
One Waterfront Tower
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
One Waterfront Tower
Building Overview
One Waterfront Tower in Ala Moana-Kakaako — 45-story concrete high-rise (1989) with ocean and mountain views and on-site pool.

About One Waterfront Tower
One Waterfront Tower is a 45-floor concrete high-rise located in the Ala Moana-Kakaako neighborhood, built in 1989. The building offers ocean, mountain and sunset views from its units and common areas.
Based on MLS data, on-site amenities include a pool, fitness center, BBQ area, a resident manager and a security guard. Units are served by central air conditioning.
According to available records, parking is available, covered, assigned, with guest parking. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS data. Buyers should verify all details, fees and policies with the listing agent or building management before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for owner-occupancy figures or descriptors like "80% owner occupied," "majority owner occupied," or "highly owner occupied." The remarks only include a floor-specific note that "all owner occupied on this floor" and a comment that many owners have other homes, which is not a building-wide occupancy rate. Since no explicit percentage is given, the owner occupancy level remains unknown.
I looked for explicit phrases like "4 elevators," "four elevators," or "multiple elevators," but the remarks only reference using the elevators, being near the elevator, or private elevator entrances for penthouses. Those comments do not state how many elevators the building has. With no explicit count in the remarks, the elevator number remains unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
Central air conditioning is repeatedly described as included/provided for the units. The MLS shows 12 of 20 listings with ACCEN, and the remarks explicitly mention “Central AC,” “cool central air,” and “bldg supplies chilled water.” Evidence suggests a real building service rather than a copy-paste error.
Cable TV appears to be included in the building’s maintenance fees. The MLS history is very consistent at 17/20 listings with CABTV, and current remarks explicitly say "maintenance fee includes internet and cable tv" and "basic cable."
Common-area electricity is very likely included in the building’s fees. The MLS data is highly consistent at 18/20 listings with OTCOEX, and while remarks more often mention the broad maintenance package than the exact utility label, they align with shared building costs being covered.
No analysis available
Electricity appears to be included for at least some listings, but the evidence is inconsistent. A few remarks explicitly say “Electricity is included in maint. fee,” “the monthly fee includes all utilities,” and “Electricity billed at special rate with maintenance fee,” while others say it is metered/billed separately. Because the MLS only shows ELECTR in 3 of 20 listings, this looks partially true but not uniformly applied or described.
Across dozens of listings, there are no explicit statements that gas service is included in owners’ maintenance fees. Gas is only mentioned in the context of amenities (fire pits, BBQ grills), and 16/20 MLS records do not mark GAS. This supports treating gas as not included in the association fees for units.
Hot water appears to be included in the maintenance fee. A strong remark directly says the fee includes "hot water," and the MLS history supports this with 13/20 listings marking HOTWAT and none showing WTRHTR.
Internet service is clearly included in the building fees. The MLS is strong at 17/20 listings with INTSER, and current remarks directly confirm it with phrases like "maintenance fee includes internet and cable tv."
No analysis available
Sewer is consistently included in the maintenance fee. The MLS shows 18/20 listings with SEWER, and remarks directly confirm this with explicit language that the fee includes sewer.
Water is clearly part of the included utilities for this building. The MLS has 18/20 listings with WATER, and current remarks directly confirm that the maintenance fee includes water.
BBQ amenities are universally supported. Current remarks repeatedly cite "BBQ areas," "BBQ cabanas," "BBQ pavilion," "barbecue area," and "BBQ grills" across nearly every listing. This is strong, building-level evidence and clearly not a mistaken checkbox.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Car wash facilities are well supported. Several listings mention "car wash area" directly, and the MLS shows 14/20 current listings with the amenity. This is strong enough to treat as a genuine building feature.
Clubhouse availability is well supported. Several listings explicitly say "clubhouse," and MLS data shows it in about half of the current records. This looks like a real building amenity rather than agent copy.
