Pakalana
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Pakalana
Building Overview
Pakalana in Makiki-Tantalus (1976): concrete building with BBQ area and resident manager; covered parking and window AC.
About Pakalana
Pakalana is a concrete residential building located in the Makiki‑Tantalus neighborhood, built in 1976. Specific unit counts and unit sizes are not included in the available data.
Key on-site features include a BBQ area and a resident manager. Units use window air conditioning as the cooling method.
Additional details from available records note covered parking is provided. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed. Management company is listed as unknown in the MLS data. Based on MLS data, prospective buyers should verify all building details, rules, and fees with the listing agent or management prior to purchase.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for numeric owner-occupancy percentages and qualitative descriptions of owner concentration, but found none. Since the remarks do not provide a percentage or a reliable descriptive proxy, the owner-occupancy rate remains unknown from this data.
I found evidence that the building has elevator service, but none of the remarks specify how many elevators there are. I searched for explicit counts like "4 elevators," "four elevators," and similar wording, but no number was mentioned.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is no clear remark support for common area electricity being included in the maintenance fee. In fact, one detailed listing points the other way by noting electrical sub-metering and separate billing, which suggests this is not a building-paid common electricity item.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Gas is strongly supported across the remarks and current MLS data. Several listings explicitly say 'gas stove' or 'gas oven,' which is consistent with the building offering gas service and the association fee including gas.
Hot water appears in the current MLS inclusions for a majority of listings, but the public remarks do not explicitly mention it. Because there is no WTRHTR clue or contradiction, this is a moderate-confidence inclusion based mainly on MLS data.
Internet inclusion is not supported by the public remarks. Only 1 of 19 MLS records includes INTSER, which looks like an outlier rather than a building feature. No remarks mention internet, Wi‑Fi, or any bundled service.
No analysis available
Sewer inclusion is uniformly supported by the MLS data across all listings. The remarks do not provide any contradiction, so this remains a very high-confidence building feature.
Water inclusion is consistently shown in every current MLS record. No remarks suggest otherwise, so this is a very high-confidence building feature.
Multiple listings explicitly reference shared BBQ amenities, e.g., 'guest parking, bbq areas' and 'guest parking and bbq area', indicating building-level barbecue facilities. In addition, 13 of 18 MLS entries have BBQ checked, suggesting consistent agent recognition rather than a one-off error. Evidence from both remarks and MLS checkboxes supports that the building offers common BBQ areas.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for surfboard storage, board storage, surf storage, or bike-and-surfboard storage language and found nothing. The public remarks do not provide evidence that the building has dedicated surfboard storage.
No analysis available
The majority of MLS listings (14 out of 18) indicate a trash chute (TRACHU) in the amenities, and no remarks contradict this. Trash chutes are a common, often unremarked building feature, so their absence from narrative remarks is not unusual. The consistent MLS checkbox data across many listings strongly supports that the building has a trash chute system.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for any mention of a pool, and specifically salt-water pool wording such as saltwater, saline, or salt pool. No such evidence appears in the remarks, so there is no support for a salt pool.
In-unit laundry is very strongly supported. Multiple listings explicitly say "washer and dryer in the unit," "in unit laundry," or "includes your own in-unit washer and dryer," appearing across many separate remarks and not just a single copy-paste phrase. The evidence is consistent with current MLS data showing 18/20 listings include washer/dryer, so this feature should be treated as present for the building.
No analysis available
I looked for public remarks indicating paid community laundry, such as coin laundry, card-operated machines, quarters, or laundry fees, and found nothing. The available remarks focus on in-unit laundry instead.
I searched the public remarks for phrases like "laundry on each floor," "laundry room on every floor," or similar floor-by-floor laundry references and found none. The listings only mention in-unit washer/dryer, which does not support community laundry on every floor.
Parking is clearly supported across the listings: 20/20 current MLS entries include parking-related features. Remarks mention phrases like "one dedicated parking stall," "gated and secured parking," "2 covered, secured parking unit," and "2 tandem parking stalls," showing this is a consistent building-level amenity rather than a one-off note.
Assigned/reserved parking is mentioned in multiple listings, including "1 assigned parking stall," "1 assigned parking space," "reserved parking stall," and "two assigned parking stalls in tandem style." The repeated wording across different remarks supports this as a real building feature, not just copy-paste checkbox noise.
