Parkway A
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Parkway A
Building Overview
Parkway A in Kaneohe (1975): wood-frame building with pool and fitness center.
About Parkway A
Parkway A is a residential building located in the Kaneohe neighborhood. The building was constructed in 1975 and is wood frame. Unit and total building size are not specified in the available MLS data.
Amenities at Parkway A include an on-site pool and a fitness center. Air conditioning is provided via split systems. No additional amenities or common area details are listed in the MLS records provided.
Parking is available and includes covered, assigned spaces plus guest parking. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed according to the MLS data. The management company is listed as unknown in the available records. Based on MLS data; buyers should verify all information, including fees, rules, and unit specifics, with the listing agent or managing entity.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
The listings clearly indicate a strong owner-occupancy community, including phrases like 'high owner occupancy rate' and 'highly owner occupied.' However, no numeric percentage such as '80% owner occupied' appears, so the exact value remains unknown.
I searched the public remarks for explicit references such as 'elevators,' 'lifts,' or 'multiple elevators' and found none. The listings focus on townhouse layout, parking, and amenities across the street, so there is no evidence to confirm a building elevator count.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Common-area electricity appears to be included in the maintenance fee. The MLS pattern is highly consistent across listings, with OTCOEX appearing in 11 of 14 current records. No public remarks suggest otherwise, so this looks like a building-level inclusion rather than a copy/paste anomaly.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Hot water does not appear to be included in the maintenance fee. The dominant MLS pattern is WTRHTR in 12 of 14 listings, with only one HOTWAT flag, and the remarks include a solar water heater reference rather than building-supplied hot water. That makes inclusion of hot water unlikely for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer appears to be included in the maintenance fee. MLS data is nearly unanimous, with SEWER marked in 13 of 14 current listings. Public remarks do not mention any exception, so this is a very strong building-level feature.
Water appears to be included in the maintenance fee. The MLS data is highly consistent, with WATER present in 13 of 14 listings. No public remarks suggest a change or exception, so this is very likely a shared building-level inclusion.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks do not use the word 'clubhouse' often, but they do describe a 'private recreation center' and 'party room,' which fits the broader clubhouse/community-center definition. Because this is supported by multiple listings, it is reasonable to treat the feature as present, though with slightly lower confidence than tennis courts.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings explicitly describe an on-site or nearby shared fitness amenity, using phrases like "gym," "exercise gym," and "fitness center." This appears across several remarks from different listings, not just a single agent copy-paste, and aligns with the historical MLS amenity data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence that this building offers patio/deck-type amenities or outdoor spaces. I found mentions in numerous listings—phrases like "lanai," "2 lanais," "balcony," "open decks," and "wood deck off of living room" appear repeatedly, indicating this is a common building feature available to buyers. The consistency across multiple listings makes the evidence very strong.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
At least 2-3 listings reference shared recreation space directly or with close equivalents such as 'recreation area,' 'recreation center,' and 'recreation room.' This is sufficient evidence that the building/community offers a recreation area amenity for buyers searching for it.
The building's amenities are described as including a "recreation room," as well as a "private recreation center" with a "party room." While fewer listings mention it than tennis or gym, the direct wording in multiple remarks is enough to confirm the shared recreation-room feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage is strongly supported across many current listings and appears in both building-level and unit-level descriptions. At least several remarks explicitly mention "additional storage in the carport," "exterior storage closet," "additional storage in the attic," and a "private storage closet," which is consistent with the MLS checkbox data and suggests this is not a one-off copy-paste error.
No analysis available
Tennis courts are mentioned in many of the listings, often alongside pool and basketball amenities, with wording such as "tennis courts" and "tennis court right across the street." The repeated references across multiple remarks and the strong historical checkbox data make this feature highly reliable.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The pool amenity is strongly supported. Multiple current listings explicitly mention it, with phrases such as "pool," "swimming pool," and "residents have access to a private recreation center including a swimming pool." This is consistent across numerous listings and appears to be a real shared community amenity rather than copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
In-unit laundry appears to be a real building feature. The MLS data shows washer/dryer included in 12 of 14 recent listings, and remarks mention an "enclosed wash area" and a "laundry room" in unit. This is repeated across multiple listings and reads like consistent listing data rather than a one-off agent error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Parking is clearly present across the building. Across the remarks, many listings mention parking in some form, including 'two parking stalls,' '2 tandem parking stalls,' 'carport parking,' and '2 assigned parking spaces.' This aligns with the current MLS data showing parking on all 14/14 listings, so the evidence is very strong and consistent.
Assigned parking is supported by both MLS flags and the remarks. At least two current remark sets explicitly say 'two assigned parking spaces,' which matches the MLS data showing assignment on a subset of listings. The repeated wording suggests this is a real building feature, not just a one-off agent error.
