Parkway A
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Parkway A
Building Overview
Parkway A in Kaneohe (1975): wood-frame building with pool and fitness center.
About Parkway A
Parkway A is a residential building located in the Kaneohe neighborhood. The building was constructed in 1975 and is wood frame. Unit and total building size are not specified in the available MLS data.
Amenities at Parkway A include an on-site pool and a fitness center. Air conditioning is provided via split systems. No additional amenities or common area details are listed in the MLS records provided.
Parking is available and includes covered, assigned spaces plus guest parking. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed according to the MLS data. The management company is listed as unknown in the available records. Based on MLS data; buyers should verify all information, including fees, rules, and unit specifics, with the listing agent or managing entity.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
The listings repeatedly describe Parkway A as having a 'high owner occupancy rate,' which strongly suggests a predominantly owner-occupied community. However, no remark provides a numeric percentage, so the exact owner-occupancy rate remains unknown.
I searched the remarks for explicit elevator references such as 'elevators,' 'lifts,' or 'multiple elevators' and found none. The listings describe a townhouse/condo community with carport parking and amenities, but nothing indicates elevator service.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Common-area electricity appears to be included in the maintenance fee. The MLS pattern is highly consistent across listings, with OTCOEX appearing in 12 of 15 current listings. Public remarks do not explicitly mention utility inclusions, but there is no evidence against the feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Hot water does not appear to be included in the maintenance fee. The dominant MLS pattern is WTRHTR in 13 of 15 listings, with only one HOTWAT flag, which is a strong signal that the building does not supply hot water as a common fee item. One remark explicitly mentions a "solar water heater," reinforcing that hot water is generated at the unit level rather than included by the HOA.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer appears to be included in the maintenance fee. MLS data is nearly unanimous, with SEWER marked in 14 of 15 current listings. Public remarks do not mention sewer directly, but there is no conflicting evidence.
Water appears to be included in the maintenance fee. The MLS data is highly consistent, with WATER present in 14 of 15 listings. No public remarks suggest a change or exclusion, so confidence remains very high.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks do not use the word 'clubhouse' often, but they do describe a 'private recreation center' and 'party room,' which fits the broader clubhouse/community-center definition. Because this is supported by multiple listings, it is reasonable to treat the feature as present, though with slightly lower confidence than tennis courts.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
This feature is strongly supported across many listings: several remarks say "fitness center," "gym," or "exercise gym." The wording is consistent across multiple agents and matches the historical MLS confidence, so this appears to be a real shared community amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence that this building offers patio/deck-type amenities or outdoor spaces. I found mentions in numerous listings—phrases like "lanai," "2 lanais," "balcony," "open decks," and "wood deck off of living room" appear repeatedly, indicating this is a common building feature available to buyers. The consistency across multiple listings makes the evidence very strong.
There is no substantive remark-level evidence for a jogging or walking path in these listings. Because the MLS signal is very weak and unsupported by the public remarks, this feature is treated as absent for now.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
At least 2-3 listings reference shared recreation space directly or with close equivalents such as 'recreation area,' 'recreation center,' and 'recreation room.' This is sufficient evidence that the building/community offers a recreation area amenity for buyers searching for it.
This amenity is supported by both the MLS history and remarks. Most references describe a private recreation center, party room, or recreation room, which indicates a shared community space rather than a unit-specific feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage is strongly supported across the current remarks and historical MLS data. Multiple listings mention "additional attic and carport storage," "additional storage in the carport," and a "private storage closet," indicating this is a shared building feature available to buyers. The evidence appears consistent across many agents rather than a single copy-paste note.
No analysis available
Tennis facilities are mentioned in many of the listings, often paired with pool, basketball, and gym amenities. The repeated references across multiple remarks strongly confirm that the building/community offers tennis courts.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Pool is strongly supported by both historical MLS amenities and current listing remarks. Multiple listings mention it explicitly, including phrases such as "pool," "swimming pool," "residents here enjoy amenities such as a pool," and "private recreation center including a swimming pool." The evidence is repeated across many listings and appears consistent rather than a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
In-unit laundry appears to be a real building feature with strong historical support: 13 of 15 listings show washer/dryer included. Current remarks reinforce this with explicit language such as "a laundry room on the first level" and "an enclosed wash area," suggesting the feature is not just a copy-paste checkbox but part of the unit layouts.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Parking is clearly present building-wide. Across the remarks, multiple listings mention 'two parking stalls,' 'carport parking,' '2 tandem parking stalls,' and 'ample street parking,' which strongly confirms that buyers can expect parking in this community.
