Pacific Monarch

MLS data is unanimous that Pacific Monarch was built in 1980, and the remarks only reference renovations to units and common areas, not new construction. With no contradictory textual evidence, 1980 is accepted as the building’s construction year with high confidence.

County assessor and state registration both report 34 floors. Listings reach only floor 32 with sparse high-floor coverage and no penthouse listings, so they do not establish the residential top floor; the stored 32 is therefore set aside.

The county's reconciled unit count and the state's authoritative registration total both report 218 units for this single-building record. The county dwell sum and state's secondary residential-units field are lower, but the reconciled and registration totals are the stronger figures.

The remarks were searched for an owner-occupancy percentage and phrases such as "80% owner occupied," "majority owner occupied," and "highly owner occupied," but none were found. Per the numeric-field rule, the current value of 4.00 is retained with low confidence.

The remarks were searched for explicit elevator counts and terms such as "4 elevators," "four elevators," or "multiple elevators," but none were found. Per the numeric-field rule, the current value of 3 is retained because there is no evidence in the remarks to confirm or deny it.

Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.

Listings repeatedly highlight individual split A/C or window A/C in specific units but never mention central air as a building utility or as part of the maintenance fee. Combined with the absence of the ACCEN checkbox in all current MLS records, this strongly indicates that central AC is not provided or included in the fees.

Cable inclusion is strongly supported by 19 of 20 current listings containing CABTV. Remarks explicitly state the fee includes “cable TV” and “basic cable TV,” confirming this is a building-level benefit rather than an isolated unit feature.

Common-area electricity is supported primarily by MLS data, appearing as OTCOEX in 14 of 20 current listings. Public remarks generally do not spell out common-area electricity, but the repeated MLS coding and prior high confidence support inclusion.

Remarks discuss fee simple versus leasehold and short-term rental eligibility but never mention cooperative ownership or co-op taxes. With no MLS entries marking co-op taxes as included, this is very clearly not a co-op building, so co-op taxes are not part of the maintenance fee.

Electricity inclusion is highly consistent, with 19 of 20 current listings containing ELECTR. Multiple remarks directly confirm that the maintenance fee includes electricity, including “maintenance fee includes electricity.”

Across many listings, utilities included in the maintenance fee are listed in detail, and gas is never mentioned, nor is there any sign of gas appliances. With the GAS checkbox absent in all MLS records, it is very likely that the building does not provide or include gas in the HOA fees.

Hot water inclusion is strongly supported by 19 of 20 HOTWAT entries and the complete absence of WTRHTR. Remarks explicitly say the fee includes “both hot and cold water” and “hot water,” confirming building-supplied hot water.

Internet service is consistently documented, appearing in 18 of 20 current listings. Remarks directly confirm inclusion through phrases such as “internet” and “basic internet,” supporting this as a building-wide fee benefit.

All descriptions focus on proximity to Waikiki Beach, shopping, and rooftop amenities, with no mention of docks or marina facilities. The complete absence of MARINA in MLS fee-includes fields strongly supports that marina access or fees are not part of the maintenance charge.

Sewer inclusion is one of the most consistent features, with SEWER listed in 19 of 20 current listings. Public remarks explicitly include “sewer” among the services covered by the maintenance fee, corroborating the MLS data.

Water inclusion is very strongly supported by 19 of 20 current listings. Remarks repeatedly state that the fee includes “water,” including detailed fee descriptions that list water alongside electricity, cable, internet, hot water, and sewer.

BBQ facilities are mentioned across many listings, including “BBQ area,” “BBQ grills,” “rooftop BBQ area,” and “barbecue area.” The repeated confirmations from multiple listing descriptions strongly support this as a building-level amenity rather than a copied isolated claim.

No listings mention bike storage or similar facilities, and MLS amenities never include a bike-storage checkbox. Given how extensively other amenities are advertised, the absence of any bike-related references suggests the building does not provide dedicated bicycle storage.

All location descriptions reference walking distance to Waikiki Beach, International Market Place, and urban attractions rather than any waterfront dock or marina. Given both the building’s inland setting and the absence of any boat-related amenities, it is certain there is no boat dock.

Although some listings mention a large parking garage and paid parking, none describe any car-wash amenity. This consistent omission, plus MLS data, makes it very likely there is no car wash facility.

