Pacifica Honolulu
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Pacifica Honolulu
Building Overview
Pacifica Honolulu in Ala Moana-Kakaako, a 2011 concrete high-rise (48 floors) offering pool and fitness center.
About Pacifica Honolulu
Pacifica Honolulu is a 48-floor residential tower located in the Ala Moana-Kakaako neighborhood. According to available records, the building was completed in 2011 and is constructed of concrete.
Key on-site amenities include a pool, fitness center, and a BBQ area. The building also lists a resident manager and a security guard. Units are served by central air conditioning and some units have ocean, mountain, and sunset views.
Parking is available and described as covered, assigned, with guest parking. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed. The management company is listed as unknown in the provided data. Based on MLS data, buyers should verify all building features, policies, fees and other details with the listing agent or management.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for owner-occupancy percentages and descriptive phrases indicating a high owner-occupied ratio. No listing provided a number or even a qualitative ownership mix statement. The owner occupancy rate cannot be determined from these remarks.
I searched the remarks for explicit elevator counts and qualifying phrases. The listings mention high-speed elevators, but none provide a number or a clear statement like multiple elevators. Since there is no explicit count, the exact value remains unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
Strong evidence across listings: 18 of 20 MLS records list CABTV and agent copy explicitly states 'Maintenance fee includes Cable TV and Internet!' in several listings. Multiple agents repeat the phrase, suggesting the building-level fee reliably includes cable (likely copy/paste but supported by many records).
Moderate support: 15 of 20 MLS records list OTCOEX indicating common area electric is included, but public remarks are mixed. Notably one remark states 'Electric sub-metered and billed through the AOUO,' implying electric may be billed separately. Evidence is therefore ambiguous and likely affected by agent copy/paste; include the feature with moderate confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence hot water is not included: 16 of 20 MLS records list WTRHTR (unit water heater) and only 1 lists HOTWAT; numerous remarks mention "new water heater" or in-unit hot water, supporting that hot water is provided by in-unit heaters rather than included in association fees.
Strong evidence across listings: 16 of 20 MLS records list INTSER and agent remarks explicitly mention 'Internet included' or 'Maintenance fee includes Cable TV and Internet!' in several listings. Multiple agents repeat this, supporting building-level inclusion of internet service.
No analysis available
Very strong evidence: 18 of 20 MLS records list SEWER as included in association fees, and public remarks provide no contradiction. The consistency across multiple listings indicates sewer is included in the maintenance fee.
Strong evidence: 19 of 20 MLS records list WATER in association_fee_includes. While some listings note in-unit water heaters or recent water heater replacements, public remarks do not contradict that water is included in the association fees, supporting inclusion.
Clear, repeated evidence: 20 of 20 MLS listings check BBQ and many remarks reference 'BBQ cabanas', 'BBQ areas', and 'multiple cabanas with grills.' Mentions are widespread across listings and not limited to one or two agents, supporting this as a building amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Clear evidence: 15 of 20 MLS listings include the dog park checkbox and numerous agent remarks explicitly mention a 'dog park', 'private dog park', or 'gated park' on the property. Mentions appear across multiple listings and agents, indicating a shared building amenity.
No analysis available
Strong, consistent evidence: 20 of 20 current MLS listings include the exercise room/fitness center checkbox and many public remarks explicitly state 'fitness center', 'full gym', or 'exercise room.' Mentions appear across numerous agent remarks (not isolated to a single agent), indicating a building-level shared amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Building-level outdoor amenity deck is well-supported: 7 of 20 current MLS listings check PATDEC/COVPAT and many remarks explicitly reference a "5th-floor recreation deck" or "recreation/amenity deck" with pool, cabanas, BBQ and seating areas (quotes include "5th-floor recreation deck" and "recreation deck"). Evidence appears across multiple agent remarks and aligns with prior high-confidence historical data, indicating a genuine shared patio/deck amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence: 16 of 20 current MLS listings include the recreation area checkbox and numerous remarks reference a 'recreation deck' or '5th-floor recreation deck' and other party/recreation spaces. The references are consistent across many listings and agents.
Moderately strong evidence: 7 of 20 MLS listings have the rec room checkbox, and many remarks reference 'party room', 'party pavilion', 'private party rooms' and 'catering kitchen' or 'rentable event spaces', indicating shared recreation/party rooms available to residents.
Strong evidence: 15 of 20 MLS listings check the restaurant amenity and many remarks explicitly mention on-site eateries—'Doraku', 'Chai’s', 'Blue Tree Cafe'—and phrases like 'restaurants located downstairs', confirming on-site dining options in the building.
No analysis available
Strong, consistent evidence: 18 of 20 MLS listings include the sauna checkbox and many remarks explicitly reference 'sauna', 'his and her saunas', or 'sauna/locker rooms.' Multiple independent listings mention the sauna, supporting high confidence.
No analysis available
Multiple remarks directly confirm surfboard storage, including one listing that says the building has "surfboard storage" and another that references a "Surfboard and bike storage area." This is strong public-remarks evidence that the building offers surfboard storage.
