Palehua Villas
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Palehua Villas
Building Overview
Palehua Villas in Makakilo-Kapolei-Honokai Hale; concrete building (1987) offering ocean and mountain views, resident manager on site.
About Palehua Villas
Based on MLS data, Palehua Villas is a concrete residential building located in the Makakilo-Kapolei-Honokai Hale neighborhood. The building was constructed in 1987. Size and unit count are not specified in the available records.
Key features listed in MLS records include ocean and mountain views and a resident manager. The management company is noted as unknown in the available data. Pets and short-term rentals are not permitted according to the provided information.
Assigned parking is available. Other fees, maintenance assessments, and detailed building rules are not specified in the MLS data. Buyers should verify all details, including management contact, exact unit sizes, fees, and policies, with their agent or the seller prior to making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I scanned all remarks for explicit percentages or clear statements about owner-occupancy (e.g., '80% owner occupied', 'majority owner occupied') and found none. Without explicit data in the remarks, the owner-occupancy percentage is unknown and cannot be inferred.
I searched all provided public remarks for explicit phrases like '4 elevators', 'four elevators', 'multiple elevators', 'elevator' or 'lift' and found no references. Without an explicit numeric statement in the remarks, I will not guess a number; the count remains unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
MLS checkbox data lists OTCOEX (common-area electricity) in 18 of 20 recent listings, indicating building/common electric is included in maintenance fees. Public remarks do not explicitly mention common-area electricity, suggesting agent copy/paste of association inclusions across listings, but the strong MLS consistency across multiple agents yields high confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No MLS listings include HOTWAT (0/20) while 19/20 list WTRHTR, and several public remarks explicitly mention 'new water heater' or 'in-unit water heater', supporting that hot water is not building-supplied or included in maintenance fees. Evidence across MLS checkboxes and remarks is consistent and strong.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The majority of MLS listings (18 of 20) indicate sewer is included in association fees; public remarks explicitly confirm 'maintenance fees ... include water, sewer and building maintenance' for at least one listing. Multiple agents consistently listing SEWER suggests strong building-level inclusion.
MLS checkbox data lists water included in 18 of 20 recent listings, and public remarks explicitly confirm 'maintenance fees ... include water, sewer' for at least one listing. Consistent MLS entries across many listings and corroborating remarks provide strong evidence that water is included in HOA fees.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No public remarks (0 of ~30 concatenated listings provided) mention 'car wash', 'auto wash', or similar. Although 11/20 MLS records currently have the CRWSH amenity checked, historical analysis showed high confidence that the building does not offer a car wash and the listing remarks contain no supporting language. The discrepancy appears to be inconsistent checkbox usage by agents rather than actual new building amenities, so car_wash is reported as false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 20 current MLS listings (20/20) list washer/dryer in the inclusions and multiple public remarks explicitly note in-unit laundry — phrases include "in-unit washer + dryer", "washer and dryer are conveniently located in-unit", "full size stacked washer and dryer", and "upgraded laundry center." Evidence is consistent across many agents and listings, indicating the building offers units with in-unit laundry.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong, consistent evidence that the building provides parking: 20/20 MLS listings include parking features and multiple public remarks explicitly state parking availability (e.g., 'two parking stalls', 'TWO PARKING STALLS', 'ample parking'). This appears across many agents and listings and aligns with high-confidence historical data.
High-confidence evidence that parking is typically assigned: 19/20 MLS listings show 'ASSIGN' and many public remarks explicitly state 'assigned parking stall', 'designated parking stall', or 'two assigned parking stalls', indicating assigned/reserved stalls are commonly provided.
No analysis available
Listings consistently mention 'assigned' or 'designated' parking stalls (e.g., 'two assigned parking stalls', 'designated parking stall'), but none explicitly say parking is deeded/owned. Based solely on the public remarks, there is no evidence parking is deeded.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit parking fee language (e.g., 'monthly parking charge', 'parking fee') and found none. The public remarks do not provide a parking fee amount or indicate paid parking.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for phrases like 'parking waitlist' or 'waiting list' and found none. The remarks focus on assigned stalls and nearby guest/street parking rather than a waitlist system, so absence is interpreted as likely no waitlist.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Nine of 20 recent MLS listings have the construction_materials checkbox set to 'CONCRE', suggesting some records list the building as concrete. However, none of the public remarks across these listings explicitly state 'concrete', 'concrete building', or 'reinforced concrete', so the evidence is uncertain and may be due to inconsistent agent data entry rather than a confirmed building feature.