Concierge service is supported by explicit remarks in multiple listings, including phrases like "staffed concierge" and "concierge desk." Even though only 1/20 current MLS listings has CONCIE checked, the wording is direct and building-level, so this appears to be a real amenity rather than a copy-paste error.
This appears to be absent or at least not supported by the provided remarks. The only MLS signal is 1/20, and none of the current descriptions mention a dog park, dog run, or pet area. Based on the high likelihood of MLS checkbox noise, this is corrected to false.
Evidence for a doorman is weak: only 1 of 20 MLS listings includes DOORMA and there is a single remark referencing a "concierge desk," but virtually none of the many other public remarks use "doorman", "door attendant", or "lobby attendant." Historical data lacked confidence and current remarks do not support a consistent doorman/lobby-attendant service across the building, so the feature is omitted.
This feature is strongly supported. Dozens of current remarks reference "fitness center," "exercise room," "gym," "indoor and outdoor fitness areas," and "weight room," matching the MLS pattern of 16/20 listings. The evidence is consistent across multiple agents and does not look like a one-off copy-paste error.
No analysis available
Meeting/conference space appears to be a real shared amenity. Remarks reference "conference room" and "conference rooms" in multiple listings, and the MLS has 8/20 matching entries. The evidence is sufficiently strong to include.
Strong, repeated evidence confirms patio/deck access for this building. In the current remarks, dozens of listings mention a 'covered lanai,' 'spacious lanai,' 'large lanai,' or 'private lanai,' and several also reference the building’s 'recreation deck' or 'amenity deck.' The consistency across many listings and multiple agents supports that this feature is real and commonly available in the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The building clearly offers a shared recreation/amenity deck. About 16 of 20 listings mention a recreation area, with repeated references to a 'recreation deck,' 'amenity deck,' and 'expansive rec deck.' The language is consistent across listings and aligns with the MLS amenity data.
There is moderate-to-strong evidence for a recreation room or equivalent shared activity space. A few remarks reference a "game room area" and amenity/recreation decks, while the MLS has 5/20 RECROO checks. This is enough to include, though it is less consistently described than the core amenities.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sauna is a supported building amenity. Multiple listings mention "sauna" directly, often alongside the pool, spa, and fitness areas, and the MLS shows 10/20 current entries. This is consistent enough to include with high confidence.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for surfboard storage references and related wording like board storage or surf storage. No such amenity is mentioned, so there is no public evidence for surfboard storage.
Tennis is a confirmed building amenity. Remarks repeatedly mention "tennis courts," "2 tennis courts," and "tennis/pickleball courts," with the MLS showing 19/20 listings checked. The consistency across agents makes this very high confidence.
Trash chute is supported primarily by the MLS amenity data rather than the public remarks. Sixteen of 20 current listings check the trash chute box, which is strong building-level evidence even though agents seldom spell it out in narrative remarks. There is no sign of a correction or credible contrary evidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Whirlpool/spa amenities are clearly present. Listings frequently use terms like "whirlpool spa," "jacuzzi," "hot tub," and "spa," and the MLS supports this in 14/20 records. The evidence is strong and consistent.
Pool is strongly confirmed at the building level. Dozens of current remarks mention it directly, with phrases like 'sparkling pool,' 'heated pool,' 'swimming pool,' and 'heated saltwater pool,' often alongside other shared amenities. The evidence is consistent across many listings and appears to reflect an actual common amenity rather than copy-paste error.
Multiple listings explicitly state the pool is heated — common quotations include “heated pool,” “heated swimming pool,” “heated saltwater pool,” and “newly renovated heated pool.” This explicit, repeated language from numerous agents provides strong, building-level confirmation that the pool is heated.
There is direct public-remarks evidence that the pool is salt water. The phrasing is explicit and unambiguous, so this feature is confirmed with very high confidence.
In-unit laundry is strongly supported across the listing history and current public remarks. Multiple listings explicitly say 'washer/dryer in unit' or 'washer and dryer in the unit,' and one notes 'newer washer/dryer stacked,' which is direct evidence rather than agent checkbox noise. This appears consistent across many listings and agents, so the feature should be included with very high confidence.
