Ono Vista
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Ono Vista
Building Overview
Ono Vista, North Shore — built 1975; pets and short-term rentals not allowed.
About Ono Vista
Ono Vista is a condo building located in the North Shore neighborhood. According to available records, it was built in 1975. Size and construction type are not specified in the MLS data provided.
Key policies for the building noted in MLS records include that pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not permitted. The management company is listed as unknown in the available MLS information.
Additional details such as parking, maintenance fees, and other amenities are not provided in the MLS data supplied. Based on MLS data analysis; buyers should verify all details with the listing agent or management prior to making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I looked for percentage or qualitative owner-occupancy language such as "80% owner occupied," "majority owner occupied," or "highly owner occupied." The remarks only indicate a mix of tenant-occupied and previously owner-occupied units, which is not enough to estimate a building-wide owner-occupancy percentage. No explicit occupancy rate was found.
I looked for an explicit count such as "1 elevator," "4 elevators," or wording like "multiple elevators." The remarks only reference a single elevator in passing and do not state how many elevators the building has. Without a clear count, this remains unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence points to common-area electricity being included in the maintenance fee. One listing explicitly mentions photovoltaic covering common area electricity, and current MLS data shows 13/20 listings with OTCOEX checked. The remark appears building-level rather than unit-specific, so it likely reflects a shared association expense.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Hot water does not appear to be included in the maintenance fee. No listings show HOTWAT in association_fee_includes, and the presence of WTRHTR in many units strongly suggests individual water heaters rather than centrally provided hot water. Remarks about 'on-demand water heater' and 'brand new water heater' support that interpretation.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer is very likely included at the building level. The MLS checkbox is present in the large majority of listings (17/20), and the sewer/septic system is directly referenced in remarks, making this strong, repeated evidence rather than copy-paste noise.
Water is almost certainly included in the maintenance fee. Nearly all listings (18/20) show WATER in association_fee_includes, and the public remarks do not meaningfully dispute that pattern. This is consistent across multiple listings and agents, suggesting a stable building-level inclusion.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listing remarks explicitly reference lanais and covered patios—approximately 15–18 of the concatenated listings mention a lanai, screened-in lanai, covered lanai, or private covered patio (examples: “spacious lanai,” “screened-in lanai,” “private covered patio”). This matches historical high-confidence data and appears across listings from multiple agents, so building-level patio/deck amenities should be included.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sauna is strongly supported as a building amenity. It is mentioned in many current public remarks across multiple listings, and the MLS checkbox history is very consistent (18 of 20 listings). The repeated references appear across different agents and listing styles, so this does not look like a copy-paste error.
MLS checkbox data indicates some availability (2 of 20 listings list storage in building amenities; 3 of 20 list storage in unit_features), and one listing remark explicitly states "this ground floor unit has an enclosed courtyard area with a storage unit." Evidence shows storage/lockers exist for at least some units in the building; while not ubiquitous across all listings, multiple agents have checked storage and one agent explicitly describes a storage unit. Confidence is reasonably high but not unanimous across listings.
I searched for surfboard storage, surf storage, or shared board-storage amenities. The remarks discuss closets, cabinets, and storage units, but do not mention any surfboard storage facility.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Pool is strongly confirmed. At least 18+ listings explicitly mention it, with phrases like "saltwater pool," "swimming pool," "private pool," and "pool on property," and the amenity appears consistently across agents and remarks. The repeated detail across many listings matches the MLS amenity data and shows this is a true building feature.
No analysis available
This is directly and repeatedly confirmed in the remarks. Multiple listings call out a saltwater pool, so this feature is high confidence true.
Very strong evidence that the building offers in-unit laundry. The current MLS data is unanimous at 20/20 listings showing washer/dryer in inclusions, and numerous remarks across different listings confirm it with phrases like 'in-unit laundry,' 'full-size in-unit washer and dryer,' and 'washer and dryer inside the unit.' This appears consistent across multiple agents rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
No analysis available
I looked for language indicating a fee-based laundry setup, including coin laundry, quarters, card-operated machines, or laundry fees. The public remarks mention in-unit laundry in several listings, but nothing about paid community laundry facilities.
I searched for explicit references to community laundry on each floor, such as 'laundry on every floor' or 'laundry room on every floor.' The remarks only mention in-unit washer/dryer and do not describe any shared laundry rooms, so there is no evidence for this feature.
Parking is strongly supported across the remarks and MLS data. Multiple listings explicitly mention '1 open assigned parking stall,' 'two assigned parking stalls,' '1 deeded parking,' and 'one parking spot assigned to the unit,' while historical MLS data shows parking features on 20/20 listings. This appears consistent across many agents rather than a one-off mention.
