Pacific Grand
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Pacific Grand
Building Overview
Pacific Grand in Ala Moana-Kakaako — concrete building (1968) with a pool and mountain views.
About Pacific Grand
Pacific Grand is located in the Ala Moana-Kakaako neighborhood and was built in 1968. According to available records the building is constructed of concrete. Detailed information on building size (number of units/floors) is not provided in the MLS data available here.
Key on-site features include a pool, a resident manager, and a security guard. Units are served by window air conditioning. The building is noted to offer mountain views.
Additional details from the MLS indicate parking is available. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS. Based on MLS data; buyers should verify all details, including fees, rules, and availability, with the listing agent or management prior to making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
Remarks include occasional references to individual units being owner-occupied but do not provide a building-level owner-occupancy percentage or clear descriptor. Because no numeric or clear qualitative building-wide statement exists, owner_occupancy remains unknown (null) with low confidence.
Multiple public remarks explicitly reference 'Three elevators' and keyed/key fob access. This matches the current building context value of 3, so the numeric elevator count is confirmed from remarks.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
Multiple agent remarks explicitly list internet/cable TV or cable as included in the maintenance fee and MLS summary shows CABTV checked in 6/20 listings. Phrases in the remarks include 'internet/cable TV', 'internet service', and 'bulk internet', showing consistent evidence across agents rather than a single erroneous copy/paste.
Moderate evidence: ~8 listings/reference points in the current dataset mention "other common expenses" or similar phrasing (e.g., "other common expenses"), suggesting the HOA sometimes includes other common area costs. Mentions appear across several agent remarks but are less consistent than major utilities and may reflect copy-paste in some listings.
No analysis available
Strong evidence: electricity is regularly described as included in maintenance (numerous remarks: "Maintenance fees include electricity", "electricity included in the HOA"). This is consistent across multiple listings and agents and is corroborated by MLS checkbox data (16/20).
No analysis available
Strong evidence: many agent remarks explicitly state "hot water included" or similar (e.g., "Maintenance fee includes electricity, hot water, sewer & internet"). The MLS checkbox data (14/20) and absence of unit water heater (WTRHTR) inclusions support building-provided hot water covered by fees.
Moderate-to-strong evidence: roughly 9 listings and several agent remarks note "internet included" or "internet/cable TV included," while a few listings mention a separate bulk internet fee (e.g., "Other fee approx. $26 per month for bulk internet"), indicating the building commonly offers bulk internet but not uniformly across all units/listings.
No analysis available
Strong evidence: sewer is consistently listed as included (many remarks: "sewer included", "sewer and water included"), with MLS checkbox support in the majority of listings (18/20), indicating building-level inclusion in maintenance fees.
Strong evidence: water is widely described as part of the maintenance fee across listings (e.g., "maintenance fee includes water"), corroborated by MLS checkbox data (18/20), demonstrating building-level inclusion of water in HOA fees.
No public remarks mention BBQ, barbecue, grill, or grilling area across the listings reviewed (0/20 mentions). The MLS checkbox appears to be a recent one-off (1/20) with no supporting descriptive text, so evidence indicates the building does not offer BBQ facilities.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence in the agent remarks that the building/units include lanais and outdoor decks: multiple listings state 'private lanai', 'covered lanai', '47 square foot private lanai', 'lanai enclosed', and references to 'pool/deck' or 'rec deck' (e.g., 'Pool/deck located on 3rd floor', 'enjoy the pool on the 3rd floor'). Although only 6/20 current MLS amenities checkboxes list PATDEC/COVPAT, at least 15–20 separate remark blocks mention lanais or decks, indicating the feature exists for some units and common areas.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence across listings: I counted approximately 11 separate remarks that explicitly reference a restaurant or dining facility (quotes include "Newly opened Kapiolani Seafood Restaurant downstairs" and "restaurant on lobby level"). Mentions are consistent across multiple agent remarks and align with prior High confidence, so the building-level restaurant amenity remains supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Listings list various lobby retail and storage/amenity items but do not mention surfboard or board storage facilities. Absence of any reference means there's no evidence of surfboard storage from the remarks.
