passed a fire/life safety evaluation (FLSE). I searched the remarks for phrases like 'fire life safety evaluation passed', 'FLSE passed', 'fire safety certified', and 'passed fire inspection' and found no matches, so the feature is set to false with medium confidence.

Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.

No analysis available

Building-level ocean views are present: 7 of 20 current listings include OCEAN in view_descriptions and many agent remarks explicitly mention 'ocean views', 'ocean and sunset views', 'over to the Pacific' and 'peek-a-boo ocean view'. Evidence is consistent across multiple listings/agents and matches prior high-confidence historical data, so the building should be listed as offering ocean views.

Building-level mountain/mauka views are supported: CURRENT MLS data flags MOUNTA in 2 of 20 listings and numerous agent remarks explicitly state 'mountain views', 'mauka', or 'tradewinds from your lanai' on the cool/mountain side. Evidence is consistent across several agent remarks and aligns with prior high-confidence assessments, so include view_mountain = true.

Select higher-floor and penthouse units, as well as the rooftop deck, enjoy Diamond Head vistas. Phrases like 'amazing Diamond Head...view' and 'peek-a-boo view of Diamond Head from the open lanai' confirm this across multiple remarks. Diamond Head views are available from certain exposures in the building.

Building-level city views are offered: 15 of 20 current listings include CITY in view_descriptions and many public remarks state 'city views', 'city-to-mountain views', 'city and park views' and 'panoramic views'. Multiple agents consistently reference city views, supporting a high-confidence conclusion that the building offers city-view units.

High-floor and ocean-side units look across the park toward the shoreline, offering more than just a straight-on water view. The COASTL flag in MLS and repeated references to expansive views over Fort DeRussy to the ocean imply visible stretches of coastline. Coastline vistas appear available from select exposures and floors.

Units facing Fort DeRussy enjoy lush, landscaped park vistas that agents sometimes classify as garden views. The MLS GARDEN view flag on one listing supports this interpretation. Buyers can expect green, landscaped outlooks in addition to ocean/park views from some units.

Some units and lanais look toward the Ala Wai Golf Course across the canal, providing fairway/greens vistas. Phrases like 'amazing...golf course views from your lanai and bedroom' and 'views of the canal, golf course, city and mountain' provide direct evidence. This confirms that golf course views are available from certain stacks and floors.

Several units face the Ala Wai Canal, offering direct water and canal vistas, and the rooftop deck emphasizes panoramic canal views. Remarks such as 'view of the Ala Wai Canal' and '360 panoramic views of the Ala Wai Canal and mountains' demonstrate consistent canal/marina-type outlooks. Buyers seeking water-adjacent views (canal/harbor style) can find them here.

Sunrise/eastern exposure is documented though less common: CURRENT MLS data flags SUNRIS in 1 of 20 listings and public remarks include an explicit 'sunrise views' mention (Unit 2406) plus references to morning/eastern aspects in some listings. Evidence is present and consistent with prior high-confidence assessment, so include view_sunrise = true.

Ocean-facing units and the rooftop amenity deck showcase evening sun and colorful sunset skies over the Pacific. Several agents emphasize 'golden sunsets' and ocean-and-sunset views as a key selling point. Sunset and Friday-night-fireworks viewing from the building is repeatedly highlighted.

Across many independent listings, views are consistently described as ocean, park, city, canal, mountain, Diamond Head, golf course, sunrise, and sunset, with no reference to any cemetery. Given both MLS and narrative descriptions, it is highly likely this building does not have cemetery views. This is treated as an intentional exclusion rather than a correction of past data.

Several remarks explicitly confirm residents can watch Friday night/Hilton fireworks from private lanais and the rooftop amenity deck, providing direct evidence of fireworks views from the building.

No analysis available

No analysis available

The building is repeatedly advertised as 'pet-friendly' and 'Pet Friendly! Up to 30 lbs' by multiple agents in different listings. This consistent language, without any contrary 'no pets' restrictions, confirms that pets are allowed in the building.

Strong evidence the building has an on-site/resident manager: historical MLS checkbox data showed RESMAN in 16/20 past listings and 15/20 current listings, and the public remarks explicitly state phrases like "resident manager", "manager on site", and "property manager on-site" in multiple listings (at least several different agent remarks). Mentions appear across listings rather than a single copy/paste instance, supporting a high-confidence inclusion of this feature.

The building operates with a minimum 30-day rental period, which is typical of residential condos, not hotel-style nightly rentals. The absence of any hotel program or condotel language across extensive remarks indicates it is not a condotel.

Ownership is repeatedly characterized as 'fee simple' condominium rather than share-based cooperative ownership. The lack of any 'co-op' or 'cooperative' language across many listings confirms this is not a co-op building.