Assigned parking is clearly present at the building level. The remarks repeatedly use direct phrases like 'assigned parking stall,' 'deeded parking,' and 'one assigned parking,' and MLS data supports this with ASSIGN flagged on 15 of 20 listings. The evidence is strong and consistent across multiple listings, not just copy-paste noise.
No analysis available
The listings directly mention deeded parking, which is clear evidence that parking is owned/assigned with the unit. Additional remarks about assigned stalls are consistent with this.
No analysis available
I looked for parking fee language such as monthly parking charge, additional parking cost, or parking rental, but found none. The remarks mention assigned/deeded parking spaces and street parking, but do not state any fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for parking waitlist, waiting list, and join-the-waitlist phrasing, but found nothing. The listings describe assigned parking stalls and street parking only, with no indication of a waitlist system.
No analysis available
I searched for key card, fob, card reader, keycard entry, or similar electronic building-access language. The remarks mention 'secured entry' and one unit's 'keyless entry,' but that is not explicit enough to confirm a building-wide card/fob security system.
No analysis available
I looked for any references to a patrol service or roving security staff. The remarks mention a resident manager and secured entry, but nothing about security patrols.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Concrete construction appears to be a real building feature rather than a copy-paste error: 14 of 20 current listings list CONCRE as a construction material. While most public remarks focus on unit features and amenities, one remark explicitly references 'CMU walls,' which aligns with concrete/masonry construction. Overall evidence is strong and consistent across the current MLS data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for STR indicators such as legal short-term rental, vacation rental allowed, NUC/TVU, hotel-program language, or minimum-stay rules, but found none. With no public-remarks evidence supporting STR use, this is treated as not allowed.
I searched for hotel pool language such as hotel-managed operations, rental pool participation, or branded programs and found nothing. Since there is no evidence STR is allowed, this feature must also be false.
I looked for wording like mandatory hotel pool, required participation, or owner-cannot-use-unit language, but found none. There is also no evidence of any hotel rental pool program in the remarks, so this is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for ground lease, leasehold, lease expires, renewed through, and similar wording, but found no public-remarks evidence of the land tenure expiry year. The only lease reference is a tenant occupancy lease, which does not indicate the building's land lease expiration.
The public remarks repeatedly reference VA financing and assumable VA loans, which is strong direct evidence. This supports the building being VA loan approved from the standpoint of the listings' remarks.
One listing directly says the building is "100% insured," which is strong evidence that the HOA carries full building insurance / walls-in coverage. This is explicit and highly reliable public-remarks evidence.
No analysis available
I searched for language such as "fire life safety evaluation passed," "FLSE passed," "fire safety certified," "life safety compliant," or similar fire-inspection approval wording. The remarks do not include any of those phrases. There is also no explicit denial, so the status cannot be confirmed from these listings.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Many listings (≈12) explicitly mention ocean or peek-a-boo ocean views with phrases like “ocean view,” “peek-a-boo ocean,” and “Enjoy that OCEAN VIEW.” While MLS view_descriptions currently show only a few OCEAN checkboxes, the repeated, consistent remarks across multiple agents indicate the building offers ocean-view units.
Mountain views are repeatedly confirmed across the remarks, with several listings citing “mountain views,” “Mt. Ka'ala views,” and “expansive views of the surrounding farmlands, coastline and MT. Ka'ala.” This appears to be consistent across multiple agents rather than a one-off copy-paste error, and it aligns with the historically high-confidence MLS pattern.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Historically there was Medium confidence (a few SUNRIS entries and one past remark). In the current corpus 0/20 MLS view_descriptions list SUNRIS and only one public remark says 'enjoy every sunrise, sunset, and rainbow,' while numerous listings explicitly state sunset or west-facing views (e.g., 'ideal for sunset viewings,' 'watching amazing sunsets'). Given the unchecked MLS field and predominance of sunset/west references across multiple agents, the building should be considered not to offer sunrise views.
Sunset views are strongly supported by many listings, with repeated phrases like “ideal for sunset viewings,” “sunset skies,” “watching amazing sunset after amazing sunset,” and “enjoy Beautiful Hawaiian sunsets.” The consistency across numerous remarks suggests this is a genuine building-level feature and not just unchecked MLS boilerplate.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit statements that residents can see fireworks from the building, unit, or lanai. The remarks focus on ocean, sunset, coastline, and wave views, but do not mention fireworks views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The resident manager feature is strongly supported: 17 of 20 historical MLS listings include RESMAN, and current public remarks repeatedly confirm it with phrases like "resident manager," "on-site resident manager," and "resident on-site manager." The evidence appears consistent across multiple listings and agents, not just a single copy-paste remark.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.