Pacific Monarch

MLS data is unanimous that Pacific Monarch was built in 1980, and the remarks only reference renovations to units and common areas, not new construction. With no contradictory textual evidence, 1980 is accepted as the building’s construction year with high confidence.

Listings reference units as high as the 31st and 32nd floors and describe rooftop and penthouse amenities above or at these levels, but no remark states an exact story count (e.g., '34-story'). Given no contrary evidence, the building is assumed to have 32 floors matching the highest documented residential floor. Future data with an explicit 'X-story' description could refine this further.

None of the analyzed remarks include any reference to how many units exist in Pacific Monarch as a whole, only individual unit descriptions. Because MLS NumberOfUnitsTotal is 0 (a known placeholder) and no textual evidence provides a building-wide unit count, the actual total units remain unknown based on current data.

Searched for explicit owner-occupancy statements such as '80% owner occupied' or 'majority owner occupied' and found none. Per rules, retained the current value of 4.00 with low confidence and noted lack of evidence in the remarks to confirm or deny.

Searched the remarks for terms like 'elevator', '4 elevators', 'three elevators', or 'lifts' and found no explicit references. Per rules, retained the current value of 3 elevators with low confidence due to lack of confirming evidence in the remarks.

Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.

Listings repeatedly highlight individual split A/C or window A/C in specific units but never mention central air as a building utility or as part of the maintenance fee. Combined with the absence of the ACCEN checkbox in all current MLS records, this strongly indicates that central AC is not provided or included in the fees.

At least two remarks clearly say the maintenance fee includes "cable TV" or "basic cable TV." With 19/20 MLS listings marking CABTV and no evidence this has changed, cable service being included in the fees is very well supported.

While remarks do not explicitly spell out "common area electricity," this is standard for a high-amenity condotel like Pacific Monarch. With 17/20 MLS entries checking OTCOEX and strong historical support, common-area power being included in the maintenance fee is very likely correct.

Remarks discuss fee simple versus leasehold and short-term rental eligibility but never mention cooperative ownership or co-op taxes. With no MLS entries marking co-op taxes as included, this is very clearly not a co-op building, so co-op taxes are not part of the maintenance fee.

At least two listings give a line-item breakdown of the maintenance fee that clearly includes electricity. Combined with 19/20 MLS records marking ELECTR, electricity being included in the maintenance fee is firmly supported across multiple agents.

Across many listings, utilities included in the maintenance fee are listed in detail, and gas is never mentioned, nor is there any sign of gas appliances. With the GAS checkbox absent in all MLS records, it is very likely that the building does not provide or include gas in the HOA fees.

Two separate listings list hot water as included in the maintenance fee, using phrases like "both hot and cold water" and "water, hot water." With 19/20 MLS entries marking HOTWAT and no evidence of unit water heaters, building-supplied hot water is clearly included.

Strong evidence across listings that internet is included in the maintenance fee: 19 of 20 current MLS listings mark INTSER and remarks explicitly state phrases like "basic internet" and "internet, cable TV". Multiple agents consistently mention it, so inclusion is well-supported.

All descriptions focus on proximity to Waikiki Beach, shopping, and rooftop amenities, with no mention of docks or marina facilities. The complete absence of MARINA in MLS fee-includes fields strongly supports that marina access or fees are not part of the maintenance charge.

Convergent evidence that sewer is included: 17 of 20 current MLS listings have SEWER checked and remarks directly state "sewer" is included in the maintenance fee. The consistency across multiple listings supports marking this feature as present.

Clear evidence that water is included in HOA/maintenance: 17 of 20 current MLS listings indicate WATER and remarks contain explicit phrases such as "both hot and cold water" and "water, hot water". The repeated, agent-confirmed statements across listings support inclusion.

Strong, consistent evidence across listings: many remarks state 'BBQ area', 'BBQ grills', or 'barbecue area' on the rooftop recreation/pool deck (MLS shows 20/20 entries checked). Mentions appear in multiple agents' remarks rather than a single copy/paste, indicating a real shared amenity.

No listings mention bike storage or similar facilities, and MLS amenities never include a bike-storage checkbox. Given how extensively other amenities are advertised, the absence of any bike-related references suggests the building does not provide dedicated bicycle storage.

All location descriptions reference walking distance to Waikiki Beach, International Market Place, and urban attractions rather than any waterfront dock or marina. Given both the building’s inland setting and the absence of any boat-related amenities, it is certain there is no boat dock.

