One Kalakaua Senior Living

No analysis available

I looked for disclosures like "80% owner occupied," "majority owner occupied," or other owner-occupancy hints. The remarks consistently describe a 55+ senior community and ownership opportunities, but they do not provide an owner-occupancy rate. Since no percentage is stated, the value cannot be determined from the remarks.

I searched the public remarks for an explicit elevator count such as "4 elevators," "multiple elevators," or a spelled-out number. The remarks only confirm elevator access and proximity to elevators, which is not enough to determine how many there are. Because no count is given, the value remains unknown.

Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.

Central A/C is consistently included across the building. The remarks repeatedly mention “central AC,” “central air conditioning,” and “use central A/C,” matching the MLS pattern (19/20). Evidence is very strong and clearly building-level.

Cable inclusion is strongly supported across the building. Multiple listings explicitly say “basic cable TV” or “basic cable,” and the MLS history is consistent (18/20). This looks like a stable building-level amenity rather than a one-off agent error.

Common-area electricity is only moderately supported. The MLS history is mixed (13/20), and the public remarks mostly use broader wording like “utilities included” or “all utilities” rather than naming common electric directly. This appears plausible but less explicit than the other fee items.

No analysis available

Electricity is fully supported across the building. Several remarks explicitly say electricity is included, and the MLS data is unanimous (20/20). This is one of the clearest building-level inclusions in the dataset.

No analysis available

Hot water appears to be included in the maintenance/club fee structure. The MLS history is very strong (19/20 HOTWAT), and the remarks repeatedly describe “all utilities” or broad utility coverage. One listing references water-heater-related language, so this is slightly less than absolute, but still strongly supported.

Moderately strong evidence: many listings explicitly note internet is included (including a clear fee breakdown stating 'internet' is covered) and MLS INTSER appears in numerous records, supporting inclusion of internet in the maintenance fees.

No analysis available

Sewer is clearly included in fees. The MLS data is unanimous (20/20), and the remarks directly confirm it in multiple listings. There is no meaningful contradiction in the public descriptions.

Water inclusion is strongly supported across the building. The MLS history shows 19/20 listings flagging water, and public remarks explicitly mention water in the fee package. This appears to be a stable building-level benefit.

There is direct evidence that the building has BBQ/grilling facilities: one public remark says residents have a "bbq area" just an elevator ride down. This is consistent with at least 1 listing explicitly describing the amenity, while the MLS data shows only 2/20 checked, suggesting the box may be inconsistently entered but the feature exists.

No analysis available

No analysis available

No analysis available

There is no clear public-remark evidence that One Kalakaua has a clubhouse or community center. Listings mention 'club dues' and shared dining/activity services, but not a distinct clubhouse, so this feature should not be assumed.

Concierge/front desk service appears to be a real building feature. Several remarks mention 'concierge services,' 'secured entry with concierge service available,' '24-hour front desk,' and 'front desk sign-in,' indicating staffed desk service beyond security alone. The evidence is moderately strong and recurring across multiple listings, though less uniformly stated than security.

No analysis available

No analysis available

The exercise/fitness amenity is strongly supported across the building. Multiple remarks mention 'exercise room,' 'fitness center,' 'gym,' 'fitness room,' and recurring 'exercise classes,' consistent with building-wide senior-living amenities rather than a one-off unit feature.

No analysis available

Meeting-space evidence is unanimous in the MLS and repeatedly confirmed in remarks. Listings reference 'conference room,' 'meeting rooms,' 'private dining room,' and 'multipurpose room,' indicating shared space available to residents.

Multiple listings reference building outdoor spaces and private lanais — e.g., "VERY RARE 1 BEDROOM ... WITH A LANAI!", "Unit #910 ... has a lanai", and several listings note "OPEN LANAI INCLUDED", "poolside cabana area", and "landscaped outdoor walking paths." At least several (approximately 6–10) separate listings mention lanai/patio or outdoor seating/cabana features, and historical MLS checkbox data (13/20) also indicated patios/decks, so evidence is strong and consistent across agents rather than isolated copy/paste.

