Palehua Hillside
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Palehua Hillside
Building Overview
Palehua Hillside in Makakilo-Kapolei-Honokai Hale (1980) — wood frame building with ocean and mountain views, split A/C, covered assigned parking.
About Palehua Hillside
Palehua Hillside is a residential building located in the Makakilo-Kapolei-Honokai Hale neighborhood. According to available records, the building was constructed in 1980 and is of wood frame construction. Size and unit mix are not specified in the MLS data provided.
Based on MLS data, units in Palehua Hillside offer ocean and mountain views and are equipped with split air conditioning. The property does not allow pets and short-term rentals are not permitted. The listed management company is unknown in the available records.
Additional details from the MLS indicate covered, assigned parking for residents. No HOA fees, maintenance details, or other amenities were provided in the data. Buyers should verify all building features, rules, and fee information with the listing agent or management, as this summary is based solely on MLS data.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for owner-occupancy language (e.g., '80% owner occupied', 'majority owner occupied', 'owner occupied') and found no statements about the percentage of owner-occupied units. Without an explicit numeric mention, the owner-occupancy percentage cannot be determined and remains unknown.
I searched all public remarks for explicit elevator references (e.g., 'elevator', '4 elevators', 'four elevators', 'multiple elevators') and found none. Because there is no explicit numeric statement and numeric fields must not be guessed without evidence, the number of elevators remains unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
17 of 20 recent MLS listings include OTCOEX (common area electricity) in association_fee_includes, a strong, building-level pattern across multiple agents. Public remarks for the sampled unit do not explicitly reference HOA-covered common electricity but contain no contradiction; evidence is strong and consistent in MLS checkbox data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Most listings indicate individual water heater systems (WTRHTR), and one remarks on '49 gallon and 80 gallon separate solar panel powered water tanks,' implying unit-supplied hot water. With only 2 of 20 listings checking HOTWAT in the fee includes, hot water being an HOA-included utility is very unlikely and those checkboxes are likely agent error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
19 of 20 recent MLS listings include SEWER in association_fee_includes, indicating sewer is very likely included in the HOA/association fees for the building. The public remarks reviewed do not explicitly state this but also do not contradict the MLS checkbox pattern; the MLS evidence is strong and consistent.
19 of 20 recent MLS listings include WATER in association_fee_includes, a strong indicator that water is included in the HOA/association fees for the building. Public remarks do reference water systems (e.g., solar water tanks) but do not explicitly state fee coverage; MLS checkbox data is consistent and strong.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
8 of 20 current MLS listings (40%) list CRWSH in amenities, but across the provided public remarks there are no references to a car wash, auto wash, or vehicle wash area. Because the feature appears only in checkbox data with no corroborating remarks or owner verification, the evidence is weak and may be due to agents copying checklist items rather than an actual building facility.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings explicitly mention outdoor living features — phrases include “covered lanai,” “covered patio,” “newly built deck,” and “back lanai.” These remarks appear across the majority of unit listings (at least 15 of 20 excerpts) and confirm the historical MLS checkbox data, indicating building/units offer patios/decks as a common amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Numerous listings explicitly state private outdoor space — frequent phrases include “private fenced-in yard,” “wrap-around yard,” and “front and back private fenced yards.” These explicit remarks appear across the majority of unit listings (at least 16 of 20 excerpts), supporting the MLS indicators that many units in the building have private yards.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
High historical confidence: 14/20 listings previously flagged STORAG in unit_features and 2/20 in building amenities. Current remarks across multiple listings explicitly reference storage amenities, including "2-outdoor storage sheds", "spacious attic with pull-down access", and several notes of "ample indoor and outdoor storage" or "ample storage space." Evidence is consistent across multiple agent remarks and aligns with prior MLS checkbox data, indicating the building offers extra storage/lockers to residents.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings explicitly describe in-unit laundry, including phrases like 'indoor laundry, side-by-side full-size W/D', 'dedicated laundry room with half bath', and 'washer and dryer in unit', and others reference laundry areas on specific floors. Combined with 19 of 20 current MLS entries including washer/dryer in the inclusions, this strongly indicates that Palehua Hillside offers units with in‑unit washer and dryer. Buyers seeking in‑unit laundry should consider this building as it commonly provides that feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence that the building offers assigned parking: 14 of 20 MLS parking_features include ASSIGN and numerous remarks explicitly state assigned stalls (e.g., '2 assigned covered parking stalls', 'two assigned parking stalls', 'the convenience of 2 assigned parking spaces'). Mentions appear across multiple agent remarks (not limited to a single listing), indicating this is a recurring, building-level feature rather than an isolated copy/paste error.
Very strong and consistent evidence that the building provides covered parking: 20 of 20 MLS parking_features denote covered parking and many remarks state phrases like 'two covered parking stalls', '2 cov’d side-by-side parking stalls', and 'covered side-by-side parking stalls'. This coverage appears repeatedly across multiple listings and agents.
