Palm Villas
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Palm Villas
Building Overview
Palm Villas in Ewa (built 1989) — wood-frame building with pool and sunset views. Window AC; resident manager on site.
About Palm Villas
Palm Villas is a residential building located in the Ewa neighborhood, built in 1989 and constructed with a wood frame. Based on MLS data, specific unit sizes and total number of units are not specified in the available records.
According to available records, Palm Villas offers on-site amenities including a pool and a resident manager. Units are served by window air conditioning and many units have sunset views.
Parking at Palm Villas is available, covered, assigned, with additional guest parking. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed per MLS information. Management company details are listed as unknown in the MLS. This summary is based on MLS data; buyers should verify all details, restrictions, and fees with the listing agent or management before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit owner-occupancy percentages or descriptive statements indicating the level of owner-occupancy and found none in the public remarks. Because no numeric/current value is provided and there is no explicit evidence, the owner-occupancy percentage is unknown and not estimated.
I searched the remarks for any explicit elevator counts or references (terms like 'elevator', '4 elevators', 'four elevators', 'multiple elevators') and found none. Because there is no numeric current value provided in the data and no explicit mention in the remarks, the number of elevators is unknown. Per rules, I will not guess or change a numeric value without explicit evidence.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
15 of 20 recent MLS listings list OTCOEX (common-area electricity) under association_fee_includes, indicating the HOA typically covers building/common electricity. Public remarks do not usually call this out (agents rarely state it in copy), but the strong and consistent MLS checkbox presence across multiple listings suggests this is a building-level feature rather than a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings (0/20) include HOTWAT in association_fee_includes and 15 of 20 list WTRHTR (unit water heater) in inclusions; public remarks repeatedly mention 'brand new water heater' or 'newer water heater.' This shows hot water is supplied by individual unit heaters and not covered by HOA fees.
No analysis available
No analysis available
15 of 20 recent MLS listings list SEWER under association_fee_includes, indicating sewer service is typically covered by the HOA. Remarks do not frequently mention sewer, but the consistent MLS checkbox presence across multiple listings provides strong evidence this is a building-level inclusion.
16 of 20 recent MLS listings include WATER in association_fee_includes, showing water is typically covered by the HOA. While public remarks only occasionally allude to HOA fee benefits, the consistent MLS entries across multiple listings indicate this is a building-level feature.
Strong evidence across listings: MLS marks BBQ in 14 of 20 listings and numerous remarks state 'BBQ area', 'BBQ grills', or 'BBQ grills for those weekend get-togethers.' Mentions appear in many different agent remarks (e.g., 'BBQ area', 'BBQ grills', 'clubhouse for BBQing'), indicating a building-level shared amenity rather than a single-unit feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings (several agent remarks) explicitly mention a clubhouse or community center despite only 1/20 MLS checkbox entries; phrases include 'clubhouse for BBQing and events', 'association provided clubhouse', and 'community center', suggesting the clubhouse is a real shared amenity but inconsistently flagged in MLS.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Building-level outdoor spaces are well documented: more than 20 of the compiled listing remarks explicitly mention private patios/lanai/yards (phrases include 'private patio', 'fenced-in lanai', 'private lanai', and 'enclosed patio'). Although the current MLS amenity checkbox is set on 10/20 listings, the remarks consistently describe unit outdoor spaces across many agents and listings, indicating the feature exists and is offered in numerous units.
No remark-level evidence: while MLS flags jogging/walking path in only 2 of 20 current listings, none of the public remarks reference a 'jogging path', 'walking path', or 'running trail.' The absence of any mention across many agent remarks suggests the jogging/walking path is not a prominent/shared amenity in this building's listings.
No analysis available
At least 10 different ground-floor listings describe private yard-like spaces using phrases such as 'your very own private yard and patio', 'private patio and yard area', 'ground-floor unit with yard', 'your own fenced yard', 'nice little yard', and 'fenced courtyard'. These recurring descriptions across many separately listed units show that several Palm Villas homes offer true private yard/courtyard spaces, so buyers seeking private outdoor yard areas can find them in this building.
