Pacific Village
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Pacific Village
Building Overview
Pacific Village in Aiea (built 1970) features an on-site pool and assigned parking. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed.
About Pacific Village
Based on MLS data, Pacific Village is a residential building located in Aiea that was built in 1970. Records do not specify building size or construction type, so those details should be verified with listing documents or management.
According to available records, the building includes an on-site pool as an amenity. No other common-area amenities are listed in the MLS data provided.
MLS data indicates parking is available and assigned. Pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not permitted. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS. This summary is based on MLS data only; prospective buyers should confirm all details (amenities, rules, fees, and management) through official documents and the managing entity.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
The remarks directly provide the owner-occupancy estimate, so this is the strongest available data point. No further inference was needed because the listing states approximately 73% owner occupancy.
I searched the public remarks for any reference to elevators or a count such as '4 elevators' or 'multiple elevators' and found nothing. With no explicit mention, the number of elevators cannot be determined from these listings.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
Cable TV inclusion is not supported by the current public remarks, and the MLS signal is very weak at just 1 of 14 listings. With no corroborating language like “cable included” or “cable in HOA fees,” this appears inconsistent and likely unreliable.
Common area electricity is strongly supported by the MLS data, with 12 of 14 current listings showing OTCOEX. The pattern is consistent enough across multiple listings to suggest a building-level fee item rather than an isolated agent entry.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence points strongly to hot water not being included. Across the current listings, 0 of 13 show HOTWAT while 12 of 13 list WTRHTR, and remarks repeatedly mention a new water heater or tankless water heater, which aligns with unit-owned hot water equipment rather than HOA-provided hot water. This is a very strong correction against inclusion.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer inclusion is very strongly supported by the MLS records, with 13 of 14 listings marked SEWER. The consistency across listings indicates this is a stable building-level fee inclusion.
Water inclusion remains strongly supported, with 13 of 14 current listings showing WATER in association_fee_includes. The repeat pattern across listings supports this as a reliable building feature rather than a one-off checkbox entry.
BBQ/grilling facilities are mentioned in several listings, including phrases like "BBQ area" and amenity lists alongside pool/playground/recreation center. The evidence appears consistent across multiple agents and is unlikely to be a copy-paste error because it shows up in separate remarks for different units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Clubhouse/community-center style amenities are supported by multiple remarks describing a "Recreation Center for large gatherings" and a "meeting room and relaxation area." While the exact word "clubhouse" is not used often, the described shared gathering space is functionally the same and appears to be a building amenity, not a private-unit feature.
No analysis available
There are no explicit mentions of a dog park or dog run in the public remarks across the provided listings. The historical summary also noted that remarks only described pet-friendly features, not a dedicated dog area, so this looks like a likely MLS checkbox mismatch rather than a real building amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong building-level evidence for patio/deck amenities. At least 10+ listings mention outdoor space with phrases like 'private patio,' 'covered patio,' 'lanai,' 'enclosed lanai,' and 'private lanais,' suggesting this is a common or recurring feature in the building. The consistency across multiple remarks makes this high-confidence and not likely just MLS copy-paste noise.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Moderate-to-strong evidence that some units offer private yard-type space. At least 2 listings explicitly mention 'fenced backyard' or 'fenced private courtyard,' and another notes access to a 'community backyard,' suggesting outdoor yard access is part of the building's unit mix. The evidence is enough to retain the feature for buyers searching for yard space.
No analysis available
No analysis available
This feature is well supported: multiple listings mention a "Recreation Center for large gatherings," "recreation center," or "recreation area." The evidence is consistent across several remarks and aligns with the current MLS data, so this building clearly offers a recreation room/community gathering space.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage is supported by both historical MLS checkbox data and current remarks. At least 2 current listing remarks explicitly mention storage, including 'additional space currently used for storage' and 'storage on the 1st floor,' while the MLS history shows storage checked in both amenities and unit features across many listings. This looks like a consistently present building/unit feature rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong, consistent evidence across the listings supports a building pool amenity. Remarks from many different agents mention variations such as "large community pool," "on-site pool," "two swimming pools," "in-ground pool and hot tub," and "outdoor pool," which aligns with the MLS amenities data. This appears to be a true shared building/community feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Laundry in unit is well supported across this building. At least 2 listings explicitly mention it in remarks, including phrases like “an in-unit washer and dryer” and “washer and dryer are on the main level,” while current MLS inclusions show WASHER/DRYER in 11 of 14 listings. This looks like consistent building-level evidence rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Parking is clearly available across the sampled listings, with every listing source indicating some form of parking. Remarks mention multiple types, including assigned open stalls, side-by-side stalls, open parking, and garages, so this does not look like a copy-paste checkbox issue.