Parking is consistently described as assigned/covered stalls in the remarks, not explicitly as deeded/owned. Because 'deeded' is never stated, we mark deeded parking as false with low confidence.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for 'monthly parking fee', 'parking charge', or similar language and found none. Since there is no explicit parking fee referenced, the monthly parking fee is unknown from these remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for 'parking waitlist', 'join waitlist', or similar wording but found no such language. The remarks consistently describe assigned stalls and guest street parking, so there's no evidence of a waitlist.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
At least one listing’s remarks clearly advertise the home as having “w/split A/C,” confirming the presence of ductless mini-split AC in the building. In addition, 2 of 20 current MLS entries include the ACSPL checkbox, suggesting multiple units have this feature. Together, this supports that some units in the building offer split AC, so buyers seeking this amenity should consider this property.
No analysis available
No analysis available
14 of 20 recent MLS listings include double-wall construction (DOUWAL). Although public remarks do not mention 'double wall' or similar phrases and agent copy/paste is possible, the majority of MLS entries indicate the building offers double-wall construction, giving moderate support for inclusion.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
10 of 20 recent MLS listings identify a concrete slab foundation (SLAB). Public remarks do not describe foundation type; given the moderate number of MLS entries marking SLAB and absence of contradictory remarks, there is moderate support to include slab foundation as a building feature.
No analysis available
17 of 20 recent MLS listings mark the building as wood frame (WOOFRA). Public remarks across listings do not explicitly state construction type, but the high and consistent MLS tagging from multiple listings/agents indicates strong evidence the building is wood frame.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for 'short-term rental', 'vacation rental', 'STR', 'NUC', 'TVU', or minimum-night allowances and found none. Absence of any STR language across many listings suggests STRs are not allowed or not promoted; therefore marked false with medium confidence.
Given the explicit residential townhome context and lack of any 'hotel rental pool' or 'managed by hotel' language, hotel pool participation is not present. Because STR is also not allowed, this must be false.
There is no evidence of a required or mandatory rental/hotel pool; listings emphasize owner use and typical HOA operations. As STRs are not indicated, a mandatory pool is not applicable and is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for phrases like 'lease expires', 'land lease to', 'leasehold', or a 4-digit expiry year but found none. Without explicit leasehold language or a year, the lease expiry is unknown.
Several listings explicitly mention assumable VA loans and availability to qualified VA buyers, indicating the property/units are tied to VA financing eligibility. This is direct evidence from the public remarks.
I searched the remarks for insurance-related language such as 'fully insured', 'walls-in coverage', 'full insurance', or 'comprehensive building insurance' and found no references. Because the listings do not state the HOA provides full/walls-in insurance, this is set to false with medium confidence.
No analysis available
I searched remarks for terms like 'fire life safety evaluation passed', 'FLSE passed', 'fire safety certified', or 'passed fire inspection' and found no references. With no explicit statement in the public remarks, this is set to false with medium confidence (absence of mention suggests it was not marketed as passed).
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Ocean views are clearly advertised in several different listings, with phrases like “primary suite… showcasing ocean views” and “private balcony with views of the ocean and Makakilo Park.” Current MLS data (2/20 listings marked OCEAN, despite 6/20 marked NONE) supports that only some units have this view, but confirms the building offers ocean-view homes. This is consistent with the building’s hillside Makakilo location and remarks about panoramic ocean views.
While no remark literally says “mountain view,” the complex is described as in upper Makakilo’s hills with “Mountain hospitality,” “fresh mountain breeze,” and “breathtaking views that Makakilo is renowned for.” Combined with 1/20 MLS listings checking a MOUNTA view, this suggests at least some units have mountain or mauka-facing views. The evidence is implied rather than explicit, so confidence is moderate rather than high.
No analysis available
City views are directly mentioned in remarks describing a “picturesque view of Diamond Head and of the city from the primary bedroom,” indicating at least one city-facing unit. This aligns with MLS data showing 1/20 listings with CITY in the view field, even though several others are marked NONE. The evidence supports that buyers seeking city views can find such units in this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Reviewed 20 public remarks: 0/20 explicitly mention 'sunset', 'evening sun', 'western exposure', or similar phrasing. While several listings reference 'ocean views', 'Diamond Head', and 'panoramic views', none call out sunset views; MLS view_descriptions list SUNSET in only 1/20 listings and NONE in 5/20. Given the lack of explicit mentions across multiple agents and few MLS checkboxes, confidence is high that the building should not be labeled as offering sunset views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
MLS data indicates the resident manager amenity is checked on 7 of 20 listings for this building, and historical records previously flagged this feature. However, none of the current public remarks mention a resident manager, on-site manager, or live-in building manager; the checkbox appears inconsistently applied across agents, so the feature is retained with moderate confidence (0.72) rather than confirmed.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.