No analysis available
I looked for public mentions of paid community laundry, including coin-operated, card-operated, or fee-based laundry. The remarks do not reference any community laundry system or payment method, so this feature is not supported by the listings.
I searched the public remarks for phrases like "laundry on every floor," "laundry room on each floor," and similar floor-specific laundry references. None were found, so there is no public evidence supporting this feature.
No analysis available
Assigned parking is very strongly supported for One Waterfront Towers. Multiple remarks explicitly say things like “two assigned parking stalls,” “2 titled parking,” “one assigned covered parking stall,” and “included one with your very own EV charger,” showing this is not a one-off copy-paste issue.
Covered parking is heavily documented across the remarks. Examples include “covered parking stall,” “2-covered parking,” “2 covered parking stalls,” “covered and secured parking,” and “gated parking garage,” making this a very strong building-level feature.
I looked for explicit statements like deeded parking, owned stall, or parking included in deed, but the remarks only describe assigned, covered, secured, or titled stalls. That suggests parking is included/assigned, but not clearly deeded from the public remarks.
No analysis available
I searched for monthly parking fee language, parking rental amounts, or additional stall charges and found no mention of any parking cost. The remarks discuss parking availability and stall counts, but not a separate parking fee.
Guest parking is clearly available at the building. Many remarks say “guest parking,” “plenty of guest parking,” “many guest parking available,” and “ample guest parking,” across multiple listings and agents.
Secured parking/access is well supported for this building. Remarks mention “24/7 security,” “secured parking,” “secured and covered parking,” “gated parking garage,” and “secured parking with cameras,” indicating a consistently secure parking setup.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for parking waitlist or waiting list language and found none. The remarks consistently describe included parking, guest parking, and assigned stalls, which points away from a waitlist system.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit card/fob access terms such as key card entry, fob access, card reader, or electronic access. The listings only describe the building as secure with 24/7 security and secured parking, which is not enough to confirm card-based access.
There is overwhelming evidence that the building has security guard service. Across the provided remarks, dozens of listings reference "24/7 security," "24-hour security," "security guards," or "on-site security," and several also mention related peace-of-mind features like concierge, secured parking, and a security office. The evidence is consistent across multiple agents and appears to be a real building-level amenity rather than a copy-paste error.
I looked for public remarks indicating a patrol service or roving security presence. The listings mention 24/7 security and security guards, but nothing about patrols, so this feature is not confirmed.
No analysis available
Central AC is strongly supported as a building feature. In the current remarks, many listings explicitly mention it—e.g., "cool central air," "Central AC (bldg supplies chilled water)," and "central air conditioning"—across multiple units and towers, indicating this is not a one-off copy-paste error. The evidence is consistent with the prior high-confidence MLS data and clearly supports including central_ac for the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence is overwhelming that this building is concrete. The MLS materials field shows CONCRE in 18 of 20 current listings, and multiple public remarks independently describe the building/unit work with concrete language, including "concrete construction" and "built from the concrete up." This appears to be consistent building-level data rather than agent copy-paste noise.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Steel-frame construction is unlikely: only 2 of 20 current listings have STEFRA checked and there are no public remarks mentioning "steel frame" or similar. Given the strong, consistent evidence for concrete construction across most listings and the lack of any descriptive remarks supporting steel framing, the STEFRA entries appear to be erroneous copy‑paste rather than a legitimate building feature.
