Park Lane

No analysis available

I looked for owner-occupancy indicators such as '80% owner occupied,' 'majority owner occupied,' or similar descriptions. The remarks mention original owners, owner retreats, and never-occupied units, but those are unit-specific and do not provide a building-wide owner occupancy rate.

I searched the public remarks for phrases like '4 elevators,' 'two elevators,' and 'multiple elevators,' but found no actual count. The listings only mention elevator access, being near the elevator, or private elevator access to Ala Moana Center, which does not establish the number of elevators.

Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.

ACCEN appears on only 7 of 20 current MLS listings and public remarks lack any statement that central air conditioning is included in maintenance fees. Given the low/new MLS presence and absence of remarks across listings (majority unchecked), central AC being included in fees is unlikely.

Cable TV inclusion is strongly supported at the building level. Current MLS data shows 18 of 20 listings marked CABTV, which is high-confidence evidence even though the remarks do not usually spell out cable service directly. The repeated amenity-heavy descriptions across many listings suggest the MLS checkbox is being used consistently rather than as a one-off agent error.

Common-area electricity is supported, but less directly than the other features. Sixteen of twenty listings mark OTCOEX in association_fee_includes, and the public remarks consistently emphasize extensive shared amenities and building services, which is compatible with common electric costs being paid through the association. The evidence is moderate because the remarks do not explicitly say 'common area electricity' or equivalent wording.

No analysis available

No analysis available

Gas inclusion is well supported by both MLS and remarks. Thirteen of twenty listings currently mark GAS, and multiple listings mention gas cooktops, gas grills, or built-in BBQs on lanais, including phrases like 'gas cooktop,' 'built-in gas BBQ,' and 'Wolf 5 burner gas cook top.' The repeated mention across many agents looks consistent rather than accidental copy-paste noise.

9 of 20 current MLS listings include HOTWAT in association_fee_includes, but none of the public remarks explicitly state 'hot water included.' Three listings reference WTRHTR in inclusions (suggesting some units have water heaters). Overall evidence is mixed and implied across multiple MLS records, so fee_inc_hot_water is likely offered but not universally confirmed in remarks.

Internet service is strongly supported at the building level. Eighteen of twenty current listings include INTSER, and one remark explicitly states 'wifi available,' which is direct corroboration. The combination of high MLS frequency and at least one explicit public mention makes this a high-confidence feature.

No analysis available

10 of 20 current MLS listings mark sewer (SEWER) as included in association fees. Public remarks do not explicitly reference sewer charges; the inclusion is supported moderately by MLS data but not directly confirmed in unit descriptions.

10 of 20 MLS listings indicate water is included in association fees. Although the public remarks do not explicitly say 'water included,' the MLS checkbox frequency provides moderate evidence that water is bundled with maintenance fees for some or all units.

Overwhelming evidence supports BBQ/grilling facilities. Listings mention “built-in Wolf BBQ,” “built-in gas BBQ,” “gas barbecue,” “BBQ cabanas,” and “multiple reserve-able BBQ pavilions.” The feature appears repeatedly across many remarks, suggesting a shared building amenity rather than isolated unit-only equipment.

No analysis available

No analysis available

No analysis available

Dozens of detailed listings enumerate amenities but never mention a separate 'clubhouse' or community center, even while highlighting many other shared spaces. The sparse and inconsistent MLS tagging (5/20) suggests agents occasionally mis-used the clubhouse checkbox, so this feature is treated as not present.

Concierge service is strongly supported at the building level. Numerous current listings explicitly reference "concierge services," "full-service front desk," "24-hour concierge," and "concierge support," alongside valet/bell service and hotel-style hospitality. The evidence is consistent across many agents and matches the historical MLS pattern, so this appears to be a true shared building amenity rather than a copy-paste error.

Clear evidence supports a dog park/pet area. Numerous remarks directly reference a 'dog park' or 'gated dog park', and the amenity is checked in most current listings. This is strong building-level evidence.

There is moderate-to-strong evidence of doorman/lobby attendant service. Several listings mention a "dedicated front desk," "bell/valet services," or a "front desk" alongside concierge and residential staff, which supports a staffed lobby presence even if the term "doorman" is not used consistently. Because the historical checkbox rate is only 7/20, this is stronger as implied evidence than as an explicit universal amenity.

