Pacific Monarch

MLS data is unanimous that Pacific Monarch was built in 1980, and the remarks only reference renovations to units and common areas, not new construction. With no contradictory textual evidence, 1980 is accepted as the building’s construction year with high confidence.

Listings reference units as high as the 31st and 32nd floors and describe rooftop and penthouse amenities above or at these levels, but no remark states an exact story count (e.g., '34-story'). Given no contrary evidence, the building is assumed to have 32 floors matching the highest documented residential floor. Future data with an explicit 'X-story' description could refine this further.

None of the analyzed remarks include any reference to how many units exist in Pacific Monarch as a whole, only individual unit descriptions. Because MLS NumberOfUnitsTotal is 0 (a known placeholder) and no textual evidence provides a building-wide unit count, the actual total units remain unknown based on current data.

Retained the current owner_occupancy value of 4.00 because public remarks do not provide a building-wide owner-occupancy percentage. I searched for explicit percentages or descriptors for the building and only found a unit-level statement that the unit itself was owner-occupied. No evidence found to change the numeric value, so it is kept with low confidence.

Kept current value of 3 elevators because public remarks do not state the number of elevators. I searched all remarks for explicit counts or phrases indicating elevator quantity and found none. Without explicit evidence, the numeric value is retained with low confidence.

Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.

Listings repeatedly highlight individual split A/C or window A/C in specific units but never mention central air as a building utility or as part of the maintenance fee. Combined with the absence of the ACCEN checkbox in all current MLS records, this strongly indicates that central AC is not provided or included in the fees.

Strong building-level evidence: 18 of 20 recent MLS records list CABTV and the remarks explicitly note 'basic cable TV' / 'cable TV' is included in the maintenance fee. Multiple agent remarks repeat the inclusion, indicating consistent building-wide coverage rather than an isolated listing error.

Moderately strong evidence that common area electricity is included. 16 of 20 MLS records mark OTCOEX and multiple public remarks state 'electricity' is included in the maintenance fee, suggesting common area power costs are covered by the HOA.

Remarks discuss fee simple versus leasehold and short-term rental eligibility but never mention cooperative ownership or co-op taxes. With no MLS entries marking co-op taxes as included, this is very clearly not a co-op building, so co-op taxes are not part of the maintenance fee.

Strong evidence: 18 of 20 MLS records mark electricity as included and agent remarks explicitly say 'maintenance fee includes electricity.' The inclusion appears consistently across listings and is supported by direct agent statements.

Across many listings, utilities included in the maintenance fee are listed in detail, and gas is never mentioned, nor is there any sign of gas appliances. With the GAS checkbox absent in all MLS records, it is very likely that the building does not provide or include gas in the HOA fees.

Strong evidence that hot water is included in the maintenance fee: 18 of 20 MLS entries list HOTWAT and the remarks explicitly state 'both hot and cold water' and 'hot water' are included. No listings indicate WTRHTR (unit water heater) which would contradict building-supplied hot water.

Strong, consistent evidence: 18 of 20 MLS records indicate internet/service included and agent remarks repeatedly note 'basic internet' or 'internet' is part of the maintenance fee, pointing to a building-level inclusion rather than isolated listings.

All descriptions focus on proximity to Waikiki Beach, shopping, and rooftop amenities, with no mention of docks or marina facilities. The complete absence of MARINA in MLS fee-includes fields strongly supports that marina access or fees are not part of the maintenance charge.

Clear evidence that sewer service is included: the MLS historically marks SEWER in 18 of 20 records and the public remarks explicitly state 'sewer' is included in the maintenance fee. Multiple listings repeat this inclusion consistently.

Strong building-wide evidence: 18 of 20 MLS entries list WATER and agent remarks explicitly say 'water' and 'both hot and cold water' are included in the maintenance fee. The consistent repetition across many listings supports a high-confidence inclusion.

Very strong evidence: numerous listings mention 'BBQ', 'BBQ area' or 'BBQ grills' (e.g., 'recreation area with BBQ grills', 'BBQ area') across the remarks, matching the prior MLS prevalence (20/20). Evidence appears consistent across multiple agents and listings, not isolated to a single copy/paste.

No listings mention bike storage or similar facilities, and MLS amenities never include a bike-storage checkbox. Given how extensively other amenities are advertised, the absence of any bike-related references suggests the building does not provide dedicated bicycle storage.

