Pacific Monarch

MLS data is unanimous that Pacific Monarch was built in 1980, and the remarks only reference renovations to units and common areas, not new construction. With no contradictory textual evidence, 1980 is accepted as the building’s construction year with high confidence.

Listings reference units as high as the 31st and 32nd floors and describe rooftop and penthouse amenities above or at these levels, but no remark states an exact story count (e.g., '34-story'). Given no contrary evidence, the building is assumed to have 32 floors matching the highest documented residential floor. Future data with an explicit 'X-story' description could refine this further.

None of the analyzed remarks include any reference to how many units exist in Pacific Monarch as a whole, only individual unit descriptions. Because MLS NumberOfUnitsTotal is 0 (a known placeholder) and no textual evidence provides a building-wide unit count, the actual total units remain unknown based on current data.

The current owner-occupancy value of 4.0 is retained because the remarks provide no owner-occupancy information. There is no evidence in the remarks to confirm or deny the current value.

The current value of 3 elevators is retained because the public remarks provide no elevator information. There is no evidence in the remarks to confirm or deny this value.

Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.

Listings repeatedly highlight individual split A/C or window A/C in specific units but never mention central air as a building utility or as part of the maintenance fee. Combined with the absence of the ACCEN checkbox in all current MLS records, this strongly indicates that central AC is not provided or included in the fees.

Cable inclusion is strongly supported across the building: 19/20 current listings contain CABTV. Remarks explicitly say the fee includes “cable TV” and “basic cable TV,” confirming this across multiple listings.

Common-area electricity is supported primarily by MLS data, appearing as OTCOEX in 15 of 20 current listings. Although public remarks do not usually spell out “common-area electricity,” the strong, repeated MLS coding and prior high confidence support inclusion.

Remarks discuss fee simple versus leasehold and short-term rental eligibility but never mention cooperative ownership or co-op taxes. With no MLS entries marking co-op taxes as included, this is very clearly not a co-op building, so co-op taxes are not part of the maintenance fee.

Electricity inclusion is consistently documented in 19/20 current listings. Multiple remarks state “maintenance fee includes electricity,” including detailed fee descriptions, providing strong multi-listing confirmation.

Across many listings, utilities included in the maintenance fee are listed in detail, and gas is never mentioned, nor is there any sign of gas appliances. With the GAS checkbox absent in all MLS records, it is very likely that the building does not provide or include gas in the HOA fees.

Hot water inclusion is strongly supported by 19/20 HOTWAT entries and no WTRHTR entries. Remarks explicitly state that fees include “hot water” and “both hot and cold water,” confirming building-supplied hot water.

Internet service is consistently identified as included, appearing in 18/20 current listings. Remarks include “internet” and “basic internet” in the maintenance-fee descriptions, supporting the feature despite slightly fewer checkbox entries.

All descriptions focus on proximity to Waikiki Beach, shopping, and rooftop amenities, with no mention of docks or marina facilities. The complete absence of MARINA in MLS fee-includes fields strongly supports that marina access or fees are not part of the maintenance charge.

Sewer inclusion is one of the most consistent building features, with SEWER listed in 19/20 current listings. A detailed remark states that the maintenance fee includes “electricity, water, sewer, cable, and internet,” confirming the inclusion.

Water inclusion is very strongly supported by 19/20 current listings. Remarks repeatedly state “water” is included, including one detailed listing specifying “electricity, water, hot water, basic cable TV, and basic internet.”

BBQ facilities are strongly confirmed across the building. Multiple remarks cite a "BBQ area," "BBQ grills," or "barbecue area" on the rooftop, supported by 19 of 20 current MLS records.

No listings mention bike storage or similar facilities, and MLS amenities never include a bike-storage checkbox. Given how extensively other amenities are advertised, the absence of any bike-related references suggests the building does not provide dedicated bicycle storage.

All location descriptions reference walking distance to Waikiki Beach, International Market Place, and urban attractions rather than any waterfront dock or marina. Given both the building’s inland setting and the absence of any boat-related amenities, it is certain there is no boat dock.

Although some listings mention a large parking garage and paid parking, none describe any car-wash amenity. This consistent omission, plus MLS data, makes it very likely there is no car wash facility.

