One Kalakaua Senior Living
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
One Kalakaua Senior Living
Building Overview
One Kalakaua Senior Living in Downtown-Chinatown — senior building with pool and concierge.
About One Kalakaua Senior Living
Based on MLS data, One Kalakaua Senior Living is located in the Downtown-Chinatown neighborhood and was built in 1996. The building is constructed of concrete. Size and unit count are not specified in the available MLS records.
According to available records, the building offers on-site amenities including a pool, fitness center, resident manager, concierge, and security guard. Units have central air conditioning and some residences report mountain and Diamond Head views.
Parking is available with covered, assigned stalls and guest parking. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS data. This summary is based on MLS-provided information; buyers should verify specifics, current policies, fees, and availability with the listing agent or property management.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I looked for disclosures like "80% owner occupied," "majority owner occupied," or other owner-occupancy indicators. The remarks focus on senior-living amenities and services, but do not provide any occupancy percentage. Because no number or clear qualitative statement appears, the exact owner-occupancy rate is unknown.
I searched for an explicit elevator count such as "4 elevators," "four elevators," or "multiple elevators." The remarks clearly confirm elevator access and proximity, but they do not state how many elevators are in the building. Because no count is provided, the exact number remains unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
The building consistently shows central A/C included: 19/20 MLS records flag it, and current remarks explicitly say "central A/C" or list it among included utilities. Multiple listings confirm this from different agents and descriptions.
Evidence is very strong across the building: 19/20 MLS records flag cable, and current remarks repeatedly mention "basic cable" and "basic cable TV" in the monthly fees. This appears consistent across many listings and agents, not a one-off copy-paste error.
This feature is only moderately supported. The MLS history is mixed (12/20), and current remarks generally say "utilities included" or "all utilities" rather than explicitly naming common-area electricity, so this is best treated as implied rather than directly confirmed.
No analysis available
Electricity is extremely well supported: all 20/20 MLS records flag it, and several remarks explicitly say electricity is included. The evidence is consistent across the building and not dependent on any single listing.
No analysis available
Strong evidence: HOTWAT appears in all MLS records and the public remarks frequently call out 'all utilities' or list water/hot water among included items. No consistent agent statements indicate units use individual water heaters that would exclude hot water from fees.
Moderately strong evidence: many listings explicitly note internet is included (including a clear fee breakdown stating 'internet' is covered) and MLS INTSER appears in numerous records, supporting inclusion of internet in the maintenance fees.
No analysis available
Sewer inclusion is fully supported by both MLS data and remarks. The current remarks and historical records align completely, with 20/20 listings flagging sewer.
Water is strongly supported across the building: 19/20 MLS records flag it and several remarks explicitly list water among included fees. This looks consistent and broadly confirmed by multiple agents.
There is direct evidence that the building has BBQ/grilling facilities: one public remark says residents have a "bbq area" just an elevator ride down. This is consistent with at least 1 listing explicitly describing the amenity, while the MLS data shows only 2/20 checked, suggesting the box may be inconsistently entered but the feature exists.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Weak/insufficient evidence: only 3 of 20 listings currently flag a clubhouse in MLS and the remarks discuss 'club dues', dining rooms and multipurpose/activity rooms but do not describe a dedicated 'clubhouse' or 'community center'. Given sparse MLS checks and absent descriptive remarks, clubhouse is unlikely but not proven absent.
Multiple remarks and historical MLS entries confirm a staffed front desk/concierge-style service: listings include phrases like "concierge services", "concierge desk", "24-hour front desk" and "secured entry with concierge service." While fewer MLS listings previously had CONCIE checked (5/20), the explicit repeated remarks from different agents indicate a building-level concierge/front-desk service is present.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong, building-level evidence: 18 of 20 MLS entries include the exercise/fitness amenity and numerous remarks say "fitness center", "exercise classes" and "gym". Mentions appear across multiple listings and agent remarks, indicating a shared, building-wide fitness facility rather than a single-unit feature.
No analysis available
Multiple remarks confirm shared meeting space, including phrases like "conference room," "meeting rooms," and "multipurpose room." With 20/20 MLS entries carrying the amenity, this looks like a stable building feature rather than copy-paste noise.
Multiple listings reference building outdoor spaces and private lanais — e.g., "VERY RARE 1 BEDROOM ... WITH A LANAI!", "Unit #910 ... has a lanai", and several listings note "OPEN LANAI INCLUDED", "poolside cabana area", and "landscaped outdoor walking paths." At least several (approximately 6–10) separate listings mention lanai/patio or outdoor seating/cabana features, and historical MLS checkbox data (13/20) also indicated patios/decks, so evidence is strong and consistent across agents rather than isolated copy/paste.
Evidence supports inclusion: although only 4 of 20 MLS checkboxes were marked, multiple agent remarks explicitly mention 'landscaped outdoor walking paths' and 'outdoor walking paths' (quotes: 'landscaped outdoor walking paths', 'outdoor walking paths'), indicating the property provides walking/jogging path amenities.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Moderate-to-strong evidence: although only 9 of 20 current MLS checkboxes show RECARE, numerous remarks reference "recreation areas" and "organized activities in the recreation areas", supporting that the building offers shared recreation spaces and amenity decks/areas.
