Palm Villas
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Palm Villas
Building Overview
Palm Villas in Ewa (built 1989) — wood-frame building with pool and sunset views. Window AC; resident manager on site.
About Palm Villas
Palm Villas is a residential building located in the Ewa neighborhood, built in 1989 and constructed with a wood frame. Based on MLS data, specific unit sizes and total number of units are not specified in the available records.
According to available records, Palm Villas offers on-site amenities including a pool and a resident manager. Units are served by window air conditioning and many units have sunset views.
Parking at Palm Villas is available, covered, assigned, with additional guest parking. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed per MLS information. Management company details are listed as unknown in the MLS. This summary is based on MLS data; buyers should verify all details, restrictions, and fees with the listing agent or management before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I reviewed the remarks for owner-occupancy clues, including explicit percentages and qualitative descriptions, but found nothing relevant. The listings mention both owner-occupant and investor suitability in a few places, but that is not evidence of the building's owner-occupancy rate.
I reviewed the public remarks for any explicit reference to elevators or an elevator count, including phrases like 'multiple elevators' and numeric counts, but found none. Because this is rarely included in MLS remarks and no current value was provided, the building's elevator count remains unknown from these remarks.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
Only 1/20 recent MLS listings list CABTV in association_fee_includes and none of the public remarks mention 'cable' or 'cable included'. With no corroborating agent remarks and no prior high-confidence history, evidence supports that cable is not included in the maintenance fee.
Common-area electricity appears to be included in the association/maintenance fees. The current MLS set shows OTCOEX in 17 of 20 listings, which is strong building-level evidence and suggests this is not just a one-off agent checkbox. The remarks don’t explicitly mention it, but they are consistent with the high-confidence MLS pattern.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Hot water is not included in the maintenance fees. The strongest evidence is the current MLS pattern: 0 of 20 recent listings show HOTWAT, while 16 of 20 mention WTRHTR, a strong indicator that hot water is provided by in-unit water heaters instead of the building. Remarks that mention a newer or brand-new water heater support this conclusion and make a fee-included hot-water feature very unlikely.
Only 1/20 MLS listings list INTSER under association_fee_includes and none of the public remarks mention 'internet included' or 'wifi in HOA'. With no supporting remarks and minimal MLS prevalence, evidence indicates internet service is not included in the maintenance fee.
No analysis available
Sewer appears to be included in the association fees. In the current MLS data, 15 of 20 listings list SEWER in association_fee_includes, which is strong evidence for a building-wide included utility. The public remarks do not specifically mention sewer, but they are consistent with the MLS pattern.
Water appears to be included in the maintenance fees. The current MLS data shows WATER in 16 of 20 recent listings, making this a high-confidence building feature. Because the remarks are largely standard marketing copy and do not contradict the MLS data, the inclusion is very likely real.
BBQ facilities are strongly supported across the listing remarks and appear to be a shared community amenity. Multiple listings mention a "BBQ area," "BBQ grills," and "BBQing and events," indicating this is not a one-off agent error but a consistently described building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is no mention of car wash facilities in the provided remarks across the listings reviewed. Because other amenities are described in detail when present, the complete absence of any car wash references strongly suggests the building does not offer this feature.
Multiple listings (several agent remarks) explicitly mention a clubhouse or community center despite only 1/20 MLS checkbox entries; phrases include 'clubhouse for BBQing and events', 'association provided clubhouse', and 'community center', suggesting the clubhouse is a real shared amenity but inconsistently flagged in MLS.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence that the building offers patio/deck-type outdoor space. Numerous listings explicitly mention a "private patio," "private lanai," "lanai to relax and entertain," "courtyard," "fenced yard," and "large lanai," with at least a dozen remarks referencing some form of outdoor area. The consistency across many listings and agents supports a building-level patio/deck amenity with very high confidence.
There is no remark-level evidence for a jogging or walking path in the listings provided. Given the weak current MLS presence and the absence of supporting descriptions across multiple agents, this feature is likely not reliably present in the building data.
