Parkway C1
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Parkway C1
Building Overview
Parkway C1 — neighborhood not specified in MLS; built in 1980. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed.
About Parkway C1
Parkway C1 is a condominium building recorded as built in 1980. According to available MLS records, neighborhood and detailed size or construction-type information are not provided in the data set.
Key recorded policies for Parkway C1 include no pets allowed and no short-term rentals permitted. The MLS data does not list onsite amenities, building facilities, or unit mix; the management company is shown as unknown in the available records.
Additional details such as parking, maintenance fees, assessments, guest policies, and specific building rules are not included in the provided MLS information. Based on MLS data analysis, buyers should verify all building details, rules, and financials with the listing agent or management before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across the available data, there are no mentions of common area electricity, common electric, or building power being included in the HOA or maintenance fees. Given the complete absence of such references and no prior confirmations, it is most likely that common area electricity is not included in the maintenance fees.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There are no references to 'hot water included' or similar phrases in the available listing data, nor any conflicting user verification. Because this is a commonly advertised benefit when present, the lack of any mention indicates that hot water is not part of the maintenance fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings mention sewer charges being covered by HOA or maintenance fees. In the absence of any explicit indication across all available information, sewer is most likely not included in the maintenance fees.
No listing text indicates that water is included in the HOA/maintenance fees (e.g., 'water included', 'water in HOA'). Given that such a benefit would ordinarily be explicitly noted, the best-supported conclusion is that water is not included in the maintenance fees.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across the provided data, there are no public remarks to review, and no prior records indicate an exercise room or gym. With no textual evidence, this amenity cannot be verified for the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Because there are no public remarks to analyze and no historical data for this feature, there is no indication of a recreation area in the building. The existence of such an amenity remains unverified.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across the provided data, there are no public remarks at all mentioning storage units, storage lockers, or extra/additional storage space. With no historical or user-verified evidence to the contrary, storage is not treated as a building feature here.
No analysis available
No listing remarks were provided, so there is no evidence of any tennis court amenities. Without explicit mention, a tennis court cannot be confirmed for this property.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across the available data, there are no remarks mentioning a pool, swimming pool, or any similar amenity. With no historical evidence or user verification suggesting a pool exists, it is treated as unlikely that the building offers this feature, but with only moderate confidence due to limited data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across the available listing data (with effectively 0 usable public remarks), there are no mentions of an in-unit washer, dryer, or in-unit laundry. Since this amenity is typically highlighted when present and we have no corroborating evidence from other sources, we currently assume the building does not offer in-unit laundry in its units, pending future listings that might indicate otherwise.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings with public remarks were available and there is no prior data mentioning parking, garages, or stalls. In the absence of any evidence, parking is presumed not to be offered, but this is uncertain and should be verified on-site or from more complete MLS data.
No analysis available
No listings with public remarks reference covered parking, garages, or carports. With no supporting evidence, covered parking is presumed absent, though this remains uncertain without fuller MLS or on-site verification.
The remarks explicitly mention 'two assigned parking stalls (one covered)', which indicates assigned parking, but there is no explicit statement that the stalls are deeded/owned. Because 'deeded' is not stated, deeded parking is not confirmed in the public remarks.
No analysis available
I searched for 'parking fee', 'monthly parking', 'additional parking cost', etc., and found no references. No monthly parking fee information is available in the remarks.
There are no listings with remarks mentioning guest or visitor parking. Guest parking is therefore assumed not to be available, but this assumption is low-confidence due to missing detailed data.
No analysis available
No listings with public remarks mention tandem parking or tandem stalls. Tandem parking is presumed not present, but this is a low-confidence inference given the lack of descriptive MLS remarks.
No analysis available
I looked for 'parking waitlist', 'join waitlist', or similar language and found none. The remarks only reference assigned stalls and guest/street parking.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across the provided data, there are no remarks or descriptions referencing split systems, mini-splits, or ductless AC. With no mentions and no prior evidence, there is currently insufficient indication that any units in this building have split AC systems.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across the provided listings, there are no public remarks available, so nothing mentions 'double wall' or similar construction terms. With no historical or user-verified evidence, double-wall construction cannot be confirmed and is treated as not present. This should be updated if future listings explicitly describe double-wall construction for the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The listings supplied have no public remarks, and none mention 'above ground construction' or equivalent phrasing. In the absence of any explicit or historical evidence, above-ground construction is not verified and is treated as not present as a distinct advertised feature. This can be revised if future remarks clearly state that the building is constructed above ground as a selling point.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for phrases like 'short-term rental allowed', 'vacation rental', 'NUC', 'TVU', or minimum night rules and found no references. With no evidence in the remarks, short-term rentals are not indicated as allowed.
I searched for 'hotel rental pool', 'hotel program', or hotel management references and found none. Because short-term rentals are not indicated, hotel pool participation is also not indicated.
I looked for explicit language such as 'mandatory hotel pool' or 'required to participate' and found none. Since STRs are not indicated, mandatory pool participation is not supported by the remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for phrases such as 'lease expires', 'land lease to', or explicit years (e.g., 2050) indicating leasehold expiry but found no such information. Unable to determine lease expiry year from the remarks.
I searched the remarks for phrases like 'VA approved', 'VA financing', or 'VA loans accepted' and found none. Therefore VA financing approval is assumed not indicated in the remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
There are no public remarks available to review for this building, so there is no mention of ocean or water views. Because there is no supporting evidence, ocean views are set to false by default with low confidence and should be revisited when more listings or remarks are available.
With no public remarks to analyze, there are no references to mountain or mauka views. Mountain views are therefore set to false by default, but this may change if future listings explicitly describe such views.
No analysis available
Because no public remarks were provided, there are no statements about city or urban views. City views are currently marked false by default and should be updated if future listings highlight this feature.
No public remarks were available to confirm coastline or shoreline views for any units in the building. Coastline views are therefore set to false by default, pending any future listings that explicitly mention this feature.
In the absence of any public remarks, there is no indication of garden or courtyard views. Garden views are set to false by default and may need revision if later listings describe such views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.