Mixed evidence: only a few MLS checkboxes indicate 'club_house', while multiple remarks describe a penthouse/hospitality lounge or community lounge rather than a distinct clubhouse. Because some agents may use different terms interchangeably, inclusion is tentative (phrased as community/party space rather than a separate clubhouse).

Well over 10 listings describe a staffed front desk, including '24-hour front desk', 'front desk check-in services', and 'front desk service', clearly indicating concierge-type operations. This front desk is repeatedly presented as a core amenity for guests and owners. Despite sparse MLS checkbox use, narrative remarks from multiple independent agents confirm that concierge/front desk service is a real, building-level feature.

Given the thorough coverage of amenities in the remarks and the lack of any reference to pet-specific facilities, it is very unlikely that the building has a dog park or dog run. The MLS data is consistent with this absence.

Over 10 separate remarks refer to a front desk or front desk check-in, yet there are zero mentions of a doorman or lobby attendant. MLS data likewise shows no listings with a doorman amenity selected. This strongly indicates that staffing is organized as a front desk/concierge, not as a traditional doorman service.

No public remarks identify an exercise room or fitness facility across the provided listings. The feature appears in only 1 of 20 current MLS records, while repeated amenity descriptions focus on the rooftop pool, sauna, BBQ, and recreation facilities instead.

Despite frequent references to front desk and hotel rental pool management, there is no indication of any limousine or courtesy car service. The absence in both MLS and remarks strongly indicates no limo or house car service is offered.

Multiple listings confirm a communal meeting or hospitality space. Key descriptions include an "indoor Hospitality Suite with dining tables, lounge chairs, TV, pool table," a "community room," and a "party room," indicating a shared amenity rather than a private unit feature.

At least 14 of 20 current listings carry the PATDEC/COVPAT amenity indicators, and many remarks explicitly mention shared outdoor spaces such as a “rooftop pool deck,” “rooftop recreation deck,” “rooftop oasis,” and “outdoor dining space.” Multiple agents also describe private unit lanais or balconies, so evidence is strong across listings and confirms that Pacific Monarch offers patio/deck amenities.

While agents note nearby attractions like Kapiolani Park and Waikiki Beach, there is no reference to a dedicated jogging or walking path within the building’s grounds. This, along with MLS data, indicates the building does not offer its own jogging path.

The building is presented as a resort-style condotel focused on adult and tourist amenities (pool, hot tub, sauna, BBQ, lounge), with no suggestion of children’s play structures. Combined with 0/20 MLS indications, this supports that there is no playground.

Across all provided remarks, outdoor space is described only as lanais/balconies and the shared rooftop recreation/pool deck; there is no mention of any private yard, fenced yard, or enclosed ground‑level yard area. With 0/20 MLS entries flagging a private yard and no textual evidence, this appears to be a building without yard amenities (not a correction of prior data, just confirmation of absence).

Agents highlight views of Ala Wai Golf Course nearby but do not mention any on-site putting green. The complete absence of such mentions, along with MLS data, makes it highly likely there is no putting green at the building.

The building clearly offers shared recreation facilities, repeatedly described as a rooftop recreation deck, lounge, or enclosed recreation room. Although some listings call it a penthouse-level facility, the repeated references to resident and guest access support inclusion.

The building clearly offers shared recreational space despite variation in checkbox usage. Remarks repeatedly mention a "rooftop recreation area," "enclosed recreation room," "recreation lounge," and "penthouse recreation room," often with a pool table or TV.

Mixed evidence: 15/20 MLS listings include a restaurant amenity (medium historical confidence), but none of the public remarks explicitly describe an on-site restaurant or dining facility. Remarks mention a hospitality suite with dining tables and many nearby restaurants, indicating agents may have checked the restaurant box inconsistently; inclusion retained because multiple MLS listings list it, but confidence is moderate due to lack of explicit remarks.

Dozens of listings independently describe extensive rooftop amenities, including one of Waikiki’s highest rooftop pools, hot tub, BBQ, and lounge areas, often with 360-degree views. This overwhelming textual evidence confirms shared rooftop amenities and rooftop access regardless of the MLS checkbox state.

Sauna evidence is exceptionally strong and spans numerous listings. Agents describe a "rooftop sauna," simply "sauna," or sauna adjoining the pool, recreation deck, and Hospitality Suite.