Covered parking is strongly supported. Multiple listings describe carport or covered stall arrangements, including '1 covered,' 'carport parking,' and '2-car carport.' The MLS data also shows covered parking on all 14/14 listings, making this a high-confidence building feature.
I checked for wording like "deeded parking," "owned stall," or "parking included in deed" and found none. The remarks consistently describe parking as assigned, tandem, or carport-based, which suggests use rights rather than deeded ownership.
No analysis available
I searched for any stated parking fee, monthly charge, or rental cost and found none. The remarks only mention the number and type of parking spaces, not any separate fee.
Guest parking is supported by both the MLS data and the listing remarks. Several remarks explicitly note 'guest parking available' or 'plenty of guest parking,' which is consistent with the current MLS flags on 9/14 listings. The evidence appears consistent across multiple agents and listings.
No analysis available
Tandem parking is well supported. Multiple remarks explicitly state '2 tandem parking stalls,' and the MLS data flags tandem on 9/14 listings. This repeated phrasing across listings makes the feature highly credible for the building.
No analysis available
I looked for "parking waitlist," "waiting list," or similar language and found nothing. The remarks describe available assigned, tandem, guest, and street parking instead.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Split AC is well supported across multiple remarks, with several listings explicitly stating 'split A/C' or 'split AC in the living area and primary bedroom.' This appears consistently in the building’s remarks rather than as a one-off checkbox, so confidence is very high.
Window AC has only limited support: historical data shows 4/14 listings with ACWIUN, and one remark mentions 'air conditioning units for climate control.' The language is somewhat generic and could reflect copied MLS data, so confidence is moderate rather than high.
I do not find support for concrete construction in the public remarks. Across the listings, the language instead points to townhouse/wood-deck construction, and the concrete checkbox appears only in a minority of MLS records (6/14), suggesting inconsistent agent entry rather than a verified building feature.
In current MLS data, 6/11 listings mark double wall (DOUWAL) as a construction material, and none of the remarks conflict with this. While fewer listings check this box compared to other materials and the remarks are silent on construction details, the majority usage suggests the building employs double-wall construction.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Wood frame construction appears to be a building-level feature. Current MLS data show 10/14 listings with WOOFRA, and the public remarks are consistent with a townhouse-style residential structure rather than a concrete tower, with references to wood decks and typical framed-home layouts.
Above ground construction appears likely for this building. The MLS shows 10/14 listings with ABOGRO, and the remarks repeatedly describe normal above-grade townhouse layouts with first and second floors, lanais, and space under the unit, which fits the feature even though it is not explicitly called out in the remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for signs that short-term rentals are allowed, including STR, vacation rental, NUC, TVU, or similar references, and found none. The listings read like standard residential resale descriptions, so there is no public evidence that STR is permitted.
I looked for mentions of a hotel rental pool, hotel-managed program, or branded rental pool arrangement and found none. Since the remarks do not support short-term rentals, a hotel pool cannot be inferred.
I searched for language indicating owners must participate in a rental pool or cannot opt out, and found none. The remarks instead emphasize standard residential ownership and occupancy, so mandatory pooling is not supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for leasehold language such as "lease expires," "ground lease," or any 4-digit lease end year, but nothing appeared. Since no lease-expiry year is stated, this remains unknown from the public remarks.
I searched the public remarks for terms like "VA approved," "VA financing," and "VA loans accepted" and found none. The listings focus on unit features, parking, and amenities, with no indication of VA eligibility.
I searched the remarks for insurance-related wording such as 'fully insured,' 'full insurance,' or 'walls-in coverage' and found no references. The listings do not provide HOA insurance details, so this cannot be verified from the public remarks.
No analysis available
I looked for direct language like 'fire life safety evaluation passed,' 'FLSE passed,' 'life safety compliant,' and similar phrases, but found nothing in the remarks. Without an explicit mention, this feature cannot be confirmed from the public listings.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Garden views are supported by both MLS view data and multiple listing remarks. At least 6 of 14 listings show GARDEN in view_descriptions, and several agents independently describe the setting as a "garden setting," "tropical lush greenery," or "gorgeous landscape." This is consistent across multiple listings and appears to reflect actual building exposure, not just MLS checkbox noise.
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is limited but real evidence that some units in the building offer sunrise views: 2 of 13 listings currently carry SUNRIS in the MLS view field. None of the public remarks explicitly say 'sunrise' or 'morning sun,' so this appears to rely mostly on MLS data rather than agent descriptions. Confidence is moderate because the feature is present in some listings, but the remarks do not strongly corroborate it.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.