Ono Vista
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Ono Vista
Building Overview
Ono Vista, North Shore — built 1975; pets and short-term rentals not allowed.
About Ono Vista
Ono Vista is a condo building located in the North Shore neighborhood. According to available records, it was built in 1975. Size and construction type are not specified in the MLS data provided.
Key policies for the building noted in MLS records include that pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not permitted. The management company is listed as unknown in the available MLS information.
Additional details such as parking, maintenance fees, and other amenities are not provided in the MLS data supplied. Based on MLS data analysis; buyers should verify all details with the listing agent or management prior to making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for owner-occupancy language, including explicit percentages and qualitative phrases like "highly owner occupied" or "majority owner occupied," but found none. The remarks only mention individual units being owner-occupied or tenant-occupied, which is not enough to infer the building's overall owner-occupancy rate.
The public remarks do not explicitly give an elevator count like "1 elevator" or "4 elevators," but the wording consistently uses the singular form "the elevator." Based on that repeated language, a single elevator is the best-supported value.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence points to common-area electricity being included in the maintenance fee. One listing explicitly mentions photovoltaic covering common area electricity, and current MLS data shows 13/20 listings with OTCOEX checked. The remark appears building-level rather than unit-specific, so it likely reflects a shared association expense.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Hot water does not appear to be included in the maintenance fee. No listings show HOTWAT in association_fee_includes, and the presence of WTRHTR in many units strongly suggests individual water heaters rather than centrally provided hot water. Remarks about 'on-demand water heater' and 'brand new water heater' support that interpretation.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer is very likely included at the building level. The MLS checkbox is present in the large majority of listings (17/20), and the sewer/septic system is directly referenced in remarks, making this strong, repeated evidence rather than copy-paste noise.
Water is almost certainly included in the maintenance fee. Nearly all listings (18/20) show WATER in association_fee_includes, and the public remarks do not meaningfully dispute that pattern. This is consistent across multiple listings and agents, suggesting a stable building-level inclusion.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listing remarks explicitly reference lanais and covered patios—approximately 15–18 of the concatenated listings mention a lanai, screened-in lanai, covered lanai, or private covered patio (examples: “spacious lanai,” “screened-in lanai,” “private covered patio”). This matches historical high-confidence data and appears across listings from multiple agents, so building-level patio/deck amenities should be included.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sauna is strongly supported as a building amenity. It is mentioned in many current public remarks across multiple listings, and the MLS checkbox history is very consistent (18 of 20 listings). The repeated references appear across different agents and listing styles, so this does not look like a copy-paste error.
MLS checkbox data indicates some availability (2 of 20 listings list storage in building amenities; 3 of 20 list storage in unit_features), and one listing remark explicitly states "this ground floor unit has an enclosed courtyard area with a storage unit." Evidence shows storage/lockers exist for at least some units in the building; while not ubiquitous across all listings, multiple agents have checked storage and one agent explicitly describes a storage unit. Confidence is reasonably high but not unanimous across listings.
I searched the public remarks for surfboard storage or similar shared board-storage amenities and found nothing. The listings discuss surf nearby and beach lifestyle, but not storage for surfboards.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Pool is strongly confirmed. At least 18+ listings explicitly mention it, with phrases like "saltwater pool," "swimming pool," "private pool," and "pool on property," and the amenity appears consistently across agents and remarks. The repeated detail across many listings matches the MLS amenity data and shows this is a true building feature.
No analysis available
This feature is directly confirmed in the remarks across multiple listings. The pool is repeatedly described as saltwater/salt water, so confidence is very high.
Very strong evidence that the building offers in-unit laundry. The current MLS data is unanimous at 20/20 listings showing washer/dryer in inclusions, and numerous remarks across different listings confirm it with phrases like 'in-unit laundry,' 'full-size in-unit washer and dryer,' and 'washer and dryer inside the unit.' This appears consistent across multiple agents rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
No analysis available
I looked for public remarks indicating paid community laundry, including coin laundry, coin-op machines, quarters, cards, or a laundry fee. None of the listings mention shared paid laundry; they refer to in-unit washer/dryer instead.
I searched the public remarks for explicit floor-by-floor laundry language such as 'laundry on each floor' or 'laundry room on every floor' and found nothing. The listings consistently describe in-unit laundry rather than shared community laundry facilities.
Parking is strongly supported across the remarks and MLS data. Multiple listings explicitly mention '1 open assigned parking stall,' 'two assigned parking stalls,' '1 deeded parking,' and 'one parking spot assigned to the unit,' while historical MLS data shows parking features on 20/20 listings. This appears consistent across many agents rather than a one-off mention.