Although some listings mention a large parking garage and paid parking, none describe any car-wash amenity. This consistent omission, plus MLS data, makes it very likely there is no car wash facility.

While there is a penthouse recreation room/hospitality suite, it is consistently described as a lounge or recreation room, not a clubhouse or separate community center. Given 19/20 MLS listings do not mark a clubhouse and the language used, it is unlikely the building has a distinct clubhouse facility.

Well over 10 listings describe a staffed front desk, including '24-hour front desk', 'front desk check-in services', and 'front desk service', clearly indicating concierge-type operations. This front desk is repeatedly presented as a core amenity for guests and owners. Despite sparse MLS checkbox use, narrative remarks from multiple independent agents confirm that concierge/front desk service is a real, building-level feature.

Given the thorough coverage of amenities in the remarks and the lack of any reference to pet-specific facilities, it is very unlikely that the building has a dog park or dog run. The MLS data is consistent with this absence.

Over 10 separate remarks refer to a front desk or front desk check-in, yet there are zero mentions of a doorman or lobby attendant. MLS data likewise shows no listings with a doorman amenity selected. This strongly indicates that staffing is organized as a front desk/concierge, not as a traditional doorman service.

Across all provided remarks, amenities are described in detail (rooftop pool, hot tub, BBQ, sauna, recreation room), but no listing mentions a gym or fitness center. With 18/20 MLS records not checking an exercise room and zero textual confirmation, it is very likely the building does not offer a shared exercise room.

Despite frequent references to front desk and hotel rental pool management, there is no indication of any limousine or courtesy car service. The absence in both MLS and remarks strongly indicates no limo or house car service is offered.

Multiple listings explicitly reference an indoor hospitality suite or enclosed recreation/party room ('large Hospitality Suite (kitchen, dining tables, bathrooms, showers, lounge chairs & pool...)', 'indoor Hospitality Suite', 'party room', 'enclosed recreation room'), indicating a shared meeting/hospitality space for residents and guests.

Multiple listings consistently describe a shared rooftop recreation deck with pool, hot tub/jacuzzi, BBQ grills, outdoor dining/sunning space, and panoramic views, indicating a substantial common patio/deck amenity. About 15 of 20 recent listings also have the patio/deck-related amenities checked in MLS, and the detailed, varied phrasing across many agents suggests this is an accurate, longstanding building feature rather than a copy-paste error.

While agents note nearby attractions like Kapiolani Park and Waikiki Beach, there is no reference to a dedicated jogging or walking path within the building’s grounds. This, along with MLS data, indicates the building does not offer its own jogging path.

The building is presented as a resort-style condotel focused on adult and tourist amenities (pool, hot tub, sauna, BBQ, lounge), with no suggestion of children’s play structures. Combined with 0/20 MLS indications, this supports that there is no playground.

Across all provided remarks, outdoor space is described only as lanais/balconies and the shared rooftop recreation/pool deck; there is no mention of any private yard, fenced yard, or enclosed ground‑level yard area. With 0/20 MLS entries flagging a private yard and no textual evidence, this appears to be a building without yard amenities (not a correction of prior data, just confirmation of absence).

Agents highlight views of Ala Wai Golf Course nearby but do not mention any on-site putting green. The complete absence of such mentions, along with MLS data, makes it highly likely there is no putting green at the building.

Very strong evidence: numerous listings describe a rooftop recreation deck or recreation room (phrases like 'rooftop recreation deck', 'recreation room', 'rooftop community lounge') with pool and lounge amenities (MLS shows 19/20 checked). Consistent mentions from multiple agents confirm this is a building-wide shared amenity.

Remarks mention a 'Penthouse level recreation room', 'penthouse recreation room', 'spacious recreation lounge', 'exclusive penthouse lounge', 'community room', and an 'enclosed recreation room with pool table and TV'. These appear in many independent listings, confirming a shared indoor recreation room on the top floor.

No evidence of an on-site restaurant: while many listings mention nearby/world-class dining, none of the public remarks describe an in-building restaurant or café. MLS checkbox activity (9/20) appears to be copy/paste; remarks consistently indicate proximity to restaurants rather than an on-site dining facility.

Dozens of listings independently describe extensive rooftop amenities, including one of Waikiki’s highest rooftop pools, hot tub, BBQ, and lounge areas, often with 360-degree views. This overwhelming textual evidence confirms shared rooftop amenities and rooftop access regardless of the MLS checkbox state.

