Parkland Gardens
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Parkland Gardens
Building Overview
Parkland Gardens in Downtown-Chinatown; concrete building (1976) with a resident manager and no-pets policy, per MLS data.
About Parkland Gardens
Based on MLS data, Parkland Gardens is located in the Downtown-Chinatown neighborhood. The building was constructed in 1976 and is of concrete construction. Specific information on number of units or building square footage is not provided in the available MLS records.
Key features listed in MLS include an on-site resident manager. The building does not allow pets and short-term rentals are not permitted, according to the available data. The management company is listed as Unknown in MLS records.
MLS information also indicates covered and assigned parking with guest parking available. Buyers should verify all details, including fees, exact unit sizes, management arrangements, and any additional building rules, with the listing agent or management, as this summary is based solely on MLS data.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
There is no percentage or qualitative statement about owner-occupancy in the public remarks. Without any explicit owner-occupancy data or a current value to retain, the percentage is unknown.
The public remarks do not state the number of elevators. No explicit elevator counts or related phrases were found, and there is no current numeric value to retain, so the number remains unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All three public remarks explicitly state that maintenance fees cover electricity (phrases: "electricity is included in maintenance fees", "Maintenance fees cover electricity", "Maintenance fees cover ELECTRICITY"). Evidence is consistent across multiple agents/listings and matches MLS association_fee_includes (ELECTR in 3/3 listings), so confidence is high.
All three public remarks explicitly note that maintenance fees cover gas (phrases: "Maintenance fees covers gas", "Maintenance fees cover... gas", "Maintenance fees cover gas"). This consistent, repeated wording across listings aligns with MLS checkboxes (GAS in 3/3), giving high confidence.
No public remarks (0/3) mention hot water being included, while MLS association_fee_includes only had HOTWAT in 1/3 listings and there are no WTRHTR inclusion indicators. Because remarks do not confirm it and MLS evidence is limited/partial, hot water being included is doubtful but not definitively disproven.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Each of the three public remarks mentions water/sewer being covered (phrases: "Maintenance fees covers... sewer", "Maintenance fees cover water/sewer", "Maintenance fees cover water/sewer"). The repeated explicit mentions across multiple listings and matching MLS checkboxes (SEWER in 3/3) provide strong evidence.
All three public remarks explicitly state that maintenance fees cover water (phrases: "Maintenance fees covers... water", "Maintenance fees cover water/sewer", "Maintenance fees cover water/sewer"). This consistent confirmation across listings and MLS data (WATER in 3/3) yields high confidence.
All three public remarks mention BBQ facilities (e.g., "BBQ with friends"; "a private park with a BBQ"; "...tennis courts, BBQ, and gazebo"). Evidence is consistent across multiple agent remarks and supports including BBQ as a building amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Each of the three remarks references shared recreation space (phrases like "a private park", "gazebo", "community laundry", "private garden"). These repeated references across listings support marking a building recreation area as available.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All three listings reference tennis facilities (e.g., "community tennis court", "a tennis court", "private park with tennis courts"). Multiple agent remarks consistently cite the tennis court, so the building-level tennis court amenity is supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All three listings' MLS data indicate assigned parking and public remarks confirm a stall is included. Remarks explicitly state "1 secured, covered parking stall included," and other listings reference "1-Covered parking," supporting that the unit comes with an assigned/reserved parking stall.
All three listings list covered parking and the remarks repeatedly state covered parking or a covered stall: "1 secured, covered parking stall included" and "1-Covered parking." The evidence is consistent across multiple agent remarks and MLS data.
Public remarks explicitly state a secured, covered parking stall is included with the unit, which is typically interpreted as deeded/owned parking. Given the explicit language, this is set to true with high confidence.
No analysis available
I searched for 'parking fee', 'monthly parking', 'parking rental' and similar terms. The remarks state parking is included with the unit and provide no separate parking fee, so there is no parking_fee to report.
MLS data shows guest parking on all listings and a public remark explicitly states "guest parking and 1 secured, covered parking stall included." Multiple listings and agents consistently reference guest parking, indicating the building offers visitor parking.
While only one MLS checkbox listed secured entry, multiple public remarks state the building is "secured" and mention a "secured, covered parking stall included," providing consistent agent-level confirmation that the parking/entry is secured.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for 'parking waitlist', 'waiting list for parking', and related terms. Only the private garden is noted as having a waitlist; there is no evidence of a parking waitlist in the remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
One of three recent MLS listings for the building lists HOLTIL (hollow tile) as a construction material, but none of the public remarks mention hollow tile. Evidence is limited to a single listing checkbox and appears possibly inconsistent across agents, so the feature is included with moderate confidence (0.75) rather than high certainty.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for 'short-term rental', 'STR', 'vacation rental', 'TVU', '30-day minimum', 'owner-occupant only', and related terms. The remarks do not address STR rules, so STR is set to false with low-medium confidence.
I searched for 'hotel rental pool', 'hotel program', 'managed by', 'rental pool', and specific hotel brands. There is no evidence of hotel rental pool participation; because STR is not shown as allowed, this is false.
I searched for 'mandatory hotel pool', 'required to participate', 'must be in rental program', and similar phrases. The remarks include no such language and STR is not indicated as allowed, so mandatory participation is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for phrases like 'lease expires', 'land lease to', 'leasehold expiring in', or specific years indicating lease expiry. The remarks contain no reference to land tenure or a lease expiry year, so this remains unknown (null).
I searched the remarks for 'VA', 'VA approved', 'VA financing', and related phrases. There is no evidence in the provided remarks that the building is VA-approved, so set to false with low-medium confidence.
The public remarks do not state that the HOA carries full 'walls-in' or comprehensive building insurance. With no explicit statement in the listings, this is set to false with moderate confidence.
No analysis available
The remarks do not indicate that the building passed a fire/life safety evaluation or similar certification. In absence of any mention, the field is set to false with moderate confidence (absence often indicates no claim was made publicly).
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
At least 2 of the 3 listing remark sections explicitly mention mountain views: phrases include 'Mountain views' and 'lanai view of the Manoa mountains.' This is consistent across multiple agent remarks (likely describing the same building), so despite MLS checkbox data showing none, there is strong explicit evidence that the building offers mountain views.
No analysis available
None of the three public-remark sections reference city, downtown, or cityscape views. With no MLS CITY flags and no remarks indicating city views, there is high confidence that the building does not advertise city views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All three current listings list RESMAN in the amenities (3/3). However, none of the public remarks mention 'resident manager', 'on-site manager', or similar phrases, suggesting the checkbox may be a copy/paste action by agents. Evidence is consistent across listings but lacks explicit remarks or third-party confirmation, so inclusion is moderate-confidence (0.75).
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.