Evidence is limited but present: 1 of 20 current MLS listings has the storage amenity checked and one listing's public remarks explicitly says the unit includes "owner storage." Mentions are isolated (appear in a single listing rather than across multiple agents), but the explicit remark plus the MLS checkbox indicate the building does offer storage lockers/owner storage.

Multiple listings describe a wide range of building amenities (rooftop pool, jacuzzi, sauna, BBQ area, recreation room, community laundry, parking, front desk) but none reference any surfboard-specific storage. I searched for terms like 'surfboard storage', 'board storage', 'surf storage', and 'bike and surfboard storage' and found no matches, so the building is assumed not to offer dedicated surfboard storage based on current public information.

The extensive amenity descriptions focus on rooftop pool/whirlpool, BBQ, sauna, and recreation rooms with no mention of tennis. Combined with 0/20 MLS selections, this strongly indicates there is no tennis court at the building.

The trash chute is supported primarily by MLS amenity data, with 19 of 20 current listings marking it. A listing explicitly mentions a "trash chute" alongside the laundry room and rooftop amenities; the sparse wording in other remarks may reflect copied or abbreviated amenity descriptions rather than absence.

Multiple listings reference parking as paid, secured, or available for a monthly/daily fee but never use the terms “valet” or “valet parking.” Combined with 0/20 MLS valet flags, the evidence strongly supports that parking is self‑park in a garage, not valet (again, this is not correcting a prior true flag, just establishing absence).

Across many detailed descriptions of the building and its amenities, there is no reference to a gated entry, fenced grounds, perimeter wall, or similar physical enclosure. MLS amenity data likewise shows no gated or wall/fence features selected. This strongly suggests the property is an open streetfront high-rise rather than a walled or gated compound.

Whirlpool facilities are consistently supported across many listings. Remarks repeatedly cite a rooftop "whirlpool," "hot tub," or "jacuzzi," including the renovated rooftop pool deck and resort-style amenity descriptions.

The building pool is strongly confirmed across many listings from multiple agents, not merely by checkbox data. Remarks repeatedly identify a shared rooftop pool with ocean or city views, often alongside a whirlpool or jacuzzi, sauna, and recreation area.

A heated-pool designation appears in 6 of 20 current MLS records, but the public remarks consistently describe the pool separately from a "hot tub," "jacuzzi," or "whirlpool" and do not use the phrase "heated pool." This is therefore plausible from MLS amenity coding but only moderately supported by remarks and may reflect checkbox or copied data.

The public remarks repeatedly mention a rooftop pool, swimming pool, and jacuzzi/hot tub, but never describe the pool as salt water, saltwater, saline, or similar. Given the complete absence of such descriptors across many listings, the pool is assumed not to be a salt water pool, though this cannot be confirmed with high certainty from the remarks alone.

No public remarks in the supplied listings mention 'washer/dryer in unit', 'in-unit laundry', or similar. Current MLS checkboxes show WASHER/DRYER in only 2 of 20 listings, but the remarks (0 mentions) and prior high-confidence history indicate this is likely an agent data error rather than actual in-unit laundry.

At least 8 listings explicitly mention shared laundry, using phrases such as “Community Laundry Room,” “community laundry,” and “laundry room on the 3rd floor.” The feature is also checked in 19/20 current MLS listings and aligns with the prior high-confidence building record, making the evidence strong across multiple listings rather than a single copy-pasted remark.

The remarks confirm the presence of community laundry but provide no details on whether it is free or paid. Since there are no terms like 'coin-op', 'card-operated', or 'paid laundry', the paid status cannot be confirmed and is set to false by default with low confidence.

Multiple listings describe a shared community laundry located on the 3rd floor, implying a centralized facility rather than laundry on every floor. No phrasing such as 'laundry on each floor' or 'laundry room on every floor' appears in the remarks.

At least 10 current listing remarks mention building parking, including “one of the larger parking garages in Waikiki,” “secured parking,” “paid parking is available,” and “parking available for a monthly $220 fee.” The repeated references across multiple agents and the prior high-confidence evidence outweigh the inconsistent MLS checkbox entries, which likely reflect copy-paste or unit-level parking availability differences.

Listings refer to parking only as paid garage use (e.g. daily or monthly fees) with no wording like 'assigned' or 'deeded stall.' Combined with the absence of ASSIGN in current MLS data, this strongly suggests there is no assigned parking for units.