Very strong evidence: 19 of 20 MLS entries include a recreation/rec room and remarks repeatedly cite "game room", "activity room" and "rec room". The amenity is described consistently across listings, indicating a communal recreation room in the building.
The evidence for an on-site restaurant/dining facility is extremely strong. Remarks describe a "full service restaurant," "dining room," "gourmet meal service," and meals prepared on site, aligning with the 20/20 MLS amenity pattern.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings and remarks reference building storage: examples include "extra storage space located next to the parking space", "storage lockers", and "sale includes one storage unit within the assigned parking stall." While only 2/20 MLS amenities checkboxes and 1/20 unit_features currently list storage, corroborating language appears across several agent remarks (not isolated to a single listing), providing strong evidence the building offers storage units/lockers.
I looked for surfboard-specific storage amenities in the public remarks. The listings mention general storage lockers and storage near the parking area, but nothing about surfboard storage.
No analysis available
Trash chute availability is well supported and likely a standard building feature. The MLS data is unanimous at 20/20, and the remarks explicitly mention "trash chute on each floor," which is exactly the kind of direct confirmation expected for a building-level amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The building clearly offers a whirlpool/hot tub/spa feature. Public remarks use multiple equivalent terms—"jacuzzi," "whirlpool," and "spa"—and several listings mention a heated pool and jacuzzi together, which is strong corroboration even though the checkbox is not unanimous.
Very strong evidence the building has a pool. Across the provided remarks, pool access is mentioned in many listings and described consistently as a heated pool, swimming pool, or poolside cabana area, which aligns with the historical MLS record of 20/20 listings showing pool amenities. The repeated wording across multiple listings and agents suggests this is a stable shared building amenity, not a copy-paste error.
Multiple listings (historically 17 of 20) and numerous public remarks explicitly note a 'heated pool' or 'heated swimming pool' (e.g., 'heated pool and jacuzzi', 'heated swimming pool'), providing strong, corroborated evidence that the building's pool is heated.
I searched the remarks for any explicit salt-water pool wording. The pool is repeatedly described as heated, along with a jacuzzi, but never identified as salt water.
Strong building-level evidence that laundry_in_unit is available in One Kalakaua. Multiple current remarks explicitly mention it across many listings, including 'in-unit washer/dryer,' 'stacked washer and dryer,' and 'washer/dryer,' which aligns with the 20/20 MLS inclusions data. This does not look like a one-off copy/paste error; it appears to be a consistent building feature.
No analysis available
I looked for public references to paid laundry such as coin-op, card-operated machines, or laundry fees. The remarks do not describe any community laundry payment requirement.
I searched the public remarks for references to laundry facilities on each floor or any floor-specific community laundry setup. The listings only mention in-unit washer/dryer in some units and general building amenities, but nothing about community laundry on every floor.
No analysis available
Assigned/reserved parking is clearly present in the building. Across the remarks, many listings explicitly mention "one assigned parking stall," "one covered parking stall," "one garage parking stall," or "secured covered parking," indicating this is a common building feature rather than a one-off unit detail. The evidence is strong and consistent across multiple listings, with some likely copy-paste repetition but plenty of direct confirmations.
Strong, consistent evidence that the building provides covered parking: 20 of 20 MLS listings historically list covered/garage parking and many remarks explicitly state phrases like "1 covered parking stall" and "secured covered parking." Mentions appear across multiple agent remarks (not isolated), so confidence is high that covered parking is a building feature.
I searched for deeded/owned parking language and found references to included, assigned, secured, or covered stalls only. That supports parking being available with the unit, but not specifically deeded.
No analysis available
I looked for parking cost terms such as monthly parking fee, parking rental, or additional parking charge, and found none. The listings describe parking as included, assigned, or secured, but do not state a separate parking price.
Guest parking is supported by multiple listings and explicit remarks. The clearest evidence includes phrases like "Ample guest parking" and "16 guest parking stalls in front of the entrance," which directly confirm visitor parking at the building. The repeated amenity language across listings makes this a strong building feature, not just an isolated unit note.
There is clear evidence of controlled/secured parking and entry: multiple remarks state 'secured garage', 'secured covered parking stall', 'secured entry with concierge', and mention security cameras and front-desk sign-in; combined with 10/20 MLS secured-entry flags this supports that parking has secured entry.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for parking waitlist language like "join waitlist" or "parking waiting list" and found nothing. The remarks instead reference assigned, secured, or included parking stalls.
No analysis available
I looked for public references to card/fob-based security access. The remarks mention secured entry, 24-hour front desk, concierge, and security, but not a card or fob access system.
Security service is strongly supported across the remarks, with many listings explicitly mentioning "24-hour security," "24/7 emergency response," "front desk/surveillance," and "secured entry." The language appears consistently across multiple agents and copy-paste style listings, reinforcing that this is a building-wide service rather than a one-off claim.
I searched for any language indicating a patrol service or roving security presence. The remarks emphasize security staff, emergency response, and front desk coverage, but do not mention patrols.
