Pacific Monarch

MLS data is unanimous that Pacific Monarch was built in 1980, and the remarks only reference renovations to units and common areas, not new construction. With no contradictory textual evidence, 1980 is accepted as the building’s construction year with high confidence.

Listings reference units as high as the 31st and 32nd floors and describe rooftop and penthouse amenities above or at these levels, but no remark states an exact story count (e.g., '34-story'). Given no contrary evidence, the building is assumed to have 32 floors matching the highest documented residential floor. Future data with an explicit 'X-story' description could refine this further.

None of the analyzed remarks include any reference to how many units exist in Pacific Monarch as a whole, only individual unit descriptions. Because MLS NumberOfUnitsTotal is 0 (a known placeholder) and no textual evidence provides a building-wide unit count, the actual total units remain unknown based on current data.

I looked for explicit owner-occupancy statements or percentages in the remarks, but none were present. The current value of 4.00 is kept because there is no remark-based evidence to change it.

I searched the public remarks for explicit elevator counts or phrases implying multiple elevators, but found none. Per the rules, the current value of 3 is retained because there is no remark-based evidence to confirm or override it, even though a 32-story building would typically have several elevators.

Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.

Listings repeatedly highlight individual split A/C or window A/C in specific units but never mention central air as a building utility or as part of the maintenance fee. Combined with the absence of the ACCEN checkbox in all current MLS records, this strongly indicates that central AC is not provided or included in the fees.

Cable TV inclusion is strongly supported at the building level. The current MLS data shows CABTV in 18 of 20 listings, and remarks explicitly state “maintenance fee includes ... cable” and “basic cable TV,” which is consistent across multiple listings and agents.

Common-area electricity is supported by the MLS inclusion code OTCOEX appearing in 13 of 20 listings. While remarks are less explicit than for utilities like water/electricity, several listings reference common-area renovations and building operations, which fits this inclusion code.

Remarks discuss fee simple versus leasehold and short-term rental eligibility but never mention cooperative ownership or co-op taxes. With no MLS entries marking co-op taxes as included, this is very clearly not a co-op building, so co-op taxes are not part of the maintenance fee.

Electricity is clearly included in the maintenance fee. The MLS data shows ELECTR in 18 of 20 listings, and at least one remark explicitly lists “electricity” among included maintenance items, making this a high-confidence building-level feature.

Across many listings, utilities included in the maintenance fee are listed in detail, and gas is never mentioned, nor is there any sign of gas appliances. With the GAS checkbox absent in all MLS records, it is very likely that the building does not provide or include gas in the HOA fees.

Hot water appears to be included consistently across the building. The MLS shows HOTWAT in 18 of 20 listings, and remarks explicitly say maintenance fees include “hot water” and “both hot and cold water,” with no evidence of unit-level water heaters overriding that.

Internet service is strongly supported as included in the fees. The MLS shows INTSER in 18 of 20 listings, and remarks explicitly mention “internet” and “basic internet,” indicating this is a building-level amenity rather than a one-off agent checkbox.

All descriptions focus on proximity to Waikiki Beach, shopping, and rooftop amenities, with no mention of docks or marina facilities. The complete absence of MARINA in MLS fee-includes fields strongly supports that marina access or fees are not part of the maintenance charge.

Sewer inclusion is one of the most consistent features in the building. The current MLS data shows SEWER in 19 of 20 listings, and remarks explicitly list sewer among the fee inclusions, making this very high confidence.

Water is clearly included in the maintenance fee. The MLS shows WATER in 19 of 20 listings, and remarks repeatedly confirm water inclusion, including phrases like “maintenance fee includes ... water” and “both hot and cold water.”

Strong building-level evidence for BBQ facilities. Across many listings, remarks explicitly mention phrases like “BBQ area,” “recreation area with BBQ grills,” and “barbecue area,” which appears consistent across multiple agents rather than a one-off copy-paste. Historical MLS data is also very strong, so this feature should be retained.

No listings mention bike storage or similar facilities, and MLS amenities never include a bike-storage checkbox. Given how extensively other amenities are advertised, the absence of any bike-related references suggests the building does not provide dedicated bicycle storage.

All location descriptions reference walking distance to Waikiki Beach, International Market Place, and urban attractions rather than any waterfront dock or marina. Given both the building’s inland setting and the absence of any boat-related amenities, it is certain there is no boat dock.