Assigned parking is well supported by both MLS flags and the listing remarks. At least several listings explicitly describe 'two assigned parking stalls/spaces,' which is strong evidence this feature is available in the building.
Covered parking is strongly supported across the dataset. Multiple remarks mention carports or covered stalls, including phrases like 'one covered,' 'carport parking,' and '2-car carport,' making this a very high-confidence feature.
I searched for phrases like "deeded parking," "owned stall," and "parking included in deed" and found none. The remarks only mention assigned, tandem, covered, carport, guest, and street parking.
No analysis available
I looked for any parking charge, monthly parking rental, or additional parking cost and found nothing. The listings describe the parking configuration but do not state any fee.
Guest parking is supported by both the MLS data and the remarks. Several listings explicitly mention guest parking availability, and the repeated references across agents suggest this is a real building feature rather than a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
Tandem parking is well supported. Multiple remarks clearly state '2 tandem parking stalls,' which aligns with the strong MLS tandem flags and indicates this feature is genuinely available in the building.
No analysis available
I searched for "parking waitlist," "waiting list," and similar wording and found none. The remarks instead indicate assigned stalls, guest parking, and ample street parking.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Split AC is well supported across the remarks. At least 6 listings explicitly mention 'split AC' or 'split A/C,' with details like 'split AC units in both the living area and primary bedroom' and 'split AC in the living area and primary bedroom.' The evidence is consistent across multiple listings/agents and aligns with the historical MLS data showing ACSPL in several listings.
Window AC has only limited support: historical data shows 4/14 listings with ACWIUN, and one remark mentions 'air conditioning units for climate control.' The language is somewhat generic and could reflect copied MLS data, so confidence is moderate rather than high.
I do not find support for concrete construction in the public remarks. Across the listings, the language instead points to townhouse/wood-deck construction, and the concrete checkbox appears only in a minority of MLS records (6/14), suggesting inconsistent agent entry rather than a verified building feature.
Double wall construction has moderate support from the MLS, with 7 of 15 listings marked DOUWAL. The public remarks are silent on construction type, so this is based mainly on the repeated MLS coding rather than direct narrative confirmation. It remains plausible as a building-level feature, but the evidence is not as strong as for wood frame.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Wood frame construction appears to be a consistent building-level characteristic. The current MLS data show 11 of 15 listings marked WOOFRA, and none of the public remarks conflict with that classification. Because the feature is not usually spelled out in remarks, the repeated MLS checkbox pattern is the strongest evidence.
Above-ground construction appears likely for this building. The current MLS data show 11 of 15 listings marked ABOGRO, while the remarks consistently describe standard townhouse living and do not suggest any below-grade or contrary construction. This looks like a building-level feature supported more by MLS consistency than explicit remark language.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for short-term rental indicators such as STR, NUC, TVU, vacation rental, or legal short-term rental language and found none. Since there is no public remark supporting STR permission, this is best treated as not evidenced/likely not allowed from the listings.
I searched for hotel rental pool references like hotel-managed operations or branded pool programs and found none. Because short-term rental allowance is not evidenced, hotel pool participation must be false.
I looked for language indicating a mandatory rental pool, such as required participation or no opt-out, and found none. With no evidence of STR permission or a hotel pool, mandatory pool participation is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for leasehold wording such as "lease expires," "ground lease ends," or any 4-digit expiration year and found nothing. Because no lease term is stated in the remarks, the expiry year cannot be extracted.
I searched the public remarks for VA-related language such as "VA approved," "VA financing," and "VA loans accepted" and found none. With no explicit evidence, this remains unsupported from the listings.
I looked for HOA insurance wording like 'fully insured,' 'full insurance,' 'walls-in coverage,' or similar phrases and found no references. The remarks do not provide any public evidence that the building is fully insured by the HOA.
No analysis available
I searched for fire/life safety language such as 'FLSE passed,' 'fire life safety evaluation passed,' 'life safety compliant,' or 'passed fire inspection' and found nothing. The remarks focus on unit updates and community amenities, with no public statement about fire/life safety certification.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Garden views are strongly supported across multiple listings and multiple agents, not just a single pasted remark. At least several current remarks describe the building/unit setting as a "garden setting" with "tropical lush greenery" and "gorgeous landscape," which aligns with the prior MLS view data showing GARDEN in many listings. This appears to be a persistent building characteristic rather than a one-off unit feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is limited but real evidence that some units in the building offer sunrise views: 2 of 13 listings currently carry SUNRIS in the MLS view field. None of the public remarks explicitly say 'sunrise' or 'morning sun,' so this appears to rely mostly on MLS data rather than agent descriptions. Confidence is moderate because the feature is present in some listings, but the remarks do not strongly corroborate it.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.