Palm Villas 2
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Palm Villas 2
Building Overview
Palm Villas 2 in Ewa offers a pool and sunset views. Built 1991, wood-frame construction.
About Palm Villas 2
Palm Villas 2 is a residential building located in the Ewa neighborhood. According to available records, the building was built in 1991 and is wood-frame construction. Size and unit-mix details are not provided in the MLS data.
Based on MLS data, key features include a community pool, BBQ area, a resident manager, and sunset views. Units use window air conditioning according to the listing information.
Additional details from MLS: parking is available and includes covered, assigned stalls plus guest parking. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed. The management company is listed as unknown in the available records. This summary is based on MLS data; buyers should verify all building details, rules, and fees with the listing agent or management before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for explicit owner-occupancy percentages and qualitative descriptions of the resident mix, but found none. Since owner occupancy is only reliably determined from remarks, there is not enough evidence to assign a percentage.
I searched the public remarks for explicit references such as 'elevator,' 'multiple elevators,' or a stated count like '4 elevators,' and found none. Given the townhouse/ground-floor walk-up style described throughout, the absence of elevator language suggests the building likely does not have elevators, but this is still based on no direct remark evidence.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Common-area electricity appears to be included at the building level. This is strongly supported by MLS data, with 17 of 20 current listings showing OTCOEX checked. The public remarks do not spell it out, but the repeated MLS pattern suggests this is a shared building expense rather than a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Hot water is not supported as an included maintenance-fee item. Across the remarks, the water-heating references are consistently unit-level heaters rather than building-supplied hot water, and the MLS pattern shows 0 of 20 listings with HOTWAT while 13 of 20 list WTRHTR. This is strong, repeated evidence across multiple listings and agents, not a copy-paste artifact.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer appears to be included in the maintenance/association fee at this building. The current MLS data is strong, with 15 of 20 listings checking SEWER. Public remarks do not mention it explicitly, but the repeated checkbox pattern across listings supports inclusion.
Water is strongly supported as included in the maintenance fee. The MLS data shows 15 of 20 current listings with WATER checked, which is strong enough to rely on despite the lack of explicit mention in remarks. This looks like a consistent building-level inclusion rather than a one-off listing entry.
BBQ is strongly supported for this building. Across the provided remarks, multiple listings explicitly mention "BBQ areas," "BBQ area," "barbeque area," and even "grilling by the pool," which is consistent with the historical MLS signal. This looks like a real shared amenity repeatedly confirmed by different agents, not a one-off copy/paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Clubhouse/community center is supported, though not as consistently as BBQ or recreation area. One listing explicitly mentions a "clubhouse" and another references a "community center," which aligns with the historical MLS amenities. The evidence is enough to include it, but it appears less frequently and may be described inconsistently by agents.
No analysis available
Dog park is supported by at least one clear current remark: "Additional community amenities include parks, playgrounds, a dog park, and a recreation center." Although the MLS checkbox appears only once, the remark is explicit and describes a community-wide amenity, so it should be included for buyers searching for pet amenities.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Patio/deck-style outdoor space is strongly supported across the remarks: many listings mention a "private lanai," "covered lanai," "outdoor lanai/patio," "fenced patio," or "private courtyard/yard." The feature appears in well over a dozen listings and is reinforced by both current MLS amenities and repeated agent descriptions, suggesting this is a real building-wide amenity rather than a copy-paste mistake.
Jogging/walking path is implied by the remarks rather than consistently named. One listing specifically describes "many long walking pathways right outside your doorstep," which fits the feature definition, but there are no strong repeated explicit mentions of a jogging path. Confidence is moderate because the evidence is more suggestive than direct.
No analysis available
Private yard/private outdoor space is strongly supported. Multiple listings explicitly mention a "private fenced-in yard," "private concrete patio yard," "large fenced back patio oasis," "enclosed yard," and "ground floor unit with a private yard." The evidence appears across many remarks and multiple agents, confirming that some units in Palm Villas / Palm Villas II offer private or enclosed yard space.
No analysis available
Recreation area support is strong and recurring. Multiple listings mention a "recreation area," "recreation areas," or "dedicated recreation space," matching the MLS history. The repeated phrasing across different remarks suggests this is a genuine common amenity rather than a checkbox mistake.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage is supported by both MLS history and current listing remarks. Across the provided remarks, several listings explicitly mention storage-related features such as 'huge attic space,' 'extra storage,' 'additional storage,' and 'Ample storage,' suggesting this is a real building/unit-level feature rather than a copy-paste checkbox error. The evidence appears consistent across multiple agents and listings.
