Pavilion at Waikiki

All available MLS records consistently list 1975 as the construction year for this building. No listing remarks indicate a different build year or full reconstruction that would override this.

Multiple listings reference a '28th floor rooftop pool' and a 'Penthouse unit on the 28th floor,' confirming the building tops out at the 28th floor. No remarks suggest any higher occupied floors, and all high-floor references are at or below 28.

Remarks for different listings repeatedly state that the Pavilion at Waikiki has '155 units in the building.' The repetition of '155 units, 10 guest parking stalls' across multiple listings strongly supports 155 as the total unit count.

Searched for phrases like 'owner occupied', 'owner-occupancy', and specific percentages (e.g., '80% owner occupied') but found no explicit numeric statements. Because a current value of 43.00 exists in the building context and remarks do not confirm or contradict it, the value is retained with low confidence.

Multiple public remarks explicitly mention elevators including the phrase "2 elevator's" and references to keyed elevators, directly supporting the building having two elevators. This matches the building context of 2 elevators.

Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.

Central air conditioning is repeatedly mentioned as both a unit feature and an included utility in the maintenance fee. Combined with 17/20 MLS records checking ACCEN, this strongly supports that central AC costs are covered by the association.

Multiple independent listings state that cable or cable TV service is included in the maintenance fee. With 16/20 MLS entries checking CABTV and numerous remarks listing cable among included utilities, this is a well-established building feature rather than agent copy-paste.

Several listings describe 'Common Area Expenses' or 'common expenses' as part of what the maintenance fees cover. Together with OTCOEX being checked in a significant share of MLS entries, this indicates common area electricity/expenses are included at the building level.

All available information characterizes the building as fee simple condominiums rather than a cooperative. With no MLS flags for COOTAX and no remarks about co-op taxes, there is strong evidence that cooperative taxes are not part of the maintenance fees.

Electricity is one of the most consistently mentioned inclusions in the maintenance fee across many independent listings. With 18/20 MLS entries and repeated explicit phrases listing electricity among included utilities, this is clearly a building-wide feature.

Across numerous listings that carefully spell out which utilities are included, gas is never mentioned even when agents say 'all utilities' and then list them. Given the very low MLS checkbox rate (2/20) and this consistent omission, gas inclusion appears to be an error rather than a real building feature.

Hot water is repeatedly named in detailed maintenance-inclusion lists across many agents, often as part of 'all utilities' covered. Despite one MLS entry mentioning a water heater, the dominant pattern (16/20 HOTWAT plus explicit remarks) supports that building-supplied hot water is included in the fees.

Internet service is explicitly mentioned as included in the maintenance fee in multiple recent listings, and most MLS entries check INTSER. While one remark excludes internet, the weight of newer descriptions and MLS data indicates that internet is now generally covered by the HOA fees.

The building is described as a Waikiki high-rise near parks, beaches, and shopping, with no reference to marina facilities or boat access. With zero MLS marina flags and no textual evidence, marina fees are not part of the maintenance charges.

Sewer charges are frequently and explicitly listed among the utilities covered by the maintenance fee. The very high MLS inclusion rate plus numerous independent remarks confirm sewer is a standard included utility for this building.

Water service is consistently cited as part of the maintenance fee in numerous public remarks and appears as a checked inclusion in most MLS records. This strong, repeated evidence across agents shows that water charges are covered by the HOA fees.

Rooftop BBQ facilities are repeatedly described in the remarks, including 'BBQ area on the rooftop' and 'BBQ and picnic area.' With both extensive remark support and 19/20 MLS entries showing BBQ, this amenity is clearly present.

At least five listings explicitly reference bike-related storage, including 'bike/surf rack available', 'storage for surfboards and bicycles (waitlisted)', 'bicycle storage', and 'bike storage areas'. The consistent mention of dedicated bike/surf storage across multiple units and agents indicates that secure bicycle storage is a real, established building amenity despite being unchecked in the MLS fields.

Remarks focus on views of the Ala Wai Canal and proximity to beaches, not on any docking or marina facilities. With no textual or MLS evidence, the building clearly lacks a boat dock or marina access.

Amenity lists cover parking, storage, pool, BBQ, and saunas but never a car wash area. Given the complete lack of mention and no MLS support, a car wash facility is very unlikely to exist.

Despite detailed amenity descriptions, there is no reference to any clubhouse or community center facility. With 0/20 MLS checkmarks and no textual support, the building appears not to have a clubhouse.

Across many listings, there is no reference to concierge or front-desk services; only management and security access are described. The near-total absence of the concierge checkbox in MLS and in remarks indicates the building does not offer concierge service.