Very strong evidence supports an exercise room/fitness center. Multiple listings explicitly say “fitness center,” “gym,” “fitness room,” “rejuvenation spa/fitness facilities,” and “state-of-the-art fitness center.” This appears consistent across many agents and is not just a one-off copy-paste issue.

No analysis available

Strong evidence indicates a meeting/conference-type room is available. One listing explicitly says “meeting room,” and other remarks mention “event rooms,” “private dining room,” “dining/party room,” and similar gathering spaces. The high frequency across listings suggests this is a real common-area amenity.

Strong building-level evidence that Park Lane offers patio/deck-type outdoor spaces. Across the provided remarks, well over a dozen listings mention a lanai, patio, or covered outdoor space, with phrases like 'covered lanai,' 'large private lanai,' 'spacious patio,' and 'vast outdoor living lanai.' The consistency across multiple agents suggests this is not a copy-paste error.

Evidence suggests a walking/jogging path or comparable path amenity. The remarks do not often use the exact phrase 'jogging path', but they repeatedly describe the Park Lane walk-way and landscaped grounds in a way that matches the amenity. Confidence is good but slightly lower because the wording is mostly implied.

No analysis available

No analysis available

No analysis available

The building appears to offer a recreation area or amenity space. Remarks mention the “Great Lawn green space,” “amenity deck,” “lush landscaped grounds,” “gorgeous grounds,” and “tropical landscaping.” The amenity is described in multiple listings and seems to be a shared outdoor recreation zone.

There is solid evidence for a recreation-room-like amenity. While the exact phrase “recreation room” is uncommon, remarks reference “club lounge,” “owners lounge,” “dining/party room,” “events rooms,” and “private dining” spaces that function as shared recreation/entertainment areas. This aligns with the MLS history showing the amenity in many listings.

No analysis available

No analysis available

Extremely strong evidence supports a sauna. The feature is present in all current MLS listings and several remarks explicitly mention 'sauna' or paired spa/steam-room facilities. This is one of the most consistent amenities in the dataset.

Storage is clearly a building feature at Park Lane, with many listings mentioning it in unit remarks and several describing deeded or included storage rooms/lockers. At least 20+ remarks reference storage in some form, including phrases like "comes with 1 good size storage room," "deeded storage locker," "large storage room," and "two dedicated storage units." The evidence is strong and repeated across multiple agents, suggesting this is not just copy-paste checkbox noise.

No analysis available

No analysis available

The building very likely has a trash chute system based on the MLS data, which is nearly unanimous. Public remarks do not usually mention trash chutes, so the absence of wording is not meaningful here. Given the 19/20 amenity history, this should be treated as a confirmed building feature.

Very strong evidence that the building offers valet service. Multiple remarks independently state 'valet,' 'valet service,' 'bell/valet services,' and 'valet parking,' and the current MLS data already shows VALET in 17/20 listings. The repeated mentions across many listings make this a high-confidence building amenity.

No analysis available

Very strong evidence that the building has a whirlpool/hot tub/spa. Multiple listings use explicit terms like 'hot tub', 'Jacuzzi', and 'whirlpool spa', and the MLS checkbox is checked in most listings. This is consistent and well corroborated.

Strong building-level evidence confirms a swimming pool. Historical MLS data is unanimous (20/20 listings), and current remarks mention it in many listings, often with resort-style wording such as "pool," "lap pool," "tropical pool," and "resort-style pools." The consistency across multiple agents indicates this is not a copy-paste error.

Evidence strongly supports that the building's pool is heated. Historical MLS data shows 13/20 listings with HEAPOO, and current remarks include explicit phrases like "heated pool" plus multiple references to pool/whirlpool spa combinations. The repeated mentions across listings suggest a real amenity rather than agent checkbox noise.

No analysis available

In-unit laundry is strongly supported across the listings. Multiple remarks explicitly mention a “walk-in laundry room” with a washer and dryer, plus others note a “new washer” and “new dryer,” while current MLS data shows 20/20 listings with washer/dryer inclusions. The evidence is consistent across many listings and agents, so confidence is very high.

