Palehua Villas
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Palehua Villas
Building Overview
Palehua Villas in Makakilo-Kapolei-Honokai Hale; concrete building (1987) offering ocean and mountain views, resident manager on site.
About Palehua Villas
Based on MLS data, Palehua Villas is a concrete residential building located in the Makakilo-Kapolei-Honokai Hale neighborhood. The building was constructed in 1987. Size and unit count are not specified in the available records.
Key features listed in MLS records include ocean and mountain views and a resident manager. The management company is noted as unknown in the available data. Pets and short-term rentals are not permitted according to the provided information.
Assigned parking is available. Other fees, maintenance assessments, and detailed building rules are not specified in the MLS data. Buyers should verify all details, including management contact, exact unit sizes, fees, and policies, with their agent or the seller prior to making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for owner-occupancy indicators such as exact percentages, 'majority owner occupied,' or similar qualitative descriptions, but none were present. The remarks mention owner-occupants and investors as possible buyers, but that does not indicate the actual occupancy rate.
I searched the public remarks for explicit elevator references such as 'elevators,' 'four elevators,' or 'multiple elevators,' but found none. With no remarks evidence to support a number, the elevator count remains unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The MLS history strongly supports common-area electricity being included, with 18 of 20 recent listings checking OTCOEX. None of the public remarks explicitly mention it, but the checkbox pattern is very consistent across listings and agents, which makes this a high-confidence building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No recent listings include HOTWAT, while 19 of 20 include WTRHTR, a strong sign that hot water is unit-supplied. Several remarks mention a "new water heater" or similar wording, which aligns with the MLS data and supports a false value with very high confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer inclusion is supported by the MLS pattern, with 18 of 20 listings checking SEWER. At least one remark explicitly states maintenance fees include "water, sewer and building maintenance," which matches the MLS data and makes this a high-confidence feature.
Water inclusion is supported by both the MLS history and the remarks. The checkbox appears in 18 of 20 listings, and one listing explicitly states maintenance fees include "water, sewer and building maintenance," confirming this at high confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No public remarks (0 of ~30 concatenated listings provided) mention 'car wash', 'auto wash', or similar. Although 11/20 MLS records currently have the CRWSH amenity checked, historical analysis showed high confidence that the building does not offer a car wash and the listing remarks contain no supporting language. The discrepancy appears to be inconsistent checkbox usage by agents rather than actual new building amenities, so car_wash is reported as false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
In-unit laundry is strongly confirmed for Palehua Villas. Multiple listings explicitly say "washer/dryer in the unit," "in-unit washer and dryer," "washer + dryer," and "stacked washer/dryer," and the current MLS data shows 20/20 listings including washer/dryer. The evidence is consistent across many remarks, suggesting this is not a copy-paste error but a real building feature available to buyers.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Parking is clearly available in this building. Across the provided remarks, dozens of listings mention “2 parking stalls,” “parking stall,” “parking spaces,” or “open parking stall,” with no meaningful contradiction; this appears consistently across multiple agents rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
Assigned parking is strongly supported for this building. Multiple remarks explicitly describe “assigned parking” or “designated parking stall(s),” and the high MLS match rate indicates this is a real building-level feature rather than isolated listing language.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit language like deeded parking, owned stall, parking included in deed, or deeded stall. The remarks consistently mention assigned/designated stalls instead, which does not establish deeded parking.
No analysis available
I searched for parking fee language such as monthly parking charge, rental cost, or additional parking expense. The remarks only describe the number and location of stalls, not any separate parking fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for references to parking waitlists or waitlist procedures. None were found in the public remarks, so there is no evidence that this building uses a parking waitlist system.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There are no explicit mentions of concrete construction in any of the provided public remarks. The MLS checkbox appears in 9 of 20 listings, but the lack of supporting remarks makes this look like unverified agent checkbox data rather than confirmed building construction.
Double-wall construction remains the stronger building-level signal here, with 9 of 20 recent MLS listings marked DOUWAL and prior analysis already rating it high confidence. None of the public remarks explicitly mention it, so the evidence is mostly from consistent MLS checkbox data rather than agent narrative.
Only 1 of 20 current MLS listings shows HOLTIL (hollow tile) in construction materials. None of the public remarks mention 'hollow tile'—they reference floor tile and wood-look tile but not hollow-tile construction—so evidence for hollow-tile construction is minimal and uncertain across agents.
