Palehua Villas
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Palehua Villas
Building Overview
Palehua Villas in Makakilo-Kapolei-Honokai Hale; concrete building (1987) offering ocean and mountain views, resident manager on site.
About Palehua Villas
Based on MLS data, Palehua Villas is a concrete residential building located in the Makakilo-Kapolei-Honokai Hale neighborhood. The building was constructed in 1987. Size and unit count are not specified in the available records.
Key features listed in MLS records include ocean and mountain views and a resident manager. The management company is noted as unknown in the available data. Pets and short-term rentals are not permitted according to the provided information.
Assigned parking is available. Other fees, maintenance assessments, and detailed building rules are not specified in the MLS data. Buyers should verify all details, including management contact, exact unit sizes, fees, and policies, with their agent or the seller prior to making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks were searched for an owner-occupancy percentage and descriptions such as "majority owner occupied" or "highly owner occupied," but none were found. The owner-occupancy percentage is therefore unknown.
The remarks were searched for explicit elevator references such as "4 elevators," "four elevators," or "multiple elevators," but none were found. The number of elevators is therefore unknown and cannot be inferred from the building's three floors and 138 units.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Common-area electricity is included according to 18 of 20 current MLS listings marked OTCOEX. No public remarks explicitly discuss common-area electricity, so the evidence comes primarily from a strong, repeated MLS checkbox pattern rather than independent agent descriptions.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Hot water is not included: 0 of 20 listings mark HOTWAT, while 19 of 20 mark WTRHTR. Public remarks repeatedly state “new water heater” or describe an in-unit water heater, providing consistent confirmation across multiple listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer inclusion is strongly supported by 18 of 20 listings marking SEWER. One public remark explicitly says maintenance fees “include water, sewer and building maintenance,” confirming the feature beyond repeated MLS checkbox data.
Water inclusion is supported by 18 of 20 current listings marking WATER. The statement “maintenance fees of only $366 per month include water, sewer and building maintenance” directly confirms the feature, although it appears in only one remark.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No public remarks (0 of ~30 concatenated listings provided) mention 'car wash', 'auto wash', or similar. Although 11/20 MLS records currently have the CRWSH amenity checked, historical analysis showed high confidence that the building does not offer a car wash and the listing remarks contain no supporting language. The discrepancy appears to be inconsistent checkbox usage by agents rather than actual new building amenities, so car_wash is reported as false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
In-unit laundry is overwhelmingly supported across the listings, with at least 17 current remarks explicitly mentioning an in-unit washer/dryer, stacked washer/dryer, upgraded laundry center, or a unit-owned washer and dryer. The evidence is consistent across many different listing descriptions and directly confirms the historically high-confidence MLS data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Parking is consistently documented across the building, with at least 20 listings referencing parking or stalls, including multiple listings specifying two stalls and one listing mentioning an open parking stall. The current MLS data also confirms parking on all 20 listings, making the evidence overwhelmingly strong across multiple agents.
Assigned parking is explicitly mentioned in well over 10 listings, with repeated phrases such as '2 assigned parking stalls,' 'one assigned parking stall,' 'designated parking stall,' and 'two assigned parking spaces.' The MLS data supports this strongly, with ASSIGN selected on 19 of 20 listings; the evidence is consistent across multiple remarks rather than relying only on copied checkbox data.
No analysis available
Listings consistently mention assigned or designated parking stalls, but assigned parking does not establish deeded ownership. No explicit language such as "deeded parking," "owned stall," or parking included in the deed was found.
No analysis available
The remarks describe the number and location of parking stalls but do not provide a parking fee. Because no monthly or additional parking charge is stated, the fee is unknown.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The listings discuss assigned, designated, and open parking but contain no reference to a parking waitlist. There is no evidence of a waitlist system in the public remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There are no explicit mentions of concrete construction in any of the provided public remarks. The MLS checkbox appears in 9 of 20 listings, but the lack of supporting remarks makes this look like unverified agent checkbox data rather than confirmed building construction.
Double-wall construction is supported primarily by current MLS construction data, with DOUWAL reported in 9 of 20 listings. None of the provided remarks explicitly mention “double wall,” “double-wall construction,” or “two walls,” so the evidence appears to derive from recurring MLS data rather than independent agent descriptions.
Only 1 of 20 current MLS listings shows HOLTIL (hollow tile) in construction materials. None of the public remarks mention 'hollow tile'—they reference floor tile and wood-look tile but not hollow-tile construction—so evidence for hollow-tile construction is minimal and uncertain across agents.