Evidence supports inclusion: although only 4 of 20 MLS checkboxes were marked, multiple agent remarks explicitly mention 'landscaped outdoor walking paths' and 'outdoor walking paths' (quotes: 'landscaped outdoor walking paths', 'outdoor walking paths'), indicating the property provides walking/jogging path amenities.

No analysis available

No analysis available

No analysis available

The building is repeatedly described as having recreation areas or recreational spaces for residents. Even where the exact checkbox is not always marked, multiple remarks reference 'recreation area(s)' and organized social/recreational programming, supporting a shared amenity.

Recreation room evidence is very strong and appears repeatedly across many listings. Agents use several equivalent phrases—'game room,' 'rec room,' and 'activity room'—which suggests a shared building amenity rather than isolated copy.

The building clearly offers an on-site dining/restaurant feature. Remarks consistently mention 'full service restaurant,' 'dining room,' 'fine dining,' and meal service, showing this is a core building amenity rather than copy-paste noise.

No analysis available

No analysis available

Multiple listings and remarks reference building storage: examples include "extra storage space located next to the parking space", "storage lockers", and "sale includes one storage unit within the assigned parking stall." While only 2/20 MLS amenities checkboxes and 1/20 unit_features currently list storage, corroborating language appears across several agent remarks (not isolated to a single listing), providing strong evidence the building offers storage units/lockers.

I looked for surfboard storage, board storage, surf storage, or combined bike-and-surfboard storage. The listings mention general storage lockers and secured storage units only, with no surfboard-specific facility.

No analysis available

Trash chute availability is strongly supported and appears to be a standard feature of the building. The MLS is unanimous, and remarks explicitly mention a 'trash chute on each floor,' which confirms the amenity.

No analysis available

No analysis available

The whirlpool/spa feature is well supported by both the MLS and remarks. Multiple listings use interchangeable wording—'jacuzzi,' 'whirlpool,' and 'spa'—to describe the shared amenity.

Very strong evidence the building has a pool. Across the provided remarks, pool access is mentioned in many listings and described consistently as a heated pool, swimming pool, or poolside cabana area, which aligns with the historical MLS record of 20/20 listings showing pool amenities. The repeated wording across multiple listings and agents suggests this is a stable shared building amenity, not a copy-paste error.

The feature is confirmed by numerous listings, with many agents explicitly describing a 'heated pool,' 'heated swimming pool,' or 'heated pool and jacuzzi.' This appears consistently across current remarks and is not a one-off note, so confidence is very high. The evidence strongly supports that One Kalakaua offers a heated pool as a shared building amenity.

I searched for explicit saltwater pool wording such as "salt water pool" or "salt pool." The pool is described as heated, with a jacuzzi or spa, but there is no evidence it is salt water.

Laundry in unit is clearly available in One Kalakaua. The evidence is very strong: current MLS inclusions show washer/dryer in 20 out of 20 listings, and several remarks explicitly say “in-unit washer/dryer” or “stacked washer and dryer.” This appears consistent across multiple listings and agents, so it is not likely a copy-paste error.

No analysis available

I looked for references to coin laundry, laundry fees, card-operated machines, or any other paid common laundry setup. The remarks do not describe community laundry being available or requiring payment.

I searched for wording like "laundry on each floor," "laundry room on every floor," and similar phrases. The public remarks mention elevators, trash chutes, storage, and in-unit washer/dryer in some units, but nothing confirms community laundry on every floor.

No analysis available

Assigned/reserved parking is clearly present in the building. Across the remarks, many listings explicitly mention "one assigned parking stall," "one covered parking stall," "one garage parking stall," or "secured covered parking," indicating this is a common building feature rather than a one-off unit detail. The evidence is strong and consistent across multiple listings, with some likely copy-paste repetition but plenty of direct confirmations.

