Palm Villas 2-Dd
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Palm Villas 2-Dd
Building Overview
Palm Villas 2-Dd in Ewa — wood-frame building (1991) with pool and resident manager. Window AC; no short-term rentals.
About Palm Villas 2-Dd
Based on MLS data, Palm Villas 2-Dd is located in the Ewa neighborhood and was built in 1991. The building is constructed with a wood frame. Unit square footage and other size details are not provided in the available MLS records.
According to available records, on-site amenities include a pool, a BBQ area, and a resident manager. Air conditioning is listed as window units. Short-term rentals are not allowed.
Parking options noted in the MLS include covered, assigned, and guest parking. Pets are not allowed. The management company is listed as unknown in MLS data. Buyers should verify all building facts, rules, fees, and availability with the listing agent or managing entity, as this summary is based solely on MLS-derived information.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Three separate listings all show OTCOEX in the association fee includes, which typically covers common area utilities like hallway and amenity electricity. Although no remarks explicitly mention 'common area electricity', the consistent MLS coding across all listings suggests common expenses are included rather than agent error or a one-off entry.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across all three listings, the HOTWAT code is absent while WTRHTR (water heater) appears consistently in the inclusions. This pattern matches the expectation that units provide their own hot water, so building-supplied hot water is not part of the HOA/maintenance fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
One listing’s remarks explicitly describe a 'community pool, bbq, and recreation area,' confirming a shared BBQ amenity. Additionally, 2 of 3 current MLS listings have BBQ checked in the amenities, suggesting this is not a one-off error. Although not every agent mentions it in remarks, the direct description and checkbox pattern strongly support that the building offers BBQ facilities.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
A listing explicitly notes a 'community pool, bbq, and recreation area,' directly matching the recreation_area feature definition and confirming a shared rec space. While only 1 of 3 MLS entries has the RECARE box checked, the detailed remark provides solid, non–copy-paste evidence that the building includes a recreation area. The lack of mention in other remarks likely reflects agent omission rather than absence of the amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Out of three recent listings, one explicitly mentions a 'storage closet' with the unit, and one shows STORAG selected in unit_features. This provides direct evidence that at least some units in the building offer extra storage space, even if it is not a shared building amenity. The other listings do not mention storage, but there is no conflicting evidence, so the building is treated as offering storage for some units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence strongly supports that the building has a shared community pool. One listing explicitly mentions a 'community pool, bbq, and recreation area,' and all 3 of 3 current MLS entries have pool-related amenities checked, suggesting consistent agent reporting rather than an error. No listings contradict the existence of a pool.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Two of the three listings explicitly mention in-unit laundry, including phrases like 'Washer dryer located inside unit' and references to new washer and dryer installations. All 3/3 MLS entries include washer/dryer in their inclusions, which supports that units in this building commonly have in-unit laundry. Even if not every unit is confirmed, buyers searching for buildings with in-unit laundry would reasonably consider this property.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Assigned parking is clearly indicated by MLS data for all three listings and is explicitly confirmed in remarks noting 'two assigned parking stalls.' Evidence is consistent across multiple listings and aligns with typical condo parking arrangements in this type of community.
Remarks specifically reference 'covered ... parking stalls,' showing that at least some stalls are covered. This is supported by MLS checkbox data on covered/garage parking for one listing, indicating the building offers covered parking options.
Looked for terms such as deeded parking, owned stall, or parking included in deed; only assigned stalls are mentioned. In the absence of explicit language about ownership, deeded parking is assumed not confirmed.
No analysis available
Searched for parking fees or monthly parking charges but found no references. Whether any separate parking fee is charged is unknown from the remarks.
Guest parking is consistently marked in the MLS for every listing reviewed, suggesting the building provides visitor parking. While not described in remarks, the uniform MLS data across multiple listings points to guest parking being available.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Checked for mentions of a parking waitlist or needing to join a list for stalls; none were found. This suggests there is likely no formal parking waitlist, but it is not explicitly confirmed.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
MLS inclusions indicate window A/C (ACWIUN) in 2 of 3 current listings, suggesting that some units in the building have window A/C units. Public remarks do not explicitly mention window A/C, but they also do not contradict the checkbox data. Given multiple agents marking this feature, it is likely that window units are present or permitted in at least some units.
No analysis available
Double-wall construction (DOUWAL) appears in the construction_materials for all three current listings for this building. The consistency across all active listings, without any contradictory remarks or data, provides strong evidence that the building has double-wall construction.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
One of three current listings explicitly tags construction as wood frame (WOOFRA), and the others do not specify any alternative material. Construction types are rarely mentioned in remarks, and there is no evidence of concrete or other non-wood framing, so it is reasonable to infer the building is wood-frame with moderate confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Looked for terms like short-term rental, vacation rental, NUC, TVU, or 30-day minimum but found no indications either way. Given the conventional residential tone and lack of STR language, STRs are assumed not allowed by default from remarks alone.
Searched for hotel rental pool, hotel program, or branding by a hotel operator; none were present. Combined with the residential context and inferred lack of STRs, a hotel pool program is effectively ruled out.
Checked for language like mandatory hotel pool, required rental program participation, or inability to opt out; found none. With no evidence of any rental pool and no STR focus, mandatory participation can be safely treated as not present.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched for phrases like leasehold, ground lease, and "lease expires" with a year, but found none. The land lease expiry year cannot be determined from the available remarks.
Remarks explicitly mention a VA assumable loan, so the building is very likely VA approved. No broader statement like "VA approved building" appears, but the presence of an active VA loan is strong indirect evidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across three recent listings, none describe a garden or courtyard view, and MLS view data shows 0/3 with garden-related tags while 1/3 is explicitly marked as NONE. Remarks instead emphasize features like a "private gated yard/patio" and "huge lanai" without tying them to any specific landscaped or garden outlook. Given the consistent absence of garden-view language in both structured view fields and remarks, this building is not treated as offering garden views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Two of the three current listings for this building have the RESMAN (resident manager) amenity checked in the MLS, and none of the remarks contradict the presence of an on-site manager. Although no listing text explicitly mentions a resident or on-site building manager, this is a common omission in marketing remarks for such a feature. Given the majority pattern in current MLS data and lack of opposing evidence, the building is likely to have a resident/on-site manager, but confidence remains moderate since support comes only from checkboxes.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.