No analysis available

No analysis available

No analysis available

No analysis available

Assigned/reserved parking is strongly supported across the building. Multiple listings explicitly reference “assigned tandem cov’d parking,” “deeded parking stalls,” “side-by-side parking,” and private garages, with 18/20 MLS records already checking assigned parking. The remarks are consistent across many agents and unit types, so this feature should remain included.

Covered parking is strongly supported by both MLS data and listing remarks. Across the remarks, agents describe “covered parking stall,” “private attached garage,” “private enclosed garage,” and garage-level parking access, matching the 19/20 covered parking indicators in MLS. The evidence is broad and consistent, not limited to a single listing or agent.

The remarks repeatedly describe parking stalls as deeded, included, or attached with the unit. This strongly supports that parking is deeded/owned with the condo.

No analysis available

I searched the remarks for explicit parking cost language, including monthly parking fees, additional parking charges, or rental terms. The listings mention parking stalls, assigned parking, deeded parking, and valet, but no monthly parking fee is stated.

Guest parking is not as explicitly described as other parking features, but the evidence still leans positive. Multiple listings mention 'guest suites,' valet/bell services, concierge, and hotel-like operations, which commonly accompany visitor parking in this building. While fewer listings explicitly say 'guest parking,' the building context supports it.

Secured entry parking/access is strongly supported. Remarks across many listings mention '24/7 security,' 'secure condominium setting,' 'secured direct elevator access,' and valet/controlled-access living, all consistent with secure parking or secure building access. The feature appears repeatedly and independently across listings.

Tandem parking is clearly present in the building. Several listings explicitly state 'assigned tandem cov’d parking for 2-cars' and similar tandem arrangements, while others mention side-by-side or private garages, showing the building offers multiple parking configurations. The tandem references are explicit enough to treat this as a true building feature.

No analysis available

I looked for references to a parking waitlist, parking waiting list, or instructions to join a parking waitlist. The remarks discuss available stalls, deeded parking, and valet access, but do not mention any parking waitlist process.

No analysis available

No analysis available

Strong building-level evidence for on-site security. Multiple current remarks explicitly mention "24/7 security," "24 hour security," and a "secure condominium setting," consistent with the historical MLS data showing 17/20 listings checked for security guard service. The repeated wording across many listings suggests this is a real building amenity rather than a copy-paste error.

Many listings emphasize on-site staffed security, e.g., “24-hour security,” “24-hr security,” “24/7 security,” and mention concierge/valet services typical of patrolled luxury properties. Historical data already indicated medium confidence for a security patrol presence here.

No analysis available

Central AC is strongly supported for this building. The current MLS data shows 20 of 20 listings with ACCEN/CENAC in unit features and 19 of 20 with ACCEN in inclusions, which is consistent across many listings and likely not a copy-paste error. Public remarks do not explicitly mention HVAC, but there is no evidence suggesting the feature was removed.

No analysis available

No analysis available

Concrete is supported by the MLS across all 20 current listings (20/20 with CONCRE). The public remarks do not explicitly mention concrete construction, but there is no conflicting evidence, and the building-wide MLS pattern strongly indicates this feature. This looks like a consistent building characteristic rather than a copy-paste anomaly.

Double wall construction is supported by the MLS in 15 of 20 current listings, which is strong evidence for a building-level feature. Public remarks do not explicitly describe the walls, but the repeated checks across multiple listings make this credible. This appears more like consistent building data than an isolated agent error.

No analysis available

Only 5 of 20 current MLS listings include 'masonry and stucco' in construction_materials (5/20). None of the public remarks reference 'masonry', 'stucco' or similar wording, and most listings (15/20) do not list MASSTU — suggesting the minority checkbox entries are likely agent inconsistencies rather than a building-level masonry/stucco construction feature.

Steel frame is checked in 11 of 20 current MLS listings, suggesting multiple agents recognize it as part of the building construction. The remarks are silent on the structure, so the evidence is moderate rather than explicit. This could reflect standard MLS input that is consistent across part of the inventory.

No analysis available

No analysis available

No analysis available

Above-ground construction appears in 8 of 20 current MLS listings, so there is some building-level support for the feature. None of the public remarks explicitly mention it, which keeps the confidence below the stronger features. The MLS pattern is enough to include it, but it may partly reflect inconsistent agent input.

