One Kalakaua Senior Living
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
One Kalakaua Senior Living
Building Overview
One Kalakaua Senior Living in Downtown-Chinatown — senior building with pool and concierge.
About One Kalakaua Senior Living
Based on MLS data, One Kalakaua Senior Living is located in the Downtown-Chinatown neighborhood and was built in 1996. The building is constructed of concrete. Size and unit count are not specified in the available MLS records.
According to available records, the building offers on-site amenities including a pool, fitness center, resident manager, concierge, and security guard. Units have central air conditioning and some residences report mountain and Diamond Head views.
Parking is available with covered, assigned stalls and guest parking. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS data. This summary is based on MLS-provided information; buyers should verify specifics, current policies, fees, and availability with the listing agent or property management.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for ownership-ratio clues such as "80% owner occupied," "majority owner occupied," or similar statements, but none appeared. The remarks focus on senior-living services, amenities, and access rules rather than occupancy composition. Without an explicit percentage, the owner-occupancy rate cannot be determined from these remarks.
I found multiple references showing the building has elevators, but the remarks never state how many. I looked for explicit counts like "4 elevators," "multiple elevators," or a spelled-out number, and none were mentioned. Because the field asks for a number, the exact count remains unknown from these remarks.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
Central air conditioning is consistently supported across the building. Multiple listings explicitly mention "central AC" or "central A/C," and the MLS history is nearly unanimous at 19/20. This looks like a building-level inclusion rather than isolated agent copy.
Cable inclusion is strongly supported across the building. Multiple listings explicitly say “basic cable TV” or “basic cable,” and the MLS history is consistent (18/20). This looks like a stable building-level amenity rather than a one-off agent error.
There is only mixed support for common-area electricity. Current remarks focus on general utilities and do not clearly identify common-area electrical service, so this is not well substantiated from the public remarks. The MLS signal is also only moderate, suggesting this may be an agent checkbox inconsistency rather than a verified building feature.
No analysis available
Electricity is strongly and consistently included. Several listings explicitly say the fees include electricity or utilities, and the MLS data is unanimous at 20/20. This is a very high-confidence building feature.
Gas inclusion is not supported by the remarks and is barely present in the MLS history. Only 2 of 20 listings flag it, which looks more like occasional agent copy/paste than a building-wide inclusion. I would not treat gas as a confirmed fee-covered utility.
Hot water appears to be included in the fee structure. The MLS history is very strong at 19/20, and the remarks repeatedly frame the fees as covering utilities in a full-service building. This is high-confidence despite one WTRHTR-related outlier in the history.
Internet inclusion is supported by direct wording in at least one detailed listing and reinforced by multiple listings describing broad utility bundles. The MLS history is not unanimous but still meaningful at 12/20, so this looks real even if not every agent checked it consistently.
No analysis available
Sewer is clearly included in the monthly fees. The MLS history is unanimous at 20/20, and the remarks directly confirm it in at least one listing. This is a very strong building-level feature.
Water inclusion is strongly supported across both the remarks and MLS history. At least one listing clearly says the maintenance fee includes water, and the historical checkbox pattern is 19/20. This is high-confidence and consistent across agents.
There is direct evidence that the building has BBQ/grilling facilities: one public remark says residents have a "bbq area" just an elevator ride down. This is consistent with at least 1 listing explicitly describing the amenity, while the MLS data shows only 2/20 checked, suggesting the box may be inconsistently entered but the feature exists.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is no clear public-remark evidence that One Kalakaua has a clubhouse or community center. Listings mention 'club dues' and shared dining/activity services, but not a distinct clubhouse, so this feature should not be assumed.
Concierge/front desk service appears to be a real building feature. Several remarks mention 'concierge services,' 'secured entry with concierge service available,' '24-hour front desk,' and 'front desk sign-in,' indicating staffed desk service beyond security alone. The evidence is moderately strong and recurring across multiple listings, though less uniformly stated than security.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence is very strong across the building. Multiple listings explicitly mention "exercise room," "fitness center," "gym," or "workout"-type amenities, and the MLS checkbox is also mostly populated. This looks consistent across many agents rather than a one-off copy/paste issue.
No analysis available
Meeting-space evidence is unanimous in the MLS and repeatedly confirmed in remarks. Listings reference "meeting rooms," "conference room," and related community gathering spaces, making this feature highly reliable. No sign of a correction or change.
Strong building-level evidence supports patio/deck amenities. Multiple current listings explicitly mention lanai or open lanai, with at least several distinct agents describing a "private and covered lanai," a "40+ square foot lanai," and an "OPEN LANAI INCLUDED". This is consistent with the historical MLS amenity data and does not look like a one-off copy-paste error.
The jogging/walking path feature is supported, though not every listing names it. A number of remarks specifically describe "landscaped outdoor walking paths," which aligns with the MLS history. This is credible despite being mentioned less often than the core indoor amenities.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is solid support for a shared recreation area, though not as uniform as some other amenities. Several listings explicitly mention "recreation area(s)" and activity spaces, while others describe recreational programs that fit the same amenity cluster. The evidence is moderate to strong overall.
