Pae Ko Gardens
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Pae Ko Gardens
Building Overview
Pae Ko Gardens in Makakilo-Kapolei-Honokai Hale — wood-frame condo (1995) with pool and on-site resident manager.
About Pae Ko Gardens
Pae Ko Gardens is a condominium community located in the Makakilo-Kapolei-Honokai Hale neighborhood. According to available records, the property was built in 1995 and is constructed with a wood frame. Size and unit count information are not provided in the MLS data.
Key features reported in the MLS include a community pool and an on-site resident manager. Units are indicated to have split air conditioning systems.
Additional details from the MLS show assigned parking is available. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed per the provided data. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS. Based on MLS data; buyers should verify all information, rules, and fees with the listing agent or management before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit owner-occupancy percentages or descriptors such as "80% owner occupied," "majority owner occupied," or "highly owner occupied," but found none. One listing mentions owner-occupant requirements for an affordable housing unit, but that is not the same as the building's overall owner-occupancy rate.
I searched the public remarks for explicit elevator references such as "elevator," "lift," "multiple elevators," or a stated count like "4 elevators," and found none. The listings describe first-floor, ground-floor, and second-floor units, but nothing indicates the building has elevators.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong building-level signal: 17 of 20 current listings include OTCOEX, and none of the remarks contradict it. This appears consistent across multiple listings rather than a one-off agent input, so common-area electricity is very likely included in the association fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is no current MLS evidence that hot water is included: 0 of 20 listings have HOTWAT, and most instead list WTRHTR. Several remarks mention a replaced or new water heater, which supports unit-level water heating rather than HOA-supplied hot water.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer inclusion is unanimous in the current MLS data, with 20 of 20 listings showing SEWER. The public remarks do not contradict this, and the consistency suggests this is a true building-wide HOA inclusion rather than copy-paste noise.
Water is a unanimous current MLS feature: all 20 listings include WATER in the association fee. No remarks contradict that signal, so this appears to be a stable building-level inclusion.
BBQ/grilling facilities are supported by several listings. At least 2-3 remarks explicitly mention BBQ or barbecue-friendly outdoor space, and the historical MLS data already had BBQ appearing in amenities on 5/19 listings. The evidence looks real rather than a one-off copy-paste detail.
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is no meaningful evidence of a car wash amenity in the remarks. Unlike the other features, no listing describes a car wash station, vehicle wash area, or similar facility, and the MLS data only shows 1/19 listings checked. Based on the current evidence, this feature should not be treated as present.
Clubhouse/community-center access is strongly supported. Current listings mention a 'clubhouse' and 'community center' style amenities, and the historical MLS data shows this feature in a majority of listings. The repeated wording across remarks suggests a real shared amenity rather than an agent error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Meeting-room style amenities are clearly present in the building/community offerings. Several remarks mention a 'meeting room,' 'meeting halls,' or recreational/party rooms with guest capacity, which is consistent with the historical MLS checkbox data. The evidence is repeated enough across listings to treat this as a real feature.
Strong, repeated evidence across the listing set confirms patio/deck-type outdoor amenities. Roughly 15+ listings mention features like "lanai," "covered lanai," "patio," "courtyard," or "private outdoor space," which is consistent with the prior high-confidence MLS data. The language appears across multiple agents and looks like genuine building/unit amenity rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
Evidence for a jogging/walking path is weaker than the other amenities, but it is still supported. Current remarks do not explicitly say 'jogging path,' yet one listing mentions 'walking and biking paths,' which is reasonably close to the feature definition and aligns with the historical MLS data. Confidence is moderate because the wording is suggestive rather than direct.
No analysis available
There is clear evidence that some units in this building offer private yard or yard-like outdoor space. Several listings explicitly mention "private ground-level yard space," "large private yard," "fenced yard," and "fenced-in courtyard," showing this is not just an isolated remark. The feature appears to be available in certain ground-level units rather than universally across all units.
No analysis available
Recreation-area amenities are well supported across the listings. Multiple remarks explicitly reference a 'recreation area,' 'two recreation rooms,' and access to the Villages of Kapolei Recreation Center, which indicates this is a shared building/community amenity rather than a copy-paste anomaly. Current remarks align with the historical MLS data, so confidence is very high.
Numerous listings explicitly mention on-site recreation rooms and recreation areas, including specific capacity notes: "recreation room that can entertain up to 35 guests" and "two recreation rooms... up to 240 guests." Multiple agents corroborate the presence of recreation rooms, providing strong evidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage is strongly supported for this building. Across the listings, several agents mention it directly with phrases like 'storage,' 'storage & laundry,' and 'large fenced area ... can be used as storage,' while current MLS data also flags storage in both amenities and unit features. The evidence appears recurring across multiple remarks, so this is a reliable building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong, repeated evidence across many listings supports that the building/community offers a pool. Multiple remarks explicitly mention access to a "community pool," "swimming pool," and even "resort-style amenities including swimming pools," indicating this is not just a copied checkbox but a real shared amenity. This feature appears consistently across multiple agents and listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence for in-unit laundry is very strong across many Pae Ko Gardens listings, with multiple agents explicitly stating washer/dryer are included or located within the unit. Current remarks mention it in several different units and layouts, including "washer/dryer stay," "new washer/dryer combo," and "washer and dryer right within your unit space," which reinforces the existing high-confidence signal rather than suggesting any change.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Parking is clearly available at this building. Across the remarks, dozens of listings explicitly mention parking, most commonly "two assigned parking stalls" or "2 parking stalls," and some note guest parking as well. The evidence is strong and consistent across multiple agents, not just copy-paste checkbox data.
