Palm Villas 2
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Palm Villas 2
Building Overview
Palm Villas 2 in Ewa offers a pool and sunset views. Built 1991, wood-frame construction.
About Palm Villas 2
Palm Villas 2 is a residential building located in the Ewa neighborhood. According to available records, the building was built in 1991 and is wood-frame construction. Size and unit-mix details are not provided in the MLS data.
Based on MLS data, key features include a community pool, BBQ area, a resident manager, and sunset views. Units use window air conditioning according to the listing information.
Additional details from MLS: parking is available and includes covered, assigned stalls plus guest parking. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed. The management company is listed as unknown in the available records. This summary is based on MLS data; buyers should verify all building details, rules, and fees with the listing agent or management before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for explicit owner-occupancy percentages and descriptive wording about the resident mix, but found no relevant statements. Because no current value was provided and the listings do not address owner occupancy, the percentage cannot be determined from these remarks.
I searched the public remarks for any explicit elevator references or a numeric elevator count and found none. Since no current value was provided and the listings do not mention elevators, the building's elevator count remains unknown from these remarks.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Common-area electricity is strongly supported by the MLS data: 17 of 20 current listings include OTCOEX in association fees. The public remarks do not explicitly spell it out, but they repeatedly reference shared amenities and the pattern is consistent across many listings, suggesting this is not a one-off checkbox error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Hot water is not supported as an included maintenance-fee item. Across the remarks, the water-heating references are consistently unit-level heaters rather than building-supplied hot water, and the MLS pattern shows 0 of 20 listings with HOTWAT while 13 of 20 list WTRHTR. This is strong, repeated evidence across multiple listings and agents, not a copy-paste artifact.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer appears to be included at the building level. While the public remarks do not explicitly mention sewer, the MLS association fee data is strong with 15 of 20 listings checking SEWER. This looks like a consistent building-level fee item rather than copy-paste noise.
Water is strongly supported as included in the maintenance fee. The MLS data shows 16 of 20 listings with WATER checked, and the public remarks are silent on any change or exception. That level of consistency suggests a stable building-level inclusion.
BBQ is strongly supported for this building. Historical MLS data shows BBQ in 14 of 20 listings, and current remarks repeatedly confirm shared BBQ amenities across multiple listings. The wording is consistent across different agents, which suggests a real building-level amenity rather than a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Clubhouse/community center support is moderate but real. At least one remark explicitly says "clubhouse," and another says "community center," alongside a recreation area, which aligns with the historical MLS data showing club_house in 7 of 20 listings. This appears to be a shared amenity offered at the building/community level rather than a unit-specific feature.
No analysis available
Dog park is supported by at least one clear current remark: "Additional community amenities include parks, playgrounds, a dog park, and a recreation center." Although the MLS checkbox appears only once, the remark is explicit and describes a community-wide amenity, so it should be included for buyers searching for pet amenities.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Patio/deck-style outdoor space is strongly supported across the listings. Dozens of remarks mention a "covered lanai," "private lanai," "outdoor lanai/patio," "private balcony," or "fenced patio"—including several ground-floor units with private outdoor areas and upstairs units with lanais. The evidence is repeated across multiple agents and reads like genuine building-level amenity availability, not a one-off copy-paste error.
The feature is supported by at least one listing mentioning "many long walking pathways right outside your doorstep." While the exact phrase "jogging path" is not used, the walking-path language is close enough to indicate a shared path amenity available to residents.
No analysis available
Private yard/private outdoor space is strongly supported. Multiple listings explicitly mention a "private fenced-in yard," "private concrete patio yard," "large fenced back patio oasis," "enclosed yard," and "ground floor unit with a private yard." The evidence appears across many remarks and multiple agents, confirming that some units in Palm Villas / Palm Villas II offer private or enclosed yard space.
No analysis available
This feature is strongly supported: many listings explicitly mention a "recreation area," "rec area," "recreation space," or "recreation center." The wording appears across multiple agents rather than a single copy-paste source, so this is consistent building-level amenity evidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage is supported by both MLS history and current listing remarks. Across the provided remarks, several listings explicitly mention storage-related features such as 'huge attic space,' 'extra storage,' 'additional storage,' and 'Ample storage,' suggesting this is a real building/unit-level feature rather than a copy-paste checkbox error. The evidence appears consistent across multiple agents and listings.