Mixed evidence: only a few MLS checkboxes indicate 'club_house', while multiple remarks describe a penthouse/hospitality lounge or community lounge rather than a distinct clubhouse. Because some agents may use different terms interchangeably, inclusion is tentative (phrased as community/party space rather than a separate clubhouse).

Well over 10 listings describe a staffed front desk, including '24-hour front desk', 'front desk check-in services', and 'front desk service', clearly indicating concierge-type operations. This front desk is repeatedly presented as a core amenity for guests and owners. Despite sparse MLS checkbox use, narrative remarks from multiple independent agents confirm that concierge/front desk service is a real, building-level feature.

Given the thorough coverage of amenities in the remarks and the lack of any reference to pet-specific facilities, it is very unlikely that the building has a dog park or dog run. The MLS data is consistent with this absence.

Over 10 separate remarks refer to a front desk or front desk check-in, yet there are zero mentions of a doorman or lobby attendant. MLS data likewise shows no listings with a doorman amenity selected. This strongly indicates that staffing is organized as a front desk/concierge, not as a traditional doorman service.

No public remarks identify an exercise room or fitness facility across the provided listings. The feature appears in only 1 of 20 current MLS records, while repeated amenity descriptions focus on the rooftop pool, sauna, BBQ, and recreation facilities instead.

Despite frequent references to front desk and hotel rental pool management, there is no indication of any limousine or courtesy car service. The absence in both MLS and remarks strongly indicates no limo or house car service is offered.

Multiple listings confirm a shared meeting or hospitality space, including an "indoor Hospitality Suite with dining tables, lounge chairs, TV, pool table," a "community room," and a "party room." The repeated detailed descriptions across listings support a true building-level amenity.

At least 15 of 20 current listings carry PATDEC/COVPAT indicators, and numerous remarks explicitly describe rooftop decks, pool decks, recreation decks, outdoor dining spaces, and unit lanais. The feature is strongly corroborated across many listings and agents, including phrases such as “rooftop pool deck,” “rooftop recreation deck,” “recently renovated Rooftop Pool Deck,” and “spacious lanai,” indicating the building offers patio/deck amenities.

While agents note nearby attractions like Kapiolani Park and Waikiki Beach, there is no reference to a dedicated jogging or walking path within the building’s grounds. This, along with MLS data, indicates the building does not offer its own jogging path.

The building is presented as a resort-style condotel focused on adult and tourist amenities (pool, hot tub, sauna, BBQ, lounge), with no suggestion of children’s play structures. Combined with 0/20 MLS indications, this supports that there is no playground.

Across all provided remarks, outdoor space is described only as lanais/balconies and the shared rooftop recreation/pool deck; there is no mention of any private yard, fenced yard, or enclosed ground‑level yard area. With 0/20 MLS entries flagging a private yard and no textual evidence, this appears to be a building without yard amenities (not a correction of prior data, just confirmation of absence).

Agents highlight views of Ala Wai Golf Course nearby but do not mention any on-site putting green. The complete absence of such mentions, along with MLS data, makes it highly likely there is no putting green at the building.

Many listings describe shared recreational facilities, including a “rooftop recreation deck,” “recreation area,” “recreation room,” “recreation lounge,” and “rooftop community lounge.” The feature is consistently presented as a building amenity across multiple agents and listing versions.

The building clearly offers shared recreational space despite variation in checkbox usage. Remarks repeatedly mention a "rooftop recreation area," "enclosed recreation room," "recreation lounge," and "penthouse recreation room," often with a pool table or TV.

Mixed evidence: 15/20 MLS listings include a restaurant amenity (medium historical confidence), but none of the public remarks explicitly describe an on-site restaurant or dining facility. Remarks mention a hospitality suite with dining tables and many nearby restaurants, indicating agents may have checked the restaurant box inconsistently; inclusion retained because multiple MLS listings list it, but confidence is moderate due to lack of explicit remarks.

Dozens of listings independently describe extensive rooftop amenities, including one of Waikiki’s highest rooftop pools, hot tub, BBQ, and lounge areas, often with 360-degree views. This overwhelming textual evidence confirms shared rooftop amenities and rooftop access regardless of the MLS checkbox state.