No analysis available

No analysis available

I searched the remarks for explicit short-term rental permission language such as "STR allowed," "vacation rental allowed," "NUC," or "TVU," and found none. There is also no hotel-pool or other language suggesting short-term rentals are permitted, so the building appears not to allow STR based on public remarks.

I looked for hotel pool references such as 'hotel rental pool', 'hotel program', or hotel-managed unit participation and found none. Because STR is not established as allowed in the remarks, this must be false.

I searched for language indicating a required hotel pool or mandatory rental participation and found nothing. There is also no evidence of STR being allowed, so mandatory pool participation is not supported.

No analysis available

No analysis available

I looked for leasehold wording such as "lease expires," "ground lease ends," "leasehold expiring," or any 4-digit expiration year. Nothing in the remarks indicates a leasehold tenure or a lease expiry date, so the year remains unknown.

I searched the public remarks for any VA-specific financing language such as "VA approved" or "VA loans accepted" and found none. Based on the remarks alone, there is no evidence that this building is VA loan approved.

I searched the remarks for HOA insurance language including fully insured, full insurance, comprehensive building insurance, and walls-in coverage. The listings discuss luxury amenities, services, and security, but they do not mention insurance coverage for the building.

Fire sprinkler system is strongly supported by the MLS data: 19 of 20 current listings include the FIRSPR amenity. None of the public remarks explicitly mention sprinklers or fire suppression, so the evidence appears to come from the MLS amenities field rather than copy-pasted remarks, but the near-unanimous current signal is strong enough to include.

I looked for explicit fire/life safety language such as FLSE passed, fire safety certified, life safety compliant, or passed fire inspection. None of the public remarks included any such statement, so there is no evidence here that the building passed a fire/life safety evaluation.

Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.

No analysis available

Ocean views are strongly supported across the remarks, with many listings saying things like “ocean views,” “Pacific Ocean views,” “direct ocean views,” and “breathtaking views of the Pacific Ocean.” This aligns with the current MLS pattern showing 18/20 listings with OCEAN in the view description, so this appears to be a stable building-level feature rather than copy-paste noise.

No analysis available

Diamond Head views are mentioned in the public remarks, including an explicit reference to “Diamond Head and the Waikiki skyline.” The MLS data shows fewer occurrences than ocean or coastline views (3/20), suggesting this is an available but less common orientation in the building.

City views are supported by multiple remarks referring to the “Waikiki skyline” and “Waikiki city views,” plus current MLS data showing 9/20 listings with CITY in the view descriptions. The evidence suggests this is a real but not universal view type in the building.

Coastline/shoreline views are well documented in the remarks, including references to “sandy beach,” “white crescent beach,” “rolling waves,” and views over Ala Moana Beach Park. The MLS data is also strong at 11/20 listings with COASTL, indicating this is a common and credible feature in the building.

Garden/landscaped views appear to be a real building feature, with 7 of 20 current listings showing GARDEN in MLS view descriptions and no listings indicating NONE. Multiple remarks from different agents describe similar greenery-focused outlooks, including "lush greenery of the park," "verdant Park vistas," and "lush, tropical landscaping," suggesting this is not just copy-paste MLS noise.

No analysis available

No analysis available

One 4th‑floor Island Residence is marketed as an “east-facing” corner with sweeping views of the ocean, harbor, and Waikiki skyline, which strongly implies morning sun/sunrise exposure. While agents tend to highlight sunset views in other listings, the documented east-facing stack suggests the building does offer sunrise‑oriented units, so sunrise views are available to some buyers.

Sunset views are clearly supported across several remarks, including phrases like “breathtaking Hawaiian sunsets,” “stunning sunset views over the ocean,” and “the tranquil ocean sunset view.” With 9/20 listings showing SUNSET in current MLS data, this appears to be a consistent building feature for some units.

No analysis available

No analysis available

No analysis available

No analysis available

Resident manager is supported by the current MLS amenities data across 17 of 20 listings. The public remarks do not explicitly say “resident manager,” “on-site manager,” or similar, but the repeated MLS RESMAN flag indicates this is likely a consistent building feature rather than a one-off agent copy. No remarks contradict the amenity, so it should be retained.

No analysis available

No analysis available