No analysis available
The evidence is very strong that One Kalakaua offers building-level central air conditioning. Across the remarks, well over a dozen listings explicitly mention "central AC," "central A/C," or "central air conditioning," and several also note it in fee/utility inclusions. This looks consistent across multiple agents rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 20 of 20 current MLS listings include CONCRE in construction materials, giving very strong building-level evidence that One Kalakaua is concrete constructed. The remarks across many listings are consistent and show no sign of a legitimate construction change; this looks like stable MLS data rather than copy-paste error.
Only 5 of 20 MLS listings flag double-wall construction and none of the public remarks mention 'double wall' or similar language. Given the low and inconsistent MLS presence and the complete absence of corroborating public-remarks text, the double-wall attribute is likely not a reliable feature of the building.
No analysis available
Nine of 20 current MLS listings (9/20) indicate 'MASSTU' (masonry/stucco). None of the public remarks explicitly say 'masonry' or 'stucco', so the evidence is moderate and likely originates from MLS checkbox entries (possible copy/paste across some listings).
No analysis available
3 of 20 MLS listings list 'SLAB' for construction_materials, but none of the public remarks reference a concrete slab foundation. Historical confidence was Low and the sparse MLS checks are not corroborated by remarks, so slab is possible but only with low confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Four of 20 MLS listings (4/20) indicate 'ABOGRO' yet none of the public remarks reference 'above ground' construction or materials. The sparse and unsupported checkbox entries provide only weak evidence, so this feature is considered unlikely based on available remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for short-term rental indicators such as vacation rental, TVU, NUC, or STR-permitted wording and found none. The repeated senior-living/55+ restriction is inconsistent with short-term rental use, so STR is treated as not allowed.
I looked for hotel rental pool references like Hilton pool, Ritz pool, or managed hotel program language and found none. Because STR is not supported here, hotel-pool participation must be false.
I searched for wording such as mandatory pool, required participation, or cannot opt out, but found none. Since there is no evidence of an STR or hotel rental pool program, mandatory participation is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for leasehold language such as ground lease, lease expiration, or a renewal year, but the remarks consistently indicate fee simple ownership instead. Because there is no leasehold referenced, there is no expiry year to extract.
I searched the public remarks for VA loan language such as "VA approved," "VA financing," or "VA loans accepted" and found none. The listings focus on fee simple ownership, senior-living services, and amenities rather than financing eligibility.
I searched the public remarks for insurance language indicating full building coverage or walls-in coverage. Nothing in the listings references HOA insurance status. With no evidence provided, this is treated as not confirmed in the remarks.
Fire sprinklers are strongly confirmed across the building. One listing explicitly states "Fire sprinklers installed," and the MLS history remains high with 16 of 20 current listings showing the FIRSPR amenity. The repeated building-wide pattern suggests this is a real shared feature, not a one-off agent entry.
I looked for language like FLSE passed, life safety compliant, fire safety certified, or passed fire inspection. The remarks do not contain any such approval statement, and the presence of fire sprinklers alone does not prove a formal evaluation pass. Based on the remarks, there is no evidence to mark this as passed.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong building-level evidence supports mountain views. Across the remarks, many listings explicitly reference 'mauka,' 'Koolau views,' 'Tantalus,' 'mountain views,' and 'panoramic mountain view' from multiple units and agents. This appears consistent rather than a copy-paste error, with current data also showing many listings tagged MOUNTA.
There is strong, repeated evidence that some units in the building have Diamond Head views. Multiple remarks from different listings explicitly say 'views of Diamond Head,' 'panoramic Diamond Head,' or list Diamond Head alongside city/ocean views. This aligns with the current MLS data showing DIAHEA entries and is not just a single-agent anomaly.
City views are very well supported across the listings. Numerous remarks mention 'city views,' 'Honolulu skyline,' 'downtown HNL,' and 'endless city views' from different floors and unit types, indicating this is a real building-level feature available in some units. The frequency and consistency of mentions make the evidence very strong.
No analysis available
Moderate evidence from several listing remarks (approximately 4–6) referencing garden/courtyard or landscaped views and treetop/park views (quotes: "landscaped outdoor walking paths", "in a garden setting", "tree top, and green park views"). These repeated but fewer mentions suggest some units face garden/courtyard areas, though the signal is weaker than city-view evidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Zero listings' remarks mention 'sunset', 'evening sun', 'western exposure' or similar phrases. Current MLS view_descriptions also show 0/20 with SUNSET, and there is no agent language indicating newly added sunset/western views, so there is high confidence the building should not be labeled as having sunset views.
No analysis available
I searched for wording that residents can see Friday night fireworks from the building or from their units. The remarks discuss city, mountain, ocean, Diamond Head, and other views, but nothing about fireworks views.
No analysis available
There is no explicit evidence in the public remarks that One Kalakaua has a resident manager on-site. While 6 of 20 current listings carry the RESMAN amenity, the remarks consistently focus on front desk, security, concierge, and nursing staff instead, which does not confirm a resident manager. This looks more like inconsistent MLS checkbox usage than a clearly verified building amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.