No analysis available
Well-supported building amenity: MLS includes recreation area for 14 of 20 listings and many public remarks reference 'recreation area/center/room' or 'recreation areas' (e.g., 'Recreation Center', 'recreation area') across different agents' listings, confirming a shared recreation amenity at the complex.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence shows the building offers storage: MLS checkboxes currently appear on a subset of listings (2/20 amenities; 4/20 unit_features) and at least two agent remarks explicitly reference storage—"private storage lanai - a rare find" and "extra attic space used for additional storage." The mentions come from different listings (not obviously copy/paste), so while storage is not universal, the building does offer storage units/lockers or extra storage for some units.
No listings mention any dedicated surfboard or board storage facilities in the building or complex. References to storage are limited to private unit features like a storage lanai or attic space, which do not indicate a shared surfboard storage amenity. Based on this absence across many detailed remarks, the building likely does not offer dedicated surfboard storage.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All current MLS listings (20/20) include the pool amenity and numerous agent remarks repeatedly mention the shared amenity—phrases include "community pool", "swimming pool", "sparkling community pool", and "large pool deck." Evidence is consistent across many agent remarks rather than isolated, indicating a building-level shared pool is present.
No analysis available
I searched all remarks for 'salt water', 'saltwater', 'salt pool', 'saline', and similar terms and found no matches. Listings consistently refer only to a standard community pool, so the pool is very likely not salt water.
Strong evidence across listings that some units include in-unit laundry: 19 of 20 recent MLS listings indicate washer/dryer included. Remarks explicitly state phrases like "in-unit washer and dryer", "washer/dryer inside the unit", and "stacked washer/dryer" across multiple agents/listings, indicating the building offers units with in-unit laundry (evidence appears consistent rather than a single copy/paste).
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for any indication of paid community laundry, such as 'coin laundry', 'coin-op', 'card-operated', or 'laundry fee', and found none. Combined with strong evidence of in-unit washers/dryers, this supports that there is no paid community laundry setup in the building.
Public remarks emphasize private in-unit laundry in unit after unit and never reference a community laundry room or laundry on each floor. I specifically looked for phrases like 'laundry on each floor', 'community laundry room', 'shared laundry', and found none. This strongly suggests there is no community laundry on every floor.
Strong, consistent evidence across listings that the building provides parking: MLS checkbox data shows 19 of 20 listings list parking features and many remarks state '2 parking stalls', 'two assigned parking stalls', or 'assigned parking spot'. This is repeated across multiple agents and unit remarks, indicating building-level on-site parking for buyers.
Numerous independent listings describe 'two assigned parking stalls', '2 assigned parking stalls', or 'one assigned parking spot', indicating stalls are reserved/assigned to specific units. With over half of MLS records also checking ASSIGN, evidence is strong that Palm Villas uses assigned/deeded parking rather than unallocated common stalls.
High historical confidence (MLS: 16/20 listings indicate covered parking) is supported by many public remarks that explicitly mention covered stalls: phrases include "one covered parking stall", "one covered and one open", and "two parking stalls—one covered". Evidence is consistent across multiple agent listings (likely some copy/paste), but the repeated explicit mentions across many listings provide strong support that the building offers covered parking.
I searched for explicit language such as 'deeded parking', 'owned parking', or 'parking included in deed' but found none. The remarks consistently describe assigned/covered/open stalls (which imply allocation) but do not indicate the stalls are deeded/owned with the unit.
No analysis available
I looked for phrases like 'parking fee', 'monthly parking charge', or 'additional cost for parking' but found no references. There is no information in the public remarks about any parking fee, so the monthly parking fee is unknown.
Guest/visitor parking is documented in many listings (MLS: 10/20) and several remarks explicitly note 'guest parking', 'visitor stalls', or 'ample guest parking', indicating the building provides parking for visitors in addition to assigned stalls.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for 'parking waitlist', 'waiting list', or similar language and found none. Given the absence of any advertised waitlist system and multiple mentions of assigned and guest parking, the building does not appear to advertise a parking waitlist.
No analysis available
Searched remarks for terms like key card, fob, electronic access, card reader, and keyless entry and found no mentions. Given the large number of listings and repeated amenity descriptions without any access-control reference, it is likely the building does not use a card/fob security system.