Confidence 90%: Only 2/20 MLS records list SLAB while 19/20 list CONCRE, and a 45-story tower in Honolulu is not a slab-on-grade style building; the few SLAB entries are likely agent miscoding.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Several listings describe One Waterfront Towers as “twin 45-story towers on 2.45 acres” and a “twin luxury condo towers completed in 1989,” with one unit noting “concrete construction for quiet and privacy,” all of which inherently indicate conventional above-ground high-rise construction. Although only 4 of 20 MLS entries explicitly check ABOGRO in construction_materials, no remarks mention any alternative or partially subterranean building form, so the building can be treated as above-ground construction with moderate confidence. The sparse ABOGRO checkbox usage likely reflects inconsistent agent data entry rather than differing construction types within the project.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for short-term rental indicators such as STR allowed, NUC, TVU, vacation rental language, or minimum-stay exceptions, but found none. There is also no mention of legal short-term rental allowance, so this is not supported by the remarks.
I searched for hotel pool indicators such as hotel rental pool, hotel-managed units, branded rental programs, or names like Hilton/Trump/Ritz pool references, and found none. Because there is no STR evidence either, this must be false.
I looked for language showing required participation in a rental pool, such as mandatory pool, cannot opt out, or must rent, and found nothing. With no evidence of any hotel rental pool and no STR support, mandatory participation is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the public remarks for leasehold language such as lease expires, ground lease ends, renewal through, or lease expiry year, but found nothing. Based on the remarks provided, there is no evidence to identify a lease expiration year.
The public remarks repeatedly and directly confirm VA financing availability. This is strong, explicit evidence from several listings, so the feature is set to true with very high confidence.
The public remarks explicitly say the building is fully insured, which matches the definition of walls-in/comprehensive building insurance. This is strong direct evidence and does not require inference.
Fire sprinkler coverage is strongly supported. At least 2 current remarks explicitly mention 'Building and unit equipped with fire sprinklers' or 'sprinklered,' and the historical MLS data already showed 13/20 listings with FIRSPR. The evidence appears consistent across multiple agents rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
I searched for phrases such as fire/life safety evaluation passed, FLSE passed, fire safety certified, life safety compliant, or passed fire inspection. The remarks mention sprinklers and a sprinklered unit, but that is not the same as a passed FLSE. Because there is no explicit pass/compliance statement in the remarks, this is treated as not evidenced in the public remarks.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Ocean views are strongly supported across the building. At least 18 of 20 listings mention ocean in the view descriptions, with repeated remark language such as 'breathtaking ocean views,' 'Pacific Ocean,' and 'ocean facing.' The evidence appears consistent across multiple agents rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
Multiple listings explicitly cite mountain or mauka views (phrases include "mountain views", "Ko'olau mountains", and "mauka to makai"). The recurrence across many unit remarks from different listings supports high confidence that the building offers mountain-view units.
No analysis available
City views are well established for this building. Seventeen of 20 listings reference city in the view descriptions, and remarks repeatedly describe 'downtown skyline,' 'city lights,' and 'city and mountain views.' This is strong cross-listing confirmation, not isolated wording.
Coastline views are clearly offered in at least some units. Eleven of 20 listings mention coastline in the view descriptions, and several remarks directly say 'coastline views' or describe coastal/ocean panoramas. The evidence is strong enough to include the feature for buyers searching this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sunrise views are present in a minority of listings but are explicitly documented. Five of 20 listings mention sunrise-related views, including phrases like 'east sunrise mountain' and 'enjoy beautiful sunrises.' This supports the feature with moderate-to-high confidence.
Sunset views are one of the most consistently advertised features in the building. Seventeen of 20 listings include sunset in the view descriptions, and the remarks repeatedly use phrases like 'spectacular sunsets,' 'nightly sunsets,' and 'sunset views.' The consistency across many listings indicates high confidence.
No analysis available
The remarks directly confirm fireworks views from the building/unit, not just proximity to fireworks. This is repeated as a unit-view amenity and is strong evidence that residents can watch Friday night fireworks from their lanais or units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Resident manager evidence is very strong and consistent. Current remarks explicitly say 'onsite mgr.' and 'an on-site resident manager,' matching the historical MLS pattern of 18/20 listings with RESMAN. The repeated wording across many listings suggests this is a real building feature, not just checkbox noise.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.