Strong, consistent evidence that One Kalakaua provides covered parking. Across the current remarks, many listings explicitly mention "secured covered parking," "one parking stall in a secured garage," "one garage parking stall," or simply "covered parking," which aligns with the long-standing MLS pattern. The evidence appears highly consistent across multiple agents rather than a one-off copy-paste error.

I searched for deeded, owned, or included-in-deed parking language and found none. The listings consistently describe stalls as assigned, covered, secured, or simply included, which does not establish deeded ownership. Based on the remarks, parking appears to be included/assigned rather than deeded.

No analysis available

I looked for phrases like parking fee, monthly parking charge, additional parking cost, or parking rental and found no such references. The listings discuss monthly club dues and other building fees, but do not identify any separate parking charge. With no evidence in the remarks, this remains unconfirmed.

Guest parking is supported by multiple listings and explicit remarks. The clearest evidence includes phrases like "Ample guest parking" and "16 guest parking stalls in front of the entrance," which directly confirm visitor parking at the building. The repeated amenity language across listings makes this a strong building feature, not just an isolated unit note.

There is clear evidence of controlled/secured parking and entry: multiple remarks state 'secured garage', 'secured covered parking stall', 'secured entry with concierge', and mention security cameras and front-desk sign-in; combined with 10/20 MLS secured-entry flags this supports that parking has secured entry.

No analysis available

No analysis available

I searched for parking waitlist or parking waiting list language and found a direct negative mention: "no waitlist." That is strong evidence against a parking waitlist system for this building. The rest of the remarks also describe parking as included or assigned rather than waitlisted.

No analysis available

I looked for keycard, fob, card reader, or electronic access wording. The public remarks consistently describe secured entry, 24/7 front desk/security, and concierge service, but do not explicitly mention card-based access.

Security guard service is clearly present at the building. Across the remarks, many listings explicitly reference '24-hour security,' '24/7 emergency response,' '24/7 security,' and 'secured front desk entry,' which aligns with the MLS amenity checkbox being present in 14 of 20 listings. The evidence is consistent across multiple agents and appears to reflect a real building-level service rather than copy-paste noise.

I searched for phrases indicating patrol service or roving security. The remarks emphasize 24/7 security, emergency response, front desk monitoring, and surveillance, but not patrols.

No analysis available

Central air conditioning is strongly supported across the building. Roughly 17+ listings explicitly mention it in remarks, including multiple agents using phrases like "central AC," "central A/C," and "use central A/C," plus several notes about a "new A/C system" or central AC included in fees. The consistency across many listings suggests this is a building-level feature, not a one-off copy-paste error.

No analysis available

No analysis available

All 20 of 20 current MLS listings include CONCRE in construction materials, which is very strong building-level evidence that One Kalakaua is a concrete building. The public remarks are consistent with that MLS pattern and do not suggest any change.

Only 5 of 20 MLS listings flag double-wall construction, and no public remarks use language like "double wall" or "two walls." This looks like limited MLS coverage or inconsistent agent input rather than strong confirmation, but it is enough to keep the feature as a possible building-level offering.

No analysis available

Nine of 20 current MLS listings indicate masonry/stucco construction, so this feature appears to be present for at least some units or as part of the building description. None of the public remarks explicitly say "masonry" or "stucco," so the evidence is driven by MLS checkbox data rather than agent remarks.

No analysis available

3 of 20 MLS listings list 'SLAB' for construction_materials, but none of the public remarks reference a concrete slab foundation. Historical confidence was Low and the sparse MLS checks are not corroborated by remarks, so slab is possible but only with low confidence.

No analysis available

No analysis available

Four of 20 MLS listings (4/20) indicate 'ABOGRO' yet none of the public remarks reference 'above ground' construction or materials. The sparse and unsupported checkbox entries provide only weak evidence, so this feature is considered unlikely based on available remarks.

