Palehua Townhouses 2
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Palehua Townhouses 2
Building Overview
Palehua Townhouses 2 in Makakilo-Kapolei-Honokai Hale — built 1976; pets and short-term rentals are not allowed.
About Palehua Townhouses 2
Palehua Townhouses 2 is located in the Makakilo-Kapolei-Honokai Hale neighborhood. According to available records, the community was built in 1976. MLS-sourced data for unit sizes and construction type are not provided in the available listings and therefore are not included here.
Based on MLS data, key policies for the building include no pets allowed and no short-term rentals permitted. The management company is listed as unknown in MLS records. There is no MLS-provided information on on-site amenities, common areas, or HOA services for this community in the data reviewed.
Additional details such as parking arrangements, association fees, exact unit square footage, and other building rules were not available in the MLS data supplied. Buyers and agents should verify parking, fee and management details, and any other material facts with the listing agent or the association. This summary is based on MLS data and should be independently confirmed.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks were searched for an owner-occupancy percentage and phrases such as "80% owner occupied," "majority owner occupied," and "highly owner occupied." No owner-occupancy information was found, so the percentage remains unknown.
The remarks were searched for explicit elevator counts or phrases such as "4 elevators," "four elevators," or "multiple elevators." No elevator information was found, and the building context does not provide a reliable basis to estimate the number.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Common-area electricity appears to be included in the maintenance/association fee. Current MLS data shows 13 of 20 listings with OTCOEX, which is a strong signal for a shared building expense. The public remarks do not directly mention it, but the checkbox pattern is consistent enough to treat this as included.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Hot water does not appear to be a stable included expense for this building. Only 1 of 20 current MLS listings shows HOTWAT, while most show WTRHTR, which is a strong indicator that units have their own water heaters instead of shared hot water service. The remarks are silent on hot water inclusion, so the MLS pattern points to false for this feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer is very likely included in the association fee. Current MLS data shows 18 of 20 listings with SEWER, making this one of the most consistent included expenses across the building. The remarks do not mention sewer directly, but the MLS evidence is overwhelming.
Water is clearly included in the association fee. All 20 of 20 current MLS listings show WATER in association_fee_includes, which is as strong as this evidence can get. The public remarks are consistent with a standard HOA-included utility setup and do not suggest any exception.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong building-level evidence for patio/deck-style outdoor space. At least a dozen current listings mention a lanai, covered lanai, private lanai, deck, or outdoor space, which is consistent with the prior high-confidence MLS history. The wording appears across multiple agents rather than a single copy-paste source, so this feature should remain included.
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is strong building-level evidence for private yard space. Several listings explicitly mention a 'private yard,' 'fenced back yard,' 'fully fenced in courtyard/yard/garden,' and other enclosed outdoor areas, suggesting this is a real and recurring feature rather than an MLS checkbox error. Current MLS data shows the feature in 3/20 listings, and the remarks support that it is available in at least some units.
No analysis available
Multiple agent remarks confirm shared recreation facilities: at least 8 listings mention "community pool", "playground(s)", "recreational area", or "Kanehoa Recreation Center" (quotes: "community pool, two playgrounds, and a recreational area", "part of the Palehua Association and Kanehoa Recreation Center", "association pool"). MLS checkbox for RECARE appears in 4/20 listings, but widespread independent remarks across many listings and prior high-confidence data indicate the building does offer a recreation area.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage is strongly supported across the remarks, appearing in well over 10 listings. Agents independently describe "lots of storage space," "storage closet in front lanai," "abundant storage throughout," and "secured storage," which is consistent with the prior MLS data showing storage in both amenities and unit features. The evidence is strong and recurring, not isolated to a single listing.
The remarks directly confirm surfboard storage in an exterior storage area associated with a unit. Although described as unit-associated rather than a clearly shared facility, this is explicit evidence of surfboard storage.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Pool is strongly supported across the listing remarks and aligns with the current MLS amenities data. At least 8 listings explicitly mention a pool, using phrases like 'community pool,' 'association pool,' and 'swimming pool,' which suggests this is a real shared building/community amenity rather than copy-paste noise. The evidence is consistent across multiple agents and listing types.
No analysis available
Multiple listings confirm access to a community pool. No public remark identifies the pool as saltwater or otherwise specifies its water treatment.
In-unit laundry is strongly supported across this building. Multiple current listings explicitly mention "washer and dryer," "laundry area," or a "separate laundry room," and the MLS history shows 18 of 20 listings including washer/dryer in inclusions. The evidence is consistent across multiple agents and appears to be a real building feature, not just copy-paste noise.
No analysis available
Several listings mention private washers, dryers, or laundry areas within the units. No remarks indicate that community laundry exists or requires payment.
The remarks mention individual laundry areas, washers, and dryers inside some townhomes. They do not describe shared community laundry facilities available on every floor.
Parking is clearly available for this building. Across many current remarks, agents mention parking in nearly every listing, with explicit details like "one assigned parking stall," "two assigned parking stalls," "2 open parking stalls," and "2 parking spaces." The evidence is strong and consistent across multiple listings, not just a single agent or copy-paste remark.
Assigned parking is well-supported for this building. Multiple current remarks explicitly use assigned/reserved language, with several listings stating 'one assigned parking stall,' 'two assigned parking stalls,' and 'two designated parking spaces right in front of the unit.' The evidence is consistent across multiple agents and aligns with the current MLS checkbox data.