Remarks consistently mention pet-friendliness but do not describe any on-site dog park or dog run. The absence in both remarks and MLS suggests there is no dedicated dog park in the building.

Amenity descriptions are detailed and include on-site management but do not reference any doorman or lobby attendant. The consistent absence of such terms strongly indicates there is no doorman service in this building.

Multiple listings list rooftop pool, BBQ, saunas, storage, guest parking, and manager but never mention a gym, fitness center, or exercise room. With only 1/20 MLS entries checking this amenity and no remark support, it is very likely the building does not offer an exercise room.

No listing advertises limousine or building car service, and MLS data shows no such amenity checked. This strongly indicates the building does not offer limo or house car service.

Listings highlight lobby, rooftop amenities, and storage but never describe any meeting or conference room. Given this and only 1 MLS record marking it, a meeting room is very unlikely.

Rooftop deck-style amenities are repeatedly mentioned, including a 'rooftop pool deck', 'roof top deck', and 'rooftop pool, BBQ, sauna and terrace.' Over a dozen listings from different agents highlight these common outdoor deck areas, indicating the building clearly offers patio/deck amenities accessible to residents.

Proximity to nearby parks and beaches is mentioned, but not an on-site jogging or walking path. With no MLS indication, the building does not appear to have its own jogging path.

Across all public remarks there is no mention of any children's playground or play structure. With no MLS support either, the building appears not to offer a playground.

Listings emphasize private lanais and rooftop common areas rather than any yard or garden spaces. Given the high-rise structure and absence of any 'private yard' language across numerous remarks, it is very likely the building does not offer private yard areas for units.

Listings describe a rooftop pool deck, BBQ, and saunas, but never a putting green. The absence of any reference plus 0/20 MLS checkmarks indicates no putting green is present.

Remarks repeatedly reference a rooftop amenity/recreation deck with pool, BBQ, saunas, and seating areas. This shared rooftop deck clearly functions as a common recreation area for residents.

Listings consistently describe common areas but never mention any recreation room or game/entertainment room. With only 1/20 MLS records marking this feature and no supporting remarks, a recreation room is very unlikely to exist.

At least one remark describes a craft brewery/gastropub located on the building’s ground floor, providing an on-site dining option. This qualifies as a restaurant amenity available within the building.

The building has a shared rooftop deck described with a pool, BBQ, saunas, showers, restrooms, and panoramic views. Multiple independent listings emphasize using the rooftop for swimming, grilling, and watching fireworks, confirming rooftop access and amenities.

Saunas are consistently listed as part of the rooftop amenity deck, with some remarks specifying separate men's and women's saunas. Strong, repeated mention across many listings and MLS data confirms this feature.

Roughly ten listings explicitly mention storage, using phrases like 'storage locker', 'extra storage space', 'personal storage unit at the front of the parking space', and '3 separate storage spaces assigned to this unit'. The repetition of dedicated lockers and storage rooms tied to stalls and floors across multiple independent listings strongly supports building-provided storage units as a standard amenity.

The public remarks explicitly list surfboard (and bike) storage or racks in several listings, confirming that surfboard storage is provided.

Across all remarks there is no reference to any tennis court or tennis facilities. Combined with 0/20 MLS entries showing this amenity, this strongly indicates the building does not have a tennis court.

Although not highlighted in the public remarks, 6 out of 20 MLS listings mark a trash chute amenity for this 28-story high-rise. Given the building type and recurring MLS indication, it is reasonably likely that a trash chute system is present.

Parking is consistently described as assigned or tandem stalls in a secured garage, plus guest parking, with no suggestion of valet services. The lack of 'valet' mention across many amenity lists strongly indicates the building does not provide valet service.

The building is presented as an urban high-rise with secured access, not as a gated or walled compound. No remarks indicate any perimeter wall or fencing, so wall/fence-style physical perimeter security is very unlikely to be present.

Any Jacuzzi reference is clearly in-unit, not a building amenity, and there is no mention of a common-area hot tub or spa. With no MLS support, the building likely does not have a shared whirlpool.

Multiple listings for Pavilion at Waikiki explicitly mention a building pool, often described as a 'rooftop pool' or 'rooftop swimming pool', including phrases like '28th floor rooftop pool highlighting mountain and ocean views' and 'newly renovated rooftop amenities include pool, men's and women's saunas, showers, restrooms, and a barbeque area.' Combined with 19/20 MLS entries checking pool-related amenities, there is strong, multi-agent evidence that the building has a common pool accessible to residents. This amenity is consistently tied to the rooftop deck and marketed as a key feature of the property.