Sauna is one of the most consistently documented amenities, appearing in repeated descriptions of the rooftop facilities and penthouse lounge or recreation area. Multiple listings state “sauna,” “rooftop sauna,” or “pool, hot tub, sauna,” providing exceptionally strong confirmation.

Evidence is limited but present: 1 of 20 current MLS listings has the storage amenity checked and one listing's public remarks explicitly says the unit includes "owner storage." Mentions are isolated (appear in a single listing rather than across multiple agents), but the explicit remark plus the MLS checkbox indicate the building does offer storage lockers/owner storage.

Multiple listings describe a wide range of building amenities (rooftop pool, jacuzzi, sauna, BBQ area, recreation room, community laundry, parking, front desk) but none reference any surfboard-specific storage. I searched for terms like 'surfboard storage', 'board storage', 'surf storage', and 'bike and surfboard storage' and found no matches, so the building is assumed not to offer dedicated surfboard storage based on current public information.

The extensive amenity descriptions focus on rooftop pool/whirlpool, BBQ, sauna, and recreation rooms with no mention of tennis. Combined with 0/20 MLS selections, this strongly indicates there is no tennis court at the building.

Although trash chute is mentioned less often in public remarks than the recreational amenities, one listing explicitly identifies a “trash chute,” and 19 of 20 current MLS records mark the feature. The strong current MLS consensus and explicit confirmation support including it.

Multiple listings reference parking as paid, secured, or available for a monthly/daily fee but never use the terms “valet” or “valet parking.” Combined with 0/20 MLS valet flags, the evidence strongly supports that parking is self‑park in a garage, not valet (again, this is not correcting a prior true flag, just establishing absence).

Across many detailed descriptions of the building and its amenities, there is no reference to a gated entry, fenced grounds, perimeter wall, or similar physical enclosure. MLS amenity data likewise shows no gated or wall/fence features selected. This strongly suggests the property is an open streetfront high-rise rather than a walled or gated compound.

Whirlpool facilities are repeatedly confirmed with phrases such as “rooftop whirlpool,” “hot tub,” “jacuzzi,” and “rooftop pool and whirlpool.” The extensive agreement between MLS data and remarks demonstrates a strong, current building-level amenity.

The pool is explicitly mentioned in well over 20 listings across numerous agents, most commonly as a shared rooftop or resort-style pool. Repeated descriptions include 'rooftop pool,' 'swimming pool,' 'sparkling pool,' and 'one of Waikiki's highest rooftop pools,' strongly confirming that Pacific Monarch offers this building amenity.

A heated-pool designation appears in 6 of 20 current MLS records, but the public remarks consistently describe the pool separately from a "hot tub," "jacuzzi," or "whirlpool" and do not use the phrase "heated pool." This is therefore plausible from MLS amenity coding but only moderately supported by remarks and may reflect checkbox or copied data.

The public remarks repeatedly mention a rooftop pool, swimming pool, and jacuzzi/hot tub, but never describe the pool as salt water, saltwater, saline, or similar. Given the complete absence of such descriptors across many listings, the pool is assumed not to be a salt water pool, though this cannot be confirmed with high certainty from the remarks alone.

No public remarks in the supplied listings mention 'washer/dryer in unit', 'in-unit laundry', or similar. Current MLS checkboxes show WASHER/DRYER in only 2 of 20 listings, but the remarks (0 mentions) and prior high-confidence history indicate this is likely an agent data error rather than actual in-unit laundry.

Community laundry is strongly confirmed across multiple agents and listing versions. At least 8 listings explicitly mention shared laundry, using phrases such as “community laundry,” “Community Laundry Room,” and “community laundry room on the 3rd floor,” while 19/20 current MLS records include COMLAU.

The remarks confirm the presence of community laundry but provide no details on whether it is free or paid. Since there are no terms like 'coin-op', 'card-operated', or 'paid laundry', the paid status cannot be confirmed and is set to false by default with low confidence.

Multiple listings describe a shared community laundry located on the 3rd floor, implying a centralized facility rather than laundry on every floor. No phrasing such as 'laundry on each floor' or 'laundry room on every floor' appears in the remarks.

At least 10 current listing remarks mention building parking, including “one of the larger parking garages in Waikiki,” “secured parking,” “paid parking is available,” and “parking available for a monthly $220 fee.” The repeated references across multiple agents and the prior high-confidence evidence outweigh the inconsistent MLS checkbox entries, which likely reflect copy-paste or unit-level parking availability differences.