No analysis available
Very strong corroboration: I counted roughly 18 explicit mentions of a trash/garbage chute (common phrasing: "trash chute on each floor" and "trash chute"). The frequency and specificity across many agent remarks confirm the building has a trash chute system.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence across all listings: 20 of 20 MLS listings include the POOL amenity and the public remarks repeatedly mention the pool (phrases include "pool," "swimming pool," and specific notes like "pool on the 3rd floor"). Multiple agents consistently list the pool as a building amenity, indicating robust confirmation rather than isolated copy/paste errors.
No analysis available
The building pool is mentioned frequently (location varies), but none of the remarks identify the pool as saltwater or saline. There's no explicit evidence supporting a salt pool designation.
No analysis available
Strong and consistent evidence that Pacific Grand offers building/shared laundry: historical MLS checkbox was set for 19/20 listings and current public remarks repeatedly state "community laundry on every floor", "washer/dryer on every floor", or "laundry on each floor" across nearly all listings. This language appears across multiple agent remarks and aligns with the MLS amenity flag, indicating a genuine building-level shared laundry amenity.
The remarks consistently reference laundry presence but provide no information about whether machines require payment or are free. Absence of any payment-related language suggests machines may be standard paid or included, but there is no explicit evidence either way.
Public remarks repeatedly and explicitly state community laundry facilities on every floor (phrases include 'laundry on every floor', 'community laundry on each floor', and 'washer/dryer on every floor'). This is directly supported across many listings, so high confidence is appropriate.
Strong evidence across listings that parking is available for rent: approximately 18 of the 20 unit remarks explicitly state "parking stall(s) can be rented," "parking available via the resident manager," or similar (quotes: "Parking stalls may be rented from building management on availability and wait list," "Parking is available via the resident manager, with a small waitlist. Spot range $100-$150 a month"). This is consistent across multiple agent remarks (likely copy/paste), giving high confidence that the building offers rentable parking stalls even if many MLS checkbox fields show NONE.
No analysis available
Confidence 90%: Across 14 current listings, MLS parking_features never show any covered/garage codes (COVERE/CO1/CO2/CO3PLUS/GARAGE), and the remarks uniformly describe parking only as rentable ('parking available for a monthly fee', 'Parking can be rented through the building', 'Parking Stall can be rented from the building management') without ever mentioning 'covered', 'garage', or similar terms. Given how often parking is discussed yet never characterized as covered, and that no listing marks covered parking in MLS, it is highly likely the building does not offer covered parking stalls as a feature.
All public remarks describe parking as rentable/leased through building management or the resident manager rather than included in the deed. I searched for terms like 'deeded parking' or 'owned stall' and found none.
No analysis available
Public remarks consistently list a monthly parking rental fee rather than free/deeded parking. Reported amounts across listings typically range roughly $90–$150 per month; exact availability and price depend on stall location and availability.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Remarks explicitly describe limited parking availability managed by the resident manager/HOA and reference a wait-list or first-come/first-served rental system. This is consistently noted across listings.
No analysis available
Multiple listings explicitly reference electronic/card/fob access and keyed elevators, indicating a card/fob access security system exists. This direct language supports high confidence.
The MLS checkbox for security is present in 18/20 current listings and was previously present in 17/20, indicating historically high confidence. Public remarks across many listings explicitly state security: examples include "24-hour security", "secured building with security", "security guard by entrance", and "security desk/office" — these phrases appear repeatedly across more than a dozen listings, showing consistent, multi-agent confirmation that the building provides on-site security.
The public remarks describe an on-site security guard, 24-hour security, and a security office, which indicates an active security presence. While 'patrol' phrasing isn't always used, the presence of continuous security personnel supports marking security patrol/presence as true.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
High-confidence evidence: MLS checkbox ACWIUN is checked on all 20 listings and numerous public remarks explicitly state the feature (e.g., 'this unit has... window AC', 'newer window AC unit', 'new window a/c'). Mentions appear across multiple agents/listings rather than isolated, supporting that some units in the building have window air conditioning.
MLS checkbox data strongly indicates concrete construction (18 of 20 current listings list 'CONCRE'), and public remarks explicitly describe the property as a "secure concrete high-rise." Evidence is consistent across multiple listings and agents, supporting high confidence that the building is constructed with concrete.
