Ono Vista
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Ono Vista
Building Overview
Ono Vista, North Shore — built 1975; pets and short-term rentals not allowed.
About Ono Vista
Ono Vista is a condo building located in the North Shore neighborhood. According to available records, it was built in 1975. Size and construction type are not specified in the MLS data provided.
Key policies for the building noted in MLS records include that pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not permitted. The management company is listed as unknown in the available MLS information.
Additional details such as parking, maintenance fees, and other amenities are not provided in the MLS data supplied. Based on MLS data analysis; buyers should verify all details with the listing agent or management prior to making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for exact percentages and qualitative phrases such as "80% owner occupied," "majority owner occupied," or "highly owner occupied," but the remarks do not provide that information. There are references to tenant-occupied and owner-occupied units, but nothing enough to estimate a percentage reliably.
The remarks do not explicitly state "1 elevator," but repeated singular references to "the elevator" strongly indicate there is one. No listing mentions multiple elevators, so the current value is retained.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence points to common-area electricity being included in the maintenance fee. One listing explicitly mentions photovoltaic covering common area electricity, and current MLS data shows 13/20 listings with OTCOEX checked. The remark appears building-level rather than unit-specific, so it likely reflects a shared association expense.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Hot water does not appear to be included in the maintenance fee. No listings show HOTWAT in association_fee_includes, and the presence of WTRHTR in many units strongly suggests individual water heaters rather than centrally provided hot water. Remarks about 'on-demand water heater' and 'brand new water heater' support that interpretation.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer is very likely included at the building level. The MLS checkbox is present in the large majority of listings (17/20), and the sewer/septic system is directly referenced in remarks, making this strong, repeated evidence rather than copy-paste noise.
Water is almost certainly included in the maintenance fee. Nearly all listings (18/20) show WATER in association_fee_includes, and the public remarks do not meaningfully dispute that pattern. This is consistent across multiple listings and agents, suggesting a stable building-level inclusion.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listing remarks explicitly reference lanais and covered patios—approximately 15–18 of the concatenated listings mention a lanai, screened-in lanai, covered lanai, or private covered patio (examples: “spacious lanai,” “screened-in lanai,” “private covered patio”). This matches historical high-confidence data and appears across listings from multiple agents, so building-level patio/deck amenities should be included.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sauna is strongly supported as a building amenity. It is mentioned in many current public remarks across multiple listings, and the MLS checkbox history is very consistent (18 of 20 listings). The repeated references appear across different agents and listing styles, so this does not look like a copy-paste error.
MLS checkbox data indicates some availability (2 of 20 listings list storage in building amenities; 3 of 20 list storage in unit_features), and one listing remark explicitly states "this ground floor unit has an enclosed courtyard area with a storage unit." Evidence shows storage/lockers exist for at least some units in the building; while not ubiquitous across all listings, multiple agents have checked storage and one agent explicitly describes a storage unit. Confidence is reasonably high but not unanimous across listings.
I searched for surfboard storage, surf storage, board storage, or bike-and-surfboard storage wording. The listings discuss nearby surfing and beach access, but do not mention any dedicated surfboard storage facility.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Pool is strongly confirmed. At least 18+ listings explicitly mention it, with phrases like "saltwater pool," "swimming pool," "private pool," and "pool on property," and the amenity appears consistently across agents and remarks. The repeated detail across many listings matches the MLS amenity data and shows this is a true building feature.
No analysis available
This feature is directly confirmed in the remarks several times. The pool is explicitly described as saltwater/salt water, so confidence is very high.
Very strong evidence that the building offers in-unit laundry. The current MLS data is unanimous at 20/20 listings showing washer/dryer in inclusions, and numerous remarks across different listings confirm it with phrases like 'in-unit laundry,' 'full-size in-unit washer and dryer,' and 'washer and dryer inside the unit.' This appears consistent across multiple agents rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
No analysis available
I searched for coin laundry, coin-op, card-operated machines, laundry fees, or similar payment language. The listings instead reference in-unit washer/dryer, so there is no evidence that community laundry exists or requires payment.
I looked for explicit references such as laundry on each floor, laundry rooms on every floor, or similar community-laundry wording. The remarks only mention in-unit washers and dryers, so there is no evidence of shared laundry facilities on every floor.
Parking is strongly supported across the remarks and MLS data. Multiple listings explicitly mention '1 open assigned parking stall,' 'two assigned parking stalls,' '1 deeded parking,' and 'one parking spot assigned to the unit,' while historical MLS data shows parking features on 20/20 listings. This appears consistent across many agents rather than a one-off mention.