I searched for surfboard storage-related wording such as surfboard storage, board storage, or surf storage. The listings mention general storage, sheds, and attic space, but nothing specific to surfboard storage facilities.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The pool amenity is very strongly supported. Roughly 20+ listings mention it, with phrases like "pool," "community swimming pool," "newly renovated pool," and "heated community pool." The evidence is consistent across multiple agents and listing styles, so this appears to be a real shared building/community amenity.
No analysis available
I searched for saltwater-related pool wording such as saltwater pool, salt pool, or saline pool. The pool is described as renovated, heated, secured, and community-based, but not as salt water.
In-unit laundry is strongly supported across the listing set and remains confirmed in current remarks. Multiple listings explicitly mention 'in-unit washer and dryer,' 'stack washer/gas dryer,' 'full-size washer and dryer,' and 'washer/dryer to be installed,' indicating this is not a one-off copy-paste error. Evidence appears consistent across many agents and listing descriptions, so this feature should be included.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit paid-laundry language such as coin laundry, card-operated machines, quarters, or laundry fees. The remarks repeatedly mention in-unit washer/dryer, but they do not describe any paid community laundry facility.
I searched the remarks for phrases like "laundry on each floor," "laundry room on every floor," and similar wording. The listings mention in-unit washer/dryer in several units, but nothing about shared laundry facilities on every floor.
Parking is strongly supported by both the MLS data and the remarks. Dozens of listings mention “2 parking stalls,” “assigned parking,” “covered and uncovered,” “open parking,” or parking “just steps from the unit.” The evidence is consistent across many agents and appears to be a stable building feature.
Assigned parking is very well supported. The remarks repeatedly reference “two assigned parking stalls,” “1 assigned parking stall,” and “2 assigned parking spaces,” which aligns with the MLS checkbox data. This appears to be a genuine building feature rather than copy-paste noise.
Covered parking is clearly supported by the remarks and MLS data. Multiple listings mention “two assigned covered parking stalls,” “one covered & one uncovered,” and “one covered stall and one open stall,” showing the feature is available in the building. The pattern is consistent across many listings and agents.
I looked for explicit deeded-parking language such as deeded parking, owned stall, or parking included in deed. The remarks only say the stalls are assigned or included, which is not enough to confirm deeded parking.
No analysis available
I searched for wording like parking fee, monthly parking charge, or parking rental. The listings describe the number and type of stalls, but no fee information appears in the remarks.
Guest parking is supported by both the MLS data and numerous public remarks. Several listings say “guest parking close by,” “ample guest parking,” “plenty of guest stalls,” or “there’s also plenty of guest parking available,” indicating it is available to residents and visitors. The evidence is broad enough to treat this as a building-level feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for references to a parking waitlist or instructions to join one. Nothing like that appears, and the listings suggest parking is assigned rather than waitlisted.
No analysis available
I looked for key card, fob access, card reader, or electronic entry language. The phrase "fob-secured community pool" is direct public-remarks evidence of an electronic access security system, supporting this feature.
No analysis available
I searched for references to security patrol or roving security service. The remarks mention a resident manager and secured amenities, but nothing about patrol service or a patrolled building.
No analysis available
No evidence of building-wide central air: 0/20 listings have central AC checkbox checked and only 1 remark mentions 'central A/C in the living room' while many listings (multiple agents) explicitly state 'window ACs', 'new AC units', 'in-wall ac units', or 'split A/C'. The preponderance of remarks across listings indicates unit-level AC rather than a centralized HVAC system, and MLS fields do not show central AC—therefore central_ac is set to false with high confidence.
Although the MLS inclusion for ACSPL was low historically (1/20), at least four separate remarks explicitly reference split or in-wall AC (quotes include “newly installed, large split A/C unit” and “new in-wall ac units”), and many additional listings mention new AC units or AC in every room. Evidence comes from multiple listings/agents describing mini-split/in-wall installs rather than a single copy-paste checkbox, so buyers searching for split/ductless systems should consider this building.