Moderate-to-strong MLS evidence: 6 of 20 current listings list double-wall (DOUWAL) and prior data recorded high confidence for this building-level feature. No public remarks explicitly describe double-wall construction, but the consistent MLS entries across multiple listings support including it.
Hollow tile appears in only 2 of 20 MLS construction_materials entries and is not mentioned in any public remarks. Given the lack of corroborating remarks or historical support, hollow tile construction is unlikely.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings' public remarks (0/~30) reference 'above ground' construction or above-ground materials. The MLS shows ABOGRO in construction_materials for just 1 of 20 recent listings, consistent with an isolated agent checkbox rather than a confirmed building characteristic. Given absent corroborating remarks and minimal MLS prevalence, there is insufficient evidence to mark the building as having a notable 'above ground construction' feature.
Very limited MLS checkbox presence (2/20) and zero mention in any public remarks. With no prior confidence and no supporting remarks, brick construction is unlikely but MLS still shows a small number of listings checking BRICK.
No analysis available
I searched listings for terms like 'short-term rental', 'vacation rental', 'TVU', 'NUC', and '30-day minimum' and found no statements allowing STR. Because there is no mention either permitting or describing STR rules, STR is marked false with medium confidence per rules.
I searched for phrases like 'hotel rental pool', 'hotel managed', or branded hotel programs and found none. Since STRs are not mentioned as allowed, hotel-pool participation is presumed false.
There is no mention of a rental pool (mandatory or optional) or any language requiring owners to participate. Given the lack of STR evidence, mandatory pool status is set to false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Remarks consistently call the units "fee simple," indicating this is not a leasehold property. I searched for terms like 'lease expires', 'land lease', and specific years and found none, so no lease expiry year applies.
Public remarks explicitly state the building is VA approved in multiple listings, indicating VA financing is accepted. This is direct evidence from the remarks.
Several listings include an explicit statement that the building is fully/hurricane insured (example quote above), indicating walls-in or comprehensive building insurance. Therefore 'insured_fully' is set to true with high confidence.
No analysis available
I searched all public remarks for terms like 'fire life safety evaluation passed', 'FLSE passed', 'fire safety certified', and 'passed fire inspection' and found no references. With no explicit statements, the feature is set to false with medium confidence (absence of evidence).
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Several listings (approx. 3–5 remarks) explicitly mention ocean views — phrases include "Peek a boo ocean views", "Ocean views from this nicely appointed studio", and "great city/ ocean view!". The current MLS checkbox data does not show OCEAN, suggesting agents may have omitted the checkbox, but buyer-facing remarks indicate some units do offer ocean views.
Mountain views are repeatedly mentioned across the listing remarks (appearing in ~15+ separate listing remarks) with quotes such as "Enjoy city and mountain views", "sweeping mountain and city views", and "lovely Mountain View." Evidence is consistent across many listings and agents (not limited to a single ad), so despite the MLS view_descriptions lacking MOUNTA codes, there is strong corroborating textual evidence that the building offers mountain views.
No analysis available
City views are frequently and consistently referenced across the listing remarks (appearing in ~15+ separate listing remarks) with lines like "pleasant city views", "panoramic city mountain view", and "sweeping mountain and city views." Multiple agents use these phrases across many listings, giving strong evidence the building offers city-view units despite the MLS view_descriptions not listing CITY codes.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across a large number of historical and current listings there are no mentions of sunset views or similar terms, and 0/20 current MLS entries have SUNSET in view_descriptions despite detailed view marketing (city, mountain, ocean).
No analysis available
I searched for phrases like 'fireworks view', 'watch fireworks from lanai', or 'see fireworks from unit' and found none. The listings describe city, mountain, and peek-a-boo ocean views but not fireworks views.
No analysis available
Historical MLS data reported RESMAN for 17 of 20 listings. Current public remarks repeatedly reference building management (examples: "resident manager", "on-site manager", "manager's office", "parking available from resident manager"), appearing across multiple agents’ remarks and confirming a resident/on-site manager is present.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.