Ono Vista
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Ono Vista
Building Overview
Ono Vista, North Shore — built 1975; pets and short-term rentals not allowed.
About Ono Vista
Ono Vista is a condo building located in the North Shore neighborhood. According to available records, it was built in 1975. Size and construction type are not specified in the MLS data provided.
Key policies for the building noted in MLS records include that pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not permitted. The management company is listed as unknown in the available MLS information.
Additional details such as parking, maintenance fees, and other amenities are not provided in the MLS data supplied. Based on MLS data analysis; buyers should verify all details with the listing agent or management prior to making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched remarks for explicit owner-occupancy percentages or descriptors ('owner occupied', 'majority owner occupied', numeric percentages). No listings provided this information, so owner-occupancy percentage is unknown.
I searched the public remarks for explicit counts ('4 elevators', 'four elevators', 'multiple elevators'). Several listings mention the elevator location relative to units, confirming an elevator exists, but no listing gives a number. Without an explicit count in the remarks, the number of elevators is unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings show HOTWAT in association_fee_includes (0/20) and 16/20 list WTRHTR in inclusions. Remarks explicitly note 'on-demand water heater' and 'brand new water heater', implying hot water is supplied by unit heaters, not included in maintenance — consistent across multiple agent remarks rather than a single copy/paste.
No analysis available
No analysis available
A strong majority of listings (18/20) list SEWER in association_fee_includes and remarks reference the building/septic sewer system (quoted: 'securing a loan for the septic sewer system'), indicating sewer service/expenses are covered by the association across the building.
Nearly all listings (19/20) show WATER in association_fee_includes and no substantive remarks contradict this; therefore water is very likely included in the association maintenance fees for the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listing remarks explicitly reference lanais and covered patios—approximately 15–18 of the concatenated listings mention a lanai, screened-in lanai, covered lanai, or private covered patio (examples: “spacious lanai,” “screened-in lanai,” “private covered patio”). This matches historical high-confidence data and appears across listings from multiple agents, so building-level patio/deck amenities should be included.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
MLS checkbox historically lists sauna in 18 of 20 listings and the public remarks repeatedly reference a building sauna across many listings. Representative quotes include "saltwater pool and sauna", "private pool & sauna reserved for residents", and "10-person sauna"; the consistency across different remarks and agents indicates strong, building-level amenity evidence.
MLS checkbox data indicates some availability (2 of 20 listings list storage in building amenities; 3 of 20 list storage in unit_features), and one listing remark explicitly states "this ground floor unit has an enclosed courtyard area with a storage unit." Evidence shows storage/lockers exist for at least some units in the building; while not ubiquitous across all listings, multiple agents have checked storage and one agent explicitly describes a storage unit. Confidence is reasonably high but not unanimous across listings.
I searched the remarks for 'surfboard storage', 'board storage', 'surf storage', or references to dedicated board/bike storage and found none. Listings focus on nearby surf breaks and beach access but do not describe on-site surfboard storage.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 20 current MLS listings include the pool amenity and many public remarks explicitly state 'saltwater pool' or 'swimming pool' (examples: 'saltwater pool', 'private salt water swimming pool', 'refinished saltwater pool'). The consistency across numerous listings/agents provides strong evidence the building offers a shared swimming pool amenity.
No analysis available
The public remarks repeatedly and explicitly identify the community pool as a saltwater pool (e.g., 'saltwater pool', 'private saltwater pool', 'refinished saltwater pool'), providing high confidence that the pool is saltwater.
High-confidence evidence that some units offer in-unit laundry: 20/20 current MLS listings list washer/dryer in inclusions and numerous agent remarks explicitly state "in-unit washer and dryer," "full-size in-unit washer and dryer," or "washer and dryer are brand new." Mentions appear across multiple listings and agents, reinforcing the building-level availability rather than a single listing anomaly.
No analysis available
I looked for terms such as 'coin laundry', 'coin-op', 'quarters', 'paid laundry', or 'card-operated laundry' and found no references. Remarks emphasize in-unit washers/dryers rather than paid community machines.
I searched the public remarks for phrases like 'laundry on each floor', 'laundry room on every floor', or 'floor-by-floor laundry' and found none. Listings repeatedly reference in-unit washer/dryer but do not indicate community laundry on every floor.
Strong evidence the building has parking: MLS checkbox data indicates parking on 20/20 listings and many remarks mention parking (e.g., "two assigned parking stalls", "ample street parking"). The consistency across multiple listings/agents suggests this is a building-level feature rather than isolated errors.
