Pacific Grand
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Pacific Grand
Building Overview
Pacific Grand in Ala Moana-Kakaako — concrete building (1968) with a pool and mountain views.
About Pacific Grand
Pacific Grand is located in the Ala Moana-Kakaako neighborhood and was built in 1968. According to available records the building is constructed of concrete. Detailed information on building size (number of units/floors) is not provided in the MLS data available here.
Key on-site features include a pool, a resident manager, and a security guard. Units are served by window air conditioning. The building is noted to offer mountain views.
Additional details from the MLS indicate parking is available. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS. Based on MLS data; buyers should verify all details, including fees, rules, and availability, with the listing agent or management prior to making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for exact percentages and qualitative descriptions such as "80% owner occupied," "majority owner occupied," or "highly owner occupied." The remarks only mention an individual unit being owner-occupied, which is not enough to determine the building's owner-occupancy rate.
The remarks directly confirm that the building has three elevators, which matches the current building context. I also looked for alternate counts such as four elevators or broader wording like "multiple elevators," but the explicit numeric mention is the strongest evidence.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
Multiple agent remarks explicitly list internet/cable TV or cable as included in the maintenance fee and MLS summary shows CABTV checked in 6/20 listings. Phrases in the remarks include 'internet/cable TV', 'internet service', and 'bulk internet', showing consistent evidence across agents rather than a single erroneous copy/paste.
Some listings indicate the fee covers "other common expenses," while the current MLS data shows OTCOEX in 9 of 20 listings. The remarks do not repeatedly spell out common area electricity, so this is best treated as moderately supported rather than definitive. The pattern looks somewhat copy-paste driven, but there is enough building-level evidence to include it.
No analysis available
This feature is consistently supported across the dataset: the current MLS data shows ELECTR in 17 of 20 listings. Multiple remarks explicitly state "electricity included," "MF includes electricity," or "HOA includes electricity," across many listings and agents. Confidence is extremely high that maintenance fees include electricity.
No analysis available
Hot water is repeatedly referenced in the remarks, including phrases like "hot water included," "hot/cold water," and fee coverage listing hot water alongside electricity and sewer. The current MLS data also shows HOTWAT in 15 of 20 listings, with 0 showing WTRHTR. This is strong building-level evidence that hot water is included in maintenance fees.
Internet service is mentioned in many remarks, often as "internet included," "internet/cable TV," or a separate bulk internet charge being part of the fee structure. Current MLS data shows INTSER in 11 of 20 listings, which aligns with the remarks. The evidence is strong enough to include internet as a building-level fee inclusion.
No analysis available
Sewer inclusion is one of the most consistently documented features, with current MLS data showing SEWER in 18 of 20 listings. Remarks repeatedly say 'sewer included' or list it together with water and electricity, making this a high-confidence building feature.
Water is repeatedly confirmed in the remarks, such as 'water included' and 'maintenance fee includes electricity, hot water, water, and sewer.' The current MLS data shows WATER in 18 of 20 listings, so this is a highly reliable building-level inclusion.
No public remarks mention BBQ, barbecue, grill, or grilling area across the listings reviewed (0/20 mentions). The MLS checkbox appears to be a recent one-off (1/20) with no supporting descriptive text, so evidence indicates the building does not offer BBQ facilities.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence that Pacific Grand offers patio/deck-style outdoor amenities. Multiple listings mention a lanai or covered/private lanai, and others reference a sundeck, rec deck, or pool/deck area. This is consistent across many remarks and aligns with the prior high-confidence MLS data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings reference a shared recreation area, most clearly as a 'rec deck' and 'pool/deck located on 3rd floor.' This appears to be a common building amenity rather than a unit-specific feature, so it should be included. Evidence is moderate-to-strong from remarks even though the MLS checkbox is rarely set.
No analysis available
There are many explicit mentions of an on-site restaurant or dining facility across the listings, often alongside other ground-floor retail like a barber shop or convenience store. The language is consistent enough to suggest a real shared building feature, not a copy-paste error. This feature is strongly confirmed by both historical MLS data and current remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for surfboard storage and related phrases such as board storage, surf storage, or bike-and-surfboard storage. The remarks discuss laundry, pool, parking, and lobby businesses, but nothing about surfboard storage facilities.