No analysis available
Implied evidence: All current MLS listings have the trash/garbage chute checkbox checked (20/20), but zero public remarks mention 'trash chute' or 'garbage chute.' Because this is checkbox-only evidence with no remark confirmation, confidence is moderate (implied) rather than high.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Numerous listings mention 'hot tub', 'jacuzzi', 'pool & spa', 'heated pool with jacuzzi' or 'whirlpool' (e.g., 'pool and jacuzzi', 'heated pool and hot tub'), indicating the building provides spa/jacuzzi/whirlpool amenities.
All 20/20 current MLS listings included the POOL amenity and numerous public remarks explicitly mention pool-related amenities. Examples: listings state “swimming pool,” “heated pool,” “infinity pool,” “large pool,” and “poolside cabanas,” appearing across multiple agents’ remarks on the building’s 5th-floor recreation deck and amenity areas. Evidence is consistent and strong across listings, supporting high confidence that the building offers a swimming pool.
Moderate evidence the pool is heated: while only a small number of MLS amenity flags list HEAPOO (2/20), at least several public remarks explicitly say 'heated pool', 'heated pool and hot tub', or 'heated swimming pool' in different listings, suggesting the amenity exists though it is not listed uniformly by all agents.
I searched for wording like "salt water pool," "saltwater pool," or "saline pool." The amenities consistently mention a pool, hot tub, or jacuzzi, but never specify that the pool is salt water.
Very strong evidence that some units in the building have in-unit laundry: numerous listings (all current MLS entries) mention "in-unit washer/dryer", "in-unit washer and dryer", "washer & dryer", or describe a "laundry room". This consistent, building-wide reporting across many listings indicates the building offers units with in-unit washers and dryers.
No analysis available
I looked for references to paid laundry such as coin laundry, quarters, card-operated machines, or laundry fees. The remarks repeatedly mention in-unit washer/dryers instead, with no evidence of a paid shared laundry facility.
I searched the public remarks for phrases like "laundry on each floor," "laundry room on every floor," and similar wording. The listings mention in-unit washer/dryer and separate laundry rooms in some units, but nothing indicates a community laundry room on every floor.
No analysis available
Strong evidence that the building offers assigned parking: 18 of 20 MLS records list ASSIGN and several remarks explicitly state 'one assigned' or 'one assigned covered and secure parking stall'. Multiple listings and agents repeatedly reference assigned stalls, so this is a building-level offering buyers would reasonably expect.
Strong evidence that the building offers covered parking: 19 of 20 MLS records historically showed covered/garage parking and multiple current remarks explicitly state 'covered parking', 'covered and secure parking stall', or 'cov'd parking'. Mentions appear across many different listings/agents, indicating this is a building feature rather than isolated copy-paste error.
I looked for explicit wording like deeded parking, owned stall, or parking included in the deed. The listings only describe the parking as assigned/covered/tandem, so deeded parking is not confirmed.
No analysis available
I searched for parking fee language such as monthly parking cost, parking rental, or additional parking charge. The remarks do not provide any such fee information, so this remains unknown.
Well supported: 17 of 20 MLS records include guest parking and many listings mention 'guest parking' or 'guest parking at street level' (e.g., 'guest parking at street level from Kapiolani Boulevard', 'secured guest parking area'), indicating guest parking is available in the building.
Strong corroboration: 17 of 20 MLS records flag secured-entry and many public remarks mention 'secured parking and entry', 'secured access to the building/garage', and 24-hour security/front desk, supporting that parking has secured access.
Moderately strong evidence that the building includes tandem parking options: approximately 11 of 20 listings (and numerous remarks) explicitly mention 'tandem' or 'two tandem parking stalls'. Other listings note side-by-side or standard stalls, so tandem applies to some units rather than all.
No analysis available
I looked for terms like parking waitlist, waiting list, or join the waitlist for parking. The remarks only reference assigned and guest parking, with no evidence of a waitlist system.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit card-based security terms such as keycard entry, fob access, or card reader access. The listings do say the building is secure and has secured access, but they do not specifically confirm a card/fob system.
Building-level security is well-supported: current remarks across the listing set repeatedly state '24-hour security'/'24-hour front desk service' and '24/7 security guards' (matching the MLS checkbox used in ~16 of 20 listings). Multiple agents independently reference on-site security/resident manager and secured access, indicating strong, consistent evidence rather than isolated copy‑paste errors.
I searched for terms like "security patrol," "roving security," and "patrol service." The remarks mention 24-hour security, security staff, front desk service, and resident manager, but not a patrol service.
No analysis available
High-confidence evidence that Pacifica Honolulu has building central air. Historical MLS checkbox data was strongly supportive (14/20 unit_features; ACCEN in all inclusions) and at least 15 current listing remarks explicitly state "central AC" or "central air", e.g., "central A/C for year-round comfort" and "features central AC", showing consistent confirmation across multiple agents rather than isolated entries.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong building-level evidence: 18 of 20 recent MLS listings list 'CONCRE' as the construction material. None of the public remarks mention a change to the building's construction or explicitly contradict concrete construction, and multiple agents consistently describe the high-rise as a modern, well-built tower (e.g., "all-Glass Pacifica Honolulu"). The weight of the MLS checkbox data across many listings supports including construction_concrete as true.