No analysis available

No analysis available

I searched for short-term rental indicators such as STR-permitted wording, vacation rental, TVU, NUC, or hotel-style rental language and found none. The repeated 55+ senior-living context strongly indicates short-term rentals are not allowed.

I looked for hotel rental pool references such as managed-by-hotel language or branded pool programs and found none. Since STR is not supported in the remarks, a hotel pool program is also not supported.

I searched for wording like mandatory pool, required participation, cannot opt out, or must be in a rental program and found nothing. Because the remarks do not support STR or a hotel pool, there is also no evidence for a mandatory pool.

No analysis available

No analysis available

I looked for leasehold language such as ground lease, lease expiration, lease renewal, or a lease end year, but the remarks consistently describe the building as fee simple. Because no lease expiry year appears in the public remarks, there is nothing to extract.

I searched the public remarks for VA loan language such as "VA approved," "VA financing," and "VA loans accepted" and found none. The listings consistently emphasize fee simple senior living, amenities, and fees rather than financing eligibility.

I searched for insurance-related language such as fully insured, full insurance, walls-in coverage, or comprehensive building insurance. The remarks discuss dues, security, housekeeping, meals, and amenities, but not HOA insurance coverage. There is no public-remarks evidence to confirm full insurance coverage.

Fire sprinklers are strongly confirmed for One Kalakaua Senior Living. Historical MLS data shows 16/20 listings with FIRSPR, and current remarks explicitly state "Fire sprinklers installed" in at least one listing, with no meaningful contrary evidence. This looks like a real building-level feature rather than agent copy-paste noise.

I looked for phrases like fire/life safety evaluation passed, FLSE passed, fire safety certified, or passed fire inspection. The remarks reference fire sprinklers and strong safety services, but they do not explicitly say the building passed a fire/life safety evaluation. With no direct confirmation, this remains unverified and is treated as false.

Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.

No analysis available

No analysis available

Strong building-level evidence supports mountain views. Across the remarks, many listings explicitly reference 'mauka,' 'Koolau views,' 'Tantalus,' 'mountain views,' and 'panoramic mountain view' from multiple units and agents. This appears consistent rather than a copy-paste error, with current data also showing many listings tagged MOUNTA.

There is strong, repeated evidence that some units in the building have Diamond Head views. Multiple remarks from different listings explicitly say 'views of Diamond Head,' 'panoramic Diamond Head,' or list Diamond Head alongside city/ocean views. This aligns with the current MLS data showing DIAHEA entries and is not just a single-agent anomaly.

City views are very well supported across the building. Multiple listings explicitly mention "city views," "Honolulu skyline," "downtown HNL," and "endless city views," showing this is not a one-off agent description. The evidence is strong across many remarks from different listings, so the building should be considered as offering city-view units.

No analysis available

Moderate evidence from several listing remarks (approximately 4–6) referencing garden/courtyard or landscaped views and treetop/park views (quotes: "landscaped outdoor walking paths", "in a garden setting", "tree top, and green park views"). These repeated but fewer mentions suggest some units face garden/courtyard areas, though the signal is weaker than city-view evidence.

No analysis available

No analysis available

No analysis available

Zero listings' remarks mention 'sunset', 'evening sun', 'western exposure' or similar phrases. Current MLS view_descriptions also show 0/20 with SUNSET, and there is no agent language indicating newly added sunset/western views, so there is high confidence the building should not be labeled as having sunset views.

No analysis available

I searched for direct references to fireworks views from lanais, units, or the building itself. The remarks discuss city, mountain, Diamond Head, ocean, and skyline views, but do not mention fireworks views.

No analysis available

There is no explicit evidence in the public remarks that One Kalakaua has a resident manager on-site. While 6 of 20 current listings carry the RESMAN amenity, the remarks consistently focus on front desk, security, concierge, and nursing staff instead, which does not confirm a resident manager. This looks more like inconsistent MLS checkbox usage than a clearly verified building amenity.

No analysis available

No analysis available