Although some listings mention a large parking garage and paid parking, none describe any car-wash amenity. This consistent omission, plus MLS data, makes it very likely there is no car wash facility.

Mixed evidence: only a few MLS checkboxes indicate 'club_house', while multiple remarks describe a penthouse/hospitality lounge or community lounge rather than a distinct clubhouse. Because some agents may use different terms interchangeably, inclusion is tentative (phrased as community/party space rather than a separate clubhouse).

Well over 10 listings describe a staffed front desk, including '24-hour front desk', 'front desk check-in services', and 'front desk service', clearly indicating concierge-type operations. This front desk is repeatedly presented as a core amenity for guests and owners. Despite sparse MLS checkbox use, narrative remarks from multiple independent agents confirm that concierge/front desk service is a real, building-level feature.

Given the thorough coverage of amenities in the remarks and the lack of any reference to pet-specific facilities, it is very unlikely that the building has a dog park or dog run. The MLS data is consistent with this absence.

Over 10 separate remarks refer to a front desk or front desk check-in, yet there are zero mentions of a doorman or lobby attendant. MLS data likewise shows no listings with a doorman amenity selected. This strongly indicates that staffing is organized as a front desk/concierge, not as a traditional doorman service.

Across all provided remarks, amenities are described in detail (rooftop pool, hot tub, BBQ, sauna, recreation room), but no listing mentions a gym or fitness center. With 18/20 MLS records not checking an exercise room and zero textual confirmation, it is very likely the building does not offer a shared exercise room.

Despite frequent references to front desk and hotel rental pool management, there is no indication of any limousine or courtesy car service. The absence in both MLS and remarks strongly indicates no limo or house car service is offered.

Multiple listings reference an indoor shared room such as “adjacent indoor Hospitality Suite with dining tables,” “large Hospitality Suite,” “community room,” and “recreation room” with seating and entertainment. While wording varies, the evidence consistently supports a building-level meeting/community room amenity.

Strong building-level evidence for patio/deck amenities. Across the listings, many agents mention outdoor spaces such as a "lanai," "balcony," "open-air balcony," and "rooftop recreation deck/pool deck," appearing in well over a dozen remarks. The consistency across multiple listings suggests this is a real shared amenity and not just MLS copy-paste noise.

While agents note nearby attractions like Kapiolani Park and Waikiki Beach, there is no reference to a dedicated jogging or walking path within the building’s grounds. This, along with MLS data, indicates the building does not offer its own jogging path.

The building is presented as a resort-style condotel focused on adult and tourist amenities (pool, hot tub, sauna, BBQ, lounge), with no suggestion of children’s play structures. Combined with 0/20 MLS indications, this supports that there is no playground.

Across all provided remarks, outdoor space is described only as lanais/balconies and the shared rooftop recreation/pool deck; there is no mention of any private yard, fenced yard, or enclosed ground‑level yard area. With 0/20 MLS entries flagging a private yard and no textual evidence, this appears to be a building without yard amenities (not a correction of prior data, just confirmation of absence).

Agents highlight views of Ala Wai Golf Course nearby but do not mention any on-site putting green. The complete absence of such mentions, along with MLS data, makes it highly likely there is no putting green at the building.

There is repeated evidence that the building has a shared recreation amenity. Listings describe a “rooftop recreation deck,” “recreation area,” “recreation room,” and “recreation lounge,” often alongside pool/BBQ/sauna amenities. The volume and consistency across listings support this as a building feature.

Solid evidence: 11/20 MLS listings flag recreation room and numerous remarks reference 'recreation room', 'penthouse recreation room', 'rooftop recreation deck' or 'recreation area' (e.g., 'penthouse recreation room', 'rooftop recreation deck'). Mentions appear across multiple agent remarks, confirming a common shared amenity.

Mixed evidence: 15/20 MLS listings include a restaurant amenity (medium historical confidence), but none of the public remarks explicitly describe an on-site restaurant or dining facility. Remarks mention a hospitality suite with dining tables and many nearby restaurants, indicating agents may have checked the restaurant box inconsistently; inclusion retained because multiple MLS listings list it, but confidence is moderate due to lack of explicit remarks.

Dozens of listings independently describe extensive rooftop amenities, including one of Waikiki’s highest rooftop pools, hot tub, BBQ, and lounge areas, often with 360-degree views. This overwhelming textual evidence confirms shared rooftop amenities and rooftop access regardless of the MLS checkbox state.