Assigned parking is clearly present at the building level. The remarks repeatedly use direct phrases like 'assigned parking stall,' 'deeded parking,' and 'one assigned parking,' and MLS data supports this with ASSIGN flagged on 15 of 20 listings. The evidence is strong and consistent across multiple listings, not just copy-paste noise.
No analysis available
The listings directly describe parking as deeded, which indicates ownership tied to the unit. This is clear public-remark evidence.
No analysis available
I looked for parking fee, monthly parking charge, parking rental, or additional parking cost language, but found none. The remarks mention assigned and deeded parking, but do not state any separate monthly fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for parking waitlist, parking waiting list, and join-waitlist language, but found nothing. The remarks instead describe assigned and deeded stalls, so there is no evidence of a waitlist system.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit key card, fob, or card-reader language and did not find it. However, repeated references to secured entry and keyless entry provide moderate evidence of an access-controlled security system.
No analysis available
I looked for any explicit patrol-service wording such as security patrol, roving security, or a patrolled building. The remarks mention a resident manager and secured entry, but nothing about patrol service.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Concrete construction appears to be a real building feature rather than a copy-paste error: 14 of 20 current listings list CONCRE as a construction material. While most public remarks focus on unit features and amenities, one remark explicitly references 'CMU walls,' which aligns with concrete/masonry construction. Overall evidence is strong and consistent across the current MLS data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for short-term rental allowed, STR permitted, TVU, NUC, vacation rental, and similar approval language, but found no affirmative evidence. There is also no hotel-style rental language suggesting STR is allowed.
I looked for hotel rental pool, managed-by-hotel, branded rental program, and similar language, but found none. Because there is no evidence that STR is allowed, this must be false.
I searched for language such as mandatory hotel pool, required rental participation, or cannot opt out, but found nothing. Since STR is not evidenced in the public remarks, mandatory pool participation is also false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for leasehold language such as ground lease, lease expires, lease ends, and renewal/extension terms, but found no specific expiry year. Since no lease tenure details are stated, the expiry year remains unknown.
Public remarks directly confirm the building is VA approved. Several listings also reference assumable VA financing for eligible buyers, which reinforces the determination.
The remarks clearly and unambiguously say the building is "100% insured," which supports full insurance coverage by the HOA. This is strong public-remarks evidence, so the feature is marked true with high confidence.
No analysis available
I searched the public remarks for explicit fire/life safety language such as FLSE passed, life safety compliant, or passed fire inspection, and found nothing. Without direct remark evidence, this feature cannot be confirmed.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Many listings (≈12) explicitly mention ocean or peek-a-boo ocean views with phrases like “ocean view,” “peek-a-boo ocean,” and “Enjoy that OCEAN VIEW.” While MLS view_descriptions currently show only a few OCEAN checkboxes, the repeated, consistent remarks across multiple agents indicate the building offers ocean-view units.
Mountain views are repeatedly confirmed across the remarks, with several listings citing “mountain views,” “Mt. Ka'ala views,” and “expansive views of the surrounding farmlands, coastline and MT. Ka'ala.” This appears to be consistent across multiple agents rather than a one-off copy-paste error, and it aligns with the historically high-confidence MLS pattern.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Historically there was Medium confidence (a few SUNRIS entries and one past remark). In the current corpus 0/20 MLS view_descriptions list SUNRIS and only one public remark says 'enjoy every sunrise, sunset, and rainbow,' while numerous listings explicitly state sunset or west-facing views (e.g., 'ideal for sunset viewings,' 'watching amazing sunsets'). Given the unchecked MLS field and predominance of sunset/west references across multiple agents, the building should be considered not to offer sunrise views.
Sunset views are strongly supported by many listings, with repeated phrases like “ideal for sunset viewings,” “sunset skies,” “watching amazing sunset after amazing sunset,” and “enjoy Beautiful Hawaiian sunsets.” The consistency across numerous remarks suggests this is a genuine building-level feature and not just unchecked MLS boilerplate.
No analysis available
I looked for phrases like fireworks view, watch fireworks from the lanai, or see fireworks from the unit. The remarks discuss ocean, sunset, and mountain views, but nothing about viewing fireworks from the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The resident manager feature is strongly supported: 17 of 20 historical MLS listings include RESMAN, and current public remarks repeatedly confirm it with phrases like "resident manager," "on-site resident manager," and "resident on-site manager." The evidence appears consistent across multiple listings and agents, not just a single copy-paste remark.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.