No analysis available
Multiple current remarks (15+ listings) explicitly advertise private outdoor space with phrases like "private yard and patio", "fenced-in lanai", "fenced courtyard", "private patio and yard", and "fresh yard". The MLS amenities checkbox for private yard (PRIYAR) appears on several current listings (8/20 noted in MLS data) and numerous agent remarks consistently describe private fenced yards or patios, indicating the building offers private yard space for some units.
No analysis available
Recreation amenities are strongly supported by both MLS history and the public remarks. Multiple listings reference a shared recreation area/center, suggesting this is a consistent building-level amenity rather than isolated agent wording.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage is mentioned in several listings, but it appears to be unit-specific rather than a universal building amenity. Across the remarks, I found explicit phrases like “a private storage lanai” and “extra attic space used for additional storage,” which supports that some units have added storage space. The evidence is moderate and likely reflects selective unit features rather than a building-wide locker system.
No listings mention any dedicated surfboard or board storage facilities in the building or complex. References to storage are limited to private unit features like a storage lanai or attic space, which do not indicate a shared surfboard storage amenity. Based on this absence across many detailed remarks, the building likely does not offer dedicated surfboard storage.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong, consistent evidence that Palm Villas has a shared swimming pool. Current remarks mention the pool in many listings, including explicit phrases such as "community pool," "swimming pool," "pool and BBQ area," and "large pool and BBQ area," which appears across multiple agents rather than a single copy-paste source. This aligns with the prior high-confidence MLS amenity data.
No analysis available
I searched all remarks for 'salt water', 'saltwater', 'salt pool', 'saline', and similar terms and found no matches. Listings consistently refer only to a standard community pool, so the pool is very likely not salt water.
Strong, repeated evidence across many listings confirms this building offers in-unit laundry. Multiple agents explicitly mention it in different ways, including 'in-unit washer and dryer,' 'washer and dryer inside the unit,' 'full sized washer & dryer in the unit,' and 'stacked washer/dryer inside the unit.' The consistency across many remarks suggests this is a real building feature rather than a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for any indication of paid community laundry, such as 'coin laundry', 'coin-op', 'card-operated', or 'laundry fee', and found none. Combined with strong evidence of in-unit washers/dryers, this supports that there is no paid community laundry setup in the building.
Public remarks emphasize private in-unit laundry in unit after unit and never reference a community laundry room or laundry on each floor. I specifically looked for phrases like 'laundry on each floor', 'community laundry room', 'shared laundry', and found none. This strongly suggests there is no community laundry on every floor.
Strong, consistent evidence that the building provides parking. Across the remarks, there are repeated references to parking stalls, spots, and garage/covered/open parking, including examples like "one assigned parking stall," "2 parking stalls," and "1 covered and 1 open parking."
Assigned parking is clearly offered in the building. About half of current listings mark assigned parking, and multiple public remarks reinforce it with phrases such as "one assigned parking stall," "two assigned parking stalls," and "2 assigned parking spots."
Covered parking is strongly supported across the dataset. Most current listings indicate covered parking, and the remarks repeatedly mention covered stalls, garage-like parking, or paired covered/open configurations, suggesting this is a common building-level feature rather than a one-off listing note.
I looked for explicit deeded parking language, including owned stalls or parking included in the deed. The listings only mention assigned, covered, open, and guest parking, which does not establish deeded ownership.
No analysis available
I searched for parking fee language such as monthly parking cost, parking rental, or additional parking charge. The remarks list parking stalls and parking types, but do not mention any separate parking fee.
Guest parking appears to be available in the building. Roughly half of current listings flag guest parking, and several remarks confirm it with phrases like "ample guest parking" and "visitor stalls," which is consistent across multiple listings and agents.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for 'parking waitlist,' 'waiting list,' or 'join the waitlist' references and found none. The public remarks consistently indicate assigned parking stalls and guest parking, with no suggestion of a waitlist system.