Recreation room evidence is extremely strong. Across the remarks, agents frequently describe "game room activities," "rec room," and "activity room," matching the MLS pattern almost universally. This is well-supported and consistent.
The building clearly offers an on-site dining/restaurant feature. Remarks consistently mention 'full service restaurant,' 'dining room,' 'fine dining,' and meal service, showing this is a core building amenity rather than copy-paste noise.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings and remarks reference building storage: examples include "extra storage space located next to the parking space", "storage lockers", and "sale includes one storage unit within the assigned parking stall." While only 2/20 MLS amenities checkboxes and 1/20 unit_features currently list storage, corroborating language appears across several agent remarks (not isolated to a single listing), providing strong evidence the building offers storage units/lockers.
I looked for surfboard storage, board storage, surf storage, or bike-and-surfboard storage references. The remarks mention storage lockers and general storage units, but nothing specific to surfboard storage.
No analysis available
Trash chute availability is very well supported and appears to be a standard building feature. The MLS is unanimous, and remarks explicitly confirm chutes on each floor. This is high-confidence and consistent across listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Whirlpool/spa evidence is strong and consistent. Many listings mention a "jacuzzi," "whirlpool," or "spa," which are clear equivalents for this feature. The MLS and remarks align well across the building.
The building clearly has a pool. Current remarks mention it in dozens of listings with phrases like “heated pool,” “swimming pool,” “pool, jacuzzi,” and “poolside cabana area,” which is consistent across multiple agents and not a one-off mention.
The heated-pool feature is strongly supported by the remarks. Many listings explicitly describe a “heated pool” or “heated swimming pool,” often alongside jacuzzi/spa references, indicating this is a shared building amenity rather than copy-paste noise.
I searched for explicit salt-water pool wording such as "saltwater pool," "salt pool," or "saline pool." The pool is repeatedly described as heated with a jacuzzi/whirlpool, but there is no salt-water pool mention.
In-unit laundry is clearly available at One Kalakaua. Across the remarks, many listings explicitly say "in-unit washer/dryer," "stacked washer and dryer," or list washer/dryer among the appliances, matching the MLS inclusions pattern (20/20 listings). The evidence is strong across multiple agents and appears consistent rather than a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
I looked for coin-op, card-operated, quarters, laundry fee, or other paid common laundry wording. The public remarks describe weekly housekeeping and some units with in-unit washer/dryer, but do not mention paid community laundry.
I searched for language like "laundry on each floor," "laundry room on every floor," or similar floor-by-floor laundry references. The remarks mention many amenities and some in-unit washer/dryer units, but nothing about common laundry facilities on each floor.
No analysis available
Assigned/reserved parking is clearly present in the building. Across the remarks, many listings explicitly mention "one assigned parking stall," "one covered parking stall," "one garage parking stall," or "secured covered parking," indicating this is a common building feature rather than a one-off unit detail. The evidence is strong and consistent across multiple listings, with some likely copy-paste repetition but plenty of direct confirmations.
Covered parking is strongly supported across the listings. Multiple remarks explicitly describe "secured covered parking," "covered parking stall," "secured garage," and "one garage parking stall," which is consistent with the historical MLS data showing covered parking on nearly all listings. The evidence appears broad and repetitive across many agents rather than a one-off mention.
I searched for deeded parking, owned parking, or parking included in deed language. The remarks consistently mention one stall, secured covered parking, or assigned parking, but nothing indicates the stall is deeded.
No analysis available
I searched the public remarks for explicit parking fee language such as 'parking fee,' 'monthly parking charge,' 'additional parking cost,' or 'parking rental.' The remarks repeatedly mention parking stalls, secured covered parking, and garage parking, but none state a monthly fee amount. Based on the listings provided, the parking fee cannot be determined from public remarks.
Guest parking is confirmed by current remarks, most clearly the listing that states "16 guest parking stalls in front of the entrance." That explicit detail aligns with the historical MLS data showing guest parking on many listings, so this feature should remain included. The evidence is consistent and appears to reflect building-level amenities rather than a copied checkbox error.
There is clear evidence of controlled/secured parking and entry: multiple remarks state 'secured garage', 'secured covered parking stall', 'secured entry with concierge', and mention security cameras and front-desk sign-in; combined with 10/20 MLS secured-entry flags this supports that parking has secured entry.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for parking waitlist or waiting list references and found a clear no-waitlist statement. That is strong evidence the building does not have a parking waitlist system.
No analysis available
I looked for key card, fob, card reader, electronic access, or keycard entry language. The remarks do mention secured entry, front desk security, and concierge/reception, but nothing specifically indicating card or fob access.
Security guard/service is strongly supported across the listings. Many remarks explicitly mention "24-hour security," "24/7 emergency response," "24-hour front desk," and "security and emergency response," while several others describe a secured building with concierge/front-desk control. The evidence is consistent across multiple agents and matches the historical MLS amenity data, so this feature should remain included.
I searched for security patrol, roving security, patrol service, or patrolled-building wording. The remarks emphasize 24/7 front desk, emergency response, door checks, and security staff, but do not describe a patrol service.