All location descriptions reference walking distance to Waikiki Beach, International Market Place, and urban attractions rather than any waterfront dock or marina. Given both the building’s inland setting and the absence of any boat-related amenities, it is certain there is no boat dock.

Although some listings mention a large parking garage and paid parking, none describe any car-wash amenity. This consistent omission, plus MLS data, makes it very likely there is no car wash facility.

Mixed evidence: only a few MLS checkboxes indicate 'club_house', while multiple remarks describe a penthouse/hospitality lounge or community lounge rather than a distinct clubhouse. Because some agents may use different terms interchangeably, inclusion is tentative (phrased as community/party space rather than a separate clubhouse).

Well over 10 listings describe a staffed front desk, including '24-hour front desk', 'front desk check-in services', and 'front desk service', clearly indicating concierge-type operations. This front desk is repeatedly presented as a core amenity for guests and owners. Despite sparse MLS checkbox use, narrative remarks from multiple independent agents confirm that concierge/front desk service is a real, building-level feature.

Given the thorough coverage of amenities in the remarks and the lack of any reference to pet-specific facilities, it is very unlikely that the building has a dog park or dog run. The MLS data is consistent with this absence.

Over 10 separate remarks refer to a front desk or front desk check-in, yet there are zero mentions of a doorman or lobby attendant. MLS data likewise shows no listings with a doorman amenity selected. This strongly indicates that staffing is organized as a front desk/concierge, not as a traditional doorman service.

Across all provided remarks, amenities are described in detail (rooftop pool, hot tub, BBQ, sauna, recreation room), but no listing mentions a gym or fitness center. With 18/20 MLS records not checking an exercise room and zero textual confirmation, it is very likely the building does not offer a shared exercise room.

Despite frequent references to front desk and hotel rental pool management, there is no indication of any limousine or courtesy car service. The absence in both MLS and remarks strongly indicates no limo or house car service is offered.

Remarks often reference a large hospitality suite and penthouse lounge used for gatherings ('indoor Hospitality Suite with dining tables', 'large Hospitality Suite'), implying meeting/conference-type spaces. Multiple listings mention hospitality/party rooms, but explicit 'meeting room' language is less common, so confidence is moderate.

Strong evidence the building offers patios/decks: historical MLS checkboxes indicated 15/20 listings with patio/deck, and current remarks across many listings explicitly mention unit lanais/balconies and a rooftop deck (quotes: "private lanai", "open-air balcony", "143 square foot lanai", "rooftop pool deck"). Mentions appear across multiple agent remarks rather than a single copy/paste note, so confidence is high that the building provides patios/decks for units and shared rooftop deck space.

While agents note nearby attractions like Kapiolani Park and Waikiki Beach, there is no reference to a dedicated jogging or walking path within the building’s grounds. This, along with MLS data, indicates the building does not offer its own jogging path.

The building is presented as a resort-style condotel focused on adult and tourist amenities (pool, hot tub, sauna, BBQ, lounge), with no suggestion of children’s play structures. Combined with 0/20 MLS indications, this supports that there is no playground.

Across all provided remarks, outdoor space is described only as lanais/balconies and the shared rooftop recreation/pool deck; there is no mention of any private yard, fenced yard, or enclosed ground‑level yard area. With 0/20 MLS entries flagging a private yard and no textual evidence, this appears to be a building without yard amenities (not a correction of prior data, just confirmation of absence).

Agents highlight views of Ala Wai Golf Course nearby but do not mention any on-site putting green. The complete absence of such mentions, along with MLS data, makes it highly likely there is no putting green at the building.

Consistent mentions in many listings: 'rooftop recreation deck', 'rooftop recreation area', 'rooftop open space pool' and similar phrasing appear repeatedly. Strong corroboration across multiple listings and agents.

Multiple listings explicitly mention 'recreation room', 'recreation lounge', 'penthouse recreation room' or 'enclosed recreation room with pool table and HD-TV' (appearing repeatedly), supporting inclusion. Evidence is strong and repeated across agents/listings.

No listings describe an on-site restaurant, café or dining facility; remarks consistently mention nearby restaurants instead. Given the absence in all public remarks despite many other amenities described, the 'restaurant' amenity appears incorrectly checked in MLS and is omitted here.

Dozens of listings independently describe extensive rooftop amenities, including one of Waikiki’s highest rooftop pools, hot tub, BBQ, and lounge areas, often with 360-degree views. This overwhelming textual evidence confirms shared rooftop amenities and rooftop access regardless of the MLS checkbox state.