MLS checkbox data shows masonry/stucco construction in 10 of 20 recent listings ('MASSTU' selected), but none of the public remarks explicitly reference 'masonry' or 'stucco'. This yields moderate confidence based on checkbox prevalence across listings rather than corroborating agent narrative.
No analysis available
None of the listings mention slab construction, and the sparse MLS checkbox presence does not provide enough evidence to confirm it. This appears to be an unverified MLS attribute rather than a feature confirmed by remarks or multiple agents.
No analysis available
No analysis available
A smaller subset of listings (2 of 20) mark ABOGRO in the construction_materials field, indicating above-ground construction. This field is less frequently used and not discussed in remarks, so the evidence is weaker and likely reflects under-reporting rather than absence. Given the positive MLS indications and no contradictory data, above-ground construction is treated as present but with moderate confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for STR-specific terms such as short-term rental allowed, legal vacation rental, NUC, TVU, or similar wording. The remarks do not explicitly permit short-term rentals, and nothing indicates a 30-day-minimum exception or other STR authorization.
I looked for hotel rental pool language such as Hilton/Trump/Ritz pool, managed-by-hotel wording, or rental program references. None appear in the remarks, and there is no evidence supporting hotel-pool participation.
I searched for language indicating mandatory hotel pool participation, required rental program enrollment, or no opt-out option. The remarks contain none of that, so there is no basis to mark this as mandatory.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for leasehold, ground lease, lease expiry, renewal, and end-date language such as "lease expires 2050" or "ground lease ends." Nothing in the remarks identifies a lease expiration year, so this remains unknown.
The public remarks repeatedly and directly state that the building/units are VA approved. This is strong evidence for VA loan eligibility, with no contradictory statements found.
The remarks provide strong, repeated evidence that the building/HOA carries full insurance coverage, using explicit phrases like 'fully hurricane insured' and '100% hurricane insured.' This is a clear positive match for fully insured walls-in style coverage.
No analysis available
I looked for language indicating the building passed a fire/life safety evaluation or similar fire safety compliance wording, but nothing was mentioned in the remarks. Since this feature is only determined from public remarks and there is no evidence, it remains unconfirmed.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Strong evidence across many listings that this building offers ocean views. At least 10+ remarks explicitly reference ocean views or similar phrases such as 'beautiful ocean and mountain views,' 'peek-a-boo ocean views,' and 'views of the ocean and Ewa Plain,' which is consistent across multiple agents and appears to be genuine rather than copy-paste error.
Remarks for at least one (likely more) units specifically call out a 'partial mountain view', and the hillside Makakilo location makes mauka-facing views plausible. While fewer listings mention mountains than ocean, the explicit 'partial mountain view' language indicates the building offers units with mountain views. Buyers seeking mountain outlooks would reasonably include this building in their search.
Multiple current listings confirm Diamond Head views for some units in the building. The remarks include direct phrases like 'Diamond Head and ocean views' and 'Spectacular views of Diamond Head through the blue Pacific Ocean,' giving strong building-level evidence that some units have this view.
There is moderate but clear evidence that some units in the building have city views. Current remarks explicitly mention 'stunning ocean and city views,' and MLS data shows CITY in 5/20 listings, indicating this is a real building-level feature for at least some units.
There are several remarks supporting coastline views, with at least a few explicitly naming 'the Ewa Beach coastline' and related coastal-facing outlooks. The evidence is somewhat less frequent than ocean views but still consistent across multiple listings. This supports including coastline view as an available building feature.
Limited evidence for garden views: 1 of 20 current MLS view_descriptions lists GARDEN, but none of the public remarks mention 'garden view', 'courtyard view', or 'landscaped view'. This suggests a possible isolated checkbox entry by an agent; include the feature for buyers but with low confidence until corroborated.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across roughly 20 remark sets, agents frequently highlight 'ocean and sunset views' and other outlooks but never mention sunrise, morning sun, or eastern exposure. With only 1/20 MLS view_descriptions tagging SUNRIS and zero textual support, sunrise views appear not to be a notable or reliable feature of this building. It is therefore unlikely that buyers specifically seeking sunrise views would target this property based on its typical orientation and marketing.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Resident manager remains a strong building-level feature based on MLS data: 18 of 20 current listings show RESMAN in amenities. None of the public remarks explicitly mention or contradict an on-site/live-in manager, so there is no evidence of a change. This looks like a consistent amenity that may be carried in MLS data rather than repeatedly described in remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.