No analysis available
Central AC is strongly supported across the building. At least 15+ listings in the provided remarks explicitly mention it, including multiple independent descriptions such as "central AC," "central A/C," "central air conditioning," and "use central A/C"; one listing also says "NEW A/C SYSTEM!" This looks like consistent building-level HVAC coverage rather than a one-off agent error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Concrete construction is extremely well supported at the building level. All 20 of 20 current MLS listings include CONCRE, making this the strongest feature here and consistent with the building-wide remarks. There is no sign this is a copy-paste error.
Double-wall construction has limited but real MLS support, appearing in 6 of 20 current listings. None of the public remarks explicitly confirm it, and the language does not appear across multiple agents in a way that strongly reinforces the feature. This is a low-confidence building-level include rather than a confirmed correction.
No analysis available
Masonry/stucco appears in half of the current MLS listings, so this is plausible building-level construction evidence. No public remarks explicitly say 'masonry' or 'stucco,' which suggests the MLS checkbox may be the main source rather than agent narrative. Still, the repeated MLS presence makes it worth including.
No analysis available
3 of 20 MLS listings list 'SLAB' for construction_materials, but none of the public remarks reference a concrete slab foundation. Historical confidence was Low and the sparse MLS checks are not corroborated by remarks, so slab is possible but only with low confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Four of 20 MLS listings (4/20) indicate 'ABOGRO' yet none of the public remarks reference 'above ground' construction or materials. The sparse and unsupported checkbox entries provide only weak evidence, so this feature is considered unlikely based on available remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for short-term rental indicators such as STR permitted, vacation rental, TVU, NUC, or hotel-style rental language. None were found, and the remarks instead describe an owner-occupant senior living community, so STR is not supported.
I looked for hotel rental pool references such as hotel-managed programs or branded pool participation. Nothing in the remarks suggests a hotel pool arrangement, and since STR is not allowed, this must be false.
I searched for mandatory pool language like required participation, cannot opt out, or must be in a rental program. No such wording appears, and there is no hotel pool program referenced, so mandatory participation is not indicated.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for leasehold language such as ground lease, lease expires, leasehold expiring, or renewal dates. The remarks do not mention any lease expiry year, so this remains unknown from the provided text.
I searched the public remarks for phrases like VA approved, VA financing, and VA loans accepted. None were mentioned, so there is no evidence the building is VA-approved.
I looked for insurance-related wording like fully insured, full insurance, walls-in coverage, or fully covered building insurance. The remarks contain many service and amenity details, but nothing about HOA insurance coverage. Since there is no direct evidence, this feature is not confirmed from the remarks.
Fire sprinklers are strongly confirmed for One Kalakaua Senior Living. Historical MLS data shows 16/20 listings with FIRSPR, and current remarks explicitly say "Fire sprinklers installed," which aligns with the long-running MLS pattern rather than a one-off agent error. Evidence is strong and building-level, with no sign this feature has changed.
I searched the public remarks for fire/life safety evaluation language such as FLSE passed, fire safety certified, or passed fire inspection, but found nothing. The comments do mention fire sprinklers and emergency response, which are safety-related, but they do not confirm a passed FLSE. With no direct mention, this remains unverified and treated as not evidenced.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong building-level evidence supports mountain views. Across the remarks, many listings explicitly reference 'mauka,' 'Koolau views,' 'Tantalus,' 'mountain views,' and 'panoramic mountain view' from multiple units and agents. This appears consistent rather than a copy-paste error, with current data also showing many listings tagged MOUNTA.
There is strong, repeated evidence that some units in the building have Diamond Head views. Multiple remarks from different listings explicitly say 'views of Diamond Head,' 'panoramic Diamond Head,' or list Diamond Head alongside city/ocean views. This aligns with the current MLS data showing DIAHEA entries and is not just a single-agent anomaly.
City views are very well supported across the building. Multiple listings explicitly mention "city views," "Honolulu skyline," "downtown HNL," and "endless city views," with many different agents repeating the same theme across current remarks. This is strong building-level evidence, not just a one-off unit feature.
No analysis available
Moderate evidence from several listing remarks (approximately 4–6) referencing garden/courtyard or landscaped views and treetop/park views (quotes: "landscaped outdoor walking paths", "in a garden setting", "tree top, and green park views"). These repeated but fewer mentions suggest some units face garden/courtyard areas, though the signal is weaker than city-view evidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Zero listings' remarks mention 'sunset', 'evening sun', 'western exposure' or similar phrases. Current MLS view_descriptions also show 0/20 with SUNSET, and there is no agent language indicating newly added sunset/western views, so there is high confidence the building should not be labeled as having sunset views.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit views of Friday night fireworks from units, lanais, or the building. The remarks mention city, mountain, ocean, and Diamond Head views, but nothing about seeing fireworks from the property.
No analysis available
There is no explicit evidence in the public remarks that One Kalakaua has a resident manager on-site. While 6 of 20 current listings carry the RESMAN amenity, the remarks consistently focus on front desk, security, concierge, and nursing staff instead, which does not confirm a resident manager. This looks more like inconsistent MLS checkbox usage than a clearly verified building amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.