Palehua Hillside
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Palehua Hillside
Building Overview
Palehua Hillside in Makakilo-Kapolei-Honokai Hale (1980) — wood frame building with ocean and mountain views, split A/C, covered assigned parking.
About Palehua Hillside
Palehua Hillside is a residential building located in the Makakilo-Kapolei-Honokai Hale neighborhood. According to available records, the building was constructed in 1980 and is of wood frame construction. Size and unit mix are not specified in the MLS data provided.
Based on MLS data, units in Palehua Hillside offer ocean and mountain views and are equipped with split air conditioning. The property does not allow pets and short-term rentals are not permitted. The listed management company is unknown in the available records.
Additional details from the MLS indicate covered, assigned parking for residents. No HOA fees, maintenance details, or other amenities were provided in the data. Buyers should verify all building features, rules, and fee information with the listing agent or management, as this summary is based solely on MLS data.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit owner-occupancy language, including percentages and qualitative phrases like 'majority owner occupied.' The remarks do not provide any occupancy breakdown. Since there is no stated percentage, I cannot estimate this value from the listings.
I searched the public remarks for explicit elevator references, including counts like '4 elevators' or wording such as 'multiple elevators.' Nothing in the listings indicates whether this townhome community has elevators. Given the split-level, low-rise townhouse style, an elevator would be unusual, but I am not inferring one without direct evidence.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
Cable TV appears in only 1 of 20 recent MLS listings via CABTV, which is too sparse to be a strong building-level pattern. No current remarks mention cable included in fees, so this remains a low-confidence inclusion based primarily on MLS checkbox data.
Common area electricity is supported by a strong MLS pattern, with 17 of 20 recent listings including OTCOEX. This is consistent across multiple listings and appears to be a building-level HOA inclusion rather than a one-off agent entry.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Most listings indicate individual water heater systems (WTRHTR), and one remarks on '49 gallon and 80 gallon separate solar panel powered water tanks,' implying unit-supplied hot water. With only 2 of 20 listings checking HOTWAT in the fee includes, hot water being an HOA-included utility is very unlikely and those checkboxes are likely agent error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer is included in association fees for this building, with current MLS data showing 19 of 20 recent listings marked that way. No public remarks mention a change or dispute this, so the signal remains very strong and consistent across listings.
Water is included in association fees for this building, with current MLS data showing 19 of 20 recent listings marked that way. The public remarks do not suggest any change, so this remains a strong building-level feature with consistent MLS support.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The only evidence for car wash is the MLS amenity code (CRWSH) appearing in 9/20 listings. None of the remarks reference a car wash, auto wash, or vehicle wash area, so the support appears to come from MLS data rather than agent descriptions. This suggests the amenity may exist, but the evidence is not strong across remarks and could reflect copy-paste MLS input.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings explicitly mention outdoor living features — phrases include “covered lanai,” “covered patio,” “newly built deck,” and “back lanai.” These remarks appear across the majority of unit listings (at least 15 of 20 excerpts) and confirm the historical MLS checkbox data, indicating building/units offer patios/decks as a common amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Numerous listings explicitly state private outdoor space — frequent phrases include “private fenced-in yard,” “wrap-around yard,” and “front and back private fenced yards.” These explicit remarks appear across the majority of unit listings (at least 16 of 20 excerpts), supporting the MLS indicators that many units in the building have private yards.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage is strongly supported by both MLS history and current listing remarks. Multiple listings mention "ample indoor storage," "outdoor storage," "2-outdoor storage sheds," and "storage space," indicating this is a recurring building/unit feature rather than a one-off copy-paste error. The evidence is consistent across several agents and recent remarks, so buyers searching for storage should consider this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
In-unit laundry is very strongly supported across the listings: at least 8-10 remarks explicitly mention it, with phrases like "side-by-side, full-size washer and dryer," "stackable W/D," and "washer and dryer in unit." The pattern appears consistent across multiple agents and listing styles, so this is not likely to be copy-paste noise.
There is no remark-level evidence for a shared laundry room, coin laundry, or laundry facilities anywhere in the provided listings. Since nearly all laundry references are to in-unit washers/dryers, the community_laundry feature appears unsupported and likely unchecked correctly or intermittently mis-entered in MLS.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Parking is clearly available for this building. Multiple listings mention “2 assigned parking stalls,” “2 convenient parking spaces,” “one covered parking space, one open parking space,” and “available street parking for guests,” which strongly confirms building-level parking access across many agents. The evidence is consistent and not limited to a single remark, so this appears well established.
Assigned parking is strongly supported by both MLS data and remarks. Multiple listings explicitly state “2 assigned covered parking stalls,” “two assigned parking stalls,” and “2 assigned parking spaces,” which looks consistent across different agents rather than a one-off copy/paste error.