Moderate-to-strong MLS evidence: 15 of 20 recent listings include the DOUWAL flag indicating double-wall construction. Remarks across listings do not explicitly reference double-wall construction, so the evidence is primarily MLS checkbox data appearing across multiple agents and may reflect standardized building descriptions.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Steel-frame is not supported by the public remarks: no listings mention 'steel frame' or similar language. Only a small minority of MLS records include STEFRA, and agent descriptions consistently omit any steel-frame claim, suggesting that steel-frame is unlikely or at best unconfirmed.
Weak MLS signal: only 4 of 20 listings show SLAB and none of the public remarks mention 'concrete slab' or 'slab foundation.' Given the low prevalence and no corroborating remarks, slab foundation is likely not a building-level feature despite a handful of MLS checks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Moderate historical support but current evidence weak: only 4 of 20 current MLS listings show the ABOGRO flag and no public remarks across many agent listings mention 'above ground' construction or a recent change. Given the medium prior confidence, the now-low checkbox prevalence, and lack of confirming remarks, the ABOGRO flag appears to have been removed/corrected and is omitted here pending owner/site-verified confirmation.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for indicators that short-term rentals are allowed, such as STR permitted, TVU, NUC, or vacation rental language. Nothing in the public remarks suggests STRs are allowed, so this is set to false with modest confidence due to lack of evidence.
I looked for hotel pool references such as hotel rental program, managed by hotel, or branded pool participation. Since there were no such mentions and no evidence of STR permission, this is false.
I searched for language indicating mandatory participation in a rental pool, such as must participate or cannot opt out. The remarks contain none of that, so there is no basis to mark this true.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for references to leasehold status, ground lease, and expiration years such as "lease expires" or "ground lease ends." None were present in the public remarks, so the expiry year remains unknown.
The public remarks clearly indicate VA-related financing is available, including an assumable VA loan. This is strong evidence from multiple listings and supports a true value with very high confidence.
I searched for full insurance / walls-in coverage language such as fully insured, full insurance, and comprehensive building insurance. Multiple remarks explicitly say the building has 100% hurricane insurance coverage. This is strong evidence that the HOA insurance is fully in place for the building as described in the remarks.
Strong evidence the building has a fire sprinkler system: historical MLS checkbox data listed FIRSPR in 19 of 20 records and at least 3 current remarks explicitly state "fire sprinkler" or "sprinkler systems" (e.g., "fire sprinkler, also interior painted...", "newer building built with sprinkler systems"). The mentions appear across multiple agent remarks and corroborate the historical high-confidence data.
I searched for fire/life safety evaluation language, fire inspection references, and FLSE-related wording across the remarks. The building is described as having fire sprinklers and being well maintained, but there is no public remark stating that it passed a fire/life safety evaluation. Based on the remarks alone, this is not confirmed.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
High confidence: over 20 separate remark sections explicitly mention ocean or panoramic ocean views (phrases include "ocean view", "ocean and city views", "panoramic ocean views" and "ocean views from living room and bedroom"). Evidence is consistent across multiple listings and agents rather than appearing as a single copy/paste error, and historical data also indicated strong ocean view presence.
Strong evidence across many listings: approximately 30 separate remark sections mention mountain/Koolau/mauka views (quotes include "Enjoy breathtaking, unobstructed mountain views", "majestic views of the Ko'olau mountains", and "mauka side of the building"). Mentions appear across multiple agents/listings and consistently describe building-level views rather than single-unit anomalies, indicating robust building-level mountain views.
No analysis available
Strong, consistent evidence that the building offers city views: 20 of 20 current listings reference city/downtown/city-skyline views (examples include "sweeping panoramic views of the city skyline," "city views," and "awesome city light views at night"). Mentions appear across many independent remark sections and unit types, indicating this is a building-level characteristic rather than an isolated or mistaken entry.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Moderate-to-high confidence: at least several remark sections (multiple penthouse/high-floor listings) explicitly reference "sunset views" or "sunsets" and one mentions "sunsets" along with panoramic ocean and mountain views. The mentions are specific to certain units (penthouses/high floors), so the building does offer sunset-view units.
No analysis available
I searched for direct statements like "fireworks view," "watch fireworks from lanai," or "see fireworks from unit." The remarks discuss ocean, city, mountain, and sunset views, but do not confirm fireworks visibility from the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Moderately strong support that the building has a resident/on-site manager: historical MLS data had RESMAN checked in 14 of 20 records and at least 4 current remarks explicitly mention an on-site or resident manager (phrases include "on-site resident manager" and "resident manager and security team"), indicating this is a building-level staffed service rather than isolated copy-paste.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.