I searched for surfboard storage-related wording such as "surfboard storage," "board storage," or "bike and surfboard storage." The remarks do not mention any storage amenity specifically for surfboards.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Pool is strongly supported as a building/community amenity. It is mentioned in many current listings across multiple agents, with phrases like "community pool," "newly renovated pool," "heated community pool," and "secured pool." The repeated mentions across remarks suggest this is a real shared feature rather than a copy-paste checkbox error.
No analysis available
I searched for terms like saltwater pool, salt pool, or saline pool. The pool is described as renovated, secured, heated, fenced, or community-based, but not as salt water.
In-unit laundry is strongly supported across the listing set: many remarks explicitly say "in-unit washer and dryer," "stack washer/dryer," "full-size washer and dryer," or note washer/dryer as included. The historical MLS data also shows washer/dryer in inclusions for 17 of 20 listings, so this feature appears to be a consistent building offering confirmed by multiple agents.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit paid-laundry language such as coin-op, card-operated, quarters, or laundry fee references. The remarks mention in-unit washer/dryer and do not indicate any paid community laundry facility.
I searched the public remarks for phrases like "laundry on each floor," "laundry room on every floor," and similar wording. The remarks only mention in-unit washer/dryer and appliance upgrades, which do not support community laundry on every floor.
Parking is strongly supported across the remarks, with dozens of listings referencing parking stalls or spaces. Examples include “two full size parking stalls,” “2 parking stalls,” and “one covered and one open/uncovered.” The pattern is consistent across multiple agents and appears to be building-level, not unit-specific.
Assigned parking is clearly supported by both the MLS checkbox data and the public remarks. Many listings explicitly mention “two assigned parking stalls,” “1 assigned parking stall,” or similar language. This is repeated often enough across listings to treat as a stable building feature.
Covered parking is strongly evidenced across the listings. Multiple remarks explicitly reference covered stalls or mixed covered/open parking, such as “one covered stall and one open stall” and “2 assigned covered parking stalls.” The consistency across many agents makes this high confidence.
I looked for explicit wording like deeded parking, owned stall, parking included in the deed, or parking included with title. The remarks consistently mention assigned, covered, open, or guest stalls, but do not say the parking is deeded.
No analysis available
I searched for monthly parking charge, parking rental, additional parking cost, or similar fee language. The listings describe stall counts and types, but no public remarks state any parking fee.
Guest parking appears to be a recurring building feature, supported by both MLS data and many remarks. Listings repeatedly use phrases like “ample guest parking,” “plenty of guest parking,” and “guest parking available for visitors.” The evidence is consistent across multiple listings and agents.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for references to a parking waitlist, waiting list, or instructions to join one. The remarks mention ample guest parking and assigned stalls, but nothing indicates a parking waitlist system.
No analysis available
The remarks provide direct evidence of electronic access security through the phrase 'fob-secured community pool.' That is strong public-remarks support for card/fob-based security access in the building or its amenities.
No analysis available
I looked for references to security patrol, patrolled building, or roving security. The remarks mention a resident manager and secured pool/amenities, but that is not the same as a security patrol service.
No analysis available
No evidence of building-wide central air: 0/20 listings have central AC checkbox checked and only 1 remark mentions 'central A/C in the living room' while many listings (multiple agents) explicitly state 'window ACs', 'new AC units', 'in-wall ac units', or 'split A/C'. The preponderance of remarks across listings indicates unit-level AC rather than a centralized HVAC system, and MLS fields do not show central AC—therefore central_ac is set to false with high confidence.
Although the MLS inclusion for ACSPL was low historically (1/20), at least four separate remarks explicitly reference split or in-wall AC (quotes include “newly installed, large split A/C unit” and “new in-wall ac units”), and many additional listings mention new AC units or AC in every room. Evidence comes from multiple listings/agents describing mini-split/in-wall installs rather than a single copy-paste checkbox, so buyers searching for split/ductless systems should consider this building.
Strong, repeated evidence across many listings confirms AC is available in the building, including multiple explicit mentions of "window AC," "window air conditioner," "AC units in every room," and "new AC units." This appears to be consistent across different agents and listings, not a one-off copy-paste note.