Covered parking is strongly supported across numerous current listings, with at least 8 of 20 MLS records marked with covered/garage parking features. Multiple independent remarks explicitly describe a parking garage or secured/enclosed parking, often noting paid access for owners and guests, so this is not merely an isolated checkbox or copy-paste error.

Public remarks consistently characterize parking as fee-based garage access rather than ownership included with the unit. No remarks state that a parking stall is deeded, owned, or included in the deed.

Across all compiled remarks there are detailed descriptions of amenities and parking, but nothing about EV charging or electric vehicle stations. Given the explicit omission in both text and MLS checkboxes, EV parking is very unlikely to be present.

The public remarks provide a specific recurring parking charge of $220 per month. Other listings confirm that parking is paid or available for a fee, supporting the stated amount.

Historical data had high confidence for guest parking and current remarks across the listings continue to mention on-site paid parking and guest access. Multiple listings explicitly state 'guests and owners are able to use the garage with a reasonable fee' and others note 'paid parking', 'secured parking', or 'parking available for a fee (monthly $220)'. Evidence is consistent across several agent remarks rather than a single outlier, supporting that the building offers guest parking for a fee.

Secured parking is well-supported: MLS shows SECENT on 5 of 20 listings and multiple remarks directly mention 'secured parking' or 'on-site secure parking garage' (including notes about paid/garage parking with security). Evidence appears across listings and aligns with historical data, so include parking_secured_entry=true.

Despite detailed descriptions of the building’s parking garage, there is no reference to tandem-style stalls. The complete absence of such mentions and of TANDEM in MLS strongly suggests tandem parking is not a feature here.

Agents promote many hotel-like services (front desk, rental programs, etc.) but never refer to valet parking or attended parking, instead describing self-park paid garage use. This consistent omission indicates that valet parking is not offered.

The remarks discuss paid parking, garage access, and secured parking but do not describe a waitlist system. Because no current waitlist information is provided, this feature is treated as not evidenced.

Across all reviewed listings, there are no mentions of 'keyed elevator', 'fob elevator', or restricted elevator access. At the same time, 0/20 current MLS entries flag a keyed/secure elevator amenity. Given how thoroughly other amenities are promoted, the lack of any reference suggests the elevators are not a keyed or fob-access security feature.

The public remarks reference amenities, front desk services, and resort-style features but never mention card or fob-based access. I searched for terms such as key card access, fob access, card reader, and electronic entry and found no evidence, so this feature is assumed not present based on available information.

0 listings explicitly mention a security guard or on-site security personnel. Several listings mention a 24-hour front desk, front-desk check-in, or secured parking, but those are not security-guard service. With historically high confidence for absence and no confirming remarks across many agents, the current 8/20 checkbox entries appear likely to be MLS copy-paste errors.

While the remarks highlight 24-hour front desk and hotel-style management, there is no explicit reference to roving or patrol security services. I looked for phrases like security patrol, roving security, and patrolled building but found none, so this feature is set to false given the absence of evidence.

Dozens of remarks describing the building’s amenities never mention cameras, CCTV, or any kind of video security system. MLS data also shows 0/20 listings with a security system amenity checked. This consistent lack of both checkbox and narrative evidence makes it very unlikely that a distinct, building-level video security feature is present.

No listings (0/20) list central/ACCEN/CENAC in unit features and prior analysis had high confidence that central AC was not present. Current public remarks mention split AC and window A/C in several unit descriptions (e.g., "Split AC has also been installed", "window A/C unit", "new Split AC"), but contain no references to building-wide or central air conditioning. Evidence is consistent across multiple agent remarks and appears to describe in-unit systems rather than a central HVAC system.

At least four listings explicitly mention split AC, including units where it was newly installed during renovations and another with a 'new quiet and efficient split-air AC system.' ACSPL is also included in 10 of 20 current listings, providing support across multiple listings rather than relying only on a single copied remark; the feature should be included because at least some units offer split AC.

At least 9 of 20 recent MLS listings include ACWIUN in inclusions and multiple agent remarks explicitly reference window units (e.g., 'window A/C unit', 'newly replaced... window AC'). Several other listings note 'split AC' or 'new Split AC' showing active AC equipment across units. Evidence comes from multiple listings and agents rather than a single copy-paste entry, supporting that some units have window air conditioners.