Double-wall construction (DOUWAL) appears in 12 of 20 recent MLS entries for this building, making it the most commonly selected construction type code. Public remarks do not address wall construction directly, but the consistency of MLS data across many listings supports that the building uses double-wall construction. This pattern across multiple agents and listings reinforces the likelihood that double-wall construction is accurate.
Only 1 of 20 current MLS listings shows HOLTIL (hollow tile) in construction materials. None of the public remarks mention 'hollow tile'—they reference floor tile and wood-look tile but not hollow-tile construction—so evidence for hollow-tile construction is minimal and uncertain across agents.
MLS checkbox data shows masonry/stucco construction in 10 of 20 recent listings ('MASSTU' selected), but none of the public remarks explicitly reference 'masonry' or 'stucco'. This yields moderate confidence based on checkbox prevalence across listings rather than corroborating agent narrative.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
A smaller subset of listings (2 of 20) mark ABOGRO in the construction_materials field, indicating above-ground construction. This field is less frequently used and not discussed in remarks, so the evidence is weaker and likely reflects under-reporting rather than absence. Given the positive MLS indications and no contradictory data, above-ground construction is treated as present but with moderate confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for explicit STR language and regulatory terms and found no evidence that short-term rentals are permitted. Several listings mention investor interest or 'rental friendly' but that does not confirm short-term/vacation rental allowance.
There is no reference to a hotel rental pool, hotel-managed program, or affiliation with hotel operations in any public remarks. Since STR is not indicated, hotel-pool participation is considered false.
No remarks indicate any rental-pool participation, let alone a mandatory requirement. Because STR is not indicated, mandatory hotel-pool participation is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched all remarks for leasehold language (e.g., 'lease expires 2050', 'land lease to 2065', 'leasehold') and found no references. Without an explicit year, the lease expiry is unknown from the public remarks.
Several public remarks explicitly state the project/units are VA approved, indicating VA financing is accepted. I searched for phrases like 'VA approved' and found multiple direct mentions across listings.
I searched for explicit terms that would indicate the HOA provides full building/walls-in insurance and did not find them. In the absence of any remark or user verification, this is set to false with medium confidence.
No analysis available
I reviewed the remarks for explicit language indicating the building passed a fire/life safety evaluation (FLSE) or similar certification and found none. When there is no mention and no verified current value, the conservative default is false with medium confidence.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Multiple unit remarks (10+ separate remarks in the supplied set) explicitly advertise ocean or Pacific Ocean views—phrases include "ocean views", "peek-a-boo ocean views", and "Pacific Ocean." Evidence appears across listings from different agents and in prominent placement in the remarks, supporting a strong building-level offering of ocean-view units.
Remarks for at least one (likely more) units specifically call out a 'partial mountain view', and the hillside Makakilo location makes mauka-facing views plausible. While fewer listings mention mountains than ocean, the explicit 'partial mountain view' language indicates the building offers units with mountain views. Buyers seeking mountain outlooks would reasonably include this building in their search.
Diamond Head is explicitly mentioned across several unit remarks (6+ separate remarks) with phrases like "Diamond Head and ocean views", "views of Diamond Head", and "180 degrees of Spectacular views of Diamond Head." Multiple agents reference the feature, indicating building-level availability of Diamond Head views for some units.
No analysis available
Several unit remarks (3–5 separate remarks) specifically reference the coastline—phrases include "Ewa Beach coastline" and references to the Leeward Coast—supporting that the building offers coastline views for certain units.
Limited evidence for garden views: 1 of 20 current MLS view_descriptions lists GARDEN, but none of the public remarks mention 'garden view', 'courtyard view', or 'landscaped view'. This suggests a possible isolated checkbox entry by an agent; include the feature for buyers but with low confidence until corroborated.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across roughly 20 remark sets, agents frequently highlight 'ocean and sunset views' and other outlooks but never mention sunrise, morning sun, or eastern exposure. With only 1/20 MLS view_descriptions tagging SUNRIS and zero textual support, sunrise views appear not to be a notable or reliable feature of this building. It is therefore unlikely that buyers specifically seeking sunrise views would target this property based on its typical orientation and marketing.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The MLS amenity box for a resident/on-site manager is checked in 18 of 20 current listings (prior data ~19/20), indicating the building typically lists a resident/on-site manager. None of the provided public remarks explicitly mention a resident or on-site manager, so confirmation is based on the strong and consistent MLS checkbox usage across multiple listings rather than remark text.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.