None of the many remarks—some quite detailed about the 'newly renovated rooftop amenities'—describe the pool as heated, despite frequently highlighting it as a selling point. With only 1/20 MLS entries showing a heated-pool code and no corroborating text references, the evidence strongly indicates the rooftop pool is not heated and that the isolated 'heated pool' checkbox is likely incorrect. Buyers should expect a standard, unheated rooftop pool.

I searched the remarks for 'salt water pool', 'saltwater', 'saline', etc. The public remarks describe a rooftop pool but never specify it is salt water.

At least 10 of the provided listings clearly mention in-unit laundry, using phrases such as 'Washer & Dryer is in the unit', 'conveniently equipped with a washer and dryer in the unit', and 'including in-unit washer/dryer'. Combined with MLS data showing 20/20 listings including washer/dryer, this strongly supports that units in this building offer in-unit laundry, making it a key feature for buyers.

None of the roughly 20 listings reference a shared laundry room or 'community laundry' in their amenity lists, which instead consistently highlight rooftop pool, BBQ, sauna, guest parking, and storage. Given this omission plus 0/20 MLS mentions for community laundry and strong emphasis on in-unit washer/dryer, it is very likely the building does not offer notable shared laundry facilities.

I looked for terms such as 'coin laundry', 'coin-op', 'paid laundry', 'quarters', or 'card operated'. The public remarks do not reference any paid community laundry—they emphasize in-unit washers/dryers instead.

I searched the remarks for phrases like 'laundry on each floor', 'laundry room on every floor', or similar. Multiple listings repeatedly mention an in-unit washer/dryer but there are no statements indicating community laundry facilities on every floor.

Multiple listings mention included parking such as '1 assigned parking space', 'one parking condo', and '2 covered parking stalls (tandem)'. With 20/20 MLS entries showing parking-related codes and repeated references to a garage/lot, it is clear the building offers on-site parking for residents.

Many listings explicitly state that units come with an 'assigned' or 'deeded' stall, indicating spaces are reserved to specific condos. This pattern appears across multiple agents and units, confirming that assigned parking is a standard feature in the building.

Numerous remarks reference covered parking, including 'assigned garaged covered parking stall' and 'one secured and covered parking'. Combined with most MLS entries checking covered/garage options, this confirms the building provides covered parking stalls.

Public remarks explicitly describe deeded/assigned parking stalls for multiple units (including 'deeded tandem' stalls), supporting that parking is deeded/owned for units in this building.

Across all provided remarks, there are no references to EV charging, Tesla chargers, or vehicle charging infrastructure. With every current MLS entry omitting the EVCHRG checkbox, the evidence strongly indicates the building lacks dedicated EV parking/charging facilities.

I looked for phrases like 'monthly parking fee', 'parking rent', or specific dollar amounts for parking. None were found in the remarks, so monthly parking fee information is unknown from these listings.

At least ten separate listing remarks mention guest parking, including specific counts like '10 guest parking stalls' and descriptions of 'secured guest parking'. These consistent, detailed references across multiple agents confirm that the building offers designated guest parking stalls.

Multiple listings highlight secure parking access, with phrases like 'secure covered garage', 'one secured and covered parking', and key-fob controlled parking/entry. Together with MLS SECENT flags, this shows the parking facilities have secured entry rather than open, unenclosed access.

Several units are advertised with tandem parking arrangements, including 'TWO deeded tandem parking stalls' and '2 covered parking stalls(tandem)'. These repeated mentions confirm that the building offers tandem-style parking stalls for some units.

Listings consistently describe self-parking in assigned/covered/guest stalls but never mention valet or attendant services. With all MLS entries omitting any valet checkbox, the evidence strongly supports that valet parking is not available at this building.

I searched for 'parking waitlist', 'waiting list for parking', and similar terms. While storage (surfboard/bike) is noted as waitlisted, there is no evidence of a parking waitlist in the public remarks.

Multiple remarks reference elevator access control, including a listing that explicitly notes 'keyed elevators' and another mentioning a 'secured elevator ride.' This directly supports that the building uses keyed or fob-secured elevators.

Remarks explicitly reference keyed/key fob/call box secured entry and keyed elevators, which confirms card/fob electronic access for building entry.

No listings reference a 'security guard,' '24-hour security,' or similar personnel-based security, despite extensive amenity descriptions. Security is described instead as secured entry and access control, indicating there is no staffed guard service at this building.

I looked for terms like 'security patrol', 'roving security', or similar. The remarks emphasize secured entry and a resident manager, but do not mention any security patrol service.