No analysis available
Searched remarks for terms like key card, fob, electronic access, card reader, and keyless entry and found no mentions. Given the large number of listings and repeated amenity descriptions without any access-control reference, it is likely the building does not use a card/fob security system.
No analysis available
Reviewed all remarks for indications of a roving or on-site security patrol (e.g., 'security patrol', 'roving security', 'patrolled grounds') and found none. With many detailed descriptions of amenities but no security patrol references, the building likely does not have a formal security patrol service.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Window AC is strongly supported and appears consistently across the remarks. Well over a dozen listings explicitly say things like "window A/C," "window A/Cs," "window AC units," "3 window AC units," and "Window unit AC in each bedroom." This is consistent across multiple listings/agents, not just one copy-paste remark, so the feature should remain included.
No analysis available
Double-wall construction is marked in 15 of 20 current listings, making it the strongest of the three construction indicators. The public remarks do not explicitly mention it, so the evidence comes mainly from repeated MLS reporting across multiple listings rather than narrative confirmation.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Slab construction appears in only 8 of 20 current listings, which is a weaker and less consistent signal than the other construction fields. No remarks explicitly mention a concrete slab or solid foundation, so this may reflect inconsistent MLS entry rather than a strongly confirmed building feature.
No analysis available
Wood-frame construction appears in 13 of 20 current listings, which suggests it is a commonly reported building feature. However, none of the public remarks explicitly say "wood frame" or similar, so this looks like MLS checkbox-based evidence rather than agent-verified description.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for STR indicators like short-term rental allowed, vacation rental allowed, NUC, TVU, or 30-day minimum rules. The remarks do not provide any explicit evidence that STRs are allowed, so this is treated as not supported by the public remarks.
I looked for hotel pool language such as hotel rental program, managed by hotel, Hilton/Trump/Ritz pool, or similar participation terms. There is no such mention in the listings, and since STR is not established, hotel pool participation is also unsupported.
I searched for mandatory pool wording like required rental program, cannot opt out, or must participate. The public remarks contain no such language, so there is no basis to mark this as mandatory.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for leasehold language such as "lease expires," "ground lease ends," "leasehold expiring," and specific 4-digit expiry years. None of the public remarks include any land tenure lease expiry information, so the year remains unknown.
The remarks directly confirm VA financing eligibility. Multiple listings reference VA assumable options and one explicitly states the building is VA approved, which is strong public evidence. I did not need to infer this from context.
I looked for language indicating the HOA provides full or walls-in insurance coverage, but the remarks do not mention insurance terms at all. Without direct wording about full insurance coverage, this cannot be confirmed from the listings.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for any indication that the building passed a fire/life safety evaluation or fire inspection, but there were no explicit references. The presence of a resident manager does not confirm FLSE status, so there is no evidence here to mark this feature true.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
At least 4 different listings' remarks explicitly advertise mountain views, quoting phrases like "stunning unobstructed views of the Waianae Mountain range" and "mountain facing open air lanai." The mentions are explicit and appear across multiple agent remarks, so there is strong evidence the building offers mountain-view units despite the MLS view_descriptions checkboxes not showing MOUNTA.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sunset views are strongly supported. At least 2 current listings explicitly mention 'sunsets' / 'stunning unobstructed views ... and sunsets,' and one listing also references the unit being on the 'cool side' with the sun on the opposite side, reinforcing west-facing/sunset exposure. The evidence appears consistent across multiple remarks and is not limited to a single agent.
No analysis available
Searched for references to fireworks views or watching fireworks from the unit/lanai and found none despite very detailed marketing language about views and lifestyle. This sustained absence strongly suggests the building does not offer notable fireworks views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Resident manager is strongly supported by both MLS checkbox data and repeated public remarks. At least 2 listings explicitly mention a resident manager, including phrases like 'resident manager on site' and 'resident manager.' The evidence is consistent across multiple agents and does not look like a one-off copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.