Palehua Villas
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Palehua Villas
Building Overview
Palehua Villas in Makakilo-Kapolei-Honokai Hale; concrete building (1987) offering ocean and mountain views, resident manager on site.
About Palehua Villas
Based on MLS data, Palehua Villas is a concrete residential building located in the Makakilo-Kapolei-Honokai Hale neighborhood. The building was constructed in 1987. Size and unit count are not specified in the available records.
Key features listed in MLS records include ocean and mountain views and a resident manager. The management company is noted as unknown in the available data. Pets and short-term rentals are not permitted according to the provided information.
Assigned parking is available. Other fees, maintenance assessments, and detailed building rules are not specified in the MLS data. Buyers should verify all details, including management contact, exact unit sizes, fees, and policies, with their agent or the seller prior to making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit owner-occupancy percentages or qualitative descriptions such as "80% owner occupied" or "majority owner occupied." The remarks do not provide any owner-occupancy information, so the percentage remains unknown.
I searched the remarks for explicit elevator references such as "elevators," "four elevators," "multiple elevators," or similar language and found none. The listings discuss unit features, parking, views, and location, but do not mention building elevators.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The MLS checkbox data is highly consistent, with 18 of 20 recent listings including OTCOEX, indicating common-area electricity is part of the maintenance fee. Public remarks do not directly mention it, but there is no evidence of a change or correction, so this appears to be a stable building-level inclusion.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No recent MLS listings include HOTWAT, and the strong presence of WTRHTR is a direct indicator that units have their own water heaters instead of shared hot water service. Several remarks reinforce this by calling out a 'new water heater,' so the evidence consistently points to hot water not being included.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The MLS data strongly supports sewer inclusion, with 18 of 20 listings checking SEWER. At least one public remark explicitly says maintenance fees 'include water, sewer and building maintenance,' which confirms the checkbox data rather than suggesting a copy-paste error.
Water inclusion is supported by both the MLS history and the remarks. The MLS checkbox appears in 18 of 20 listings, and one remark clearly states fees 'include water, sewer and building maintenance,' making this a high-confidence building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No public remarks (0 of ~30 concatenated listings provided) mention 'car wash', 'auto wash', or similar. Although 11/20 MLS records currently have the CRWSH amenity checked, historical analysis showed high confidence that the building does not offer a car wash and the listing remarks contain no supporting language. The discrepancy appears to be inconsistent checkbox usage by agents rather than actual new building amenities, so car_wash is reported as false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
In-unit laundry is strongly confirmed for this building. Multiple public remarks explicitly say things like “in-unit washer and dryer,” “washer + dryer in-unit,” “front load washer/dryer of your own,” and “stacked washer/dryer in the unit.” The evidence appears consistent across many different listings and agents, not just a single copy-paste remark.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Parking is clearly available in this building. Across the current remarks, dozens of listings mention parking directly, most commonly '2 parking stalls,' along with references to parking stalls close to the unit, open parking, and ample nearby parking. The evidence is strong and consistent across multiple agents, not just copy-paste MLS checkboxes.
Assigned parking is strongly supported for this building. Many public remarks explicitly use phrases like 'assigned parking stalls,' '2 assigned parking spots,' 'designated parking stall,' and 'conveniently assigned parking stalls in front of unit.' The remarks align well with the MLS checkbox data, indicating this is a real and typical building feature.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit wording like deeded parking, owned stall, or parking included in deed. The listings only describe assigned/designated stalls, which does not confirm deeded ownership, so this remains unsupported.
No analysis available
I searched for parking fee language such as monthly parking cost, rental charge, or additional parking expense. The remarks do not provide any parking fee amount, so it remains unknown.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for references to a parking waitlist, waiting list, or instructions to join a parking queue. None were found in the public remarks, so there is no evidence that a waitlist system exists.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There are no public remarks across the provided listings that describe the building as concrete. With only 9 of 20 recent MLS records showing CONCRE and no corroborating agent remarks, the evidence is weak and looks more like unchecked MLS copying than confirmed building construction.
Double-wall construction (DOUWAL) appears in 12 of 20 recent MLS entries for this building, making it the most commonly selected construction type code. Public remarks do not address wall construction directly, but the consistency of MLS data across many listings supports that the building uses double-wall construction. This pattern across multiple agents and listings reinforces the likelihood that double-wall construction is accurate.