Assigned parking is a well-supported building feature. Multiple listings explicitly describe assigned stalls, often with details like 'two assigned parking stalls located directly in front of the building' and 'stall numbers (#199 and #202).' This is consistent across numerous remarks and aligns with the MLS checkbox pattern.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit deeded or owned parking language such as "deeded parking," "owned stall," or "parking included in deed." The listings only mention assigned or included parking, so deeded parking is not established from the public remarks.
No analysis available
I searched for terms like parking fee, monthly parking, parking rental, or additional parking cost. The remarks only say parking is assigned or included, so there is no evidence of a separate parking fee.
Guest parking appears to be available, though not as universally documented as assigned parking. Several remarks explicitly reference 'guest parking available' or 'ample guest parking nearby,' and the MLS data includes GUEST in a meaningful subset of listings. This looks like a real building amenity rather than a copy-paste-only claim.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for parking waitlist language such as "waitlist," "waiting list," or "join waitlist for parking." Nothing in the remarks suggests a parking waitlist system, so this is unsupported by the public text.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence across many listings that this building offers split AC / ductless mini-split systems in at least some units. I found explicit mentions in well over 10 remarks, and the wording is consistent across multiple agents rather than a single copy-paste source. Current MLS inclusions showing ACSPL in 9/20 listings also aligns with the historical high-confidence signal.
Window A/C appears in the current MLS inclusions for 7 of 19 listings, but none of the provided public remarks explicitly say "window AC," "window unit," or similar. The remarks instead consistently mention split A/C or general air conditioning, so this looks like a partial MLS data signal rather than a strongly confirmed building-wide feature.
No public remarks reference concrete construction, and there is no corroborating language such as "concrete building" or "reinforced concrete" across the listings. With only 5 of 19 current MLS records marking CONCRE and no descriptive support, this feature does not appear reliably established for the building.
Double-wall construction is supported by 17 of 20 current MLS listings, which is strong and consistent building-level evidence. Public remarks do not explicitly mention it, but the repeated MLS coding across many listings makes this highly reliable.
No analysis available
6 of 17 MLS listings indicate masonry/stucco (MASSTU), but public remarks contain no references to 'masonry' or 'stucco' and historical confidence was Low. This yields limited confidence that some listings/units claim masonry/stucco construction; the signal may be inconsistent or due to agent entry practices.
No analysis available
Concrete slab foundation appears in 8 of 20 current MLS listings, giving moderate support for the feature. No public remarks explicitly reference a slab foundation, so this is based on the MLS construction materials pattern rather than direct text confirmation.
No analysis available
Wood frame construction appears in 12 of 20 current MLS listings, suggesting it is a building-level characteristic rather than a unit-specific note. No public remarks explicitly say 'wood frame' or similar, so the evidence is primarily the repeated MLS construction coding across listings.
4 of 18 current MLS listings include the above-ground construction flag (ABOGRO). Public remarks reference 'ground-floor' and 'ground-level' units/yard areas but do not describe above-ground construction materials; given a small number of MLS checkboxes indicating ABOGRO, the feature is included with moderate, implied confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for short-term rental permission, NUC/TVU references, hotel-program language, and explicit restriction language. The remarks do not mention STR rules at all, so there is no direct evidence either way; the value is kept from prior analysis with low confidence because there are no recent mentions.
I looked for hotel rental pool references such as hotel program, Hilton/Trump/Ritz pool, or similar managed-rental wording. Nothing in the remarks suggests a hotel rental pool, so this remains false based on available public text.
I searched for wording that owners must participate in a rental pool or cannot opt out. The remarks do not indicate any rental-pool requirement, so mandatory participation is not supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for leasehold/ground lease wording and any 4-digit lease expiration year, but found none. The only tenure-related clue is "fee simple condo," which points away from a leasehold structure, so there is no lease expiry year to extract.
The remarks directly reference VA financing via an assumable VA mortgage, which is strong public evidence that VA loans are supported in this building. I found no conflicting language, so this remains a high-confidence true.
I searched for HOA insurance coverage language like "fully insured," "walls-in coverage," "full insurance," or "comprehensive building insurance," and found no matches. None of the public remarks provide evidence that the building is fully insured by the HOA.
No analysis available
I looked for language indicating a passed fire/life safety evaluation or inspection, such as "FLSE passed," "fire safety certified," "life safety compliant," or similar wording, and found none. The remarks do mention the community is well-maintained, but that is not evidence of a fire/life safety pass.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Current MLS data shows 0 of 15 listings marked with a mountain view and 8 of 15 explicitly state the view is 'None.' Public remarks across many listings emphasize courtyards, lanais, and recreation center access but never reference mountain or mauka views. Given the consistent absence of any mountain-view marketing across multiple agents and listings, this building is not considered to offer mountain views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across the provided listings, there is no evidence of sunset views for this building. Zero listings mention sunset, evening sun, western exposure, or fireworks views, and many MLS entries explicitly show VIEW = NONE. The remarks appear to focus on courtyard/park/open views and unit upgrades rather than any sunset-oriented exposure.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence is strong that the building has a resident/on-site manager. Historical MLS data already had RESMAN in 10 of 19 listings, and current MLS data shows 11 of 20 listings with RESMAN. One public remark explicitly says the building has a "General Manager," which supports the amenity and suggests the checkbox is not just copy-paste noise.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.