No analysis available
Reviewed all remarks for indications of a roving or on-site security patrol (e.g., 'security patrol', 'roving security', 'patrolled grounds') and found none. With many detailed descriptions of amenities but no security patrol references, the building likely does not have a formal security patrol service.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Historical MLS data showed 18/20 listings with the ACWIUN checkbox. Current public remarks repeatedly confirm this—agents wrote phrases like "window A/C", "window ACs", "window unit AC in each bedroom", and "window A/C units in the living room and bedrooms" across multiple listings—showing strong, consistent evidence from many agents (likely not a single copy/paste). Buyers searching for units with window air conditioning should consider this building offers window AC units.
No analysis available
14 of 20 recent MLS listings include DOUWAL in construction materials, but 0 of the supplied public remarks explicitly mention "double wall," "double-wall," or similar. The feature is therefore supported by multiple MLS entries (moderate signal) but lacks corroboration in agents' public remarks and may reflect checkbox copy/paste rather than repeated descriptive confirmation.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
7 of 20 current MLS listings include SLAB (concrete slab foundation) in construction materials, with prior data showing a similar minority. No public remarks mention 'concrete slab' or 'solid concrete foundation'; the evidence is moderate and comes from MLS checkbox entries across several listings rather than explicit remarks, so confidence is moderate (0.72).
No analysis available
13 of 20 current MLS listings include WOOFRA (wood frame) in construction materials and prior sampling showed similar counts (~14/20). No public remarks explicitly mention 'wood frame'—evidence comes from consistent MLS checkbox entries across multiple agents, which may reflect true building construction but could also be copy/paste; confidence is moderate (0.78).
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for explicit STR allowance language and for minimum-stay rules (e.g., 30-day minimum) but found no guidance. With no public-remarks evidence, STR permission is assumed not advertised/unknown and set to false per rules for silent remarks.
I searched for 'hotel rental pool', 'hotel rental program', or references to a hotel brand managing rentals and found none. Because STR is not indicated as allowed in the remarks, hotel-rental-pool participation is set to false.
I looked for phrases like 'mandatory hotel pool', 'required to participate', or 'must be in rental program' and found none. Given the absence of STR/hotel pool mentions and no language indicating mandatory participation, mandatory pool participation is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for phrases like 'lease expires', 'land lease to', 'leasehold expiring', and 4-digit years indicating lease expiry but found no references. Because the listings are silent on land tenure/leasehold, the lease expiry year is unknown.
Several listings explicitly reference VA approval and VA-assumable financing (multiple occurrences of 'VA approved', 'VA ASSUMABLE', and assumable rates). This provides strong, consistent evidence that the building is VA loan approved.
I searched the remarks for explicit insurance statements (phrases like 'fully insured', 'walls-in coverage', 'full insurance', 'comprehensive building insurance') and found none. Because there is no explicit mention and no current value provided, this boolean is set to false with medium confidence following the rule that absence likely means the feature does not exist.
No analysis available
I reviewed the public remarks for explicit statements that the building passed a fire/life safety evaluation (terms like 'FLSE passed', 'fire safety certified', 'passed fire inspection') and found none. With no explicit mention and no current value provided, the field is set to false with medium confidence per the boolean rules (absence = likely doesn't exist).
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Historical records previously showed at least one listing explicitly advertising sunsets. In the current remarks at least one listing again states: "stunning unobstructed views of the Waianae Mountain range and sunsets," confirming that some units have sunset views. Evidence is limited to a small number of listings (appears in 1 listing) while others emphasize mountain views or morning sun, but the explicit sunset mention and prior high-confidence history justify including view_sunset for the building.
No analysis available
Searched for references to fireworks views or watching fireworks from the unit/lanai and found none despite very detailed marketing language about views and lifestyle. This sustained absence strongly suggests the building does not offer notable fireworks views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Historic MLS checkbox data lists RESMAN in 14 of 20 listings. Current public remarks explicitly mention a resident manager in multiple listings (at least 6 separate remarks include phrases like 'resident manager on site' or 'resident manager'), indicating the building maintains an on-site/live-in manager. Evidence is consistent across different agents and aligns with the prior high-confidence MLS data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.