No analysis available
Trash chute access is repeatedly confirmed across many listings for Pacific Grand. At least 15+ current remarks explicitly mention phrases like 'trash chute on each floor,' 'trash chute plus community laundry on each floor,' and 'trash chute on the same floor,' which strongly aligns with the near-universal MLS amenity checkbox. The consistency across multiple agents suggests this is a real shared building feature, not a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Pool is strongly supported by both historical MLS data and current public remarks. Well over a dozen listings mention it directly, including specific references such as "swimming pool," "pool on the 3rd floor," "pool and deck on 3rd floor," and "sparkling pool," across multiple agents and years. The consistency across remarks suggests this is a real shared building amenity rather than copy-paste error.
No analysis available
I looked for language like salt water pool, saltwater pool, or saline pool. The remarks confirm a pool, sometimes on the 3rd floor or 27th floor, but none describe it as a saltwater pool.
No analysis available
Community laundry is strongly supported throughout the remarks, with many listings explicitly stating 'community laundry on every floor,' 'laundry room on every floor,' or 'washer and dryer on each floor.' This appears to be consistent building-level information rather than a one-off agent note, and it aligns with the high-confidence historical MLS data showing 18/20 listings with COMLAU.
I searched the remarks for signs of paid laundry such as coin laundry, quarters, card-operated machines, or any laundry fee. The listings confirm laundry on every floor, but none say it requires payment, so there is no public evidence for a paid community laundry feature.
The public remarks repeatedly and consistently confirm community laundry on every floor of the building. I looked for floor-by-floor laundry wording and found direct matches across many listings, so this is strongly supported.
Parking is consistently supported across the building. Numerous remarks mention "parking stall can be rented," "parking available for rent," or "parking stalls are available," often with rental price and availability details, indicating this is a building-level amenity even if not included with every unit. The evidence appears broad and repetitive across many agent remarks, not just a single listing.
No analysis available
Confidence 90%: Across 14 current listings, MLS parking_features never show any covered/garage codes (COVERE/CO1/CO2/CO3PLUS/GARAGE), and the remarks uniformly describe parking only as rentable ('parking available for a monthly fee', 'Parking can be rented through the building', 'Parking Stall can be rented from the building management') without ever mentioning 'covered', 'garage', or similar terms. Given how often parking is discussed yet never characterized as covered, and that no listing marks covered parking in MLS, it is highly likely the building does not offer covered parking stalls as a feature.
I looked for phrases like deeded parking, owned stall, or parking included with the unit, but found none. The remarks repeatedly say parking is available for rent through management or the resident manager, which points away from deeded parking.
No analysis available
The remarks do not give one fixed parking price, but they consistently show a monthly rental range. Because the fee varies by stall/location and availability, I returned the observed range rather than a single definitive amount.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is repeated, direct evidence that parking is managed through a waitlist or availability queue. Several listings say parking is rented through management or the resident manager only when spaces open up.
No analysis available
There is strong repeated evidence of card/fob-based access control for the building. The remarks specifically mention keyed elevators and key fob access, which clearly support this feature.
Security guard service is very strongly supported across the listings. At least 10+ remarks explicitly mention it, including phrases such as "24-hour security," "security guard by entrance," "secured building with security," and "security provided building." The evidence is consistent across multiple listings and agents, so this appears to be a real building amenity rather than copy-paste noise.
I searched for explicit references to security patrol, roving security, or patrol service. The building clearly has security presence, but the public remarks do not say there is a security patrol program.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Window AC is clearly supported across the remarks, with many listings explicitly saying 'window AC,' 'window air conditioner,' or 'new window a/c.' I found well over a dozen mentions, including details such as a 'newer window AC unit' and 'Seller offers $500 credit to Buyer to install a Window AC,' which confirms the building supports this feature. The evidence is consistent across multiple listings and appears stronger than simple copy-paste checkbox noise.
Evidence strongly supports concrete construction. Historical MLS data was very consistent (17 of 20 listings marked CONCRE), and current remarks explicitly call the building a "secure concrete high-rise." This appears to be stable building-level information repeated across multiple listings rather than a copy-paste error.