Multiple listings explicitly reference 'sauna' or 'penthouse sauna' (e.g., 'sauna', 'roof top sauna', 'penthouse recreation room and sauna'), providing consistent evidence across listings and agents.

Evidence is limited but present: 1 of 20 current MLS listings has the storage amenity checked and one listing's public remarks explicitly says the unit includes "owner storage." Mentions are isolated (appear in a single listing rather than across multiple agents), but the explicit remark plus the MLS checkbox indicate the building does offer storage lockers/owner storage.

Multiple listings describe a wide range of building amenities (rooftop pool, jacuzzi, sauna, BBQ area, recreation room, community laundry, parking, front desk) but none reference any surfboard-specific storage. I searched for terms like 'surfboard storage', 'board storage', 'surf storage', and 'bike and surfboard storage' and found no matches, so the building is assumed not to offer dedicated surfboard storage based on current public information.

The extensive amenity descriptions focus on rooftop pool/whirlpool, BBQ, sauna, and recreation rooms with no mention of tennis. Combined with 0/20 MLS selections, this strongly indicates there is no tennis court at the building.

At least one listing explicitly mentions 'trash chute' and the building's repeated listings of typical high-rise services (community laundry, front desk, parking) align with trash chute availability. Historical MLS prevalence supports inclusion.

Multiple listings reference parking as paid, secured, or available for a monthly/daily fee but never use the terms “valet” or “valet parking.” Combined with 0/20 MLS valet flags, the evidence strongly supports that parking is self‑park in a garage, not valet (again, this is not correcting a prior true flag, just establishing absence).

Across many detailed descriptions of the building and its amenities, there is no reference to a gated entry, fenced grounds, perimeter wall, or similar physical enclosure. MLS amenity data likewise shows no gated or wall/fence features selected. This strongly suggests the property is an open streetfront high-rise rather than a walled or gated compound.

Strong and repeated mentions: many listings state 'jacuzzi', 'hot tub', or 'whirlpool' (e.g., 'rooftop pool, hot tub, BBQ area', 'sparkling pool, hot tub') across the remarks, matching prior MLS data and renovation notes.

Strong, consistent evidence that the building has a swimming pool: virtually all listings reference a rooftop pool (phrases observed include "rooftop pool", "rooftop pool deck", and "rooftop oasis"). This amenity is mentioned across many different listings/agents and aligns with historical MLS checkbox data (20/20), so confidence is high that the building offers a pool.

No listings explicitly describe the pool as heated; repeated phrases reference a rooftop pool and a hot tub/jacuzzi but none say "heated pool" or "heated swimming pool." Given the consistent absence of any heated-pool language across many listings (and 0/20 listings with pool_features=HEATED), there is high confidence the pool is not heated.

The public remarks repeatedly mention a rooftop pool, swimming pool, and jacuzzi/hot tub, but never describe the pool as salt water, saltwater, saline, or similar. Given the complete absence of such descriptors across many listings, the pool is assumed not to be a salt water pool, though this cannot be confirmed with high certainty from the remarks alone.

No public remarks in the supplied listings mention 'washer/dryer in unit', 'in-unit laundry', or similar. Current MLS checkboxes show WASHER/DRYER in only 2 of 20 listings, but the remarks (0 mentions) and prior high-confidence history indicate this is likely an agent data error rather than actual in-unit laundry.

Strong evidence that the building has shared laundry: all 20 current MLS listings include the COMLAU amenity, and multiple remarks explicitly state 'community laundry', 'community laundry room on the 3rd floor', or 'laundry' among the building amenities. This is consistent across many agent remarks and aligns with historical data.

The remarks confirm the presence of community laundry but provide no details on whether it is free or paid. Since there are no terms like 'coin-op', 'card-operated', or 'paid laundry', the paid status cannot be confirmed and is set to false by default with low confidence.

Multiple listings describe a shared community laundry located on the 3rd floor, implying a centralized facility rather than laundry on every floor. No phrasing such as 'laundry on each floor' or 'laundry room on every floor' appears in the remarks.

Multiple current listing remarks across the building explicitly mention on-site parking for owners/guests (phrases include "parking available for a fee", "paid parking is available", "secured parking garage", and "parking available for a monthly $220 fee"). At least six separate listing remarks reference parking/garage access, and historical MLS data also indicated parking was available—evidence is consistent across different agents and listings, so building-level parking is confirmed.