Covered parking is strongly supported across many listings, with roughly 7+ remarks explicitly mentioning covered, secure, or garage-style parking. The evidence appears consistent across multiple agents and is not limited to a single unit, so this building should be treated as offering covered parking.
I looked for phrases like deeded parking, owned stall, or parking included in the deed and found none. The listings consistently use assigned or reserved parking language instead, which suggests the stalls are not deeded.
No analysis available
I searched for parking fee, monthly parking charge, or rental language and found nothing. The remarks discuss lease rent and maintenance fees, but no separate parking cost is stated.
Guest parking is consistently supported by both MLS data and remarks. Multiple listings explicitly say "guest parking is available," "3 guest parking," "guest parking in this building," and "visitors parking," which is strong evidence across several agents.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for any reference to a parking waitlist, joining a list for parking, or limited parking allocation procedures and found none. The listings suggest parking is assigned with the unit rather than managed through a waitlist.
No analysis available
The remarks provide strong evidence of card/fob-based access security. Multiple listings reference key fob entry or fob-secured building access, which clearly supports this feature.
No analysis available
I searched for references to security patrols, roving guards, or a patrolled building, but found none. The remarks mention secured access and an on-site resident manager, which are not the same as security patrol service.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Moderate building-level evidence suggests some units have window A/C: 10 of 19 current MLS listings check ACWIUN. The public remarks do not explicitly say "window AC" or "window air conditioner," and one listing instead mentions split AC, so this looks more like mixed/agent-entered MLS data than a consistently described building feature. Still, because buyers searching for A/C units may find some units here, it should be kept as true with moderate confidence.
All 19 current MLS listings indicate CONCRE in the construction_materials field, making this a highly consistent building-level feature. The public remarks do not explicitly mention concrete, but the MLS data is unanimous, suggesting reliable agent reporting rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence is limited and appears to come from MLS data rather than agent remarks: 4 of 20 listings include ABOGRO, while the public remarks do not mention construction type at all. This is moderate-to-low confidence and could reflect inconsistent agent entry or copy/paste behavior, so it should be treated cautiously.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for short-term rental wording such as STR permitted, vacation rental, NUC, TVU, or a minimum-stay rule and found nothing. Based on the public remarks alone, there is no evidence that short-term rentals are allowed.
I looked for hotel rental pool references such as Hilton/Trump/Ritz pool, hotel-managed language, or a rental program and found none. Since there is no evidence of STR being allowed, this must remain false.
I searched for language indicating owners must participate in a rental pool or cannot opt out, but found none. The listings do not describe any mandatory hotel or rental program.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The public remarks consistently identify this as a leasehold property with the ground lease ending in 2066. Several independent listings repeat the same expiry year, so this is high confidence.
I searched for explicit references to VA approved, VA loans accepted, or VA financing and found none. The remarks mention financing in a general sense, but nothing that ties the building to VA loan approval.
I looked for insurance-related language indicating the HOA provides full or walls-in coverage, but the remarks do not mention it. There is no public remark evidence to confirm that the building is fully insured.
No analysis available
I searched the public remarks for explicit fire/life safety evaluation language, including FLSE pass status and fire inspection approval, and found nothing. Based on the absence of any such mention in the listings, this is treated as not evidenced in the remarks.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
City views are strongly supported across many listings, with numerous explicit mentions from different remarks. Phrases like "sweeping city views," "beautiful city views," "cityscape," and "evening city lights" indicate this is a recurring building feature rather than a one-off unit perk.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sunrise views are supported by multiple current listings, including one that says "fantastic views" with "incredible sunrise" views and another describing a "cityscape with mountain views from dawn to dusk." The repeated morning/dawn references suggest this is a real building-level view characteristic, not just copy-paste MLS language.
No analysis available
No analysis available
This is direct evidence that units in the building have fireworks views. The remarks explicitly say residents can watch the fireworks show from the lanai, which satisfies the requirement for a view from the building.
No analysis available
Multiple listings explicitly mention a resident manager, including phrases like “Resident Manger on-site with regular business hours,” “Manager on site,” and “an on-site resident manager.” At least five separate remarks, plus 14/18 MLS amenity checkboxes, consistently describe this feature across different agents and unit types. Evidence strongly supports that the building has an on-site resident manager available to residents.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.