MLS checkbox data shows masonry/stucco construction in 10 of 20 recent listings ('MASSTU' selected), but none of the public remarks explicitly reference 'masonry' or 'stucco'. This yields moderate confidence based on checkbox prevalence across listings rather than corroborating agent narrative.
No analysis available
None of the listings mention slab construction, and the sparse MLS checkbox presence does not provide enough evidence to confirm it. This appears to be an unverified MLS attribute rather than a feature confirmed by remarks or multiple agents.
No analysis available
No analysis available
A smaller subset of listings (2 of 20) mark ABOGRO in the construction_materials field, indicating above-ground construction. This field is less frequently used and not discussed in remarks, so the evidence is weaker and likely reflects under-reporting rather than absence. Given the positive MLS indications and no contradictory data, above-ground construction is treated as present but with moderate confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks mention investors and a "rental friendly investment property," but do not specifically establish short-term rental permission. No direct STR approval or prohibition was found, so this is treated as false under the no-evidence rule.
The public remarks contain no hotel-pool or hotel-operated rental language. Because STR permission is not established, the hotel-pool feature must also be false.
The remarks provide no evidence of a mandatory rental-pool requirement. Since STR permission is not established, mandatory hotel-pool participation must be false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks were searched for leasehold, ground lease, lease expiry, expiration, and renewal language. No specific lease-expiration year was provided, so the value remains unknown.
The remarks repeatedly and directly confirm VA approval, including multiple listings for remodeled units and a 3-bedroom unit. This is strong, consistent evidence that financing with a VA loan is permitted.
Multiple listings explicitly describe the property as "fully hurricane insured" and "100% hurricane insured." These repeated statements strongly support that the building is fully insured by the HOA.
No analysis available
The remarks were searched for fire/life safety evaluation language, including "FLSE passed," "fire safety certified," "life safety compliant," and "passed fire inspection." No such statements were found, so there is no public-remarks evidence that the evaluation passed.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Ocean views are strongly supported across the listing set: 14/20 current listings contain OCEAN, with remarks including “stunning ocean and city views,” “peek-a-boo ocean views,” “blue Pacific Ocean,” and “ocean and sunset views.” Evidence appears across multiple listings and agents, confirming that the building offers units with ocean views.
Remarks for at least one (likely more) units specifically call out a 'partial mountain view', and the hillside Makakilo location makes mauka-facing views plausible. While fewer listings mention mountains than ocean, the explicit 'partial mountain view' language indicates the building offers units with mountain views. Buyers seeking mountain outlooks would reasonably include this building in their search.
Multiple current listings confirm Diamond Head views for some units in the building. The remarks include direct phrases like 'Diamond Head and ocean views' and 'Spectacular views of Diamond Head through the blue Pacific Ocean,' giving strong building-level evidence that some units have this view.
City views are supported by 6/20 current listings and explicit remarks such as “stunning ocean and city views” and “stunning ocean and city views” in multiple listings. Although not every unit has this outlook, the repeated building-level evidence confirms that buyers seeking city views may find qualifying units here.
Coastline views are supported by 8/20 current listings, including explicit phrases such as “breathtaking views of Diamond Head and the Ewa Beach coastline” and “views of Diamond Head through the blue Pacific Ocean of the Leeward Coast.” The evidence occurs in multiple remarks and confirms that the building offers units with coastline views.
Limited evidence for garden views: 1 of 20 current MLS view_descriptions lists GARDEN, but none of the public remarks mention 'garden view', 'courtyard view', or 'landscaped view'. This suggests a possible isolated checkbox entry by an agent; include the feature for buyers but with low confidence until corroborated.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across roughly 20 remark sets, agents frequently highlight 'ocean and sunset views' and other outlooks but never mention sunrise, morning sun, or eastern exposure. With only 1/20 MLS view_descriptions tagging SUNRIS and zero textual support, sunrise views appear not to be a notable or reliable feature of this building. It is therefore unlikely that buyers specifically seeking sunrise views would target this property based on its typical orientation and marketing.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The resident manager feature is supported by 18 of 20 current MLS listings marking RESMAN, indicating strong consistency across listings. None of the provided public remarks explicitly mention a resident manager, on-site manager, or live-in manager, but the lack of remark references does not outweigh the strong historical and current MLS evidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.