Listings refer to parking only as paid garage use (e.g. daily or monthly fees) with no wording like 'assigned' or 'deeded stall.' Combined with the absence of ASSIGN in current MLS data, this strongly suggests there is no assigned parking for units.

Covered parking is strongly supported across multiple current listings, with at least 8 of 20 MLS records indicating covered parking and numerous independent remarks describing a parking garage or secured parking. Key phrases include "larger parking garage in Waikiki," "enclosed recreation" alongside "paid parking ... in the building's parking garage," and "secured parking," confirming the feature is a building amenity rather than isolated copy-paste.

The remarks consistently describe parking as paid garage access rather than parking owned with or included in the unit deed. No listing states that a deeded, owned, or included parking stall conveys with the unit.

Across all compiled remarks there are detailed descriptions of amenities and parking, but nothing about EV charging or electric vehicle stations. Given the explicit omission in both text and MLS checkboxes, EV parking is very unlikely to be present.

The public remarks provide a specific recurring parking charge of $220 per month. Other listings corroborate that parking is paid or available for a fee.

Guest parking remains supported, though less frequently documented than covered parking. Two of 20 current MLS records include the GUEST feature, and multiple remarks state that guests can use the garage or that parking is available for guests and owners, confirming building-level guest access.

Secured parking is well-supported: MLS shows SECENT on 5 of 20 listings and multiple remarks directly mention 'secured parking' or 'on-site secure parking garage' (including notes about paid/garage parking with security). Evidence appears across listings and aligns with historical data, so include parking_secured_entry=true.

Despite detailed descriptions of the building’s parking garage, there is no reference to tandem-style stalls. The complete absence of such mentions and of TANDEM in MLS strongly suggests tandem parking is not a feature here.

Agents promote many hotel-like services (front desk, rental programs, etc.) but never refer to valet parking or attended parking, instead describing self-park paid garage use. This consistent omission indicates that valet parking is not offered.

The remarks discuss secured parking, garage parking, paid parking, and monthly parking fees. They do not mention a parking waitlist or limited availability requiring an application.

Across all reviewed listings, there are no mentions of 'keyed elevator', 'fob elevator', or restricted elevator access. At the same time, 0/20 current MLS entries flag a keyed/secure elevator amenity. Given how thoroughly other amenities are promoted, the lack of any reference suggests the elevators are not a keyed or fob-access security feature.

The public remarks reference amenities, front desk services, and resort-style features but never mention card or fob-based access. I searched for terms such as key card access, fob access, card reader, and electronic entry and found no evidence, so this feature is assumed not present based on available information.

0 listings explicitly mention a security guard or on-site security personnel. Several listings mention a 24-hour front desk, front desk service, or front-desk check-in, but these do not establish guard service; the 9/20 MLS SECGUA entries appear unsupported by the remarks and likely reflect checkbox copy-paste.

While the remarks highlight 24-hour front desk and hotel-style management, there is no explicit reference to roving or patrol security services. I looked for phrases like security patrol, roving security, and patrolled building but found none, so this feature is set to false given the absence of evidence.

Dozens of remarks describing the building’s amenities never mention cameras, CCTV, or any kind of video security system. MLS data also shows 0/20 listings with a security system amenity checked. This consistent lack of both checkbox and narrative evidence makes it very unlikely that a distinct, building-level video security feature is present.

No listings (0/20) list central/ACCEN/CENAC in unit features and prior analysis had high confidence that central AC was not present. Current public remarks mention split AC and window A/C in several unit descriptions (e.g., "Split AC has also been installed", "window A/C unit", "new Split AC"), but contain no references to building-wide or central air conditioning. Evidence is consistent across multiple agent remarks and appears to describe in-unit systems rather than a central HVAC system.

At least 4 listings explicitly mention split AC, including repeated remarks stating “Split AC has also been installed” during a 2023 renovation, a “new quiet and efficient split-air AC system,” and “new Split AC.” This is strong multi-listing evidence rather than an isolated checkbox or apparent copy-paste error; split AC should be included as a feature available in the building.