Only 1 of 20 current MLS listings shows HOLTIL (hollow tile) in construction materials. None of the public remarks mention 'hollow tile'—they reference floor tile and wood-look tile but not hollow-tile construction—so evidence for hollow-tile construction is minimal and uncertain across agents.
MLS checkbox data shows masonry/stucco construction in 10 of 20 recent listings ('MASSTU' selected), but none of the public remarks explicitly reference 'masonry' or 'stucco'. This yields moderate confidence based on checkbox prevalence across listings rather than corroborating agent narrative.
No analysis available
None of the listings mention slab construction, and the sparse MLS checkbox presence does not provide enough evidence to confirm it. This appears to be an unverified MLS attribute rather than a feature confirmed by remarks or multiple agents.
No analysis available
No analysis available
A smaller subset of listings (2 of 20) mark ABOGRO in the construction_materials field, indicating above-ground construction. This field is less frequently used and not discussed in remarks, so the evidence is weaker and likely reflects under-reporting rather than absence. Given the positive MLS indications and no contradictory data, above-ground construction is treated as present but with moderate confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for explicit short-term rental language, including STR permitted, legal vacation rental, NUC, and TVU references. The remarks instead describe the property as investor-friendly or rental-friendly, which is not the same as short-term rental permission, so STR is not established.
I looked for hotel rental pool references such as hotel-managed, Hilton/Trump/Ritz pool, or rental program language. None were found, and because STR is not shown as allowed, this must be false.
I searched for language indicating a required rental program, mandatory hotel pool participation, or inability to opt out. No such evidence appears in the public remarks, and STR is not supported, so this is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for leasehold language such as lease expiry years, ground lease end dates, renewals, and similar terms. None were found in the public remarks, so the lease expiry year cannot be determined from this data.
Public remarks repeatedly state that the building or units are VA approved, which supports VA financing acceptance. This is explicit across several listings, so confidence is very high.
The remarks explicitly state the building is "fully hurricane insured" and "100% hurricane insured," which is strong evidence that the HOA provides full insurance coverage. While the wording focuses on hurricane insurance rather than the exact term walls-in coverage, it clearly indicates the property is fully insured in the public remarks.
No analysis available
I looked for fire/life safety evaluation language such as FLSE passed, fire safety certified, life safety compliant, or passed fire inspection. None of the public remarks mention any such certification or inspection result.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Strong evidence across numerous listings that this building offers ocean views. At least 10+ remarks explicitly reference 'ocean views,' 'Pacific Ocean,' 'peek-a-boo ocean views,' or similar phrasing, indicating this is not a one-off agent error. The consistency across multiple listings supports a building-level feature rather than a copy-paste mistake.
Remarks for at least one (likely more) units specifically call out a 'partial mountain view', and the hillside Makakilo location makes mauka-facing views plausible. While fewer listings mention mountains than ocean, the explicit 'partial mountain view' language indicates the building offers units with mountain views. Buyers seeking mountain outlooks would reasonably include this building in their search.
Multiple current listings confirm Diamond Head views for some units in the building. The remarks include direct phrases like 'Diamond Head and ocean views' and 'Spectacular views of Diamond Head,' which aligns with the prior high-confidence data. This appears to be a genuine building-level view option rather than MLS checkbox noise.
No analysis available
There are several remarks supporting coastline views, with at least a few explicitly naming 'the Ewa Beach coastline' and related coastal-facing outlooks. The evidence is somewhat less frequent than ocean views but still consistent across multiple listings. This supports including coastline view as an available building feature.
Limited evidence for garden views: 1 of 20 current MLS view_descriptions lists GARDEN, but none of the public remarks mention 'garden view', 'courtyard view', or 'landscaped view'. This suggests a possible isolated checkbox entry by an agent; include the feature for buyers but with low confidence until corroborated.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across roughly 20 remark sets, agents frequently highlight 'ocean and sunset views' and other outlooks but never mention sunrise, morning sun, or eastern exposure. With only 1/20 MLS view_descriptions tagging SUNRIS and zero textual support, sunrise views appear not to be a notable or reliable feature of this building. It is therefore unlikely that buyers specifically seeking sunrise views would target this property based on its typical orientation and marketing.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The resident manager feature appears in the MLS amenity data for 18 of 20 current listings, indicating this building is typically marketed as having an on-site/resident manager. Public remarks across the listings do not explicitly reference a manager, so this is driven primarily by the consistent MLS checkbox rather than agent remarks. Given the high current listing rate and no contradictory remarks, this is a high-confidence building amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.