Assigned parking is strongly supported by both MLS data and agent remarks. Multiple listings explicitly say the stalls are assigned or located directly in front of the unit, which is consistent across several remarks and not just a single checkbox.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit deeded-parking language like "deeded parking," "owned stall," or "parking included in deed" and found none. The remarks mention assigned stalls and a garage, but not that parking is deeded with the unit.
No analysis available
I looked for parking rental charges, monthly parking fees, or additional parking costs. The remarks only mention the possibility to rent a second open stall from the HOA, but no fee amount is stated.
Guest/visitor parking is well documented in the listings. Several remarks mention ample guest parking or visitor parking, including a specific count of 16 visitor spaces, which strongly supports this feature for the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for terms like "parking waitlist," "parking waiting list," or "join waitlist for parking" and found nothing. The remarks discuss assigned stalls, a garage, and the possibility of renting an extra stall, but not a waitlist system.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Window air conditioning is supported by both historical MLS checkbox data and current remarks. At least 2 listings explicitly mention it, including "window AC" and "AC units in the bedrooms," which is strong corroboration rather than a single copy-paste mention. Given the prior high-confidence MLS signal, this feature should be included.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Hollow tile construction appears in 6 of 13 current MLS listings and had prior Medium confidence. Because none of the public remarks explicitly mention “hollow tile,” this looks like MLS checkbox-level evidence without remark corroboration, but it is still enough to keep the feature as present.
Masonry/stucco construction is still supported by current MLS data, with 8 of 14 listings marked MASSTU. The public remarks across multiple listings do not specifically mention construction materials, but there is also no evidence of a change away from masonry/stucco. Given the prior High confidence and the current MLS consistency, this remains a strong building-level feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Wood frame construction appears in a majority of current MLS listings (8 of 13) and was already at Medium confidence historically. No public remarks explicitly say “wood frame,” so the evidence is mostly the repeated MLS material entry rather than agent narrative, but it is still strong enough to treat as present.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for short-term rental indicators such as "short-term rental allowed," "vacation rental," "NUC," "TVU," or "30-day minimum" and found no evidence. There is also no language suggesting owner-occupant-only restrictions, so the remarks do not support STR allowance.
I looked for hotel rental pool references such as Hilton, Ritz, Trump pool, or any hotel-managed rental program and found none. Since there is no evidence that short-term rentals are allowed, this must remain false.
I searched for wording like "required to participate," "cannot opt out," or mandatory rental-pool participation and found nothing. With no evidence of a hotel or rental pool program, mandatory participation is not supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for leasehold/ground lease wording and any 4-digit lease expiry year such as "lease expires 2050" or "ground lease ends" and found nothing. The remarks do not provide enough information to determine a lease expiry year.
I searched the public remarks for explicit VA language such as "VA approved," "VA financing," or "VA loans accepted" and found none. Based on the remarks provided, there is no evidence that this building is VA-approved.
I searched the remarks for any statement that the HOA or building is fully insured or offers walls-in coverage, but found none. Since insurance status is only supported by public remarks here, it remains unconfirmed.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit language indicating a passed fire/life safety evaluation, fire safety certification, or compliance status, but none was present in the remarks. Because there is no current value and no supporting evidence, this is treated as not indicated by the listings.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Mountain views are not explicitly described in the remarks, but the current MLS view data includes 3 of 14 listings marked MOUNTA. The public remarks more often reference Pearl Harbor, Pearlridge Center, ocean, or general outlooks, which suggests the mountain view checkbox may be selective or inconsistently applied by agents rather than broadly advertised.
No analysis available
Across the remarks, 0 listings clearly describe city views. The only view language is about Pearl Harbor, Pearlridge Center, or ocean views, suggesting the CITY checkbox is likely being copied in MLS data rather than reflecting a confirmed building-wide feature.
No analysis available
Garden view evidence is weak but present in the current MLS data: 1 of 14 listings is tagged GARDEN. The remarks instead emphasize private courtyards, patios, fenced backyards, and general community amenities, so this looks like a rare or inconsistently entered view attribute rather than a widely repeated feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.