Three of 20 current MLS records include the CONCRE (concrete) construction flag, while none of the public remarks explicitly mention concrete phrases. Evidence is limited to MLS checkbox data (possible agent checkbox usage) and is not corroborated in agent remarks, so presence is plausible for some units but not strongly confirmed across listings.
Double-wall construction is strongly supported by the MLS history, with 15 of 20 current listings carrying the DOUWAL code. Public remarks do not explicitly mention "double wall" or "two walls," but the consistency across many listings suggests this is a real building-level feature rather than a one-off copy/paste error.
No analysis available
Eight of 20 current MLS records list MASSTU (masonry/stucco) and prior confidence was Medium. The public remarks for these listings contain no direct phrasing like 'masonry' or 'stucco', so the feature is included based on several MLS flags but lacks explicit corroborating language in agent remarks.
Only 1 of 20 current listings include STEFRA in construction_materials and none of the public remarks mention 'steel frame' or similar phrasing. With so few MLS checkboxes and no confirming agent remarks, there is weak/implied evidence for steel-frame construction; this likely reflects inconsistent checkbox usage rather than a confirmed building feature.
Four of 20 MLS listings include the SLAB (concrete slab foundation) flag, but none of the public remarks explicitly reference a concrete slab foundation. The evidence comes solely from MLS checkbox data, so slab construction is possible for some units but not confirmed in agent remarks.
No analysis available
Wood-frame construction appears in the current MLS data on 10 of 20 listings. None of the public remarks explicitly say "wood frame" or "wood frame construction," so the evidence is moderate and may reflect MLS checkbox usage rather than repeated agent descriptions.
Five of 20 MLS records flag ABOGRO (above-ground construction). Public remarks frequently reference 'ground-floor' unit locations (e.g., 'ground floor corner unit'), but they do not explicitly describe above-ground construction materials, so above-ground construction is possible for some units though not strongly documented in remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for short-term rental indicators such as STR allowed, vacation rental, NUC, TVU, or legal short-term rental language, as well as any minimum-stay rules. None of the remarks mention short-term rentals being allowed, so there is no evidence here to support STR permission.
I looked for hotel rental pool references such as Hilton/Trump/Ritz pool, hotel-managed operations, or participation in a rental program. None are present, and since STR is not established from the remarks, this must be false.
I searched for mandatory pool language like required participation, cannot opt out, or owner-must-rent terms. The remarks contain nothing like that, so there is no evidence of a mandatory rental pool.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the public remarks for leasehold language such as lease expiry year, ground lease ends, renewed through, or extended lease dates. None of the listings mention a land lease or any expiration year, so the lease expiry remains unknown from these remarks.
The public remarks repeatedly advertise VA assumable financing, which is strong evidence that VA-related financing is supported in this building/listings. I did not need to infer this from context; it is stated directly in several listings.
The remarks explicitly state '100% Hurricane Insured,' which strongly supports that the building/HOA carries full coverage. This is direct public-remarks evidence and overrides the prior uncertainty.
No analysis available
I looked for language such as FLSE passed, fire/life safety evaluation passed, fire safety certified, or passed fire inspection and found nothing. With no explicit mention in the public remarks and no current verified value provided, this is treated as not evidenced in the listings.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Historically the building had high confidence for garden views and current MLS shows 4 of 20 listings with GARDEN in view_descriptions. Public remarks include landscaping references across multiple ads and one listing explicitly notes "garden views from your front-facing lanai," supporting that some units offer garden/courtyard views rather than this being a universal feature or agent copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sunset views are supported and remain credible for this building. Current remarks include at least 1 explicit reference to "sunset views," and the historical record already had multiple listings pointing to the same feature. The evidence looks consistent across listings rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
No analysis available
I searched for wording like "fireworks view," "watch fireworks from lanai," or "see fireworks from the unit." The remarks discuss beaches, sunsets, and general views, but nothing that confirms a fireworks view from the building.
No analysis available
Strong evidence supports a resident manager on-site. Multiple current remarks explicitly mention "on-site resident manager" and the "site manager’s office," which aligns with the historical MLS RESMAN flag. This does not look like a one-off copy-paste error; the feature appears consistently across several listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.