Sauna is one of the most consistently documented amenities for this building. Remarks across many listings mention “sauna” in different contexts, including rooftop, penthouse, and lounge-area references. Combined with strong MLS history, this is highly reliable.

Evidence is limited but present: 1 of 20 current MLS listings has the storage amenity checked and one listing's public remarks explicitly says the unit includes "owner storage." Mentions are isolated (appear in a single listing rather than across multiple agents), but the explicit remark plus the MLS checkbox indicate the building does offer storage lockers/owner storage.

Multiple listings describe a wide range of building amenities (rooftop pool, jacuzzi, sauna, BBQ area, recreation room, community laundry, parking, front desk) but none reference any surfboard-specific storage. I searched for terms like 'surfboard storage', 'board storage', 'surf storage', and 'bike and surfboard storage' and found no matches, so the building is assumed not to offer dedicated surfboard storage based on current public information.

The extensive amenity descriptions focus on rooftop pool/whirlpool, BBQ, sauna, and recreation rooms with no mention of tennis. Combined with 0/20 MLS selections, this strongly indicates there is no tennis court at the building.

Direct remark evidence is limited, but there is an explicit mention of “trash chute,” which aligns with the strong MLS history. Because the checkbox history is very consistent and there is at least one clear textual confirmation, this feature should remain true with high confidence.

Multiple listings reference parking as paid, secured, or available for a monthly/daily fee but never use the terms “valet” or “valet parking.” Combined with 0/20 MLS valet flags, the evidence strongly supports that parking is self‑park in a garage, not valet (again, this is not correcting a prior true flag, just establishing absence).

Across many detailed descriptions of the building and its amenities, there is no reference to a gated entry, fenced grounds, perimeter wall, or similar physical enclosure. MLS amenity data likewise shows no gated or wall/fence features selected. This strongly suggests the property is an open streetfront high-rise rather than a walled or gated compound.

Whirlpool/hot tub is directly supported by many public remarks. Listings repeatedly describe a rooftop “whirlpool,” “jacuzzi,” and “hot tub,” usually as part of the same amenity set with pool and sauna. This is strong, consistent evidence across the listing history.

Pool is strongly supported. Dozens of current remarks mention a "rooftop pool," "swimming pool," or "roof top pool deck," often alongside jacuzzi and sauna, indicating a shared building amenity rather than a unit-only feature. Historical MLS data is fully consistent (20/20 listings with pool-related amenities), so there is no sign of a change or copy-paste error here.

0 of 20 listing remarks explicitly state "heated pool"; numerous listings mention a "hot tub," "jacuzzi," or "whirlpool" but never a "heated pool." A few MLS amenity checkboxes (5/20) flag HEAPOO but without remark confirmation, so the weight of evidence indicates the pool is not described or marketed as heated.

The public remarks repeatedly mention a rooftop pool, swimming pool, and jacuzzi/hot tub, but never describe the pool as salt water, saltwater, saline, or similar. Given the complete absence of such descriptors across many listings, the pool is assumed not to be a salt water pool, though this cannot be confirmed with high certainty from the remarks alone.

No public remarks in the supplied listings mention 'washer/dryer in unit', 'in-unit laundry', or similar. Current MLS checkboxes show WASHER/DRYER in only 2 of 20 listings, but the remarks (0 mentions) and prior high-confidence history indicate this is likely an agent data error rather than actual in-unit laundry.

There is overwhelming evidence that Pacific Monarch has shared/community laundry facilities. Across the remarks, multiple listings explicitly say 'Community Laundry Room,' 'community laundry,' or note a 'laundry room on the 3rd floor,' confirming the amenity at the building level. The MLS data is also perfectly consistent (20/20 listings with COMLAU), so confidence is very high.

The remarks confirm the presence of community laundry but provide no details on whether it is free or paid. Since there are no terms like 'coin-op', 'card-operated', or 'paid laundry', the paid status cannot be confirmed and is set to false by default with low confidence.

Multiple listings describe a shared community laundry located on the 3rd floor, implying a centralized facility rather than laundry on every floor. No phrasing such as 'laundry on each floor' or 'laundry room on every floor' appears in the remarks.

Evidence is strong that the building offers on-site parking: at least a dozen current listing remarks explicitly mention parking (phrases include "parking available for a fee", "on-site secure parking garage", and "paid parking is available in the building's parking garage"). Although some MLS parking checkboxes are unset, repeated remarks across multiple agents confirm a garage/paid parking option for owners and guests, so parking should be included.