Assigned parking is clearly present at the building level. The remarks repeatedly use direct phrases like 'assigned parking stall,' 'deeded parking,' and 'one assigned parking,' and MLS data supports this with ASSIGN flagged on 15 of 20 listings. The evidence is strong and consistent across multiple listings, not just copy-paste noise.
No analysis available
At least one listing explicitly states that the unit has deeded parking, which indicates parking ownership tied to the unit. That is direct evidence for deeded parking.
No analysis available
I looked for any mention of parking rent, monthly parking fees, or extra parking costs. The remarks only describe assigned/deeded stalls and do not mention a separate parking fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for parking waitlist language such as joining a queue or waiting for a stall, but found nothing. The listings instead describe assigned, deeded, or included parking, so there is no evidence of a waitlist system.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit card, fob, keycard, or card-reader access language and did not find it. While some remarks say the building has secured entry or keyless entry, that is not enough to confirm a card/fob security system.
No analysis available
I looked for any mention of a security patrol or roving security presence and found none. The remarks do mention a resident manager and secured areas, but not patrol service.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Concrete construction appears to be a real building feature rather than a copy-paste error: 14 of 20 current listings list CONCRE as a construction material. While most public remarks focus on unit features and amenities, one remark explicitly references 'CMU walls,' which aligns with concrete/masonry construction. Overall evidence is strong and consistent across the current MLS data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for explicit STR language such as short-term rental allowed, legal vacation rental, NUC/TVU, or minimum-stay rules, but found no such references. Based on the public remarks alone, STR allowance is not supported.
I searched for hotel pool terminology such as hotel rental pool, managed-by-hotel language, or branded programs like Hilton/Ritz/Trump, and found none. Because STR is not evidenced as allowed here, hotel-pool participation is also treated as false.
I looked for language indicating owners must participate in a rental pool, or that they cannot opt out, and found nothing. With no STR approval evidence and no mandatory-program wording, this is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for ground lease, leasehold, lease expiry/expiration, renewal, and lease end language, but found no specific lease year. Without a stated expiration or extension date, this remains unknown from the public remarks.
The listings directly and repeatedly say the building is VA approved, with multiple references to assumable VA loans for eligible buyers. This is strong public-remarks evidence that VA financing is supported.
This is explicitly supported by the public remarks. The phrase "100% insured" is strong evidence that the building/HOA has full insurance coverage, consistent with walls-in or comprehensive building insurance.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for fire/life safety compliance wording such as FLSE passed, fire safety certified, life safety compliant, or passed fire inspection and found nothing explicit. The listing does mention the building is "stable," has "reserve study completed," and has completed capital improvements, but that is not the same as a fire/life safety pass.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Many listings (≈12) explicitly mention ocean or peek-a-boo ocean views with phrases like “ocean view,” “peek-a-boo ocean,” and “Enjoy that OCEAN VIEW.” While MLS view_descriptions currently show only a few OCEAN checkboxes, the repeated, consistent remarks across multiple agents indicate the building offers ocean-view units.
Mountain views are repeatedly confirmed across the remarks, with several listings citing “mountain views,” “Mt. Ka'ala views,” and “expansive views of the surrounding farmlands, coastline and MT. Ka'ala.” This appears to be consistent across multiple agents rather than a one-off copy-paste error, and it aligns with the historically high-confidence MLS pattern.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Historically there was Medium confidence (a few SUNRIS entries and one past remark). In the current corpus 0/20 MLS view_descriptions list SUNRIS and only one public remark says 'enjoy every sunrise, sunset, and rainbow,' while numerous listings explicitly state sunset or west-facing views (e.g., 'ideal for sunset viewings,' 'watching amazing sunsets'). Given the unchecked MLS field and predominance of sunset/west references across multiple agents, the building should be considered not to offer sunrise views.
Sunset views are strongly supported by many listings, with repeated phrases like “ideal for sunset viewings,” “sunset skies,” “watching amazing sunset after amazing sunset,” and “enjoy Beautiful Hawaiian sunsets.” The consistency across numerous remarks suggests this is a genuine building-level feature and not just unchecked MLS boilerplate.
No analysis available
I searched for language like 'fireworks view,' 'watch fireworks from lanai,' or similar references to fireworks visible from the property. The remarks focus on ocean, sunset, beach, and mountain views, but not fireworks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The resident manager feature is strongly supported: 17 of 20 historical MLS listings include RESMAN, and current public remarks repeatedly confirm it with phrases like "resident manager," "on-site resident manager," and "resident on-site manager." The evidence appears consistent across multiple listings and agents, not just a single copy-paste remark.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.