Listings refer to parking only as paid garage use (e.g. daily or monthly fees) with no wording like 'assigned' or 'deeded stall.' Combined with the absence of ASSIGN in current MLS data, this strongly suggests there is no assigned parking for units.

Multiple listings explicitly reference a 'parking garage' or 'on-site secure parking garage' and several notes call out 'paid parking in the building's garage,' indicating covered/garage parking is available in the building. Evidence appears across several agents and aligns with historical data.

Multiple listings mention paid, secured, or guest parking in a garage and daily/monthly fees, but none say parking is deeded or included in the deed. I searched the remarks for 'deeded parking', 'owned parking', and similar phrases and found no matches.

Across all compiled remarks there are detailed descriptions of amenities and parking, but nothing about EV charging or electric vehicle stations. Given the explicit omission in both text and MLS checkboxes, EV parking is very unlikely to be present.

Several remarks note paid parking; one remark explicitly states a monthly fee of $220. I used that specific monthly figure as the parking fee (other mentions include 'daily fee' or 'reasonable fee' but the $220 monthly amount is explicitly provided).

Remarks describe a shared parking garage that both 'guests and owners' can use for a fee and mention on-site/paid parking options. While not labeled 'guest parking' in MLS, this shows that guest/visitor parking is functionally available in the building garage.

Multiple agent remarks (across listings) explicitly mention 'secured parking' or 'on-site secure parking garage' (and one specifically 'on-site secure parking garage available for a daily fee'), indicating controlled/secured entry to parking is offered in the building. Evidence is consistent with historical MLS flags.

Despite detailed descriptions of the building’s parking garage, there is no reference to tandem-style stalls. The complete absence of such mentions and of TANDEM in MLS strongly suggests tandem parking is not a feature here.

Agents promote many hotel-like services (front desk, rental programs, etc.) but never refer to valet parking or attended parking, instead describing self-park paid garage use. This consistent omission indicates that valet parking is not offered.

None of the public remarks reference a parking waitlist or joining a waiting list. I scanned for common phrases indicating a waitlist and found no evidence.

Across all reviewed listings, there are no mentions of 'keyed elevator', 'fob elevator', or restricted elevator access. At the same time, 0/20 current MLS entries flag a keyed/secure elevator amenity. Given how thoroughly other amenities are promoted, the lack of any reference suggests the elevators are not a keyed or fob-access security feature.

The public remarks reference amenities, front desk services, and resort-style features but never mention card or fob-based access. I searched for terms such as key card access, fob access, card reader, and electronic entry and found no evidence, so this feature is assumed not present based on available information.

MLS data previously flagged SECGUA on several listings (current data: 6/20 listings include SECGUA). Public remarks do not explicitly say 'security guard' but many listings reference a front desk or front desk check-in (including one that says '24-hour front desk'), suggesting on-site staff. No listings explicitly mention 'security guard', '24/7 security', or 'security personnel', so inclusion is based on moderate historical checkbox support plus indirect references rather than clear, repeated explicit statements.

While the remarks highlight 24-hour front desk and hotel-style management, there is no explicit reference to roving or patrol security services. I looked for phrases like security patrol, roving security, and patrolled building but found none, so this feature is set to false given the absence of evidence.

Dozens of remarks describing the building’s amenities never mention cameras, CCTV, or any kind of video security system. MLS data also shows 0/20 listings with a security system amenity checked. This consistent lack of both checkbox and narrative evidence makes it very unlikely that a distinct, building-level video security feature is present.

No listings (0/20) list central/ACCEN/CENAC in unit features and prior analysis had high confidence that central AC was not present. Current public remarks mention split AC and window A/C in several unit descriptions (e.g., "Split AC has also been installed", "window A/C unit", "new Split AC"), but contain no references to building-wide or central air conditioning. Evidence is consistent across multiple agent remarks and appears to describe in-unit systems rather than a central HVAC system.

Multiple current remarks on different listings explicitly reference split/mini-split systems — examples include "Split AC has also been installed," "studio has a new quiet and efficient split-air AC system," and "new Split AC." Historical MLS inclusion data also showed ACSPL checked in roughly 8 of 20 listings. Evidence is consistent across multiple agent remarks and supports that at least some units in the building have split AC.

MLS inclusion ACWIUN is present in 9 of 20 recent listings and prior history showed the checkbox checked frequently. Public remarks across listings explicitly state phrases such as "window A/C unit", "split AC has also been installed", and "new a/c in 2022", with at least several listings mentioning window or unit AC and multiple others noting split AC—evidence from multiple agents and listings supports that some units in the building have window/wall AC.