Listings refer to parking only as paid garage use (e.g. daily or monthly fees) with no wording like 'assigned' or 'deeded stall.' Combined with the absence of ASSIGN in current MLS data, this strongly suggests there is no assigned parking for units.

Covered parking is strongly supported for Pacific Monarch. Across the provided remarks, numerous listings mention a "parking garage," "secured parking," or "parking available for a fee," including descriptions that guests and owners can use the garage. The evidence is consistent across multiple listings and appears to be repeated by different agents rather than a one-off copy-paste error.

I searched for phrases indicating deeded or owned parking, such as 'deeded parking,' 'owned stall,' or 'parking included in deed,' and found no matches. The available references point to fee-based or secured garage parking, which does not indicate deeded parking.

Across all compiled remarks there are detailed descriptions of amenities and parking, but nothing about EV charging or electric vehicle stations. Given the explicit omission in both text and MLS checkboxes, EV parking is very unlikely to be present.

I looked for monthly parking charges or rental fees in the remarks and found a direct dollar amount. Since the listings explicitly state a monthly $220 parking fee, that is the value used.

Historical data had high confidence for guest parking and current remarks across the listings continue to mention on-site paid parking and guest access. Multiple listings explicitly state 'guests and owners are able to use the garage with a reasonable fee' and others note 'paid parking', 'secured parking', or 'parking available for a fee (monthly $220)'. Evidence is consistent across several agent remarks rather than a single outlier, supporting that the building offers guest parking for a fee.

Secured parking is well-supported: MLS shows SECENT on 5 of 20 listings and multiple remarks directly mention 'secured parking' or 'on-site secure parking garage' (including notes about paid/garage parking with security). Evidence appears across listings and aligns with historical data, so include parking_secured_entry=true.

Despite detailed descriptions of the building’s parking garage, there is no reference to tandem-style stalls. The complete absence of such mentions and of TANDEM in MLS strongly suggests tandem parking is not a feature here.

Agents promote many hotel-like services (front desk, rental programs, etc.) but never refer to valet parking or attended parking, instead describing self-park paid garage use. This consistent omission indicates that valet parking is not offered.

I searched for 'parking waitlist,' 'waiting list,' and similar wording and found nothing. The remarks mention parking being available for a fee, but do not describe any waitlist process.

Across all reviewed listings, there are no mentions of 'keyed elevator', 'fob elevator', or restricted elevator access. At the same time, 0/20 current MLS entries flag a keyed/secure elevator amenity. Given how thoroughly other amenities are promoted, the lack of any reference suggests the elevators are not a keyed or fob-access security feature.

The public remarks reference amenities, front desk services, and resort-style features but never mention card or fob-based access. I searched for terms such as key card access, fob access, card reader, and electronic entry and found no evidence, so this feature is assumed not present based on available information.

Security guard service appears in the current MLS amenity data for 7 of 20 listings, but none of the public remarks explicitly describe a security guard or 24-hour security. Several remarks mention front desk service and secured parking, which may reflect controlled access, but the evidence in remarks looks more like copy-pasted amenity text than firsthand confirmation of guard staffing.

While the remarks highlight 24-hour front desk and hotel-style management, there is no explicit reference to roving or patrol security services. I looked for phrases like security patrol, roving security, and patrolled building but found none, so this feature is set to false given the absence of evidence.

Dozens of remarks describing the building’s amenities never mention cameras, CCTV, or any kind of video security system. MLS data also shows 0/20 listings with a security system amenity checked. This consistent lack of both checkbox and narrative evidence makes it very unlikely that a distinct, building-level video security feature is present.

No listings (0/20) list central/ACCEN/CENAC in unit features and prior analysis had high confidence that central AC was not present. Current public remarks mention split AC and window A/C in several unit descriptions (e.g., "Split AC has also been installed", "window A/C unit", "new Split AC"), but contain no references to building-wide or central air conditioning. Evidence is consistent across multiple agent remarks and appears to describe in-unit systems rather than a central HVAC system.

Split AC is strongly supported across the listing history and current public remarks. At least 3 listings explicitly mention it with clear language such as 'Split AC has also been installed,' 'new quiet and efficient split-air AC system,' and 'new Split AC,' which indicates this is not just a copy-paste checkbox. The historical MLS inclusion aligns with the remarks, so this feature should be retained with very high confidence.