Covered parking is extremely well documented for this building. Numerous remarks from different listings explicitly mention “2 assigned covered parking stalls,” “2 cov’d side-by-side parking stalls,” and “two covered parking stalls,” making this a strong building-level feature rather than a copy-paste anomaly. The current remarks align with the historical MLS data, so confidence is very high.
The listings consistently say the unit has assigned/covered parking stalls or designated parking spaces. I did not find language indicating deeded, owned, or included-with-title parking, so this appears to be non-deeded parking.
No analysis available
I looked for any mention of parking fees, rental charges, or monthly parking costs, but the remarks only describe assigned, covered, or available street parking. There is no evidence of a separate parking fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for wording such as parking waitlist, waiting list, or joining a list for parking and found nothing. The listings present parking as available with assigned stalls rather than constrained by a waitlist.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
At least one listing’s remarks clearly advertise the home as having “w/split A/C,” confirming the presence of ductless mini-split AC in the building. In addition, 2 of 20 current MLS entries include the ACSPL checkbox, suggesting multiple units have this feature. Together, this supports that some units in the building offer split AC, so buyers seeking this amenity should consider this property.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Double-wall construction appears in 13 of 20 recent MLS listings, giving moderate support. None of the public remarks explicitly say 'double wall' or otherwise contradict it, so this is likely an MLS-consistent building feature rather than a copy-paste anomaly. Confidence is moderate because there is no direct remark confirmation.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Concrete slab foundation is shown in 11 of 20 listings, which supports inclusion at a moderate level. The public remarks do not describe the foundation, but there is also no evidence that the slab designation is incorrect. This appears to be a building-level MLS pattern with only moderate confidence.
No analysis available
Wood frame construction is strongly supported by the MLS pattern, with 18 of 20 listings indicating WOOFRA. The public remarks across multiple listings do not explicitly mention construction, and none dispute wood-frame construction. This looks like a stable building-level attribute rather than a one-off agent entry.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for explicit short-term rental language such as STR permitted, legal vacation rental, NUC, TVU, or owner-use exceptions, but found none. Based on the absence of any supportive STR wording in the remarks, short-term rentals are not evidenced here.
I searched for hotel pool or managed rental-program references such as Hilton/Trump/Ritz pool and found none. Since there is no evidence that STR is allowed, hotel-pool participation is also false.
I looked for language indicating a mandatory hotel pool or required rental participation and found nothing. Because there is no evidence of STR allowance and no rental-program language, mandatory pool participation is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for leasehold language such as lease expires, ground lease, leasehold, renewed through, and specific expiration years, but found none. There is no public evidence in these remarks to identify a lease expiry year.
The remarks repeatedly reference VA assumable loans and VA buyers, which is strong public evidence that VA financing is available for this building. This is consistent across multiple listings and is not just a one-off mention.
I searched the remarks for HOA insurance wording such as 'fully insured,' 'full insurance,' or 'walls-in coverage.' There are no references to the building being fully insured in the public remarks. This feature cannot be verified from the provided listings.
No analysis available
I looked for public-remark language indicating a fire/life safety evaluation pass or fire inspection compliance. The listings do not mention FLSE, fire safety certification, or life-safety compliance. With no direct evidence in the remarks, this remains unconfirmed.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Ocean views are clearly advertised across several listings for this building, with multiple agents using explicit phrases like “ocean views,” “view of the ocean,” and “panoramic ocean views.” This is consistent with the prior high-confidence assessment and does not look like a one-off copy-paste error.
While no remark literally says “mountain view,” the complex is described as in upper Makakilo’s hills with “Mountain hospitality,” “fresh mountain breeze,” and “breathtaking views that Makakilo is renowned for.” Combined with 1/20 MLS listings checking a MOUNTA view, this suggests at least some units have mountain or mauka-facing views. The evidence is implied rather than explicit, so confidence is moderate rather than high.
No analysis available
City views are directly referenced in multiple remarks, including explicit mentions of “the city lights” and a “picturesque view of Diamond Head and of the city.” The repeated phrasing across listings supports that city-view units are genuinely available in this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across the reviewed listings, sunset views are not supported by the remarks. No agent description clearly says "sunset," "evening sun," or "western exposure"; references are limited to generic view language like Diamond Head, city lights, ocean views, and panoramic views. With only 1/20 MLS view descriptions showing SUNSET and the rest showing NONE or unrelated views, the evidence leans against this being a reliable building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
MLS data indicates the resident manager amenity is checked on 7 of 20 listings for this building, and historical records previously flagged this feature. However, none of the current public remarks mention a resident manager, on-site manager, or live-in building manager; the checkbox appears inconsistently applied across agents, so the feature is retained with moderate confidence (0.72) rather than confirmed.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.