None of the many listings for this building note any video surveillance or security cameras. Agents consistently emphasize other security measures but never describe CCTV or video systems, suggesting such a system is not a notable or advertised building feature.

Central air conditioning is clearly a building-standard feature: at least 15+ listings explicitly mention 'central AC', 'Central A/C', or 'central air conditioning', and several note that maintenance fees include air conditioning. MLS checkbox data (ACCEN/CENAC on 16/20 listings and ACCEN on 20/20) aligns with these remarks, indicating a shared central HVAC system serving the units. No remarks suggest any alternative primary cooling system.

Across all provided remarks, there are zero references to split, ductless, or mini-split AC, while many listings emphasize central AC as the unit’s cooling. MLS data also shows 0/20 listings with split AC indicated, suggesting split systems are not present in this building’s units. The evidence strongly supports that buyers should not expect split AC here.

No listing remarks describe window or wall AC units, even though agents frequently highlight cooling and utilities and uniformly reference central AC. MLS checkbox data likewise shows 0/20 listings indicating window AC, so there is strong evidence that window units are not a feature in this building. Buyers should assume cooling is provided exclusively by central AC, not window units.

The Pavilion at Waikiki is a multi-story Waikiki condo tower, and 18/20 recent MLS listings mark its construction as concrete. No remarks mention any non-concrete structural system, so we treat concrete construction as a well-supported building characteristic.

The building is consistently characterized as a concrete high-rise rather than double-wall construction, and only a small minority of listings check the DOUWAL box. With no supporting remarks, we treat double-wall as not a documented building construction type here.

Hollow tile is not mentioned in any remarks and appears in just 2/20 MLS records, which is consistent with sporadic checkbox misuse rather than a building-wide construction type. We therefore do not record hollow tile as a defining construction material for this tower.

Masonry/stucco is rarely checked in MLS and never mentioned in remarks for this building, whereas concrete is consistently selected. The few MASSTU entries are best treated as isolated checkbox noise, so we do not classify the building as masonry/stucco construction.

Agents consistently identify the building as concrete rather than steel frame, and no remarks mention steel framing. The lack of any STEFRA entries across 20 listings makes a steel-frame classification very unlikely.

The vast majority of listings do not classify the building with the SLAB construction code, and there are no remarks referencing a slab foundation. To avoid relying on a single outlier checkbox with no narrative support, we do not record slab construction as a documented feature.

No analysis available

No listings or remarks describe any wood-frame construction, and all available MLS data omit the wood-frame checkbox. Given the building’s high-rise form and concrete classification, wood-frame construction is effectively ruled out.

Several listings explicitly tag the building as Above Ground, and by its nature the Pavilion at Waikiki is a multi-level high-rise with residential floors elevated well above ground level. Despite inconsistent MLS usage, the physical configuration supports treating above-ground construction as present.

There are no textual references to brick construction and nearly all MLS records omit BRICK despite many different agents and listings. We therefore treat the lone BRICK checkbox as a mis-click and do not classify the building as brick-constructed.

No agents mark or describe any single-wall construction, and this method is inconsistent with a 20+ story concrete condo tower. We can confidently exclude single-wall construction for this building.

Multiple listings explicitly state a 30-day minimum rental period or 30+ day rentals only. That language indicates short-term (less-than-30-day) vacation rentals are not allowed in this building.

There is no evidence in the remarks of a hotel rental pool or hotel-managed rental program. Because STRs are not allowed (30-day minimum), hotel rental pool participation cannot apply.

The remarks contain no reference to a mandatory hotel or rental pool, and since short-term rentals are not permitted, mandatory pool participation is not supported by the listings.

At least two separate listings describe their units as 'fee simple,' confirming that fee simple ownership exists in this building. No remarks mention leasehold or lease rent, suggesting fee simple is the predominant tenure type here.

No listing remarks indicate leasehold status, lease rent, or lease expiry, which are typically highlighted when present in Waikiki buildings. Combined with explicit 'fee simple' descriptions and no LH entries in MLS data, this strongly suggests the building does not offer leasehold units.

I searched for phrases like 'lease expires', 'leasehold', 'ground lease', and specific years (e.g., 2050). No lease expiry year or leasehold language was found; listings predominantly reference fee simple ownership.

Public remarks explicitly state the Pavilion at Waikiki is VA approved/VA acceptable in multiple listings, indicating VA financing is permitted for units in this building.

Public remarks explicitly describe the building as "100% fully insured," indicating comprehensive walls-in / HOA insurance coverage. This direct language provides high confidence the building is fully insured by the HOA.