At least 9 of 20 recent MLS listings include ACWIUN in inclusions and multiple agent remarks explicitly reference window units (e.g., 'window A/C unit', 'newly replaced... window AC'). Several other listings note 'split AC' or 'new Split AC' showing active AC equipment across units. Evidence comes from multiple listings and agents rather than a single copy-paste entry, supporting that some units have window air conditioners.

Strong building-level consensus: 20/20 current MLS listings identify the construction material as concrete (CONCRE). The remarks across many agents focus on the same Pacific Monarch building and do not contradict this; the repeated language suggests the MLS entry is a stable building-level fact rather than a one-off unit note.

Three of 20 MLS listings flag double-wall construction, but double-wall is never mentioned in public remarks and mentions are sparse across agents. Given the limited but repeated MLS checkbox entries and absence of contradictory remarks, the feature is included with moderate confidence.

Hollow tile is not identified anywhere in the MLS construction fields for this building. In combination with its concrete high-rise description, there is insufficient evidence to consider hollow tile a defining construction type.

Four of 20 MLS listings include 'MASSTU' (masonry and stucco) in construction materials, but none of the public remarks reference masonry or stucco. This is moderate evidence—likely a minority/checkbox usage by some agents—so the feature is included with medium confidence.

There are zero MLS indications of steel frame construction and no textual references to it in any remarks. For this type of Waikiki concrete condotel, MLS would normally flag steel if it were a primary construction type, so it is treated as not applicable.

While the building almost certainly sits on a structural foundation, only one agent flagged SLAB in the MLS and no narrative remarks refer to a slab foundation. Given this sparse and inconsistent data, the specific 'construction_slab' feature is not considered a confirmed characteristic for this building.

No analysis available

Across 20 listings, agents never mark wood frame construction or reference it in remarks. Given the concrete high-rise nature of Pacific Monarch, wood-frame construction would be highly atypical, so this feature is excluded.

Only 2 of 20 current MLS listings carry ABOGRO, and the public remarks across the listings do not mention above-ground construction at all. The evidence suggests this is not a recognized or consistently applicable building descriptor for Pacific Monarch, so the feature is best treated as absent.

None of the listings describe or tag the building as brick-built. Given both the absence of MLS selections and the regional norm of concrete/stucco towers rather than brick high-rises, brick construction is ruled out.

There are no MLS or remarks references to single wall construction, which is generally associated with older low-rise homes rather than Waikiki towers. Given the building type and complete absence of SINWAL selections, single-wall construction is excluded with high confidence.

The remarks repeatedly describe the building as resort/hotel zoned and legal for short-term or daily rentals. This is strong, repeated evidence that STRs are allowed.

I searched for references to a hotel rental pool or hotel-managed rental program and found many. Because the building is repeatedly described as participating in a hotel rental pool/program, this feature is true.

I looked for language indicating owners must participate in the hotel pool, but the remarks instead show the opposite. Multiple listings state owners can opt out, self-manage, or be released from the program, so participation is not mandatory.

At least two different listings clearly state that their Pacific Monarch units are 'fee simple,' demonstrating that fee simple ownership exists in this building. While MLS tenure fields currently show no FS entries, these appear to be incomplete or unfilled, and the direct remarks confirm that some units are fee simple.

Remarks confirm that Pacific Monarch has both leasehold and fee simple units: at least one unit is described as leasehold with the fee available for purchase, and others are called fee simple. Thus, the building offers mixed tenure; based on remarks alone we see at least 1 LH and at least 2 FS listings, while MLS tenure checkboxes appear underreported.

I searched for an explicit 4-digit lease end year or renewal wording such as 'expires 2050,' 'extended to 2080,' or 'ground lease ends' and found none. The remarks confirm leasehold status, but they do not provide a specific expiration year.

I searched the remarks for any explicit VA loan approval language and found none. The listings discuss rental programs, amenities, leasehold/fee-simple status, and parking, but do not reference VA financing approval.

I searched the listings for HOA insurance wording such as fully insured, fully covered, comprehensive building insurance, or walls-in coverage. Nothing was found, so there is no public-remarks evidence that the building is fully insured.

Historical MLS data indicates strong checkbox support for fire sprinklers (approximately 14 of 20 listings). Current public remarks explicitly state, "The building is sprinklered for fire protection," corroborating the historical data across multiple agent listings rather than appearing to be a single erroneous entry.