Strong corroboration across listings: numerous remarks explicitly mention 'sauna' or 'rooftop sauna' in the building's amenity set (MLS shows 18/20 checked). Multiple agents highlight the sauna together with the pool/jacuzzi, indicating a shared building amenity.

None of the 20 listings checked storage-related fields in MLS or describe building storage lockers or extra storage in remarks. The single reference to 'owner storage' appears to be unit-specific rather than a common-area amenity, so it is very likely the building does not offer dedicated storage units.

Multiple listings describe a wide range of building amenities (rooftop pool, jacuzzi, sauna, BBQ area, recreation room, community laundry, parking, front desk) but none reference any surfboard-specific storage. I searched for terms like 'surfboard storage', 'board storage', 'surf storage', and 'bike and surfboard storage' and found no matches, so the building is assumed not to offer dedicated surfboard storage based on current public information.

The extensive amenity descriptions focus on rooftop pool/whirlpool, BBQ, sauna, and recreation rooms with no mention of tennis. Combined with 0/20 MLS selections, this strongly indicates there is no tennis court at the building.

Confirmed in remarks and MLS: one remark explicitly notes 'convenient laundry room and trash chute' and MLS history shows 19/20 entries checked. Combined evidence from agent remarks and historical checkbox consistency supports inclusion of a trash chute.

Multiple listings reference parking as paid, secured, or available for a monthly/daily fee but never use the terms “valet” or “valet parking.” Combined with 0/20 MLS valet flags, the evidence strongly supports that parking is self‑park in a garage, not valet (again, this is not correcting a prior true flag, just establishing absence).

Across many detailed descriptions of the building and its amenities, there is no reference to a gated entry, fenced grounds, perimeter wall, or similar physical enclosure. MLS amenity data likewise shows no gated or wall/fence features selected. This strongly suggests the property is an open streetfront high-rise rather than a walled or gated compound.

Listings repeatedly advertise a 'whirlpool', 'hot tub', 'jacuzzi', or 'pool and jacuzzi' as part of the rooftop amenities. Phrases like 'recently renovated rooftop pool and whirlpool' and 'rooftop pool, jacuzzi, sauna' appear across numerous independent agents, confirming a shared hot tub/whirlpool.

All prioritized MLS listings consistently advertise a building pool—historical data noted 20/20 listings with POOL checked and the remarks repeatedly call out a 'rooftop pool', 'rooftop pool deck', or 'rooftop recreation deck including swimming pool'. Multiple agent remarks independently reference the same shared rooftop pool and pool deck (e.g., 'rooftop pool deck with panoramic ocean and city views', 'rooftop recreation deck including swimming pool'), indicating strong, building-level amenity evidence rather than isolated copy-paste errors.

Multiple listings describe a pool plus separate hot tub/jacuzzi, but none call the pool 'heated' despite extensive amenity descriptions. Combined with MLS data showing no heated-pool checkbox selected on any of the 20 listings, the evidence points to the building having a standard (non-heated) pool rather than a specifically heated swimming pool.

The public remarks repeatedly mention a rooftop pool, swimming pool, and jacuzzi/hot tub, but never describe the pool as salt water, saltwater, saline, or similar. Given the complete absence of such descriptors across many listings, the pool is assumed not to be a salt water pool, though this cannot be confirmed with high certainty from the remarks alone.

Across dozens of remarks, no listing advertises an in-unit washer/dryer despite frequently detailing kitchens, renovations, and other interior upgrades. Several listings explicitly refer to shared/community laundry facilities instead, suggesting units do not have their own laundry. Given only 1/20 MLS checkboxes indicating washer/dryer and no textual support, in-unit laundry is very unlikely to be present.

MLS checkbox data indicates 19/20 listings list community/shared laundry. Several agent remarks explicitly state 'community laundry', 'community laundry room', or 'on-site conveniences include community laundry room on the 3rd floor', indicating the building provides shared laundry facilities; evidence is repeated across multiple agent listings rather than a single outlier.

The remarks confirm the presence of community laundry but provide no details on whether it is free or paid. Since there are no terms like 'coin-op', 'card-operated', or 'paid laundry', the paid status cannot be confirmed and is set to false by default with low confidence.

Multiple listings describe a shared community laundry located on the 3rd floor, implying a centralized facility rather than laundry on every floor. No phrasing such as 'laundry on each floor' or 'laundry room on every floor' appears in the remarks.