Dozens of remarks detail building systems and amenities (pool, saunas, rooftop deck, insurance status) but never mention fire sprinklers, and a single FIRSPR checkbox is likely an agent error. Given the age of the building and lack of any textual confirmation, it is highly likely there is no building-wide fire sprinkler system.

Searched the remarks for terms like 'fire life safety', 'FLSE', 'fire inspection', and 'life safety compliant' and found no references. With no current field value provided and no supporting language in remarks, the feature is set to false with medium confidence (absence of evidence).

Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.

No analysis available

Many high-floor units and the rooftop deck have direct ocean views across Fort DeRussy Park toward the Pacific. Remarks repeatedly highlight 'ocean view' and 'Pacific' from both individual lanais and the pool deck, and MLS view data supports this. Buyers can clearly find ocean-view units in this building.

Units on the mauka/cool side and some higher floors feature prominent mountain and Ala Wai Canal vistas. Remarks like 'breathtaking city and mountain views' and 'Great canal, city and mountain views' appear in multiple independent listings. Mountain views are a consistent selling point for this building.

Select higher-floor and penthouse units, as well as the rooftop deck, enjoy Diamond Head vistas. Phrases like 'amazing Diamond Head...view' and 'peek-a-boo view of Diamond Head from the open lanai' confirm this across multiple remarks. Diamond Head views are available from certain exposures in the building.

City and urban Waikiki skyline views are common from many stacks and floors. Multiple agents mention 'stunning...city views', 'park and city view', and 'breathtaking city and mountain views'. Cityscape outlooks are a core characteristic of this building’s view offerings.

High-floor and ocean-side units look across the park toward the shoreline, offering more than just a straight-on water view. The COASTL flag in MLS and repeated references to expansive views over Fort DeRussy to the ocean imply visible stretches of coastline. Coastline vistas appear available from select exposures and floors.

Units facing Fort DeRussy enjoy lush, landscaped park vistas that agents sometimes classify as garden views. The MLS GARDEN view flag on one listing supports this interpretation. Buyers can expect green, landscaped outlooks in addition to ocean/park views from some units.

Some units and lanais look toward the Ala Wai Golf Course across the canal, providing fairway/greens vistas. Phrases like 'amazing...golf course views from your lanai and bedroom' and 'views of the canal, golf course, city and mountain' provide direct evidence. This confirms that golf course views are available from certain stacks and floors.

Several units face the Ala Wai Canal, offering direct water and canal vistas, and the rooftop deck emphasizes panoramic canal views. Remarks such as 'view of the Ala Wai Canal' and '360 panoramic views of the Ala Wai Canal and mountains' demonstrate consistent canal/marina-type outlooks. Buyers seeking water-adjacent views (canal/harbor style) can find them here.

East-facing and mountain-side units offer morning light and direct sunrise vistas over the canal and Ko‘olau range. The explicit phrase 'sunrise views' confirms this orientation for at least one high-floor stack. Sunrise views are a real option in this building depending on exposure.

Ocean-facing units and the rooftop amenity deck showcase evening sun and colorful sunset skies over the Pacific. Several agents emphasize 'golden sunsets' and ocean-and-sunset views as a key selling point. Sunset and Friday-night-fireworks viewing from the building is repeatedly highlighted.

Across many independent listings, views are consistently described as ocean, park, city, canal, mountain, Diamond Head, golf course, sunrise, and sunset, with no reference to any cemetery. Given both MLS and narrative descriptions, it is highly likely this building does not have cemetery views. This is treated as an intentional exclusion rather than a correction of past data.

Multiple remarks explicitly state residents can watch Friday night/Hilton fireworks from private lanais and/or the rooftop, confirming fireworks views from the building.

No analysis available

No analysis available

The building is repeatedly advertised as 'pet-friendly' and 'Pet Friendly! Up to 30 lbs' by multiple agents in different listings. This consistent language, without any contrary 'no pets' restrictions, confirms that pets are allowed in the building.

Several independent remarks state the building has a 'building manager,' 'property manager on-site,' or 'resident manager,' confirming on-site management. MLS amenity data (RESMAN in 16/20 listings) is consistent with these descriptions.

The building operates with a minimum 30-day rental period, which is typical of residential condos, not hotel-style nightly rentals. The absence of any hotel program or condotel language across extensive remarks indicates it is not a condotel.

Ownership is repeatedly characterized as 'fee simple' condominium rather than share-based cooperative ownership. The lack of any 'co-op' or 'cooperative' language across many listings confirms this is not a co-op building.