Multiple listings note assigned/deeded parking: MLS shows ASSIGN on 15/20 listings and the remarks include direct phrases such as "two assigned parking stalls", "one assigned parking", and "1 deeded parking" across several agent entries, providing strong evidence that assigned parking is offered in the building.
No analysis available
Multiple listings state assigned parking stalls and at least one listing explicitly uses '1 deeded parking', which indicates parking is deeded/assigned with the unit.
No analysis available
I reviewed the remarks for language indicating a recurring parking fee (e.g., 'parking fee', 'monthly parking'); there were no references, so the monthly parking fee is not specified in the public remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for terms like 'waitlist', 'waiting list', and 'join waitlist' related to parking and found no references. Absence of mention suggests no formal parking waitlist noted in the public remarks.
No analysis available
I searched for 'key card', 'fob', 'card reader', and 'electronic access' and found no explicit references. Because 'keyless entry' appears once but does not explicitly indicate key card/fob system, I did not mark security_card as present.
No analysis available
Remarks mention an on-site resident manager but contain no references to a security patrol or roving security service. I searched for 'security patrol', 'patrolled', and similar phrases with no matches.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
14 of 20 current MLS listings list 'CONCRE' as a construction material and historical data indicated medium confidence (~13/20). Public remarks include an explicit reference to 'CMU walls smoothed,' which aligns with concrete/CMU construction. Evidence is consistent across multiple agent listings and reinforced by a direct remark, supporting inclusion of concrete construction for the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I examined the remarks for explicit STR language (e.g., 'short-term rental allowed', 'vacation rental allowed', '30-day minimum') and found none. With no evidence in the public remarks, STR allowance is not indicated.
Because the public remarks contain no reference to short-term rental permission and no statements about hotel rental pool participation, hotel-pool participation is considered not applicable/false.
No public remarks reference any rental-pool program or mandatory participation. Given STR is not indicated and there is no rental-pool language, mandatory pool participation is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the public remarks for terms like 'lease expires', 'land lease to', 'leasehold', and specific years; none were found. No evidence to determine a lease expiry year.
Several listings explicitly reference VA assumable loans and state the building is VA/VA financing approved. This is strong, direct evidence in the public remarks that VA financing is accepted.
One public remark explicitly states the building is '100% insured', indicating HOA provides full (walls-in) insurance coverage. This explicit language supports a high-confidence true value.
No analysis available
I searched all public remarks for FLSE/fire-life-safety language (e.g., 'FLSE passed', 'fire life safety evaluation passed', 'fire safety certified'). There are no mentions indicating the building passed a fire/life safety evaluation, so the field is set false with medium confidence due to absence of evidence in remarks.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Many listings (≈12) explicitly mention ocean or peek-a-boo ocean views with phrases like “ocean view,” “peek-a-boo ocean,” and “Enjoy that OCEAN VIEW.” While MLS view_descriptions currently show only a few OCEAN checkboxes, the repeated, consistent remarks across multiple agents indicate the building offers ocean-view units.
Several listings (≈5) reference mountain or Mt. Ka'ala views with direct phrases like “Mt. Ka'ala views” and “mountain views.” This consistent, repeated language across listings supports marking the building as offering mountain views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Historically there was Medium confidence (a few SUNRIS entries and one past remark). In the current corpus 0/20 MLS view_descriptions list SUNRIS and only one public remark says 'enjoy every sunrise, sunset, and rainbow,' while numerous listings explicitly state sunset or west-facing views (e.g., 'ideal for sunset viewings,' 'watching amazing sunsets'). Given the unchecked MLS field and predominance of sunset/west references across multiple agents, the building should be considered not to offer sunrise views.
Numerous listings (≈8) explicitly mention sunsets and west-facing/exposure with phrases like “sunset skies,” “ideal for sunset viewings,” and “watch amazing sunsets.” The repeated cross-listing confirmations indicate the building offers sunset-view units.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for 'fireworks view', 'watch fireworks from lanai' or similar phrases and found none. Listings describe sunsets, ocean views, whales and waves, but no fireworks-view claims.
No analysis available
High-confidence evidence that the building has a resident/on-site manager: 17 of 20 MLS listings historically list RESMAN and numerous current remarks explicitly state 'resident manager', 'on-site resident manager', and 'on-site manager' (examples: 'Resident manager is always working to ensure residents...' and 'resident on-site manager'). Mentions appear across multiple agent remarks rather than a single listing, indicating consistent reporting rather than isolated copy/paste.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.