At least 9 of 20 recent MLS listings include ACWIUN in inclusions and multiple agent remarks explicitly reference window units (e.g., 'window A/C unit', 'newly replaced... window AC'). Several other listings note 'split AC' or 'new Split AC' showing active AC equipment across units. Evidence comes from multiple listings and agents rather than a single copy-paste entry, supporting that some units have window air conditioners.

Concrete construction is consistently supported across all 20 current listings, with 20/20 identifying CONCRE in the construction materials field. One remark specifically notes that recent concrete spalling repairs were completed, reinforcing that the building has concrete structural components.

Three of 20 MLS listings flag double-wall construction, but double-wall is never mentioned in public remarks and mentions are sparse across agents. Given the limited but repeated MLS checkbox entries and absence of contradictory remarks, the feature is included with moderate confidence.

Hollow tile is not identified anywhere in the MLS construction fields for this building. In combination with its concrete high-rise description, there is insufficient evidence to consider hollow tile a defining construction type.

Four of 20 MLS listings include 'MASSTU' (masonry and stucco) in construction materials, but none of the public remarks reference masonry or stucco. This is moderate evidence—likely a minority/checkbox usage by some agents—so the feature is included with medium confidence.

There are zero MLS indications of steel frame construction and no textual references to it in any remarks. For this type of Waikiki concrete condotel, MLS would normally flag steel if it were a primary construction type, so it is treated as not applicable.

While the building almost certainly sits on a structural foundation, only one agent flagged SLAB in the MLS and no narrative remarks refer to a slab foundation. Given this sparse and inconsistent data, the specific 'construction_slab' feature is not considered a confirmed characteristic for this building.

No analysis available

Across 20 listings, agents never mark wood frame construction or reference it in remarks. Given the concrete high-rise nature of Pacific Monarch, wood-frame construction would be highly atypical, so this feature is excluded.

Five of 20 current listings identify above-ground construction through the ABOGRO materials code. No public remarks explicitly mention above-ground construction or materials, making this a moderate-confidence feature based primarily on MLS checkbox data rather than independently verified remarks.

None of the listings describe or tag the building as brick-built. Given both the absence of MLS selections and the regional norm of concrete/stucco towers rather than brick high-rises, brick construction is ruled out.

There are no MLS or remarks references to single wall construction, which is generally associated with older low-rise homes rather than Waikiki towers. Given the building type and complete absence of SINWAL selections, single-wall construction is excluded with high confidence.

There is extensive, repeated confirmation that short-term rentals are permitted. Listings describe legal vacation rentals, resort-hotel zoning, daily rentals, Airbnb operation, and short-term-rental eligibility.

The building clearly participates in hotel rental pool programs. Multiple listings state that units are currently in the hotel pool or rental program, including programs managed by Springboard Hospitality and OLS.

Hotel rental pool participation is not mandatory. Owners may self-manage, use another manager, release the unit from the program, or retain personal use, so the remarks explicitly contradict a required rental-pool obligation.

At least two different listings clearly state that their Pacific Monarch units are 'fee simple,' demonstrating that fee simple ownership exists in this building. While MLS tenure fields currently show no FS entries, these appear to be incomplete or unfilled, and the direct remarks confirm that some units are fee simple.

Remarks confirm that Pacific Monarch has both leasehold and fee simple units: at least one unit is described as leasehold with the fee available for purchase, and others are called fee simple. Thus, the building offers mixed tenure; based on remarks alone we see at least 1 LH and at least 2 FS listings, while MLS tenure checkboxes appear underreported.

Several listings identify some units as leasehold and state that the fee interest is available for purchase. No 4-digit lease-expiration year or renewal date was found, so the expiry year remains unknown.

The remarks were searched for explicit VA-related terms, including “VA approved,” “VA financing,” and “VA loans accepted.” None were found, so VA approval cannot be confirmed from the public remarks.

The remarks were searched for explicit insurance language including "fully insured," "full insurance," "comprehensive building insurance," and "walls-in coverage," but none was found. There is no current verified true value, so full HOA insurance coverage cannot be confirmed.

Approximately 14 of 20 historical listings included the FIRSPR amenity, and one current listing explicitly says, "The building is sprinklered for fire protection." The combination of strong historical checkbox support and a direct building-level remark provides high confidence.