I looked for phrases such as 'FLSE passed,' 'fire life safety evaluation passed,' 'fire safety certified,' and 'passed fire inspection.' The only related safety note found was that the building is sprinklered, which does not confirm an FLSE pass, so this is marked false from the remarks.

Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.

No analysis available

Ocean views are strongly supported across the building. Multiple listings explicitly mention "ocean views," "direct ocean views," "Pacific Ocean," and "panoramic ocean views," with many different units and agents repeating the same theme. The consistency across remarks and the strong current MLS data make this a high-confidence building feature.

Mountain views are clearly present in some units at the building. Several remarks explicitly cite "mountain views," "Ko'olau Mountain Range," and combined ocean/mountain/city views, confirming this is not a one-off or copy-paste anomaly. The feature is not universal, but it is well supported at the building level.

Diamond Head views are confirmed for some units in the building. Multiple remarks mention "Diamond Head side," "beautiful views of Diamond Head," and rooftop views that include Diamond Head, showing clear building-level availability. The evidence is strong even though it applies to only some units rather than the entire building.

City views are universally supported in the current MLS data and are repeatedly confirmed in remarks. Listings reference "city views," "city skyline," "city lights," and "Honolulu Cityscape," often alongside ocean and mountain views. This is one of the strongest building-level features in the dataset.

No public remarks use the specific ‘coastline’/‘shoreline’ terminology even though many listings describe ocean/beach views; therefore there is insufficient evidence that the building should be labeled with a distinct coastline view—agents appear to have used ocean/shore proximity language instead.

Across many detailed listings, there are no references to 'garden view', 'courtyard view', or similar terminology, only to urban and water/mountain vistas. Given the tower-style design and marketing focus, garden views do not appear to be a building feature.

No explicit mentions of a golf course view in public remarks: listings reference Ala Wai Golf Course as nearby but do not say “golf course view,” “fairway view,” or similar. Given lack of explicit view statements across multiple listings, building should not be listed as offering golf-course views.

Limited but explicit evidence: one or a few listings explicitly reference views of the Ala Wai Canal/harbor (e.g., “VIEWS OF … ALA WAI CANAL”), and the building’s proximity to the Ala Wai waterway is noted—supporting that some units offer marina/canal views.

The marketing language never calls out sunrise-specific views despite extensively describing other view types and times of day. This consistent absence indicates that sunrise views are not a notable or promoted feature of the building.

Moderate-to-strong evidence for sunset views: several listings explicitly mention “sunsets” or rooftop sunset viewing (e.g., “panoramic ocean views and sunsets”), and SUNSET appears in MLS view_descriptions for a subset of units, indicating sunset-facing units exist.

No listing references any cemetery or 'cemetery view', and all described surroundings are beaches, city, mountains, and ocean. Given the location and marketing emphasis, it is highly unlikely that cemetery views are present or relevant for this building.

Listings frequently describe panoramic and ocean views, but none state that residents can watch the Friday night fireworks from the lanai, unit, or rooftop. Without explicit fireworks-view language, this feature is assumed not to be a notable attribute.

No analysis available

While no remarks actively advertise pet-friendliness, there are also no statements like “no pets allowed,” and 0/20 listings carry the NOPET restriction despite extensive cross‑agent marketing. This pattern implies the building does not have a blanket no‑pet rule, so buyers looking for pet‑permissive buildings would reasonably consider this property, albeit with some uncertainty about specific rules or limits.

Several listings (many agents' remarks across the dataset, roughly a dozen) reference a 24-hour front desk, front desk service, or hotel/hospitality management and front-desk check-in—indicating continuous on-site management presence. While no remarks frequently use the exact phrase "resident manager" or "live-in manager," the repeated mentions of front desk and hotel management imply on-property managerial staff, so the feature is included with moderate confidence.

Listings repeatedly refer to the building as a “short-term rental condotel,” “hotel condo,” and “one of Waikiki’s premier short-term rental condotels,” and note options like joining the “Pacific Monarch Hotel Rental Pool” or “Springboard Hospitality Rental Program.” The consistent mention of hotel-style management, front desk check-in, and daily rentals across many different agents confirms this is an operating condotel property.

Multiple listings specify “fee simple studio,” “fee simple,” and “leasehold unit, but the fee is available for purchase,” which are not co-op structures and instead match condo ownership. With no references to cooperative or co-op ownership and no COOTAX codes in MLS, this building is clearly not a cooperative (this is establishing, not correcting, the classification).