No analysis available
Multiple listings confirm that units have assigned or designated parking spaces. Assigned parking does not establish deeded ownership, and no explicit deeded-parking language was found.
No analysis available
The remarks describe assigned, open, and designated parking but provide no parking-fee information. Association and recreation fees mentioned in some listings are not identified as parking fees.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks were searched for parking waitlist language. Although parking availability is discussed repeatedly, no building parking waitlist system was described.
No analysis available
The remarks mention secured storage in some units, but that is not evidence of a building card-access security system. No card or fob access system is described.
No analysis available
One listing mentions an on-site resident manager, consistent with the building context. The remarks do not describe any security patrol service.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The building appears to offer split AC in at least some units. I found 2 explicit remarks: one says "split AC system" and another notes "window A/C units in each bedroom," alongside MLS data where 3 of 20 current listings have ACSPL included. This looks like a real building-level feature rather than a copy-paste anomaly, though it may only apply to select units.
Window AC is supported by direct remarks in multiple listings, including 'window A/C units in each bedroom' and 'replaced window AC Units.' This appears across several agents/listings rather than a single isolated mention, and the current MLS inclusions also show ACWIUN in 9/20 listings. Confidence is very high that some units in this building have window air conditioning.
7 of 20 current MLS listings include CONCRE in construction_materials, but none of the provided public remarks mention 'concrete' or 'reinforced concrete.' Evidence comes primarily from MLS checkbox data and is moderately strong, though remarks suggest possible agent checkbox copy/paste so confidence is limited.
Double wall construction is checked in 14 of 20 listings, which is fairly consistent across the building. The public remarks do not mention "double wall," "double-wall construction," or "two walls," so the evidence is MLS-driven rather than confirmed by agent remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Concrete slab foundation appears in only 6 of 20 MLS listings, making this the weakest of the three features. No public remarks mention a slab foundation, so this looks like partial MLS support without corroborating narrative evidence.
No analysis available
Wood frame construction appears in 13 of 20 current MLS listings, suggesting it is a recurring building-level material rather than a one-off unit detail. No public remarks explicitly call out "wood frame" or similar phrasing, so this is supported primarily by the MLS checkbox pattern and may reflect copied listing data.
Above-ground construction appears in 7 of 20 current MLS listings, but none of the public remarks mention 'above ground construction,' 'above ground building,' or similar language. That makes this a weaker building-level signal, with the MLS entries looking more like inconsistent checkbox data than remark-confirmed evidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The listings provide no positive evidence that short-term rentals are permitted. No explicit prohibition such as a 30-day minimum is stated either, so this remains a low-to-moderate confidence negative determination based on the absence of qualifying STR language.
The remarks mention association or community swimming pools, playgrounds, and recreation areas, but none describes a hotel rental pool. Because short-term-rental permission is not supported, this feature must also be false.
The remarks contain no requirement for units to participate in a rental program and no hotel pool is identified. Since short-term rentals and hotel-pool participation are not supported, mandatory participation is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks were searched for leasehold and ground-lease language, including expiration and renewal dates. No applicable four-digit lease-expiry year was found.
The remarks repeatedly and directly support VA financing and assumable VA loans. This is consistent across multiple listings, providing very high confidence that the building is VA financing eligible.
The remarks were searched for fully insured, full insurance, comprehensive building insurance, and walls-in coverage. No HOA insurance coverage language was found.
No analysis available
The remarks were searched for fire/life-safety evaluation approval, FLSE passage, fire-safety certification, life-safety compliance, and passed fire inspections. None of these terms or equivalent statements were found.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Ocean views are clearly supported by many separate listings, with well over 10 remarks referencing them and multiple explicit phrases such as "OCEAN VIEWS," "ocean vistas," and "peek-a-boo ocean views." The consistency across multiple agents suggests this is a real building-level feature, not a copy-paste error.
Mountain views appear in multiple listing remarks across the building, with explicit references like "mountain views" and "sweeping mountain" views. The repeated mentions across different units indicate this is a legitimate building feature available to some buyers.
No analysis available
City views are supported by explicit remark language in at least 1 listing, including 'views of the City of Kapolei.' Current MLS data shows CITY in 3/20 listings, so this appears to be a real building-level feature available in some units rather than copy-paste noise.
Coastline views are mentioned across many remarks, not just one agent: at least 4+ listings reference coastline, shoreline, or ocean-view wording, including phrases like 'island coastline' and 'catch the blues of the coastline between the rooftops.' With COASTL in 6/20 MLS listings, this appears to be a genuine and recurring feature for some units in the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sunset views are strongly supported across multiple listings, with several remarks explicitly stating "sunset views," "sunset vistas," and "evening sunsets." The evidence appears consistent across different agents and units, and it is reinforced by current MLS view descriptions showing sunset on multiple listings. This should be treated as a genuine feature available in the building, at least for some units.
No analysis available
The remarks describe ocean, mountain, sunset, coastline, and city views from units and lanais. None specifically state that Friday night fireworks can be viewed from the building.
No analysis available
Resident manager is supported by both historical MLS data and current public remarks. One listing explicitly says residents enjoy amenities including "an on-site resident manager," which aligns with the prior high-confidence RESMAN flag. The evidence looks consistent rather than like a copy-paste checkbox error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.