All 20 MLS listings for Pacific Monarch list construction material as 'CONCRE' (concrete). None of the public remarks mention construction type or indicate a change, and there is no contradictory agent note—so the MLS consistency across many listings supports the building being concrete.

Three of 20 MLS listings flag double-wall construction, but double-wall is never mentioned in public remarks and mentions are sparse across agents. Given the limited but repeated MLS checkbox entries and absence of contradictory remarks, the feature is included with moderate confidence.

Hollow tile is not identified anywhere in the MLS construction fields for this building. In combination with its concrete high-rise description, there is insufficient evidence to consider hollow tile a defining construction type.

Four of 20 MLS listings include 'MASSTU' (masonry and stucco) in construction materials, but none of the public remarks reference masonry or stucco. This is moderate evidence—likely a minority/checkbox usage by some agents—so the feature is included with medium confidence.

There are zero MLS indications of steel frame construction and no textual references to it in any remarks. For this type of Waikiki concrete condotel, MLS would normally flag steel if it were a primary construction type, so it is treated as not applicable.

While the building almost certainly sits on a structural foundation, only one agent flagged SLAB in the MLS and no narrative remarks refer to a slab foundation. Given this sparse and inconsistent data, the specific 'construction_slab' feature is not considered a confirmed characteristic for this building.

No analysis available

Across 20 listings, agents never mark wood frame construction or reference it in remarks. Given the concrete high-rise nature of Pacific Monarch, wood-frame construction would be highly atypical, so this feature is excluded.

The near-total absence of ABOGRO in MLS data indicates that agents generally do not consider this an applicable construction descriptor for Pacific Monarch. The single positive entry is best interpreted as a stray checkbox rather than evidence of a special above-ground construction classification.

None of the listings describe or tag the building as brick-built. Given both the absence of MLS selections and the regional norm of concrete/stucco towers rather than brick high-rises, brick construction is ruled out.

There are no MLS or remarks references to single wall construction, which is generally associated with older low-rise homes rather than Waikiki towers. Given the building type and complete absence of SINWAL selections, single-wall construction is excluded with high confidence.

Public remarks repeatedly and explicitly state that the building/unit are legally permitted for short-term/daily rentals (resort/hotel zoning and legal short-term rental language). This gives high confidence that STRs are allowed.

Remarks explicitly reference participation in a hotel rental/hotel pool program (including Springboard Hospitality and hotel rental pool language). Because STRs are allowed, hotel-pool participation is confirmed with high confidence.

Listings consistently describe the hotel rental program as optional (owners may self-manage, join the hotel pool, or be released from the program). Therefore mandatory participation is false with high confidence.

At least two different listings clearly state that their Pacific Monarch units are 'fee simple,' demonstrating that fee simple ownership exists in this building. While MLS tenure fields currently show no FS entries, these appear to be incomplete or unfilled, and the direct remarks confirm that some units are fee simple.

Remarks confirm that Pacific Monarch has both leasehold and fee simple units: at least one unit is described as leasehold with the fee available for purchase, and others are called fee simple. Thus, the building offers mixed tenure; based on remarks alone we see at least 1 LH and at least 2 FS listings, while MLS tenure checkboxes appear underreported.

Remarks explicitly state the unit is leasehold and reference a fee purchase option, but no 4-digit lease expiry year (e.g., 'lease expires 2050') appears. I searched for phrases like 'lease expires', 'land lease to', and specific years and found none, so the expiry year is unknown.

Public remarks contain no reference to VA approval or VA financing. I searched the remarks for explicit VA language (e.g., 'VA approved', 'VA financing', 'VA loans accepted') and found none, so we cannot claim VA approval.

Public remarks do not state that the HOA carries full 'walls-in' or comprehensive building insurance. I searched for phrases indicating full building insurance or walls-in coverage and found none. With no explicit mention, the feature is set false with medium confidence.

Historical MLS data indicates strong checkbox support for fire sprinklers (approximately 14 of 20 listings). Current public remarks explicitly state, "The building is sprinklered for fire protection," corroborating the historical data across multiple agent listings rather than appearing to be a single erroneous entry.

No public remarks explicitly indicate that the building passed a fire/life safety evaluation. I searched for terms like 'FLSE passed', 'fire life safety evaluation', 'fire safety certified', and 'passed fire inspection' and found no matches. In absence of statements, this is recorded as false with medium confidence.

Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.

No analysis available

Over 20 separate listing remarks explicitly mention ocean or ocean-facing views (phrases include 'ocean views', 'ocean facing', 'Pacific Ocean', 'magnificent direct ocean views', 'preferred ocean-view studio'). Evidence is consistent across many agents and listings and is reinforced by repeated references to rooftop panoramic ocean views and proximity to Waikiki Beach.

Multiple listings (20+) explicitly mention mountain or Ko'olau/Diamond Head views (quotes include 'Ko’olau Mountain Range', 'Diamond Head', 'mountain views'). Mentions are frequent and explicit across different agent remarks, supporting a high-confidence building-level mountain view attribute.

Several independently written listings highlight Diamond Head views—for example 'Diamond Head side facing studio', 'open-air balcony facing Diamond Head', and rooftop 'sweeping 360-degree vistas of Diamond Head'. This indicates that select stacks and common areas offer clear Diamond Head views.

Numerous listings (20+) explicitly reference city or skyline views (phrases include 'city views', 'city skyline', 'Waikiki city lights', '360-degree views of the ... city skyline'). The evidence is broad across agent remarks and consistently reported for rooftop and unit views.

While many listings repeatedly describe ocean, beach and panoramic ocean views, none of the public remarks use the specific 'coastline', 'shoreline', or 'coastal' phrasing. With 0/20 MLS COASTL flags and no explicit 'coastline' language across the remarks, there is strong evidence the building should not be labeled with the specific 'view_coastline' feature.

Across many detailed listings, there are no references to 'garden view', 'courtyard view', or similar terminology, only to urban and water/mountain vistas. Given the tower-style design and marketing focus, garden views do not appear to be a building feature.

Despite multiple references to the Ala Wai Golf Course in terms of location convenience, no listing mentions 'golf course view', 'fairway view', or similar language. Given how extensively other views are promoted, this consistent omission indicates the building is not marketed as offering golf course views.

A high-floor listing advertises 'VIEWS OF ... ALA WAI CANAL, MOUNTAIN, OCEAN', and the building is positioned near the Ala Wai waterway. Since canal views are treated as marina views, this shows that some units in the building offer marina/canal-type views.

The marketing language never calls out sunrise-specific views despite extensively describing other view types and times of day. This consistent absence indicates that sunrise views are not a notable or promoted feature of the building.

Multiple remarks (numerous listings) mention sunsets or evening/golden-hour enjoyment (examples: 'awe inspiring sunsets', 'enjoying... sunset cocktails', 'golden hours'). Sunset references are repeated across listings and in rooftop amenity descriptions, supporting inclusion of sunset views.

No listing references any cemetery or 'cemetery view', and all described surroundings are beaches, city, mountains, and ocean. Given the location and marketing emphasis, it is highly unlikely that cemetery views are present or relevant for this building.

Listings frequently describe panoramic and ocean views, but none state that residents can watch the Friday night fireworks from the lanai, unit, or rooftop. Without explicit fireworks-view language, this feature is assumed not to be a notable attribute.

No analysis available

While no remarks actively advertise pet-friendliness, there are also no statements like “no pets allowed,” and 0/20 listings carry the NOPET restriction despite extensive cross‑agent marketing. This pattern implies the building does not have a blanket no‑pet rule, so buyers looking for pet‑permissive buildings would reasonably consider this property, albeit with some uncertainty about specific rules or limits.

Several listings (many agents' remarks across the dataset, roughly a dozen) reference a 24-hour front desk, front desk service, or hotel/hospitality management and front-desk check-in—indicating continuous on-site management presence. While no remarks frequently use the exact phrase "resident manager" or "live-in manager," the repeated mentions of front desk and hotel management imply on-property managerial staff, so the feature is included with moderate confidence.

Listings repeatedly refer to the building as a “short-term rental condotel,” “hotel condo,” and “one of Waikiki’s premier short-term rental condotels,” and note options like joining the “Pacific Monarch Hotel Rental Pool” or “Springboard Hospitality Rental Program.” The consistent mention of hotel-style management, front desk check-in, and daily rentals across many different agents confirms this is an operating condotel property.

Multiple listings specify “fee simple studio,” “fee simple,” and “leasehold unit, but the fee is available for purchase,” which are not co-op structures and instead match condo ownership. With no references to cooperative or co-op ownership and no COOTAX codes in MLS, this building is clearly not a cooperative (this is establishing, not correcting, the classification).