Double-wall construction remains supported by the dataset, though it appears in only 5 of 20 current MLS listings. No public remarks explicitly confirm or deny it, so this is based mainly on prior high-confidence history plus the remaining MLS checkbox presence. The evidence is weaker than concrete, but not strong enough to override.
Three of 20 recent MLS construction_materials entries include 'HOLTIL' (hollow tile), but public remarks across the 20 listings contain no references to 'hollow tile' or 'hollow tile construction.' Historical confidence was Low, and the appearances appear limited to a few MLS checkbox entries (likely agent data entry) rather than corroborating remarks from multiple agents.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings' public remarks (0/~30) reference 'above ground' construction or above-ground materials. The MLS shows ABOGRO in construction_materials for just 1 of 20 recent listings, consistent with an isolated agent checkbox rather than a confirmed building characteristic. Given absent corroborating remarks and minimal MLS prevalence, there is insufficient evidence to mark the building as having a notable 'above ground construction' feature.
Very limited MLS checkbox presence (2/20) and zero mention in any public remarks. With no prior confidence and no supporting remarks, brick construction is unlikely but MLS still shows a small number of listings checking BRICK.
No analysis available
I searched for STR-specific language such as short-term rental allowed, vacation rental, NUC, TVU, or similar terms, and found none. With no evidence of STR permission and no contrary evidence suggesting a hotel-style rental setup, this is treated as not allowed.
I looked for hotel rental pool references, branded rental programs, or hotel-managed operations and found none. Since STR is not evidenced as allowed, this feature must also be false.
I searched for mandatory participation language such as required rental program, cannot opt out, or must participate, and found nothing. With no STR/hotel-pool evidence at all, mandatory pool participation is not supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for leasehold, ground lease, lease expiry, renewal, and expiration language, but found no specific lease-end year. One remark instead says "fee simple," which suggests this feature is not applicable here.
Multiple remarks directly say the building is VA approved, which indicates VA financing is accepted. There is no contradictory language in the provided listings.
The remarks provide clear evidence that the building is fully insured, with an explicit statement of "100% HURRICANCE INSURED." I also checked for other phrases like fully insured, full insurance, walls-in coverage, and comprehensive building insurance, and the coverage language is strongly supported.
No analysis available
I searched the public remarks for explicit fire/life safety language such as FLSE passed, fire safety certified, life safety compliant, and passed fire inspection. Nothing in the listings confirmed this feature, so it remains unverified from remarks.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Several listings (approx. 3–5 remarks) explicitly mention ocean views — phrases include "Peek a boo ocean views", "Ocean views from this nicely appointed studio", and "great city/ ocean view!". The current MLS checkbox data does not show OCEAN, suggesting agents may have omitted the checkbox, but buyer-facing remarks indicate some units do offer ocean views.
Mountain views are repeatedly mentioned across the listing remarks (appearing in ~15+ separate listing remarks) with quotes such as "Enjoy city and mountain views", "sweeping mountain and city views", and "lovely Mountain View." Evidence is consistent across many listings and agents (not limited to a single ad), so despite the MLS view_descriptions lacking MOUNTA codes, there is strong corroborating textual evidence that the building offers mountain views.
No analysis available
Strong, repeated evidence across many listings shows Pacific Grand offers city-view units. About 18 of 20 current MLS entries list CITY in the view field, and multiple remarks from different agents explicitly describe "city views," "city/mountain views," and "open city view." This appears to be consistent building-level inventory rather than a one-off or copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across the listings reviewed, there are no mentions of sunset views, western exposure, or evening sun. Instead, agents consistently describe city, mountain, and occasional ocean views, plus cooler/shaded/east-facing units. This is strong negative evidence across many remarks and appears consistent rather than copy-paste promotion of sunset exposure.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit phrases like fireworks view, watch fireworks from the lanai, or see Friday night fireworks from the unit. The remarks mention city, mountain, and ocean views, but nothing about fireworks visibility from the building.
No analysis available
Evidence is overwhelming that Pacific Grand has a resident manager/on-site management presence. At least a dozen current remarks explicitly mention it, with wording such as "resident manager," "on-site manager," "site manager," and "parking available through resident manager" or "building management." The repeated references across many listings and agents suggest this is a stable building feature, not a copy-paste anomaly.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.