This feature is strongly supported across many listings, with numerous remarks explicitly mentioning window AC or similar variants such as "window ACs," "window air conditioner," and "new in-wall ac units." The evidence appears consistent across multiple agents and listing styles, so this is not just a checkbox artifact or copy-paste issue.
Three of 20 current MLS records include the CONCRE (concrete) construction flag, while none of the public remarks explicitly mention concrete phrases. Evidence is limited to MLS checkbox data (possible agent checkbox usage) and is not corroborated in agent remarks, so presence is plausible for some units but not strongly confirmed across listings.
Double-wall construction is strongly supported by the MLS history, with 15 of 20 current listings carrying the DOUWAL code. The public remarks do not explicitly mention 'double wall,' but the high frequency across listings makes this a strong building-level feature.
No analysis available
Masonry/stucco appears in 7 of 20 current MLS records, which is only moderate evidence and not reinforced by the remarks. Because the remarks contain no direct construction descriptions, this may reflect checkbox inconsistency or copy-paste behavior rather than a clearly verified feature.
Only 1 of 20 current listings include STEFRA in construction_materials and none of the public remarks mention 'steel frame' or similar phrasing. With so few MLS checkboxes and no confirming agent remarks, there is weak/implied evidence for steel-frame construction; this likely reflects inconsistent checkbox usage rather than a confirmed building feature.
Four of 20 MLS listings include the SLAB (concrete slab foundation) flag, but none of the public remarks explicitly reference a concrete slab foundation. The evidence comes solely from MLS checkbox data, so slab construction is possible for some units but not confirmed in agent remarks.
No analysis available
Wood-frame construction is supported by the current MLS checkbox data on 10 of 20 listings. None of the public remarks explicitly mention 'wood frame' or similar wording, so this appears to be MLS-level support rather than a remark-confirmed fact.
Five of 20 MLS records flag ABOGRO (above-ground construction). Public remarks frequently reference 'ground-floor' unit locations (e.g., 'ground floor corner unit'), but they do not explicitly describe above-ground construction materials, so above-ground construction is possible for some units though not strongly documented in remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for STR indicators such as short-term rental allowed, vacation rental, NUC, TVU, or similar language. The remarks are silent on STR rights, so there is no evidence that short-term rentals are allowed.
I looked for hotel rental pool references such as Hilton/Trump/Ritz pool or hotel-managed operations. None were found, and since STR is not evidenced here, this must remain false.
I searched for mandatory participation language like must rent, cannot opt out, or required hotel pool. The remarks do not mention any such program, so this is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for leasehold-specific wording such as lease expires, ground lease ends, renewed through, or extended to a future year. Nothing in the remarks indicates a lease expiry year, so this remains unknown.
The public remarks repeatedly advertise VA assumable financing, which is strong evidence that VA-related financing is supported here. This is consistent across multiple listings, so confidence is very high.
This is direct public-remark evidence that the building/HOA carries full insurance coverage. The wording is explicit and strong, so confidence is very high.
No analysis available
I looked for direct public-remarks language indicating a passed fire/life safety evaluation or similar compliance wording, and there was nothing relevant. Because this feature is only confirmed from remarks and no such wording appears, I cannot mark it true.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Historically the building had high confidence for garden views and current MLS shows 4 of 20 listings with GARDEN in view_descriptions. Public remarks include landscaping references across multiple ads and one listing explicitly notes "garden views from your front-facing lanai," supporting that some units offer garden/courtyard views rather than this being a universal feature or agent copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sunset views are still supported for this building. At least 1 listing explicitly mentions "vibrant sunset views," while the rest of the remarks are neutral on views rather than contradicting them. This looks like a genuine building/unit-level feature rather than a copy-paste checkbox error, especially given the prior high-confidence status.
No analysis available
I searched for direct view language like "fireworks view," "watch fireworks from lanai," or "see fireworks from the unit." The remarks discuss beaches, sunsets, breezes, and lanai/patio space, but nothing about fireworks views.
No analysis available
Strong evidence supports an on-site resident manager. Multiple remarks explicitly say “an on-site resident manager ensures the community stays well-maintained,” “site manager’s office,” and “resident manager,” and the MLS amenities data currently shows RESMAN in 12 of 20 listings. The consistency across different listings and wording suggests this is a real building feature, not just a copied checkbox.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.