At least 7 listings explicitly mention building parking, with phrases like "parking available for a fee", "one of the larger parking garages in Waikiki", "secured parking", and "Paid parking is available...monthly $220 fee." Evidence is consistent across multiple agent remarks (not isolated), matching prior high-confidence historical data that the building offers paid/secured parking.

Listings refer to parking only as paid garage use (e.g. daily or monthly fees) with no wording like 'assigned' or 'deeded stall.' Combined with the absence of ASSIGN in current MLS data, this strongly suggests there is no assigned parking for units.

Remarks note a 'parking garage' and 'one of the larger parking garages in Waikiki,' and paid parking is described as being in the building’s garage. This clearly indicates that covered/garage parking is available at the building level.

Listings consistently describe parking as paid/available for a fee (including daily/monthly options) and in the building garage for guests/owners, implying stalls do not convey as deeded parking.

Across all compiled remarks there are detailed descriptions of amenities and parking, but nothing about EV charging or electric vehicle stations. Given the explicit omission in both text and MLS checkboxes, EV parking is very unlikely to be present.

Several listings mention paid parking; at least one listing specifies a monthly fee of $220, so $220/month is recorded as the parking fee from public remarks.

Remarks describe a shared parking garage that both 'guests and owners' can use for a fee and mention on-site/paid parking options. While not labeled 'guest parking' in MLS, this shows that guest/visitor parking is functionally available in the building garage.

At least one agent highlights 'secured parking' as a building amenity and another mentions an 'on-site secure parking garage,' indicating controlled access to the garage. This, plus several SECENT checkboxes in MLS, supports secured-entry parking at the building.

Despite detailed descriptions of the building’s parking garage, there is no reference to tandem-style stalls. The complete absence of such mentions and of TANDEM in MLS strongly suggests tandem parking is not a feature here.

Agents promote many hotel-like services (front desk, rental programs, etc.) but never refer to valet parking or attended parking, instead describing self-park paid garage use. This consistent omission indicates that valet parking is not offered.

I searched the remarks for terms like 'parking waitlist', 'parking waiting list', or 'join waitlist for parking' and found none. Listings repeatedly mention paid or secured parking availability and fees but do not indicate a waitlist system.

Across all reviewed listings, there are no mentions of 'keyed elevator', 'fob elevator', or restricted elevator access. At the same time, 0/20 current MLS entries flag a keyed/secure elevator amenity. Given how thoroughly other amenities are promoted, the lack of any reference suggests the elevators are not a keyed or fob-access security feature.

The public remarks reference amenities, front desk services, and resort-style features but never mention card or fob-based access. I searched for terms such as key card access, fob access, card reader, and electronic entry and found no evidence, so this feature is assumed not present based on available information.

None of the many unit remarks reference a 'security guard', 'on-site security', or '24-hour security', even though they go into detail about other building services. Instead, multiple listings highlight a front desk, which aligns with concierge service rather than a dedicated guard. Given the mismatch between a few checked MLS boxes and the consistent absence of security-guard language in remarks, this building is very unlikely to offer a true security guard amenity.

While the remarks highlight 24-hour front desk and hotel-style management, there is no explicit reference to roving or patrol security services. I looked for phrases like security patrol, roving security, and patrolled building but found none, so this feature is set to false given the absence of evidence.

Dozens of remarks describing the building’s amenities never mention cameras, CCTV, or any kind of video security system. MLS data also shows 0/20 listings with a security system amenity checked. This consistent lack of both checkbox and narrative evidence makes it very unlikely that a distinct, building-level video security feature is present.

None of the 20 MLS listings mark central AC, and no public remarks describe central or building-wide air conditioning despite extensive detail on other mechanical upgrades. Instead, multiple listings highlight individual split and window AC units, strongly suggesting the building does not have a central AC system.

Multiple current remarks explicitly reference split-air/mini-split systems (e.g., "Split AC has also been installed," "new quiet and efficient split-air AC system," "new Split AC"). At least 4–7 separate listings mention split AC or ACSPL appears in 7/20 MLS inclusions, consistent with prior high-confidence data indicating some units have ductless mini-split A/C.

Multiple recent listings explicitly mention window units, e.g., "featuring ceramic-tile flooring, a window A/C unit" and "fully furnished unit with newly replaced flooring and window AC." Combined with 11 of 20 current MLS entries checking the window AC inclusion and prior high-confidence data, this strongly confirms that Pacific Monarch has units with window air conditioners.