Concrete construction is strongly supported by the current MLS data: 20 of 20 listings list CONCRE in construction materials. Remarks do not generally state the construction type explicitly, but one references completed "concrete spalling repairs," and the unanimous MLS consensus confirms the feature.

Three of 20 MLS listings flag double-wall construction, but double-wall is never mentioned in public remarks and mentions are sparse across agents. Given the limited but repeated MLS checkbox entries and absence of contradictory remarks, the feature is included with moderate confidence.

Hollow tile is not identified anywhere in the MLS construction fields for this building. In combination with its concrete high-rise description, there is insufficient evidence to consider hollow tile a defining construction type.

Four of 20 MLS listings include 'MASSTU' (masonry and stucco) in construction materials, but none of the public remarks reference masonry or stucco. This is moderate evidence—likely a minority/checkbox usage by some agents—so the feature is included with medium confidence.

There are zero MLS indications of steel frame construction and no textual references to it in any remarks. For this type of Waikiki concrete condotel, MLS would normally flag steel if it were a primary construction type, so it is treated as not applicable.

While the building almost certainly sits on a structural foundation, only one agent flagged SLAB in the MLS and no narrative remarks refer to a slab foundation. Given this sparse and inconsistent data, the specific 'construction_slab' feature is not considered a confirmed characteristic for this building.

No analysis available

Across 20 listings, agents never mark wood frame construction or reference it in remarks. Given the concrete high-rise nature of Pacific Monarch, wood-frame construction would be highly atypical, so this feature is excluded.

Three of 20 current listings identify above-ground construction, while none of the provided remarks explicitly use phrases such as “above ground construction” or describe above-ground materials. The evidence is weaker than for concrete and may partly reflect MLS data carryover, but the prior high-confidence determination and continued current checkbox entries support retaining the feature.

None of the listings describe or tag the building as brick-built. Given both the absence of MLS selections and the regional norm of concrete/stucco towers rather than brick high-rises, brick construction is ruled out.

There are no MLS or remarks references to single wall construction, which is generally associated with older low-rise homes rather than Waikiki towers. Given the building type and complete absence of SINWAL selections, single-wall construction is excluded with high confidence.

There is extensive, repeated confirmation that short-term rentals are permitted. The listings describe legal vacation rentals, resort-hotel zoning, daily rentals, Airbnb operation, and short-term-rental eligibility.

The building clearly participates in hotel rental pool programs. Listings reference Springboard Hospitality, OLS dba Springboard Hospitality, hotel management, and the Pacific Monarch Hotel Rental Pool.

Hotel rental pool participation is not mandatory. Owners may self-manage, use a third-party manager, or release the unit from the hotel program, so the mandatory-pool feature is false.

At least two different listings clearly state that their Pacific Monarch units are 'fee simple,' demonstrating that fee simple ownership exists in this building. While MLS tenure fields currently show no FS entries, these appear to be incomplete or unfilled, and the direct remarks confirm that some units are fee simple.

Remarks confirm that Pacific Monarch has both leasehold and fee simple units: at least one unit is described as leasehold with the fee available for purchase, and others are called fee simple. Thus, the building offers mixed tenure; based on remarks alone we see at least 1 LH and at least 2 FS listings, while MLS tenure checkboxes appear underreported.

The remarks include “Unit is leasehold and fee is available to purchase from AOAO” and describe leasehold units with fee-simple alternatives. No lease expiry, ground-lease end date, renewal year, or other specific 4-digit expiration year was found.

The remarks were searched for explicit VA-related language such as “VA approved,” “VA financing,” and “VA loans accepted.” None was found, so VA approval cannot be confirmed from the public remarks.

The public remarks contain no statements about HOA building insurance or walls-in coverage. Because no qualifying insurance language was found, fully insured is not supported.

Approximately 14 of 20 historical listings included the FIRSPR amenity, and one current listing explicitly says, "The building is sprinklered for fire protection." The combination of strong historical checkbox support and a direct building-level remark provides high confidence.

The remarks mention that the building is "sprinklered for fire protection," but this does not establish that a fire/life safety evaluation was passed. No qualifying FLSE or fire-safety certification language was found, so the feature is not supported.

Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.

No analysis available

Ocean views are strongly supported across the building: 15 of 20 current listings mention OCEAN, with 0 listings marked NONE. Multiple remarks from different listings explicitly cite “direct ocean views,” “magnificent ocean views,” “partial ocean view,” and panoramic Pacific Ocean views, so this is not limited to a single copied description.

Mountain views are confirmed for some units and common rooftop areas: 7 of 20 current listings contain MOUNTA, with no listings marked NONE. Remarks from multiple listings specifically cite “mountain views,” “Ko’olau Mountain Range,” “evergreen mountains,” and “ocean, mountain, and city” views.

Diamond Head views are supported by 6 of 20 current listings, with 0 listings marked NONE. Remarks independently identify “panoramic views of Diamond Head,” “Diamond Head side facing,” and units “facing Diamond Head,” providing strong evidence that some buyers can obtain this view.

City views are universally supported in the current data: 20 of 20 listings mention CITY and 0 list NONE. Multiple remarks explicitly describe city and skyline views, including “sweeping city and ocean views,” “city and partial ocean views,” and “Honolulu Cityscape,” although some references concern rooftop common areas.

No public remarks use the specific ‘coastline’/‘shoreline’ terminology even though many listings describe ocean/beach views; therefore there is insufficient evidence that the building should be labeled with a distinct coastline view—agents appear to have used ocean/shore proximity language instead.

Across many detailed listings, there are no references to 'garden view', 'courtyard view', or similar terminology, only to urban and water/mountain vistas. Given the tower-style design and marketing focus, garden views do not appear to be a building feature.

No explicit mentions of a golf course view in public remarks: listings reference Ala Wai Golf Course as nearby but do not say “golf course view,” “fairway view,” or similar. Given lack of explicit view statements across multiple listings, building should not be listed as offering golf-course views.

Limited but explicit evidence: one or a few listings explicitly reference views of the Ala Wai Canal/harbor (e.g., “VIEWS OF … ALA WAI CANAL”), and the building’s proximity to the Ala Wai waterway is noted—supporting that some units offer marina/canal views.

The marketing language never calls out sunrise-specific views despite extensively describing other view types and times of day. This consistent absence indicates that sunrise views are not a notable or promoted feature of the building.

Moderate-to-strong evidence for sunset views: several listings explicitly mention “sunsets” or rooftop sunset viewing (e.g., “panoramic ocean views and sunsets”), and SUNSET appears in MLS view_descriptions for a subset of units, indicating sunset-facing units exist.

No listing references any cemetery or 'cemetery view', and all described surroundings are beaches, city, mountains, and ocean. Given the location and marketing emphasis, it is highly unlikely that cemetery views are present or relevant for this building.

Listings frequently describe panoramic and ocean views, but none state that residents can watch the Friday night fireworks from the lanai, unit, or rooftop. Without explicit fireworks-view language, this feature is assumed not to be a notable attribute.

No analysis available

While no remarks actively advertise pet-friendliness, there are also no statements like “no pets allowed,” and 0/20 listings carry the NOPET restriction despite extensive cross‑agent marketing. This pattern implies the building does not have a blanket no‑pet rule, so buyers looking for pet‑permissive buildings would reasonably consider this property, albeit with some uncertainty about specific rules or limits.

Several listings across the dataset mention a 24-hour or staffed front desk, including "24-hour front desk" and "front desk check-in services," while 4 of 20 current listings check RESMAN. The evidence supports on-site staff and building management, but the remarks appear to describe front-desk hospitality service rather than explicitly confirming a resident manager.

Listings repeatedly refer to the building as a “short-term rental condotel,” “hotel condo,” and “one of Waikiki’s premier short-term rental condotels,” and note options like joining the “Pacific Monarch Hotel Rental Pool” or “Springboard Hospitality Rental Program.” The consistent mention of hotel-style management, front desk check-in, and daily rentals across many different agents confirms this is an operating condotel property.

Multiple listings specify “fee simple studio,” “fee simple,” and “leasehold unit, but the fee is available for purchase,” which are not co-op structures and instead match condo ownership. With no references to cooperative or co-op ownership and no COOTAX codes in MLS, this building is clearly not a cooperative (this is establishing, not correcting, the classification).