The remarks include a fire-protection reference but no explicit statement such as "fire life safety evaluation passed," "FLSE passed," "fire safety certified," or "passed fire inspection." Sprinklering alone does not establish that the FLSE was passed, so the feature is not confirmed.

Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.

No analysis available

Ocean views are strongly supported across the building: 15 of 20 current listings mention OCEAN, and 0 mention NONE. Remarks from multiple listings and agents explicitly describe direct, panoramic, partial, and rooftop Pacific Ocean views, confirming this is a building feature offered by some units.

Mountain views are confirmed for the building, with 8 of 20 current listings mentioning MOUNTA and 0 marked NONE. Independent remarks describe views of the mountains and Ko’olau Mountain Range, including “breathtaking views of the ocean, mountains, and city” and panoramic rooftop vistas.

Diamond Head views are supported by 6 of 20 current listings, with 0 marked NONE. Remarks from multiple listings specifically mention “sweeping panoramic views of Diamond Head,” Diamond Head-facing units, and rooftop views of Diamond Head, so the feature should remain included.

City views are universally supported: 20 of 20 current listings mention CITY, and 0 are marked NONE. Remarks repeatedly reference “city skyline,” “city lights,” “city views,” and “Honolulu Cityscape,” demonstrating strong building-wide support rather than a single isolated claim.

No public remarks use the specific ‘coastline’/‘shoreline’ terminology even though many listings describe ocean/beach views; therefore there is insufficient evidence that the building should be labeled with a distinct coastline view—agents appear to have used ocean/shore proximity language instead.

Across many detailed listings, there are no references to 'garden view', 'courtyard view', or similar terminology, only to urban and water/mountain vistas. Given the tower-style design and marketing focus, garden views do not appear to be a building feature.

No explicit mentions of a golf course view in public remarks: listings reference Ala Wai Golf Course as nearby but do not say “golf course view,” “fairway view,” or similar. Given lack of explicit view statements across multiple listings, building should not be listed as offering golf-course views.

Limited but explicit evidence: one or a few listings explicitly reference views of the Ala Wai Canal/harbor (e.g., “VIEWS OF … ALA WAI CANAL”), and the building’s proximity to the Ala Wai waterway is noted—supporting that some units offer marina/canal views.

The marketing language never calls out sunrise-specific views despite extensively describing other view types and times of day. This consistent absence indicates that sunrise views are not a notable or promoted feature of the building.

Moderate-to-strong evidence for sunset views: several listings explicitly mention “sunsets” or rooftop sunset viewing (e.g., “panoramic ocean views and sunsets”), and SUNSET appears in MLS view_descriptions for a subset of units, indicating sunset-facing units exist.

No listing references any cemetery or 'cemetery view', and all described surroundings are beaches, city, mountains, and ocean. Given the location and marketing emphasis, it is highly unlikely that cemetery views are present or relevant for this building.

Listings frequently describe panoramic and ocean views, but none state that residents can watch the Friday night fireworks from the lanai, unit, or rooftop. Without explicit fireworks-view language, this feature is assumed not to be a notable attribute.

No analysis available

While no remarks actively advertise pet-friendliness, there are also no statements like “no pets allowed,” and 0/20 listings carry the NOPET restriction despite extensive cross‑agent marketing. This pattern implies the building does not have a blanket no‑pet rule, so buyers looking for pet‑permissive buildings would reasonably consider this property, albeit with some uncertainty about specific rules or limits.

Several listings across the dataset mention a 24-hour or staffed front desk, including "24-hour front desk" and "front desk check-in services," while 4 of 20 current listings check RESMAN. The evidence supports on-site staff and building management, but the remarks appear to describe front-desk hospitality service rather than explicitly confirming a resident manager.

Listings repeatedly refer to the building as a “short-term rental condotel,” “hotel condo,” and “one of Waikiki’s premier short-term rental condotels,” and note options like joining the “Pacific Monarch Hotel Rental Pool” or “Springboard Hospitality Rental Program.” The consistent mention of hotel-style management, front desk check-in, and daily rentals across many different agents confirms this is an operating condotel property.

Multiple listings specify “fee simple studio,” “fee simple,” and “leasehold unit, but the fee is available for purchase,” which are not co-op structures and instead match condo ownership. With no references to cooperative or co-op ownership and no COOTAX codes in MLS, this building is clearly not a cooperative (this is establishing, not correcting, the classification).