All 20 available MLS listings consistently label Pacific Monarch's construction material as 'CONCRE' (concrete). None of the public remarks mention a change in primary construction material or any rebuild that would alter this, so the concrete construction designation is strongly supported across multiple listings and agents.

Double-wall construction is barely indicated in the MLS data (2/20 listings) and never mentioned in remarks. For a concrete high-rise condotel, double-wall is atypical and the strong majority of unchecked DOUWAL entries support treating it as not applicable.

Hollow tile is not identified anywhere in the MLS construction fields for this building. In combination with its concrete high-rise description, there is insufficient evidence to consider hollow tile a defining construction type.

A minority of agents (3/20 listings) explicitly mark masonry/stucco construction, and this is consistent with typical exterior finishes on Waikiki concrete towers. While some MLS variability suggests occasional checkbox inconsistency, the presence of multiple independent MASSTU entries supports including this feature with moderate confidence.

There are zero MLS indications of steel frame construction and no textual references to it in any remarks. For this type of Waikiki concrete condotel, MLS would normally flag steel if it were a primary construction type, so it is treated as not applicable.

While the building almost certainly sits on a structural foundation, only one agent flagged SLAB in the MLS and no narrative remarks refer to a slab foundation. Given this sparse and inconsistent data, the specific 'construction_slab' feature is not considered a confirmed characteristic for this building.

No analysis available

Across 20 listings, agents never mark wood frame construction or reference it in remarks. Given the concrete high-rise nature of Pacific Monarch, wood-frame construction would be highly atypical, so this feature is excluded.

The near-total absence of ABOGRO in MLS data indicates that agents generally do not consider this an applicable construction descriptor for Pacific Monarch. The single positive entry is best interpreted as a stray checkbox rather than evidence of a special above-ground construction classification.

None of the listings describe or tag the building as brick-built. Given both the absence of MLS selections and the regional norm of concrete/stucco towers rather than brick high-rises, brick construction is ruled out.

There are no MLS or remarks references to single wall construction, which is generally associated with older low-rise homes rather than Waikiki towers. Given the building type and complete absence of SINWAL selections, single-wall construction is excluded with high confidence.

Public remarks repeatedly and clearly state short-term/daily rentals are legally permitted in the building. Multiple listings call out 'legal short-term rental' and 'resort/hotel zoned' status.

Listings consistently indicate the building participates in a hotel/hotel-pool rental program (e.g., Springboard Hospitality), with units being managed in a hotel rental pool.

Listings explicitly describe the hotel/rental-pool as optional and indicate owners can opt to self-manage or release from the program, so participation is not mandatory for all units.

At least two different listings clearly state that their Pacific Monarch units are 'fee simple,' demonstrating that fee simple ownership exists in this building. While MLS tenure fields currently show no FS entries, these appear to be incomplete or unfilled, and the direct remarks confirm that some units are fee simple.

Remarks confirm that Pacific Monarch has both leasehold and fee simple units: at least one unit is described as leasehold with the fee available for purchase, and others are called fee simple. Thus, the building offers mixed tenure; based on remarks alone we see at least 1 LH and at least 2 FS listings, while MLS tenure checkboxes appear underreported.

The listings explicitly note that this is a leasehold unit ('This is a leasehold unit, but the fee is available for purchase.'), so land tenure is leasehold. I searched the remarks for explicit lease expiry years or renewal language (e.g., 'lease expires 2050', 'lease renewed through 2075') but found no 4-digit expiration year to extract.

I searched all public remarks for explicit language indicating VA loan approval (e.g., 'VA approved', 'VA financing', 'VA loans accepted') and found no references. Absence of any mention in the remarks means we cannot confirm VA approval from these listings.

Reviewed the public remarks for explicit insurance phrasing (e.g., 'fully insured', 'walls-in coverage') and found none. Because there is no explicit statement and no current value recorded, returning false with medium confidence per rules.

High historical support (14/20 listings have FIRSPR checked) and at least one listing remark explicitly states "The building is sprinklered for fire protection." Multiple agents have consistently checked the FIRSPR amenity, and a current remark confirms the sprinkler system, indicating strong building-level evidence.

Searched for phrases such as 'fire life safety evaluation passed', 'FLSE passed', 'fire safety certified', and 'passed fire inspection' and found none. With no explicit mention in the remarks and no current recorded value, defaulting to false with medium confidence (absence of mention makes it likely not stated).

Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.

No analysis available

Strong evidence the building offers ocean views: roughly 18 of 20 listing remarks explicitly reference ocean/water views with phrases like 'ocean views', 'ocean facing', and '360-degree views of the ocean'. Mentions are consistent across many listings and agents (not isolated), supporting High confidence that the building has ocean-view units.

Several listings describe mountain views directly, including 'views from mountains to ocean', 'majestic mountains', and '360-degree views of the ocean, mountains, and city skyline'. These repeated references from different units and the rooftop deck show that many units offer mountain views.

Several independently written listings highlight Diamond Head views—for example 'Diamond Head side facing studio', 'open-air balcony facing Diamond Head', and rooftop 'sweeping 360-degree vistas of Diamond Head'. This indicates that select stacks and common areas offer clear Diamond Head views.

Multiple listings (about 15 of 20) explicitly mention city or skyline views with wording such as 'city views', 'city skyline', and 'sweeping ocean and city views'. The consistency across many agents' remarks indicates reliable evidence that the building provides city-view units.

Agents consistently describe 'ocean views' and 'Waikiki Beach' but never mention 'coastline views' despite detailed rooftop and high-floor view descriptions. This pattern indicates that coastline-specific views are not a separately marketed feature of this building.

Across many detailed listings, there are no references to 'garden view', 'courtyard view', or similar terminology, only to urban and water/mountain vistas. Given the tower-style design and marketing focus, garden views do not appear to be a building feature.

Despite multiple references to the Ala Wai Golf Course in terms of location convenience, no listing mentions 'golf course view', 'fairway view', or similar language. Given how extensively other views are promoted, this consistent omission indicates the building is not marketed as offering golf course views.

A high-floor listing advertises 'VIEWS OF ... ALA WAI CANAL, MOUNTAIN, OCEAN', and the building is positioned near the Ala Wai waterway. Since canal views are treated as marina views, this shows that some units in the building offer marina/canal-type views.

The marketing language never calls out sunrise-specific views despite extensively describing other view types and times of day. This consistent absence indicates that sunrise views are not a notable or promoted feature of the building.

Several remarks emphasize evening and sunset experiences, including 'perfect for enjoying... sunset cocktails' and units with views featuring 'awe inspiring sunsets' over Waikiki and the Pacific. These comments occur in different listings and alongside confirmed ocean and city views, indicating true westward or sunset-facing exposure from at least some units. Together with prior high-confidence data, this supports flagging sunset views as a feature of the building.

No listing references any cemetery or 'cemetery view', and all described surroundings are beaches, city, mountains, and ocean. Given the location and marketing emphasis, it is highly unlikely that cemetery views are present or relevant for this building.

Listings frequently describe panoramic and ocean views, but none state that residents can watch the Friday night fireworks from the lanai, unit, or rooftop. Without explicit fireworks-view language, this feature is assumed not to be a notable attribute.

No analysis available

While no remarks actively advertise pet-friendliness, there are also no statements like “no pets allowed,” and 0/20 listings carry the NOPET restriction despite extensive cross‑agent marketing. This pattern implies the building does not have a blanket no‑pet rule, so buyers looking for pet‑permissive buildings would reasonably consider this property, albeit with some uncertainty about specific rules or limits.

Several listings (many agents' remarks across the dataset, roughly a dozen) reference a 24-hour front desk, front desk service, or hotel/hospitality management and front-desk check-in—indicating continuous on-site management presence. While no remarks frequently use the exact phrase "resident manager" or "live-in manager," the repeated mentions of front desk and hotel management imply on-property managerial staff, so the feature is included with moderate confidence.

Listings repeatedly refer to the building as a “short-term rental condotel,” “hotel condo,” and “one of Waikiki’s premier short-term rental condotels,” and note options like joining the “Pacific Monarch Hotel Rental Pool” or “Springboard Hospitality Rental Program.” The consistent mention of hotel-style management, front desk check-in, and daily rentals across many different agents confirms this is an operating condotel property.

Multiple listings specify “fee simple studio,” “fee simple,” and “leasehold unit, but the fee is available for purchase,” which are not co-op structures and instead match condo ownership. With no references to cooperative or co-op ownership and no COOTAX codes in MLS, this building is clearly not a cooperative (this is establishing, not correcting, the classification).